Making this an immersive horror game by watching this while at my cubicle job. I was not ready for Dumont. Not sure how I forgot him...or the horse he road in on.
It's interesting how you pick up on so much of the subtext but then miss the multiple references to what the term "goat" refers to. Maybe that's intended on the game's part though.
Please more ++++ Genius vs AntiChrist 1 It would be a great game to do the entire gameplay. This game had a great audience on channels similar to yours right now like WayneRadioTv and others ! Great game at all .
05:34 Why do you describe people with "they" and then literally 5 seconds later use "man with a suitcase". Please explain this SPECIAL train of thought. I' m curious.
I assume it's similar to the way you used "people" and then referred to one person (which was oddly tone deaf, if not hypocritical). Because it's completely valid in a sentence. It looks to me like the only SPECIAL thing here might just be the way you're seeking attention. I hope what I'm giving you is sufficient, and your needs are met!
Y'all are wrong. What this person is saying in other words, is why Keith initially goes with gender-neutral tone but some moments later switches to binary tone with no particular reason, pronouns included. I've been watching this channel quite intensively for a while, and I'm definitely noticing that too, although I don't really wanna know the answer because I don't really care all that much, and it also feels to me like it may be a sensitive topic for Keith. I think Keith is doing just fine, overall, in that regard honestly, especially comparing to most ppl out there. Even within LGBTQIA+ community.
@C__e_beYond No, we understood. We just also didn't want to get sucked in a bad faith conversation about how woke, or sorry, "SPECIAL" it is to refer to someone in what is a perfectly valid way, with someone who put effort into asking their question in a less than respectful way.
@C__e_beYond Bluryder kind of said it already but I want to expand on it, that was a normal way to refer to someone, and has been for years, so why was the "switch" even acknowledged in the first place? The only way you focus on that switch is if you were already thinking about it, or it is constantly on your mind
Making this an immersive horror game by watching this while at my cubicle job.
I was not ready for Dumont. Not sure how I forgot him...or the horse he road in on.
God this is such a good game!
The hawk tuah level
Was Sintra humming a song from Swan lake? That's a foreboding song.
push table to wall mouth
Idk why but i heard it and thought. "hawk twoa" 1:43:22
It's interesting how you pick up on so much of the subtext but then miss the multiple references to what the term "goat" refers to. Maybe that's intended on the game's part though.
Please more ++++ Genius vs AntiChrist 1
It would be a great game to do the entire gameplay.
This game had a great audience
on channels similar to yours right now
like WayneRadioTv and others !
Great game at all .
05:34 Why do you describe people with "they" and then literally 5 seconds later use "man with a suitcase". Please explain this SPECIAL train of thought. I' m curious.
Because "they" is a thing that people have used to refer to a singular person since the 14th century? What kind of question is this?
I assume it's similar to the way you used "people" and then referred to one person (which was oddly tone deaf, if not hypocritical). Because it's completely valid in a sentence. It looks to me like the only SPECIAL thing here might just be the way you're seeking attention. I hope what I'm giving you is sufficient, and your needs are met!
Y'all are wrong. What this person is saying in other words, is why Keith initially goes with gender-neutral tone but some moments later switches to binary tone with no particular reason, pronouns included. I've been watching this channel quite intensively for a while, and I'm definitely noticing that too, although I don't really wanna know the answer because I don't really care all that much, and it also feels to me like it may be a sensitive topic for Keith. I think Keith is doing just fine, overall, in that regard honestly, especially comparing to most ppl out there. Even within LGBTQIA+ community.
@C__e_beYond No, we understood. We just also didn't want to get sucked in a bad faith conversation about how woke, or sorry, "SPECIAL" it is to refer to someone in what is a perfectly valid way, with someone who put effort into asking their question in a less than respectful way.
@C__e_beYond Bluryder kind of said it already but I want to expand on it, that was a normal way to refer to someone, and has been for years, so why was the "switch" even acknowledged in the first place? The only way you focus on that switch is if you were already thinking about it, or it is constantly on your mind