Is A HUGE 4 Cylinder Better Than a V8? // 2022 Silverado LT 4x4 Review
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 лют 2025
- The worlds largest production Gasoline 4 Cylinder engine.. in a Silverado
Social & Merch Links:
Website: www.sarahntune...
Instagram: sarahntuned
TikTok: sarahntuned
Twitter: sarahntuned
Patreon: / sarahntuned
Amazon Store: www.amazon.com...
Merch: shop.sarahntun...
Special Thanks to my Patreon Support!
Britt F.
Chad B.
Col. L.
Curtis S.
Daniel F.
Darren M.
Dave
David L.
Jeffrey P.
Josh H.
Kevin C.
Mark L.
Meghan "in Seattle"
Nenad R.
Ray I.
Terry S.
Todd C.
How did I never find this channel before researching silverados? Former Engineer, doing car reviews, with an amusing rating system, and no signs of shilling for local dealerships or mfgs, AND doing restos/mods??. This is like everything I want in a youtube channel.
Sarah rocks
A junk motor 😮 that couldn't tow anything safely
These 2.7 turbo have been around for a few years already and so far everyone who owns one says they are pretty reliable.
I'd opt for the 8 over the 4 any day, especially since the 4 is turbocharged and can drop half it's displacement. That 4 might be great new, but I very much doubt it will age well. Also, when did a low end truck costing over 50 grand become a good deal. I must be getting old.....GET OFF MY LAWN !
It’s running technology from diesel engines and a fully forged bottom end to aid in long term durability, per GM.
@@sleeper.simulant7327 also I drive a truck for a company, a big diesel one, and boy am I glad I didn’t pay for that turbo being replaced, just picked the truck up the other day and it cost multiple thousands on the invoice. I’m in the wrong business, replacing parts on super expensive junk that was literally designed to break seems very lucrative
Yes! Exactly .
@@sleeper.simulant7327 junk
@@monkmoto1887 Speaking as a mechanic, it's only lucrative if you own a stealership.
I love how I always know what to expect when I see your videos. Humorous thorough and concise.
WoW. .. I love the undercarriage assessment you give in your reviews. And that you take the time to research oddities that appear with these newer vehicles. This sets you apart from ALL of the other car reviewers out there
Well said!
I was waiting for the "She's a bleeder" comment when talking about the backpressure valve.
Right! Instant sub
Savagegeese does it better
Thanks Mom !!!
The Porsche 944 S2 from 1989-91 had a 3.0 liter 4 cylinder with 208 hp. Wow! Has technology changed over the years.
That engine was NA though, very impressive for the time❗️
A year later i saw this i had a chuckle at these numbers. Our old suburban with the 454 had the exact same HP/TQ figures in 1997!!! What a riot.
Has a plastic oil pan !!! Wonder how that will play out over time ?
new technology just adds more cost and problems.
Tackling those two hills with so little drama was truly impressive! And I agree with you that sometimes, the lower trim levels are just more desirable cars.
We didn't have Z71's when I grew up and we didn't gouge our oil pans open every 10 miles w/o skid plates, how did we do it?
Props to GM for sticking with a regular oil filter and not going to a cartridge.
I love the 2.7s, driven a few at the last job i was at, the turbo is quite loud, and the truck has torque for days. Sounded like a tractor in some of those shots
Really cool with the drone shots - worked really well on the off road parts - I think you got the balance right as well - so many people go overboard with a drone as soon as they get one. Also nice to see you still barking mad - don't ever change you and you sense of humour are the main reason why people watch this channel!!
This was just a test, I bought one of my own after filming this to use in the future.
@@marcochavane3124 What it turned into gorgeous flavoured cheese?
I have heard about this truck with this engine nad been wondering what it's like.
Thanks for doing this truck that a lot of reviewers might ignore. You do a good job selling it, I kind of want one!
I have a 2021 GMC 2.7 LTE version. When I got it I traded a 2017 5.3v8 and wanted another v8 but none were available. I was hesitant about the 2.7 but I soon learned to love it and I have gotten as high as 29.9 mpg on a long distance drive.
@@dwightneisler3844 - Two wheel drive or four? And you find it powerful enough? Thanks!
@@randolfo1265 4x4. LTE version. Plenty powerful. I only tow a 12 ft trailer with a Zero-turn mower, no problems.
@@dwightneisler3844 - I like the idea even more now.
I just bought a 2023 Sierra Elevation 2.7 based a lot on Sara's review I watched a year ago. I came back to the video to watch it again after having purchased and driven a similar model, very happy so far.
I am a huge sucker for a throaty V8 engine. But this thing convinced me that someone needs to give me $50k to put one in my driveway! Loved this review!
Just to clarify, there is no black paint under the High Temperature Wax coating in the frame. It is applied directly over bare steel in a dip tank. The frame is welded together, dipped in a cleaning solution and then waxed. The transfer case logo is not American Axle but Magna International (who supplies the frame itself to GM). The plastic panel covering the front suspension components is not a “skid plate” but a stone shield.
I bet you work at Formet.
@@dougsmith7195 No I don’t. This particular frame was more than likely built in Mexico at Formex as the majority of the short box crew cabs are.
Almost nothing on there is American made. The salt in winter where I live would eat that frame pretty quickly. My father had an 89 Ford F-150 with a straight 6, it hauled better and lasted longer than any GM product we ever had. The gentleman that bought it is still driving it today.
You can use SEM Cavity Wax to protect the undercarriage the wand can go in between tight spaces.
@@codiwonkanobi9788 I like fluid film
Best thing about this newer Gen Silverado is they added back the reg cab and short bed Configuration I bet this thing scoots in that configuration. This did impress me. If i had waited to buy something this would have been on the list of vehicles to buy.
Wow crazy world getting craziness, gM trucks "boring", for crazy people 😜
@@bradzimmerman3171 no, they're just shit
@Clinton Turner scotty knows nothing.
The turbo 4 is the only engine you can get with the scsb silverado and sierra
Love my 2021. Can't believe they up graded the tourque from 2021 to 2022. I have 384 ftlbs compared to 420 or 430 ftlbs. Quick and nimble.
I think the 5.3 would be a better long lasting combo. Boosted 4's don't always hold up that well.
Boosted 4 cylinder Will hold up as long as not abused or pushed beyond there means and maintain properly.I smile at the fuel pump ⛽ every 420 mi between visits 😃
Modern ones hold up pretty well. Also this 2.7 runs a forged bottom end and they mimicked technology from diesels to make the engine more durable for more extended periods of time…
@@sodbuster518able You got some kind of crystal ball?
@@sleeper.simulant7327
For sure, the 4-Cylinder hold very well.
But, i will dispense easily on 200NM and 100HP instead of the Sound.....
They do not hold up that well. Cylinder deactivation is bad for engines also turbo is just another thing that can go wrong. Specifically when people extend oil changes. Chevy says 7500 miles but that’s too much. Sludge starts happening and it’ll clog oil feed lines. Wasting turbochargers
These trucks are nice and the 4cyl is highly underestimated, i love the simplicity.. my new work truck is a 3500 4x4 and we often use it on muddy snow packed roads in remote locations, the traction system when using off road mode works fantastic, no need to spin tires throwing mud everywhere , it just goes right thru .. thanks for the review
I would rather have an inline 6 turbodiesel or the 4.3v6
Drw or single
@@cloroxlavenderscent4307 drw
Shutting down cylinders to save fuel is dumb. It causes premature cylinder wear to the "off" cylinders. Honda did it with the Odysseys in the 2000's and they are notorious for oil burning once you get some miles on them. Dumb... love the lab coat look 😍
Why would it cause premature wear? Actual question.
GM has been doing this since the 1970s, at least. Maybe longer, but I'm too brainfried from work to remember right now. The premature cylinder wear isn't the only problem that they've had by far.
@@robertt9342 It's normal for a small amount of oil to squeeze past the cylinder rings as the piston cycles, and it combusts with the air and fuel already in the cylinder without a problem. When Honda designed its cylinder deactivation system they didn't account for the quantity of oil that would pool up in the cylinder without combustion actively clearing it out. As a result, the oil would all combust at once when the cylinder was reactivated and cause issues with the piston rings and egr.
Has this been a problem with GM engines?
Premature wear from no combustion causing cylinders to be mechanically forced down instead of with help. Causes extra strain on bearings and cylinder walls. It’s terrible for engines
I just like that it has the handle gear shifter on the dash where it belongs!!! Their new pho-dodge tiny shifter in the center console blocks valuable space where I need to set drive thru food bags on toad trips!
You should sell those penguins in your merch store. I'd love to get my niece one.
I'd drop at least $20 on that penguin!
Approaching 60k on my ‘21 2.7. So far zero issues, and zero regrets. I take it on long road trips, and tow heavy stuff sometimes. The looks I get when I tell people it’s a four cylinder are priceless 😂
Can't stop laughing about "Cinamom rolls" and "Plood".🤣🤣🤣
Didn't expect so much power in that car.
👍🏻
Colour is also nice.
I was impressed it made it up those hills with those wimpy tires! I think in a standard cab short bed it would be a decent Off Roader with just some AT's!
I'm really surprised with how impressed I was with this thing. Who would have thought a 4-cylinder full-sized truck would be this good. What a beautiful color, too.
Junk.
I`ve had my 2022 Chevy Custom since January 2022 and now have 13k on it and it has been great. I`m averaging 20 mpg for everything and am surprised still at the power for a four banger and 310 HP motor. I had a 2008 Ram 1500 with the 4.7-liter V8 that was also 310 HP and it was way less powerful than this was. Time will tell if this truck goes at least 200 thousand miles.
maybe if its towed
Did I miss it in a previous video, or was this a first for an overhead drone shot of donuts? Awesome! Thanks as always, Sarah. 👍👍👍
The paint on this truck looked wicked in that shot.
I think this is the first drone shots. Overhead and eye level following the Chevy. Dynamic views.
Sarah had mentioned getting a drone months ago....costly..... and I mentioned
that other creators were having success, except one. His drones were being taken out by eagles.
@@garyworokevich2524 I wonder who was “piloting”… Charlie, Angel Food Cake, or was it autopiloted?
@@Primus54 Angel offered to use his drone as a test to see if it was worth me buying one.
@@SarahnTuned As creative as you are with your productions, if you get one I look forward to how you work it into your videos. 👍
I've been driving turbo charged Saab's for nearly 30 years now. My current 9-5 is tuned to 300 HP and 330 ft pd of torque out of a 2.3L 4 cylinder turbocharged engine. The torque delivery of a turbocharged engine is totally different than an NA engine. Peak torque comes in at low RPM and stays until way up in the RPM range. This means the engine can do more work at lower RPM's and the power feels effortless. Also consider that I get 33 mpg out of my car on the hwy. If I had a 300 HP v-8 under the hood i'd be lucky to get 23-24mpg. My Saab 9-5 has 217K miles on it and runs perfectly and still outruns almost any family sedan on the road. If these turbocharged engines are engineer right they last and make impressive power with better fuel econ.
This engine deserves to be in a awd hatch to slay the jdm n euro hatches
GM wouldn't build something like that.
It’s probably too big to fit into a transverse engine bay.
I just like that you say aluminium the right way. The rest is just a bonus.
I agree with Scotty. A turbo 4 cylinder usually wears out faster
I have seen a few older Saabs with turbo 4's with over 250,000 and the head or oil-pan never removed.
They're fun to drive when they are new. But become endless money pits as they age.
I hope you enjoyed the break from wrenching 7 days a week. I found this review refreshing, especially after seeing how well a 4 cylinder can handle a full size truck. I laughed as your burger bun analogy tanked.
Wasn’t a break, I filmed this review months ago. Still worked.
The advantage of this over the Ford 2.7 ecoboost, with fewer cylinders they can make the block, rods, pistons, etc. beefier to handle the boost. It's the main reason why Toyota opted for a 3 cylinder on the Corolla GR. I don't expect this to become the sales leader over the 5.3, and I would personally take the 5.3 if I were buying one because V8 sounds and the LS/LT motors are known to be pretty reliable and have huge aftermarket potential, but it is nice to have options. this engine is going to be awesome in the Colorado/Canyon
This has no advantages over Fords ecoboost. Period.
@@jibrilthegreat35expect it is experiencing better reliability. Period.
@@davidporter7051the bar is on the floor here
Wow - just when I thought your reviews could not get any better, you ad drone-photage and take it to the next level - a million times better than TV, that's for sure. - And yeah - a 4-cylinder in a huge truck sounds like such a weird thing, especially an American truck that you would think only could have a V8... Awesome review - Thank you for what you do and Stay Awesome!
No one even wants them in a compact as the real world mileage isn't much better. I fell for this in the '80s by being talked into buying a I6 instead of a 5.0
@@lesliehorwinkle - no-one in the US, I guess you mean, - here in the EU, 4-bangers are still the norm in most regular cars and will continue to be so for some time still, untill the EVs take over all-together.
Torque rating is really impressive, especially at 3,000 RPM. I was thinking maybe this was a diesel.
Now, on to get my 88 4.3 V6
Up to 120 hp 😁😁😁😁
Yay car reviews are back, like the donut drone shot. 👌
Thanks, I ended up buying a drone after testing one out filming this video.
This motor doesn't make a lot of sense for most Truck owners but I have been impressed with the tech involved in it. It has been out over a year now and I haven't heard too much bad except the fuel mileage. This motor belongs in a car of some sort just to make things exciting. I would also love to see the intake tech and valvetrain tech in a V8. Spoiling a turbo right off idle is pretty slick. Love my GM stuff.
I get what you're saying about the motor not making much sense in a truck... That is 100% true for people that use it as a truck, the sad thing is most don't anymore. It's more of a fashion statement, in my opinion for a majority of truck and larger SUV drivers. They should definitely put it in a car of some sort but it needs to be RWD as GM would likely put it in a car in a wheel hopping, torque steering, tire spinning FWD pos...
@@justplanefred Cadillac uses that basic engine in one of their cars.
@@justplanefred It tows 9100 lbs, I think it works just fine.
@PhantomPhoton I'm not saying it won't tow... Just may not for people that are regularly tow heavy loads. Sure it will tow 9100 lb but if you do it every other day perhaps you should be looking for something else. If you tow occasionally it should be fine.
So.... I think I'm in love with.....
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Sarah 🥰
Nice review. GM makes a great driving truck.
I heard GM also sells this truck with an Isuzu sourced four-cylinder diesel engine in it.
If it's the same four-cylinder diesel engine they put in their small delivery trucks, it's definitely worth buying. Those Isuzu diesel four cylinders are powerful, tough and reliable. They would have zero trouble moving a pickup this size and they live on turbo's very well.
They have a 3.0 straight 6 diesel for the US market. Now that dodge dropped their diesel chevy is the only one left with a diesel in a 1/2 ton.
@@erikkovacs3097 Any ideas why Dodge dropped the baby diesel ?
@@bill3641 the brand CEO claimed that it’s because they’re going “full bore with electrified powertrains” but that’s probably bs.
no they dont they have a 3.0 duramax diesel and Isuzu dont make Duramax
@@bill3641 dodge eco diesel is trash
Sweet, reviews are back ☺️
This was supposed to go up on the other channel, but I needed to get ahead on videos going into the winter incase I get sick. I was filming and editing last minute all last month.
@@SarahnTuned Or have videos in advance to rest without being sick😇
I like that mild redesign on the front end. Imo, it looks better than the model it replaces.
I'll jump on the bandwagon here and applaud your use of the drone, that adds a in interesting element to the overall video, well done!
I had a 2019 with a V8 and the torque converter went out at 30k miles (service record says “Glazed Over”). It took 3 months to fix and when I got it back, it behaved the same way as when I took it in initially. Sometimes when coming to a stop, it'd feel like you got rear ended. In those 30k miles, I had the roof leak, went through 3 recalls on the brakes, the head end unit would randomly reboot when I got a MS teams notification on my phone while plugged into my iPhone. I sold it and went to Nissan and have been mostly happy since, although the Titan has its quirks as well - not nearly as much as the Silverado. (Edit for typo and update to issue ).
I've never heard of GM using a cvt in their trucks. That must be new. Sounds like a terrible idea though for something meant to put down power and tow.
I've loved your beetle vids but definitely missed your car reviews so I'm excited for this!
Yeah, I know some people don't like the reviews, but working on cars 7 days a week 10+ hours a day without time off is destroying me physically and mentally.
@@SarahnTuned Yeah I know you been struggling with the non-stop work especially after the beetle being a 24/7 job there at the end
You definitely deserve a break! I think seeing you overland the bronco some more would be cool too and let you relax outside the shop!
Just take care of yourself Sarah your mental and physical health matter most💙
Four pistons will vibrate a lot more than 8. I am sure many of you point that out below, but if you have ever been in a 10 or 12 cylinder car you would know what I mean, they hum rather than shake, by comparison they are like a sewing machine verses a tractor.
Love the aerial drone and panning shots!
Thank you so much Sarah you do a phenomenal job at reviewing these vehicles I've been looking to get one but I wanted to wait a couple of years to see what other versions they came out with.
Hey Sarah. Unfortunately the frame is waxed only. No paint underneath. If you live in Canada like I do, you have to re-wax yearly, as it wears off on certain sections. You can literally scrape the wax off to the metal, only don’t use your nail. That stuff is hard to get off fingers. 😁
Yep definitely fluid film every year or it will rust away 😳
Funny I would never watch a car review is you weren't doing it. I just enjoy your videos. If you are doing this off the top of your head that's even more amazing.
love you candor and style. Engine bay big enough to support a V8 and yet a 4 banger sized motor should leave space “like a hot dog down a hallway”…..please never change and if you have to move to some other platform i’ll follow you. I don’t say that to any reviewer or vehicle channel. you are unique and awesome! keep it up…Please and thank you!!!
The analogy of hamburger buns to cinnamon roll flavor was the most poignant and sophisticated lesson in automotive science that has ever been uttered by a human in the history of the universe.
I enjoyed the humour. A long time fan of the Silverado. They get converted to R H Drive for Australia and New Zealand of which nearly doubles the asking price.
More appearing on the road here in NZ.
Cool drone shots! 😎 Nice addition to the reviews 👍
OMG you are Hilarious the perfect cross of Auto Knowledge and Odd Humor
Surprising how good it is off-road. Plenty of space under the rails for some extra Penguin storage.
Sarah, that's a pretty real world test drive, thanks
4 Cylinder.....First time in many years that GM has sparked my interest. I'll be watching to see how well this drive train stands up as an every-day-work-truck as time goes by.
Same i bought one 4x4 and run a construction company so i plan to put it to the test long run wise
The Cadillac ATS ,engines include a 2.0-liter turbocharged I-4 gasoline engine that produces 272 hp (203 kW) /Production 2012-2019
Maybe you need to prescribe new glasses or brain pills?
I disabled the active fuel management system on my sierra with a 5.3l I have 169,000 miles no oil burning or issues at all
Ha!! It’s always funny to watch you crack yourself up.
I like big fours.
The 4 cyl makes since for light hauling and commuting. I am still hesitant to think of towing close to max alot with it. This was a great review as always and looked great with the matching shirt!
Should you really be comfortable towing a lot at max rating in any vehicle?
I bought the 2023 Chevy Trail Boss in the 2.7L. I have had mine for 6 months. Reliable so far. Great gas mileage. Ride is smooth as butter. Off the line and passing, definitely some hesitation though. I wish I had gotten the 5.3L.
This was the premier of a drone operator. Cool shots! 👍
That was Angels drone, just testing out if one would be worth using in future videos.
@@SarahnTuned IMHO it was definitely worth in an off-road review - very good potential for making stunning shots (like when you were baking donuts). I'd also try to use it during hill climbs, e.g. the front quarter view.
@@SarahnTuned Angel was godsend, wasn't he... 😉
@@bsmirnov I see what you did there.
The problem with any and all 4cyl engines is that there are times when all intake valves are closed, which messes badly with the PCV system.
An 8 cyl will always have at least 1 intake valve open, which makes the PCV system happy.
I'm definitely curious about the long term dependability of a 4 cylinder engine used in a large truck like that. My gut instinct is that it cannot keep up with a similarly powered V8.
It’s turbocharged. They don’t last long because instead of building a proper motor they slap a turbocharger on a shitty one.
It’s a 4 cyl. But it’s a HUGE 4 cyl. of the same displacement as their old V6. So I’m sure the bearings are large and beefy. If these engines start failing, I’ll bet it will be something unrelated to it being a 4cyl. It will probably be something on the upper end such as the variable cam timing etc.
It’s a Chinese truck assembled in Mexico… soooo…
@@dmandman9 Large displacement with fewer cylinders is always a less smooth running that one with more cylinders. It will be less comfortable. Fewer cylinder motors are just cheaper to build. Screw the customer, they won't notice why they really don't like the ride.
Ford pushed Ecoboost hard in my area when the first came out. They were everywhere for a couple of years. Just long enough for them to start having major problems. Tiny turbocharged engines will probably be fine in an urban setting but not so much in a rural environment where they will actually be used for their intended purpose.
I agree with you Sarah, full width rear seats are great. I miss my 20's.
I was in autobody technician five years. I was trained in frame straightening Ford rangers had a really strong frame. I also bought a Ford ranger an 89 for $500 drove it 100,000 miles was not one problem and sold it for $1000 and I was my early 20s.
That 2.7 is going to be good in the new Colorado. I just wish they gave it the 10 speed though
i'd love a 5speed manual
I agree the Colorado is the place for this motor
Equinox and Traverse too.
After hearing that exhaust note, I'll no longer complain about the exhaust note on my ecoboost.
Great review informative and covered a few items that are important and usually get missed. This 4cyl when introduced sounded a typical GM mistake, but you shed some light on the positives I prefer inline engines now GM needs to put the inline 6cyl back on the menu and offer it with a base none turbo option! There was a time when a Chevy could be had with a 6cyl a radio and air conditioner without paying for "THE PACKAGE BUNDLE" (KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID-KISS)
I have an old jeep xj with the legendary gm straight 6. It being over 20 years old, and less than 200k miles, the engine is still very strong.
As a swede I can approve of the cinnamon bun tangent.
The swirly goodness of the layers does wonder for the belly. :)
Ya know that +- switch on the column shifter is actually VERY useful while 4x4 and much better than console shift too. 👍
Nice review as always Sarah. I just have a problem with the 4 cylinder engine. It's probably the wave of the future.
I never thought I would ever see a four banger engine in a full size 4×4...
Surprised at this trucks capabilities.. perfect for a contractor or DIY homeowner. The 9,000 pound towing capacity is wild for a 2 ton truck. But .. those numbers always seem inflated by all manufacturers. I would think 6,500 would be very comfortable with this size/weight truck. QUESTION... did the truck have a break controller built in with the towing package?
The truck in this review did have an Integrated Trailer Brake Controller. It is located between the start/stop switch and the driver side temp selector. For a 2023 model, it can be selected as an option for $275. It also is included in four packages, two being the "Max Trailering Package" and the "Convenience Package II".
I don't think there are many people on here that really understand how a turbocharger works, the engine does not have to work harder, the engine does not have to rev higher, and the engine is probably just as strong as any other engine, given that it is built for the purpose of being turbocharged. Load on a turbo engine makes it spool faster, make more boost, and make more power farther down on the rpm range. Most n/a engines rev higher than turbocharged engines to make the same power. That being said, I would rather have a smaller cube V8 twin turbo over a 4 cylinder turbo or big cube V8.
That's pushing it for a 4 cyl displacement. Unless they've come up with something new, that's gonna require mucho balance shafting!
Cool to see some drone footage in this review [especially of the doughnut] Sarah its a nice touch!
Yeah that coating will delay heavy rust for about a week.
"The spare wheel does not match the drapes." I'm dying laughing. I so love you, Sarah. 🤣🤣🤣🌈💖🧡💛💚💙💜💋
Its been a while since I heard “its like throwing a hot dog down a hallway” thanks for that little quip Sarah 😂
Best explanation of a dual volute turbo with cylinder management ever.
You never disappoint .. nice review :-)
I couldn't get past the beautiful puppies.
We're spoiled for videos this week
i could listen to you talk about automotiveness all day
The fact that you're shirt matches the truck is a BONUS !
The Autotrac Single Speed Transfer Case is either made in Mexico or here in the United States in Muncie Indiana. Manufactured by Magna Power Train. I use to work at the Muncie plant years ago so I recognize the symbol on the case when you pointed it out
Seems better for someone who just wants a truck, but doesn't intend to tow or haul much. It should be fine for that.
I stepped down from V8 trucks to twin turbo V6 trucks! However, i am not now, nor will i ever be interested in a turbo 4! I plan to go all electric next (when more models become available and affordable)!
Nice looking truck. As for the 4 pot, I imagine it wouldn't be much fun towing a heavy trailer down a long grade with the little compression braking the engine would provide. Other than that, its an interesting engine option.
The 8 speed gearbox, with manual control over it should makeup for the fewer cylinders.
@@johndavidwolf4239 how will an 8 speed effect what was mentioned in this comment? What are you going to do when the top end needs to get pulled apart at 90k miles because it’s a direct injection turbod cheap piece of junk and it cost 5k bucks? They literally went backward in their design. We figured out in the 90s a lot of this stuff doesn’t work or has drawbacks that outweigh the advantage in a truck
@@monkmoto1887 : I was responding to your questioning engine braking. Presumably the gears in an 8 speed transmission are closer spaced than in a 5 speed, as such you should be able to find a gear closer matched to the steepness of the grade, and weight of trailer that would require a minimal of friction braking, even if the RPMs are up high. As you were asking about engine braking there would be NO fuel being used so I have no ides what being direct injected has to do with things?
@Brandon Finch All vehicles with 4 cycle engines can "engine brake", did your Malibu have a manual or automatic transmission, and what gear were you in? Rev limiters only work when you are giving the engine gas by cutting off, or down the fuel, did you mean redline?
They have decent control thats activated by brake pedal input.. it works really well when I'm traveling the ike gauntlet sometimes several times a week
Drove a turbo 4 for a month while my truck was in the body shop. Returned the truck Friday, the next day left in my 5.3 V-8 truck, so much smoother, and QUIET!
After taking my girlfriends new turbo four vehicle across country through the desert from Washington state to louisiana and all. I am now a believer.
I'm not especially into pickup trucks.. but this seems utilitarian.... Like you can actually do things with it without all the mess an fuss and bravado
... pretty cool 😎
This engine has been a game changer with the gm trucks… I have the 2021 gmc it’s way better in style the only two things I don’t like is that the both engine oil control pump & transmission pump failed within the first 60k miles of ownership and those pump are not located outside, the engine oil one is inside the oil pan and the transmission pump is inside the transmission
Along with that, maybe bc the turbo, it’s best not to go over 5k miles oil change intervals
Gas milage is great on the highway I’ve gotten 35 mpg and city I’ve had as high as 19 mpg and lowest has been 16mpg
Overall great engine choice for those who don’t need a V8 but want a full size truck
Nice review! I imagine the boost you’re lookin for wasn’t there partially due to the fact it has a transfer case, so it adds a bit of weight. The 4x4 can only tow 9100 vs. the 2x which can tow 9600. I drove a 2x and was pleasantly surprised at the launch. I still bought a V8 refresh though. Look forward to seeing more!
I looked at this same truck. In the low 50k's, I opted for a 2022 2500hd gasser for 54k. For 4k more to get the towing capability and reseale value, I just couldn't justify buying this little fella.
It’s not a huge four-cylinder… it is only 2.7 L. But it is a turbo four-cylinder. The engine cylinders are bored slightly off-center to the crank this gives the engine an incredible amount of torque for its size.
Right, even the 2.7 6 cyl in Chrysler products was fairly small
2.7L is pretty large for a 4 cylinder. Torque has a lot to do with the type of turbo in this vehicle as well. Fast spool from the dual volute turbine housing, allows pulses to hit the turbine wheel on opposite sides, maximizing efficiency of the turbo.
How is the literal largest production 4 cyl in the world not a huge 4 cyl?
There isn't any 4 cyl larger...
Or are you implying 2.7L isn't a lot of displacement (true fact)
@@716monk the second part
I had the 2.7 f150 and that thing was a rocket. Bonus was the lighter curb weight. Handled way better, and higher payload.
That's a Magna Steyr logo on the transfer case
good catch, I always though it was another type of AAM logo