There's a difference between recognizing someone's identity ('are you familiar with this person?') and having a personal relationship with them ('are you friends with this person?') She clearly IS more than familiar with Kaitlin Albert. There are "many" photos of them together. . Friends typically don't engage in behaviors like hugging if they're not close, similar to how Brian Albert claimed he wasn't close friends with Brian Higgins, yet they were seen in the Waterfall footage hugging, grabbing each other, pretend kissing and play fighting. Saying they aren't "close" seems like a semantic trick and an exploitation of the nuances of language and the broad interpretation of words like "close." Just like the semantic trick officer Yuri Bukhenik used saying the inverted video is "an accurate representation of the events." While technically true depending on ones own interpretation, it's a clear attempt to obscure the truth and create confusion.
She clearly misrepresented the relationship and attempted to distance herself from her. I do think it could rise to the level of perjury as she was quite clearly trying to create a different impression than reality
Your a typical woman who is just jelouse of another woman for being decent looking. If you think she is guilty after watching the trial you're an idiot. John o'keefe's father even thinks she is not guilty
The case was full of Witnesses committing Perjury
There's a difference between recognizing someone's identity ('are you familiar with this person?') and having a personal relationship with them ('are you friends with this person?') She clearly IS more than familiar with Kaitlin Albert. There are "many" photos of them together. . Friends typically don't engage in behaviors like hugging if they're not close, similar to how Brian Albert claimed he wasn't close friends with Brian Higgins, yet they were seen in the Waterfall footage hugging, grabbing each other, pretend kissing and play fighting. Saying they aren't "close" seems like a semantic trick and an exploitation of the nuances of language and the broad interpretation of words like "close."
Just like the semantic trick officer Yuri Bukhenik used saying the inverted video is "an accurate representation of the events." While technically true depending on ones own interpretation, it's a clear attempt to obscure the truth and create confusion.
U guys are like the jurors not bright
Agreed!
She clearly misrepresented the relationship and attempted to distance herself from her. I do think it could rise to the level of perjury as she was quite clearly trying to create a different impression than reality
Sandra Birchmore case is interconnected
FBI has it all. He doesn't mention it unless it has meaning!
THEY ALL COMMITTED PERJURY!
Love to see you on this case … I just adore you ❤
Well she went to school she went to party's at her college home when she didn't go there and quit a few other things
Let's not forget how many variations lying KR has to her story. Perhaps that's how Ashley Benefield has learned
Your a typical woman who is just jelouse of another woman for being decent looking. If you think she is guilty after watching the trial you're an idiot. John o'keefe's father even thinks she is not guilty
Karen Read NEVER hit John.
@sunshine22723 her story has remained the same. She didnt kill him. We all watched the trial and you dont know any more than we do or the jurors.