*RARE* Ilyushin Il-62 Departure To TRIPOLI From DONCASTER AIRPORT (UK) il76, ukraine Rada Airlines,

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 тра 2017
  • No762 VIDEO OF RADA AIRLINES Ilyushin Il62 , EW-450TR , RDA1562 TO TRIPOLI , LIBYA ,
    & WIZZAIR A321 , HA-LXI , W63015 FROM BUCHAREST ,
    BY M CONNOLLY ,
    27-05-2017 .

КОМЕНТАРІ • 345

  • @solid1378
    @solid1378 6 років тому +28

    Wow, when jet engines sounded like real jet engines. Reminds me of my first airplane trip in a BOAC Vickers VC10.

  • @rasputin4u1
    @rasputin4u1 4 роки тому +12

    The IL-62 is one of the most beautiful aircraft ever...very impressive take off.

  • @user-Magadan1974
    @user-Magadan1974 6 років тому +10

    По полосе бежит как гепард! Лучший самолет моей страны - СССР! Не звуки, а ПЕСНЯ!

  • @hannahtaylor3841
    @hannahtaylor3841 6 років тому +12

    Such a beautiful sound on the Il-62 😍

  • @comettoPL
    @comettoPL 6 років тому +11

    It was Il-62M actually.
    Thank you, very rare aircraft these days.

  • @davem4143
    @davem4143 6 років тому +18

    Never tire of watching a 62.

  • @stockmaster6620
    @stockmaster6620 4 роки тому +16

    Beautiful plane with rugged Russian engineering

  • @1968SMM
    @1968SMM 6 років тому +70

    Love Russia’s Aerospace Industry. They make amazing jets including Ilyushin and Irkut. I work for Pratt & Whitney and we love our Russian partners in Aviation.

    • @hj8272
      @hj8272 4 роки тому +2

      This piece of soviet garbage killed hundreds an hundreds and hundreds of people. Get educated mr ignorant..

    • @hasanjamil2067
      @hasanjamil2067 4 роки тому +13

      @@hj8272 So did the 737 Max and DC-10 Mr.Ignorant.

    • @carlosgutierrezschwanhause3079
      @carlosgutierrezschwanhause3079 4 роки тому +12

      @@hj8272 According ICAO list IL62 had 7 crashes with fatalities from 292 aircraft produced makes a 2.4% Boeing 737 had 48 crashes w/fatalities from 1964 units produced makes 2.44% Boeing 727 33 crashes from 1832 produced makes 1.8% Boeing 707 26 crashes fromo1010 unitis equals 2.6% and so on now you can judge properly if it was a garbagge or not see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_accidents_and_incidents_resulting_in_at_least_50_fatalities

    • @kris8742
      @kris8742 4 роки тому +1

      @@hj8272 You would have to be a septic tank [yank]

    • @takaharatanaka8818
      @takaharatanaka8818 4 роки тому +9

      It is just typical American, "If it wasn't built here it's crap and if it ain't Boeing I ain't going'" garbage.
      That despite Airbus having a safety record. that is just a tiny bit better.
      As a former US Army Rotary-Wing aviator, I had the chance to train and fly with the Russians before relations went south again. Russian equipment was engineered to be rugged and reliable but maintenance wasn't nearly what it is in the west. It isn't the equipment assholes. Scott and Carlos are right about that.
      I wish we still got along with them, fucking politicians :-(

  • @user-fr4er2vq4y
    @user-fr4er2vq4y 5 років тому +10

    Какой красавец!Жаль,что их так мало осталось!

  • @nakamichi682zx
    @nakamichi682zx 4 роки тому +5

    What a superb opportunity to create a near reference video of a take-off of an Ilyushin IL-62M but the videographer or who ever was responsible was too clever by half - editing it into a an utter shambles. Don't you understand that aircraft enthusiats want to see every move, every second of the airplane's spool-up, every second of the taxi-way tracking and turnaround at the ramp and every second of the pilot taking her 4/4 power and to final take-off? Potentially brilliant, mega-edited into a flaming mess. You snatched defeat out of the jaws of victory miar2006. My siggestion is do it again, whether it tuns for 45 minutes, it doesn't matter. But keep this one for people who prefer incomplete stories, unfinished symphonies and so forth.

  • @kirjohnset
    @kirjohnset 5 років тому +15

    Величавая птица. Он по-настоящему и с достоинством взлетает. Из дальнемагистральников - мой любимый.

    • @user-rg5jb1ei9y
      @user-rg5jb1ei9y 4 роки тому

      Царь

    • @IzthatafaC
      @IzthatafaC 4 роки тому +1

      I don't understand Russian but great engineering pal 👍

  • @solomonpilot2510
    @solomonpilot2510 6 років тому +2

    WOW! IT REMINDS ME THE VC 10 AND THX 4 POSTING !

  • @RudivanGoch
    @RudivanGoch 7 років тому +40

    Amazing catch mate!!! What a epic looking and sounding IL62!!!

  • @sezwo5774
    @sezwo5774 6 років тому +3

    Nice! A very powerful machine, flew in one in 1987 across the Atlantic. Not as comfortable inside as today's wider body passenger planes, but fast and sturdy.

  • @Dan-zc7ut
    @Dan-zc7ut 4 роки тому +5

    One just flew over my house from Donny like 3 minutes ago

  • @FUN-fy5dd
    @FUN-fy5dd 4 роки тому +6

    What a looker. Gotta love the rear quad engine configuration. So sexy.

  • @davekp6773
    @davekp6773 6 років тому +3

    Its pity videos like these get bogged down by who copied who comments, it just leads to needless arguments. There are only a limited amount of ways an airliner can look whether it have wing mounted or rear monted engines. Its a shame we cant just appreciate the aircraft for what they are and not from where they come from.

  • @eliaslai1769
    @eliaslai1769 4 роки тому +4

    Beautiful plane and nice video!

  • @TPAspotter
    @TPAspotter 6 років тому +43

    I'm a little late to this party but I just wanted to say...WOW!

    • @dogtown128
      @dogtown128 6 років тому +4

      I comment even on 5 year old videos lol

    • @sgtgrash
      @sgtgrash 6 років тому +6

      Indeed, WOW! A truly majestic aircraft, the layout of which takes me right back to my childhood sparking pleasant memories of me and my Dad spotting VC10's, 727's, Tridents, DC 8's, 707's and their ilk from the top of Heathrow's Terminal 3 car park all those years ago.

  • @jakewilcox7665
    @jakewilcox7665 6 років тому +8

    great video, even better listening to communications too. Subscribed your channel 🖒🖒

  • @knightflightvideo
    @knightflightvideo Рік тому +2

    Great video and sound of that beautie! 👍👍🤩🤩👌👌🤩🤩👍👍

  • @IzthatafaC
    @IzthatafaC 4 роки тому +5

    Such a great sound!

  • @awuma
    @awuma 4 роки тому +1

    I flew on one circa 1983, as a passenger. It was nicely appointed, with aluminium rather than plastic panels, and I believe wool instead of synthetics for upholstery. Those engines were an interesting sight from the rear of the cabin. I thought at the time that it was completely up to Western standards (and obviously much more fire-proof in the cabin), but sadly the Il-62M engines were not so reliable, no doubt a symptom of the decline of the Soviet system in the late 70s and 80s... a bit like the US situation today.

  • @nztv8589
    @nztv8589 6 років тому +4

    7:30 never noticed before how on the IL 62 the tailplane spud is angled considerably downwards

    • @imonymous
      @imonymous 4 роки тому +1

      It's not a fixed angle.

  • @coydog7902
    @coydog7902 4 роки тому +2

    I would love to ride on the il62

  • @Garythegangster
    @Garythegangster 6 років тому +6

    There was an Illyushin turboprop left Doncaster to Stockholm Monday evening (08/01/18). Came buzzing over my place (near Thirsk, North Yorks.) around midnight. Very distinctive drone had me reaching for my flight 24 app. Quite a number of eastern bloc visitors to Doncaster. I have personally seen several Antonov freighters in and out of there, amazing to see. Does anyone remember seeing a Globespan 747 doing test approaches into Doncaster some time back. Globespan planned a service to Canada but went bankrupt and the whole idea never took off (pun intended).

    • @SmartsAviation
      @SmartsAviation  6 років тому +2

      G Cunningham it was an An-12 you heard .

    • @ProjectFlashlight612
      @ProjectFlashlight612 6 років тому +2

      Sounds like an antique Antonov An-12. Respect for catching it.

    • @SmartsAviation
      @SmartsAviation  6 років тому +2

      Hi ,
      It was a Globespan B767 that did training & a B757 that did Canada for a while then went bankrupt as you said ,
      Here are are 2 videos I did 10 years ago lol .
      IGNORE the music ............LOL .
      B767 ua-cam.com/video/qRDzFQX0gX4/v-deo.html
      B757 ua-cam.com/video/7jRDWuMFSAk/v-deo.html
      B757 ua-cam.com/video/k5Dfd1LWtOU/v-deo.html
      Martin..........

    • @Spudchucker92
      @Spudchucker92 5 років тому

      Here in Hertfordshire we get old Antonov AN-12s flying over fairly regularly, normally late at night or during the early hours of the morning. Always either Ukraine Air Alliance or Cavok Air operated.

  • @AitorBeobideRubioSpotters
    @AitorBeobideRubioSpotters 6 років тому +2

    Una gran captura. Bien hecho.

  • @user-ru2dm8zv1d
    @user-ru2dm8zv1d 4 роки тому +3

    Красавец 62👍

  • @vlver8105
    @vlver8105 6 років тому +1

    I flew on IL-62 only once. It was in 2008 from BQS to DME

  • @kristinajendesen7111
    @kristinajendesen7111 6 років тому

    I hope the radio comms are clearer than that in the cockpit. Ours are crystal clear on the trains when speaking to the signalman (normally).

  • @epikurepikur6955
    @epikurepikur6955 6 років тому +7

    Very nice bird!

  • @aviatorfire7849
    @aviatorfire7849 6 років тому +4

    Dood IL-62 is old well done mentioning it rare and il 62 was made in 1963-1995

  • @dominichisplanespotting6574
    @dominichisplanespotting6574 6 років тому +2

    Amazing!

  • @SuperScratch1
    @SuperScratch1 4 роки тому +2

    Beautiful machine. Good machine

  • @connectorxp
    @connectorxp 4 роки тому +2

    Funny that I see HA-LXI in Tripoli as she is stationed in Otopeni, Romania. I will post a video of the Rada IL62 as it was also in Otopeni, several times.

  • @larou14
    @larou14 6 років тому +4

    I love this aircraft ++++++ ! Thank you so much for this beautiful vidéo ! 👍👍👍

  • @dwmzmm
    @dwmzmm 6 років тому

    Saw the Aeroflot passenger version at Gimbo International in South Korea back in March 1997 during a brief layover coming from Los Angeles to Manila. It looked like it hadn't been cleaned in a while, lots of soot visible on the exhaust part of the engines as well as the tail cone part of the fuselage. Noticed on the information screen inside the terminal that it was headed to Vladivostok, Russia. Had the chance to see it taxi out to the runway and do the takeoff. Still a cool sight to see!

  • @911gpd
    @911gpd 6 років тому +10

    Now that's a badass aircraft.

  • @nathanjohntv7902
    @nathanjohntv7902 6 років тому +2

    This was amazing,,, wow😊😊😊

  • @mgtowrules1649
    @mgtowrules1649 6 років тому +2

    Now that is one pretty bird!

  • @Aviatorspot
    @Aviatorspot 2 роки тому +1

    Great catch of the slender quad engine plane takeoff. First time I see it online. What a name for an airport" Robin Hood"!!! Is it where he came from?

  • @danchoyordanov4804
    @danchoyordanov4804 6 років тому +2

    Wow!What a beauty

  • @annointedone4376
    @annointedone4376 6 років тому +4

    look at all those birds...

  • @crazyspotter4950
    @crazyspotter4950 6 років тому

    nice video! SUBBED!

  • @Baphomethify
    @Baphomethify 6 років тому +11

    красавчег!

  • @AndreiTupolev
    @AndreiTupolev 6 років тому +71

    Sounds like Mario is flying it.

    • @justindivinagracia6086
      @justindivinagracia6086 6 років тому +2

      what how ????

    • @procksomaterman
      @procksomaterman 6 років тому +6

      conspiracy theory Mario is a communist

    • @speedbird5280
      @speedbird5280 6 років тому +6

      The pilot does kinda sound like MARIO through the ATC

    • @Panzer-535
      @Panzer-535 6 років тому +6

      that explains the red suit....

    • @H-Zazoo
      @H-Zazoo 4 роки тому

      I honestly don't know how the controllers understand. It must just come practice with all-comers.

  • @Василий_Север
    @Василий_Север 6 років тому +2

    Красиво!

  • @25blacksnow
    @25blacksnow 6 років тому +2

    That sound 🔥

  • @kangaroogirl88
    @kangaroogirl88 6 років тому +23

    what a noisy bird! beautiful tho!

  • @kristinajendesen7111
    @kristinajendesen7111 6 років тому +1

    Can anybody tell me, are the radio coms actually clear to understand in the cockpit? We use G-SMR radio on the trains and it is normally crystal clear.

  • @danielshon
    @danielshon 6 років тому +2

    Beautiful & misterious plane

  • @timrusling1459
    @timrusling1459 4 роки тому +2

    Jet engines aren't supposed to be quiet! These wonderful noises are an anthem.

  • @paulashwin247
    @paulashwin247 6 років тому +41

    Modern planes are boring

  • @pascalchauvet4230
    @pascalchauvet4230 6 років тому +4

    Anyway these are two beautiful aircraft

  • @sbchelldiver
    @sbchelldiver 6 років тому +3

    @6:36 the palm trees collapse to allow Thunderbird 2 to taxi...

  • @catalin2409
    @catalin2409 6 років тому +2

    beautiful bird

  • @amc3
    @amc3 6 років тому +1

    What an aircraft, the tone of the engines is pretty phenomenal. Great capture, you lucky person.

  • @matthiasendler7268
    @matthiasendler7268 6 років тому +1

    Back in the late 1980's I had the chance to fly in such an airplane twice. Berlin -> Leningrad and Moscow -> Berlin. The Il-62M were owned and operated by Interflug. The flight from Leningrad to Moscow was operated by Aeroflot with a Tupolev 154.

  • @chriskelly6285
    @chriskelly6285 6 років тому +8

    Great looking plane.

  • @FX-fk8yt
    @FX-fk8yt 6 років тому +1

    interesting if they improved the engines bearing systems. Two of IŁ62 crashed in Poland a long time ago, killing hundreds of people. Both disasters were due to bearing damages causing main shaft breaks. The suddenly unloaded compressors reached very high rpms and exploded, causing further damages of steering systems in tail section.

    • @sanchesseli
      @sanchesseli 6 років тому +2

      FX, polish engines blew off because polish airlines tried to reduce maintance costs and didn't repaired engines in due time. These engines must be repaired every 5000 hours. The polish one worked about 8000 hours without proper check. So it exploded...

  • @deeayo6054
    @deeayo6054 4 роки тому

    A beautiful take off. My memory is that a BAC 1-11 was significantly noisier.

  • @zoltanposfai3451
    @zoltanposfai3451 6 років тому

    Now imagine a multi hour passenger flight at the rear of the plane. Your ears will feel it for days :)

  • @thefridgeman
    @thefridgeman 6 років тому

    The last Il-62 I saw was in 1998 in SFO.

  • @martinsteiner8287
    @martinsteiner8287 5 років тому +1

    Thank you very much!! Yes Paul modern airplanes are realy boring!! But look to the world of nowadays: The Kids are brainless and let them easy manipulate!! The Mighty il 62 is very impressive . How beautiful was the unforgotten semiliar VC 10 in the Colours of the BOAC!!

  • @tomf3150
    @tomf3150 6 років тому +2

    Hey cool, thid plane looks like a Caravelle on steroids, love it !

  • @logtothebase2
    @logtothebase2 6 років тому

    Visually stunning but the arrangement of the engines at the back must make for a very stressed / substantial load bearing structure around the tail and engine nacelles. also load if you sit at the back in the passenger version.

  • @flaviusalinoltean1543
    @flaviusalinoltean1543 2 роки тому +1

    SUPERB IL62 de la 334

  • @MrDouchoid
    @MrDouchoid 6 років тому +1

    Neat looking plane

  • @chanchan79
    @chanchan79 6 років тому +1

    RECUERDO CUANDO YEGABA A TIJUANA MEXICO DE LA AEROLINEA CUBANA DE AVIACION.....

  • @civilaviationin72scale
    @civilaviationin72scale 5 років тому +1

    класс

  • @prof.m.ottozeeejcdecs9998
    @prof.m.ottozeeejcdecs9998 6 років тому +2

    The Ilyushin Il-62 looked like the VC-10... don't know which was bigger, what capacity, or which was faster.

    • @awuma
      @awuma 4 роки тому +1

      see: www.airliners.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=235221#p2386029

  • @zachp7603
    @zachp7603 6 років тому +2

    What a beaut!

  • @carolus651
    @carolus651 4 роки тому

    Piękny samolot ! Czyste linie.

  • @dtiydr
    @dtiydr 6 років тому

    That was one heavy cargo (?) plane.

  • @drughiman4091
    @drughiman4091 5 років тому

    Ilyushin is made in malaysia... Proud to be malaysian!

  • @Vanadeo
    @Vanadeo 6 років тому

    Went to donnie last year but didnt see jack xD... Wonder what best days and times are for spotting?.

  • @pascalchauvet4230
    @pascalchauvet4230 6 років тому +2

    Correct me if I am mistaken, but don't the IL-62's engines sound similar to the BAC VC-10's?

    • @awuma
      @awuma 4 роки тому

      The Il-62M's engines had a bigger by-pass ratio( 2.5:1), so probably less noisy. The VC-10's Conways had a by-pass ratio of about 0.6:1, better than the original 1950's Conway with 0.3:1 (the first by-pass jet engine, a.k.a. "turbofan" today). Although more modern, the Il-62Ms engines were poorly made and maintained, resulting, for example, in two catastrophic accidents near Warsaw when uncontained failures took out other engines and the flight controls. In fact, the placement of engines in the tail resulted in several disasters for similar reasons in Western aircraft too, though AFAIK the Conway never caused one.

  • @JohnSampson
    @JohnSampson 6 років тому +1

    The Yakolev company has been working with Lockhead on the development of a recenr Russian fighter plane and opted to use features ifrom the Russian plane to improve the American fighter. I'm not going to mention which one,, you can do the research yourself. The USA would never co-operate with the Russiand on a nonmutual basis if the sharing of technology and design was not mutually beneficial. Lockhead preferred to keep this information secret until long after it became known. So, it's not as if either country is developing planes completely on their own, and that one is streets ahead of the other. Most people seem to think that one is far ahead of the other, and I have no idea where that assumption comes from.

  • @taketimeout2share
    @taketimeout2share 6 років тому +2

    I didnt know Niki Lauda was rated to fly an IL-62M.

  • @ythinder
    @ythinder 6 років тому

    Gotta love the whine of those engines!!

  • @yellowhatproductions5863
    @yellowhatproductions5863 6 років тому

    Donny airport used to be RAF Finningly in the cold war era with the british nuclear force

  • @antonclark3420
    @antonclark3420 6 років тому

    Curious to know who or what's being conveyed in that flight...

  • @neilanyon4792
    @neilanyon4792 6 років тому

    Beautiful aircraft (not quite as nice as VC10 though 😉). Might be camera position but incidence angle of stabiliser looks a bit odd as does thrust line of engines. Bet there weren't many of those at Doncaster in the Finningley days!

  • @user-yv1tk3op2v
    @user-yv1tk3op2v 6 років тому

    Woww , never seen such an arangment for the engins.
    (Double each side !?!?)
    I bet it one badass plane...

    • @awuma
      @awuma 4 роки тому

      VC-10 and Lockheed Jetstar.

  • @JohnSampson
    @JohnSampson 6 років тому +43

    This is a beautiful plane. Reminds on of the TU-160 the White Swan. Russia seems to build beautiful aircraft.

    • @AngryMushroom91
      @AngryMushroom91 6 років тому

      Thanks)))) But rear-engine planes are not good at low speeds...

    • @JohnSampson
      @JohnSampson 6 років тому +5

      Doesn't matter, it's still a beautiful plane.! And jets are not manufactured to fly at low speed anyway!

    • @kristinajendesen7111
      @kristinajendesen7111 6 років тому +6

      Copy of the VC10. Some real serious industrial espionage in the 60's.

    • @AngryMushroom91
      @AngryMushroom91 6 років тому

      John Sampson yes, but landing is very important part of fly. And rear engine planes had big problems during landings, so because of that all plane factorys decided to mount engines under wings.

    • @JohnSampson
      @JohnSampson 6 років тому

      Okay! Get your point.

  • @dmitriyrusachev2034
    @dmitriyrusachev2034 4 роки тому

    Ильюша во всей красе!

  • @goclunker
    @goclunker 6 років тому

    That was a SLOW takeoff, holy...

  • @marinkhan3066
    @marinkhan3066 6 років тому

    An old beauty

  • @Beneduzisantacruz
    @Beneduzisantacruz 6 років тому +2

    What a beautyfull and magnificent airplane,also for VC-10 wich is in the same level.

  • @mava5634
    @mava5634 6 років тому

    what is this? a cargo airplane or they forgot to install the windows?

  • @briantkill270
    @briantkill270 3 роки тому

    I thought it was never going to leave the ground 😲

  • @deseremere
    @deseremere 6 років тому +9

    Belorussian cargo plane, Rada airlines

    • @dphorgan
      @dphorgan 6 років тому +2

      CNT Yep that's what it is........ Thanks for the recap.........

    • @jafarhon
      @jafarhon 4 роки тому

      Oh thank god you told me. Cause i was wondering where the hell is the windows if this is a passenger aircraft. However one sick and beautiful looking aircraft ever seen. Souns is music to my ear

  • @bmcgoo6027
    @bmcgoo6027 4 роки тому +1

    Three questions; 1. How old is that plane? 2. Doncaster to Tripoli - is that a regular holiday destination?! 3. Why is Doncaster's airport called Robin Hood?

    • @marioshadjikyriacou3381
      @marioshadjikyriacou3381 4 роки тому

      1. First flight late 60's
      2. No it's not. Who wants to go in the middle of bombings. That's cargo most probably. No side windows on the fuselage.
      3. I don't know

    • @AviationSimulation
      @AviationSimulation 4 роки тому

      3. The story Robin hood about the girl in the red dress taking a basket of food to her grandmas house. A wolf followed her. It was set in Sherwood forest, not far from the airport. However today it's mainly known as Doncaster Sheffield airport

    • @bmcgoo6027
      @bmcgoo6027 4 роки тому

      @@AviationSimulation Ah, is that the same girl who broke into a Bear's house and ate their food?

    • @AviationSimulation
      @AviationSimulation 4 роки тому +1

      @@bmcgoo6027 I think that was a different story not sure. But the airport rebranded 2 years ago to Doncaster Sheffield airport

  • @10pinbowling
    @10pinbowling 7 років тому +8

    what was it in for?

  • @MrAlwaysBlue
    @MrAlwaysBlue 6 років тому +1

    Apparently the VC10 was better than the 707, but for many reasons that have been often debated, the British aerospace industry collapsed faster than a pricked balloon in the early 60's.

    • @kristinajendesen7111
      @kristinajendesen7111 6 років тому

      MrAlwaysBlue - not enough subsidies from the government and the Comet crashes didn't help.

    • @JDJLalor
      @JDJLalor 6 років тому

      The VC-10 was designed to a very tight specification issued in the late 1950s, requiring the ability to operate from hot, high and short runways. My understanding is that the target countries built long runways which meant that airliners built to looser specs didn't need so much power. The VC-10 had very high internal strength which ensured survival in at least one CAT incident, and having that spare power got an RAF one out of a windshear incident at Washington Dulles.

    • @JohnSampson
      @JohnSampson 6 років тому

      The Comet was bad news with it's metal vatique around the windows, and they never seem to have recovered since then.

    • @davekp6773
      @davekp6773 6 років тому

      Exactly right. By the time of the 4C it was too late.

  • @philmoseley2259
    @philmoseley2259 6 років тому

    There are no windows in that VC10ski. And I could not understand a word of the ATC chatter. I think he said Five and zero

    • @roddevereaux1830
      @roddevereaux1830 5 років тому

      Not a VC10 IL62 was in development before the VC10!

  • @dbadgones
    @dbadgones 6 років тому

    so many birds, jikes... what a stress

  • @jonjohnson2844
    @jonjohnson2844 4 роки тому

    Looks about as aerodynamic as a house brick

  • @Uruglot
    @Uruglot 5 років тому

    Ahh, this sound D-30...

  • @marciochriss
    @marciochriss 6 років тому

    If you are about to get what really matters go to 7:40 ---> SOUND