LIVE! Real Lawyer Reacts: Kohberger Finally Files COMPLETE Alibi With Corroboration
Вставка
- Опубліковано 31 тра 2024
- #lawyeryouknow #universityofidaho #moscow #idaho4
This is the UA-cam account to follow for streaming video: @judgejohnjudge
🔴 Do you or someone you know need to speak to a real lawyer about a wrongful death or personal injury case? Please reach out to our firm and we will make sure to answer your questions or find someone who can. Our consultations are always free and confidential. You can call our firm at (727) 441-9030 or email us at lawyeryouknow@gmail.com.
✅ For business inquiries contact me at lawyeryouknow@gmail.com
✅ Let's connect: www.tragoslaw.com/
Twitter - @tragoslaw
Instagram - /tragoslaw
Facebook - /tragoslaw
TikTok - /tragoslaw
✅ Join our email list here - bit.ly/33lV3Mb
✅ Get your Lawyer You Know merch here - bit.ly/LYKMerch
✅ Become a LYK Channel Member Here - bit.ly/3OecDDD
SUPERCHATS & DISCLAIMER - 1. Superchats read out are not to be taken as my opinion nor endorsed by me. 2. Questions are answered on best efforts based on my knowledge and jurisdiction.
🔴 NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Intro Music: WNAQ9M6UJF
Outro Music: 7RELUAQ9VY - Розваги
If this was a real alibi why did it take so long for him to say this? If he was innocent wouldn’t this be the first thing he would tell a policeman so he doesn’t go to jail? I sure would be screaming my alibi from the beginning knowing I’m innocent.
I do a lot and take pictures of the moon especially when it's a full moon.
That's not how justice works. You don't get to go "Well if you were innocent why didn't you say so in a certain time?"
That's why there is a fifth amendment and it's been repeatedly ruled that just because you don't defend yourself doesnt mean you're somehow automatically guilty.
Further, the alibi part is a formal part of the trial system there, it's not something you just say "because".
@@TheWorldsprayer Yes I know it’s the process but if he was truly innocent he would have said that from the beginning. But no he’s waiting for what the prosecution has in order to match it.
He didn’t plead not guilty. His lawyer would not plead him not guilty.
Because he's an oddball that doesnt operate like a normal person . He actually thinks by staying MUTE he can cast doubt .
Is it just me, or did KOHBERGER wait to see what the state has before providing his alibi?
No because they haven't provided what was asked
Yeah he would have said he was at home sleeping if they couldn’t prove the opposite
@@aliciaa5894 Dont they have campus security footage of BK leaving from his apt / parking lot in his car late that night ?🤔
The FBI cast team has had 1 1/2 years to prove their cell data is correct but they haven't come up with a final report yet. Why?
@@jeanataylor6864 yes that is why he admitted he left
One of my sons used to do a lot of late night/early morning driving after work to unwind. He had just gotten his car and enjoyed the freedom it gave him.
but he probably didn't butcher 4 people
I’ve done it soooo many times with NO witnesses before cellphones!
Just driving around? Cars should be used to complete tasks not therapy lol go for a walk.
@@Mag-us6iz neither did BK.
not your business.
I live in Moscow and frequently travel between Moscow and Pullman. I have never had issues with cell coverage (even on the backroads). I think jurors in our area will be pretty skeptical of this argument which may be one reason they want a change of venue. I suspect this argument will be more convincing to a jury not from this county.
Wow that’s a really good point, especially since his alibi is contingent on expert analysis of data specific to the location!
You’re so right!!! I never thought about the venue change in this light but now that you mentioned it.. makes perfect sense now!!! They need to keep it right where it is.. 😮😊
My next door neighbour has better signal than me. A couple of metres away. So..
Everybody has opinions...I think there is something else that is said after that. I wanna know facts
Cell coverage varies between cell services, phone manufacturers, location etc..
Seems like a lot of nonsense to me. He is dragging things out, playing games and the victims families suffer. Makes me sick.
A criminology major. He left his phone where he turned it off and didn’t bring the with him to commit the crime. He picked it back up on his way home.
That was my thought too.
Except the metadata will show his phone was moving, and the timeline doesn’t allow for this.
On top of that they used his phone pings to arrest him, so they can’t have it both ways.
Timeline doesn’t allow for this.
Criminology is not the study of how to commit crimes. CRIMINOLOGY is the scientific study of crime as a social phenomenon, of criminals, and of penal treatment. Which means how does crime affect people.
He doesn't have an alibi.
If he did, he wouldn't be in court now.
I think the guy did it but this comment is categorically and laughably false.
He is playing the vulnerable public opinion with this star gazing romance. Most likely looking for voyeur opportunities. In 1971 skeletal remains of stabbing victim found at that park, female kidnapped from Pullman
That is not true you are wrong. wrong convictions happen all the time . Recently a DA framed someone who was innocent who spent 23 years in prison wrongfully convicted. The DA lost her ability to practice law and has had charges brought against her as well as the police involved in Kansas ...Google it don't take my word for it.
@@sixthsenseamelia4695 I want to live on the planet you're on.
Frame job
I think the most telling thing in that new alibi is.... they never said "Brian Kohberger was at that park"....they said his PHONE was. It doesn't matter WHAT he was doing or whether ppl think it was normal or not. That's all a distraction to get ppl away from the fact that they can only "prove "(and NOT EVEN with their own expert-they need the states evidence), they can only "prove" his PHONE was there...not that HE was there. That's super scketchy& ANOTHER "coincidence "? Let's not all forget the crime was seemingly (obviously to many) well planned out. Planning includes covering tracks& having a plan if caught. And let's not forget, BK also specialized in cloud based forensics.
exactly. thank you. finally someone with intelligence.
He was able to kill 4 people in less than 15 minutes, and clean all tracts that might point the crime to him and conveniently dropped a K-Bar knife sheath with a small amount of Touch DNA on it? Stabbing a person is a lot more tiring than you ever think, and stabbing 4 people? Not to mention the victims have defensive wounds. The most damning “coincidence” is how in the world the roommate took 8 frking hours to call the police?
Excellent view...well said..
@ethan, I appreciate your point of view, but I would ask you this re time: how long do you think it would take someone to strike you w/that weapon if you were passed out sleeping, in your own bed at 4am? And if that 1st strike were in your back/lung area, do you think you could yell out? Maybe google some knife attack videos, pretty disturbing, but the reality is they're extremely quick especially if a person knows to hit main artery, lung area, which a premeditated murder by a suspect who studied serial killers would know exactly where to strike for immediate incapacitation. It's not like he walked into a room at 6 PM and they were all sitting around the table playing cards. They were sleeping in their own beds in the middle of the nite and were ambushed. X&K may have been awake, but X coulda been coming out of bathroom, wearing Airpods listening to tik tok& been ambushed from behind, thus def wounds, as in grabbing at the weapon as it was cutting her but was overpowered quickly. Or walked into her room as BK was behind her door knowing she was coming & ambushed her from behind. Defensive wounds means putting up your arms or legs, blocking, or trying to grab, it doesn't mean hitting, clawing scratching punching, those would be OFFENSIVE. Too long to explain KG possible scenarios , but point being, it only takes seconds to incapacitate a person w/that weapon in the dark being ambushed. As for 8hr delay, it sounds like from all legal reports there were no screams, no knocked over furniture, no commotion anymore than a normal night of ppl being up late partying in the house, which was normal, annoying but normal for them. So DM could very well have thought just that& even tho startled by BK walking by, she most likely thought her friends were being loud& partying & had a friend over that she didn't know, & went back to sleep. If she was asking Bethany what to do, Bethany probably told her, it's quiet now, just let it be we'll deal with it tomorrow. (DM was a freshman/new to the house). The other thing that backs up why she didn't call police(credit to Reporter room) is that he was so quick& stealth that X&E didn't call police either. No one did, bc nobody had time to react b4 being incapacitated due to placement of weapon, so it never sounded like anyone was being hurt at all. Hopefully this at least gives you food for thought.
@@Flonick21 thank you ! That’s exactly what makes the most sense . Sleeping , drunk , tipsy , distracted , self involved , just college kids in somewhat of a protected bubble where crime is low and never ever in a billion years thinking an attack like this could happen to them or anyone they know. It’s absolutely pre meditated . We know someone “ unique " did this , because he was smart in many ways , but also not of sound mind exactly . It had to be someone knowledgable in certain ways on how to leave little clues committing a crime . Someone smart enough to avoid detection for over a month , but not smart enough in the end to cover all his tracks , especially once the FBI got involved . Who was that person ? BK fits the bill.
Banfield is as bad as Nancy Grace , I can’t listen to either one of them ..
Same!!
Ashley’s reporting of the facts are missing a lot of the facts smh
agree!
I agree and I stopped watching them . Peter is unbiased on the legal front .
Nancy also constantly cut off her guests, can’t stand
My teen son (well he’s 20 now and in college) went just driving around at night a lot! Small town, very rural, etc. He took me with him once…3 hours of back roads and river scenes, lovely stars, and him singing loudly to show tunes (something he would NEVER do at home….he has a lovely voice but I could never get him to sing for me again.) He is such a wonderful young man with great grades and lots of friends. What a lovely memory and evening with him. Just saying on behalf of solo rural drivers (not specific to this case).
Not normal!
@@jenniferbailey5914 I used to do that too when younger before adult responsibilities really took hold hard. Alot of people do/did. It stopped entirely though when gas prices started to go up....adult responsibilities again.
How do you explain the dna????? Coincidence?? I hope people like you do not vote or drive.
Major pastime for many people where I'm from. Especially high school and college age kids. Foothills of the Adirondack mountains here and very common to lazy drive and star gaze at night. Peaceful, no traffic, and I worked late hours over 25 years of my career. Good way to unwind.
With his phone on 99.9% of the time but not the night of 4 grisly murders?
So his alibi is “i wasn’t there”. 👌
⁶66⁶😮⁵😮5⅚99⅞
That's literally what an alibi is 🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️
BK is saying he turned right towards Wawawai Park. The traffic camera should have footage of him turning and continuing on that road. That would prove he didn't turn right by the Marijuana shop. The Defense is requesting that traffic camera footage. That would prove the white elantra going to the Kings road house is a different car.
They could've chosen a white Elantra and decided to set him up. I don't believe police unless they can prove it these days.
bingo
You do realize most traffic cameras don’t record?
@@annsmith7196 where are you getting that information? they usually take photos at minimum and that is saved for a little while. sometimes a few days or until capacity runs out and it's deleted, is my understanding.
But what if the footage is no longer available- no one knew this was his alibi until now. It’s been 2 yrs. Do you mean video surveillance they already have from the marijuana shop shows which way he turned?
I live in Moscow and have been in this area since birth. There are sections even in town where there is no cell phone coverage. Also, the "countryside" is literally all around the town, it doesn't take much to get to it. I sure hope they got the right guy or we've got a problem in Moscow.
I fear for the community of Moscow. If you don’t have protection, get it now. There is a real chance there are killers on the loose.
I totally agree.
I love this channel there's actually people with open minds. I believe he's innocent the state doesn't have enough evidence they had him and ran with it. They never looked at anyone else as a suspect whatsoever. Cell phone data proves he was driving around alot
Not saying you are incorrect but somebody else said they live there in these comments under this video and cell phone coverage is fine. I want facts. I hope the expert is clear with facts. I want the right guy.
@@becklesgeckles8323you should look the expert up. He has testified over 100 times for the state. He never testified for a defence. Plus the rest of his carriere is working for law enforcement. He helped the military in Afghanistan
Before gas prices went insane, driving down random country roads was my way of de-stressing, so I can’t really argue.
My parents are over 80 and still do this, all the time! Especially when they are in florida
Between 3a-8a?
Don’t forget, he went back to the crime scene for a looksee around 9:15a, drove in front and the back of the house, stayed 10-mins., then went back home.
He can’t account for that🙃
Late at ight or early morning.?
@@dianealarcon8304 he doesn’t need to. They’re already dead at this time. Maybe he just saw it on the news and was curious.
@@dianealarcon8304 i used to go in the middle of the night. if i didn't have kids, i still would. you're also forgetting that the state themselves noted an occasion where the pings were wrong. so we cant say he went to the front and back of the house, unless he's on video. he's not on video until noon at albertsons.
Imo.. his alibi has been “created”. Defense has and will continue to piece thru the discovery to make things fit a narrative, not the truth, but a narrative.
Lawyer you know! This is such an unbelievable alibi ! It seems like they are just trying to admit he was driving around bc they know the evidence is gunna show he was driving around………
I've lost all respect for News Nation because of Banfield.
She's a 🤡
If I was on this jury, I'd really have to hear all of the evidence first. I'm not convinced for either side yet. There's too many questions I'd like to see answered during trial.
Exactly
You must have been a juror on the O.J. case, too.
anyone check out "11-11- true crime"---her theories--v. convincing about the fact he's not guilty but blames the fraternity..I was shocked that it is feasible he was framed..
@@bjs9354 He wasn't framed. He did the crime. Period. Stop with this nonsense.
There’s enough evidence to find him guilty. You should look into this case because he did the crime.
Plenty or very many places in idaho without cell service. Those are usually the places you drive off the road and end up in the river. And we do drive out of the way of city lights to look at the sky.It's a thing we do because you can see shooting stars, The milky way all kinds of things without a telescope
Ya, one of the perks of living on west coast!
How lovely to see all that this is making me want to go star gazing
Yeah a lot of places with mountains at least here in KY are known to have outrage areas but we all already expect it to be … what hurts him is that he switched off the phone and then turned it back on. Plus he doesn’t have anyone to say “yeah I saw so and so that night”
@@allisonangelaflemingwe don’t know his phone was turned off. All we know is it stopped reporting to towers for a specific amount of time. It could have been in aeroplane mode or in an area with no reception
@@QueenVee80 That can be determined, however. If his phone was in an area where it _should_ have reception, but didn't, that's fishy.
He never offered an alibi until he heard what evidence the state said they had against him….he contrived an alibi to fit.
Yes but the witness they have has never in his life testified for defence - I can’t see anyone risking the credentials this man has on something where there is zero evidence 🤔 he had already stated he was driving about but now they have been given the evidence of cameras - well they’re still holding some back) and phones they can now prove it. What they had at that grand jury to haul a man in for death row case is absolutely terrifying because there was nothing and those on that grand jury did not want to until BT basically forced them into it. Sorry, not picking on you just saw this wee comment and it’s everything that’s been in my thoughts about this case🫣🤭
Yeah, and had to hire an expert which took almost a year to put together. I honestly cannot believe how many people are jumping on his bandwagon!
They haven't given it. Defense has asked but hasn't turned it over.
@@jennyterrell6354actually less because they were suppose to have a preliminary but that got changed.
@@jennyterrell6354 lets say you were out driving to find good views for the stars. how would you prove that if you were alone? lets say you were up for a quad homicide charge and if you're found guilty you'll get the firing squad. would you just give an alibi that hadn't been proven by an expert????? i mean come on...seems common sense to me.
I lived in the Palouse while my husband worked at WSU; Moscow is a 15 ride away. And you do not have to go very far to be in a very rural area with poor or no cell service.
It is proven that he was not there that night. What more do you want? Video proof?🤣 He is innocent!
@@oderspreezander9124Yes because changing your alibi proves that he's innocent 😂
15 what? Days? Hours?
Minutes@@QBAN2010
@@crater044right? Poor cell service is very convenient.
Banfield, Disgrace, and Coffindigger are an embarrassment! How can they be allowed to throw out lies and make stuff up??? Talk about BIAS
They have nothing to do with the case so they can be as biased as they want to be
Oh, wasaaah! Kohberger groupies like you whine about people who are asserting their opinions. You don’t know all the evidence against Kohberger but 17:17 apparently, that means nothing to do.
Exactly, as attorneys are officers of the court they aren’t supposed to lie.
If lawyers, cops, judges would start getting prosecuted for lying, this behavior would drop drastically.
I stopped watching them because on a daily basis, they are putting out info from “the source” and completely one-sided. It s frustrating, how do I know if that’s actually true?! Not a fan.
@@ourstories2002 because their opinions don’t match yours. Glad you moved on.
The initial deadline for Kohberger to provide his alibi passed like a year ago. He provided it sometime after the deadline, saying that he was in the habit of driving around late at night. Now he's provided a slightly more fleshed out version. If he was innocently driving around, why not say so in the 1st place? Why not shout from the rooftops, my car might have been caught on camera, and I was out driving, but I didn't do this crime? The reason the alibi took so long to come out is that he was waiting to see how much they had on him. He knows they have evidence of his car and his phone in the vicinity of the crime, so he's fashioned an alibi around it. If exculpatory evidence could be presented by the defense, the assumptions would be different. But the prosecution's evidence so far has been strong. The defense, not so much.
It was vacated. That why he is giving it now
I recall the original alibi being due in the summer last year, correct me if I'm wrong. He missed that deadline, but then a few weeks later came up with the "I was driving around" story. I didn't catch that it was vacated. That's interesting. But an innocent man would have explained where he was as soon as he was arrested, not offered an alibi after missing a deadline. And why were the added details in his latest alibi so long in coming? If he was driving by a lake, why not say it a year ago? These are my questions.
Exactly. Plus what an alibi, I was out just driving around, in the area people who I had followed on social media and tried to message but was ignored, was murdered.
What if that was you? All you guilters should never be on a jury!
@@jennyterrell6354no one was stalked, no connection to victims, prosecution hasn't provided any evidence he was ever at the crime scene.
I did this all the time as a older teen/young adult. I got in trouble all the time for being out by myself and falling asleep in my car out in the local state park.
I bet you didn't do it while leaving your DNA at a quad murder scene... while driving the same car caught on camera multiple times with no front plate in a state where front plates are required.
@@johnscustomsaws definitely not. Lol
@@johnscustomsawspolice identified a 2011-2013 Elantra around the crime scene. FBI expert identified the vehicle. It would seem law enforcement didn't get a license plate number off the vehicle so they don't have a definite identification of the vehicle on video. Per police there were 22,000 such vehicles in the area that needed to be checked out. Did they rule out the other 21,999 Elantra's? What is the evidence the killer(s) left the house or didn't walk away from the crime scene?
@@johnscustomsaws NONE of what you said is true. His "DNA" was not found at the scene. Rather, anything or anyone who touched him or anything that may have touched him, was transferred onto a knife sheath that was found at the scene -- the knife sheath didn't kill anyone, the knife that belongs to the sheath at this time isn't even the murder weapon, and may or may not even match one of the ??? number of wounds ... And John, there IS NO photo, video, or eye witness putting his car anywhere. There is a stock photo of a car that could have been like the one he drove ... All media propaganda programmed into your mind ... Shame.....
@@jeannadysart5243so the killer touched kohberger amd then brought a knife the he transferred BK's dna onto it and left it by one of the bodies?....You must think people are stupid.
The stars and moon in Idaho are amazing! There are dead spots for the phones between Pullman and Moscow. And out at wawawai my daughter lives in Pullman that's her favorite park too. . we have many dead phone spots around the Palouse
Sounds amazing
That’s cool. His DNA was found on an object by one of the victims. Was your daughters.?
Sounds cool, but scary that she goes to same park he supposedly went.
yeah he knows that lmao
@@Jazlin92665it’s transfer DNA that the killer could have picked up off the handle at the bathroom in the local Mc Donald’s, as I understand, if what I heard was true, it’s exceedingly weak DNA evidence.
Thanks for your breakdown of this case. So far I’m NOT convinced the killer is BK 🤷🏽♀️
Wait.. so defense gets to wait until they know facts to line a story up before they file an alibi
That’s what the state argued at a previous hearing. That once all evidence is turned over an alibi can be manufactured.
They waited until prosecution locked into their timeline, time of murders. Prosecution is now locked into their narrative. How I feel about this, for what it's worth.
Check mate
Yes, you kind of need to know what you are being accused of in order to defend against accusation. Remeber, it is not the defenses job to prove innocence. His "alibi" didn't change, it was just expanded on.
@@bitchybitchyspider1437
Of course you need to know the what’s, when’s, and who’s but he could have said months ago he was out stargazing at that park when the alibi demand first came in. The first alibi was he was driving. But now he’s possibly saying he went to that park and did what exactly? I’m not American but people in Idaho have said that park is closed of a night, and others have said it was overcast in the night/early hours of the 12/13 so there’d be no stars to be looking at, and a closed park so no hiking.
There’s also a few threads on reddit that have info about Sy Ray being discredited and 5 cases where a judge found him to not be a credible expert.
Peter, i love how you help us stay balanced on these things. It’s not just a free-for-all, not just a pile-on for one conclusion. Thank you for that!❤️🌷❤️
Wow. 😮
So basically he didn’t have this version of an alibi until they had the evidence they needed to make sure the alibi fit the known evidence. Also he was driving at night but now it is to run and hike. Uh huh.
Sure, Jan. 😂
Sat in jail for a year and a half to say... "I was star gazing at 4am in the woods on a freezing cold cloudy morning..."
Well that's totally believable 🤨
Wasn't it the prosecutor that caused the delay by going grand jury instead of preliminary so he could stay there in jail?
@john
In the fog with snowy eye syndrome, yea ok...next
@@AnnaChristie-vp4ip you can look up the weather for a specific location at a specific time in the past ( Nov. 13th 2022 at 1 AM etc.) and according to Weather underground , it was cloudy all night!
@@tammyhitchcock8632You can go hiking in that weather looser.
@tammyhitchcock8632 Just curious, when you look up past weather reports do they change them to what the weather actually was? Because the weather reports I check are almost always wrong!
as someone who spends 99.9% of my life alone, this terrifies me, no one could ever corobberate my aliby if i was out driving or even if i was still at home, knowing i can be charged because i dont have friends, just because my car was seen somewhere nearby, is insanly terrifying to me. cronically single and all my old friends became crack heads so i literally have no friends or partner, this shit is crazy. the news reporter saying if her teen told her they were out not communicating with anyone, lol far out yeah because every single teen is just a blueprint of your teen right?
You could live alone and have phone data proving you were not at the crime scene due to activity on your phone.
@@beththompson417 ??????? Who did the activity on the phone? Mmmmmmmmmm.....
Wasn’t his DNA there as well? I don’t think it’s just him being in the area…
If you’re googling, playing a game etc on your phone, or if your neighbors have ring cams, you would most likely come out golden. Nothing to concern you. I’m always alone too, but I play UA-cam, so I would likely be ok too.
You have nothing to be terrified of honey. Unless you think your DNA is going to end up in a random strangers home underneath their dead body. Nothing to worry about honey. They aren’t just going around charging people that drive around alone at night. Their are multiple things tying him to these murders.
I want to see the cell phone data (photos, time stamps, etc) from BEFORE he moved to Washington, to see if he really has “long” been a hiker and midnight driver and stargazer. Or did he just conveniently start these habits when he moved close to the scene of the offense…
Sidebar: the way Peter says “cone” with the hand gestures, is the best part of this video.
There was a friend from PA who talked about going on late night/early morning runs with him when they were in college or high school. So, yes, he did do this before. If they can get that guy to testify, they can corroborate that fact.
You must not be following this case. He made a huge transition to living a healthier lifestyle. Started kickboxing, running, hiking, went vegan etc. He lost tons of weight and was thriving. It’s horrible that he was set up. He didn’t deserve this.
@@ghm692 he was NOT set up. 🤦🏻♀️
@@ghm692 "you must not be following the case" is a silly non sequitur. A person is allowed to to have additional thoughts/questions on things they've not been provided factual evidence of, without it meaning they are completely ignorant. I follow the case but do I have every little kernel of factual evidence? Of course not. I don't know that anyone does until the trial begins--and even then, there are always things we might never know for sure. Sometimes, I will share, I actually make a point to not deep-dive too much into a case of interest, as I know the internet is polluted with assumptions, jumping to conclusions, etc etc., and I try to stay as unbiased as I can going into trial. Similarly, I now have additional questions for exploration about his habits now with the additional information you've provided in your comment.
This sounds more like a rebuttal/defense than an alibi.
I think if they were able to corroborate any of his supposed alibi, they could come up with better than driving around in the countryside to look at the moon and the stars. After almost a year.
Tells me they’re grasping at straws a little, in that they’ve awaited all the discovery and are crafting a narrative as they go, which is why it’s always “more to follow…”
Not to mention they know cell phone forensics isnt really a proven science and the expert they picked has already had his credentials and methodology attacked by a judge and other experts in the field . It doesnt matter all they need is to create enough doubt by throwing all kinds of poop at the wall . Something will stick
That expert has been on 24-hrs., Dateline, True Crime, & others. He usually is on the Prosecution. First time, for the DEFENSE. He was looking over the phone pings. BK wasn't even in Moscow.
Anyone fighting for their life and their attorney would do the same thing. I want to hear all the evidence.
Always love hearing your voice of reason and experience Peter. Thats a combination so rare these days. Thank you!
Look man. I could genuinely be unbiased, follow jury instructions to the letter, and provide a verdict based solely on the evidence and arguments at trial. With that said, this is absolutely some shit a serial killer with a background in criminology with a specialization in digital forensics would do to establish an alibi lmao
he didn't have a specialization in digital forensics. where are you getting that information? i'm wondering if i missed something. also i don't think driving around to stargaze is indicative of being a serial killer. it's a thing to go find areas that have good viewing. some people even get together and have star parties. great fun.
No evidence he's a serial killer.
he wouldn’t be categorized as a serial killer. He’d be a spree killer. As it was all one event. Right?
Ya I don't think you are capable of genuinely being unbiased lmao
As confused as you sound I'm not sure you understand what it means to be unbiased.
He shouldn’t need the state’s discovery to know where he was.
He doesn't. The prosecution is not required to give him an alibi.
😂😂😂 hop u never get in this position
He was alone, driving. Do u think he has an imaginary friend that could testify? 😂He needs data to show.
@@becklesgeckles8323he doesn’t need the states discovery to know where he was. That is a fact.
@@Jazlin92665 he does to prove where he was
There are plenty of places here. I don't want to name them as they will be swarmed by the swarmers, but you can look up at the sky and it's like raining shooting stars.It's very cool
Discovery games by the opposing party is one of the most frustrating things in a civil case. I can only imagine how much this multiplies in a criminal case where someone's rights are being trampled - especially since the rules of discovery tend to be more conducive to the turnover of exculpatory evidence in a criminal matter.
There’s so much distrust between the state and the defense. Early on, Thompson replied that to his knowledge there was one outstanding lab report that he was waiting on in response to Taylor’s request for additional discovery. Then he said he can’t compel the FBI to produce discovery because they are a sovereign entity. Taylor kept using inflammatory language in her motions knowing the public would find out unless they were sealed. All this talk about “we know exculpatory evidence exists” and tainting a potential jury was the talk then. If her client had a verifiable alibi, why has he been sitting in jail all this time? Then Taylor accused the judge of misconduct and he clearly wasn’t happy. Along comes her “expert” putting knowingly false questions in his survey, admits to doing so and is angry about being called out on it? He was haughty, dismissive and arrogant as he testified he wouldn’t continue with his work but buckled under scrutiny by the judge. This back and forth is getting old, if they have irrefutable evidence he committed this heinous crime, it’s time to set a trial date, the families must be running out of patience at this point and I don’t blame them.
What I don't understand is how he can say he "knows" there's exculpatory evidence, unless he planted it. How else could he know that?
@@Angel-vb5ot it’s the specific language AT uses to circumvent the gag order in her motions to taint a potential jury, she does this hoping she can poke holes in the states evidence against her client. She has been doing this from the day she was assigned this case…
@@moxiedrapo2391 Hmmmm... seems like she must believe he's guilty, to resort to this tactic. If she believed him innocent, wouldn't she be eager to go to trial and show it?
@@Angel-vb5ot perhaps it’s why she keeps filing misleading, inflammatory motions to keep the court tied up and avoid setting a trial date.
@@Angel-vb5otI thought the State wasn't ready? Because as of now, the Prosecution has NO solid evidence to convict BK. IF the Prosecution had it, why are THEY not eager to go to trial? Why did the Prosecution tear down the house, against the victims family wanting it to stand & let Jurors see for themselves the house layout?
This is so flimsy that I might have believed he was innocent before this but this makes me think he's guilty. This is garbage.
Closing the park makes no difference unless you have it completely enclosed by a fence and you close the gates at closing. Most of the parks I go to are not completely enclosed. Many have parking lots that have gates. But not all parks have their gated closed on time or at all. And even then you can park a side street. If you're game and agile, you can scale most fences. I have 10 parks and multiple horse/pedestrian trails within 3 miles of my home, none of which are completely enclosed. People walk and ride them at all hours of the night all the time. All you need is a flash light.
💯
One of the best break downs I've seen so far .. keep up the good work man 🤙💪
I wish everyone could hear your commentary! U r the voice of reason!! ❤
Like it or not, it is a better alibi than the girls had for not calling 911 for 8 hours.
That is a great point.
And it wasn’t even them that called. It was Ethan’s friend. So they had others over at the house that morning.
They did not know how to call 911 because most young people these days don't know anything. They don't know how to drive. They don't know to yield to the right. They don't even know left from right. They don't know what a continent is. They don't know what 'quarter' means. They don't know how to multiply. They didn't call 911 because they didn't know what 911 is. Their parents and teachers have failed them.
I totally believe Bryan Kohberger is innocent!! Moscow law enforcement seems very corrupt!! And the roommates never called 911. Ethan’s friend called 911. I think the survivors were cleaning out the drugs they were selling in the house!
they thought there was partying going on. it was a college house after all.
I was someone who grew up in rural Ohio- no Internet, no cellphone until i was 18 years old in 2012 and i LOVED driving around at night on country roads, sometimes to go watch thunder storms or heat lightning roll into the fields.
I would go to the cemetary and have picnics and read at my grandmothers grave and no one knew where i was or what i was doing.
I think that this is plausible. It makes me disheartened to see so many people having bias (especially when its influenced by the media). I would hope that if someone they knew were in a situation like this, others wouldn't pass judgement so quickly. Or at least, as you said, make sure to check their thinking along the way.
Maybe too many episodes of Law&Order and cops shows have convinced us that its as simple as they make it in the shows.
But...did you leave a knife sheath with your DNA at a house where 4 people were coincidentally found deceased with knife wounds?
Did you go "hiking and running" in the dark"?
@@margaretmary1139Who says he left it? It was found there. We have seen no evidence as to who put it there.
Maybe it’s just me but if I was arrested for multiple homicides,I would probably tell the police my alibi when I was arrested and not wait until my trial.
Where is the bias? Car matches video. DNA matches crime scene. His only alibi is he was out driving in the wee hours of the night because he was an idiot and brought his cell phone.
Apps for your phone can now take pictures at a later time without you even holding your phone in your hand. Criminals can manufacture an alibi now. Not saying he is guilty but there are ways around the phone issue.
We use terms like the mountains or the desert where people back east use the term countryside
@tracy
Land without mountains and not on the beach is referred to as ????
If I was accused of murder and I had evidence of an alibi, I would have come forward and proved my innocence straight away, not 18 months later. I don’t understand why they need the prosecution evidence before they can present the defence evidence. Surely evidence is not dependant on what the other person has.
Lol..... if it were that easy. Anything that has to do with this case IS BEING HELD BY THE PROSECUTION. anything and everything that the defense team wants to provide to the court has to be done by asking the prosecution team.
@@breasilva9700the defense could just as easily subpoena his phone records from AT&T and not have to wait on anything from the prosecution…
They have to know what he is being accused of. You can’t provide alibi without know what the prosecution is saying you did. It is common to wait.
@@thats_suber He is being accused of murdering 4 college students on the morning of November 13, 2022 between the hours of approximately 4:00-4:25 am.
They alleged that on November 13,2022 at approximately 2:42 a.m., the defendant left his Pullman apartment complex and drove to Moscow.
They alleged that at approximately 2:47 a.m. the defendant stops reporting to the network, which is consistent with either the phone being in an area without cellular coverage, the connection to the network is disabled.
They allege that the defendant’s white Hyundai Elantra made multiple laps around the victim’s neighborhood starting at approximately 3:29 a.m. and ending at approximately 4:20 a.m, as captured on numerous surveillance videos.
On the defendant’s 4th and final lap that morning, his white Hyundai Elantra is seen entering at approximalely 4:04 a.m, as seen on surveillance video.
After making a series of turns, the defendant then entered the victim’s house through an unlocked sliding glass door with the intent to commit the felony act of murder.
While inside that house they alleged the defendant killed the 4 victims-three of which were in bed or asleep-with a knife.
They alleged that on or around 4:17 am, the defendant left out through the back slider and got back into his car. The defendant’s vehicle is next seen departing the area of the King Road Residence at approximately 4:20 a.m. at a high rate of speed.
They allege that the defendant took a series of back roads to exit the neighborhood before taking a 60 minute journey in a southerly route which passed through or nearby the towns of Blaine and Uniontown before eventually making his way back north back to his Pullman apartment.
@@thats_suber An alibi is supposed to be a truthful account of specifically where you were at the time of the alleged offenses and a list of the names of any witnesses who a defendant may call upon at trial to corroborate their alibi.
If your alibi is truthful, it doesn’t matter where prosecutors claim you were or what you were doing, you were either where you say you were when you say you were; or you weren’t.
Someone else shouldn’t have to tell you what you were doing. You already know what you were doing because you were the one supposedly doing it.
A truthful alibi doesn’t change based on what a prosecution claims you were doing.
Living in the Palouse, going to WSU Pullman, you did great with pronunciations! 💙
Thanks for all of your explanation and for sharing your expertise.
Brian kohberger trial: The park that he said he went the night of the killing closes at 7:00 or 7:30… NO one can come into the park, after hours. There are guards at the gate to ensure no one comes in…
I did both of those things frequently in my youth. I actually had an old school jeep and I’d drive to the middle of nowhere and climb up on the roof and stare out the sky contemplating whatever was on my mind or trying to forget it. Not saying it’s true, just plausible..
@babe
Even on foggy, icy nights?
Me too.
And no, weather has never been a factor.
Cooler air actually helps see the stars better and makes for better pictures.
Yeah winter skys are the best for stargazing! I don’t know why it’s being mocked the night sky is incredible! Xx
I did too.
@@AnnaChristie-vp4ip Sure, exposing oneself to conditions that are a bit more extreme than usual is one of the great joys of my life. And nights are wonderful because we usually don't experience much of it. Not saying the guy didn't do it, I don't know much about the case. But this whole "well, who would do this, I wouldn't and since I wouldn't I have a hard time imagening that someone else would" is getting a bit old. Different people enjoy different things, live different lives, expose themselves to different experiences. I mean, "even on foggy, icy nights?". ESPECIALLY on foggy icy nights. ESPECIALLY when it rains like the devil. ESPECIALLY diving into ice cold water. These are all things I like to use to recenter myself, put things into perspective, experience a wee bit more of the world we would be exposed to if we didn't have the things that enable us to escape these conditions.
This can all be valid, but somehow his DNA was on the knife sleeve at a murder scene. Well if there is no photo or anything else to prove he was somewhere else when the murder happened, I am as a potential completely neutral juror, it s a hard sell. Why would I trust what KB said over a DNA evidence?! 🤷🏻♀️
It's "touch DNA", famous for his false positives. Research it.
Bc that dna evidence is so unreliable it's not admissible during trial. It's touch dna, not semen or blood that would place him at the scene. It's skin cells. He could have touched the same doorknob as the killer. Also, this dna only says that he shares dna with the killer. The dna could belong to his 12th cousin.
@@void________ the dna is going to be used in trial. Not the igg , but the dna on the sheath and the dna from the swab from bk that is a match.
@@void________ I get it, and i am totally from an objective angle from comparing what we know so far from both sides. They don’t need to come up with an alibi but they chose to do so, and yet the alibi does not seem to be supported by anything other than what he said at this time. DNA, plus the car, plus the description, there are more things pointing the opposite direction, I am just saying. But opinions subject to change when more evidences present in the future.
@@ourstories2002The alibi will be supported by the expert that they call. And the things you mentioned are not solid evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt-which is an integral component of our justice system.
As always --great info and great show. Onward and forward, Thank You
always informative and insightful thank you
Sure Jan...
It makes me very angry how the media has decided that, instead of simply reporting facts, it is its job to determine public opinion. The hubris is galling.
makes me very angry how the victims families have had to wait years for a trial because the defendant is stalling
@@dwizzle2132 if the judge was sharper and the prosecution would stop stalling everything would go much quicker. To bad they want to keep the trial in Hooterville.
Agreed.
@@dougcorcoran5455amen
The news presenter is sharing her personal opinion based on a brief, digestible summary of information. This is inappropriate because she seeks to influence her viewers. She's abandoned the presumption of innocence, which is so critical to a fair trial.
This sort of conduct erodes confidence in the justice system.
I'm rolling my eyes at the 'moon and stars', given the night in question was a cloudy night.
It did seem rather flowery for a motion. But I think he was giving it to show what Brian did in the past and so that would give him a reason even on a rainy night to drive around because he likes to drive around. My best guess anyway
Thank you for covering this
Thank you for covering this so promptly.
How is it that the defense said they have 400 witnesses? Garbage!
Great channel man. Great insight. Keep it up.
We actually already didn’t know that he was an avid runner the day after his arrest. A friend from Pennsylvania was interviewed and said they used to run together late at night around 7 miles. The internet sleuths also found his Strava, which is a running and hiking mileage tracking app that showed his pace was a sub 6min mile. It’s safe to assume he’s a runner.
There's a campground at Wawawai Park. I find it so disturbing that his alibi is being ripped apart by so many people. If you live at home alone and you're sleeping in the early morning hours between 3:00 and 5:00 what would your alibi be? Who would corroborate that for you? Thank you Peter for being an impartial interpreter and breaking down information from the documents and hearings.
People have their phones to collaborate where they were, sleeping at home.
I cant believe someone said "the park is closed" like... i go to closed parka qll the time if theres no gate or my apt pool closes at 10 but i go at 2am or something sometimes to smoke a cig (bc i dont wanna bother the neighbors that have windows open)
@uggggggghhhhh too bad your public neighborhood park that doesn't have gates all around it, or your apt pool gate, isnt anything like the park in question. The entrance is on a hill, and no cars can enter or leave, during the certain times.
I do, too. Because it is INDEED plausible if he was into star gazing and astronomy. Those wee hours, before sunrise, is the ultimate time for viewing planets and galaxies and the heavens, in general. It's also the time when interference of lights from nearby cities or developments are at their dimmest. The internet and social media platforms have become the modern version of a lynch mob mentality, and I hate that. I will not judge anyone, including BK, until I hear all sides of the story and the actual evidence.
It’s not that people criticize going out for a drive at night in general. It’s that it is presented as a valid alibi, when an alibi by definition has factual proof (witnesses, cameras, data) that you were in fact at a different place at the time of the crime. This is clearly not that
😤 I JUST missed Yr live! Damm it’s so hard to catch yr lives from the UK 🇬🇧 Peter! Sorry I missed u again! But replay crew💖💖
Great video! Thanks.
"I don't always go star gazing, but when I do I make sure it's been recently foggy and currently cloudy for the full affect" Good look up the weather for Moscow ID/Pullman WA. It was cloudy, foggy in the early morning. Good look up the moon tracker information for that night...
I LOVE the way yr factual based & impartial to the max! Ty Peter! 💖💖 from The UK 🇬🇧
The way that statement reads, it didn't sound like he was saying he was in that park on that night, I read it as "I liked walking in the park, but when that wasn't possible, I went for a drive in the area instead." and the case he is making is that he was driving though that area on the night in question, so I don't think the park being closed has relevance here.
Speaking as someone who has, on several occasions driven home from the city (alone and in the evening) to my house in the suburbs (about 38km direct) via scenic routes that took me more than 200km out of my way through regional areas with patchy phone coverage for the sake of enjoying the drive, I find it bothers me somewhat that people find the concept that he might just have been out driving for the sake of enjoying the drive to be so inconceivable.
As for it being "convenient" that he was out there alone... I imagine he's finding it distinctly *inconvenient* that he has no-one who can testify as to his alibi and is left to try and prove it through data only the state currently has access to.
I'm not saying he *must* be innocent here, but his story is far from being unbelievable, and the actual evidence against him as presented so far is kind of thin. Unless and until the state proves it's case he deserves the benefit of the doubt.
Thank you!! Not sure why everyone is going with “he was running in the middle of the night”. I understood it that he drove out to that park area regularly …and there are photos with meta data and cellular tracking to prove he was there on the night /morning of the murders
I used to drive around Gettysburg area when I was bored and couldn’t sleep anywhere between the hours of midnight to sunrise . I’d take pictures of the moon and stars . I’d go to a 24 hour diner and then drive around til the sun came up . I used to do that a lot when I didn’t live in a city. It’s definitely not an unbelievable story and I also find it insulting and crazy that people seem to think that it’s too weird to be true.
Im guessing when you go on “scenic drives” through a residential neighborhood in the middle of the night you don’t disconnect your cell phone from the cell network (and do it just the one night there happens to be a quadruple murder in the neighborhood you like to scenically drive through.. yet don’t do it the other times you “scenically” drive to the area late at night)..
And then im gonna hazard a guess if you did have such incredibly bad luck to make it appear like you were trying to hide your physical location the night there just so happened to be a quadruple homicide in this seemingly random residential area you go out of your way to go to during late night hours, that you probably wouldn’t have then had even worse luck to have a car that matches your make & color caught on surveillance footage circling the street & house where the quadruple homicide occurs, passing by the scene of the crime multiple times before that car that matches your cars make & color appears to park on that street & then is seen on surveillance footage again fleeing from the neighborhood at a high rate of speed right after the time the murders are believed to of happened..
but lets say even if you do have that very very bad luck im gonna guess your DNA isn’t gonna be found on a knife sheath inside the house where the quadruple murders takes place lying next to the body of one of the victims. 🤷🏼♂️
@@mattcastg5170 Here's the thing... regardless of the odds, It could conceivably happen, and that's a scary prospect.
Funny thing about mobile phones, is that when you are in areas with poor coverage, they'll connect and disconnect from the network all on their own... Sometimes that even happens in areas with *good* coverage.
My car is not an uncommon model. I routinely see other cars of the same make, model, and colour on the road.
I don't actually plan my scenic trips, it's always an impulsive thing and when I do this I usually make routing decisions on the fly. If such a situation were developing on a night when I was out driving I would have no way of anticipating it or avoiding it.
I also suffer from dry skin and dandruff. I probably leave a trail of dead skin cells pretty much everywhere I go. It's entirely conceivable that If I sit down at a restaurant somewhere for dinner, the next person to sit in the same seat after I leave could unknowingly end up with some of my DNA on their skin, or clothing, or accessories.
I should certainly hope that I never end up in such a situation as you describe, but I also wouldn't want to be presumed guilty if I ended up falsely accused of a crime I did not commit because I happened to eat at the same restaurant as a killer and then be driving through the same general area where they committed the crime.
Only as we know. Theres more coming to this Alibi.
AND….. they’ve already spent 3.6 million on this ALIBI already--- NO WAY Change this justice system. If this is the kind of alibi what about the next morning drive by the crime scene the cell phone shut off precisely at the time of slayings ?
The destroyed lives the families should be getting at least a million each not a defense for this alibi - sMH😮
I think the state has the specific log of the Elantra. Just like they did in the murddaugh trail. The knife sheath is a bonus
When i was a high school teenager, I would drive around for hours before a big test or exam just to clear my mind and relax. I did the same thing in college. And now, as an adult and mother of 2 I will drive around the countryside or drive to the local park and sit for 2-3 hours. I call it de-stressing my day. I don't tell people where I'm going and I often don't take my phone.
Do you do it at 3am ?
@nikkimclay5474 Yes, in college, I did.
@@nikkimclay5474When I was at university I would drive for several hours and sit by the sea until 4:00am. And I assure you that many people who are in college and suffer from insomnia do the same thing.
Ok but your DNA is not on a murder victim?
@@Svet-Lana2022 BCK’s DNA was not on a murder victim either. A trace of his DNA was found on an object that was passed around several different departments. The prosecutor needs more evidence.
I also drove out to nowhere in college on the weekends. I am neurodivergent and maybe most people think that is odd, but it depends on your brain wiring. It is peaceful to be alone and see beautiful nature in the country.
His driving in the country a few times at night can also be seen as scoping out areas for nefarious purposes.
Great work, champ 🙏
In college, I did a LOT of late night driving. Just saying. 🤷🏻♀️
How many times has your DNA been found on a knife sheath under/near a dead body?
Dude was like 28. How old were you when doing that?
Seems a lot of us did.
The state is seeking to take his life, any alibi, no matter how implausible it might seem should come in
Very much agree with this. It should come in, let the jury determine its plausibility.
They go where the evidence takes them
No one is disagreeing with this
@@spacenerd9499 yes, the state does that, it's the defendant & his lawyers job to fight it
@@LinaGenXNo, the state is supposed to do this. There have been FARR TOO MANY overturns for this to be true of the state.
Saying he was out driving alone is the defense agreeing that he has no alibi. Good sign that his lawyers suck.
What?? The Defense expert, has been on True Crime, 24hr, Date Line, & more. He usually is the State witness. 1st time for the Defense. He is a excellent man that knows his stuff. He will prove BK wasn't in Moscow.
Ann Taylor is a very good Lawyer. She found this expert & he took a look at this case. He has a very good reputation. He usually testify for the Prosecution. First time for the Defense. He's been on Dateline, 24hrs, True Crime & others. He looked at this case & found that BK was never in Moscow that night. BK went in a different direction. A place where he loved hiking & yes stargazing. When one can't sleep I think that is a good thing to do. Did you read up on this new evidence & the expert?
@@deepratt1942 lol, sooo, they identified someone through cell data, and that random person happens to match DNA on a knife sheath left the stabbing scene you are investigating... and you are suggesting that an expert is going to be able to make that mean something else, something other than what is obvious to any half intelligent person??
Maybe, they aren't offering the cell data as crucial evidence, and dispelling means nothing, cz thy used it to find him, and that is already done. So they are arguing that the police should not have used this technique, cz it can lead to errors, but that's irrelevant, cz how the police find the suspect is irrelevant to the determining the guilt of the person they find. And, in this case, it led to the right person anyway, so what is he gong to say??
Thanks Peter, you’re so good at explaining law 🔥🔥😊
Rewatch crew. Just wondering if they waited this long with alibi in order to make it up around states evidence, just curious
Thank you Peter for continuing to keep us updated on this case. 💗 I am not at all surprised with BK’s expanded alibi.
Missed the live but watching now!
Thank you!
I love Anne's confidence. I'm with her all the way.
What does that even mean?
Why’s it taken her so long to go over the evidence then? The state didn’t have any more time to review it all yet then either but they’re ready immediately with what they do have. First question about her?
Me too!! Did you notice, unless it's just me. But, BK & Anne Taylor are smiling more these days.
@@deepratt1942 They're in the spotlight more these days, because the case is moving forward. Naturally, since you're seeing more of them, it would stand to reason that you're seeing more of them doing whatever they do.
I'm struggling with the concept that you, and the original commenter, have evidently chosen sides with Anne Taylor, like this is two sorts teams.
I hope I'm never accused of a crime and needing a fair and impartial jury. You folks are proof they don't exist.
@@Angel-vb5ot Lol do you even know what channel you're on? I'm not going to dignify your comments with an explanation. And please, save your time and energy and don't even reply because I'm not going to read it.
Isn’t there a time limit on when you can submit an alibi? I think it’s strange that they can go through all evidence and then provide an alibi? I’m confused about this.
They haven't gone through all the evidence tho anne is still asking gor evidence eg last week or the week before the 15th time
You are the BEST!! Ty
It's scary to think if you are someone who likes solitude and to walk or drive on your own .
Not being able to prove where you were ..could be the reason you go to jail .
I think he has been found guilty before the trial .
Rewatch crew: I was talking to Nicole in your office. 👍
As you said, BK's alibi isn't a surprise. But the coberation of him not being at the house on King Rd. is Sus.
I'd love to see what they have analyzed.
I often drive around during the day and night to explore, sit in parks, walk around. I look at houses, wildlife, and scenery, see where certain roads go, what's there. I love exploring, and I learn new ways of getting around. I sometimes can do this for hours.
You’re not being accused of killing 4 University students either.
And your DNA wasn’t found on the sheath of the murder weapon. No comparison.
That's how my parents learned the LA freeway system when they moved there for post-grad. They would drive around at night. It also helped baby me sleep.
It was cloudy and below freezing. Winter, snow, and dark.
@@lisajeter9511 no but you can be one bad investigation away from being accused of a crime. Their car picked up near a crime scene and they are a suspect
Great job Peter!
Great coverage
I think they are going to prove that he took photos with his phone, therefore his phone was not off. And perhaps the phone was not “responding to the network” when he was taking those photos.
Yeah, flight mode…
You can put your phone on airplane mode and still use the camera. So yeah, you’re probably correct.
Sounds to me that the photos are examples of his taking nature photos. I’ll bet he didn’t take any pics the night of the murders.
And putting it in airplane mode would help to conserve battery life by avoiding the phone constantly searching for a signal. He’s not dumb. Guilty, I believe, but not dumb.
That would actually be useful. Why don't they just say that then?
You went to law school. You know how stressful it is to pursue a degree of that sort, it’s even MORE stressful to pursue a PhD. You have no time for all this crap. You know this. The only time BK would have to be free from that stress would be at night late. To acquire a PhD you have to do so much research you don’t have time to even have friendships. You know this. He would have had to be a damn genius to get a degree and then do all this as well. Because whoever did do this had it well planned out. Not one person has addressed the time it take and all the stress to go through a MA or PhD program. I have a MS and it was the most stressful time of my life as far as education goes. There’s barely time to eat. Somebody needs to address this!
There’s too many coincidences that it is not him
You people have every damn excuse in the book, for that creep. By any chance, did you ever read BK's 100 comments he made when he was 16 and 17 years old, on a social platform called Tapatalk? Well, there we see BK admitting to how f**ked up in his head he was. He needed some years of serious help, which I'm sure he never received.
Do you know BK only lasted 1 semester, before getting fired from his TA job, which meant he would lose his funding. They fired him for arguing with the professor, on several occasions. They warned him, worked with him, there were several complaints from females about him. So they told him to resign, therefore his career isn't ruined. When we saw BK's dad with him in the car. BK was moving back home to PA. He wasn't coming back to WSU. BK had a furnished apartment. That's why the police found nothing of his there when they raided it. The firestick, the vacuum, etc belonged to the apt.
For what we know of BK, the dude got fired a lot. BK knew before he left that his time at WSU was over.. And since he never received any help, never had a girlfriend or friends. The dude snapped. The university denied him, the police denied hiring him. The ladies denied him all his life.. So BK committed this horrible atrocity, to prove he could commit such a horrible crime and get away with it. He needed to prove to himself that he was better and they were all wrong..
Thank you 😊
Love this community and chat. No filthy comments and not attacking each other. Watched a video with my mom the other night - I always know Peter keeps clean content.
I live alone and I would have a problem trying to prove where I am unless I called and told someone. Many times I would leave to drive to my mom's house in the middle of the night when she didn't answer her phone. So I can see driving alone at night. That's just me.
Same! I live far away from any family and am very independent, I wouldn't have anyone to corroborate my whereabouts for like 90% of my life.
I'm also a night owl and enjoy being out on my own at night. Nighttime is exciting to me 😊
The big difference is your dna wasn’t found at a mass murder
@@JJ-zr6fulot's of people had DNA at the crime scene including unidentified males. Are they all guilty?
@@dougcorcoran5455 Juliana seems personally invested in this, LOL, how sad.
Your electronic footprint would do it for you
Manchester 🇬🇧 I’m following from case and your other ones from England and I love yours and Emily D Baker’s no bull explanations of the law and situations/circumstances of the cases. Absolutely awful loss of lives of the four young people. How the hell BK is gonna get a fair unbiased jury is beyond me even with the media blackout. Deb.
From greater Manchester; in ny
Currently living inn NY
Thank you
That's a very good question