The All 6th GENERATION Jets Specifications (Explained)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 сер 2023
  • In the ever-evolving landscape of aerial warfare, the emergence of sixth-generation fighter jets marks a pivotal juncture. The sixth-generation fighter jets represent a convergence of cutting-edge innovations, from enhanced stealth and unparalleled maneuverability to seamless integration of artificial intelligence and sensor technologies. With the ability to operate in contested environments, adapt to dynamic threats, and harness the power of network-centric warfare, these aircraft are set to reshape the future of airborne dominance. Today we’ll give you the some Specifications on the 6th Generation fighter Jets such as speed, engines, weapons systems, avionics, sensor systems and so on.
    Credits:
    www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/...
    www.artstation.com/artwork/rA... - Rodrigo Avella 2021
    www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/... Rod Ave
    renderdock.com/blog- Alexander Yartsev
    nationalinterest.org/blog/buz...
    www.shapeways.com/product/VRT...
    www.globalsecurity.org/jhtml/...|||J-28%20-%20China's%20Next%20Generation%20Fighter
    www.deviantart.com/renderdock...
    -----------------------------------
    FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
    * Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
    The Buzz does not own the rights to these videos and pictures. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images removed, please contact us by email at-thebuzz938@gmail.com.
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 878

  • @VcLegacymy_own_url
    @VcLegacymy_own_url 9 місяців тому +208

    If you ever want to know what a Chinese fighter jet will look like, just wait for the US to release a picture of theirs

    • @mrkovash1
      @mrkovash1 9 місяців тому +20

      Fighter by wish

    • @serronserron1320
      @serronserron1320 9 місяців тому +47

      And somehow the engines will look like Russian ones

    • @btbd2785
      @btbd2785 9 місяців тому +3

      Well said!!!

    • @guillermoelenes4310
      @guillermoelenes4310 9 місяців тому

      @@btbd2785and what is your point? China copying American junk? I don’t think so they are not stupid to compromise their space force by copying f35 underpowered incapable of dog fighting unreliable nop the J20 it’s by any standards the best 5G fighter jet

    • @Sunabozupunk
      @Sunabozupunk 9 місяців тому

      If you ever want to know what a moron sound like, just listen to a yankee. None of the designs presented here are official or definitive, and above all the Chinese design here does not look like the American ones at all. And at least their fighter jets are not half planted on the ground like the F35 and F22 are because of too expensive and too frequent maintenance.

  • @murdercrows21
    @murdercrows21 4 місяці тому +33

    Mach 3? I bet russia just brings out an old Mig 21 with new paint and tell people like you that it goes mach 3.

    • @Steve_R-93
      @Steve_R-93 4 місяці тому +2

      and they'll have 20,000 of them within a year

    • @sheepfleet
      @sheepfleet 3 місяці тому +1

      Sounds like what your mom does every Valentine's.

    • @sanjaisharma6947
      @sanjaisharma6947 3 місяці тому +4

      Why are u so much mad on russia??

    • @murdercrows21
      @murdercrows21 3 місяці тому +1

      @@sanjaisharma6947Why are you defending that country?

    • @TALKTOMEGOOS3
      @TALKTOMEGOOS3 2 місяці тому +3

      @@murdercrows21 how is he defending ''that'' country?

  • @kabouterwesley83
    @kabouterwesley83 9 місяців тому +48

    If the F/A XX is replacing the F/A super hornet, It's primary user is not the USAF but the USN.

    • @vash_the_stampede6570
      @vash_the_stampede6570 9 місяців тому

      USN?

    • @kabouterwesley83
      @kabouterwesley83 9 місяців тому

      @@vash_the_stampede6570 United States Navy

    • @56luca
      @56luca 9 місяців тому

      @@vash_the_stampede6570us navy

    • @edphillips2998
      @edphillips2998 9 місяців тому +5

      @@vash_the_stampede6570- Yes, the USN. The world’s second-largest Air Force; the US Navy!

    • @upsidedownpeon9984
      @upsidedownpeon9984 8 місяців тому

      @@edphillips2998 isn't the 6th gen navy fighter the ngad though?

  • @Xentradi97
    @Xentradi97 9 місяців тому +17

    All looks amazing...on paper.

  • @tchevrier
    @tchevrier 9 місяців тому +77

    I'm skeptical.
    I think the trend is going to be drones and unmanned vehicles. I think you are seeing that the enormous cost of 5th generation aircraft is becoming an impediment. Even for the US.

    • @roflocopter1337
      @roflocopter1337 8 місяців тому +6

      I don't really think so, machines are too predictable. The only real advantage of drones in a dogfight is endurance, they can't pull harder G's than human pilots without causing stresses on the airframe. They aren't crafty or tricky either, all a pilot needs to do is risky maneuvers to test if the drones computer would follow or withdraw. The second the drone doesn't do something as risky as the human pilot, it becomes exploitable.

    • @tchevrier
      @tchevrier 8 місяців тому +17

      @@roflocopter1337 Dog fighting is becoming obsolete.

    • @ivanfreely6366
      @ivanfreely6366 8 місяців тому +8

      @@roflocopter1337 You're forgetting the emergence of AI. It's only a matter of time that machines will no longer be predictable. As for the stress on airframe argument, it's the other way around. A machine can pull much higher G's than a manned aircraft can, not because of the airframe design BUT because of the pilot itself. IIRC, a human pilot can only tolerate loads of 9G's for a moment or so before succumbing to it; the limit of the aircraft that a human pilot is much, much higher.
      And as OP mentioned, dog fighting is obsolete due to the range of missiles and the supporting hardware (i.e. radar, satellites, etc...) it rely on.

    • @JimmyGambino
      @JimmyGambino 8 місяців тому +9

      The technology is getting to the point that the aircrafts biggest vulnerability and limitations are the human body of pilot

    • @markymarknj
      @markymarknj 8 місяців тому +1

      @@ivanfreely6366they've been saying for 50-60 years that dogfighting is obsolete! Guess, what? It's still relevant. What if restrictive rules of engagement rule out BVR? What if other factors bring the combatants to the merge, i.e a dogfight? If dogfighting is so passe, then WHY does Russia continue to design and build fighters that can do it so well?

  • @betterlifeexe4378
    @betterlifeexe4378 9 місяців тому +6

    The Hello Kitty AK really got me

  • @user-yq1rc1ti2l
    @user-yq1rc1ti2l 7 місяців тому +13

    Ощущение, что десятым поколением будет шар.

  • @craigb47
    @craigb47 7 місяців тому +4

    Cant wait to see these planes files on the WT forums in the coming years!!

  • @alexdovbysh67
    @alexdovbysh67 9 місяців тому

    Thanks so much!

  • @ChaChaDancin
    @ChaChaDancin 3 місяці тому +1

    Cool how this channel gets all specs for jets that don’t even exist yet. Amazing intel.

  • @bjornnordstrom
    @bjornnordstrom 9 місяців тому +7

    Sweden have changed the status to ”observer” in Tempest project. Sweden based company SAAB seem to have plans of their own.

    • @dayros2023
      @dayros2023 4 місяці тому +1

      Next generation planes would be far too expensive to develop for a small country like Sweden.

  • @drgonzo305
    @drgonzo305 9 місяців тому +38

    NGAD has long since had its first flight, they were flying before Covid hit

    • @porpus99
      @porpus99 9 місяців тому

      Yep. Generally, what the US shows you is three to four generations behind what they are actually able to produce. Russia and China like to show their top of the line. For China is usually ripping of American and Russian technology. Take the F-22. An impressive plane that sets the standard for 5th gen fighters to this day (and the foreseeable future even after its decommissioned), but its first flight was in 1997.

    • @nadtz
      @nadtz 9 місяців тому +5

      They flew a demonstrator which is just that, to demonstrate stuff. It was/is a proof of concept which could be as simple as testing adaptive cycle engines in an existing airframe for instance.

    • @larryc1616
      @larryc1616 9 місяців тому +4

      ​@@nadtzit's coming out shortly after first B21 deliveries in 2024. NGAD is based on the same B21 gen6 technology. Building the NGAD will be much faster than the B21 ⚡️🇺🇸

    • @nadtz
      @nadtz 9 місяців тому +2

      @@larryc1616 "Faster" is kind of relative as it's projected for 'the 2030's' right now but who knows maybe we will see an on time or even early completion without massive cost overruns for once.

  • @Pirata-888
    @Pirata-888 7 місяців тому +2

    Para 2040 toca en España.. A ver si hay suerte y vivo para verlo.. Gracias por el video y la información...

  • @cwk789
    @cwk789 9 місяців тому +23

    i like that Mig-41 design

    • @ChickenFighter-xy3mf
      @ChickenFighter-xy3mf 9 місяців тому +7

      Exterior mounted missiles for a „stealth interceptor“. The Mig-41 design is by far the most stupid in this list.

    • @user-zj7vb7cm3y
      @user-zj7vb7cm3y 9 місяців тому +2

      it's worst design !!!

    • @ilijaspasojevic7031
      @ilijaspasojevic7031 9 місяців тому

      @@ChickenFighter-xy3mf Well, that's typical Russophobic, anti-Russian propaganda. Nor does anyone know what the MiG-41 will look like. And this addition of rockets on the wings, as with the 4th generation aircraft, is clearly done on purpose, in order, as usual, to humiliate and insult the Russians as incompetent, primitive and similar nonsense, because if the Russians were really like that, they would not during 2023, in the middle of a major military conflict between Russia and the whole of NATO (only the war is being fought on the territory of Ukraine, and Ukrainians are being killed on purpose, so that Western soldiers don't have to die... Classic Western meanness!), and 1.5 years from when the heaviest and harshest sanctions that have ever been imposed on any country in history were introduced to Russia (and by the way, the first sanctions did not last from February 2022, but even from 2014, which means almost a whole decade!), Russia, despite all the difficulties, for the first time after In 2013, since recently, again the 10th strongest economy in the world, with a tendency to be even higher on the list of 10 strongest economies..!

    • @dustmite31able
      @dustmite31able 2 місяці тому

      Weapon bays reduce drag and improve maneuverability . Weapon bays improve speed I mean they even have secondary armament concealed and the gattling cannons with a bay door . Everything is concealed and lessens the chance of detection.

  • @yvroyya8051
    @yvroyya8051 7 місяців тому +5

    the next Ace Combat is going to be sick

  • @josephramos3140
    @josephramos3140 7 місяців тому +3

    Do you know the predator movie where the alien itself or the predator could camouflage himself whenever he wanted? Hope they will make that kind of secret features to their 6th gen Fighters

  • @mhobin12
    @mhobin12 9 місяців тому +6

    And most of these on the list are 5th gen fighters still in development

  • @user-ol1qm9ey7g
    @user-ol1qm9ey7g 9 місяців тому

    ชอบการออกแบบเครื่องบิน 3 แบบที่อยู่ด้านล่างสุด

  • @apuuvah
    @apuuvah 9 місяців тому

    Thx

  • @muhammadalikhan3886
    @muhammadalikhan3886 9 місяців тому +3

    Countries producing 5th generation jets faced many problem in the 5th generation jets...and dreaming about 6th generation fighter jets

  • @Bless_sky
    @Bless_sky 9 місяців тому +8

    과연 5세대 전투기와 6세대 전투기가 얼마나 많은 차이를 보여줄지... 큰 차이가 없다면 6세대가 아니라 사실상 좀 더 발전된 5세대 전투기일 것입니다.
    미국이 6세대 전투기 개발에 성공한다면 F22랩터를 판매할 수도 있고 이로써 막대한 개발비용을 어느정도 충당 할 수도 있겠지만 다른 개발국들은 예산을 회복하기 불가능합니다.

    • @pike100
      @pike100 9 місяців тому +7

      The U.S. will not be able to sell the F-22 because that assembly line was dismantled (converted) several years ago.

    • @user-tp2zb6fj7f
      @user-tp2zb6fj7f 9 місяців тому +3

      @@pike100なるほど
      ほとんどf35の生産ラインに改良されたんですよね?

    • @richardbias9041
      @richardbias9041 8 місяців тому +3

      22 can’t be sold congress passed a law

    • @Perfectly_Cromulent351
      @Perfectly_Cromulent351 7 місяців тому

      I doubt those f-22 airframes will be in good enough shape to sell by the time the US’ 6th Gen. fighters become active.

    • @diollinebranderson6553
      @diollinebranderson6553 7 місяців тому +2

      ​@@Perfectly_Cromulent351dumb logic. Right now even with 5th gen figthers, countries still use 4th gen fighters

  • @daleknisely6890
    @daleknisely6890 9 місяців тому

    Interesting

  • @zeroxfour
    @zeroxfour 9 місяців тому +6

    This video is the perfect representation of a media class that has no concept of the world outside the media.

  • @doodleydoo
    @doodleydoo 2 місяці тому +1

    Türkiye starts also with the designing of 6'th Generation fighter jets.

  • @dominickefrim3088
    @dominickefrim3088 9 місяців тому +8

    Nothing about the US's ambitious programs to use slave autonomous full sized wing drones to fly formation with the NGAD and capable of carrying out independent dog fighting or mission specific perimeters?

    • @jccalventephotography5096
      @jccalventephotography5096 5 місяців тому

      I think all 6th are supose to do that. At least european FCAS will do.

    • @dominickefrim3088
      @dominickefrim3088 5 місяців тому +1

      @@jccalventephotography5096 actually the Europeans are not even near as advanced as the US in drone technology or stealth capabilities...
      Nobody is.

    • @dabbingraccoons6416
      @dabbingraccoons6416 4 місяці тому +1

      True the NGAD fighter will be accompanied by possibly up to 6 drones. Some will be designated as fighters to lighten payload of the fighter while some are electronic warfare or reconnaissance based. Some can even be fit to be stealth bombers with air to ground missiles for specific operations

    • @dabbingraccoons6416
      @dabbingraccoons6416 4 місяці тому +1

      Hell they could even take a missile for the fighter if it somehow runs out of flares or missiles if the fighter can be detected in the first place

  • @fedordanie
    @fedordanie 9 місяців тому +1

    the moment a Hello Kitty painted GEN6 shots you down...

  • @nephite84
    @nephite84 5 місяців тому +1

    With the way things are going, they're will likely be only one european 6th gen, a chinese 6th gen and the US twinned project 6th gen (looking almost indentical)

  • @JimmyGambino
    @JimmyGambino 8 місяців тому +3

    Its not a stealth aircraft if you have fixed hard points or carried missles on the outside. So it would be a 4.5 gen but it definitely wouldn't be a 6th gen fighter

  • @jjstolethefish
    @jjstolethefish 7 місяців тому

    Feels like I'm watching the news 😂

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 9 місяців тому

    I like this powerful fighters jets

  • @MarkLandrebe-ef5yd
    @MarkLandrebe-ef5yd 2 місяці тому

    MIG-41 -- mach 4+ (??)
    Some of these countries must produce quicker than 15+ years, from now.

  • @HeresTheGenZFlorentineFolks.
    @HeresTheGenZFlorentineFolks. 6 місяців тому +5

    I hope that the Future Combat Air System won't be a complete failure like the A400M progam was. The fact they say 2040+ looks like they have no idea of what they're doing, everything looks so uncertain...

  • @rugbynimbus
    @rugbynimbus 5 місяців тому +1

    Hybridized UAVs are a very likely path. At this point, humans are the weak link in fighter aircraft operation -- G-force limitations as well as the added weight of life-support systems and on-board avionics are impeding what's really possible.

  • @ThePoobird
    @ThePoobird 4 місяці тому

    Ok, who made that Hello Kitty mig?

  • @cityplanconsultores2188
    @cityplanconsultores2188 9 місяців тому +2

    el diseño del MIG-41 no se parece al diseño que circula por internet

  • @NationChosenByGod
    @NationChosenByGod 9 місяців тому

    @The Buzz I don't think Sweden is joining the GCAP; however there's been report that Saudi Arabia wants to join the program.

  • @cestall1
    @cestall1 9 місяців тому +1

    You realize that we are all being conned....these planes exist, because OTHER planes exist, because these planes exist....etc

  • @Mark-lv1ub
    @Mark-lv1ub 8 місяців тому +1

    Big inaccuracy at :21, where the artificial non-intelligent voice says the 6th gen aircraft will offer "unparalleled maneuverability"; 6th gen aircraft will prioritize stealth and speed at the expense of maneuverability. Many will not even have vertical rudders, hence less maneuverability.

  • @nephite84
    @nephite84 5 місяців тому

    Can somebody confirm for me whether the Japanese Jet has been totally cancelled, due to them joining Tempest. Plus, it looks like the FCAS and Tempest projects may join together. If not, Germany is looking potentially to join the Tempest program, scrapping the FCAS.

  • @CrossWindsPat
    @CrossWindsPat 9 місяців тому +16

    If we weren't caught up in politics and showboating we would already have the perfect platform for a 6th gen fighter that would have been so refined and polished by now... Yes I am of course talking about the YF-23. Never forget humans made that beautiful craft...

    • @yomama629
      @yomama629 9 місяців тому +7

      In what universe would the YF-23 ever fulfill the requirements to be a 6th gen aircraft? It wouldn't be VLO enough, it wouldn't have the networking, data fusion, or AI capabilities for it, and it wouldn't have the adaptive cycle engines that are being developed for NGAD/PCA. You can argue all day about whether it would have been better than F-22 (I personally don't think so, or at least not by enough to matter) but to argue it would have been that much more advanced is absolutely asinine

    • @mylesharvey6488
      @mylesharvey6488 9 місяців тому +1

      ​@@yomama629it absolutely is 6th generation with updated avionics.

    • @pike100
      @pike100 9 місяців тому +1

      ​@@mylesharvey6488The YF23 isn't even close to being a 6th generation fighter. 😅

    • @yomama629
      @yomama629 9 місяців тому +2

      @@mylesharvey6488 yeah no not even close

    • @carlosandleon
      @carlosandleon 8 місяців тому

      Yf 23 was a trash plane if you bother to look into it

  • @terrealexander4442
    @terrealexander4442 9 місяців тому

    Macross Plus is almost here😊

  • @CausticLemons7
    @CausticLemons7 9 місяців тому +40

    4:38 The Russian Air Force is typically abbreviated RuAF [Russian Air Force] or RFAF [Russian Federation Air Force] to distinguish it from the RAF [Royal Air Force] of the United Kingdom.
    I follow a lot of the news and developments of these programs, but I still enjoy your videos as a summary/overview/refresher for the general state of the industry. Keep up the good work!

    • @Voen_Sveta
      @Voen_Sveta 9 місяців тому +8

      Russian Air Force is typically abbreviated FP, meaning Flying Pidors

    • @stephenhassert6616
      @stephenhassert6616 9 місяців тому

      @@Voen_Sveta 🤣🤣🤣

    • @NationChosenByGod
      @NationChosenByGod 9 місяців тому

      And they suck.

    • @cowbertnet
      @cowbertnet 9 місяців тому +1

      uh actually, the Russian Air Force is typically abbreviated VVS (even & specifically in NATO publications)

    • @CausticLemons7
      @CausticLemons7 9 місяців тому

      @@cowbertnet Yeah, but for casual discussions in english I've seen RuAF more than VVS. Even the VDV is often referred to as "paratroopers" instead of their actual name.

  • @f1reguy587
    @f1reguy587 9 місяців тому +1

    The US helps its associates, but it still keeps some exclusive things in house, just in case..

  • @white-dragon4424
    @white-dragon4424 9 місяців тому +18

    I wonder when they'll start developing remote controlled drones instead of manned fighters? They've got the tech now, so it's perplexing that the next gen are still manned. All they need do is have a room full of VR simulators and satellite connection, and there's no reason why the "pilots" would even need to leave their country.

    • @Dwendele
      @Dwendele 9 місяців тому +6

      That would just lead to unfriendly countries targeting satellites.

    • @serronserron1320
      @serronserron1320 9 місяців тому +4

      The US Air Force already has certain classes of autonomous fighter jets like XQ-58 and turkey will release autonomous fighters next year.

    • @khyronthethunderhawg6577
      @khyronthethunderhawg6577 9 місяців тому +3

      You just need to kill the uplink and the aircraft goes stupid. Plus there is a latency in SATCOM that would be deadly in aerial combat. If you move the control cab to within LOS of the air vehicle, that would alleviate some of this. But these would not be that close to the front lines.

    • @white-dragon4424
      @white-dragon4424 9 місяців тому

      @@Dwendele Warplanes will probably be controlled via a network of satellites rather than just one or even two. It'd be like a military version of the Internet. If one gets knocked out then there'd be another to act as backup. There'd also be transmitters on bases and warships nearer the conflict.
      Maybe Trump is right about at least one thing, that we've gotten to the point where we'll need "Space Forces" by militarising space with things like armed satellites? I guess after that we'll then need to have transatmospheric warplanes? Some might snigger at this and see the US Space Force as a bit of a joke, but so were the US Army Air Corp (later the USAF) and RAF in the early days of flight.

    • @JohnFrumFromAmerica
      @JohnFrumFromAmerica 9 місяців тому +5

      Man/machine systems outperform machine systems at the moment. The maned component will operate as a central node with drones.

  • @MacElMasMancoDeTodos
    @MacElMasMancoDeTodos 7 місяців тому +1

    Don't get me wrong, but it's the first time I see a female talking about military stuff...and she does better than a few channels.

  • @IndyRockStar
    @IndyRockStar 4 місяці тому +1

    Any country can draw pictures of a Jet and write a list of specs. The only countries capable of actually building those plans are very very few.

    • @CagedPaps
      @CagedPaps 2 місяці тому

      That's what this video shows though. Most countries on earth have tiny air forces, the most powerful are on this list. India has built gen4 with 5 sort of there, but using US components. Countries like Saudi Arabia, Turkey etc will just be customers. Though the Saudi's wanted in on Tempest. Countries like Brazil, Canada etc, they'll just be customers too.

  • @bub99554
    @bub99554 9 місяців тому +1

    FCAS looks like a mix of a f22 and a bit of su57😂

  • @marleyboy7732
    @marleyboy7732 9 місяців тому +1

    Only a speed of 1243mph. Sooo trying to pee in a coke bottle would be challenging then? LOL

    • @hybrid6ix885
      @hybrid6ix885 4 місяці тому +1

      Their plan is to replace higher speeds with stealth and maneuverability technology.

  • @rungfang27
    @rungfang27 9 місяців тому +3

    You should also spell out Russian aerospace forces some people confuse RAF Royal Air force with RAF Russian aerospace forces just ssying

    • @johnbodman4504
      @johnbodman4504 9 місяців тому +1

      That is a important point, I picked it up straight away. The Buzz should have known that.

  • @rambo410
    @rambo410 9 місяців тому +1

    Everybody will copy whatever the USA designs. The PAK DP is an awesome design

    • @kendallbedford2523
      @kendallbedford2523 9 місяців тому

      Now which one of those will hit approximately mach 2 and I believe we have a scram jet which has bomber capabilities that can fly into outer space and strike as well.

  • @m0rph3u5.
    @m0rph3u5. 9 місяців тому

    For a "6th Gen" fighters, which will be released around the same time as 6th Gen consoles, the graphics/models are pretty Playstation 1 grade >< they need a better 3D Modeller.

  • @gustavotriqui
    @gustavotriqui 4 місяці тому

    How many hundreds of drones can you build with the cost of any of those?

  • @jessef88
    @jessef88 Місяць тому

    Id like to see Germany do a solo project designing its Jet Fighter. Use Mercedes as the designer see what they come up with.. is what Id do 😂

  • @i.ibraev3462
    @i.ibraev3462 9 місяців тому +15

    MiGs have always been high speed

    • @henriquelopes4305
      @henriquelopes4305 9 місяців тому

      😂😂😂😂😂

    • @TeoDP7
      @TeoDP7 9 місяців тому +1

      Speed does not mean everything

    • @dm1i
      @dm1i 9 місяців тому +5

      Of cource speed is not everything. And most of countries do not require such fast aircraft, but it's a very useful feature for Russias defence.

    • @baltarbb4969
      @baltarbb4969 9 місяців тому

      @@dm1ila defensa? Ruzzia suele atacar a otros.

    • @brasidas2011
      @brasidas2011 9 місяців тому

      Mig 29s want to know why they got robbed.

  • @theguy8412
    @theguy8412 9 місяців тому +1

    So I was told that Canaards are not stealthy, how come a few designs here have them?

    • @mojothemigo
      @mojothemigo 9 місяців тому

      Those are guesses, not actual prototypes

    • @user-px9gv9tt5p
      @user-px9gv9tt5p 7 місяців тому

      Because people in some countries don’t want to believe that China has stealth fighters

  • @andrewdavies3584
    @andrewdavies3584 9 місяців тому +4

    Another conclusion finding video on technology platforms that do not reveal most of their actual specs (because they are all classified)

    • @davve54321
      @davve54321 9 місяців тому

      Because the do not exist yet

  • @AlekseyDegterev
    @AlekseyDegterev 7 місяців тому

    Если не ошибаюсь, чтобы соответствовать 6 поколению нужно, чтобы ни какие ракеты снаружи не висели, только в специальном отсеке внутри корпуса, для лучшей незаметности

    • @S.I.A_097
      @S.I.A_097 7 місяців тому +1

      это и в предыдущих поколениях нужно было делать,для 6 поколения нужно большее.

    • @SV_RW
      @SV_RW 5 місяців тому

      6-е поколение должно выходить в ближний космос и иметь противоспутниковое вооружение.

    • @user-uz1xh2ho9s
      @user-uz1xh2ho9s 4 місяці тому

      7 поколение ты должен иметь хоть одну ядерный отсек с ядерным двиглом более 20 маха.

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 Місяць тому

    Realy I like this powerful fastest fighters jets

  • @cz287cj
    @cz287cj 9 місяців тому

    faxx speed seem much slower than ngad

  • @Naveenkaroliya
    @Naveenkaroliya 9 місяців тому +6

    Su30mki

    • @SUNNYSTARSCOUT365
      @SUNNYSTARSCOUT365 9 місяців тому +6

      That is Gen 4+ aircraft

    • @tipoomaster
      @tipoomaster 9 місяців тому +5

      Lmao what
      Nice plane but definitely 4.5 gen

    • @siliconcore
      @siliconcore 9 місяців тому +2

      dude that a 4th gen plane

    • @ion8264
      @ion8264 9 місяців тому +1

      su30mki is a indian made su30 specially for iaf and its a 4.5 gen jet@@siliconcore

    • @ReinhardSchuster
      @ReinhardSchuster 9 місяців тому

      After Socialism Russia is 30 years behind.

  • @dariosanchez4587
    @dariosanchez4587 9 місяців тому +1

    El ultimo es tripulado?0

  • @Manuel_Fal_Conde
    @Manuel_Fal_Conde 9 місяців тому +1

    Самолёт 6 поколения - это беспилотный, малозаметный, гиперзвуковой самолёт с большой полезной нагрузкой.
    Всего этого пока не достичь.

  • @wr6392
    @wr6392 9 місяців тому +153

    Everyone playing catch up with the United States. As far as Russia, they can't even produce a 5th generation aircraft yet. SU57 is 4+ at best with a few examples produced

    • @w.allencaddell6421
      @w.allencaddell6421 9 місяців тому

      Most of Russia wants Putin out anyway. And he know it.

    • @locoman888
      @locoman888 9 місяців тому +52

      US is playing catch up in missile technology.

    • @wr6392
      @wr6392 9 місяців тому +11

      @@locoman888 we'll be just fine

    • @Jabba.Da.Hutt_
      @Jabba.Da.Hutt_ 9 місяців тому +22

      @@locoman888they aren’t but ok

    • @BigSmartArmed
      @BigSmartArmed 9 місяців тому

      That's a hard cope you got there. F-22 is obsolete and F-35 is a total failure. Now seethe!

  • @betterlifeexe4378
    @betterlifeexe4378 9 місяців тому +6

    I'm surprised they don't talk about hybrid engines versus purely hypersonic engines... I'll have to do more research on then mig 41 but it sounds like both of The US jets are using hybrids and that makes a big difference. somehow I doubt the mig 41 is a hybrid. If someone has more information on this feel free to share.

    • @betterlifeexe4378
      @betterlifeexe4378 9 місяців тому

      Actually I kind of got the mig 41 as specified will ever be made

    • @cubed0724
      @cubed0724 7 місяців тому

      Look up Hermes fighter jet.

    • @betterlifeexe4378
      @betterlifeexe4378 7 місяців тому

      @@cubed0724 big fan of the quarterhorse engine.

    • @user-vz2go7of1n
      @user-vz2go7of1n 6 місяців тому +2

      Су 57 признан лучшим самолётом в мире , он гораздо лучше F-22,F-35

  • @RayWright-lm5if
    @RayWright-lm5if 9 місяців тому +1

    AIR CARBON IN A GOOD WAY SIR YES SIR ETC... PS. AL, WAY EINSTEIN U GROVE ALL ...

  • @Asukii776
    @Asukii776 7 місяців тому

    Honestly the only jet that look six generations is the NGAD and F/axx

  • @Aventador100
    @Aventador100 7 місяців тому

    did you use AI to generate that voiceover?

  • @man.69.
    @man.69. 8 місяців тому +1

    don't care what everyone else says about Russia....that design looks hawt

  • @aunderiskerensky2304
    @aunderiskerensky2304 9 місяців тому +3

    good GOD the mig 41 is absolutely sexy as fuck though. visually it is just superb. not a big fan of the big red star, but damn what a fine looking jet.

  • @mrsiborg
    @mrsiborg 9 місяців тому

    That Russian thing is an odd setup, twin seat and a single engine.

  • @sahapmanogi
    @sahapmanogi 8 місяців тому

    Best design ever the first falling to USA the second China and the third France and allay!

  • @AlexanderTch
    @AlexanderTch 9 місяців тому +1

    LIes. Only countries with 5th generation jets can create 6th generation jets. Recently only 3 countries in the world have them - Russia, China, USA. Mig-41 will also be able for short time leave atmosphere and enter outer space, Earth orbit like spacecraft.

    • @benchapman2401
      @benchapman2401 9 місяців тому +2

      Well, it's funny that.. As the F35 is a 5th gen fighter designed jointly by the USA and numerous allies. The UK, specifically being a tier 1 partner and able to make adjustments to the aircraft without US permission. All countries, no matter how large or small, the contribution paid for its development and build/designed various components

  • @mitch9651
    @mitch9651 23 дні тому

    Leonardo SpA, which will deal with electronics among other things, defines the aircraft no longer as being of aeronautical interest but aerospace, capable of dominating air, land, sea, space and cybersecurity and will be able to act as a mobile platform connected with other peripheral “systems” (including space bases, spacecraft and satellites), piloted and unpiloted (including swarms of drones), thanks to artificial intelligence and super computing capabilities. The aircraft itself can be flown remotely or autonomously (unmanned).

  • @zackolmert9622
    @zackolmert9622 6 місяців тому

    So PLA has an AESA radar for their copy of the SU-27 but Russia still does not have one lol?

  • @darcdiego14
    @darcdiego14 9 місяців тому

    It’s funny his half world heading out to fifth GEN or even fourth GEN yet

  • @davidsegal2236
    @davidsegal2236 9 місяців тому

    Anybody else notice the hello Kitty jet? 😂

  • @Necrophobic2013
    @Necrophobic2013 7 місяців тому +2

    Now I'll go and create my concept of the 6th generation, you'll be amazed at its characteristics. And to be honest, it's ridiculous that so many countries present their concepts, I understand there are big powers that have cool military equipment in reality. But all sorts of small ones, even the same European Union taken together, which even the 4th generation has not been able to complete, it's a clown)).

  • @m.a3914
    @m.a3914 9 місяців тому +19

    Both NGADs look a lot more impressive and everything else here. They look so so futuristic and apparently they would be veeery big.

  • @flavio4003
    @flavio4003 3 місяці тому +1

    Brazilian President Luiz Ignacio: why throw billions and billions in the electoral fund instead of developing cutting edge tech like other countries ? This may answer why we're a hundred years behind ...

  • @dedurocortorum365
    @dedurocortorum365 9 місяців тому +3

    4:39 primary user : RAF ? Russian Air Force.

  • @mediador9161
    @mediador9161 9 місяців тому +1

    But I don't understand, GCAP is going to produce two fighters with the same technology that is tempest and f-x or just the tempest redesigned for the needs of Japan or a new fighter?

    • @Blackreaper95
      @Blackreaper95 9 місяців тому +2

      F-X was to expensive for Japan to do alone so GCAP will likely be a multi role aircraft that is able to suit the needs of each country involved like F-35 pretty much.

    • @afterthefact6708
      @afterthefact6708 9 місяців тому

      Supposed to be a new fighter. 6th gen hallmarks are stealth, datalink and long range.

    • @fromfareastindy8234
      @fromfareastindy8234 9 місяців тому +7

      Tempest in England is the name of the plan.
      It is designed to research, develop, and demonstrate the technologies needed to develop a stealth fighter within an international framework.
      Japan's F-X is simply the name of the Fighter-X program, or the next-generation fighter procurement program.
      There have been several F-X programs in the past, and it has also been called FS-X.
      In this procurement plan, Japan built its own technology demonstrator, the X-2, for the same purpose as the Tempest, since no existing aircraft was selected as a candidate.
      The G-CAP is a completely new aircraft development program in which countries with the same objectives share the cost of developing a new fighter aircraft rather than developing one alone based on their years of research.
      Of course, Japan and the U.K. are advanced enough in technological research and development to fly a demonstration aircraft, so G-CAP will bring together the technology and knowledge they have accumulated to make it more advanced than past demonstration aircraft.
      They do not consider their plan to be the development of a sixth-generation fighter.
      The conditions that would qualify it as a sixth-generation fighter do not exist anywhere in the world.
      What they are aiming for is a fighter that has capabilities that the F-35s owned by Japan, the United Kingdom, and Italy do not have.
      Naturally, it is assumed that the F-35 will be operated together with the F-35, so all functions, including datalink, will be able to work together with the F-35.
      Since the U.S. is responsible for the highly sensitive F-35 datalink system, U.S. companies and the government are actually involved in the development of the G-CAP.
      The fact that the two U.S. allies, the U.K. and Japan, have teamed up with each other is of great benefit to the U.S.

  • @joshm3484
    @joshm3484 4 місяці тому

    00:50
    MiG-4 Hello Kitty?

  • @leob_v2
    @leob_v2 4 місяці тому

    Based on this, it's interesting to observe a difference in strategic thinking between Russia and the rest. Russia's replacement for Mig-31 looks for it to be even faster (4 mach) and capable of defending against hypersonic missiles and satellites, while the rest seem to be happy with 1.5 mach. Any insight into why others don't consider speed of that much concern?

    • @user-ux7hd3jb2m
      @user-ux7hd3jb2m 4 місяці тому

      The US already tried that out with the SR-17 Blackbird. Its seems that stealth and maneuverability are the future with jets. You dont need speed when you have satellites.
      Edit: I think drones will take the place of speedy jets as well.

    • @joshtheking1772
      @joshtheking1772 Місяць тому

      Speed is fine from point A to point B but in a dogfight no one cares about point A and point B, its about survival. The target that stands still will always be killed first.

  • @redorange
    @redorange 5 місяців тому

    That J-28 looks like a bad copy of the F-117 from that top view.

  • @2damecold
    @2damecold 3 місяці тому

    I wonder what's going to replace the sexy F-35

    • @joshtheking1772
      @joshtheking1772 Місяць тому +1

      Probably an Orbital Insurgency System.

  • @niclasrenner470
    @niclasrenner470 4 місяці тому

    The best Stealth Tech have the Aliens...

  • @hugotico2008
    @hugotico2008 9 місяців тому

    I wonna see the 8th and 9 generation

    • @larryc1616
      @larryc1616 Місяць тому

      Unfortunately you won't live long enough

  • @GauntletKI
    @GauntletKI 9 місяців тому

    Lots of those look like 5 gen

  • @fredtedstedman
    @fredtedstedman 9 місяців тому +1

    Fa/XX and F/X look good , some of the others just plain GOOFY !

  • @Juvenalh.00
    @Juvenalh.00 4 місяці тому +1

    Sin duda los cazas rusas son lo mejor que hay , no pueden comparar con el fallas-35

  • @ramonsrgravidez598
    @ramonsrgravidez598 9 місяців тому

    There is country waiting the expose of other concept to design their concept

    • @afterthefact6708
      @afterthefact6708 9 місяців тому

      If all you do is poorly copy, you will never lead.

  • @briankgarland
    @briankgarland 9 місяців тому +1

    Only one nation can pull this off in a meaningful way. Yeah, you know which one.

    • @ste9856
      @ste9856 7 місяців тому +1

      Did they drop two atomic bombs on civilian? I have a guess

    • @briankgarland
      @briankgarland 7 місяців тому

      @@ste9856 No, they prefer to starve people by the tens of millions.

  • @srxanmansuroglu5440
    @srxanmansuroglu5440 6 місяців тому +3

    Usa

  • @JIuC9LLIb
    @JIuC9LLIb 7 місяців тому

    Прошу прощения, может я чего не понял, но ПАК ДА - это дальний стратегический бомбер и он разрабатывается Туполевым, а Микоян разрабатывает МиГ-41, а это разные комплексы

    • @megashield_og
      @megashield_og 7 місяців тому +1

      не вдумывайся, такие каналы часто говорят что попало

    • @iven1995
      @iven1995 7 місяців тому

      Надеюсь что его не примут на вооружение, потому как этот самолёт просто ужасен по своим характеристикам и абсолютно бесполезен. Уже сама его концепция неправильна

    • @megashield_og
      @megashield_og 7 місяців тому

      В любом случае это лишь прототип, его могут вообще забросить, хотя вероятно либо выпустят его либо создадут другой вариант @@iven1995

    • @Felix-bj1pe
      @Felix-bj1pe 4 місяці тому

      Проект истребителя-перехватчика шестого поколения, разрабатываемый в России в рамках программы ПАК ДП (перспективный авиационный комплекс дальнего перехвата).

    • @Felix-bj1pe
      @Felix-bj1pe 4 місяці тому

      @@megashield_og Проект истребителя-перехватчика шестого поколения, разрабатываемый в России в рамках программы ПАК ДП (перспективный авиационный комплекс дальнего перехвата).

  • @SUNNYSTARSCOUT365
    @SUNNYSTARSCOUT365 9 місяців тому

    Hello 👋👋

  • @ModernCowboy78
    @ModernCowboy78 9 місяців тому +12

    How do country’s go from 4th gen to 6th?wouldn’t some of these just be 5th gen?

    • @Jasonth131
      @Jasonth131 9 місяців тому

      F22 and F23 are 5 Gen

    • @ModernCowboy78
      @ModernCowboy78 9 місяців тому +10

      @@Jasonth131 yes they are and now the US are developing 6th gen. Since China and Russia are the only other countries with 5th gen I’m not sure how these other countries are skipping a generation.

    • @gangstermonke7716
      @gangstermonke7716 9 місяців тому +2

      @@ModernCowboy78most of these have been planned before the f35 j20 and su47 and yiu cna skip a generation as many of these nations have had F35’s in the past or now such as the uk so yeah

    • @ModernCowboy78
      @ModernCowboy78 9 місяців тому +10

      @@gangstermonke7716 But procurement of another country’s F35 5th generation and building your own are two different things

    • @gangstermonke7716
      @gangstermonke7716 9 місяців тому

      @@ModernCowboy78 yes but when you buy them you are givin details about the aircraft etc such as engines design etc

  • @user-bp7gy2lq4g
    @user-bp7gy2lq4g 9 місяців тому +3

    There has no 6.generation jet in China. There only has J10 pro

    • @calvinblue894
      @calvinblue894 9 місяців тому +3

      You missed J-35 and J-20..
      Where are you? In 2001?

  • @616CC
    @616CC Місяць тому

    How come the Chinese can easily hack us but we don’t even try to hack them 🤔

  • @tomriley5790
    @tomriley5790 9 місяців тому +2

    At the amount these thigns are going to cost - the US will have the biggest airforce with 3 planes, China 2, every other country will buy 1 plane.

    • @afterthefact6708
      @afterthefact6708 9 місяців тому

      Depends on scale. If you manufacture enough the total cost actually falls. What many people overlook is the USs vast experience with this kond of tech. The B21, the new stealth bomber, will take DRAMATICALLY less to maintsin and upgrade because it was designed from the ground up with that as a consideration. For all intents and purposes the B21 IS a 6th gen airframe.

  • @emersonribeiro6664
    @emersonribeiro6664 9 місяців тому

    fighter wonders The Buzz,😍🤩💋✈✈✈