Sailing into the Future: The 10 Forthcoming Aircraft Carrier Concepts Revealed
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 січ 2024
- Embarking on a new era of maritime prowess, forthcoming aircraft carriers promise to redefine naval capabilities globally. These mighty vessels, at the forefront of naval innovation, boast advanced technologies and strategic designs. These behemoths represent the next frontier in naval power. As nations invest in these floating fortresses, the seas anticipate the arrival of vessels that will shape the future of naval warfare. Join us as we explore the impressive and diverse world of the ‘10 Future aircraft carriers’.
------------------------------------
Credits:
www.globalsecurity.org/milita...
daydaynews.cc/en/military/968...
modern-warships.fandom.com/wi...
www.renderhub.com/pxfpxd/type...
navalpost.com/babcock-and-hhi...
www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/...
• Enterprise (CVN 80) Su...
-------------------------------------
FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
* Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
The Buzz does not own the rights to these videos and pictures. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images removed, please contact us by email at-thebuzz938@gmail.com. - Розваги
As long as they stop naming carriers for politicians. Personally, I like the historical carrier names or battles: Saratoga, Lexington, Yorktown, Midway, etc. Another Nimitz would be fine.
I'm Australian and have no agenda here, but I feel that you're right. They should be named for significant Naval battles or Naval personnel of note.
Politicians have nothing but ego to offer unless they have served in the USN.
USS Aggressor could be perfect name
You're just jealous. @@honfmeilingfleet957
Have to agree there. Politicians shouldn't get naval ships named after them.
USS William "Bull" Halsey
As a US Navy veteran who served aboard USS Ranger CV-61. I recommend a new Ranger join the fleet. As well as Saratoga, Lexington and Kitty Hawk. A return to traditional names. Instead of pandering to political expediency.
YES.....THANK YOU!!!!!
At least G Ford, Nimitz, GHW Bush and the JFK actually were actual in the war stink sailors.
There is a part of me that desperately wants USS Normandy to be the first in a long line of, well, can't be frigates since CG-60 is a Ticonderoga, so it will have to be cruisers.
Amen.
Yorktown,Wasp,Hornet, bull Halsey, Niagara,John Paul Jones
CVN-82 should be named Saratoga.
Why Yorktown was a better ship.
I consider naming CVN-82 "USS Lexington". When was the last carrier to bear that name? That name has got some historic value within the US Navy. Not as much as Enterprise, but still significant in it's own right.
sadly the US navy has confirmed that carriers will keep getting people names, Lexington might be used for one of the LHA/LHDs though
India Be the Next China?|
ua-cam.com/video/XRwZp1DLjgc/v-deo.html
USS Lexington CV-16 is a museum ship. Sadly USS Midway is the biggest museum ship…no supercarrier museums.
@@henrychu495 Start a grass roots petition.
I'll sign it.
Yorktown, not Lexington. (I knew a guy that served on Lexington at Corral Sea and Yorktown at Midway. Talk about bad luck!)
CVN 82 my thoughts would be to name it after the first USN carrier USS Langley
The man Langley didn’t actually fly. So, no.
CVN-82 USS lexington. Why? Because it's a carrier name
CVN 82 name suggestiom Yorktown, because of the Revolutionary battle at Yorktown.
USS John C. Waldron, commander of Torpedo Squadron 8 at the battle of Midway. Awarded the Navy Cross for attacking the Japanese carriers though the squadron lacked fighter cover. The entire squadron was lost but drew the Japanese fighters down to the deck leaving the carriers open for dive bombers to attack.
That’s very worthy!
Excellent choice!
That puts you in direct conflict with the guy above who suggested it be named for ADM Mitscher
That attack by Torpedo Eight, took real guts! I hate to think of the horror those poor crew members of Torpedo Eight experienced, they saw it coming, there was no escape and, one by one they died.
I served aboard the Waldron, DD-699. I'd rather than name go to another destroyer.
CVN-82 should be named USS Eugene Ely. The first to take off from and land on a ship. I also think he was responsible for developing a number of naval aviation techniques and devices.
What about USS Jimmy Doolittle?
Make that lead ship of the doolittle class drone carrier with an innovative automated launch hanger so drones can land on the deck at the same time.@@tankythemagnorite9855
I agree for both and now I'm upset neither have a carrier named in recognition of their contribution to naval aviation
CVN-82 should be USS Ernest E. Evans. The guy who rushed the most powerful Japanese fleet that ever sailed, with a Fletcher class destroyer.
Already given to a planned Flight III Burke. DDG-141.
@@peterson7082 ok
Awesome!
CVN 82 should be named after William. F. Halsey
If they ever want to add a general's name again How about Douglas MacArthur, Omar Bradley or George S. Patton.
I agree. Admiral Halsey deserves the tribute.
@@impacking I agree with Halsey as well. If they can name a carrier after Eisenhower, I also favor naming one after MacArthur, and Patton as well.
To be named after another fallen sailor who posthumously earned the Congressional Medal Of Honor
The Brits. They KNOW how to name ships!
The Brits have all the best ship names.
🇬🇧👍
@@Venezolano410esqueleto
@@ZboeC5Why… because one is named after a Queer and the other one after a Queen?
@@ZboeC5To make up for their lack of actual quality ships.
good video excellent video great data you are beautiful the buzz you are good at information
USS Hornet CVN-82. In honor of CV-8.
Unlikely as long as we keep flying super hornets as our primary aircraft aboard carriers
If Possible CVN-82 may name USS Constellation
Constellation will be FFG-62, first of class for her class of frigates.
ins vishal is a different project it will be a nuclear powered carrier but because india cannot make more nuclear reactors till 2030 (they are making nuclear submarines first) so a sister ship of vikrant class is under construction(will start ) because indians need 3 carriers but their nuclear powered one will take some time to build and it is seen as replacement of vikramaditya so by which they want 1 more carrier so they are doing easy task before hard one.
USS Arizona after the Lost at pearl harbour
Or USS Nimitz
Nimitz might take a back seat, but Arizona is a Block IV Virginia boat.
There not naming a ship Arizona
The new carrier should be called USS YORKTOWN the only carrier to be at the battle of the Coral Sea and Midway.
CVN 82 name suggestion: Clarence Wade McClusky. Naval aviator and famous dive bomber pilot from the Battle of Midway (1942). A native of Western New York, I feel a Rust Belt city like Buffalo deserves to have a ship named after its most famous naval aviator.
also he was the captain of the Casablanca-class escort carrier Uss Corregidor
Very good suggestion. I agree.
@@christopherhanton6611 I hadn’t read into his time as an admiral much. I’ll keep that in mind.
People like that have Destroyers named after them.
I'm also good with Essex, Wasp, Hornet, Iwo Jima, Franklin, Kearsarge, and JJ Clarke.
Essex, Wasp, Kearsarge and Iwo Jima are already in use on the LHD's
I vote for Hornet. It would be good to once again have an Enterprise and Hornet cruising the seas under the banner of the Stars & Stripes.
USS KITTY HAWK
I'd like to see Ranger or Langley come back.
I second the uss Langley or uss hornet
Langley would be cool. Though one of the other WWII carrier names would be good too.
0:50 Actually, the Fujian should be able to carry about 70 aircraft. A reasonable air wing would consist of:
24 J-35 fighters
24 J-15 fighters
5 J-15 electronic warfaire
5 KJ-600 early warning
10 Z-18 ASW
2 Z-18 search and rescue
I don't know if any ship was named after him, but how about CVN-82 USS James Dolittle, the commander of the strike force who lead the attack on Tokyo in April 1942.
If you want to create content, pay attention to details, your image of 003 is incorrect.
And hire a real narrator.
CVN-82 Ranger
The aircraft carrier shown as a soviet carrier is not Russian, it's the USS John F. Kennedy, with an F-14, S-3 and two H-60's on deck. The next carrier should be named after AMM1 (Aviation Machinist Mate 1st Class) Bruno Gaido for saving the Aircraft Carrier USS Enterprise in combat during the battle of the Marshall Islands here; ua-cam.com/video/leHyweKAWEo/v-deo.html Later during the Battle of Midway AMM1 Gaido and his pilot Ensign Frank O'Flaherty were shot down, captured, tortured and murdered by the Japanese Navy. They were weighted down and thrown overboard from the Japanese destroyer Makigumo & drowned.Thanks for sharing. Best Wishes & Blessings. Keith Noneya AT1 USN/USNR-TAR Retired
❤ watching from romania
Admiral Frank J. Fletcher Coral Sea/Midway command.
CVN 82 could be named U.S. Grant. Presdent Grant was instrumential in the reconstruction after the Civil War, despite a coropt adminstration
CVS 82 Halsey
There is already a Burke class destroyer named Halsey DDG-97
USS CHESTY PULLER
I say yorktown or lexington.
CVN-82 The USS Robert Heinlein. A graduate of the US Naval Academy who had his very promising Naval career cut short due to tuberculosis. The former Lt. Heinlein would eventually become of the founding authors of Science Fiction and was awarded its first Grand Master Award.
CVN-82 should be USS America, which was the name of a previous aircraft carrier as well as being named after the country.
USS America is in use, first of a new class of Amphibs.
@@Harldin You're right. I forgot about that one.
One suggestion for CVN-82: The name for this carrier should be Marc Andrew Mitscher. He commanded the US carriers (Task Force 58 or 38) during the Pacific War and participated in the Battle of Philippine Sea and the Battle of Leyte Gulf in 1944. He also commanded the carrier Hornet in 1942 while it transported the B-25 for the Doolittle Raid.
This is one of the better proposals for sure. Even better it's a name that hasn't been used before and highlights and memorializes another of our heroes.
Great idea. But two combatant ships and NAS (now MCAS) Miramar is named after him (Mitscher Field).
@@kayakutah Agree. But this is not the same league than a CVN. So I think it still should be a honor for a ship to be named after this Admiral.
And if the US has no names left, they could name it the USS Dönitz. 😉
USS Mitscher, currently DDG 57, previously DDG 35
@@carstenwagner3355 Did someone mention donuts???!!! Yum...!
How about CVN-82 USS Intrepid!
Since Flat tops are named oft times for heroes, how about The USS John McCain?
Is that the same John McCain who covered up the attack on the USS Liberty by a foreign country?
Expensive targets
CVN-82 should be named Saratoga, Ranger, Lexington, Yorktown, Hornet, or Wasp. Yes, I’m a sucker for the WWII Aircraft Carriers.
I am happy Doris Miller is being honored. His story is exemplified by the discrimination of making black people in the military do menial jobs yet this guy showed they gave as much value as anyone else to our ranks with his heroism during the attack on pearl harbor. I would like to see a USS McClusky or any of the many other heroes of Midway since that was one of the defining battles for the US Navy.
I think they should name CVN-82 USS Kittyhawk.
Another "Shitty Kitty"?
USS FORRESTAL CV-59 82-84
name cvn82 NEIL ARMSTRONG
For CVN-82, I'd go Challenger or Columbia for the former space shuttles. However, I like the current trend naming aircraft carriers after ex-Presidents ...except the Enterprise, you gotta have an Enterprise carrier in the fleet. Could you imagine if they kept the registry numbers like Star Trek? Enterprise could be CVN-65-B. :D
CV-6-C...
Agree about the Enterprise..
Maybe elect a President Enterprise?😉
well the new navy missile sub class is name after district of Columbia , and a Los Angeles attack class sub to USS Columbia (SSN-771)
I respectfully disagree, no us navy ship should ever be named after any *politician* of any era, party affiliation or accomplishments. Politicians are public servants and no ship, city, street or any other thing should be given over to those who serve the people.
Ex presidents who had served in the military. As for Doris Miller (CVN-81), he was not a president but a Distinguished Cross recipient.
Interesting. You still need to work on the vernacular english and the pronunciations of some of those acronyms. They're hard even for native English speakers. Overall your speech is clear and easily understood. As for CVN82, I think they should call it the "Dwight D Eisenhower". Seeing as they will probably be well into the process of scrapping the first one by the time they get around to commissioning CVN82. He was a leader well worth honouring.
I doubt they will scrap the Eisenhower, Mothballed in reserve maybe, or even sold. BTW I served on the Mighty IKE 87 to 91.
The voice is computer generated.
All that firepower , but cannot protected the southern border.
is the CV carrier concept itself out of date? Should we move insted to something like drone carriers and or ordenance ships?
No. There is nothing that projects superpower force lke a 100,000 supercarrier with an airwing of generation 5 and eventually 6 manned and unmanned combat aircraft. That's why the Chinese are busy building 2 carriers the size of the Ford class right now, and have plans for more in the next decade. Russia and India are even planning to build them. And the UK just built two carriers (the Prince of Wales and Queen Elizabeth) that are the size of the old Midway class - 70,000 tons full load.
Yeah especially after the advents of hypersonic missiles,they are high priority as well as vulnerable targets 🤔🤔
Yea, cause nothing projects power like a drone buzzing in the air. Super scary
@@Nemesis_678 They've always been high priority vulnerable targets. That's why they travel surrounded by powerful floating air defenses. And carriers are like wasps, you kill one all you accomplish is to have its family gang up on you.
@@johnbrobston1334 air defenses can always be overwhelmed and about that wasp analogy the rest of the ships can't do much except launching missiles in retaliation at enemy ships which they would be already doing in war
bruh that indian carrier is a direct copy of the british HMS Queen elizibeth
I think that was the Queen Elizabeth
@@AudacityHimself I think it was one of the renders for the Indian one
Uss Midway.
Personally, I don't think Russia need a carrier at all! Also , why do the French build one big expensive carrier, when two smaller cheaper carriers would make more operational sense??
French grandstanding, and a lack of Money. CDG was supposed to have a sister or sucessor but cuts cancelled the program. As bad as the Royal navy now is in terms of size, the french navy is even smaller.
Educate yourself - with CV's size has its benefits.
that Russian one is still a concept, you get that sinking feeling.
CVS 82 should be called USS Bill Halsey after one of the US Naval admiral of WW2
Recall a destroyer already is
@@peterson7082 Correct. DDG-97
at 1:16, you imply that the carrier pictured is the incomplete Soviet Aircraft Carrier Ulyanovsk....it is actually the USS John F. Kennedy (CV-67) that has since been de-commissioned and is waiting to be scrapped.
CVN82 should bear the name USS Michael Murphy. After the US Navy Seal officer who won the Medal of Honor.
Someone should pay attention to your graphics. The 003 is reversed and someone should have figured that out each time you added a follow-on carrier. Angle deck is always to port and the island is to starboard. Plus the 003 is in trouble as they were supposed to have started sea trials in 2023, much of what I've seen is that they are having problems with EMALS.
The first aircraft carrier built keel up was the USS Ranger CV 4 and the USS Ranger CV 61 was decommissioned in the summer of 1993. Many of the active carriers carry equipment that was on previous carriers, such as anchor chain or anchors. And since almost everything is scrapped or sunk not much is left to be utilized.
It took the Americans with all their vast experience and knowledge of operating CATOBAR carriers 5 or so years to get EMALS up to scratch, China with zero experience is going to find it very hard work to go straight to EMALS.
I think they should name CVN 82 the USS Nimitz in honor of Chester W. Nimitz the admiral who led us in world war 2 in the Pacific.
The current USS Nimitz may still be in service when the time comes to name 82 so that is not likely to happen
@@nphil93992 Actually, they planned to retire the Nimitz once the Kennedy was available to replace her. Originally, they were going to do it when Ford was ready, but Ford took so long they gave Nimitz another short term refit to keep up the fleet numbers.
CVN-82 America
There is an amphibious ship named USS America
USS John Paul Jones ,USS Olaver Hazzard Perry, USS Gettysburg,USS Bonhome Richard aka USS Bonnie Di ck 10:23
I suggest the USS Midway after the first all carrier naval battle in history.
El Fujian tiene 318 metros de eslora no 300.
She's the first female to explain military weapon in my opinion
AI generated female voice.
@@davidpage3893 but she sound a little bit different
USS Nemesis CVX-1 ?
CVN 82 may be named Star or Spangle.
I think USS Forrestal, after the first super carrier ever built & a former Secretary of the Navy.
America bringing the HEAT on aircraft carriers.
Do not name CVN 82 MaoTzeDong, please.
It would be cool to name the next 2 ford ships after doris miller "hornet" and "yorktown" to be with uss enterprise
CVN-82 should be named USS FAFO (joking)
Uss John Wayne " the duke battle group, motto rough and tough and don't take shit off nothing ..... Like navy tp"
The USS FDR
Taken by an Arleigh Burke class
Uss Audey Murphy he won the ngma and he was a hell of a fighter
Navy with few exceptions like carriers and a handful of frigates and the odd destroyer doesn't name vessels for Army persons.
Well.... of that little lot the Fujian and Kennedy are in the water and being fitted out. We can look forward to seeing them in the near(ish) future. Enterprise and (probably) 004 are being constructed. We should see them sometime during this decade if all goes to plan. The others are all in the planning stage. Ranging from Enterprise (definitely happening) to Shtorm (extremely unlikely to happen).
The 003 has huge problems with the catapults(why they went for Electromagnetic catapults on a diesel is beyond me) and the flight deck cracking in half under its own weight. I doubt the 004 is going to be built anytime soon
@@drgonzo305 I was aware of the issues with the catapults. Not a surprise given the problems the Yanks have had with theirs. I have seen the pictures of the 'cracks' on the deck. I very much doubt they are cracks in the deck itself. My own guess would be that they are cracks in the non-slip surface applied to the deck. Not great but nowhere near as serious as a crack in the deck itself.
The Shtorm will not be built. Neither will the Lider class "destroyer" or the Tupolev PAK DA.
@@JonMartinYXD I call it the shitstorm
@@barrymiller3385 USS Doris Miller is under modular construction, now that USS John F Kennedy is in water and will soon relieve one of the dry docks.
USS Forestall would be a good name for CVN 82 in honor of the first Secretary of Defense and the world's first supercarrier.
I've been wondering why no nation has tried to make a carrier that has the landing area running aligned with the ship, but down the port side, have the "island" more towards the back of the ship like the Gerald R Ford class, and have the catapult area directly in front of the "island" along the starboard side of the ship, this way both can be aligned into the wind, and both can operate at the same time.
That's the point of the angled flight deck. To allow aircraft to land whilst others take off towards the bow of the vessel. Simultaneous operation has been around since the 50s. The added bonus of an angled deck means if an aircraft botched its landing, it has the ability to take off again without interference to aircraft lined up at the catapults.
In wartime they could launch 2 planes, it's not like launching a plane is quick.
@@DOI_ARTS Technically with 4 cats as currently equipped, US bird farms can quickly launch their birds off all 4 cats ALMOST simultaneously if needed to get a sortie in the air.
The only president names that can be used had to have served in the us armed forces
Not explicitly
nope.
Its should be called the USS Archer. After the great Stirling Archer.
One thing I noticed, these carriers don't seems to be designed to take advantage of VTOL planes, which seem to be in the near future for aircraft. Instead, they just use the same big island runway concept and are putting in electromagnetic launchers. The launchers are a great achievement, but if VTOL isn't that far off why keep putting the time and money into putting them on carriers? Instead of a big island, why not put more emphasis into launch doors, plane elevators, and cargo space so when military planes are refitted for VTOL the carriers are ready take advantage of that? I mean I imagine with vertical takeoff carriers could double or more the number of planes they can launch at one time, so why not plan ahead for that?
Also like the suggested USS YORKTOWN
You put the picture of Fujian upside down.
And the length of the Fujian ship is 320 meters, not 300 meters, The width is equal to Ford, 78 meters wide.
The ccp aircraft carriers are just a floating scrapyard, until it is sunk, probably because of its very poor quality😆
Why not USS Leyte Gulf?
CVN-82 How about admiral's William Halsey or Ray Spruance or General's Douglas MacArthur, George Patton, or Omar Bradley?
MacArthur, you have got to be kidding?
@@codyhilton1750 If they can name one after Eisenhower, why not MacArthur?
@@larryparks9595 MacArthur was a phoney. Caught with his defenses down in the Philippines after Pearl Harbor. Didn't approve the MOH for General Wainwright. Invaded the Philippines just so he could say "I have returned" when the Chiefs of Staff disapproved. Didn't think China would intervein in the Korean War. Truman fired him. Burned down the Bonus Army villege in 32 when told by the President not to cross the bridge. Awarded the MOH in 42 only to boost moral (note Wainwright).
Cnv-82 should be named Sullivan
If you are referring to one of the Sullivan brothers, there is already a ship named after them all: USS The Sullivans DDG-68
How about the Avengers 😊
As an American, I love your accent!! :)
its AI
@@colinf.1198 Hmm 🤔 Idk
@@colinf.1198 I don't think it's AI, She frequently makes pronunciation mistakes like someone who's English is not their mother tongue.
@@colinf.1198Think again.
CVN 82 name suggestion: James T. Kirk ;-)
Or William B.Adama
Or John Sheridan
It makes you wonder what nuclear power plant(s) as well as how many the 4th Chinese carrier will use?
I would be a little surprised even with the general r4 supercarriers coming into service if we have multiple wars on multiple fronts including Russia China and Iran retiring the old aircraft carriers might be out of the question
These are all subject to whatever wars or other thing's that come up plans change all the time look at the F-22.
Iran doesn't have aircraft carriers. Has never had an aircraft carrier
@@markgranger9150 .....ok?
I would say the USS Kitty Hawk or the USS Lexington it should be name of the carrier does not name yet or be name the USS Yorktown
Without doubt this ship (CVN 82) of course named after a great, brave Vietnam Veteran John C.McCain Navy pilot and U.S. Senator - USS JOHN C. NCCAIN (CVN 82) sounds great😊
USs Hornet
"Fully Indigenous design", why must you mock us???
Type 004 is a pipe dream.
Why would any country spend billions in building aircraft carrier unless that country envisions having to wage war far from its homelands in the future?
To defend against a nation that use Carriers to bomb nations around the world??
Do you know WWII history at all? Like any of it?
@@ZboeC5 Yes I know few things about WWII, What is it that you're referring to exactly?
Putin and China say hello, that's why.
@@CarreraTrackOntheFloor Well Hello, But why not the USA since it invaded more countries than Russia and China combined, and remind me when was the last time China started any war?
Plus how would a Carrier help in repelling invasion?
Though Miller is well deserving of having another ship named after him, I can't help but feel that there is another African-American sailor, for whom this ship should be named. The sailor that comes to mind for this honor is Ensign Jesse L. Brown, the first A-A to complete the USN's basic flight training program. The relevant reason for his name being a better choice, rather than Miller's, is that Brown's NEC is the whole reason that Aircraft Carriers exist in the first place, its complement of aircraft and their daring pilots. As for Miller, given that his moment of distinction happened aboard a Battleship, it makes sense to name a ship that is the USN's modern analog and a vessel class that has become the Ship of Heroes, the Arleigh Burke Destroyer.
CVN 82 Should be named USS Republic
"Hayes", you know that guy that came after useless Grant. And while I'm not a fan of naming ships after politicians, I can be a fan of naming CVN-82 either Lincoln or Hayes. naming a cruiser with Presidents names would be ok, but naming Destroyers after Presidents is Crazy. And as a personal after thought, naming Submarines after cities or states is nuttier, akin to naming Tug boats after NFL Teams. Right, enough rambling, give the names of ships as the USS Ship Naming command wants. I'm retired - but I still vote, putt my vote in for USS "Hayes" CVN-82. I can sit back and watch their heads explode.
Is it my imagination, or is the narrator Chinese? Makes me wonder where this video was produced. Could be robotic, I suppose . . . .
India
Thanks @@johnwang2882
@@johnwang2882 Possibly, but I still think Chinese. Whatever it is, it sounds VERY robotic.
Reminding me of the UK carriers, Korea's CVX shouldn't have twin islands. It looks so obscure!
Twin islands are a smart idea, as if one gets taken out the other can take over their controls😜