SUBCOMMANDERS - Vengeance for the Doom of Kavzar - Dogs of War vs. Skaven Massive 4v4 Battle
Вставка
- Опубліковано 23 сер 2024
- In this MASSIVE Subcommanders battle on Total War Warhammer 3 Immortal Empires, Vengeance for the Doom of Kavzar is at hand, as the Dogs of War and City-State armies of Tilea team up with the Dwarfs and Bretonnia to take on a Skaven Vermintide Alliance of Ratmen, Beastmen, and the Pirates of Sartosa in a 4v4 clash of titanic proportions.
Subcommanders 4v4 - Dogs of War vs. Skaven - Total War Warhammer 3 Immortal Empires
Cataph's Southern Realms - steamcommunity...
Duke's DDN - steamcommunity...
I love the Subcommanders series!!! Makes it feel like actual Total War. Fingers crossed for more of them
I really appreciate the extra effort you and the players do to bring us more of this titanic battles, subcommanders seems a LOT of work. You are awesome!!
There is truly something special when the battlelines stretch properly across the entire battlefield
Pity our monogods game was corrupted but they were all good fun. Great commentary, and always nice to see the game look so much more spectacular in the videos than it does on my own machine while I play it
which faction were you playing as?
@@Flicky669 the game that corrupted I was the border princes as infantry, this one the beastmen infantry - I had an evening of all infantry without realising, i was the infantry in the lizardmen one the other day
Honestly, I think Subcommanders is the only way I enjoy Total War Warhammer content. Thank you for putting these amazing pieces together!
Love the Southern Realms Mod, its fantastically done - Hoping the CA devs add something similar... after Chaos Dwarves, of course.
Yeah, but it will be less in quality and $14.99. People that still give CA money is mind boggling to me with their anti-consumer practices. They even added the blood dlc again. They just love spitting in your face as you come back for more. Reminds me of the relationship between Blizzard-Activision and their playerbase. Almost like stockholm syndrome. Sad!
@@JagerFrostTroll the blood dlc is once again just a one time purchase
@@JagerFrostTroll I'm all for holding CA accountable to good business practices, but your whole statement is ridiculous. If you don't want it, don't buy it. If they release DoW DLC that is worse than Cataph's mod, then remove the mod, then I'll complain. As it is, comparing them to Activision Blizzard is just insulting and hyperbolic.
Considering that they can't even put a roadmap that vaguely states what they plan to do this year apart from the 3 dlc I doubt they have thought very far beyond the chaos dwarfs right now.
One race pack the chaos dwarfs and two lord packs.
And I swear if I see another skaven dlc.
@Haakonson you just sound bitter. The DLC for this series has, all been worth it, on sale. Also, the blood DLC is just a one time thing. If you bought it over HALF...HALF A DECADE ago, it applies to game 2 and 3. Jesus effing christ, this conversation again?
I love the subcommanders stuff, wish they made it a proper game mode
Subcommanders is always a blessing! Thank you and the other players for playing and covering this great battle 💕
Yessssss. Your last video showed me DDN, and I love it so much. Me and my brother have been enjoying the balance of DDN a lot more than vanilla, and I am glad to see you making more videos with the mod
Love to hear it as a member of the community as well.
In this and the last sub-commander game the only deciding thing was, who had the most big monsters. I don't see how the infantry mattered very much despite the overhaul
Yeah this battle was over before it even began.
or the team that won just played a bit better in both games? The game before this one was a 4v4 Dogs of War/Empire/Bretonnia vs. Monogods (replay got corrupted unfortunately), and the Order factions won despite having almost no single entities, and the Chaos armies having a bunch of big scary monsters. I think it's maybe a bit early for takes like this. I dont even have a good grasp on faction strength or balance in this mod yet after playing a chunk of games, kind of hard to simplify it down to "take more monsters and win" after watching two battles that aren't even how battles are normally played. I think we can all agree SEMs can be very good though
@priest it definitely wasn't lol, this is too simplistic and reductive analysis that takes away agency from the players and what they did to win or lose. We played the exact same teams in Order vs. Monogods right before this, and Order won with almost no single entities or monsters, and monogods (which feel very strong in the mod, as in vanilla), having a bunch of big scary monsters. And Order won just with a bunch of infantry and cav. Simply put, its extremely difficult to have a good grasp on balance for a mod after watching 2 battles, especially when theyre this complex and large in scale
@@milkandcookiesTW i hope i will be shown wrong then in a battle that you can show us (i love it when mortal humans win against chaos). I was just hoping for something different then the usual late game monster mash. But don't get me wrong i enjoy many of Duke's design decisions for his overhaul, like the armor rework, ranged troops and especially the way lords fight now.
It seemed to me like the big deciding factor in this one was the synergy between the factions on the destruction side. The Skaven and Beastmen had infantry that the order factions just couldn't grind through quick enough, and the Vampire Coast and Skaven had units that ran really good interference on the Dwarfen ranged elements. If the order group had stuck closer together and better supported the Dwarfs, I think this battle would have turned out differently, but as it stood there were just too many things that the Dwarfs couldn't deal with because they were constantly getting railed by wolf rats and Vampire Coast artillery.
Everyone on the destruction side seemed to know exactly what their purpose was and stuck to it while the order faction didn't effectively protect the elements of their army that could deal with the most dangerous parts of the enemy.
You are gonna make me redownload Call of Warhammer with those good ole memories you keep coming back to lol.
Love the subcommanders style videos.
These are so awesome please keep them coming!
Indy, loving the modded games, LOVING the subcommanders, keep it coming my guy!
The replays put the action on the spotlight really nicely.
Loving all the subcommanders videoes you're putting up. Tides me over until CA finish getting the game into perfect working order.
Love the Dukes Damned Nations overhaul!
What a battle, so much going on at all times!
These subcommander battles are awesome. Would love to participate sometime
I swear the Dogs of War are the most unlucky contender on this channel second only to the chaos dragon
Remastered medieval 2 third age and CoW would be epic. I'd like that more than regular total war warhammer
Those are some truly epic battles rather than just some 1500 gold chav and a halfways decent lord because you can't pay for more in a 1v1 land battle. I love seeing those, very very well done
Sub-commander is amazing
LOOK AT ALL THOSE GUYS!!!
Good stuff
I like Kruber as the thumbnail
I maybe one of the few but if there is a way to incorporate a setup phase/ review of the terrain i would enjoy that look before the battle. Im liking the way it is now too! Great use of replays on the big booms!
Rat Ogres= 5'10
Bone Breakers= 6ft
Hell yeah a 4v4
These games seem to boil down to whether order can shut down destruction's zany artillery or not.
Love me some Queen Mama Bess action
I know it says Pyrrhic victory but that was entirely a one-sided match-up considering those monsters were running around with 75%+ HP despite being in combat right from the get-go. Mods got some balancing issues It looked like.
a lot of the monsters for Moulder and the Ghorgon have regen, so naturally in a spread out battlefield with ebbs and flows they will have time to heal HP back. Gotta work with your team to take them off the map, which can be more difficult than in 1v1s
Maybe you could the "less bloom and blur mod" or even the better "lighting overhaul" mod?
Makes the battles easier on the eyes.
I use Ultimate lighting overhaul sometimes. it doesn't always make the map look better though, so in the cases that it doesn't I skip it. but yeah the shiny bloom on armor and stuff is sometimes a bit much in wh3
man. call me bias but always rubs me wrong seeing sartosa being portrayed alongside evil factions. sure aranessa was.. shall we say "stubborn" with the end times, but she aint "evil". just a pirate who hates norscans
i mean she was "friendly" acquaintances with Roth and even joined him against the dreadfleet!
and yes in this game she's a lord for a mostly undead faction of vampires and zombies. but not all vampires are evil, and shes still mortal,
i just wanna see her team up with order factions for a change
or at least use nanu's mod for a moree human sartosa with roth.
Man i keep missing stuff
6:30 How did those Firedrakes get so huge?
They're rune-golems not infantry
Did feel slightly one sided! Those ratties just tore up the battle lines
Really tough ask of our opponents in this one - southern realms troops in the submod are skilled and I would say as powerful as other factions overall - but they're one of the hardest to play due to mercenaries and militias both being generally quite low morale so when things go wrong, it's easy for them to keep going wrong
13:02
Are ghorgons smaller in this mod or are those rat ogres just frickin' huge?
Both
Any more sub commanders coming?
Yeeeboii
I can fix her.
UA-cam Algorithm
Doesn't seem like a balanced map, ngl. Granted, I don't know where exactly the deployment zones are, but with Vampirates starting off on the high ground like that whilst also having some protection from the forest, Queen Bess letting them pressure the Order faction into charging forward, right into the shadewraiths... I don't see how the Southern realms coulda won that one, even if their units were much better than they appear to be.
Are these actually fun to fight or terribly laggy?
i have certainly played very laggy big team battles. but no generally when you set these up you get people with good computers and connections, and it can run pretty smooth and be fun to play
The are no skaven
Thr Duke has some fun ideas, but he seems to be trying to make TWWIII into a game it fundamentally isn't with his changes. I think his mod would shine if the new engine had the moddability of the old engine from Medieval II, but as it stands every time I see a Duke's Damned Nations match it just seems so janky it detracts from the experience.
anything specific that stood out to you?
@@milkandcookiesTW Hey Indie! From my limited experience with the mod and the videos on the channel, the two biggest things are how absolutely vulnerable non-monster lords are to being targeted into irrelevance, and how the changes to health make monstruous infantry even stronger than before.
The other thing that I freely admit might just be my bias is that battles seem to be decided far faster. Usually in Subcommanders I get gripped into seeing who would win and who would lose, sometimes until the last second, but in this one it seemed like it was a foregone conclusion. Maybe that's just a consequence of Southern Realms not playing well with Damned Nations, I don't know.
Regardless of all of that, it was still an enjoyable match, with amazing commentary as usual! Thanks for taking the time to listen and reply (even to a schmuck like me who might be wrong at everything he's saying).
Happy for people to have their own takes, but it's worth mentioning that battles are actually on average quite a bit slower, this was just a fast one. I'd also mention that med2 being more moddable isn't really true despite the reputation. Having modded both, and half the games in between, wh3 is up there as one of the most moddable, the contender being 3K which has much more moddable ai but also has more compatability issues
@@theduketw Thanks for dispersing the myth of Medieval II being more moddable. As I don't have experience with mods, I was speaking from my own experience, which I understand is limited being merely a consumer.
As far as your battles being a bit slower, that wasn't really my experience with your mod. Maybe I didn't give it enough of a chance, but me and my friends stopped playing it because we thought the battle "win-cons" were far faster to achieve than with vanilla or other overhauls. While it's true the battle itself is slower, I kept feeling it was over midway through, and was consistently correct on that regard. Maybe things changed since I've last tried it, however.
@@mariojorge68 a lot of the win cons can be overcome with things like fatigue control. If you can tire out something powerful with something cheap, something else cheap can often punch well above its weight and cause proper issues for the typical win con units
First