Man nobody has explained this so simply and clearly even though I have watched so many videos! Thank you so much. And yes nifty fifty is a winner for me.
If you are talking about lenses you have to specify the camera or at least the sensor. "50mm" means nothing if we dont know the sensor size. I assume full frame I guess?
@@AtomLabX not necessarily. Wide angle doesn't always = bokeh. There's the ratio of distance between camera-to-subject and subject-to-background as well as how wide the aperture is. I have a 7.5mm on a MFT sensor (so 11-12m APS-C / 15mm Full Frame) - at f2.0 it gets some half-decent bokeh but stop it down and zilch bokeh. Meanwhile the 23mm MFT f/1.4 has heaps of bokeh (again, depending on that distance ratio). And the 17mm MFT f/0.95 is just monstrous bokeh 😁 On the beach with the Canon 75-300mm APS-C I used to get gorgeously creamy bokeh but that's because I was a good 40 metres away from the subject and the background (cliffs) were about 500 metres away from the subject! I just wish I had a room that big for my own youtube videos 🤣🤣🤣
I think he must be talking about full frame. With my APS-C camera 16 mm is about right to use as a webcam for presentations. I have 32 mm lens as well but it is way too zoomed in unless I set the camera way back.
Nice video - thanks for taking the time to show the comparisons. It would be great to know the distance between camera-to-subject to help understand what fits within the frame from what distance. For example I recently did some headshots with a 135mm f/2.8 on a MFT (so 270mm f/5.6 Full Frame equivalent) and the camera was a good 8-10 metres away ... the compression was great but slightly out of arms reach and not at all practical for UA-cam (especially being a manual lens - although these challenges can be easily overcome with the assistance of a 15 year old son or, if you can't wait that long, PDMovie remote focus and BenBox wireless video streaming)!!
I prefer the 85mm with talking heads, just because it makes the face look better. Yet, the camera has to be so far away and all that, but it is worth it, for the way you look on camera. and 16 is the worst. As AX3 said, it would be nice to say that hey, we are talking full frame here, so new people at least would know what is going on. Because this is more advanced, if you're going this way.
Gotta be a little better about matching your size in the different shots so we can see the difference. Your last one you look more zoomed out, which hides the extra background compression that actually exists.
Thank you, this helped considerably. I am getting into shooting interviews on a crop sensor and it looks like a 35mm lens will work to get close to a 50mm look.
I have a question. I'm wanting to start a video podcast with a 4 camera set up. I have 4 cannon 80Ds and I would like to have 3 cameras focused on the individual talent and the 4th camera on everyone at once, what lens would you suggest?
I am completley new to this. My camera is an APS-C (Canon M6 ii), so I need to multiply by 1.6 to convert to the sizes you are talking about. So my 16 mm lens is equivalent to a 26 mm lens. Is that right?
Hi Stephen. You probably have your answer by now. But you're right. You also have to multiply the f-stop number to get the equivalent aperture, as both focal length and aperture are affected on crop sensors.
The 85mm doesn't look weird to me at all. It actually looks pretty good and similar to the 50mm.
Man nobody has explained this so simply and clearly even though I have watched so many videos! Thank you so much. And yes nifty fifty is a winner for me.
If you are talking about lenses you have to specify the camera or at least the sensor. "50mm" means nothing if we dont know the sensor size. I assume full frame I guess?
I'm sure it is full lens.
Others we would have gotten some Bokeh with the 16mm, if it was native APS-C lens.
@@AtomLabX not necessarily. Wide angle doesn't always = bokeh. There's the ratio of distance between camera-to-subject and subject-to-background as well as how wide the aperture is. I have a 7.5mm on a MFT sensor (so 11-12m APS-C / 15mm Full Frame) - at f2.0 it gets some half-decent bokeh but stop it down and zilch bokeh. Meanwhile the 23mm MFT f/1.4 has heaps of bokeh (again, depending on that distance ratio). And the 17mm MFT f/0.95 is just monstrous bokeh 😁
On the beach with the Canon 75-300mm APS-C I used to get gorgeously creamy bokeh but that's because I was a good 40 metres away from the subject and the background (cliffs) were about 500 metres away from the subject! I just wish I had a room that big for my own youtube videos 🤣🤣🤣
I think he must be talking about full frame. With my APS-C camera 16 mm is about right to use as a webcam for presentations. I have 32 mm lens as well but it is way too zoomed in unless I set the camera way back.
Missed the key info of what camera you're shooting this on. Is it FF, S35, Apsc, or Mft? So many you tubers leave out this critical information.
Agreed
Nice video - thanks for taking the time to show the comparisons.
It would be great to know the distance between camera-to-subject to help understand what fits within the frame from what distance. For example I recently did some headshots with a 135mm f/2.8 on a MFT (so 270mm f/5.6 Full Frame equivalent) and the camera was a good 8-10 metres away ... the compression was great but slightly out of arms reach and not at all practical for UA-cam (especially being a manual lens - although these challenges can be easily overcome with the assistance of a 15 year old son or, if you can't wait that long, PDMovie remote focus and BenBox wireless video streaming)!!
Can you elaborate on 35 vs 50mm for talk to camera setup?
I prefer the 85mm with talking heads, just because it makes the face look better.
Yet, the camera has to be so far away and all that, but it is worth it, for the way you look on camera.
and 16 is the worst.
As AX3 said, it would be nice to say that hey, we are talking full frame here, so new people at least would know what is going on.
Because this is more advanced, if you're going this way.
Ah
Thank you
Full frame or APS-C??? This would make a difference don't ya think?
May we have the sensor size for this video illustration?
Thanks 🙏🏿
That 85 looks good
You really need to cite the sensor size otherwise the focal length is meaningless.
Are you using an APS-C camera or a full frame camera in this video?
i saw so many videos today but this is the most beautifully explaind video i have come across 😇 thankyou for clearing all the doubts
Gotta be a little better about matching your size in the different shots so we can see the difference. Your last one you look more zoomed out, which hides the extra background compression that actually exists.
I love my Konica Hexanon 55mm f16 on my EOS R8
Are the focal lentgh for full frame or cropped (AKA do I have to converted them to full frame or vise versa) ?
Got 35, will complement with 50 and 85 - that will be a perfect fit
Great insights!
Please, how far did you have to stand from the 50mm?
What camera would be helpful
What’s the link to the other Premium Beat video about focal lengths that you spoke of during this video? Thanks!
was the 50mm a f/1.8 or f/1.4 ? or another one ?
Thank you, this helped considerably. I am getting into shooting interviews on a crop sensor and it looks like a 35mm lens will work to get close to a 50mm look.
Nice video but forgot to mention APS-C vs fullframe on the intro. Not all focal lengths are equal on aps-c and fullframe
Much needed video!!!!!! Thank you!!!!!
What camera did you use to shoot from 6:00 to 6:05 ? In case you remember, then please mention the lights used as well.
can you share which camera you are shooting on ?
35mm owith my 18-35mm sigma for canon on a 250D is working well for me
Very good points and comparison footage! Thanks! I prefer the 35mm :)
Great video!!!🎉
I have a question. I'm wanting to start a video podcast with a 4 camera set up. I have 4 cannon 80Ds and I would like to have 3 cameras focused on the individual talent and the 4th camera on everyone at once, what lens would you suggest?
Well explained . Simple .
I am completley new to this. My camera is an APS-C (Canon M6 ii), so I need to multiply by 1.6 to convert to the sizes you are talking about. So my 16 mm lens is equivalent to a 26 mm lens. Is that right?
Hi Stephen. You probably have your answer by now. But you're right. You also have to multiply the f-stop number to get the equivalent aperture, as both focal length and aperture are affected on crop sensors.
It's a shame you don't know what you are talking abou.