@@karliann1 and many more! I’m a grandmother and I would never even have that thought cross my mind!! They certainly don’t think about the long run…IF they get caught, even they won’t get the child(ren) & you won’t have your freedom nor able to see the child(ren)! Not only that…you basically made your children/grandchildren orphans!! Was it worth it?! 🙄 and notice they do right in the middle of custody cases…🙄 nothing like making you suspect #1 🙄
@@MrsRobinson0741 Agree I have custody of my grandbaby for 2 years and finally my daughter gets every other weekend unsupervised and her dad separately gets the other weekends. As much as I love this baby she needs her parents and I need some freedom sometimes but for a whole year I had the baby All the time no breaks at all
Wow!!! This was a shocking verdict!!! I was so sure the jury would find her not guilty, due to her age and church lady appearance; proves that some juries can look past a lot of things and sentence on strictly facts and evidence!! Gave me a little hope; prayers for his family R.I.P. Ron 🤲🏽🙏🏽
So true! They're cowards and hire others to do their dirty work. They think that they covered their tracks, when 99% of the time, they're dumber than a box of rocks. They incriminate themselves, they're sloppy / leave evidence behind or they talk too much.
I worked with Ann Trexler when she lived in Richmond Va. I considered her kind of a friend but when I heard that she had done this I was blown away. Just sickening!!
Genuinely think this was more Kim coaxing Ann. Like Kim wanted it done and saw the opportunity to manipulate Ann, maybe using ( not confirmed) abuse of Kirsten to play on emotions. Because Tina’s presence is not known on any of this, even her alibi was solid. So strange, maybe Tina genuinely had problems and wasn’t going to contest Ron taking Kirsten out of state. Sounds like Kim was mad that Ron was leaving out of state. So strange, especially if affairs and drugs are in the mix. I’m definitely going to research this case. Sad all round though. RIP Ron 🙁
Amazing how co-dependants turn on each other. Her attorney switched up and blamed the hairstylist for having a motive and everything to do with the murder.
Isn't it funny. How if she had a gun. When he was shooting through the door. She would've shot through the door. Man he would have been surprised. Why I own guns. William s
Didn't the prosecution ask for proof of the 10000 being spent? Guessing they did. Leaving that out of show made it look closer than it was. Kim came forward even if she is also pretty bad.
The prosecutor seemed to somewhat exagerate how "unbelievable" Ann presented herself on the stand. For instance, such as when he personally imitated a sentence spoken by her. When she hsd originally presented this sentence aloud, it sounded like she was either mostly to entirely only inadvertently "exhaling" her words so to speak. She might have slightly dragged such spoken words out, but this small stall was seemingly certainly more noteworthy than any actual overboard "exhaling" of her words that is... or at least from what I could hear anyways.... By contrast though, granted... one can't lift their knee up (from the standing position) without also moving their leg forward too, but the defendant at most, perhaps let her foot dangle for a little while longer than what could be expected. Her recollection of phone calls maybe wasn't the best (times, dates and perhaps conversational topics...), but good question how easy such a series of verbal correspondence would've actually been to recollect, given that only a modest amount of conclusive details were presented in the above documentary.... However, Ann seemingly remained something of generally calm during such questioning. And it secondly seemed that the defense could've even had all the elements they needed to raise reasonable doubt. That said,, Kim also used to have some relations of some sort with Ron (as best recalled) and Antonio even appeared to reaffirm the defendant's claims to innocence... giving the jury two opinions on the stand versus one. Although there's perhaps maybe even a considerable chance that hitmen (or women) could find it unethical to give away the people at the top of the murder plots of whom were responsible for monetary payments... that's ultimately still speculation. Heck (Antonio maybe even had ties with a gang or mob affiliation as best recalled), maybe it's even a gang or mob-associated custom (for all I know) not to inform police of the people at the top of such murder plots, but Antonio didn't seem hesitant to mention Kim as a liar and even sounded something of convincing... or at least first-handedly anyways. It didn't seem necesarily easy to get the impression of him lying about this matter or at least from the clips shown above that is.
Who tells their hairdresser that they are going to withdraw ex amount of money on a certain day if it’s for a lawyer. You might say I need to pay about £10 000 but you wouldn’t say how much and on what day. And did they find this supposed lawyer that they gave the money to?
Watch #CourtTV Accomplice to Murder with #VinniePolitan Sundays 8 PM/7 CT
MORE HERE: www.courttv.com/trials/accomplice-to-murder-with-vinnie-politan/?
Guys, why should Perez lie about Grandmother's involvement???
If you really love your grandkid, you wouldn't murder their parent!
Donna Adelson needed to hear that, too. But Florida.
what an intro❤ i am obsessed with these episodes,who better than vinnie?🥳
I love how these shows start as well! It's so innovative!
I like the stories not the cartoons.. use real pics of the people
Its amazing how many people still claim someone has to be innocent bc they dont have a prior record. Geez
There’s a first time for everything
Love this program, Vinnie! More please! 😍
Another grandmother like Adelson
Exactly
I came to the comments to say the same thing
Thank you, Vinnie! I love this! Keep up your great work 💜🎶💜
Woh woh hold on a minute. Who’s the Hollywood detective?
The term is " whoa".
Why do you want to be a detective when you could be in movies. He is a gorgeous man.
@brendamcdonall5798
Karen, miles to go before you replace Strunk & White. Besides, we knew what he meant.
He is sexy
Sounds like Donna Adelson
And the Pike county Rhoden family!!
And the Oklahoma people
@@karliann1 and many more! I’m a grandmother and I would never even have that thought cross my mind!! They certainly don’t think about the long run…IF they get caught, even they won’t get the child(ren) & you won’t have your freedom nor able to see the child(ren)! Not only that…you basically made your children/grandchildren orphans!! Was it worth it?! 🙄 and notice they do right in the middle of custody cases…🙄 nothing like making you suspect #1 🙄
@@MrsRobinson0741 Agree I have custody of my grandbaby for 2 years and finally my daughter gets every other weekend unsupervised and her dad separately gets the other weekends. As much as I love this baby she needs her parents and I need some freedom sometimes but for a whole year I had the baby All the time no breaks at all
An excellent episode….On location!??..you guys are spoiling us! ❤️
❤️
Wow!!! This was a shocking verdict!!! I was so sure the jury would find her not guilty, due to her age and church lady appearance; proves that some juries can look past a lot of things and sentence on strictly facts and evidence!! Gave me a little hope; prayers for his family R.I.P. Ron 🤲🏽🙏🏽
She looked sinister to me. And like an older version of Kim Miller, who set up the crime.
Read in peace, Ron ✨️
Love your documentaries Vinnie! Well done.
Kim Miller is PURE street.
Funny how she forgot all about those phonecalls.......
especially times calls placed
Worst haircut I've ever seen on a hairdresser.
It amazes me how many people get others to do their dirty work.
So true! They're cowards and hire others to do their dirty work.
They think that they covered their tracks, when 99% of the time, they're dumber than a box of rocks.
They incriminate themselves, they're sloppy / leave evidence behind or they talk too much.
Like Trump
@@nancychandler3673 yep
Like real bad? Like dead?
Great show I love everyone of
Them
Hmmm..another Charlie Adelson case of sorts
I worked with Ann Trexler when she lived in Richmond Va. I considered her kind of a friend but when I heard that she had done this I was blown away. Just sickening!!
Nice timing for here in bonnie Scotland 🏴🏴🏴
I'm in London UK 🇬🇧
I'm here in South Carolina 🇺🇸
Genuinely think this was more Kim coaxing Ann. Like Kim wanted it done and saw the opportunity to manipulate Ann, maybe using ( not confirmed) abuse of Kirsten to play on emotions. Because Tina’s presence is not known on any of this, even her alibi was solid. So strange, maybe Tina genuinely had problems and wasn’t going to contest Ron taking Kirsten out of state. Sounds like Kim was mad that Ron was leaving out of state. So strange, especially if affairs and drugs are in the mix. I’m definitely going to research this case. Sad all round though. RIP Ron 🙁
This case is so heartbreaking.
Ron's widow's name is pronounced with the j sound (Angeleka) . It's usually spelled like this : Angelica .
Lol she’s trying so hard to make herself cry yet not a single tear on her face
where do I get a courtv shirt and hat COME ON
Amazing how co-dependants turn on each other. Her attorney switched up and blamed the hairstylist for having a motive and everything to do with the murder.
Include me too. Love this
This case was on an episode of On the case with Paula Zahn
Great case, story well told.
The girl up there something wrong. He was laying on the ground like a baby. That is sick... What a depiction
Isn't it funny. How if she had a gun. When he was shooting through the door. She would've shot through the door. Man he would have been surprised. Why I own guns. William s
Fear breeds fear. I understand protecting yourself is important but we also can’t blame her for not having a gun, it’s a hard one to digest I suppose.
So his x and her mom That’s not real complicated
Honestly am a bit taken aback with the verdict
They didn't have cell phones back then
Didn't the prosecution ask for proof of the 10000 being spent? Guessing they did. Leaving that out of show made it look closer than it was. Kim came forward even if she is also pretty bad.
Why no reporting on REBECCA GRossman ?!?!
Yeah I really hope she gets jail time. Not a slap on the wrist.
the blondie is cute af
Why don't adults know the difference in ground and floor?
Where did his daughter go? To the mom who's mother killed him? If so, I'd say she got what she wanted. Not fair.
Use to go to pcb many yrs
Ummmm she doesn't look like a church lady to me! My Grammy is a true church lady❤
Awesome love your blogs Susan in Jhb. SOUTH 🇿🇦
Monster in law
About time !
Yo Kim Miller scares me 😳
Vinnie💗
The prosecutor seemed to somewhat exagerate how "unbelievable" Ann presented herself on the stand. For instance, such as when he personally imitated a sentence spoken by her. When she hsd originally presented this sentence aloud, it sounded like she was either mostly to entirely only inadvertently "exhaling" her words so to speak. She might have slightly dragged such spoken words out, but this small stall was seemingly certainly more noteworthy than any actual overboard "exhaling" of her words that is... or at least from what I could hear anyways.... By contrast though, granted... one can't lift their knee up (from the standing position) without also moving their leg forward too, but the defendant at most, perhaps let her foot dangle for a little while longer than what could be expected. Her recollection of phone calls maybe wasn't the best (times, dates and perhaps conversational topics...), but good question how easy such a series of verbal correspondence would've actually been to recollect, given that only a modest amount of conclusive details were presented in the above documentary.... However, Ann seemingly remained something of generally calm during such questioning. And it secondly seemed that the defense could've even had all the elements they needed to raise reasonable doubt. That said,, Kim also used to have some relations of some sort with Ron (as best recalled) and Antonio even appeared to reaffirm the defendant's claims to innocence... giving the jury two opinions on the stand versus one. Although there's perhaps maybe even a considerable chance that hitmen (or women) could find it unethical to give away the people at the top of the murder plots of whom were responsible for monetary payments... that's ultimately still speculation. Heck (Antonio maybe even had ties with a gang or mob affiliation as best recalled), maybe it's even a gang or mob-associated custom (for all I know) not to inform police of the people at the top of such murder plots, but Antonio didn't seem hesitant to mention Kim as a liar and even sounded something of convincing... or at least first-handedly anyways. It didn't seem necesarily easy to get the impression of him lying about this matter or at least from the clips shown above that is.
Robert Bonk....AMAZINGGGGGGGG🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
I think the phone calls did her in and Kim not my friend haha Kim pure street
Awful grandma. 😵💫
so murders usually don't have hairstyles and nice outfits? silly commment
Vinne doing /////////////////////// Too Much.....
Who tells their hairdresser that they are going to withdraw ex amount of money on a certain day if it’s for a lawyer. You might say I need to pay about £10 000 but you wouldn’t say how much and on what day. And did they find this supposed lawyer that they gave the money to?
Vinnie, please work on correctly pronouncing names. Thank you.
Oh, what a stupid story
So this is the og adelson basically.
Vinnie,
Why such an old case???
stop taking a mothers child, it's not a gold fish, it brings out the momma bear in a women
What about a poppa bear?
I’m not a fan of the cartoons
Somebody tell me how "CourtTV" doesn't cover a President go to court????
it's not MURDER. Why would they
@@SHARON.I Dude come on. It's the president. Every American should be able to watch the trial! Don't you think it's weird we didn't get to watch?
It was highly restricted trial. With the secret service, and all the other complications I don't believe they were allowed.
There are no cameras
What are they going to cover!
Come on now.
@@sherrisRN Vinny & every other Pundit on CourtTV talk about cases 98% of the time the other 2% is footage. What are you talking about?
Why are you using the awful AI illustrations? They are so ugly.
This case was on an episode of On the case with Paula Zahn