Roman Empire - Trajan invades Dacia

I created this video with the UA-cam Video Editor ( / editor )

[@TrajanAugustus]

That is true. I conquered part of Dacia, not all of it as "historians" such as Terry Jones would say.

[@pagancenturion94]

Trajan Augustus As u say Lord :)

[@cassiusquintilianustiberiu6889]

THANK YOU TRAJAN!

[@giuvannicammora2821]

My ancestor ha ha

[@romulusbuta9318]

@@pagancenturion94 da-l in plm și pe Traian... că a venit aici la jaf și crimă...nu să facă orașe civilizate și viață economică prospera.......Astea au fost o vreme, ca o consecință......dar NU pt așa ceva a venit el în Dacia !!!!! JAF ȘI CRIMĂ ,JAF ȘI CRIMĂ

[@sergekrieger3145]

Both Trajan and Deceballus were charismatic leaders, but Trajan was more than Decebalus could swallow. Hence his head on pike.

[@ash8207]

Serge Krieger That may be true but in the end the Free Dacians, thanks to their Sarmatian/Germanic allies (especially the Goths) were able to force the Romans out of Dacia in 275 after a long & brutal insurgency.
Speaking of Traian, Parthia was more then he could swallow when he got his ass kicked there & had no choice but to abandon his overzealous ambitions of further conquest.

[@histguy101]

@@ash8207 Trajan won a full victory in Parthia and annexed the Territory as a new province.
Where did you hear otherwise?
His successor Hadrian thought the conquest was foolish, and the huge territory undefendable, so he abandoned much of the new province. They certainly didn't abandon Armenia, Mesopotamia, or Arabia though. These were the frontier for centuries.

[@ash8207]

@@histguy101 You make some good points but you're also omitting the not so favorable conclusion of Trajan's campaign in Parthia. Yes it was initially a success but a failure in the end. The Parthians' insurgency eventually forced the Romans out & exposed the unsustainable policy of Trajan's ambitions that exposed Rome's inability to maintain or expand their empire after Trajan died of illness. The historical sources show that clearly..."Aware that the Parthian campaign was an enormous setback, and that it revealed that the Roman Empire had no means for an ambitious program of conquests, Hadrian's first act as emperor was to abandon - outwardly out of his own free will - the distant and indefensible Mesopotamia and to restore Armenia, as well as Osrhoene, to the Parthian hegemony under Roman suzerainty." Not exactly a glorious or successful end to the Parthian saga. Also if you skip to minute 39 of this historical documentary, it's obvious that Trajan's ambitious campaign of conquest & expansion was only a temporary sucess but ultimately an ignoble failure, which even his successor Hadrian immediately recognized...ua-cam.com/video/wZt7Wz43_OM/v-deo.html

[@MrTNA-ml8tt]

Trajan had many more resourses than Decebal. It is not like they gone head to head with the same cause it might have been a different outcome

[@histguy101]

That first quote about training all the time, bloodless battle & bloody exercise was Josephus. I got excited when I recognized it!

[@loszhor]

FINALLY! A version of this episode that isn't drowned out by the background music! Thanks for uploading!

[@almighty5839]

What series is this

[@almighty5839]

What series is this

[@loszhor]

@@almighty5839 It's called "Ancient Warriors".

[@almighty5839]

@@loszhor thank you

[@loszhor]

@@almighty5839 NP.

[@38starman]

Yes, I agree with you, I didn't make this video, I only edited it, Historical accuracy is rarely portrayed in movies and even so called factual documentaries, are not often accurate. There is often much propaganda. Thank you for watching and for your comments. :)

[@andreivlad3518]

and this is the beginning of the formation of the Romanian nation! 😁🥳

[@Zion1Defined]

Do Romanians trace their ancestry to Dacians?

[@andreivlad3518]

@@Zion1Defined Romanian culture is very old, some elements are millennial. The arrival of the Romans changed the language and administration or mixed with the Dacians and improved the culture. some elements of our millennial culture.
ua-cam.com/video/CvlkTt0r7TM/v-deo.html

[@corneliuscornia4436]

@@Zion1Defined Some yes ,some maybe not and this is the case to all nations ,England is not 100%all from Anglo Saxons,they also a mix of others.

[@Zion1Defined]

@@corneliuscornia4436 I completely agree, well said!

[@romulusbuta9318]

@Costea Bogdan ce-ți mai place DACOPATIA ,chear dacă știi că e o bolală ! 🥴🥴🥴🤯🔨

[@Geckobane]

This music is going to make me pleasantly hallucinate

[@ionutioan2118]

Why not a documentary with Burebista?romans lost 2 big wars against dacians so it s fair to show also when they lose

[@histguy101]

There are several documentaries detailing the Dacian wars under Domitian.

[@sheruffa6032]

Hai ragione! :)

[@andreivlad3518]

Romans lost wars and pay tribute to Dacians!😒

[@martiawesome]

@@andreivlad3518 they didnt lose.domitian wanted to end the war early since he was dealing with a rebellion

[@andreivlad3518]

@@martiawesome it is about Burebista, not about Decebalus. Burebista's political opponent was Caesar. Burebista united all the Dacian tribes and formed Dacia as a state.

[@spykethegentle579]

As an historian passionate it is very strange in all history books documentaries and universities to find writings and so many records only about the Roman achievements, life stile, military power etc and how much they conquered. Now after so many years and not based on books I learned that Romans were very good at destroying evidence and specially of people that were above them or had an advanced culture and if that is the case why out of all people conquered by them they become so abscessed with Dacians? You find today more statues of Dacians than Roman Emperors, why Trajan dedicated 7 years of his life to build the column and detailed their accomplishment and if those Dacian barbarians were so insignificant why display to the world some tribes which are no better than other tribes? Why bring to Rome Dacian clothing and vestments embroidered with traditional Dacian motives which you still see today in Northern Italy, hand made jewelry and necklace exposed in Italian musemus and other parts of the world. The Russians still keeps a huge Dacian treasure created before Rome even existed. After Decebalus was gone why the Romans did not conquered the rest of Thracia which 90% of Daco-Getae groups were still intact. Why Trajan refused to go back and choose other expedition where he got sick and died. Why later on when the Roman Empire was conquered by the Gots which a lot of people claimed to be Germanic tribes does not mention the reality that these Gots were comming from Apuseni mountains in Dacia and in fact where Getae tribes called Gots by the Celts which they had a love hate relationship? We can deny a lot of facts and history books but the old Dacian settlements their 7000 years old cooper mines, the 6000 old salt mines, their 8000 old Thracian culture that spread all over the world it is still there in Romania of today which according to the latest findings shows that most likely they were the first Europeans with the most advanced culture and regardless how much we want to debate, lie or falsify the history the evidence is staring at us.

[@florinpanuta2721]

Esti un roman ft bine documentat.

[@Alex-hz2xg]

Very true. Did a lot of research on the Dacians too. Also see the connections between the Daci and the Dahae (tribe east of the Caspian sea and called "Dasa" in Sanskrit, meaning "servants of God"), and the Getae with the Massagetae (also tribe east of the Caspian sea, massagetae meaning "great/big getae"). I believe that the Migration Period of the 4th century was the Massagetae, the Dahae and Goth tribes coming to help the Dacians against the Romans (they're the same people), because it was only after Dacia was annexed that all these tribes came to Europe. The Goths, which the historian Jordanes claimed to be Getae people lived in Denmark. In Latin the Danish people were actually called "Dacos". Also, the Roman people themselves were Thracians/Dacians, it is widely accepted that the Indo Europeans came from the north of the Black Sea (nowadays Moldova/Ukraine).

[@cristinamirelasoare2969]

History belong to the winners. That's the only truth in history.

[@raulbogdan100]

Bullshit.We know the Goths were Germanic.They migrated from Gotland in Sweden and we know what language they spoke, and the language was germanic lol.Thracian culture that spread all over the world?!That is even more bullshit.Where did it spread?Other cultures were kinda similar because they were Indo European but it does not mean that they started from the Thracians.Plus, 8000 years ago there was no such thing as Thracians or Dacians.Europe was populated by hunter gatherers and than the Neolithic farmers from Anatolia appeard ans started to have settlements in the Balkans.

[@Grey-ub5ds]

@@raulbogdan100 well there you Don t understand anything beacus the dacians are in fact the first man s to go to Northen America the gots are from the same tribe who Come to Europe in fact even now you can see germanic words are very similar to some roumainian word's but in fact is that the dacia was the best in culture medicine agriculture and many more but even with the facts in your face you still can't admit it cowerd(and if you are from Italy is preferabil to say that your nation is more tracic than Latin because the dacic and Romans were brothers tribe

[@laviniabublywater6924]

Dacians only defended themselves.Romans ,as usualy ,only came for gold.

[@mesharix1254]

Ave Caesar!

[@cdjmk1000]

fuck him and fuck u , u pussies

[@nothingtoospiffy7913]

@@cdjmk1000 fuck off little bitch

[@costine1]

20 percent of Dacia, the capital Sarmisegetuza and gold mines area. They found the Dacia tresaury

[@mitzucelrau]

40% din Dacia velicodacus.blogspot.de/2014/01/problema-spatiului-ocupat-de-romani-in.html
Oricum, restul de 60% nu era in totalitate ocupat de daci, ca au aparut si alte populatii in zona.

[@almighty5839]

This is one of the calmest and coolest documentaries I’ve ever seen. Is this a series that I can watch the rest of or is it just a one time documentary

[@j-rocgood7680]

I believe this was from a series called Ancient Warriors, there are many episodes about different warrior cultures throughout history. As far as I know this was the only episode related to Rome or Dacia though.

[@almighty5839]

@@j-rocgood7680ahh ok thank you

[@danieljurca2113]

The research continues...

[@abrahamfroman246]

One of the shortest books ever written is “Italian War Heroes”, essentially a pamphlet.

[@abrahamfroman246]

jimi1234567 The Jews have done pretty well recently; in the Six Day War and the Yom Kippur War. As well as the Raid on Entebbe and tracking down those responsible for the Munich Massacre. Meanwhile the Italians put on brown shirts and later, essentially let the red brigades operate with impunity.

[@carlomagno7092]

Italy won more wars than the US ;)

[@abrahamfroman246]

@@carlomagno7092 Meh ... I guess that measured over 2500+ years vs less than 250 years your statement may be accurate, but not relevant. In Afghanistan, NATO soldiers wore an "ISAF" patch ... it stood for "Italians Suck At Fighting"

[@davidmark225]

@@carlomagno7092 As if romans were italians lol

[@felicecentofanti5084]

trajan first foreign roman emperor and one of the greatest. thank you

[@saitdizdarevic3538]

Nobody and everybody in roman empire was foreign
Do some research

[@TheTrajanator]

You cannot really say "foreign". His ancestors were propably Roman colonists, who settled in Southern Spain after expulsion of the Carthaginians at the end of the 3rd century BCE. When Trajan was born, his father was already a patrician and member of the Senate thus making Rome as Trajan's actual birthplace rather than Italica.

[@dwizzleusa4202]

Trajans descendents were roman

[@razvan1282]

They never conquered Dacia. Just a quarter of it. And Traian s mother was from Dacia. When he came to Dacia, he said welcome home. So, Latin languages come from Dacia not the other way around.

[@annadrew4]

Dovadă?

[@vladtheimpaler5364]

Asta e doar o teorie, dar cine stie

[@raduciocan3619]

Ce fumezi vere

[@danicornea]

Very proud of my dacian origin....

[@corneliuscornia4436]

La fel si aici.😀👍💪

[@gvisylva]

Barbarus !!!!!!

[@raduciocan3619]

Civis romanus sum

[@raduciocan3619]

Poate turc ca dać nu

[@georgeparvu7068]

In latin language Barba means beard..and because they the romans used to shave their faces ,the people that wares a hair beard was called barbarians ....that is from were the word Barbarians name comes from...!!!

[@histguy101]

I'm sorry, but that's not true. The word Barbarian comes from the Greek Barbaros, and it referred to anyone who didn't speak Greek. The Romans adopted the same word and used it more or less the same, or different ways in different contexts. Barbarians could be non Greek or Latin speakers, or they could be provincials, or noncitizen provincials, and definitely anyone outside the borders.
Also, the Romans were not all clean shaven. In fact, every emperor between Trajan and Constantine kept a nice thick beard(like Antoninus Pius, Hadrian, Marcus Aurelius, Lucius Verus, Commodus, Septimius Severus, Caracalla, Phillip, Decius, Aurelian, Diocletian, Maximian, Galerius, et al wore beautiful burly beards).

[@peter-df6wl]

@costeabogdan505 The name "Hyborian" is a contraction of the Greek concept of the land of "Hyperborea", literally "Beyond the North Wind". This was a mythical place far to the north that was not cold and where things did not age.🤣🤭 You fool

[@peter-df6wl]

@costeabogdan505 When you off the drug we can talk Zalmoxis !Romanians are Pelasgo-Thracian-Geto-Dacians (Hyperboreans / Latins)🤔
In 1859, Wallachia united with Moldavia to form the United Principalities, which adopted the name Romania in 1866 .

[@peter-df6wl]

@costeabogdan505 Imaginary actualization of the past wont make you becomes Dacian.
The truth is: Romania was founded in 1859
Ceaușescu's nationalist principles.
Notably, it demanded that Romanian historians refer to Dacians.
Daniel Roxin
The Dacians Romania's ancestors.
Daniel Roxin
"Why none of this present in our history manuals to generate pride for our national identity" Way It is not present in you history manual? " please can you explain this.
The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, published in 2016
Cambridge History of the Romance Languages came to the conclusion that the "historical, archaeological and linguistic data available do not seem adequate to give a definitive answer" in the debate.[2] Their view was accepted by scholars.Romanian language is descended from Latin, not Dacian
There are no significant surviving written examples of the Dacian language, so it is difficult to verify in most cases whether a given Romanian word is actually from Dacian or not.

[@gerulagerula5877]

why dont they mention DECEBAL? its like they fought alone. Mention the Persons which are included, they were heroes to conquer the roman empire

[@augusta9750]

and they have the Trajan's column because he won against Decebal...

[@StopFear]

@@augusta9750 Why? Decebal died by suicide. He didn't get to conquer Rome.

[@augusta9750]

​@@StopFear He didn't conquer Rome, but he was the most fearful enemy of Trajan in the Daco-Roman War. Because Trajan won against Decebal, he built the column, but they don't give enough credit to it. If you go to Rome, they don't even mention Decebal, they put there "Head of a Dacian" :)) like, what?

[@1HarryH]

all the major powers have always fallen ....

[@38starman]

Indeed! :)

[@kishanchali8752]

Rome crushed the dacians. Let that sink in.

[@StopFear]

@@kishanchali8752 Why let that sink in? Is anyone questioning it?

[@augustiniumihaila4466]

@@kishanchali8752 sure ...... from the 5 succesor kingdoms of Burebista's Empire , the romans conquered just 1 .... 14% of geto-dacian teritory .... and maintained a so called control just 165 years..... And after roman retreat, started the period of thraco-dacian emperors of Rome .... and later the fall of western part at the hands of geto-gots =)) . What to say ..... =)) real crushed the dacians =))

[@augustiniumihaila4466]

@Sizzil'n sausagebooi sure were many factors

[@SNP-1999]

This is an excellent documentary full of brilliant footage of authentic re-enactors, well researched and produced, and very well presented.

[@DJMRecordsreal]

Greetings from Romania.

[@danicornea]

The fate of each and every empires are the same, regardless the moment in history....it is common knowledge.....

[@jimparsons6803]

Some of the more successful muggers there ever were.

[@SNP-1999]

While it may have been true that Rome was at war somewhere in its gigantic empire at any given time, there were large areas in which peace reigned for decades or even centuries, far longer than ever before or afterwards in their history. The Pax Romana was indeed a fact of life for generations of citizens and non- citizens of the Roman empire.

[@petergibson2318]

The Dacians are back. Everywhere you look in Europe there are Dacia cars on the road.
Properly pronounced Datcha I believe.

[@cristolambert]

unde daca va uitati in spania in zone precum zamora, salamanca, avila sau nord centrul portugaliei se poarta costume populare la fel sau foarte apropiate cu cele din romania

[@NASAE-wt1ec]

In toata Europa se poarta,toti venim din acelasi popor

[@charlesb5333]

This leaves me with more questions than answers.

[@NASAE-wt1ec]

You can research for "Zalmoxis- the geto-dacian god" or something like this and "o parere despre daci", the second one is also in english after the 2nd minute

[@dumitruchirita6983]

They talked about the romans but ther was allmost no Information about the daciens

[@a0flj0]

The information on Dacians is scarce in general.

[@almighty5839]

@@a0flj0 ^^ also what documentary series is thos

[@jburr6527]

the slave traders. the tribe.

[@SNP-1999]

The term "century" (100) seems to be somewhat misleading, considering that it comprised 80 fighting men (legionaries).
However, in reality a century comprised ten squads of contubernii, each with 8 men PLUS one recruit (Tiro) in training, and one servant (Calo) for the contubernium = tent squad, led by a Decanus (one of the 8 men). This of course amounts to 80 legionaries, plus10 Tirones and 10 Calones = 100 men per century, hence its name. The recruits and servants would usually defend the camp when the legion deployed for battle.

[@StopFear]

That synthesizer music is so horrible and so typical of documentaries from mostly 90s

[@danicornea]

Dacia was never a wilderness....Homeland of brave population for many centuries b.c. Daco- Getae part of ancient Tharacians biggest indo-europeans origin population...

[@thehunter9430]

One of my favorite story's.

[@almighty5839]

What documentary is this

[@mannyschiopu3959]

Who is Dacia? The Greeks talk about them, the Romans talk about them and even the Thracians talk about this group of people’s???? Who’s hiding these stories? They sound and seem like they had it made before “All” the rest claimed their story.

[@histguy101]

Dacians were a tribe that lived north of the Danube, north of Moesia, which is north of Thrace.
What do you want to know?! They uhh... Lived there. The Romans conquered much if Dacian territory in the early second century, annexed it as a province, which was very wealthy and became Romanized. The province was semi-abandoned in the late 3rd(Legions left) century.
Goths migrated into the region around the same time. The province was briefly reconquered by Constantine in the 320s and 330s. There were several more campaigns there throughout the fourth century. The Goths moved en masse(all men, women, and children) south of the Danube throughout the 4th and 5th century.
Dacia was overrun by Huns, Slavs, Avars, Bulgars, and others, in successive wavesthen Bulgars in the 7th and 8th.
All these various groups, along with the natives, along with any Romans who settled there, make up the modern nations of Romania, Serbia, Bulgaria, and also Hungary, Moldova, to some extent Ukraine. And you could include the more southern Balkan states as well since so many of these tribes settled far south of the Danube.

[@NASAE-wt1ec]

@@histguy101 ,goths or getae were the same!

[@cristolambert]

si pe acel sigiliu scrie de la inceputul filmului DACPETOPORIA si DAGAE si GAETE(GOT). precum spune si lituanianul alexander rakus ca gotii s-au numit si GET, GAETAE, GAUT, GEAT.

[@imre-janosmate9518]

de unde mai scoti atatea lucruri interesante? Asa si-au scris istoria multe popoare in sec XIX, toti incercand sa convinga lumea ca sunt cei mai buni, frumosi, gloriosi, etc...Viasat History a difuzat un documentar cu aceasta tema

[@NASAE-wt1ec]

@@imre-janosmate9518 , e geto-daci. Dacii erau geti. Ai dreptate,multi au falsificat istoria,cum ar fi Ungaria,o tara de geti albi care cred acum ca s-ar trage din huni

[@costine1]

Treasure under Sargetia river and catch the Decebalus king of Dacia by betrayal. The real is that for this war the Romans used 12 legions (they crushed Germanic tribes with only 4) they build the bridge on Danube (engineer Apolodor from Damascus) and after the victory the celebrate with 123 days of games in Rome. The Decebal suicide before capturing. The real war never ended as the Ostrogoth are thracians as Dacians end they faith against Romans continuously until the Romans leaved Dacia after

[@tituspullo9768]

To much auto fellatio for you.

[@histguy101]

Well, there were detachments from 12 legions. They can't just pull full legions off the frontiers for a campaign in one corner of the empire.
Also, the number of legions is irrelevant, as they were still comparable sized armies. Actually, the Romans may have been outnumbered.
How many Legions were needed to conquer Gaul? 6-10?
How many Legions to put down the 2nd Jewish revolt? 10! If it can take 10 Legions to put down a revolt in Judea, which had already been depopulated 60 years earlier, then what's wrong with 12 legions for the conquest of Dacia?
Lastly, the Goths did not speak the same language as the Dacians. They were not kinsman, although the Goths did settle in Dacia in the 3rd century. Constantine built a bridge across the Danube and achieved victory over both the Dacians and Goths, and thus was granted the title Dacicus, and Gothicus.

[@augustiniumihaila4466]

@@tituspullo9768 check from ancient records up to Carlos Troya. Even with damnatio memoriae casted by pope Leon and emperor Ioan Apostate , all ancient and medieval recordings agree that gots are in fact geto-dacians. So , as you like it, go suck yourself.

[@augustiniumihaila4466]

@@histguy101 Wrong. All records indicate that roman armies involved in Dacian warrs were the largest Rome ansembled ever, and also warr effort was the biggest Rome ever done. As for gots, all ancient and medieval records, up to Carlos Troya agree that gots are in fact geto-dacians, not some fantasy german population. From the succesor kingdoms of Burebista empire , Rome conquered just 1 / 5 , 14 % of teritory.

[@histguy101]

@@augustiniumihaila4466 Rome conquered all of Decabalus's kingdom. They conquered the kingdom of Dacia. I see people repeating this 14% number online as though it's been ingrained into you in school. it's nonsense. look at a map.
Burebista had his own confederation and hegemony. They weren't all Dacians.
the Goths did not speak a Thracian language, but a Germanic language. By the time they settled in former Dacian territory, the Dacians themselves had been resettled south of the Danube.

[@alanschwartz7073]

Ahhhh, a real documentary with a real narrator, no a robot voice, no gammer animation, no wikipedia clips,.no channel host taking away from content

[@trevorpeddicord1631]

This is one of the most well put documentary I've ever seen.

[@38starman]

Thank you for watching :)

[@trevorpeddicord1631]

no problem, If you can find more like that i will watch them all

[@38starman]

Trevor Peddicord :)

[@obskur.records]

They just said "great roman empire paid tribute to barbarians" and you said "one of the most well put documentary..."
Did america paid tribute to hitler or stalin?
Did america build statues with/for/about them and their bravery and dignity in Washington? Hmmm...

[@davidmoser7849]

WELL PUT

[@cosminfinearts1081]

When Trajan conquered 5% of Dacia said: I'm on the land of my ancestors... This is mentioned by a lot of historians of the time . Look at the pathological print of the nations , who comes from where ???? Even the firs writing in the world was discovered in Dacia , modern day Romania . tartaria tablets , 2000 years older than Sumerian writing. Dated with carbon by an Italian scientists, so how can we come from Romans . Egypt , Asians and a lot of this nation have been under Roman Empire for 400-800 years and non of them speaks Latin ...5% of Dacia was under Roman occupation for 100 years and you tell us that we come from Latin???? The Vatican was hidden the truth for centuries but slowly slowly the truth is coming up !!!

[@mitzucelrau]

Trajan conquered 70% of Dacia. They only colonized 40% of Dacia, because they removed the roman administration from the rest of the teritory in 117.
"Even the firs writing in the world was discovered in Dacia , modern day Romania . tartaria tablets , 2000 years older than Sumerian writing" - You have no ideea what you are talking about. Ceramics cannot be dated using carbon, so you are lying. The Tartaria tablets have been dated based on the other object found in that site. But no one can say if they are legit, based on the story of how they were found many say that they are fake. And it's not a writing sistem, like the one in Sumer, it is based on pictograms. If you consider pictograms as writing, you will find that "the oldest writing" was found in China, 1000 years before Tartaria. But you are just a sheep that repeats what he heard on internet without using his mind to understand the truth.

[@raulbogdan100]

@@mitzucelrau True.What this man said, I heard from several other dacian lovers.They all repeat the same things like parrots and listen and read what other crazy people say, such as Daniel Roxin, who in my oppinon should write fairy tales instead of talking about history.I'm noy saying don't be interested in our ancestors, i'm all about that, but these people are just making up bullshits so that they can make the Dacians sound like the most glorious nation in the universe.They base stuff on name similarities for instance.Like, juat because the name Goths and Getae are somewhat similar, it means they are the same.But it's wrong, they were not the same.I even heard someone say that Germany is called Deutschland because of the Dacians, and that the germans are in fact Dacians.I mean c'mon...

[@claudiaologounicolaou3208]

Victor Popescu. Pentru cunoștința ta generală!...”In the city Tărtăria, Alba County, in 1961 was discovered an important religious complex; the material showed a continuity of habitation for several thousand years. Among others, they found three sensational clay tablets, which according to the isotope carbon 14 dating were made at least 6,500 years ago.“ www.thelivingmoon.com/46ats_members/Lisa2012/03files/Tartaria_Tablets.html

[@iulianzagan779]

@@claudiaologounicolaou3208 , I bet the difference: " The dating of the tablets is difficult as they cannot be carbon-dated and the stratigraphy is uncertain. " (see en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/T%C4%83rt%C4%83ria_tablets)

[@antoniudraculea4507]

''When Trajan conquered 5% of Dacia said''
Trajan conquered 100% of today's Romania and turned like 80% of it into a roman province. The fact some imagine Dacia to have spread from the Danube up to Mars isn't an argument.
''said: I'm on the land of my ancestors... ''
He never said such a thing, that's a modern invention. Bring a source please.
''Even the firs writing in the world was discovered in Dacia''
They're fakes I'm afraid.
''so how can we come from Romans . Egypt , Asians and a lot of this nation have been under Roman Empire for 400-800 years and non of them speaks Latin '''
The western part of the roman empire was latin speaking the eastern part was greek. Latinisation was only attempted in the West and it was a 90% success. Virtually all of the western roman empire speaks a latin language or spoke at one point in the past.
In the east (Asia) wasn't attempted. Hellenisation was and it had notable results.
'or 100 years and you tell us that we come from Latin???? ''
Most of today's Romania was a roman province for aprox. 175 years, not 100 years, and a vassal of the Eastern Roman Empire for centuries to come. Dobrogea (10% of today's Romania) was roman for like 600-700 years.
For comparrison, the USA was British for aprox 175 years as well and it ended up almost completely anglo-saxonized.

[@EMantraOfficial1]

"barbarians"? :))) who is the joker who made this documentary.. The dacians were advanced in most of the fields from that perriod.. The belagin codes were ahead of everything history have seen before

[@annadrew4]

You're wrong. Many historians have described them as "barbarians." That's the truth, whether you like it or not.

[@dwizzleusa4202]

Lol..dude come on..they were barbarians to romans..they didn't have a written language, culture, many things that was barbarian to Roman's. Barbarians means foreign, or uncivilized.

[@annadrew4]

@Costea Bogdan No bine ca o stii tu.

[@annadrew4]

@Costea Bogdan Ei bine asa s-a inteles de mii de ani ca ar fii "barbarii". Si degeaba imi scrii mie aici in romana. Scrie in engleza ca sa inteleaga si restul.

[@Etelezoli]

The only observation I have to make is the statement: (when the conquerors left) they should have come to be called Romania !?

[@agentzero147]

Where is the original? The Roman Way of War documentary?

[@Adrian375a]

i am from this place you speak about

[@gabriel2fan]

Nice documentary

[@TheItalianTrash]

As an Italian/Hungarian American which side I'm I supposed to root for? Since all roads didn't lead to Transylvania, I'll go with the Romans.

[@mr.marius5094]

we dont need hungarians in transilvania :))

[@NASAE-wt1ec]

You are just geto-pelasgian as us romanians. We are all brothers. And in Transylvania is enough place for all of us to live in peace

[@TheItalianTrash]

@@NASAE-wt1ec A few of my older Hungarian relatives are apparently still "angry" that Hungary lost Transylvania to Romania after WW1. Maybe next time they will be on the winning side of a World War. :)

[@NASAE-wt1ec]

@@TheItalianTrash , Transylvania was always a geto-dacian/romanian land and was never ruled by hungarians but by austro-hungarians. Hungary is romanian, slovakian and austrian land. If they wanna win,we invite them! :)

[@TheItalianTrash]

@@NASAE-wt1ec My Hungarian side can be traced to the small village of Rimetea (Torocko) in Alba County. These relatives of mine live in New York and already have one foot in the grave, but it seems their whole lives they have had a victim mentality. It's even stranger that half of them have never even been to Europe! Seriously not too long ago two of them were bitching that the Ottomans conquered Constantinople (which happened in 1453 AD) and that the Muslims should give back Hagia Sophia to the Byzantines. Lol. I'd still love to visit both Hungary and Romania some day, but Google Earth will have to do for now.

[@cristolambert]

asta este adevarul si trebuie sa li se spuna verde in fata tuturor strainilor. ca got si get erau denumiri care desemnau poporul getic. la fel si gepizii si vandalii asdingi. si ca ei getii au distrus imperiul roman si pe urma si-au facut regat in italia, spania si o perioada mai scurta de timp au ocupat parti din sudul frantei .

[@florinpanuta2721]

Sa inteleg ca de aceea sunt asa multe statui cu daci la roma? Dar cum au reusit sa-si faca regat in imperiul roman??

[@florinpanuta2721]

Mai da-mi detalii te rog, chiar ma intereseaza asta.. Stiu ca un imparat roman, Regalian parca a fost dac..

[@raulbogdan100]

@@florinpanuta2721 Tot ce zice acel domn sunt baliverne.Gotii, Gepizii Vandalii erau popoare germanice si se stie foarte clar asta.Se stiu limbile vorbite de ei, care erau germanice.Limba dacilor/tracilor este necunoscuta.Faptul ca era similara cu romana de azi iara este doar o teorie, nu e bazata pe nimic real.Iar in caz ca acesti dacopati nu stiu, exista o stiinta care se numeste genetica.Si exisa teste de ADN care pot verifica originea cadavrelor.Asa ca nu mai credeti toate basmele spuse de niste nebuni care habar n.au ce vorbesc.

[@ToaderMatei]

Adevarat getii erau inruditi cu gotii

[@bobanas78]

@@raulbogdan100 Baietas, "Limba noastra-i o comoara in adancuri infundata [...]" si intradevar, nici nu stii ce limba vorbesti.

[@eduard-vz1sq]

I don’t like the way he talks about Dacians, they weren’t animals or savages. In fact they were pretty respected by the Romans, and shared similar stuff

[@cristolambert]

no, you are a moron sergey glavan. the goths were other name for the geths. so the goths were indeed getish people. the goths were getish baltic tribes not german. so you sergey glavan do you not know history.

[@sorinturle4599]

invata istorie adevarata, nu prostii "Savesti".Gotii n-au nici pe dracu' a face cu getii.

[@cristolambert]

hahahaa. sa crezi tu asta ca nu au nimic de a face. gotii sunt chiar getii. sunt acelasi popor cu getii

[@cristolambert]

asa ca sorinel draga tu nu cunosti istoria adevarata. din pacate. si este trist fiindca este vorba despre istoria stramosilor nostri


[@USB740]

Goths originally came from what is now Sweden. They migrated south into the continent.

[@iulianzagan779]

Gots and Gets have similar names but nothing else. Gots were germanic tribes while gets (geto-dacians) are thracian tribes.

[@costine1]

Not fully real story. The true is partial in the movie. The Romans conquered only 20

[@davidmoser7849]

TRAJAN SAYS SHOW ME THE MONEY THATS THE BOTTOM LINE

[@38starman]

Not sure, if it is I have not seen any other episodes.

[@38starman]

Agreed. :)

[@cristianpopescu78]

Dacians was defeadet after they killed a Legion and the Comander Cornelius Fuscus.Moldawia was never conquered and ocupied.Dacians soon accepted latin language and roman citizen in the hole Dacia .Moldawia too where the Carp Tribe lived.All rivers Name till today was preserved-Alutus-Olt, Ordesos-Arges,Maris-Mures,Samus -Somes

[@sergekrieger3145]

cristian popescu what Moldavia. there was no Moldavia. The gold was what Romans were after and they took what they needed and along Danube so that it would be easier to defend the borders. All Roman borders along major and most important directions ran along rivers. There was no reason to conquer poor bastards who lived further as conquest would not pay for itself. it is not about chest pumping. Romans did not conquer for the sake of conquest, but either if it was worth it or they needed to create buffer.

[@3dwardcullen69]

+Serge Krieger The main reason why the Romans colonized Dacia is because it was economically viable to do so. Hadrian (who was defensive-minded) wanted to withdraw the Roman frontier back to the Danube but all of his advisers argued against that idea, since there were already so many Roman colonists in Dacia. Also, the Dacians weren't your average barbarians; they were not "poor bastards" as you say. All of the evidence points towards a culture which was slightly more advanced than the Germanic tribes. The Dacian gold plundered during Trajan's campaigns funded building projects in Rome which is responsible for a majority of the ancient monuments that we see in Rome today.

[@ash8207]

+The Libertine The Dacians weren't your average barbarians ? No, they actually weren't barbarians at all. Unless you are referring to the original Greek meaning of "barbarian" meaning foreign or non-Greek, then yes they were "barbarians" ie. non-Greek. Their golden bracelets & other exquisite jewelry are a testament to the fact that they were more than just "slightly more advanced" than the Germanic tribes. Not to mention that Sarmizegetusa Regia, their capital contained a very accurate calendar for its time. The Dacians were also respected in the ancient world for their metal craftsmanship, medicinal studies, spirituality, fighting spirit and other notable attributes taught to them by the legendary Zalmoxis & Deceneu. Their culture is recorded by some of the most famous Greek & even Roman historians & writers as one of the most enlightened & developed. Their main defect was that they were very independent & divided, as Herodotus mentions. That led to the assassination of Burebista & later Decebal's downfall unfortunately. But you are correct about Hadrian & the gold being plundered to finance Traian's projects. Also it saved Rome from economic collapse.
By the way, excuse me for saying this but I find it very odd, cowardly & insincere when you brand people "dacopats" or "dacomaniacs" simply because they point out documented facts & objective observations about the Romans and the Dacians. It's a shame really because here you seem to make good, valid points and yet other times you resort to baseless & immature character attacks against folks who aren't infatuated with Rome or point out things about the Dacians. When & how did we come to this point, where people interested in Dacian history are just mindlessly branded as having a "mental disorder" ? I just find that so arrogant & pretentious. Plus it's totally unnecessary & detrimental to the debate. You are welcome to argue, debate & disagree, but let's do it like normal intelligent people...with facts, evidence, something substantial. But please don't argue with silly insults, it doesn't prove you right at all. I already erased your earlier non-sense, but I welcome an honest debate with you anytime, if you are capable & willing. Or is it just going to be more inane insults from you ? Hopefully not, but we'll see. Have a nice day !

[@ash8207]

+cristian popescu Lol, the Dacians accepted the Latin language ? This old, baseless propaganda again. What a bunch of non-sense. Give me a break, please ! The Romans were only there for a relatively short time and only on a fraction of Dacian territory. Yes, there were some Dacians who accepted Roman citizenship and spoke Latin, but to say the entire Dacian society was "romanized" is a ridiculous farce. And then, the Romans, also "latinized" the Free Dacians, the very people that were fighting them in a brutal insurgency to oust them from Dacia. Yeah, ok, whatever. Sorry but this is just a baseless fantasy, a fairy tale that sadly & absurdly has been passed off as the "official history" of Romania.

[@3dwardcullen69]

Dacian Spirit 75 Your entire Dacononsense religion is based on misinterpretations and fabrications of history. as well as a poor grasp of greco-roman mythology. Save me your paragraphs of bullshit. No academic or historian gives Dacomania a second glance. I wonder why (sarcasm). Your crackpot theory has been debunked a long time ago. I don't mean to be this cruel but you really have no idea what you're talking about. So continuing to perpetuate Napoleon Savescu's nonsense just proves your lack of intelligence.

[@peter-df6wl]

Narrator sad 20:46 "Bay the time they left, Dacia become to be called Romania"😆 Can't possibly be true What a liar In 1859, Wallachia united with Moldavia to form the United Principalities, which adopted the name Romania in 1866 .😃🤮

[@dacvs301]

Wallachia means the land were ROME citizens live and/or were latin speakers live. (civis romanus natus dacus). Wallachia = Terra Romana. Tara Romanilor sau Tara Romaneasca/Pamant Romanesc.Numele de Romania a fost folosit si pt Bizantium. Iar acolo predomina lb greaca deci e posibil ca Wallachia/Vlah sa insemne mai degraba STATUTUL SOCIAL decat NATIA IN SINE. Despre natie/sangele acestor valahi lasam traditiile, hainele, armele, numele si oculatiile sa vorbeasca

[@peter-df6wl]

@@dacvs301 In 1859, Wallachia united with Moldavia to form the United Principalities, which adopted the name Romania in 1866 .🤔

[@dacvs301]

@@peter-df6wl Ofcourse. But only Moldovans changed their country name once they united. As Wallachia already meant Romania.Turks knew Moldavia as Wallachia too. Kara Iflak was called to Wallachia and Ak Iflak or Bogdan Iflak was called to the lands of Moldova. Poland also called Moldova as Vlahia. So the name Romania was already in use for both countries way way way before Union of the two.

[@peter-df6wl]

@@dacvs301 So Tara Romaneasca land of the Romanians. Wallachians are Romanians.
So where the Wallachians come from?
What language Wallachians speak?
Wo impressive. Romanian the oldest language in Europe, older even than Sanskrit. According to the researchers and scientists, the Latin comes from the old Romanian and not vice versa.👍

[@mauritsnap]

is this part of series?

[@almighty5839]

What series

[@lucaferrari2106]

Nell'inno nazionale rumeno
si parla di Traiano e questo in suo onore dato che romani e daci alla fine della guerra erano alleati
contro chi avesse attaccato la Dacia

[@lucaferrari2106]

In romeno blood there is
DNA of romans and Dacians ..proud of this
🇮🇹🤚🇮🇹🤚👍🇮🇹🦅🇮🇹🇮🇹
legion aeterna victrix
( latin ) huhuuuuu!!!

[@merkelvanneinderman9562]

not. Romania is Romania and . Romania is the land of romans and i am romanian
bye

[@ksa35772]

تراجان ملك الرومان

[@andriano22]

Traiascä DACIA

[@lucaferrari2106]

🇮🇹🤝🇹🇩

[@vladgetu]

Wtf is that when they left Dacia was called Romania???? Wtf

[@billyvan8362]

SPQR