I met a former drone pilot. He said it was very difficult because he would leave his home where he lived with his wife and kids, go to work, do drone strikes, then come home to his family after killing up to 30 people. It really messed with his head. Often times, he only had information from people on the ground. Yes, he made the decision to fire, but in reality, he said its the people feeding him information that control his actions. He has no way of really verifying himself.
I've heard the way how some of their guys were treat'ed it's horr'ible the guys need better treatment for stuff like simply kil.ling people at the simple push of a button. Such as things like how I heard one pilot was someone was treated awful how people didn't understand how drones affect the pilots of drones. That's what I heard, can you tell me anything about that if the drone pilot said anything besides that?
As a reporter, you would think that she would know that its standard practice for the military to derresolution footage when publicly released. The footage isnt fuzzy. The footage YOURE seeing is. They dont have the same issues, and even if they did it has nothing to do with the strikes, failure to gather intel and other issues are a bigger point to discuss than something like that...
Her specific wording was "One of the issues that have been brought up." It's unclear who the original source that brought up the issue is in this context. It could be outside sources or it could be the US military making the statement.
@@__alt__568 That has nothing to do with the point that was made. Knowingly raising a point that you know to be false is unethical. The point is, she SHOULD know. Classic red herring.
Doubtful. The major areas of military engineering that are sensitive nowadays is the actual technical data relation to systems engineering requirement, software coding, and schematic designs for all the electrical components / instruments. You didn't see any of that here, so there isn't any information disseminated that would damage national security concerns.
that, but also, ISIS at least has been known to create the conditions for a catastrophe, literally setting up some of their own atop explosives and hostages in situations likely to lead to a airstrike so they can swoop in to harvest the resentment and outrage.
Agreed. There are 3 options for these kinds of missions 1: Send in a ground team and risk the lives of many more people 2: use a drone and have them loiter and wait and have nobody at risk besides potential ground casualties 3: Send a B-2 bomber with the same or potentially less intel due to their inability to loiter and carpet bomb an entire neighborhood to kill 1 guy.
That human rights lady saying you cant feel the same cultural sensitivity as if you were flying in an actual fighter jet. Like what? You can’t tell who the hell is down there or what culture they are from being a mile in the air😂😂😂
She explains it in the rest of the sentence about being embedded in the region. As a pilot actually flying the plane you might be stationed in that area and therefore interacting with people from the region where you're dropping bombs. You will talk to soldiers who go patrolling the area. You will have a greater connection to people of that region.
A lot of times, it is not the drone pilot who makes the decision to fire. The decision goes through a "Kill chain". Drone crews identify a potential target, the imagery is sent to higher ups, analysts, and even lawyers to make the call.
@@annasadIt means mistakes happened... Doesn't necessarily mean the whole process is flawed. This is war, shit happens, obviously. The goal should be to make improvements.
When I was an artillery forward observer in Vietnam, I had the same fears of killing the wrong people, you do the best you can with the data you have at the time and pray you are correct, it is why war is referred to as an art.
What about going around killing innocent farmers for no reason and than peeing on them ? Your army has been doing that on video and you can watch it I mean come on stop acting as if it's so difficult for y'all to kill the "wrong people" 😂
Good thing suicide bomber works that way, with the data they had, they prayed that they were correct. It is an art actually seeing blood splatter here and there. Hallelujah
A pilot 2 miles in the sky looking at cameras and sensors isn't in any better position to gauge ethics of the activity on the ground than a guy in a box on us soil looking at cameras and sensors. Its clear that insufficent intelligence gathering or the checks and balances of the aproval process that either pilot, remote or local, would have to go through isn't good enough. Being able to delete a person without any immediate risk should be something done cautiously and only with 100% guaranteed success.
02:16 that idiot really said cultural sensitivity. Does she think pilots who fly "fixed wing" planes knows culture of the enemy or cares about culture.
A Russian Su-27 did not collide with an MQ-9 over Syria, however a Su-27 did ram into a MQ-9 over the Black Sea, Russian Su-35s dumped flares on an MQ-9 in Syria but that's not what you meant, please try to be accurate in your reporting next time. For anyone wondering the narrator says something at the end about A su-27 colliding with a MQ-9 over Syria where the footage from the MQ-9 being rammed over the Black Sea is shown.
The thing I don't quite understand is: Why blame the *drone* for the civilian casualties? Even if it was a manned aircraft, the outcome would have been the same. It still would have looked like a threat, if the operator/pilot was in the aircraft or not, they're seeing the same thing.
Yes they may have seen the same thing but they are trained very differently and derfor are thinking very different about the decision making. You can’t ignore that the experience of being there in a cockpit sure is more intense and different than not being there many miles away.
@@luffirton There isn't any intel or decision making difference between a manned or unmanned aircraft. The pilot sees the exact same thing. Many of the optical suites are even the exact same. This is a lot like gun control. An AR-15 seems scary because the media tells you it is, but no one bats an eye at a 22lr handgun which historically has been used in way more murders than an AR-15.
@@chltmdwp They're considered pilots. theyre physically controlling the plane through the GCS and have a sensor operator controlling the camera. Both are considered Pilot/Co-pilot in the MQ9. They both get their aviator wings just as any F-16/F-35 pilot would.
Correct, if you look at the pilot's HUD at 12:55 you can see his flight graphics are overlayed on top of what the targeting pod is looking at on the ground, not what is in front of them in the sky. This is how they fly 95% of the time. So although they may be flying in VFR conditions, they are still flying exclusively on instruments since the camera is pointed at the ground
Must be nice to be able to visit Cannon AFB, film for a little bit, and then get the hell out. My thoughts and prayers go out to the poor airmen stationed there.
7:42 they always talk about fuzzy footage; but this is mostly classified military craft... meaning the footage we are seeing has been processed and stripped of quality and function. Anything you see is a factor of 10 worse than what the government actually sees. Why? Well for one thing, the government can't let their adversaries know actual capabilities or that could lead to enemies creating development goals based on those. So let's stop saying the "footage was blurry."
Let us get this straight... The drone pilots are not to blame whatsoever.. They are NOT the ones who decide to engage or not to engage.. They have a shot-caller that gets and gives clearances to fire... The pilots just do what they are told to do by the powers above...
Pretty much. They do have the final say in releasing the weapon as pilot in command, which basically means they can still refuse to release a weapon for any reason. Ultimately though the authority and main decision/clearance is received from up the chain after going through a whole vetting process. Pilots can deny any clearance given, but they can't independently clear themselves to engage a target if that makes sense.
@@Itzskimpy Responsibility is shared across multiple authorities. Choosing to take a life is never one person's sole responsibility as I explained in my other reply. Sure, pilots choose to fly the aircraft, but they are not just bloodthirsty killers. It's a profession that's taken very seriously to avoid unnecessary noncombatant casualties to the max extent possible.
My late uncle was an infantryman in the 96th Division on Okinawa and told my dad of an incident that should have killed him, but he survived. Uncle's company was spread out moving through some tall grass as they carefully looked for the enemy. My uncle said as he took a step, the soil felt spongy, and his step was immediately followed by a blast that threw him backwards. He was covered with blood and bits of tissue. Fellow soldiers rushed to him, thinking he was wounded. As it turned out, aside from ringing ears and being shaken up, he was whole and uninjured. What the soldiers found was a Japanese soldier in a camoflauged foxhole who apparently detonated a grenade under his chin, blowing off his head and helmet. As to why the fragments didn't hit my uncle, they figured the enemy's helmet and the material covering the foxhole deflected and absorbed some of the blast. My uncle survived the Battle of Okinawa and was one of the few men in his company who made it through without being wounded or killed. The fighting was so bad, the above story was the only battle incident he would discuss after the war with my dad, who was also a soldier.
Great story. Tough men. My grandmother remembers fondly the chewing gum and chocolate she got from a GI. A stark contrast to a group of German soldiers standing around the corpse of a young man laying in a pool of blood. We Europeans are eternally grateful.
@@markusmeldre Because some reaper drone operators are conflicted and struggle with civilian life after killing people. The same way his uncle struggled after fighting the Japanese.
Not the issue here! The real cockroaches are living large in America. Ppl are not a priority. Politicians are only concern about ppl when there’s an election. And ppl need to understand that. Which they haven’t!
While it's messed up and more should be done to prevent civilian deaths, how is a remote pilot any different than a guy sitting in a cockpit thousands of feet up? Pilots are detached from the ground no mater what.
@@untasty4215 Modern cockpits are more video game like than ever. They're not looking down on people out of the window, they're looking at screens and graphical displays. They're getting almost the same view as a remote pilot. Neither of them are anywhere near the explosion. Both of them are looking at computer screens and pressing a button. They're both nowhere near the explosion and they're far away from any possible retaliation. I'm not defending bombing innocent civilians. I'm only saying that putting pilots in actual planes wouldn't change anything. They're both detached.
It's taking away the single only way of succeeding in fighting back from whoever's home towns are being decimated, if you're going to all but indiscriminately kill people then stick your leg out more than not at all, if you kill someone's friend, child or other family, be prepared to die as a consequence.
In this case, does matter that they're not in a manned aircraft. Most manned aircraft just get orders to boom and zoom on targets in a matter of hours. The MQ-9 crews can do that, but most of the time they observe targets for upwards of months before striking them. All-in-all it is much, much more personal for MQ-9 crews, hence the higher likelihood of PTSD than manned pilots, especially considering they can't talk to friends and family about classified flights even though they go home to "normal life" the same day unlike being deployed. I grew up on playing Call of Duty back in the day and it doesn't compare at all. There's a difference between just playing a game and working a lethal profession.
@coldzero9174 you're so lucky that UA-cam did not censor/delete your comment. I posted a similar comment which got deleted by UA-cam none-sense algorithm LOL
20 Years ago you used to see the Happy Hooligans occasionally flying their F-16's. When I transferred to NDSU I lived off-campus and parked at the Fargodome and remember hearing them when they would land or takeoff while I would be walking to class...It was unbearably loud sometimes.
it doesn't matter if a pilot is in a fix wing craft. they are just pushing buttons and never have to see their targets up close and personal. if they want uo close and personal, have better digital image processing with better resolutions.
In a way yes the pilots are just button pushers and have a minimal role in the decision to strike a target, but in this case it very much does matter that they're not in a manned aircraft. Most fixed-wing aircraft just get orders to boom and zoom on targets in a matter of hours. The MQ-9 crews can do that, but most of the time they observe targets for upwards of months before striking them. All-in-all it is much, much more personal for MQ-9 crews, hence the higher likelihood of PTSD than manned pilots.
I was so close to getting this job on my ASVAB and was depressed because I wanted to protect people without putting myself in danger. I will try again when I get to the end of my mos contract
Irrespective of a drone or a physical fighter aircraft performing a sortie, the decision has already been made and the mode of execution does the alter the intended outcome however twisted and sinister or justified it might be. You are in the armed forces and the powers that be have spent a lot of money to make sure you have learnt to follow orders.
That's right, and as a remote pilot it is not just your decision to kill, it's the entire chain of command. You get a special opportunity to do this very specializes work, don't cry about it after... You know who is plugging up the VA system with patients, kids that volunteer to go into the military to perform a duty, then come home and complain they have PTSD and receive a lifetime of disability because a bomb went off near them or they were shot at!
@@onazram1 The veteran's human guilt if any in America's so called shit storms around the world is at least addressed in their medical centres as taking lives can never be justified. Unfortunately nothing changes with the change of guard at the executive level of govt or in Capital Hill. You sign up in the US armed forces to satisfy the agendas of the elite in US govt and Capital Hill. There was 1% inspiration and 99% corruption in the so called War on terror. It should actually have been called War of Terror. Fortunately "to the best of my knowledge", India is no Pakistan for America to openly use armed drones.
Not sure why this video is skipping this vital piece of information. Those pilots have layers of approval prior to firing. None of them are firing "at-will".
@@mskettelhut because then some Congress man Or woman will have the bright idea to get involved. I think John Rizzo(CIAs chief legal officer for more than 20 years) stated that they deliberately omitted that info to avoid congress from probing too hard.
Russians may get flack for the Moscow Theater Crisis, but you go to hand it to them, they stopped domestic terrorism better than when Bill Clinton, Obama, and Biden gave terrorists billions of dollars in return for hostages and incentivize terror.
So having no pilots onboard allows to consult additional staff in the ground control unit. Cause they couldn‘t attach cameras to the drone, if there are pilots in the aircraft?
The MQ-9 Reaper drone has become a crucial part of modern warfare, with its portability and long-range capabilities allowing it to reach remote locations. However, the use of drones has also been controversial due to concerns about civilian casualties. In August 2022, the Pentagon finalized a civilian harm mitigation and response action plan to address this issue. The MQ-9 Reaper is piloted from a ground control station, which can be located up to 1600 miles away from the drone. The drone's missions include gathering intelligence, surveillance, combat search and rescue, providing close air support, and precision strikes. The Air Force has been operating remotely piloted aircraft for a couple of decades now, with the MQ-1 Predator being modified to fire missiles in 2001. The MQ-9 Reaper succeeded the Predator with advanced capabilities and longer endurance. Drone pilots are trained to avoid harm to innocent civilians, with a process in place to ensure the correct target is identified and any collateral damage is accounted for. However, mistakes have occurred in the past due to the emotional distance between the pilot and the target. The use of drones in modern warfare is a controversial topic due to concerns about civilian casualties. The Pentagon has developed a plan to address this issue, and drone pilots are trained to minimize harm to innocent civilians.
Wake up awful Troll, no drone in the world is unbeatable! But for sure the MQ-9 Reaper is the best in the world! What about the thousands drones Russia has lost in Ukraine.
@@XX-166 That's not the point he's conveying, neither is he making an assertion, as he's presenting a hypothetical situation, which is justified by real-world instances of collateral damage. He's raising a point about the moral implications of drone operations, which you seem to interpret as an attack on the experience of the operators.
@@JustinRM20 you seem to assert that you’re a pro and have walked in the shoes of the drone operators. You have zero knowledge and there’s no need to be someone else’s public relations girl… they can speak for themselves.
@@XX-166 I'm surprised by your ability to discern whether I have knowledge on a subject by a UA-cam comment. I wish I had the power to dictate who replies to me (preferably only those who agree with me, those who don't have a Hellfire missile knocking on their roof).
Did you know the Iranian people call Qassem Soleimani "Kotlet" after he was killed by MQ-9 Reaper, Kotlet is an Iranian food, simliar to a hamburger that is made with meat and potato, after Soleimani was killed, the term became popular among the Iranian people, that's how much the Iranian people despise the regime and it's people.
War has truly come a long way since WWII. 80 years ago, we could accept 250k ppl dying in one battle. Now the numbers are far, far less. I couldn't imagine the mindsets of the soldiers in that time.
It is brazen of them to admit they killed a military officer of another nation by the drone. Who will held somebody accountable killing someone without due process?
Hey Billy, replaceable but can't replace the embarrassing reputation of a multi million dollar drone brought down by a bunch of medeival sand dwellers.
0:19: ⚠ The MQ-9 Reaper drone has revolutionized modern warfare, but concerns about civilian casualties and mistakes made by remote pilots have overshadowed its effectiveness. 3:37: ✈ The MQ-9 Reaper is an unmanned aircraft known for its persistence and ability to loiter for long periods of time. 6:41: ✈ The MQ-9 Reaper is an unmanned aircraft equipped with advanced sensors and capable of carrying laser-guided missiles. 9:29: ✈ The Air Force's ground control station allows for additional personnel to assist in missions, such as doctors or survival experts. 12:19: ✈ The video discusses the use of drones in military operations and the importance of precision and accuracy in targeting. 14:44: ✈ The MQ-9 Reaper drone plays a vital role in military operations, but its pilots face emotional burdens and the need for continuous training to minimize civilian casualties. Recap by Tammy AI
😂Yemen's Houthis shot down another American MQ-9 Reaper attack UAV worth more than $10 million. Then they waited for an official statement from the Pentagon, which stated that “the drone fell due to a technical malfunction” and only after that they published a video of how they shot down an MQ-9 Reaper, catching the Americans in yet another lie))) It's easy to humiliate Americans when the truth is on your side)))
😂This is not true, because Yemen was able to shoot down six aircraft of this type with ease. You say it is advanced, but in reality it is just a game for the Yemeni army 😂😂
If I ever join the military I’m going be a drone pilot, less dangerous and less PTSD from what I’ve heard, due to desensitization from frankly videogames.
It is less dangerous for the pilot and sensor operators yes, but statistically a much greater likelihood of PTSD due to the amount of targets you prosecute, the length of time at which you prosecute them (sometimes upwards of a few months looking at one person), and the fact that most operations are classified that you can't tell family or friends about even though you go back to "normal life" the same day unlike being deployed. I grew up on playing Call of Duty back in the day and it doesn't compare at all. There's a difference between just playing a game and working a lethal profession.
I met a former drone pilot. He said it was very difficult because he would leave his home where he lived with his wife and kids, go to work, do drone strikes, then come home to his family after killing up to 30 people. It really messed with his head.
Often times, he only had information from people on the ground. Yes, he made the decision to fire, but in reality, he said its the people feeding him information that control his actions. He has no way of really verifying himself.
I've heard the way how some of their guys were treat'ed it's horr'ible the guys need better treatment for stuff like simply kil.ling people at the simple push of a button. Such as things like how I heard one pilot was someone was treated awful how people didn't understand how drones affect the pilots of drones. That's what I heard, can you tell me anything about that if the drone pilot said anything besides that?
also that's horrible for what happened to him
oh no poor guy. i hope hes alright unlike the collateral damage / people who just were going by their day
@@koiyujo1543Are you having a stroke as you typed that out?!?!
Were*
As a reporter, you would think that she would know that its standard practice for the military to derresolution footage when publicly released. The footage isnt fuzzy. The footage YOURE seeing is. They dont have the same issues, and even if they did it has nothing to do with the strikes, failure to gather intel and other issues are a bigger point to discuss than something like that...
Her specific wording was "One of the issues that have been brought up." It's unclear who the original source that brought up the issue is in this context. It could be outside sources or it could be the US military making the statement.
@@__alt__568 That has nothing to do with the point that was made. Knowingly raising a point that you know to be false is unethical. The point is, she SHOULD know. Classic red herring.
Is it really blurred? Someone send link to where it says this
@@__alt__568 shes still raising a false point in order to push a narrative she either knows or should know to be false.
It's not a lady reporting. It's a man. How can you not tell this is a man's voice????
The fact that the military is allowing this to be released means there is something better either available or close to being available
Shhhh …. (there is).
@calebhoi what? I didn’t say anything about the pilot firing here
Things get declassified over time, not really related to new and improved equipment. Capabilities tho are still for the most part classified.
Doubtful. The major areas of military engineering that are sensitive nowadays is the actual technical data relation to systems engineering requirement, software coding, and schematic designs for all the electrical components / instruments. You didn't see any of that here, so there isn't any information disseminated that would damage national security concerns.
this drone has been known about for years what are you saying
wouldn't killing civilians be more of an intelligence gathering problem rather than a drone/plane pilot problem?
that, but also, ISIS at least has been known to create the conditions for a catastrophe, literally setting up some of their own atop explosives and hostages in situations likely to lead to a airstrike so they can swoop in to harvest the resentment and outrage.
Pretty much...
It's a problem that they're using drones/planes when there is an intelligence problem
Agreed.
There are 3 options for these kinds of missions
1: Send in a ground team and risk the lives of many more people
2: use a drone and have them loiter and wait and have nobody at risk besides potential ground casualties
3: Send a B-2 bomber with the same or potentially less intel due to their inability to loiter and carpet bomb an entire neighborhood to kill 1 guy.
@@nikobelic4251sending in a b2 to kill one guy is just silly. Plane worth too much
That human rights lady saying you cant feel the same cultural sensitivity as if you were flying in an actual fighter jet. Like what? You can’t tell who the hell is down there or what culture they are from being a mile in the air😂😂😂
I’ve heard those cameras are reallyyyyyyy good 😬
She’s Jewish woman, her people or family is not the one being killed By the drone and the incompetent soulless pilots
She explains it in the rest of the sentence about being embedded in the region. As a pilot actually flying the plane you might be stationed in that area and therefore interacting with people from the region where you're dropping bombs. You will talk to soldiers who go patrolling the area. You will have a greater connection to people of that region.
You have gps and you know where you’re firing….how dumb are you
@souadh.7759 She isn’t Jewish for one. And two I would hardly call the pilots “incompetent and soulless”.
Yemen has shot down 12 mq9 reapers
With regular home made weapons…
A lot of times, it is not the drone pilot who makes the decision to fire. The decision goes through a "Kill chain". Drone crews identify a potential target, the imagery is sent to higher ups, analysts, and even lawyers to make the call.
You forgot the President
So what is the point of this check and balances if all that chain failed? Means the whole process was flawed.
@@annasadIt means mistakes happened... Doesn't necessarily mean the whole process is flawed. This is war, shit happens, obviously. The goal should be to make improvements.
the Houti has shot down one yesterday.-----
@@JL_____ Exactly. Glad you said it so I didn't have to. 😁
When I was an artillery forward observer in Vietnam, I had the same fears of killing the wrong people, you do the best you can with the data you have at the time and pray you are correct, it is why war is referred to as an art.
Where did Yamashita bury the loot
What about going around killing innocent farmers for no reason and than peeing on them ? Your army has been doing that on video and you can watch it I mean come on stop acting as if it's so difficult for y'all to kill the "wrong people" 😂
Good thing suicide bomber works that way, with the data they had, they prayed that they were correct. It is an art actually seeing blood splatter here and there. Hallelujah
Congrats on probably killing innocent people in a war you lost
Of cuz this is US terrorist drone
A pilot 2 miles in the sky looking at cameras and sensors isn't in any better position to gauge ethics of the activity on the ground than a guy in a box on us soil looking at cameras and sensors.
Its clear that insufficent intelligence gathering or the checks and balances of the aproval process that either pilot, remote or local, would have to go through isn't good enough. Being able to delete a person without any immediate risk should be something done cautiously and only with 100% guaranteed success.
best comment 👍🏼
Yeah that remark made no sense. Unless those pilots in the sky have eagle-eye vision!!
It's a lot more than 2 miles
@@donpayton737 oh.
02:16 that idiot really said cultural sensitivity. Does she think pilots who fly "fixed wing" planes knows culture of the enemy or cares about culture.
A Russian Su-27 did not collide with an MQ-9 over Syria, however a Su-27 did ram into a MQ-9 over the Black Sea, Russian Su-35s dumped flares on an MQ-9 in Syria but that's not what you meant, please try to be accurate in your reporting next time.
For anyone wondering the narrator says something at the end about A su-27 colliding with a MQ-9 over Syria where the footage from the MQ-9 being rammed over the Black Sea is shown.
hit the tail prop
Su-27 pissed on the reaper and melted one of its props.
Don’t matter it still got all the way in Syria without being spotted.
The furry being annoying and pedantic as always.
The thing I don't quite understand is: Why blame the *drone* for the civilian casualties? Even if it was a manned aircraft, the outcome would have been the same. It still would have looked like a threat, if the operator/pilot was in the aircraft or not, they're seeing the same thing.
Nothing screams threat quite like a wedding
I couldn’t agree more
Yes they may have seen the same thing but they are trained very differently and derfor are thinking very different about the decision making. You can’t ignore that the experience of being there in a cockpit sure is more intense and different than not being there many miles away.
@@normaluser4599 "wedding"
@@luffirton There isn't any intel or decision making difference between a manned or unmanned aircraft. The pilot sees the exact same thing. Many of the optical suites are even the exact same.
This is a lot like gun control. An AR-15 seems scary because the media tells you it is, but no one bats an eye at a 22lr handgun which historically has been used in way more murders than an AR-15.
It’s litterally called the “reaper” because it just comes to kill - doesn’t discriminate
Yemen dropped 12 from it 😅😅😅
Airforce: Pilots Wanted. Must have at least 5 yrs of Flight Simulator Gaming Experience! 😂
And a free ticket to eternal hellfires on judgement day.
Pretty sure these drone pilots are the best instrument-rated pilots in the world!
they aren't pilots as they are not in the aircrafts.
Nah
@@chltmdwp They're considered pilots. theyre physically controlling the plane through the GCS and have a sensor operator controlling the camera. Both are considered Pilot/Co-pilot in the MQ9. They both get their aviator wings just as any F-16/F-35 pilot would.
Correct, if you look at the pilot's HUD at 12:55 you can see his flight graphics are overlayed on top of what the targeting pod is looking at on the ground, not what is in front of them in the sky. This is how they fly 95% of the time. So although they may be flying in VFR conditions, they are still flying exclusively on instruments since the camera is pointed at the ground
Must be nice to be able to visit Cannon AFB, film for a little bit, and then get the hell out. My thoughts and prayers go out to the poor airmen stationed there.
Or holloman. New Mexico bases suck
lol
Well said
We appreciate your thoughts 😂
@@arsenals781 I was one of you until a month ago.
7:42 they always talk about fuzzy footage; but this is mostly classified military craft... meaning the footage we are seeing has been processed and stripped of quality and function. Anything you see is a factor of 10 worse than what the government actually sees. Why? Well for one thing, the government can't let their adversaries know actual capabilities or that could lead to enemies creating development goals based on those. So let's stop saying the "footage was blurry."
This is wrong, the military only data masks and selective editing of footage.
Yemen shot down 8 mq9 drones in a year😂
Yup 😂❤
and 3 alone this week 😀 ouch !
No Russia No China No Iran
but Yeman 💪💪
@@KINGOFHEAVENsb6xb shut up hating around
how much tax payer money is that? 32*8 = 256 Million
Let us get this straight... The drone pilots are not to blame whatsoever.. They are NOT the ones who decide to engage or not to engage.. They have a shot-caller that gets and gives clearances to fire... The pilots just do what they are told to do by the powers above...
Pretty much. They do have the final say in releasing the weapon as pilot in command, which basically means they can still refuse to release a weapon for any reason. Ultimately though the authority and main decision/clearance is received from up the chain after going through a whole vetting process. Pilots can deny any clearance given, but they can't independently clear themselves to engage a target if that makes sense.
They chose to do this. They're definitely to blame they're not being forced to sign up and be drone pilot
@@Itzskimpy Responsibility is shared across multiple authorities. Choosing to take a life is never one person's sole responsibility as I explained in my other reply. Sure, pilots choose to fly the aircraft, but they are not just bloodthirsty killers. It's a profession that's taken very seriously to avoid unnecessary noncombatant casualties to the max extent possible.
@@Itzskimpy This is probably the most ignorant comment I have ever read. Clearly you post comments before reading what you are replying to.
then get fired@@spaceladjack3105
My late uncle was an infantryman in the 96th Division on Okinawa and told my dad of an incident that should have killed him, but he survived. Uncle's company was spread out moving through some tall grass as they carefully looked for the enemy. My uncle said as he took a step, the soil felt spongy, and his step was immediately followed by a blast that threw him backwards. He was covered with blood and bits of tissue. Fellow soldiers rushed to him, thinking he was wounded. As it turned out, aside from ringing ears and being shaken up, he was whole and uninjured. What the soldiers found was a Japanese soldier in a camoflauged foxhole who apparently detonated a grenade under his chin, blowing off his head and helmet. As to why the fragments didn't hit my uncle, they figured the enemy's helmet and the material covering the foxhole deflected and absorbed some of the blast. My uncle survived the Battle of Okinawa and was one of the few men in his company who made it through without being wounded or killed. The fighting was so bad, the above story was the only battle incident he would discuss after the war with my dad, who was also a soldier.
Great story. Tough men. My grandmother remembers fondly the chewing gum and chocolate she got from a GI. A stark contrast to a group of German soldiers standing around the corpse of a young man laying in a pool of blood. We Europeans are eternally grateful.
how is this related to Reaper Drones
@@markusmeldre Because some reaper drone operators are conflicted and struggle with civilian life after killing people. The same way his uncle struggled after fighting the Japanese.
america can kill a coachroach from halfway across the world, but, cant find money for school bus drivers
Maybe because government shouldn’t be in education? Would you trust the state to make iPhones?🤷♂️
Or won't stop looters from looting super markets in plain day light
Dumbest reply. Trillions spent for military complex buddies and can't spare like .00000001% on its people is what he meant
Not the issue here! The real cockroaches are living large in America. Ppl are not a priority. Politicians are only concern about ppl when there’s an election. And ppl need to understand that. Which they haven’t!
Industrial Military Complex
While it's messed up and more should be done to prevent civilian deaths, how is a remote pilot any different than a guy sitting in a cockpit thousands of feet up?
Pilots are detached from the ground no mater what.
Maybe cause one is actually in the air, while the other is practically playing a video game
@@untasty4215 Modern cockpits are more video game like than ever. They're not looking down on people out of the window, they're looking at screens and graphical displays. They're getting almost the same view as a remote pilot. Neither of them are anywhere near the explosion.
Both of them are looking at computer screens and pressing a button. They're both nowhere near the explosion and they're far away from any possible retaliation.
I'm not defending bombing innocent civilians. I'm only saying that putting pilots in actual planes wouldn't change anything. They're both detached.
It's taking away the single only way of succeeding in fighting back from whoever's home towns are being decimated, if you're going to all but indiscriminately kill people then stick your leg out more than not at all, if you kill someone's friend, child or other family, be prepared to die as a consequence.
In this case, does matter that they're not in a manned aircraft. Most manned aircraft just get orders to boom and zoom on targets in a matter of hours. The MQ-9 crews can do that, but most of the time they observe targets for upwards of months before striking them. All-in-all it is much, much more personal for MQ-9 crews, hence the higher likelihood of PTSD than manned pilots, especially considering they can't talk to friends and family about classified flights even though they go home to "normal life" the same day unlike being deployed.
I grew up on playing Call of Duty back in the day and it doesn't compare at all. There's a difference between just playing a game and working a lethal profession.
Yeah, definitely seems more like the fault of intelligence rather than the fault of a drone pilot/fighter pilot.
Yemen just shot down an MQ9, it's the third one.
next video should be : How Yemeni Drone Pilots "land" The $32 Million MQ-9 Reaper
Broooo. Be careful, FBI might be searchibg for you 😂
Crazy part is they have downed 5 already.
One of these mq has been taken down in Yemen today. Total 7 mqs after October seventh
@coldzero9174 you're so lucky that UA-cam did not censor/delete your comment. I posted a similar comment which got deleted by UA-cam none-sense algorithm LOL
Drones are one of next level thing which mankind has discovered
Crazy part is they have been around since the 60’s
@@jimmyboe25 intresting
I see these flying above Fargo ND almost every single day while im working.
20 Years ago you used to see the Happy Hooligans occasionally flying their F-16's. When I transferred to NDSU I lived off-campus and parked at the Fargodome and remember hearing them when they would land or takeoff while I would be walking to class...It was unbearably loud sometimes.
I see a military video and automatically hear the narrators voice🤣 The guy has a badass voice for these videos
it doesn't matter if a pilot is in a fix wing craft. they are just pushing buttons and never have to see their targets up close and personal. if they want uo close and personal, have better digital image processing with better resolutions.
So says you from a comfy couch in your home.
In a way yes the pilots are just button pushers and have a minimal role in the decision to strike a target, but in this case it very much does matter that they're not in a manned aircraft. Most fixed-wing aircraft just get orders to boom and zoom on targets in a matter of hours. The MQ-9 crews can do that, but most of the time they observe targets for upwards of months before striking them. All-in-all it is much, much more personal for MQ-9 crews, hence the higher likelihood of PTSD than manned pilots.
@@spaceladjack3105 talk to the manned aircraft pilots and you’ll see it’s tough for them also
The greatest keyboard warrior ever
It’s the future!
As someone who is thinking about doing the Air Force, these videos are so interesting.
The vast majority of Air Force personnel do nothing like this. They're in support roles usually in jobs that correspond 1-to-1 with a civilian job.
@@kenlandon6130 a lot of NATO countries are hiring drone people these days
I find it funnier they have their name tapes pulled for anonymity, but their name is with their interview 💀
11 missed
Casual Opsec reminder boys
Yes, sir! Respec Opsec!
How on earth a man can sleep, and get back to home after killing 7 civilians people.
Children too! The propaganda machine is very powerful
Like this. 😴 🛌
Probably because he didn’t know that he killed children
Imagine just seeing "reconnecting" when you're flying it
It’s something we train for actually
@@brentsummers2676 Fancy seeing you here :)
@@brentsummers2676 Really is fancy seeing you here wow
Easley destroy by Yemeni forces
I was so close to getting this job on my ASVAB and was depressed because I wanted to protect people without putting myself in danger. I will try again when I get to the end of my mos contract
What branch are you in?
Irrespective of a drone or a physical fighter aircraft performing a sortie, the decision has already been made and the mode of execution does the alter the intended outcome however twisted and sinister or justified it might be. You are in the armed forces and the powers that be have spent a lot of money to make sure you have learnt to follow orders.
That's right, and as a remote pilot it is not just your decision to kill, it's the entire chain of command.
You get a special opportunity to do this very specializes work, don't cry about it after... You know who is plugging
up the VA system with patients, kids that volunteer to go into the military to perform a duty, then come home
and complain they have PTSD and receive a lifetime of disability because a bomb went off near them or they were shot at!
@@onazram1 The veteran's human guilt if any in America's so called shit storms around the world is at least addressed in their medical centres as taking lives can never be justified. Unfortunately nothing changes with the change of guard at the executive level of govt or in Capital Hill.
You sign up in the US armed forces to satisfy the agendas of the elite in US govt and Capital Hill. There was 1% inspiration and 99% corruption in the so called War on terror. It should actually have been called War of Terror.
Fortunately "to the best of my knowledge", India is no Pakistan for America to openly use armed drones.
That lady’s comment about sitting in a fixed wing aircraft was kinda weird. Why specify fixed wing (as opposed to rotary wing, aka helicopters)?
down by houthi with a 10k weapon, good exchange rate. apparently us dollar is still the strongest
Who’s here after Houthis shut down this 30 million drone 😂
Slingshot shoots 30M drone
😂but the drone collected information more valuable than 30 m$
See how complex it is to fly this drone , now imagine the people who built it
Who will be held accountable if they made a mistake and killed civilians?
me
Him
😅😂🤣
The pilot or mission commander just like any other aircraft.
no one, who cares
Good job yamen...
The ones the houthis are shooting it down every month 😂😂😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
I hear dis dude everywhere.
Fun fact: there is a legal function attached to the team that approves targets for termination.
Not sure why this video is skipping this vital piece of information. Those pilots have layers of approval prior to firing. None of them are firing "at-will".
@@mskettelhut because then some Congress man Or woman will have the bright idea to get involved. I think John Rizzo(CIAs chief legal officer for more than 20 years) stated that they deliberately omitted that info to avoid congress from probing too hard.
Correct.
The hellfire missile with the Multi-blade payload instead of an standard explosive 🧨 one is a breakthrough.
The fact they took off their nameplates tells a lot.
i mean would u want ur last name on display to a reporter and to youtube
"You can't just willy nilly cause civilian harm" Russian commanders: "hold my vodka blin, watch dis cyka!"
Russians may get flack for the Moscow Theater Crisis, but you go to hand it to them, they stopped domestic terrorism better than when Bill Clinton, Obama, and Biden gave terrorists billions of dollars in return for hostages and incentivize terror.
that destroyed many times by houties🤣🤣
Funny how an ad of Obama asking for donations popped up when watching this.
So having no pilots onboard allows to consult additional staff in the ground control unit. Cause they couldn‘t attach cameras to the drone, if there are pilots in the aircraft?
Can't wait to buy one. 😆
the guy who’s talking needs to do an f-150 commercial
“built ford tough”
“Cultural sensitivity and being embedded w a community “ lady wtf are you talking about. Our military is targeting the worst of the worst
These days the government finds more solidarity with terrorists than their own citizens or servicemen.
the new sat camera technology it so good reduces the need of these.
The MQ-9 Reaper drone has become a crucial part of modern warfare, with its portability and long-range capabilities allowing it to reach remote locations. However, the use of drones has also been controversial due to concerns about civilian casualties. In August 2022, the Pentagon finalized a civilian harm mitigation and response action plan to address this issue.
The MQ-9 Reaper is piloted from a ground control station, which can be located up to 1600 miles away from the drone. The drone's missions include gathering intelligence, surveillance, combat search and rescue, providing close air support, and precision strikes.
The Air Force has been operating remotely piloted aircraft for a couple of decades now, with the MQ-1 Predator being modified to fire missiles in 2001. The MQ-9 Reaper succeeded the Predator with advanced capabilities and longer endurance.
Drone pilots are trained to avoid harm to innocent civilians, with a process in place to ensure the correct target is identified and any collateral damage is accounted for. However, mistakes have occurred in the past due to the emotional distance between the pilot and the target.
The use of drones in modern warfare is a controversial topic due to concerns about civilian casualties. The Pentagon has developed a plan to address this issue, and drone pilots are trained to minimize harm to innocent civilians.
Did you have chat GPT write this?
@@waleededoo6134 UA-cam Summarizer
Yes, thank you, we watched the video.
Not me in the camera shot 🥴
1:12 "As US troops" *shows UK troops*
No😊
@@JH-xf3zr literally yes, those are Brits
Well done !
Yemen'in aslan adamları bu serçelerden kaç tanesini sapanla avladılar? 🤣
Wake up awful Troll, no drone in the world is unbeatable! But for sure the MQ-9 Reaper is the best in the world! What about the thousands drones Russia has lost in Ukraine.
@@emperorpalpatine7540 My friend, this is very embarrassing 2000$ drone take down 35 million dollars drone, and not just once, they did it 6 times
One of these just cruised my house bro. For an hour. Houston Texas. @1am to 2am 4.5.24 what the entire fawk
Imagine sitting at home and then boom, you're dead. Simply because some American soldier many miles from you thought you were a threat.
Another couch warmer making assertions for a person sitting in the real hot seat following orders
@@XX-166 That's not the point he's conveying, neither is he making an assertion, as he's presenting a hypothetical situation, which is justified by real-world instances of collateral damage. He's raising a point about the moral implications of drone operations, which you seem to interpret as an attack on the experience of the operators.
@@JustinRM20 you seem to assert that you’re a pro and have walked in the shoes of the drone operators. You have zero knowledge and there’s no need to be someone else’s public relations girl… they can speak for themselves.
@@XX-166 I'm surprised by your ability to discern whether I have knowledge on a subject by a UA-cam comment. I wish I had the power to dictate who replies to me (preferably only those who agree with me, those who don't have a Hellfire missile knocking on their roof).
@@JustinRM20 save your breath for your inflatable date as that’s no surprise to you goober.
Beginning voice 🔥🔥
I hope the Philippines will have a technology like this to stop china bullying and defend our territory..
Lets keep irrelevant news reporters out of this. These people are clueless
explain then since you're so well informed. What drone did you fly?
Looks like some soldiers might be able to work from home very soon.
Did you know the Iranian people call Qassem Soleimani "Kotlet" after he was killed by MQ-9 Reaper, Kotlet is an Iranian food, simliar to a hamburger that is made with meat and potato, after Soleimani was killed, the term became popular among the Iranian people, that's how much the Iranian people despise the regime and it's people.
War has truly come a long way since WWII. 80 years ago, we could accept 250k ppl dying in one battle. Now the numbers are far, far less. I couldn't imagine the mindsets of the soldiers in that time.
How yemen forces take down?
Very Dangerous MQ-9 Reaper Drone.
that Drone has killed more civilians than soldiers
Says you from your mommies warm couch
"Hahahahaha... Lemme stop by the bank." - Raytheon, 2023
Who came here after this drone was destroyed by Houthis?!!
There is no difference between a conventional pilot and a drone pilot killing people. It's all about the training to avoid 3rd party casualties!
Shout out to LtCol Hill! Loved workin for him!
😂 Yemen is taking down one drone a month! 😅
Three, actually.
No big deal 2-3 drones are almost nothing. What about the thousands drones, fighting jets, helicopters etc Russia has lost in Ukraine 😂
8 😂@@emperorpalpatine7540
Update 6@@kEINZDA
reconnaissance: Keşif
Drone pilots are seeing the same thing a regular pilot would see. There's little difference.
It is brazen of them to admit they killed a military officer of another nation by the drone. Who will held somebody accountable killing someone without due process?
They can pilot them from much further away than 1600 miles. The drones in the Middle East are piloted from Nevada. Get your info correct 😮
😂 Yemenis destroyed your 30 million dollar drone
replaceable
Hey Billy, replaceable but can't replace the embarrassing reputation of a multi million dollar drone brought down by a bunch of medeival sand dwellers.
We allowed it 😂
Not as glamorous, but it’s the replacement of the A10 Warthog
Make a video about the military's suicide drones!
Some chick walked in to the propeller of one of those drones while testing it.
0:19: ⚠ The MQ-9 Reaper drone has revolutionized modern warfare, but concerns about civilian casualties and mistakes made by remote pilots have overshadowed its effectiveness.
3:37: ✈ The MQ-9 Reaper is an unmanned aircraft known for its persistence and ability to loiter for long periods of time.
6:41: ✈ The MQ-9 Reaper is an unmanned aircraft equipped with advanced sensors and capable of carrying laser-guided missiles.
9:29: ✈ The Air Force's ground control station allows for additional personnel to assist in missions, such as doctors or survival experts.
12:19: ✈ The video discusses the use of drones in military operations and the importance of precision and accuracy in targeting.
14:44: ✈ The MQ-9 Reaper drone plays a vital role in military operations, but its pilots face emotional burdens and the need for continuous training to minimize civilian casualties.
Recap by Tammy AI
stupid ass recap
Yemen: hello
I just came here after the Houthis downed the 6th of this sorry a$$ drone lol
You cant rely on technology forever, unless combined with real ground level intel
Ukraine doing serious damage with simple retail drones.
""Enemy UAV in the area"
😂Yemen's Houthis shot down another American MQ-9 Reaper attack UAV worth more than $10 million.
Then they waited for an official statement from the Pentagon, which stated that “the drone fell due to a technical malfunction” and only after that they published a video of how they shot down an MQ-9 Reaper, catching the Americans in yet another lie)))
It's easy to humiliate Americans when the truth is on your side)))
DJI already took notes and upgraded lol
😂This is not true, because Yemen was able to shoot down six aircraft of this type with ease. You say it is advanced, but in reality it is just a game for the Yemeni army 😂😂
Providing freedom to resourceful countries
If I ever join the military I’m going be a drone pilot, less dangerous and less PTSD from what I’ve heard, due to desensitization from frankly videogames.
Or you know, you could do a job that doesn't involve killing people...
It is less dangerous for the pilot and sensor operators yes, but statistically a much greater likelihood of PTSD due to the amount of targets you prosecute, the length of time at which you prosecute them (sometimes upwards of a few months looking at one person), and the fact that most operations are classified that you can't tell family or friends about even though you go back to "normal life" the same day unlike being deployed.
I grew up on playing Call of Duty back in the day and it doesn't compare at all. There's a difference between just playing a game and working a lethal profession.
Do you think the Russian or Chinese having this technology would give a shit?
This lady talking about innocent people being killed in a war zone...You shouldn't be in a place that's dangerous in the first place.