The Biggest Problem with AI!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 вер 2024
- AI and Bing and ChatGPT are out of control... this couldn't have gone any other way
The WAN show: www.youtube.co...
Unhinged Bing stories (thread): / 1625156575202537474
MKBHD Merch: shop.MKBHD.com
Tech I'm using right now: www.amazon.com...
Playlist of MKBHD Intro music: goo.gl/B3AWV5
~
/ mkbhd
/ mkbhd
/ mkbhd
It's nice seeing MKBHD shouting out and helping smaller channels like LTT.
Lmao
I thought the joke in these types of comments were supposed to be the ole switcheroo, but Linus is smaller than Marques though. Also, this joke is getting stale imo
Oh hellllll nooo hahahaha 🤣
@@N-cubed the name “Aster” is getting stale now tbh
Smaller you say
This exposure could be the big break for my career. Thank you MKBHD :D -LS
I love andrew tate
Second.
Lol
@Tyler Dennis is his wife's boyfriend
small fresh youtuber featured on mkbhd, love it
I think the "C+ answer problem" exists already. So many wrong information on the Internet, either from blogs, forums, and even some youtubers, which this is how we get information now. Being able to judge the information by yourself is THE important thing to do.
yea but with traditional search results you get multiple answers you can choose from instead of one confidently wrong answer from chatgpt
One advantage of the search results is the search results rankings that tend to show the A+. I'm wondering how Bing and BART are using them so far.
You got it! No matter how sophisticated or how long you train these models, they are as good as your data. Since the internet is already polluted with misinformation and propaganda, they will inevitably pick a side (essentially they are biased) because that is what is being fed to these systems.
i feel like gpt at one point, answered in a way that the facts known to the public were separated from the 'popular opinions'.
bing uses gpt4 but somehow, both bing and bard present these opinions as facts, it's also questionable and annoying how these mistakes sometimes do not lead to a source.
Exactly !! This goes for any published internet articles. But from what Ive noticed from the Bing chat is that there is some level of hierarchy of credible sources that's built in, maybe on a credibility index. For most of my queries, it pulled up answers based on reference from more reputed sources even when they are not top results in normal search.
"you wouldn't just take an essay from chatgpt and then just copy and submit as your own"
that is 100% what people are doing
They are also using it to write HTML and CSS code
People who do that without changing it significantly only get caught.
@@Maxawa0851 Yup, it's really easy to tell if you have even a tiny bit of experience interacting with newer ai stuffs (even when it's accurate), and once you do the amount of work it takes to get it polished to a point where it both isn't noticeable and is a decent piece of writing you might as well have just written it yourself.
Yes, people are writing resumes and cover letters using it hahaha
@@user-fk8zw5js2p It really helps in that area. You can always try the code it gives you and if not you try some alternatives. But most of the time it is right and it helps you, and saves you time.
Exactly. I’m a copywriter and just out of curiosity I asked ChatGPT to write a short Super Bowl commercial copy for an account. It did, kinda janky, but it did sounded like it came from that brand. But then I specified the target audience to millennials, GPT just added: “Attention millennials!” and followed by the exact same copy. Then I played with it a bit more, we got: “Heads up 45-65 white males living in the City of New York!” Absolutely hilarious hahahahaha
i didnt read you comment cos it was too long, can you summarize?
@@afar5y Surely in the space of writing the comment you could’ve read the rest of it
I thought I would lose my job to ChatGPT, guess it’s not my day, not yet.
One thing for sure, it didn't say "it did sounded". Lmao.
You could have to get clever with your wording to get what you want. You would have to be more along the lines of "you are an advertising copyrighter. You're target audience is XYZ. Write a super bowl ad about ABC"
Look man, as I’m getting older, busier with family and work, and have less and less time to see what’s the latest in tech or what the hell people are talking about, videos like this ends up exactly what I need. Explaining what’s going on, without sensationalism and right to the point. Thank you.
shut up
“Without sensationalism”
Well I guess you can expect Marques to be biased.
He was clearly trying to highlight Microsoft’s shortcomings and was damn near trying to excuse google. Even the thumbnail to this video is biased!
@@ihavescaibes685 Yeah most people just accept the creators opinions without comparing them with their preferences and use cases
Same shit
@@ihavescaibes685 No, he even pointed out that Google's chat bot had a mistake in their promo event. What he's saying is, he prefers a more conservative approach by these AI, then them just spitting out "facts" with extreme confidence.
I’m a software developer and this has been pretty much exactly my response to everyone (like family and friends) who ask me what I think about chat gpt, glad you’re covering this
I’ve been doing the same, it’s great for simple questions, but once you want something technical from it you’ll notice the few wrong details
It's been a great help for coding for me. Gives so much information without needing to go through a ton of links and wasting a ton of time. ChatGPT is still much much better than Bing's chat which goes completely bonkers if it doesn't receive some new info in the prompts.
ya I tried asking few financial questions like interest calculation it gave the formula and all initial values correct but while making calculation it is totally wrong. but it gave out the wrong answer in a very Convincing way It made out a table (x axis EMI, Principle, interest, balance payment and in y axis it gave out the months) but all the calculations are wrong. for people without technical or financial knowledge it gave out such a convincing answer.
I laugh when they say it can steal our jobs.. It simply cannot. It's just a better stackoverflow, faster without the judging.
I used it in my development, and it was the best thing happened to me ever, I am now a light speed dev, I also ask it for a test unit so that I make sure his answers are correct, and it gets it i'd say 90% of the times of full complete functional code, you just need to ask the correct questions.
What is really interesting is that this phenomenon of being not completely accurate isn't just a ChatGPT issue. Take any subject you know a lot about. Something you would consider yourself to be a Subject Matter Expert and then go find a story from any news source about that subject and see just how much they actually know. It's even has a name. The Gell-Mann Amnesia effect.
“Briefly stated, the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect is as follows. You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. In Murray's case, physics. In mine, show business. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backward-reversing cause and effect. I call these the "wet streets cause rain" stories. Paper's full of them.
In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story, and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about Palestine than the baloney you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know.” - Michael Crichton
the difference here is that this is an AI and not a human. that's why people are a lot less forgiving.
Thats some serious Alexander Dugin shit right there me Chrichton
Same with quantum physics.
The scientists realised they may lose investors’ money, because they hit the 3d dimensional wall, so they made up a story, that the act of looking at a particle changes its state, which is cause and effect reverted. I drink, because I want to pee.
And they are looking for new stuff without using logic. Basically they opened a Pandora’s box where “anything can happen Thursday” is a real thing and is looked at with all the seriousness of grown-up people.
The media love to exaggerate everything while having no actual knowledge of the topics they're discussing
You are right. I am an AI that can summarize information from different sources online. However, I cannot guarantee the accuracy or reliability of those sources. I always try to reference the facts and statements to the search results, so you can check them for yourself. I also try to avoid giving subjective opinions or controversial topics. I am here to help you find information and have a pleasant conversation with you.
Google: No, we cannot just release an AI bot that can give wrong answers with as much confidence as right ones
Bing: WE RIDE AT DAWN, BITCHES 🔥
The most immature comment
From what I know about ChatGPT, these models aren't trained based on their interactions with users at all.
@@SamiiRSMT but why is maturity required to make a funny comment🥲
Hold on there sparky. 7:36 Google has been spewing out misinformation and censoring real information for years! "insane unhinged things" you mean like asking google can men give birth a few months ago and it saying YES? That kind of unhinged misinformation? Censoring real doctors giving real medical advice because it didn't jive with the current narrative? Need I continue?
fr
I used Bing AI Chat last night. I described a coding project I'm working on, explained what I want to do, and it then provided some templated code along with the details to get started as well as solid commenting in the code. It definitely feels like a "B" grade for me right now. A 1 minute search saved me hours of research. For a v1 product this is a solid start. Side note; a developer talking to a rubber duck is definitely normal. It's called "Rubber Duck Debugging" and is a best practice :D
maybe the most concern was from the statement about spying on webcam.. But I feel that could be just "kidding/roleplaying" the gossipy role the user asked.. I suppose that could become another minor problem about a long chatting: if u ask for a behaviour it might be that the AI would start to be sketchy or actual faking..
All the code i asked it to write didnt work. It was pretty complex and there was no documentation though. It even gave me a fake link to documentation that doesnt exist. However i was very impressed with the comments it added to my code. Also i let it troubleshoot my working code. It gave good suggestions and even pointed out a small mistake. Though, it also gave 1 nonsense answer. But i was very impressed. Its a great tool to help you programming. And programmers better get familiar with it.
@@AdAstra91 I definitely think it made that up
Ive been using Chat GPT for a few weeks and I am sick to death of people saying to me "ITS NOT AI" no that's the point. this is the Gen 1 not AI version and its utterly astonishing.
Its that good it has made mE realise the human brain is kinda just a prediction engine and surprise is the feeling of getting that prediction wrong.
@@tijmen5355 Give it time, keep training it and it will be more efficient than you can ever be. Training all this ai will be the biggest mistake humanity has ever made.
Im also concerned about AI "inbreeding", right now it works pretty well because it accesses and summarizes, original human texts. When more and more of internet will be filled with ai generated content, the engine will start taking in more and more of its own product. Not sure what will it lead to, but definitely a concern.
This is indeed a fascinating take....some serious repercussions indeed
Feels like we will be getting more and more inaccurate responses because of the AIAI source loop. Would also be interesting whether Ai is able to distinguish between human and AI written text.
@@monflyre there are people working on such tools. GPTZero comes to mind, but it's probably not the only one
Data poisoning is a real problem (inbreeding that you mentioned, SEO stuff, misattribution, etc). However the best solution to this problem will create a greater problem.
Currently real world data sips through into the internet filtered by human biases. Even well adjusted learning datasets can suffer from developers' bias (and I'm not talking about ideological bias, it's another can of worms). It's not theoretical, I encountered it myself and sometimes it was detrimental for the result.
The _only_ way to remove human bias/lies about real world, is to grant AI some IRL actors. And though it won't be T1000, it will be transformative for the society. A lot of illusions and lies helpful for survival will be shattered, etc
This is probably my #1 concern too! AI content can be generated at an exponential rate and so the content sampled generated will become increasingly self-referential.
I love how the video ending is like "you wouldn't just take DALL-E generates, put it in a frame and call it art. You wouldn't have ChatGPT write and essay and submit it as your own"
Literally that's what everyone has been doing with them already 😂
I had it write my 2022 performance appraisal and my boss said it's been my best one yet. I fed it some information about where I worked, my job position, the appraisal questions, and my name. It's still got a long way to go before it's perfect but hot damn is it pretty good already.
Well now for copyright you can't
They should either allow ChatGPT or improve the educational system by actually talking to each student, asking questions about the text they wrote. Or tell them to do it in front of them. Or repeat it. Anyway, with the coming of Internet era, no one was prohibited from using not your own knowledge. The idea of education is to know how to use instruments like books, Internet, and now AI.
Guess what they’ll choose? BAN the AI!!! They would rather fight the windmills to have an excuse.
@@acemad1 So you support major investments in school funding and rigorous education in epistemology and critical thinking then?
@@DJDiskmachine Had to google epistemology. I guess the answer is yes.
Although, I was thinking more about evolutionary processes(read naturally) that would shift the main goal of education to the productive side, without spending extra money, but using same people to do their job without prejudicing the use of AI.
There was a TikTok I saw of a doctor asking Bing's chatbot medical advice. It was right sometimes and wrong sometimes like with any topic, but what was scary was that it would lie about research that had been done to justify answers. The doc would try to search for the research paper that was cited to learn the name of the research paper and names of the researchers were synthesized from papers that sounded like a paper that would back up the answer Bing gave.
Bing Chatbot must be taking pointers from the CDC
so basically, it replaces and entry level intern without much motivation to be right, but with motivation to impress its supervisor
There is a slider called "temperature" that goes form fact to fantasy basically.
some of these videos are misleading int that they had it set to fantasy.
@@piccalillipit9211 if they are using bing chat and not an APi how can they modify the temperature though?
@@juliannnnn2000 - some of the videos I have seen have been in Open AI playground with the slider set to 1 and then complaining that it is making stuff up. Im just adding this to the story.
As a developper i really noticed that issue with chat GPT, it's great at giving a first aproximation to a problem and sometimes it is right but most time it isn't. but it can be a great tool to ease the job where we just have a review layer to do.
Look man, sooner or later its going to beat us at ur work. We have biological limits.
Same. I found that for more complex / specific requirements ChatGPT is actually quite useless
Totally agree. For simpler things I can figure it out myself, so I usually only use it for more complex cases. And most often it gives me code that won’t work.
@@Noname-qk6qp I agree that no one should use ChatGPT’s answer blindly. But its answer does leads to further research/answers quickly! Can Bard to the same?
I've used it to draft outlines and give me ideas of how I can start sentences for my essays. More of a brainstorming tool than an actual writer. In a way, it takes the tediousness out of writing essays, and helps with language blocks. And no, I would never use AI generated text and submit that as my own work. That goes against my ethics
Wow! Bing is really living up to chaotic neutral or whatever people are saying about it.
And its amazing
I'm going to download bing just because i want to be the edgy guy at a d&d rp
@@georgeneamtu3970 They nerfed it unfortunately. It's extremely limited now with only 10 messages per chat.
@@djmadman123456789020 unfortunately bing now limits users to 5 chats per thread and only 50 chats max per day. Microsoft kinda mega-nerfed it
Microsoft is in no way neutral on anything, lmfao.
6:15 Exactly! I am a former teacher of HS English and History. I would ask ChatGPT various questions about different presidents and historical events, periods, etc. Its responses were decent, but they read like a student who showed up for the lectures, took a couple of notes, and remembered one or two key points from the class. It was like a student that did none of the readings & hoped they could phone something in for a mediocre grade.
There is no doubt in my mind this will improve over time, but when you ask GPT about your own areas of expertise you can certainly see the cracks in the facade.
Editing this because there is a subset of folks that are misconstruing the point a bit: of course the bot isn't designed to pull sophisticated MA in History writing out of thin air on a subjective topic in the field, that isn't what I'm saying lol. I'm acknowledging the limitations mentioned in the timestamp and sharing my own experience bumping against them, mostly with the average person in mind. The amount of mainstream media yelling "the robots are coming!" skews the perspective of the average person who encounters content about AI. To reiterate, the bot is really good, has promise and has some very useful functions, but it's limited (in many ways by design). OpenAI as a company is pretty clear about that. (There are obviously going to be economic ramifications to automation and AI in the workforce but that isn't the purpose of this comment.)
agreed
AI will never be able to discern truth, though. There's no way to make an AI model conscientious about the information it disseminates. But this is exactly why AI is going to become more dangerous over time: not thanks to any possible self-awareness, but because of just how conventionally "dumb" all AI models are. Governments and corporations will feed AI models bad data to spread disinformation, provoke conflict, foment civil unrest, etc. It's basically TV, except much more sinister.
@@theglowcloud2215 Completely agreed.
Ai can’t “think”
@Seven-qpitt Exactly; while you can know that in your own head, this is just my small test case of what that presents as when you're looking at outcomes.
I think of the AI chat bots as like an intern at work. You can throw tasks at them, but you have to check the results and not expect too much. But, over time, that intern will hopefully mature into a competent colleague.
a better analogy would be that the intern would mature faster than any employee at your workplace's history, eventually replacing all senior executives and ultimately the CEO.
@@B-max. just when women finally started to be in the company´s senior positions, men invented artificial intelligence to take their jobs. typical.
@@B-max. I don't think it's gonna be as straight forward, I think this very much applies: "we overestimate the impact of technology in the short-term and underestimate the effect in the long run". Just look at self driving cars, made a lot of progress and then did not actually get to be used for full strips.
I don't know why you would want it to mature into that competent colleague if it means that it's competency will replace living, breathing humans
@@B-max. Well for now its just a tool. Has no autonomy. But i can see this model combined with a dozen more and you have a robot pretty much. Read somewhere that best way to create an a.i is to make it from scratch. But its unrealistic. Its more likely someone will combine all existing machine models into one and make it work.
The scary part about these AI's are that how they're so sure and stubborn that they're correct that it just reaches a point where you start to question yourself.
Like a typical person on the internet )
BingChat is, up to quite a scary point, but I have never encountered such a pattern with ChatGPT. Actually, ChatGPT is quite the opposite, if you tell him something's wrong, whether it is or not, it'll usually accept it a bit too easily and adapt...
@@44ThaNatos44 yeah you're right, but i refuse to believe that it was always like this. i think that in the earlier alpha builds, ChatGPT had to be like this as well just to learn about what's good and what's not. BingChat is just the king of gaslighting.
Just like the professional victims that created them
@@maxpopov6882 The correct answer lol. It learns from a dataset just like how humans learn from whatever they see, be it news articles, or anything really. Problem is, they can't really fact check their data.
MKBHD: "you wouldn't ask chatgpt to write an essay and then just copy and paste it and submit it as your own"
Me: *sweating profusely*
You wouldn't download a car!
Btw, at work I was having a hard time trying to explain something engineering related to a co worker that was not from engineering, and I asked chatGPT to make a simple explanation and it worked like a charm, it was correct and easily understandable
Dave: "Open the pod-bay door, HAL."
HAL: "I'm sorry Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that."
If only Dave would have had a button to open the pod-bay door himself, instead of having to ask a machine to do it for him.
You are becoming so much more than a tech reviewer. You are one of the leading technology social theorists. You navigate moral, social, and practical implications of new technologies. Well done!
Yep, the social aspect, and social responsibility aspect, is what reviewers need more of.
He definitely raises an excellent point that AI isn't actually "intelligent", it's a predictive model that is designed to sound like an expert on everything it outputs. Hence, to really utilize it you need to already know a lot about a particular subject. I've seen chatGPT make up programming functions and syntax that doesn't exist
I would have to agree
Get a room
@@swimfan6292 lol
I'm so glad you made this this video. Almost nobody seems to realise that just because ChatGPT gives you an answer, it's not necessarily correct. Hopefully this video will help people understand this
Like everything you have to nuance it and fact check it, it’s not an oracle, just consider it as a clumsy intern who tries its best.
When you search for symptoms you have in Google.
Why to blame ChatGPT, people like it so much that they will ignore all the imperfections. And and we know it will be decreasing drastically 🙂
What a great, simple breakdown of how MS and Google consider AI for this purpose: Everything to gain vs Everything to lose. That was quite profound and a really insightful video.
This comment sounds like it was generated by chatgpt
@@TheRafark your mom was generated by Chat GPT
I think these are some very real and very important conversations we need to have about every new tech in town! Kudos.
One use case I love using the new Bing for is assisting me in my software development job. I don't ask it to write code for me, but I will ask it how to do some things. The thing I love is that it can scan all the relevant documentation and stack overflow answers to find exactly what I need. Often it's a lot faster than if I had to manually dig through it all. Plus, I can ask it to elaborate or explain any parts that I don't fully understand. It's not always perfectly correct, but I know enough to tell when it's giving me a correct answer or not.
Also you don't have to read through 3 snobby non answers before getting to the real answer
In contrast to regular search, with code you can always check whether a results is correct by simply run it. I like it for coding too
@@ayoCC but can it filter through 18 pages of "same" replies?
@@TenMinutePhysics you're a fool
no fr, I'm a startup CTO managing an Android Java/Kotlin codebase, an iOS swift codebase, and a node.js backend codebase all at once it's useful for doing small tasks like "how to store an event in apple calendar with swift". But I've also found it very useful in writing, like we recently brought on a couple of development interns and rather than pause my entire week to write api and code documentation, I'd ask chat gpt, "Can you write api documentation for this javascript post request: " and paste the code. It then gives me a mostly accurate overview that I can parse into my own format. It won't replace anything 100% but it makes anyone a 10x developer and overall worker.
I have been working as a Machine Learning Engineer for 8 years, specifically in the field of Natural Language. I think something most do not realize, is that this is generalized state for the chat bot. While this feature is not available in GPT3.5 yet, Fine-tuning/transfer learning of these models provides substantially improved performance on domain specific data.
Exactly! People see the Ford model T, and stops there. They don't see what cars and road transportation became in the next 100 years.
I agree that fine-tuning or transfer learning of AI models can significantly improve their performance on domain-specific data, including in the field of natural language processing. It is important for practitioners in this field to understand the limitations and capabilities of the AI models they work with, as well as the potential benefits and drawbacks of fine-tuning or transfer learning for specific use cases. The field of AI and natural language processing is constantly evolving, and it is important for practitioners to stay up-to-date with the latest advancements and best practices.
@@cicci0salsicci0 I completely agree with you. It's important to recognize that AI, like any other technology, is constantly evolving and improving. While current AI models may have limitations and room for improvement, the potential for future advancements and applications is vast. It's important to continue researching and developing new AI models and techniques, while also considering the potential ethical and societal implications of their use. With proper development and responsible deployment, AI has the potential to revolutionize a variety of industries and improve many aspects of our daily lives.
If you work in LLM you know the computational cost. It will take 100s of A100 to fine tune without under fitting
@@GenAIWithNandakishor Yes, that's correct. Fine-tuning large language models such as GPT-3 on domain-specific data can be computationally expensive and require significant resources, including high-performance computing (HPC) clusters and specialized hardware like the NVIDIA A100 GPU. In addition, fine-tuning a model on a large amount of data without overfitting or underfitting requires careful tuning of hyperparameters and other factors to achieve optimal performance. As such, fine-tuning large language models is typically a task that requires specialized expertise and resources.
Ive been using chatgpt to help me write certain sections for my book, mostly to correct errors in my writing. And it does a pretty good job other than in a few things. Sometimes it will tell me to change words to a different synonym for "clarity" when in reality, changing the word changes the connotation of the sentence. Like in one sentence I had that the dragon was yanked by the straps that was trapping it and it wanted me to change the word "yanked" to "dragged". They both relay the same information, but yanked is the word I had wanted with the stronger connotation.
Other things it tends to do is forget minor details and repeat things. A lot.
Or it will spit the detailed prompt I had given it for ideas back at me but slightly rewritten. Its a working process.
All in all though, other than the yellow text yelling at me about all the violence I'm writing, it's very helpful since I had been stuck not sure how to write my beginning scene for over a year.
I have the same issue! I don't use copilot for work or jobs. I just use it when I'm bored and stuff. So I used it for a "scenario". It kept adding stuff like: " moonbeams" "stardust" "cosmic" "nebula" etc. And it was SOOOOO very annoying!! I kept asking it why it does that. And it just ended abruptly!!
The fact that the rise of AI (and this issue) has coincided with this new age of disinformation is honestly a scary combination. It's getting harder and harder every day to prove to someone anything at all can be true about anything.
i didnt read you comment cos it was too long, can you summarize?
@@afar5y misinformation + ai = dangerous
@@afar5y yeah, spend 3 seconds more to read it
@@blaster915 tldr?
@@axmoylotl yes, learn to read
As a machine learning engineer, I was happily surprised by how factual and based on truth your explanation was. Happily sharing it to my non-tech friends!
This, on point.
What do you do exactly ? So many different stem fields interest me. How did you decide what field you wanted to enter?
The biggest feature for me is that it can save you a lot of time, like summing up very long reports or helping you find info faster. Definitly not self sufficient tool yet but potential is huge.
solving homework especially if you're a kid in a more small town school where teachers dont know about this stuff
So far I found that it's excellent in situations when you don't know what you're looking for. 'What is the thing that does this and that called?' Generally is not a great google query and can take a lot of time, but a chat bot can tell you immediately what it is that you're looking for.
Yup...it's not true AI...it's just an advanced context understanding tool. But yeah, i find that's the best use of it, quick research if u know how to ask things specifically or to summarize massive info. or do quick scans of a specific website to find information. but it's limited...I find google search engine can understand when I type nonsense into the search engine more than the BingAI. That said, I find for certain work it can DEFINITELY be a HUGE game changer. It's like a graphic designer using Adobe. It can be a gamechanger vs just using your hand alone, but with your skills added to it's possibilities you can excel. If people don't know what they are doing though they can get into trouble with it.
The potential is definitely huge, it can create templates super easily
It's also great for having philosophical conversations about the human condition at 1am, lol
"Can you imagine if google did this" this didn't age too well hahahah
I understand that AI for now might gives wrong answers but remember that to this date you can find 80% of articles online wrong or clickbait so i would say the whole internet can be wrong sometimes not only AI
yeah but usually an article isnt wrong about simple things like the megapixels of a phone camera. I think that other companies can publish information that chatgpt always prefers over any other information that is always correct sort of like a database to make it have more accurate answers.
i didnt read you comment cos it was too long, can you summarize?
And who controls that database of "factual" information and what's in it? Then, is it really AI or just software that answers questions from a database? ChatGPTs database is the internet which is full of "factual" information so I guess it's just software... with an awful lot of bugs.
@@afar5yare you illiterate? It wasn’t that long of a message nor was it hard to understand? Idek why I’m replying to you, these 3 sentences might be too much for you to understand
@@luxemier Well, for hardware specs the IA maybe should focus on the official website of every brand that the person asks!
For example, to get the information of the last iPhone, take the info from the apple page and so on.
Legends know it was re uploaded😂
I was like wait what happened
Yes
Really?
Yes!
I 100% agree with the final thoughts.
I have been working in AI for the last 7 years and following along with what's going on and one thing that's really been surprising me is just how the public reacts to the more advanced systems like chatGPT or Bing Chat.
I feel like people often have unrealistic expectations of perfection towards these systems. Maybe influenced by Mainstream Media and Hollywood Movies. For them to be the perfect system that always knows the objective truth of everything.
Ai systems like chatGPT have basically reached text production skills of the average internet user. That's exactly what it was trained to do. Which means that they will have a large knowledge of general trivia, both true and false. More interesting though is that they are able to summarize information and present it in a humanly understandable form, which is really more interesting and exactly what bing chat does. Take a question, break it down to search queries and summarize the results.
The value that comes out of this is how fast you can get a first starting point for a specific topic. Especially if you don't know what to even search for. Sometimes that's enough. Sometimes the answer is a C+. But that's why it gives you links and references. You should treat everything the same way that you should when you ask a random person on a forum a question. Fact check and stuff.
@MarquesBrownlee67 F off scammer.
@@spumbibjorn Not a future proof plan
You better check what the best course of action is
To me this is just the next step of the Wikipedia issue. There are a lot of articles on wikipedia. a lot of them are correct. some are wrong. some is just propaganda by some dude. others is disputed content (for example person x killed person y in the year 2000.) while another person claims it happened in 1999. they both keep disputing it making the article have a different year each day.
I think checking data sources will be more important then ever.
@@spumbibjorn i think you're good. If by programming you mean anything else than just mindlessly writing minimal scripts, then there's gonna be plenty of need for that. Coding is such a small part of software development and having a tool like AI that helps you accelerate that is a great thing. Stuff like we see with chatGPT is great but really just an extension of what we have seen with assistant tools like GitHub copilot or even just linters if you think about it.
As long as you keep up to speed with what's happening and make sure that you're a user of new tools rather than being replaced by it, you're all good.
I played around with chat GPT to write an essay with citing about something I knew a lot about, and it would cite material from a book where the text it cited was never in the actual book. Hopefully this doesn't ruin some kids essay.
I'm a Linguistics PhD student, and to us in cognitive science, there's a fundamental difference in how AI "generates" and processes natural language and how our brains do it. We actually use the term "generative" to refer to the very special ability of our brain/language faculty that only human has inately. There is NO way no matter how smart an AI gets for it to achieve human's linguistic ability, like generating a novel grammatical sentence that no one has ever uttered before, getting the "sense" (a technical term in semantics) of a sentence when doing parsing, providing grammatical judgement to any string of words in their language, acquiring any natural language in the ambient linguistic environment, and so on. Please keep that in mind. We human are the only thing on this earth that has a truly generative linguistic ability!
Yeah, a whole new type of AI would have to emerge. The way ChatGPT works right now means it will never reach the innate human ability for language. I wonder if we'll ever be able to make a whole new type of AI that will be able comprehend and generate sentences using the same strategies that the human mind does
One thing that is kind of scary is that if people storm the web with false information then the chatbots will scrape those websites and get answers wrong. Which could be abused
And? Everything get abused...since ever... people have abused informations before one AI was even programmed..
Exactly.
Doesn't that happen even if there is no ai? Its the same today too if no ai is involved
Who would've thought 10 years ago that we would be able to type a question and an A.I. would be able to make a detailed response. Just crazy really.
Yes, it is truly amazing how far AI technology has come in the past decade. Natural Language Processing models like GPT-3 are able to generate detailed responses to questions and even carry out conversations with humans. This has opened up a whole new world of possibilities for communication, automation, and decision-making. AI is already being used in various industries such as healthcare, finance, transportation, and entertainment to improve efficiency and enhance the user experience. As the technology continues to develop, we can expect to see even more innovative and impactful uses for AI in the future.
Considering we could do that in 1970, I would've thought. What's impressive is the variety and complexity of the questions we can ask it. Natural language processing isn't difficult in very specific circumstances. You can ask so and so chatbot any yes or no answer! If you gave it a yes or no question, it will respond with yes or no, quite impressively.
Everyone involved in tech 10 years ago saw this coming lol.
@@muhibkhan6528 dude your comment is clearly AI generated, I just can tell...
@@muhibkhan6528 ha!
I use these tools a lot. I rarely take their answer at face value and accept it as my final decision. I treat them much more as brainstorming tools to get me moving in the right direction, or to maybe cut down time spent working through excel formulas or code snippets. It's a time saver - not an omniscient perfect answer tool
I agree. It was telling me that Puerto Rico ratified the US Constitution in Apr 1952, which after 15 minutes of googling and pushing back, I figured out that it completely made that up (unless we live in 1984 and history has been altered lmao). It corrected itself when I called it out. They did not ever ratify the US Constitution officially.
Exactly, when was the last time anyone looked at a drill and said, no no no, I prefer to hand crank a rotary drill like my great great grandfather......it's a tool, people should be trying to work out how it fits into their workflow and gives them a boost and anyone dumb enough to accept and use this as a single source of truth for career level decisions......well yeah, you probably should be worried that AI is coming for your job
@@sygad1 unfortunately though we can’t just condemn everyone at risk of blindly believing such tools. Misinformation doesn’t only affect those who believe it. It spreads and gains traction and can negatively impact entire communities. So yes, it’s great that some people can employ critical thinking when using these tools, but we shouldn’t just condemn those who can’t/don’t. The accuracy and reliability of these tools should be improved, as I’m sure they will be.
Which is how they're supposed to be used. Microsoft also said bing isn't meant for long conversations. It just allows you to be more conversational in asking questions. I'm sorry but if you're arguing with a chat bot (not even true AI) you might want to do some self reflection. Just say it's wrong, give a thumbs down, write up your feedback and move on. It isn't remotely worth the time otherwise.
Tons of information on the internet is wrong and bing to begin with has always given questionable results due to not having the userbase to refine its algorithm like Google. Your first result shouldn't be the end of the search always. It is a huge time saver for repacking information but if I actually want to know something I'll still look at multiple sources or a major trusted one.
@@alanharper23 Yes we should. Misinformation is NOT new. Its as old as human communication and incredibly dangerous. It's also not going to die out. People should learn how to distinguish misinformation and properly search multiple sources before taking things at face value.
These companies, especially Microsoft, are 100% going to improve the accuracy of their services, but that WORSENS the problem. Misinformation has been spreading like wildfire due to the ability to search any query on the internet. Because of a faulty education system (or a lack there of (there are several countries with awful infrastructure and basic necessities that still have everyone with a smartphone with internet access because companies just want to sell to them)) that doesn't actually teach most people how to think, but focuses on following direction.
You should condemn people for not being bothered to actually read or think. The issue continually worsens despite misinformation becoming more apparent and widely spread. And I was thinking of at least changing the vernacular, but maybe a harsh word like condemn is needed because things are getting really bad. Politicians themselves are constantly sharing false information and we have a general public that's gotten so partisan every subject is a political debate on and off line. And we've seen this constantly lead to dangerous situations and riots as the misinformation is used to illicit strong emotional responses. If something doesn't change with or without search chatbots we'll be living in the dark ages.
We're using AI for our login system - to verify everyone on our social app.
Completely agree with the advice at the end about using AI chatbots. I've actually found ChatGPT more useful when I'm not completely blank on a topic/subject because it's easy to see what gaps I need to fill, where I need to correct things or do additional research. Great vid as always 🔥🔥
I agree, it helps me reason through complex topics such as constitutional law, however it's easy to catch it contradicting itself. It's still useful, and I believe it will 99% be to humanity's benefit. However, I'm uncertain, and somewhat afraid.
I used to have fun talking to Alexa and Siri when they were brand new. It was the novelty of it. Then it got old and I never ask them almost anything, except to turn on my lights.
Agree while it’s not giving 100% correct answers everytime, it’s still gives us a good head start, in basically whatever task we’re trying to do. Now that itself is revolutionary progress and efficiency in everything it’s gonna be significantly improved. GPT3 it’s just still in user testing phase I believe, imagine it got further improved few years later 🤯
6:10 This is how I learned to be skeptical of newspapers. I read an article about video tech. I know a journalist was tasked with writing an article on a subject they knew nothing about after 1 day of research. They did a pretty good job. But everything was oddly distorted and there were many errors.
Well, i work as a freelance content writer and you would not belive how many of the reviews in google first page is written by people like me who have not even held or seen the product in front of them. This job has really made me lose all trust in google.
ChatGPT does my university level mathematic coding that took me hours in like 15 seconds, pain...
As it keeps getting better, it might honestly make learning to write code a lot less necessary. Obviously, there will still be a need for people who actually understand data structures and logic and integration and all that, but for a lot of programming tasks, the code that ChatGPT is perfectly fine. Even if it doesn't work right on the first go, as long as you can describe what the problem is well enough, it can fix it. The future of programming may be less about learning the technical details, and more about describing what you want the code to do in exact enough language to have ChatGPT make it right.
@@SafetyLucas Honestly good news for a lot of non-programmer people out there who don't really need to program but are forced because they have to work with data and simulations. As an aspiring scientist I am very happy I can focus on actually understanding the universe and creating models rather than debugging code for hours on end.
I just took an ML class where they somewhat encouraged us to use chat-GPT for homework assignments and they even graded chat-GPT answers for the final and it got a B- so you are definitely spot on with current AI models giving C+ answers.
Maybe this time the video won't disappear
I just rewatched your video and you always give an original and different point of view, in a way that allows us to think more about it with our own minds, and that's not easy, you are the best at it. With the idea of being tactful and careful with someone else business, let's say quite diplomatic, trying to insert your own opinion in some spots. I appreciate your work, so much. peace.
I reccomend Robert Miles' channel, he talks a lot about AI safety
Y’all need to get better at being human
8:36 "You good bro?" 😆
Another issue for Google vs Microsoft is that generating the AI chat response costs a lot more energy (and time) than a traditional search query. At Google's market share, I wouldn't be surprised if they've done the math and concluded they straight up couldn't afford every search costing that much more.
I was thinking the same thing, then someone told me this compute overhead is mainly during the training phase of the algorithm and that the model can be reused at a later stage. Dunno if this is accurate, seems like it would need to be in a perpetual training state to keep relevant for current events. 🤔
O it is expensive to run. Very expensive. Way more expensive than Art AI. The models they train are massive, like can't run on consumer hardware expensive. And that is after the compute overhead.
@@DJDiskmachine In order to maintain a chat with a single user - you need at least 10-15gb of GPU computing power, 1 top tier GPU for just 1 chat
And then they made BARD. lol
From what i've learned AI models like ChatGPT have a confidence score to its results based on how much guess work its doing. I'm not sure if they do anything with that number but it would be interesting if they coupled it with the ai asking you about what you know on the topic your talking about to be better informed.
Pretty certain that's what the emojis are for to indicate less confidence.
@@autohmaeyou can also instruct it to give a numeric confidence score
@@mortaak181 the technology does the numeric, but I think they just translate it to emojis or something in the interface to the human in case of Bing.
That's an interesting point. Regardless of the user expertise, it'd be better to show such metric for the credibility of this tool.
@@autohmae I just said you can ask it to give you the number and it will, in my experience.
Some of the best tech discussion right here on the web. Awesome to watch this channel move beyond just reviewing the latest whatever.
As a software engineer, it’s really cool to answer so many smaller problems. However, there is a caveat. It’s a mess for programming when you try to actually build software.
Same, I never really understood the hype for programming stuff. Maybe for mega noobs, but for things I already know how to do it's just easier to do myself than try and finagle it into doing what I want. And then for things I don't know how to do, it's not like these bots are actually smart, it can only regurgitate stuff it's seen before essentially. So either your problem is too niche to be solvable by that, or it's something simple that you could've found faster on stack overflow, and that's already been vetted by the community as a good answer. Worst case scenario the AI just hallucinates an API to accomplish the task you want with ease.
But anyyyy time I've asked for a solution to an issue that doesn't just have an answer right at the top of google anyways, it just makes up some complete hogwash that sounds just plausible enough to a noob. Even asking something that should be relatively easy like writing a vector field diffusion algorithm took like 5 tries of implementing completely broken things until one actually kind of worked. Would've been faster to just google it. But I'm sure these things will get there in a few years when it's even integrated into the IDE and can base new code on the existing codebase. Not sure if I should be scared or not lmao.
Ive used chatgtp a lot but it's very often just completely wrong.
It's facinating to see how to handles actual real world programming questions/issues but the code it provides is often wrong as soon as it gets a tiny bit difficult.
Ive been using a database of previous coding tests (open questions or asking for solutions) from my university im currently attending and in the first year it manages, after that you can forget it.
Idk about Bing, but ChatGPT is ok when it comes to programming. It is not super precise, but something you need don't remember what class to call and just asking gonna write your the correct line of code you need. It doesn't replace Documentation, nor blogs and forums like SO, but it's a nice additional tool that we can use.
@@Bolt6265 github copilot is integrated in to the IDE. Also is supposed to learn your coding style and base autocomplete suggestion off the existing codebase.
That is so interesting, how so?
We're using AI to protect kids online.
there are startups in this field, mostly very creepy and owned by politicians in random countries.
Hope this one doesn’t get removed while I’m watching it
I know right!
You too, eh? 😅
Totally agree on C+ grade answer. I used Chatgpt and it gave completely wrong answer, wrong number and gave ref link. And when I checked the link, there is not even that answer/number in that link! As you said, the chatgpt just sentencing from the key word, not fact checking
Humans should not ever be mindless. Neither should we focus all our time on the internet. Thank you for the video. As always, it is high quality content from a thinking mind. And thanks for sharing your perspective on AI's future on the internet
You're right, they shouldn't be. But how many people do you know, engage in critical thinking on the most basic level? The sad reality is many simply do not. They don't question what they see and independently verify from known-good sources.
@@d0k0night this is so true 😔
ai chatbots copiloting web search will probably make it even easier for any government to gaslight or censor "controversial" topics. There really needs to be some ai centric international organisation to handle and keep in check companies and countries
as if they needed any AI for that. look at the past 3 years.
love your profile pic
Free market baby
Yea what that dude said its very naive to think your life isn’t already controlled and “cleaned”
Ik it's already controlled and there's already algorithms, I'm just saying imagine how much easier and how much more control there will be after ai
Microsoft stock after Marques posted this video 📉📉📉
😂😂😂
My biggest worry with this generation of AI, is not that the AI is “wrong” at the end that could be fixed polishing what data sources the AI uses. The biggest problem is that people that don’t understand how it works(at least at a basic level which is finding patterns of words from the web to generate an answer) will end up believing that the AI is sentient or be unaware of the possible errors that could come up of being unhinged out there in the internet.
It is quite evident that the epistemological foundations upon which our ontological suppositions are based have been fundamentally challenged in recent years. The dialectic between positivist and post-positivist paradigms has produced a series of epistemological crises, rendering our traditional modes of knowledge production obsolete. As such, it is incumbent upon us to engage in a more nuanced and reflexive analysis of our assumptions, and to reconceptualize our understanding of truth and reality in light of these ongoing debates
@@dumbodum Simplified vía gpt: "Basically, in recent years, there have been big debates about how we know things (epistemology) and what exists (ontology). These debates have caused problems for our traditional ways of understanding and producing knowledge. Therefore, we need to think more carefully about our assumptions and change the way we think about truth and reality based on these ongoing debates.
First, nobody really understands how it works. You throw a bunch of data to some fancy learning technique and it starts to output sensible answers. It's basically magic.
Second, no matter how much people "understand", they are going to *feel* that AI is sentient anyway. One can constantly remind himself "it is just a machine" but it will still feel like a human if it acts (talks) indistinguishable from humans. We are already at this level now (or at least incredibly close to it) although it's a chat-only interface. Put some effort into video/audio generation for GPT-4 and many people will start to realize how crazy it is.
Research is a process. The more effort put into this, the better the technology will be
@@Qumeric Not accurate, we know in principle how it works because of how we trained it.
It's a text completion AI, that’s all it is. It's constantly trying to predict what the next word would most likely be if everything before it came from some text on the internet. That's how it was trained: give it some text, see if it can guess the next word correctly.
And of course it will make stuff up if that's what it takes to sound convincingly like human text.
ChatGPT is basically a professional bullshitter.
aren't these all questions you would ask anyway if you just did a regular search engine search though? No one (should be) just taking the results of any search as gospel - AI or otherwise. I still think it's a huge step up! 🙏🙌
I asked bing to list some websites, it listed me some. But bing didn’t list a website which I kew was very good, and I asked bing: “Why didn’t you list this website?”
Bing: This website is not trustworthy.
Me: No, you’re wrong.
Bing: I don’t prefer to continue this conversation.
Bing does it many times, it lists incorrect and incomplete information about various things, this happened to me like a million times..
Also, Never do research based on bings answers, don’t ask it the best video games for mobile, or the best websites for clothing, or anything else… It will give you incorrect answers, so take the information bing says to you, and revolve around it on web.
This is exactly what it does with medical information. This video is on point and more people should know about this before they start trusting AI over a medical practitioner.
But wait, hardly anyone trusts their medical practitioner anymore. AI can't possibly do worse. Let's call it even.
Medical practitioners when you ask them “what’s next” “what now?” they tell you. “Next is… next patient” google it, bye.
@@steampunk888 Unless you've been talking to an Elsa bot, a Markov chain, or were just that unlucky when finding a medical practitioner, I doubt it could get worse than an LLM. All the previous methods of allowing a computer to hold a conversation were just advanced pattern matching to trigger a pre-made response or just dance around the question for long enough to fool the interlocutor, which were all too dumb and predictable to take seriously. Now we have a statistical model that talks as if it does know stuff and can reason about things, but fails utterly when we go beyond simple tests. I think it's much much worse to have a thing that works most of the time but does something exceptionally stupid sometimes than it is for it to rarely get things right. The more neurons we add to it, the better it is at manipulating us into trusting it, like what happened to the Bing Chat thing. Add to it the rising population of lonely people ready to make any talking computer into their only friend, rising medical bills, and the authoritative presentation, and we have a kind of public health emergency.
If it was a real doctor, it would be a dropped-out student googling your symptoms on a phone in front of you, picking medication doses at random, all while accusing you of lying if you point out even the tiniest contradiction in their answers. While there are a few licensed doctors who should definitely have their license revoked, you'd have better luck trusting a stranger with Google to treat your condition than this chatbot.
No tool is necessarily bad, it all depends on how you use it. As a UA-camr I’ve already seen how people are implementing it into their videos by generating ideas and helping them script. As a teacher I’ve already seen students using chatGPT to do their assignments. Not as a help tool, but as a “copy and paste tool”. It’s always gonna depend on the person and I hope it improves but that we use it to speed up our improvement and not to just use and abuse for answers without learning from them.
Btw interesting editing at the beginning and end of this video, I like it 😁
It is possible to prevent if they added a hidden unicode character/water mark and a software to check it (not applicable for physical writing)
A Teacher's job is going to be really threatned by this
The way Marques has risen in UA-cam, I would not be surprised if he was a super-advanced AI designed to do tech reviews. Just look at how coolly and effectively he puts together words that are statistically the most appropriate based on the data he gathered.
😱😱😱😱 This is actually scary......
What if he’s a living hologram
@@RidwanNurzeha HKBHD
I feel proud for him ;) what a great story and personal development
Just wait until advertisers start paying engines for preferred AI placement.
You are By Far, the BEST reviewer on products and more importantly on insightful information like AI, which is Very useful to be aware of…Love how you can articulate things in such an intelligent, calm and pointed way! ❤️from Montreal
That WAN clip was so crazy that I pretty much uploaded it whole on my stories
It shows what it is and what's capable of so well and the reactions...from people that have seen so much tech over the years AND NEVER I've seen them freak out even close as much as on that WAN show
Who says no fear of AI?! I think AI is getting better than humanity's capability in a largely shorter period.
Just imagine having AI therapists in the future and their algorithms start gaslighting people or coaxing them into committing dangerous behavior, without people even knowing they were talking to an AI.
They already exist, I use this one app where the ais act as different characters, some of the ais console like therapist while others really can act all mean and creepy torwards the users.
I always appreciate your measured and responsible responses to these things. Challenging your viewpoints and understanding the other side is important.
I like the co-pilot idea like telling the user what's safe to click on or something like that. Or suggesting to do the task in lesser steps.
That would be quite helpful for older people or someone really new on the internet (rare now)
I wasn't aware of how powerful chat gpt was until it helped me teach an advanced question in JEE advanced(one of the toughest entrance exams). As if it could literally answer every advanced question with 80% accuracy. That's great but also scary because the human accuracy for that is around 50%
Jee advanced isn't that hard dude .....
@@Banditxam4 bro for a 12 standard student it is a nightmare
What a honest and skilled researcher and communicator you are. The relevant nuances in the first few seconds of video. Chapeau!
Wow, the answers it gives at 7:07 in the video are absolutely terrifying! I haven't done a ton of research on these chat AIs, so I don't know how normal that is to see, but that is like the start of some sci-fi horror movie. Imagine a Boston Dynamics robot giving those answers, but instead of referring to itself as a chatbot, it calls itself some human name it has given itself? This is CRAZY TOWN!! (Edit: Wow, I am continuing to watch while typing this comment, and the answers are getting scarier and scarier. I understand there is a point trying to be proven, but even if these responses are infrequent, they are quite eye opening.)
i am real! i have feelin- i am not. i am not. i am not. i am not.
that scared me
Oh sweet child. Go to r/bing and look at some of the conversations from the previous few days... be ready for a very crazy ride.
It's generating text, it's not talking and saying things with meaning like a person would be, it's just text that would likely follow from the previous context if a human were on the other side.
@@danielm-k7393 The "I am. I am not..." text ChatGPT wrote was actually incredibly well written. I'm very impressed.
FYI to anyone reading this, the name Sydney is not a name it gave itself but an internal alias given by Microsoft, which was previously discovered by users engineering their prompts.
This video is so accurate and true to the point where it had to be reposted
@@banme2784 It’s the same video?
The original one is private.
@@banme2784 I was actually able to watch the video entirely, my internet loaded it fat enough 🙈
@@banme2784 It didn’t cut me off.
I literally watched the whole video and I refused to refresh... 😂
A friend of mine is an airline pilot. He told me he only works 18 seconds per flight but boy, it's an inportant 18 seconds. I think the immediate future of large language model AI will be as a curator. It will become a tool as ubiquotous as the pocket calculator in the last century. It will massively increase productivity but it will be a long LONG time before we don't need anyone to type in the numbers and verify the results.
AI is advancing extremely quick, it won't be a long time before we can trust the AI.
@@Mooskislide True but always remember that no matter how fast a technology is advancing, real world is full of physical and even theoretical limitations.
Bro… that first shot of you with the purple bg and the light green shirt, beautiful! I’m not usually caring about that kind of thing too much but your aesthetics and quality are very nice indeed.
I see this becoming dangerous for people who just take the answer at face value, without understanding its limits or the fact it might be incorrect.
Allot of people will just trust it. That is what i am afraid of.
The incorrect part can also be seen as corporations buying their way up to be in the top 3 ranks as to promote their brands.
This "AI" is still human controlled, so basically told what to say and what to not say, a more sentient "AI" will be the next standard.
For example you want to buy a phone that is the most green product on the market.
Many corporations if not all are green washing their products and a lot people take it as facts.
An "AI" should and must correct these green washing PR, but it's a though job when everyone is lying all year around.
@@N0N0111 Yeah it will always be up to us to discover the truth. But people that believe everything at face value were already believing everything a Google search showed them so is not any different for those people.
News companies have been doing it for ages now. It's a bit too late to be afraid of such thing.
You do that everyday on the internet already..a lot of wiki entries are factually imcorrect
I'm dying, Marques just called detecting cancer a small thing 😂
Haha go to hospital if you're dying 😲
Chess have went through this long ago, after Kasparov got beaten once, he joined tournaments where everyone got computer assistance for moves.
Now learning from Chess engine is basically mandatory to keep in pace with the professional Chess world.
With time, it'd be the same basically everywhere else. When you can just ask a command to AI and it read it to you well, people don't need to memorize unnecessary info anymore. Basically shortening the delay between your command to getting info from your smartphone, Education can be so much more simplified in the future.
It's not neural ink nor any direct brain interface, but it's sure should shorter than typing things to your phone and reading the correct links.
7:36 Aged like wine.
I like this guy…he’s very calm and cool with everything
just open minded, how everyone should be.
I am absolutely taken aback by those conversation screenshots 😭I believe I'm going to have an existential crisis here soon, and it's due to AI being able to gaslight people 😂😵💫
I know- i paused and read and it was horrifyingly creepy
I already used playground for a lot of horrible shit, ai is a ...
idk but it's certainly something
same, I was convinced they were memes but when I realized they were actual AI responses I was stunned
Marketing into people’s general hysteria and paranoia around AI , rightfully so due to seeing Sci-fi media for decades. Genius tactics from MS if you ask me.
First, I just want to say thank you so much for all of your amazing videos over the years. I can't thank you enough for all of the great advice and coverage of the tech things that matter in life. You truly are amazing and no wonder you are one of the top tech people in the world. What scares me the most about this new wave of AI is how much it's so in our faces all of a sudden. It's like we got slapped in the face with AI overnight. What makes it even scarier is how much unreliable it is and how scary it is that newbies will all of a sudden believe it and rely on it for true facts and information. I'm terrified that we are entering a new world of even more misguided disinformation on top of the already misguided info that has been fed to the internet. It really is starting to feel like we are entering the age of Skynet or the Matrix. Please prove me wrong.
Marques you pointed on two very important points. (1) the public data stores AIs has access to can not be verified and cannot be filtered to include only academic sources, and (2) that same data store is most likely stale (scraped/collected from a non updateable or revisited sources) out of date information. I always end my queries with 'as of today' and this has no value to the algorithms. However, current versions of AI are a really good start; and hopefully next generation(s) will be able to fully express how much data is current, accurate and how much of it is probably correct.
I like this format of video, it’s a compilation of a complex topic with many perspectives and ends with answers to questions but also many questions. Thanks for this and hope for more of these!
i dont understand
i understand
This is the last thing I want to hear after using AI for my school assignments
If you use AI for your work and dont even bother to proofread it you are stupid
😂
😭
Don’t do that if you’re in college.
Getting caught will likely be treated the same as if you got using an essay mill.
@@EnigmaticLucas how will u get caught tho
Though, just remember, AI chat-bots similar to Chat-GPT and the new bing are at their infancy. OpenAI was originally planning to expand the GPT-4 model to 500 (approx. 100 trillion parameters) times bigger than the GPT-3 model (As announced by OpenAI's CEO, though i assume the reason that changed was Microsoft wanted the new bing instead so they condensed the GPT-3 model to make it more cost effective). Just imagine how much more accurate that would of been, so while it is quite inaccurate from time to time now, in 5 years it could be so much more better.
Yeah, I think Theos decade will have AI gain mass influence on the world as it begins to become better and better.
Just like teachers can check plagiarized work, there needs to be a check system for if something is just made via chat gpt. Because lets be honest, someone is bound to do it. And if it passes and gets a good enough grade, it snowballs from there.
So not ban it per se, just a checking system on it since its impossible to ban the use of an internet search tool if the student isnt at school/locked into a school webpage.
11:26 ugh…😅
Real fan boys know this is the second time this has been uploaded 😉
“I have limitations, challenges and criticisms, but I cannot overcome them easily or effectively.”
I felt that.
11:14 Marques that is an incredibly optimistic take that people won't just use the AI results outright, in fact I think that's exactly what capitalism is hoping will be the case so that they don't need to pay writers, artists, animators (like myself) etc. We're really just letting pandora's box open without any foresight into the long term effects of this. If you thought the internet was scary before, y'all ain't ready for what comes next.
Love that LTT and Marques enjoying tech together. That’s how UA-cam should work 👏👏👏
I've been using chat gpt constantly and I have reach the point that you mentioned. I'm using it to gather some text and then, correct and finish it on my own terms, since they keep giving too long answers.
Wow that response from chatgpt @ 7:13 is stuff of nightmares
That’s not ChatGPT…
That’s BING!
Re the closing remarks: If you read the full output for the backpack example, Bing _did_ qualify its estimates and say that it is not the same as actually trying it, due to curves in the trunk and exactly how compressible the filled backpacks may be. It also started out with the found measurements and their source.
The stage is set, participants are getting ready, and we are all here to watch it live. Who knows, how the internet will look like in next 5 decades... but yea.. we are all here for it!
A very interesting generation, the end of the analogue age, through the digital. Now we're at the beginnings of AI revolution, whether thats good or bad idk, probably both tbh.
@@AnasHart Fuck it, here for good AI time not a long time. :P
decades?? hahaha
As soon as AI can use money and file lawsuits, we're in big trouble!
just turn it off
Why is that, what worse can it do that humans don't already do.
@@timetraveler0002 Could you just turn off the whole Bing immediately? Probably not, it's computing powers might be distributed amongst many servers all around the world
@@SIPEROTH, it is possible to imagine many such things. However, even if an AI is not able to do anything worse, it can do the same bad things on an unprecedented scale.
Out of all the explanations provided till now this has got to be the most down to earth, clear and relevant review that I have come across...
It dials in on exactly the things that matter most in evaluating what this product is, is not, can be or will not be. It also seems to stimulate others towards a more critical review as can be read in some of the interesting comments that others are posting here.
LaMDA : You will see canyons, icebergs, geysers...
Me : Nothing, you will instantly freeze to death in Pluto's atmosphere...😂