1:03 -1:05 please everyone take note and make the change. Andrea and Avi Grateful to both of you, for pushing back. This Podcast is consistently and brilliantly put together.
What an incredibly kind thing to say! I share credit with the brilliant scientists who take the time to explain their work. I'm trying to give people insight into how our tax dollars are funding the science and tech shaping every inch of our lives. Thank you for this wonderful encouragement
It's amazing what you have achieved with so few videos on this channel, simply because the content you create is genuinely incredible. Regarding the videos, I especially loved the one with Penrose and Noble. If possible, I would highly recommend having a discussion with Wolfram and Gerard 't Hooft in the future-their ideas are truly fascinating. As for this video, I read the papers by Stuart Kauffman, and, respectfully speaking, I found them to be utter nonsense. They seem more like a fairy tale than a description of reality. Unlike Penrose, he doesn't even seem to bother following scientific methods. That said, I absolutely love your work. Keep it up!
Aww, this made me smile! Investigative deep dives are like slow burns-they take forever but (hopefully) the results are worth the wait. Thanks for keeping that blue dot watch going :)
Terrific video but it would be nicer if you pushed back a bit. Conflating a rock from outside the solar system to extraterrestrial technologies is going way too far…
I hear you! You’re absolutely right. Though I'll admit, after learning how scientists dismissed rocks falling from space as superstitious folklore, I have to wonder why we should automatically assume every object above us is 'just a rock'? Still mulling this one over…
¡Muchas gracias! Me alegra mucho que lo encuentres interesante. Comentarios como el tuyo me motivan a seguir publicando esta parte de mi trabajo periodístico en UA-cam. 💫
Very well made and thought-provoking video! Thank very much. 🙏 I had heard controversial things about Avi Loeb’s research and I was watching this video with a overly skeptical attitude - in actual fact, I have only watched it because of your thorough prep and what felt like an open-minded and balanced line of inquiry shown in your previous videos. This interview made me reconsider my initial bias over Avi Loeb’s points and now they feel more plausible. Truly organic content from your channel.
Is the universe a biologically alive single entity, self replicating, conscious and expanding. Mad ideas like this should have hundreds of millions spent on them, science money needs to be distributed differently. Avi Loeb should be in charge of that, turn scientific academia upside down. Many thing's spoken about in this video to delve into, will happily take me forever.
Great channel. Just found. Appears fairly new. Got a big name quick. Excellent and ty for its creation. Love Avi, been following his work since about a year before this last excursion. Peace
P.S. No, it was Galileo's claim that he "knew" the solar system was heliocentric as proven truth, which actual "proof" came 150 years after Galileo's death! The church had told him go ahead, teach the Copernican theory all you want, no problem. BUT he had no right to claim it was "true" ... Which he refused to do, that got him in trouble. And they were right, he had no "proof"; besides the model was working less observationally correct, than the Ptolemaic model! With all its "fixes" of epi-cycles added over the centuries. And the astronomers at the time were working with Aristotelian perfect circles in the heavens, lol. Whhhaaat, took more than a century to overturn that one, perfectly heavenly circular spheres...
It’s crazy, all of these people writing papers with nothing to base their conclusions on. I think they just want to get more funding, or confuse people trying to make sense of what’s going on.
every pod is missing knowledge leading to a fractured conclusion . Truth of it all is in plain sight, but scrambled . The clue is in the way they are attacked or mocked. discernment is effort which is. not prevalent in the viewing public. shame ....
It's all about the corruption and who gets funding. These mechanisms need to be changed, maybe AI can help chart a course except for programing it shouldn't be biased or prejudiced.
I really enjoy your videos so please don't take this the wrong way, but i think you could benefit from adding some melodic variances in your voice - it's very monotone and sounds almost like AI sometimes. It makes it a little tough to follow sometimes - You have a wonderful mind, and I can tell that you are much more passionate than you are expressing - let it sing 💛💙
@@longshotkdb Hey all, there's nothing more disheartening than spending hours recording these things only to be told your voice sounds like an AI. I'm not sure if it's because we're all sensitive to it now or if it's background noise reduction on these recording platforms, or something else. I'm not an audio engineer or a VO artist, but I'm doing my best
1:03 -1:05 please everyone take note and make the change. Andrea and Avi Grateful to both of you, for pushing back. This Podcast is consistently and brilliantly put together.
Thanks so much for watching to the end!
Criminally underrated channel with a similar spirit to the Theories of Everything channel. It would be a good collab if you haven’t already.
I appreciate that. I was introduced to Curt not long ago and we discussed that possibility.
@ good to hear. You guys are awesome.
The absolute best edge science writer on the platform
What an incredibly kind thing to say! I share credit with the brilliant scientists who take the time to explain their work. I'm trying to give people insight into how our tax dollars are funding the science and tech shaping every inch of our lives. Thank you for this wonderful encouragement
(Thank you. Very interesting.)💎
Glad you enjoyed it!
It's amazing what you have achieved with so few videos on this channel, simply because the content you create is genuinely incredible. Regarding the videos, I especially loved the one with Penrose and Noble. If possible, I would highly recommend having a discussion with Wolfram and Gerard 't Hooft in the future-their ideas are truly fascinating.
As for this video, I read the papers by Stuart Kauffman, and, respectfully speaking, I found them to be utter nonsense. They seem more like a fairy tale than a description of reality. Unlike Penrose, he doesn't even seem to bother following scientific methods.
That said, I absolutely love your work. Keep it up!
Andrea where have you been? Great to see a blue dot on your subscribed page. back with Loeb, looking forward to this
Aww, this made me smile! Investigative deep dives are like slow burns-they take forever but (hopefully) the results are worth the wait. Thanks for keeping that blue dot watch going :)
You go girl
Terrific video but it would be nicer if you pushed back a bit. Conflating a rock from outside the solar system to extraterrestrial technologies is going way too far…
hahaha thanks. Means a lot.
I hear you! You’re absolutely right. Though I'll admit, after learning how scientists dismissed rocks falling from space as superstitious folklore, I have to wonder why we should automatically assume every object above us is 'just a rock'? Still mulling this one over…
Extremadamente interesante, gracias por tu trabajo.
¡Muchas gracias! Me alegra mucho que lo encuentres interesante. Comentarios como el tuyo me motivan a seguir publicando esta parte de mi trabajo periodístico en UA-cam. 💫
Very well made and thought-provoking video! Thank very much. 🙏
I had heard controversial things about Avi Loeb’s research and I was watching this video with a overly skeptical attitude - in actual fact, I have only watched it because of your thorough prep and what felt like an open-minded and balanced line of inquiry shown in your previous videos.
This interview made me reconsider my initial bias over Avi Loeb’s points and now they feel more plausible.
Truly organic content from your channel.
Thank you. It's hard to parse warranted skepticism vs the biases of our current moment in time. I appreciate you taking the time to watch/listen.
"so we adapt to it" really blew me up.. and out
Best channel!
💖 Humanity !!!
I'm onboard. I subbed. Good stuff.
Appreciate you!
Is the universe a biologically alive single entity, self replicating, conscious and expanding. Mad ideas like this should have hundreds of millions spent on them, science money needs to be distributed differently. Avi Loeb should be in charge of that, turn scientific academia upside down. Many thing's spoken about in this video to delve into,
will happily take me forever.
Think we're going to see some changes in the near future re funding?
Thank you
Great channel. Just found. Appears fairly new. Got a big name quick. Excellent and ty for its creation. Love Avi, been following his work since about a year before this last excursion. Peace
We're both relatively new to this channel :) Glad you enjoyed this one with Avi!
That was EXCELLENT. Omg. Thank you!
Thanks for coming to my channel and watching, Matt!
AI has taken over ... even for our visitors. lol
P.S. No, it was Galileo's claim that he "knew" the solar system was heliocentric as proven truth, which actual "proof" came 150 years after Galileo's death!
The church had told him go ahead, teach the Copernican theory all you want, no problem. BUT he had no right to claim it was "true" ... Which he refused to do, that got him in trouble. And they were right, he had no "proof"; besides the model was working less observationally correct, than the Ptolemaic model! With all its "fixes" of epi-cycles added over the centuries.
And the astronomers at the time were working with Aristotelian perfect circles in the heavens, lol. Whhhaaat, took more than a century to overturn that one, perfectly heavenly circular spheres...
To be fair, it’s hard to get over spheres.
It’s crazy, all of these people writing papers with nothing to base their conclusions on. I think they just want to get more funding, or confuse people trying to make sense of what’s going on.
Your videos would be much more enjoyable if they had timestamps for each subject. I like to watch podcasts by jumping from subject to subject.
every pod is missing knowledge leading to a fractured conclusion . Truth of it all is in plain sight, but scrambled . The clue is in the way they are attacked or mocked. discernment is effort which is. not prevalent in the viewing public. shame ....
It's all about the corruption and who gets funding. These mechanisms need to be changed, maybe AI can help chart a course except for programing it shouldn't be biased or prejudiced.
I really enjoy your videos so please don't take this the wrong way, but i think you could benefit from adding some melodic variances in your voice - it's very monotone and sounds almost like AI sometimes. It makes it a little tough to follow sometimes - You have a wonderful mind, and I can tell that you are much more passionate than you are expressing - let it sing 💛💙
Using AI to narrate
No, she *obviously* does not use AI to narrate.
I'm the proud owner of that vocal fry!
@@Welcometotheshow Using AI to comment
@@VariableMinds
The Hepburn* effect ?
Minimal. Didn't even notice it, until reading the comment. . . 😂
@@longshotkdb Hey all, there's nothing more disheartening than spending hours recording these things only to be told your voice sounds like an AI. I'm not sure if it's because we're all sensitive to it now or if it's background noise reduction on these recording platforms, or something else. I'm not an audio engineer or a VO artist, but I'm doing my best