Does anyone know the difference between Off timer and Eco Timer? For me Off timer displays the message that the monitor is turning off after the configured period has passed and I can disable the power off and the Eco timer doesn't seem to do anything. Using firmware 1004.
Amazing review, I have the smart version, and it's near perfect. Wish it had 1600px height and an adjustable curve like the corsair flex, but other than that, it's really awesome.
Update: The G9 is still amazing for fps games and racing, but I ended up switching to a 55" S90C which uses the same panel. Have it on a monitor stand with wheels, and it's perfect for my current usecase (work and non-competitive gaming)
@@maddada Hello, how you doing man? What do you think provides better PC gaming experience? G9 49" qd-oled or S95C 55 " tv? i mostly play cooperative and singleplayer games and occasionally i emulate games, but i do usually play battlefiled, cod, csgo and PvE tactical shooters with my friends. I have also been gaming on VR since 2019, i have never experienced motion sickness, so super-ultrawide most likely wont make me motion sick. Thanks in advance brother.
@@wolveslands6701 for non-comoetitive single/multiplayer gaming the 55" is better (much bigger display, very immersive) While for competitive the 49" ultra wide is better. Also for desktop usage and productivity I much prefer the 55" tv but it's personal preference, and you need to find a way to stand the tv away from you (I have mine on a TV stand with wheels after the table and move the TV around the house sometimes, I can do this because my table isn't near the wall). Also worth to consider that the tv is much cheaper while giving your a bigger usable area. While the 55" is cramped height wise. All the best
@@8DarthGhost8 my current is a i9-12900k, 32GB ddr5 mem at 6200MT with sub 30CL (I think like 26 at 1.46v can’t remember) nvidia 4090. It’s a big overkill for the monitor as I noticed the 4090 doesn’t hit 100% power and I originally designed the specs to be 4k, which it was until I got this monitor
Don't buy it, this guy doesn't have a clue, do your homework and google search the monitor and issues. Its great if you want to run an HDMI cable but to get the max out of the monitor u need the DP and it has issues.
Is it possible to have 2 screens from different sources next to each other at the same time? I want to use this mainly as a 2 monitor setup for my Mac and Ps5
Actually don't buy it. My 49"g9 died just out of warranty and I opened it up and the heatsink on the main board was not touching the chip, the thermal paste was untouched, and the heatsink was actually stamped BAD on the underside of it. Samsung assembled my monitor with a part that didn't pass quality control. Screw Samsung. There is a reddit thread with pictures titled "49" G9 quality control" if you want to see the heatsink.
Picked mine up for $650 from a guy that buys Amazon returns. New in box untouched and flawless. Still learning how to fight fitting multiple windows all around the monitor, so I'm doing a lot of dragging windows all around. I am trying out DisplayFusion though and it offers a lot of great options. I'm using the monitor for Productivity, so my needs are a bit different.
Hi there! I've been enjoying your fantastic reviews on various displays. Thanks for all the valuable insights! 😋However, I'm still struggling to decide between the G93SC (non-smart TV) and the G95SC (smart TV with reportedly laggy Tizen OS). The G93SC is essentially the non-smart version of the G9 OLED, but it also boasts Picture-in-Picture mode alongside Picture-by-Picture mode. Conversely, the G95SC, with its smart TV capabilities, only offers Picture-by-Picture mode. I'm particularly drawn to the idea of being able to set custom window sizes with PIP on the G93SC, especially for creating a 21:9 window for games where there's significant stretching at the edges in 32:9 (as you often pointed out in your videos). It seems like this feature is exclusive to the slightly cheaper G93SC model compared to the G95SC. Is that accurate? Wouldn't owning the smart version be a downgrade in this case? Or am I wrong? I'm curious if it's possible to create a 21:9 window using PIP with the G93SC. If so, does it affect frame rate or disable HDR in any way? Can you utilize this feature with full 240Hz and HDR? Additionally, are there any important smart TV features that I might be overlooking? Both TVs are similarly priced in my country (with a $50 price difference). Given this, which one would you recommend? Looking forward to your insights! 😊 And thanks for reading this wall of text! 😅
@@thedisplayguy Thanks for the super quick answer; it’s appreciated ☺️. I‘m going to join your Patreon for the perfect settings and to say thank you. So, can you confirm the G95SC has no Picture-in-Picture mode? Just Picture-by-Picture? I don’t mind purchasing the more expensive version, but if the above is true, I will follow your advice and buy the G93SC instead.
Where do you make the image settings on the Samsung Odyssey OLED G93SC? Directly just on the device? (Only on the device, would be quite cumbersome) Or conveniently via PC?
From my experience, Amd 7900xt works very well with this resolution. Just mind that whatever gpu you have, a monitors vrr matters, G-Sync is ONLY Nvidia tech and can only be used by Nvidia gpus, Freesync and freesync premium is whatever vrr gpu card, it supports all Variable refresh rates. Meaning both Nvidia/amd & intel gpus. So only buy a gSync monitor if you are planning for a Nvidia gpu, the gsync tech costs the monitor makers about a 100 $ premium. That is why freesync is in more TVs and monitors, it has no premium cost for its implementation. Many people on Nvidia claim it better than freesync. Im not sure either is better, for me its hard to spot a difference at such premium tech costs, its all S-Tier in this price bracket. Monitors this teched up with oleds and Hz blazing fast. These screens cost more than most people spend on an entire pc setup, screen and pc. Its not being marketed for an average customer.
The "G93SC" seems to be of such high quality, but when I look at the USB-C ports from Samsung, I have to say it sucks, that means USB-C cables don't hold up and sometimes fall off again!
That's the best case scenario for this monitor I have a predecessor of this with an LCD panel and playing at 32:9 in the dark is the most immersive experience you can get without literally strapping the monitor to your face (aka VR)!
As a G9 first gen (LCD) owner, I would ABSOLUTELY recommend it at that price! 32:9 is absolutely AMAZING for games that support it and it's still a great monitor for games that just run in 16:9, plus the ability to use picture by picture and play in 21:9 with some other program open on the side or to have two 16:9 monitors in one seamless case is extremely useful to! (Just make sure this model does also support PBP if you're interested in that)
Got this for £806 on Prime Day but it's coming next month. They better honour the price 🥹 It's already gone up past £1000 now. Sneaky how they had no out of stock notice. Edit: It came early! 🎉
I have this monitor the ppi is so lacking & is not high enough resolution, my 4k hp spectre laptop amoled is sharper & easier on the eyes, ppi 220, you can see finer detail, with samsung g9 you can't ppi is only 110, i do have some buyers remorse.
lol welcome to monitors, they’re much larger than laptops. It’s 1440 so it’s the exact same as a 1440 27”. You’ll never get anywhere near 220 on a monitor. Best you’ll get is 163 on a 27” in 4k. All of this is mitigated by viewing distance tho. Btw your problem isn’t the resolution, it’s the pixel layout on QD-OLED. They’re not good for text.
Wtf you need higher ppi for, lmao! How close do you sit to your 27" x2 monitor? Cause the farther away you sit, the less ppi matters. 1440p is the best resolution for PC right now, anything higher only wastes performance and causes skaling issues on basically all OSes
@@LRM12o8 are you crazy, you don't care about beautiful graphic looking text, anybody that types needs high ppi over 200 so the text look beautiful & pristine, is necessary.
@@LRM12o8 you’re talking about a completely different thing. Viewing distance only affects seeing individual pixels. It doesn’t magically make a 109ppi monitor have the clarity/detail/sharpness of a 163ppi monitor. I do agree that 2k is perfect for gaming tho. 4k much better for work/reading text. Scaling on 4k isn’t an issue anymore for the vast majority of users btw.
@@LRM12o8 i had a friend looked at the text, i said does it look blurry, they said yes. The text looks like garbage. It literally strains the eyes, it's actually a liability. Qd oled is an incomplete technology, it's not at its peak.
Nah, I hate 49 inch and with OLED seeing as so much content is 16:9 you just run the risk of burning anything else in to the damn thing. 34 inch or even 38 inch is the sweet spot of UW gaming ( or at least 21:9 ) Oh and most games have horrendous SUW support to a point everything looks really warped. Its there on 21:9 but a lot less.
@@5ean5ean22 am not on about 16:9 gaming, a lot of games nowadays get 21:9 and 32:9 support ( although cutscenes are still mostly 16:9 and mods help there ). I am on about how webpages are set up and youtube. You will literally not be able to watch youtube on this thing unless you want burn in very quickly. Gaming is still all fish eyed though for almost any game that does support it, very little games have great SUW support as its a niche.
Mine is amazing you just throwing out buzzwords and don't know your anal cavity from a hole in the ground. You speak like someone who has never used oled. Cause if you had you would never want another type of display. And secondly there are a lot of games now with support for 32:9. 1515 games listed in the reddit thread and about 60% of those are listed as native 32:9 support
I hate stupidity, yet here is this comment. First point isn't true, most reviewers don't have a clue about gaming in this format I've been gaming at these ratios for over 10 years, the brightness is only bad compared to MiniLED, people actually using them are perfectly happy, he also said that even a bad glossy screen is better than any matte which is the majority of screens. There you go, maybe that will put a wrinkle on your smooth brain.
I recently got a 32:9. Before i had a 21:9 and before that it was 16:9 and before that, a 4:3 ratio. Its a niche item for a niche customer. Many people prefer the 16:9. Ive learned about myself that i very much search for wider screens. Ive reduced my setup from 3 to 2 to a 1 screen setup currently. Its a good setup if you like more single space to work on, but dont want more screens with their borders.
Thank you to Ruipro for sponsoring this video!
PLEASE SUPPORT My Work (Guides & Discord): patreon.com/TheDisplayGuy
Buy the Ruipro HDMI 2.1 Certified Fiber Optic Cable (6FT): amzn.to/3wvHB7j
Buy the Ruipro HDMI 2.1 Certified Fiber Optic Cable (25FT): amzn.to/432NDGS
Buy Ruipro Cables: ruipro.store/collections/all
Affiliate Links Below.
Buy Samsung OLED G93SC: amzn.to/3OX9NGx
Tizen OS Version OLED G95SC: amzn.to/42TujO7
Why these monitors doesn’t come with DisplayPort 2.1 is beyond my comprehension.
Does anyone know the difference between Off timer and Eco Timer? For me Off timer displays the message that the monitor is turning off after the configured period has passed and I can disable the power off and the Eco timer doesn't seem to do anything. Using firmware 1004.
Good review, under par product.
Not gonna buy this model.
Upcoming (with DisplayPort 2.1a) models are much better.
Patience leads to salvation.
Amazing review, I have the smart version, and it's near perfect.
Wish it had 1600px height and an adjustable curve like the corsair flex, but other than that, it's really awesome.
Update: The G9 is still amazing for fps games and racing, but I ended up switching to a 55" S90C which uses the same panel. Have it on a monitor stand with wheels, and it's perfect for my current usecase (work and non-competitive gaming)
@@maddada Hello, how you doing man?
What do you think provides better PC gaming experience?
G9 49" qd-oled or S95C 55 " tv? i mostly play cooperative and singleplayer games and occasionally i emulate games, but i do usually play battlefiled, cod, csgo and PvE tactical shooters with my friends.
I have also been gaming on VR since 2019, i have never experienced motion sickness, so super-ultrawide most likely wont make me motion sick.
Thanks in advance brother.
@@wolveslands6701 for non-comoetitive single/multiplayer gaming the 55" is better (much bigger display, very immersive)
While for competitive the 49" ultra wide is better.
Also for desktop usage and productivity I much prefer the 55" tv but it's personal preference, and you need to find a way to stand the tv away from you (I have mine on a TV stand with wheels after the table and move the TV around the house sometimes, I can do this because my table isn't near the wall).
Also worth to consider that the tv is much cheaper while giving your a bigger usable area. While the 55" is cramped height wise.
All the best
Nice backround man.. super sleek..
Cannot return to 16:9 for gameplay.
I love mine. Had it since November and gaming on it is a real immersive experience.
Bruno whats your pc specs?
@@ShailPM 14900k + 4090
Same. Love it and haven’t ran into any newer titles not having the native resolution.
@@Aloneinthedarksowhat are your PC specs?
@@8DarthGhost8 my current is a i9-12900k, 32GB ddr5 mem at 6200MT with sub 30CL (I think like 26 at 1.46v can’t remember) nvidia 4090. It’s a big overkill for the monitor as I noticed the 4090 doesn’t hit 100% power and I originally designed the specs to be 4k, which it was until I got this monitor
Don't buy it, this guy doesn't have a clue, do your homework and google search the monitor and issues. Its great if you want to run an HDMI cable but to get the max out of the monitor u need the DP and it has issues.
“Standard one year guarantee “ 😂…. Silly Americans… the standard is two years. 🇪🇺😂
Keep up the great work man, and hopefully you enjoy that Fleshlight you asked me for. Cheers brother
Is it possible to have 2 screens from different sources next to each other at the same time? I want to use this mainly as a 2 monitor setup for my Mac and Ps5
Yes, you can do that easily with this monitor. Each half part of screen can have a different video source.
Actually don't buy it. My 49"g9 died just out of warranty and I opened it up and the heatsink on the main board was not touching the chip, the thermal paste was untouched, and the heatsink was actually stamped BAD on the underside of it. Samsung assembled my monitor with a part that didn't pass quality control. Screw Samsung. There is a reddit thread with pictures titled "49" G9 quality control" if you want to see the heatsink.
Picked it up from amazon warehouse return for $702, only thing that turned out bad was the box itself; definitely worth that price!
wow what a blast to read also tho
And the monitor was all good?
i got mine for 900, same thing with me. Monitor works flawlessly!
I remember when I got My 3080 ti the same way $ 550🎉
Picked mine up for $650 from a guy that buys Amazon returns. New in box untouched and flawless. Still learning how to fight fitting multiple windows all around the monitor, so I'm doing a lot of dragging windows all around. I am trying out DisplayFusion though and it offers a lot of great options. I'm using the monitor for Productivity, so my needs are a bit different.
Hi there! I've been enjoying your fantastic reviews on various displays. Thanks for all the valuable insights! 😋However, I'm still struggling to decide between the G93SC (non-smart TV) and the G95SC (smart TV with reportedly laggy Tizen OS).
The G93SC is essentially the non-smart version of the G9 OLED, but it also boasts Picture-in-Picture mode alongside Picture-by-Picture mode. Conversely, the G95SC, with its smart TV capabilities, only offers Picture-by-Picture mode.
I'm particularly drawn to the idea of being able to set custom window sizes with PIP on the G93SC, especially for creating a 21:9 window for games where there's significant stretching at the edges in 32:9 (as you often pointed out in your videos). It seems like this feature is exclusive to the slightly cheaper G93SC model compared to the G95SC. Is that accurate? Wouldn't owning the smart version be a downgrade in this case? Or am I wrong?
I'm curious if it's possible to create a 21:9 window using PIP with the G93SC. If so, does it affect frame rate or disable HDR in any way? Can you utilize this feature with full 240Hz and HDR? Additionally, are there any important smart TV features that I might be overlooking?
Both TVs are similarly priced in my country (with a $50 price difference). Given this, which one would you recommend?
Looking forward to your insights! 😊 And thanks for reading this wall of text! 😅
The G93SC is better value. The G95SC can allegedly have the brightness doubled via a service menu hack. (Officially I don’t recommend service mods).
@@thedisplayguy Thanks for the super quick answer; it’s appreciated ☺️. I‘m going to join your Patreon for the perfect settings and to say thank you.
So, can you confirm the G95SC has no Picture-in-Picture mode? Just Picture-by-Picture? I don’t mind purchasing the more expensive version, but if the above is true, I will follow your advice and buy the G93SC instead.
Where do you make the image settings on the Samsung Odyssey OLED G93SC?
Directly just on the device? (Only on the device, would be quite cumbersome)
Or conveniently via PC?
This guy is gonna make a video about this monitor next saying not to buy it/he regrets it or its horrible don't buy it
Did he do this thing other times?
@@lucamarzola5875 he does it all the time it’s insane
Yes he does it with every video dudes a click bait wannabe because he has nothing original to say.
OLED has ruined me. IPS is dead to me now.
£450 on eBay used, no issues, in the UK, what a steal!
What graphics card would need to actually use this? I have a 4070 right now, using a G7 but looking to upgrade both within the next year.
I just ordered it 10 min ago, and will pair it with my 4090 rog strix OC! cant wait to switch from 32 inch to 49
From my experience, Amd 7900xt works very well with this resolution. Just mind that whatever gpu you have, a monitors vrr matters, G-Sync is ONLY Nvidia tech and can only be used by Nvidia gpus, Freesync and freesync premium is whatever vrr gpu card, it supports all Variable refresh rates. Meaning both Nvidia/amd & intel gpus. So only buy a gSync monitor if you are planning for a Nvidia gpu, the gsync tech costs the monitor makers about a 100 $ premium. That is why freesync is in more TVs and monitors, it has no premium cost for its implementation. Many people on Nvidia claim it better than freesync. Im not sure either is better, for me its hard to spot a difference at such premium tech costs, its all S-Tier in this price bracket.
Monitors this teched up with oleds and Hz blazing fast. These screens cost more than most people spend on an entire pc setup, screen and pc. Its not being marketed for an average customer.
I actually picked this up on Black Friday, for $999. Such an amazing monitor.
The "G93SC" seems to be of such high quality, but when I look at the USB-C ports from Samsung, I have to say it sucks, that means USB-C cables don't hold up and sometimes fall off again!
Dope video man!
Well out of the box this monitor has been rated almost the worst for color with factory settings. If you don't adjust it you are just looking at bad.
man i just want a 4k 240hz for under 800 what the heck bro
wtf games u play in 4k 240fps
@@w9s992 any blizzard game on low settings
So, you just plug your graphics card into the HDMI slot to get full 2.1, instead of the monitor port?
hi, outside of netflix and stuff, what do i lose going this version compared to the smart one? does it have less settings for visuals?
If more games had 32:9 support I'd buy this.
The cable your recommending has hdmi on both ends right? On this G9 OLED it has a mini hdmi 2.1 port will that cable work you linked?
hello i have a question can someone tell me i can connect it with my mac book pro??
but on the samsung website it says G93SC is OLED and G95SC is QD-OLED
Didn't you have a video on this exact monitor titled "Don't buy this"?
Must be nice being able to get good monitors for cheap. Over here this costs 1500-1600$.
Damn! This monitor is so wide! It's to wide for my desk since I have my PC on my desk and I don't want it anywhere else. But damn this is nice.
Do you buy these monitors to review and then send them back?
Basically what all UA-camrs do unless they want to keep it
@@elchancho8432 I need to start doing this lol
I play games in the dark. Is this a great choice then?
yes
That's the best case scenario for this monitor
I have a predecessor of this with an LCD panel and playing at 32:9 in the dark is the most immersive experience you can get without literally strapping the monitor to your face (aka VR)!
I have this exact monitor. I can’t get 240hz to work or to enable
hello i just subscribed and i would need the seeting for this screen could yyou please explain where i can find it on patreon ?
Could you maybe let me rent the monitor? I promise to give it back. 👉👈
Anyone here using this for MSFS? Input?
the way you have the screen placed and your filming feels like a 3d render, damm
Got the 2023 G9 OLED and its a best monitor Ive ever used.
How can I be rich like you?
@@Wickery. I mean. I got it on Black Friday deal and I have a job.
Getting mine delivered on Wednesday can’t wait!
what kind of monitors do you expect to see later this year?
What an insane machine👀
What’s the difference of between the g95sc and g93sc?
Smart features
Get LG TV C3 42 inches
Any news on the HP OMEN transcend 32?
If you could get this for $850, would you do it?
As a G9 first gen (LCD) owner, I would ABSOLUTELY recommend it at that price!
32:9 is absolutely AMAZING for games that support it and it's still a great monitor for games that just run in 16:9, plus the ability to use picture by picture and play in 21:9 with some other program open on the side or to have two 16:9 monitors in one seamless case is extremely useful to! (Just make sure this model does also support PBP if you're interested in that)
thats crazy
Got this for £806 on Prime Day but it's coming next month. They better honour the price 🥹 It's already gone up past £1000 now. Sneaky how they had no out of stock notice.
Edit: It came early! 🎉
$999 at Amazon right now. Very tempting.
Same deal ends tonight too
Reduced again
love mine
I have this monitor the ppi is so lacking & is not high enough resolution, my 4k hp spectre laptop amoled is sharper & easier on the eyes, ppi 220, you can see finer detail, with samsung g9 you can't ppi is only 110, i do have some buyers remorse.
lol welcome to monitors, they’re much larger than laptops. It’s 1440 so it’s the exact same as a 1440 27”. You’ll never get anywhere near 220 on a monitor. Best you’ll get is 163 on a 27” in 4k. All of this is mitigated by viewing distance tho.
Btw your problem isn’t the resolution, it’s the pixel layout on QD-OLED. They’re not good for text.
Wtf you need higher ppi for, lmao!
How close do you sit to your 27" x2 monitor? Cause the farther away you sit, the less ppi matters.
1440p is the best resolution for PC right now, anything higher only wastes performance and causes skaling issues on basically all OSes
@@LRM12o8 are you crazy, you don't care about beautiful graphic looking text, anybody that types needs high ppi over 200 so the text look beautiful & pristine, is necessary.
@@LRM12o8 you’re talking about a completely different thing. Viewing distance only affects seeing individual pixels. It doesn’t magically make a 109ppi monitor have the clarity/detail/sharpness of a 163ppi monitor.
I do agree that 2k is perfect for gaming tho. 4k much better for work/reading text. Scaling on 4k isn’t an issue anymore for the vast majority of users btw.
@@LRM12o8 i had a friend looked at the text, i said does it look blurry, they said yes. The text looks like garbage. It literally strains the eyes, it's actually a liability. Qd oled is an incomplete technology, it's not at its peak.
wait.. a few months ago you said ultrawide sucks and 32:9 is even more niche than 21:9
Support is absolutely terrible, but people want what they want 🤷
if more people want it, support should get better over time usually
Is there an 8k2k version?
Yes...but its Mini LED
Never understood the appeal of these stupid overly wide things.
Its quite simple...you see more horizontal space over 16:9 and 21:9 at the same vertical pixel count.
it's 2 monitors in one what's so hard to understand
Have you tried using both of your brain cells?
Nah, I hate 49 inch and with OLED seeing as so much content is 16:9 you just run the risk of burning anything else in to the damn thing. 34 inch or even 38 inch is the sweet spot of UW gaming ( or at least 21:9 ) Oh and most games have horrendous SUW support to a point everything looks really warped. Its there on 21:9 but a lot less.
Thats what mods are for.
@@5ean5ean22 am not on about 16:9 gaming, a lot of games nowadays get 21:9 and 32:9 support ( although cutscenes are still mostly 16:9 and mods help there ). I am on about how webpages are set up and youtube. You will literally not be able to watch youtube on this thing unless you want burn in very quickly. Gaming is still all fish eyed though for almost any game that does support it, very little games have great SUW support as its a niche.
ultrawide monitors are mid
"most games don't support the format, HDR brightness is terrible and worst glossy screen but....buy this now" 😑 I hate clickbait, it's so trashy
Mine is amazing you just throwing out buzzwords and don't know your anal cavity from a hole in the ground. You speak like someone who has never used oled. Cause if you had you would never want another type of display. And secondly there are a lot of games now with support for 32:9. 1515 games listed in the reddit thread and about 60% of those are listed as native 32:9 support
I hate stupidity, yet here is this comment. First point isn't true, most reviewers don't have a clue about gaming in this format I've been gaming at these ratios for over 10 years, the brightness is only bad compared to MiniLED, people actually using them are perfectly happy, he also said that even a bad glossy screen is better than any matte which is the majority of screens. There you go, maybe that will put a wrinkle on your smooth brain.
@@cenciende9401 😂
@@cenciende9401 LOL thanks for handling. I've been on one a few years now. Probably his first day on the internetz.
@cenciende9401 most games support this format??
Half the games I play don’t support 32:9 so freaking useless for me
Of course... as we all know, it cannot show any other aspect ratios 😉
@@InnocentiusLacrimosa😂
Okay so what you even doing here? Such a pointless comment.
@@absolutexk you mean such a pointless monitor
I recently got a 32:9. Before i had a 21:9 and before that it was 16:9 and before that, a 4:3 ratio. Its a niche item for a niche customer. Many people prefer the 16:9. Ive learned about myself that i very much search for wider screens. Ive reduced my setup from 3 to 2 to a 1 screen setup currently. Its a good setup if you like more single space to work on, but dont want more screens with their borders.
My Asus PG32UDCM order just went through should be here by 3/25 I’m happy
That's a neck breaker.
I am never buying these gimmicky ultra wide monitors but thank you tho