All, especially the SpaceX landings as it's incredible how rockets can be reusable. Also the last one - it's crazy how the rocket had 70 successful launches and the one to fail has 2 people on board! Luckily everyones safe
Rockets have been made much safer but still have a long ways to go. Thank goodness for an aerospace engineering community that never takes failure lying down. They always look at every piece that they pickup and learn from it. On day, large manned rockets will be as safe as todays airliners.
all living things are born to die, these missions involved many hours and great minds at work. losing these types of people is actually a devastation. not whatever you are saying@@jeandenbelg
@@aparnathakur8239 that's fair enough, however you will not see too many "Top 10 dying cases because of no food or water or medicines in their country..." kind of videos, and those are far, faaar more frequent in the everyday's Earth real life..than rocket failures.
As if this was actually a firework, hence one of the reasons why I am somewhat aversive to fireworks! (Actually I believe that the spectators mistakenly thought the rocket was staging, because it sure looked like that before the rocket disintegrated)
Thank you for the over-dramatic dialogue. I would never have guessed how horribly wrong these launches, that have been seen on so many other videos, went without the dramatic voiceover.
@@cheryllane5728 Or they thought that the rocket was staging- it looked like it at the early seconds of the explosion. You could here faint "ohs" and ceasing of clapping when they realized what was really going on!
Imagine being amongst the team of engineers that built it. You wouldn't know who to blame, and at the same time feeling terribly guilty and questioning your own abilities
As long as no one gets hurt, it would be an amazing thing to witness first hand. I wonder how far people would feel the radiant heat from the explosion. The first one was just badass.
I was at the Wallops Island Visitors Complex that night. Shocking. No one was ready for what happened... but as the head of Orbital Sciences (builder of Antares) said later that evening, "We've had a really bad night. But the good news is, we didn't kill anyone." Antares was redesigned and fitted with better engines and continues to fly to the ISS for Northrup Grumman and NASA a couple of times each year. : ]
1:54 Antares Crash of Higher Ground And The explosion was so big 5:54 The Proton-M The control Went lost and The Rocket falls the ground after that The fire Appears to to be biggest explosion 8:37 The SpaceX (Landing failed) Rocket Was Fall to Earth Because The Gas went out 10:58 Soyuz MS-10 The Rocket Failure Engine It's Broke And Crash
5:40 Baikonur Cosmodrome. Used to be the primary Soviet rocket test and launch complex. Their version of Kennedy, except it's quite a ways inland. That was definitely NOT the largest "rocket go boom" there - as all the N-1 launches were from there.
I’m surprised the challenger wasn’t in here. I mean the whole country was watching live. Its the first fatal in-flight American accident. It’s famous as a huge tragedy. A teacher dying with all the crew in front of millions of people. I mean it wasn’t really an “accident” NASA intentionally ignored the possibility of a faulty o-ring due to cold temperatures. It could have been avoided if they wait till it was warmer
But space is very cold. Are you saying it's their fault for not building rockets to handle extreme temperatures even though it is built to handle extreme temperatures XD?
@Todd Boyce The rocket boosters themselves don't go into space... The SRBs come off and fall into the Atlantic Ocean 2 minutes into the launch... They are then recovered and reused... The issue with Challenger was the O-ring didn't seal correctly due to the cold temperatures as it was going up and allowed the gasses to escape out of the gap where the O-ring was supposed to seal... The boosters themselves were not made to be able to tolerate the extremely cold temperatures and it was proven before when they recovered the SRB of previous flights and they saw the O- rings had been burned through and were a millimeter away from burning all the way through... It was very much their fault!
@@toddboyce3599 I don’t think you understand. The O-rings were meant to seal, when they expanded, like how metal expands in the summer. Because it was too cold, they didn’t expand, thus leading to the gas leaking out, the shuttle breaking and falling to the ocean floor killing the crew.once they are in space the o rings are sealed. Someone please correct if I’m wrong, but this is what I understand
8:12 They are the first conventional rockets to be at least partly re-usable. However, the Space Shuttle and Buran were also partly reusable = LONG before SpaceX or even Tesla existed.
@@Teddy-rh8vl It would be a lot more accurate to call Buran the distant cousin of the Space Shuttle, and thedistant uncle of SLS/Artemis. NOT AT ALL related to Space X, except it had a TINY amount of space experience.
@@thecyanadon The shuttle itself was reusable - and GOT reused a bunch of times each. 5 shuttles, over 120 launches. The solid fuel boosters were also partly reusable - had to be refurbished and refuelled at best though. The external fuel tank I don't think got reused. A LOT more than "show" - but it turned out that "big dumb boosters" would likely have been cheaper.
You forgot 1 that is very sad. It it the Space Shuttle that blew up about 2 minutes into flight. There was a lot of crew. All died, but 1 survived but had no parachute, and fell to the ground and died later. Worst part: She was a teacher of lots of students.
11:05, on of the attached boosters failed to jettison and caused the spacecraft to lose control. This resulted in an abort and the safety tower pulling the capsule to safety.
For the N-1 - imagine a rocket ballpark 20 TIMES bigger, 20 TIMES the fuel, 20 TIMES the boom. OR MORE. The second N-1 launch pretty much destroyed the entire launch complex it took off from - in a fairly similar timeframe after launch (engine failures except #18 out of the 31 at T+15, pad impact at T+23). It is estimated that only 15% of the fuel was part of the blast (the rest got spread out by the blast, and was STILL FALLING 3 days later!). Yet it still makes the list of the 10 biggest non-nuclear man-made explosions of all time (and a couple of those were Nuke SIMULATIONS with conventional explosions)!
It seems like we are still at early-mid age of rockets. Someone reading from future please reply when the rocket like this size has successfully land back and forth.
@@shironoyami7002 Your second sentence is not understandable - but I suspect whatever you actually meant will be met in March or April if the first Starship orbital launch is a success.
BOOM! *BOOOOM* !!!! Warms the cockles of yer heart! Warms a lot of other things, too. Huuuaaaarrrghghghg! :) :) :) 2:42 onwards was particularly pretty. 3:15 They are definitely within the top 100% in reliability. :) 4:06 "One of the reasons the rocket is so ground-breaking" ... it certainly breaks the ground when it collides with a planet which someone carelessly left lying around. 4:09 "Partially re-useable" because many of the atoms are still in pristine condition. 5:12 "This caused a rapid over-pressure event. In layman's language, *KA-BOOOOOOOOOOOOOM* !!!!!" 6:26 I like the nice peachy colour of the flames. 6:34 "The rocket had the height of a seventeen-storey building" ... not for long. 6:40 "These satellites alone were worth almost 200 million dollars" .... and a few moments later they were worth KABOOOOOOOOOOM !!!!!!
9:28 I wouldn’t exactly call it a “failure” it’s more like a “water landing” to me since it didn’t break apart and could still be recovered and reused.
Ihad a choice of space crafts since the beginning of space travel to go to space with. I would choose soyuz every single time . There record speaks for itself. Very safe craft
I will have to say the failure of the Soyuz 10,due to the fact that the two astronauts escape certain death after the separation took place and they landed safely, good to go for them.
1:00 actually the Antares wasn’t developed by nasa it was part of the commercial resupply thing like CRS or smth. It competed against SpaceX. It was made by Orbital Science Corporation.
You can definitely tell this video was years ago because, SpaceX has now had over 300 successful landings of an orbital class rocket! NOW, they have a successful orbital insertion and successful landing of a FULLY reusable superheavy booster and space craft.... STARSHIP!
Why? Only ONE of those launches had anything to do with astronauts… More importantly, only two of the rockets shown are even rated for human flight. This really isn’t an astronaut thing.
I was having a party in my garden and I lit a Standard Skyblaster. It cost £4. It went up but hit some branches and came down in Mrs Butler's allotment. I don't have a film of it.
Which one did you like the most? 😱
All
All
last one
All, especially the SpaceX landings as it's incredible how rockets can be reusable.
Also the last one - it's crazy how the rocket had 70 successful launches and the one to fail has 2 people on board! Luckily everyones safe
first one
Rockets have been made much safer but still have a long ways to go. Thank goodness for an aerospace engineering community that never takes failure lying down. They always look at every piece that they pickup and learn from it. On day, large manned rockets will be as safe as todays airliners.
until someone hijacks a rocket
The rocket industry hasn't changed since the 60s
@@bobskinnyjeans4092 you have any idea how imbred you sound?
@@trenchslayer1014You dont deserve things like a phone or gps
@@trenchslayer1014 it’s still all legit all based on von brauns work
Very happy to hear those two astronauts made it back safely.
People are dying in this world because they have no food! And then cry a little for this! What a pathetic world!
all living things are born to die, these missions involved many hours and great minds at work. losing these types of people is actually a devastation. not whatever you are saying@@jeandenbelg
@@jeandenbelg Death in both ways is horrible. No matter what the situation is.
@@jeandenbelg do you know, by writting that reply, you have emit CO2, which cause global warming that would probably kill us all in a few more years
@@aparnathakur8239 that's fair enough, however you will not see too many "Top 10 dying cases because of no food or water or medicines in their country..." kind of videos, and those are far, faaar more frequent in the everyday's Earth real life..than rocket failures.
the fact that the falcon 9 people in the background were clapping and cheering 💀
They thought it was going good
😅
As if this was actually a firework, hence one of the reasons why I am somewhat aversive to fireworks!
(Actually I believe that the spectators mistakenly thought the rocket was staging, because it sure looked like that before the rocket disintegrated)
@@jmwoods190 ah ok
._.
LOL... the guy yelling oh my God oh my God it's going to be so loud was actually louder than the rocket exploding
Nah the explosion was louder.
And God still could barely hear him over the explosion.
Thank you for the over-dramatic dialogue. I would never have guessed how horribly wrong these launches, that have been seen on so many other videos, went without the dramatic voiceover.
People really love to just whine and complain about anything, don't they?
@@lotanowohaha lol fr
@@lotanowo he's right though
I was there for antares. A minute or so after it exploded I swear you could feel the heat of it from miles away. Crazy to watch
Holy crat!
Ha. You answered my question about radiant heat. That's wild as.
no i was not there for Antares, i do not understand why youre lying.
@@anderstermansen130so you’re saying you weren’t there and that someone who was actually there is wrong?
English please@@anderstermansen130
6:09 The sound of that explosion is amazing. I mean the sound they captured is amazing. Turn it up and listen to it. oooph
4:59
Rocket: Literally explodes into steam
about 25% of people: (clap)
Lol
At least let them enjoy the fireworks my guy
They probably thought that the rockets thrusters gained power or some shit
People applauded when Challenger blew up. Thay was awkward.
@@cheryllane5728 Or they thought that the rocket was staging- it looked like it at the early seconds of the explosion. You could here faint "ohs" and ceasing of clapping when they realized what was really going on!
Each failure is a lesson learnt.
Imagine being amongst the team of engineers that built it. You wouldn't know who to blame, and at the same time feeling terribly guilty and questioning your own abilities
@@Englishsea24 spacex begs to differ
5:02 they are clapping lmao 🤣🤣 thinking that this is normal
2:00 POV: The worker after realizing that 33+77 wasn’t 100…
10:03 Guy knees the astronaut as he steps onto the ramp.😆
As long as no one gets hurt, it would be an amazing thing to witness first hand. I wonder how far people would feel the radiant heat from the explosion. The first one was just badass.
I was at the Wallops Island Visitors Complex that night. Shocking. No one was ready for what happened... but as the head of Orbital Sciences (builder of Antares) said later that evening, "We've had a really bad night. But the good news is, we didn't kill anyone." Antares was redesigned and fitted with better engines and continues to fly to the ISS for Northrup Grumman and NASA a couple of times each year. : ]
People are dying in this world because they have no food! And then cry a little for this! What a pathetic world!
@@jeandenbelgGuess what took artificial satellites to the space and made internet available for you to comment on UA-cam?
@@jeandenbelg ur pathetic
@@jeandenbelgI don't give a shete
1:54 Antares Crash of Higher Ground And The explosion was so big
5:54 The Proton-M The control Went lost and The Rocket falls the ground after that The fire Appears to to be biggest explosion
8:37 The SpaceX (Landing failed) Rocket Was Fall to Earth Because The Gas went out
10:58 Soyuz MS-10 The Rocket Failure Engine It's Broke And Crash
Do you forgot falcon 9?
6:25 I think the fuel tanks that blew up upon impact also blew up the fuel tanks that didn't hit the ground yet
6:30 RIP poor ants and insects xD
You could’ve mentioned the N1 rocket, especially the launch where the rocket crashed onto the launchpad.
5:40
Baikonur Cosmodrome.
Used to be the primary Soviet rocket test and launch complex.
Their version of Kennedy, except it's quite a ways inland.
That was definitely NOT the largest "rocket go boom" there - as all the N-1 launches were from there.
I’m surprised the challenger wasn’t in here. I mean the whole country was watching live. Its the first fatal in-flight American accident. It’s famous as a huge tragedy. A teacher dying with all the crew in front of millions of people. I mean it wasn’t really an “accident” NASA intentionally ignored the possibility of a faulty o-ring due to cold temperatures. It could have been avoided if they wait till it was warmer
But space is very cold. Are you saying it's their fault for not building rockets to handle extreme temperatures even though it is built to handle extreme temperatures XD?
@Todd Boyce The rocket boosters themselves don't go into space... The SRBs come off and fall into the Atlantic Ocean 2 minutes into the launch... They are then recovered and reused... The issue with Challenger was the O-ring didn't seal correctly due to the cold temperatures as it was going up and allowed the gasses to escape out of the gap where the O-ring was supposed to seal... The boosters themselves were not made to be able to tolerate the extremely cold temperatures and it was proven before when they recovered the SRB of previous flights and they saw the O- rings had been burned through and were a millimeter away from burning all the way through... It was very much their fault!
@@toddboyce3599 I don’t think you understand. The O-rings were meant to seal, when they expanded, like how metal expands in the summer. Because it was too cold, they didn’t expand, thus leading to the gas leaking out, the shuttle breaking and falling to the ocean floor killing the crew.once they are in space the o rings are sealed. Someone please correct if I’m wrong, but this is what I understand
Well the families of the challenger crew will sue this guy if it happened
why would it be, Challenger wasn't classified as a rocket
2:09
R.I.P Water B. Tower
you will be missed 😭
Still looks safer and cheaper than EV's. I'm sold !
2:40. Rocket blowing up
Some dude: that looks cool
6:31 it pops
Looool, Soyuz launch with no people harmed was "horribly wrong", but US Challenger and Columbia surely had minor problems 😀😀😀
Some dudes in the Antares explosion:
OH GOD, OH GOD
HOLY SH*T HOLY SH*T
Thanks to this channel for collecting these footages.
8:12
They are the first conventional rockets to be at least partly re-usable.
However, the Space Shuttle and Buran were also partly reusable = LONG before SpaceX or even Tesla existed.
Buran was something else ! Buran is basically dad to Space X 🤣
@@Teddy-rh8vl It would be a lot more accurate to call Buran the distant cousin of the Space Shuttle, and thedistant uncle of SLS/Artemis.
NOT AT ALL related to Space X, except it had a TINY amount of space experience.
Space shuttle was not exactly a valid vessel for reusability, it was more for show.
@@thecyanadon The shuttle itself was reusable - and GOT reused a bunch of times each.
5 shuttles, over 120 launches.
The solid fuel boosters were also partly reusable - had to be refurbished and refuelled at best though.
The external fuel tank I don't think got reused.
A LOT more than "show" - but it turned out that "big dumb boosters" would likely have been cheaper.
@@bricefleckenstein9666 at the end of the day, both are very important parts of human history
christopher nolan should use antares launch fail scene to create the nuclear bomb in OPPENHEIMER
I just saw the falcon 9 heavy launch the GOES-U mission and it was flawless I’ve never seen something so amazing
I think we as a species have come an amazing way as far as technology goes. We will not always get it right the first time
4:59😂😂
People cheering and clapping as they see the beautiful pyro work in the sky😂
Wow the quality of your videos is so good! You will gain much more subscribers soon :D
Agar.io idol is here!
Hi!!!!!
Thank you a lot!
@@TechWorld-tf1xj
Hi!!!!!!!!!!!
3:10 ...random silver space tape
Bro Is A Nuclear Missle💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
Proton M: *Releases quite literal death into the air*
Russians:'' Xaxaxa!''
The person that was screaming it’s gonna be loud I can’t 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Russian rocket has poison but American hasn’t haha😂
You forgot 1 that is very sad. It it the Space Shuttle that blew up about 2 minutes into flight. There was a lot of crew. All died, but 1 survived but had no parachute, and fell to the ground and died later. Worst part: She was a teacher of lots of students.
Challenger, 1986. We’ve come a long way since 1986.
People are dying in this world because they have no food! And then cry a little for this! What a pathetic world!
@@jeandenbelgdoes that apply when yo mama dies too? I mean, other people are starving, and you're crying that yo mama dead? Pathetic
@@jeandenbelglol wtf
@@jeandenbelg Pick on the military, which gets 40x what NASA gets.
Always enjoy watching musk fail
Ведь SpaceX это только Илон Маск, над ракетами же не работают сотни инженеров и они очень радуются, когда их ракеты неудачно летят
Proton rocket 7:20, yeah. This is what happens when you install a gyro upside down! Oops!
Falcon 9: * literally being burn up and slowly disapearring in the sky *
People: WOOOOO!!!! YEYWHAHAHHA
Titan 34D-9 in 1986 is one of my 'favourites'.
my baby sister said “awww poopoo!” while watching this!
0:27 A rocket breaks in thousand pieces.
Man you must have an incredible brain!
8:23 "a cold gas is released to flip the rocket"
Thats a really odd way to describe the RCS system....
😂😂
25 KILLSTREA-
If I was in one of thoses rockets I would say we’re cooked
11:05, on of the attached boosters failed to jettison and caused the spacecraft to lose control. This resulted in an abort and the safety tower pulling the capsule to safety.
People are dying in this world because they have no food! And then cry a little for this! What a pathetic world!
@@jeandenbelg???
For the N-1 - imagine a rocket ballpark 20 TIMES bigger, 20 TIMES the fuel, 20 TIMES the boom. OR MORE.
The second N-1 launch pretty much destroyed the entire launch complex it took off from - in a fairly similar timeframe after launch (engine failures except #18 out of the 31 at T+15, pad impact at T+23).
It is estimated that only 15% of the fuel was part of the blast (the rest got spread out by the blast, and was STILL FALLING 3 days later!).
Yet it still makes the list of the 10 biggest non-nuclear man-made explosions of all time (and a couple of those were Nuke SIMULATIONS with conventional explosions)!
It seems like we are still at early-mid age of rockets.
Someone reading from future please reply when the rocket like this size has successfully land back and forth.
@@shironoyami7002 Your second sentence is not understandable - but I suspect whatever you actually meant will be met in March or April if the first Starship orbital launch is a success.
BOOM! *BOOOOM* !!!! Warms the cockles of yer heart! Warms a lot of other things, too. Huuuaaaarrrghghghg! :) :) :)
2:42 onwards was particularly pretty.
3:15 They are definitely within the top 100% in reliability. :)
4:06 "One of the reasons the rocket is so ground-breaking" ... it certainly breaks the ground when it collides with a planet which someone carelessly left lying around.
4:09 "Partially re-useable" because many of the atoms are still in pristine condition.
5:12 "This caused a rapid over-pressure event. In layman's language, *KA-BOOOOOOOOOOOOOM* !!!!!"
6:26 I like the nice peachy colour of the flames.
6:34 "The rocket had the height of a seventeen-storey building" ... not for long.
6:40 "These satellites alone were worth almost 200 million dollars" .... and a few moments later they were worth KABOOOOOOOOOOM !!!!!!
@@shironoyami7002 n
Cameraman never dies
Horrible but won’t stop the endeavours
Honestly surprising how little subscribers your channel has. Here’s to one more 👍🏼
As a result of your comment I took a peep at the channel and subbed. Looks good. Thanks. Love yooooo. (I share love as life’s to short)
5:51 be like the rocket from natural disaster survival
Literaly my KSP gameplay
10:03 look they kick her ass 😂
5:18 Time to ignite the Russian Broomsticks
Its pretty funny that someone yelled “ITS GONNA BE LOUD!” In front of everybody😂😂😂😂
Amazing to watch...
Most companies would keep their mishaps and failure information mostly classified. Space X made there's into a meme montage.
9:28 I wouldn’t exactly call it a “failure” it’s more like a “water landing” to me since it didn’t break apart and could still be recovered and reused.
Water landing are still a little bit dangerous, some rockets are not water ready at all.
remember toxic chemicals added in the rocket could react differently in the water
Kidding right? Let's see...what was different about this landing from the previous 12? Please do not pursue a career in quality control.
When a booster lands in the water it is never reusable.
@@thecyanadon Except the fact they did it with the space shuttle boosters
Ihad a choice of space crafts since the beginning of space travel to go to space with. I would choose soyuz every single time . There record speaks for itself. Very safe craft
I think i saw Falcon 9 from my car i remember seeing something white in the sky that was coming down to Earth really fast
10:10 “at 9am in the morning”. As opposed to 9am in the afternoon, presumably.
The water tower was a paid actor 2:08
I like how I started watching Succession a month ago and this got recommended to me today lol
Antares was developed by Orbital ATK. (Which was then bought by Northrup Grumman.) NASA *uses* it, but they definitely didn't develop it.
6:20 The russian thought it would be a nuke
lol
4:50 why did those idiots start cheering and clapping when it blew up
They must’ve thought it sped up or something lmao then it just disappeared💀
They probably thought it was stage separation
I will have to say the failure of the Soyuz 10,due to the fact that the two astronauts escape certain death after the separation took place and they landed safely, good to go for them.
1:00 actually the Antares wasn’t developed by nasa it was part of the commercial resupply thing like CRS or smth. It competed against SpaceX. It was made by Orbital Science Corporation.
You can definitely tell this video was years ago because, SpaceX has now had over 300 successful landings of an orbital class rocket! NOW, they have a successful orbital insertion and successful landing of a FULLY reusable superheavy booster and space craft.... STARSHIP!
the guy going oh god, oh god, oh god🤣
That nitrogen thrusters: SURVIVE...ok nevermin-
Proton : the "navigational assembly" which was installed upside down was a gyroscope. The rocket didn't know which way it was going.
4:56 they all be clapping and cheering at the astronauts deaths
0:18 Steve Carell was warning everybody👏
The Unmanned rocket is a actually bomb luckily no one died I think maybe hopefully not tho
7:24 is the best part. Its kind of quiet, so if you use a device without headphones, you should probably max the volume.
I often 🤔 wonder why NASA and others don't use rocket sleds and rail ramps.
Probably not enough power or to many weak points at that angle but I’m no scientist
A very exciting explosion for the falcon nine
This is Astronaut Nightmares.
Why? Only ONE of those launches had anything to do with astronauts… More importantly, only two of the rockets shown are even rated for human flight. This really isn’t an astronaut thing.
I was having a party in my garden and I lit a Standard Skyblaster. It cost £4. It went up but hit some branches and came down in Mrs Butler's allotment. I don't have a film of it.
Wonderfully explained. Super. Thanks. 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼❤❤❤❤❤❤
The one at wallops was insane
Now I know from where Christopher Nolan has taken mega blasts for oppenheimer!!
10:03 this is the exact moment a astronaut gets slapped in his cheeks
6:31 I kinda feel the jolt as it touches the ground and exploded
1:15 Antares rocket
NASA didn't develop the Antares.
I'd say they look just like all the spectacular launch failures throughout history, only in color.
Well actually, this was the Soyuz second launch failure. Look up Soyuz T10a
3:25 Elon Once Said:Failure Is The Stair To Success
CGI is just Awesome.
This is the best firecrackers ever i saw
well now I don’t wanna be an astronaut. I’ll stick with atleast NASAs receptionist
I’ll stick with Titanic worker
Brought to you by the Kerbal Space Program.
I like yo7 videos keep up the good work
The thumbnail said It all 💀 didn't even have to read the title to know that its accidents but i didn't know that it is rocket accidents
5:30 this one looked like it, burned up in the atmosphere before hitting the ground
Old footage SpaceX now lands em all.