Can a Hearthstone Player Guess if a Yugioh card is FAKE?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 987

  • @Malao558
    @Malao558 Рік тому +1408

    A small note on the Barrier Statue and Eradicating Aerosol: DIVINE is in all caps because it’s an attribute (like how Blue-Eyes is a LIGHT monster) but Insect is in normal caps because it’s a creature type (like how Blue-Eyes is a Dragon)

    • @mauer1
      @mauer1 Рік тому +13

      he means divine-beast which is a creature type.
      but INSECTS should be all cap aswell

    • @DoomBringerTGC
      @DoomBringerTGC Рік тому +232

      @@mauer1 Insects absolutely shouldn't be all caps. Same as how Divine-Beast shouldn't be all caps. DIVINE should.

    • @TheUltimateShade667
      @TheUltimateShade667 Рік тому +73

      @@mauer1 Yeah but it doesn't say divine-beast. It says Divine.

    • @pokedude583
      @pokedude583 Рік тому +80

      I think the confusion probably comes from their being a DIVINE attribute and a Divine-Beast type. If you don't realise they both exist, and that attributes are all caps, it would look out of place.

    • @waiyon1951
      @waiyon1951 Рік тому +54

      @@mauer1 only attributes are in all caps WATER, FIRE, LIGHT, DARK, WIND, EARTH and DIVINE monster types are not.

  • @originalindigodingo
    @originalindigodingo Рік тому +755

    Pot of Egotism as a name makes sense to me. The card is so self absorbed that it demands you only play Pot of Egotism for the rest of the duel, and no other spells.

    • @Xfighter22
      @Xfighter22 Рік тому +58

      Oo good take! I was also thinking it fits cuz like the person playing it has such a big ego they go "Who needs spell cards anyway? I'll win with just monsters" 😂

    • @ragingkiller3436
      @ragingkiller3436 Рік тому

      It's the rest of the turn not duel

    • @Depressed_Spider
      @Depressed_Spider Рік тому +40

      @@ragingkiller3436 Nope, for the rest of the duel.

    • @Kentanimationnnnnnnnn
      @Kentanimationnnnnnnnn Рік тому +9

      The real card in rush duel is just the rest of the turn though. Think that card almost toed the line.

    • @aboogala4678
      @aboogala4678 Рік тому +14

      ​@@Xfighter22Superheavy Samurai has entered the chat

  • @mooncalf_4534
    @mooncalf_4534 Рік тому +344

    He didn't put enough of our legendary cards like Interplanetarypurplythornydragon or anteatereatingant or dr. frankenderp. Or any of the great absurdly long names like number 81: super dreadnoughtrailcannon super dora, training fur hire; fur all your training needs, or super anti-kaiju war machine mechathunderking... Or wolf.

    • @VVheeli
      @VVheeli Рік тому +61

      I’d love for him to pull out the insanity that is YGO’s vanilla monsters. Like you cannot tell me those cards were not copied directly from DnD manuals and even nicher things.
      Hittem with Shapesnatch, go Aqua Mador and Neo Aqua Mador back to back, Trent, Dark Witch who is a LIGHT Fairy for some reason, or just Jellyfish.

    • @danielhughes6556
      @danielhughes6556 Рік тому +25

      Bat my beloved.

    • @crystalbreaker947
      @crystalbreaker947 Рік тому +5

      Don't forget ma boi LOUIS!

    • @Lawler50431
      @Lawler50431 Рік тому +6

      ​@@VVheeli There's a reason for Dark Witch being a LIGHT Fairy... the TCG chose a HORRIBLE name, and this seemed to happen a lot in the early days. The OCG name for the card is Valkyrie! Same with Dunames Dark Witch (Dunamis Valkyria in OCG) whose 3 "retrains" all used Valkyria in their names (Dark Valkyria, Chaos Valkyria and Power Angel Valkyria).

    • @Robin93k
      @Robin93k Рік тому +1

      ​@@VVheeliAlso all of the Cocoon of Evolution related cards starting with Ultimate and ending in Larvae.

  • @Flygoniaks
    @Flygoniaks Рік тому +188

    [10:55] For those who are still confused as to how the hell this is supposed to work: It's a linear equation in the form of (Y = M*X + B).
    B is the number of cards your opponent controls, M is the level of the chosen monster, Y is the number of cards in your graveyard, and X is the number you declared.
    If you activate this card and declare an "X" such that (Y = M*X + B) _is a true statement,_ you're greatly rewarded for it. If you did your math wrong, you lose Life Points.
    This is absolutely one of my favorite "joke cards" in all of Yu-Gi-Oh's history, because of just how absurd the premise is.

    • @RavenCloak13
      @RavenCloak13 Рік тому +2

      Oh thank you.

    • @shuttlecrossing7084
      @shuttlecrossing7084 Рік тому +11

      Think of it like B for Baddies (Your opponent's cards), M for Monster, Y for graveYard, and X for a variable of your choice.

    • @snowboundwhale6860
      @snowboundwhale6860 Рік тому +8

      Props to anyone who can bait their opponent into dropping D.D. Crow by activating this card when your Y is 1 too high. I imagine it can be done simply based off people not wanting to do the maths and assuming you already did.

    • @laytonjr6601
      @laytonjr6601 11 місяців тому +1

      1) the chances of having M and X such that the equation becomes correct is absurd
      2) the reward isn't even that good if you declare 1 or 2

    • @matasa7463
      @matasa7463 8 місяців тому +1

      You know what they should do as a reprint errata?
      Just fucking make the effect into a math question.
      Just literally show the equation, tell them to solve it.

  • @Niitroxyde
    @Niitroxyde Рік тому +833

    Man whoever got the idea of the C archetype, thank you. This shit is funny as hell. (And whoever got the idea for the "Negotiating with the C" card especially)

    • @shadou1234567
      @shadou1234567 Рік тому +82

      but please leave Max "C" banned tho.

    • @TrueBladeSoul
      @TrueBladeSoul Рік тому +37

      @@shadou1234567 but it’s so funny when your opponent maxx c’s you when your playing trickstars

    • @KieraQ0323
      @KieraQ0323 Рік тому +7

      It's not funny when I play bad decks and I have to special summon 14 times to get out my boss monster.

    • @sqfzerzefsdf
      @sqfzerzefsdf Рік тому +4

      @@KieraQ0323 a deck running max c isn't gonna let bad decks do anything with or without it

    • @r3zaful
      @r3zaful Рік тому +1

      ​@@KieraQ0323that bad deck can run like 12 Maxx c preventor like ash to droll.

  • @v1nceifhewenttothesun682
    @v1nceifhewenttothesun682 Рік тому +225

    Negotiating with the C gotta be one of the most creative fan made cards regarding art work and effect. Props to the guy who made it.

    • @rafflez8961
      @rafflez8961 Рік тому +5

      @@MasterQuestMaster negotiating c isnt a card?

  • @elbardo_lux
    @elbardo_lux Рік тому +624

    I haven't finished the video but it would be hilarious if all cards were real just to mess with rarran.

    • @martinprince8253
      @martinprince8253 Рік тому +33

      Close enough

    • @TheMattVis
      @TheMattVis Рік тому +1

      Just like what JonTron does at Goop videos lol

    • @eddmario
      @eddmario 6 місяців тому +1

      Haven't even gotten past the third card and all I can say is that knowing this game, all of these cards could be real

  • @NewtBannner
    @NewtBannner Рік тому +164

    The “No it’s not” at the end really hit hard 😂 long gone are the days of Spellcasters vs Dragons

  • @Agreel
    @Agreel Рік тому +242

    Interesting you didn't mention the Castle of Dark Illusions' stats. Usually ATK and DEF end with "00", sometimes with "50", there's a very few cards that end with a different number. Because of that, you could immediately think this card's fake.

    • @zaer-ezart
      @zaer-ezart Рік тому +15

      That was my logic as well

    • @draconicepic4124
      @draconicepic4124 Рік тому +3

      Reaper of the Cards would like to have a word with you.

    • @scoutbane1651
      @scoutbane1651 Рік тому +41

      ​@@draconicepic4124Yes one of the like 3 cards out of the 10k that has a stat line like thatt. Good job you really did something there.

    • @N12015
      @N12015 Рік тому +12

      I would think the card was fake if it wasn't because of being part of the biggest cheating moment in the YGO history.

    • @kloaf1131
      @kloaf1131 Рік тому +2

      The entire first season is qhi can make up the most insane rules

  • @ScarDDT
    @ScarDDT Рік тому +1303

    saying pot of greed is “arguably not that good right now” is the wildest yugioh take i’ve ever heard

    • @ertawanderer1062
      @ertawanderer1062 Рік тому +210

      Indeed, The only time that pot of greed will not be good is if they make better cards and they become standard. Every single deck in the entire game would run it at max . Maybe a few whose engine is too big to fit It wouldn't but that is the only exception

    • @ScarDDT
      @ScarDDT Рік тому +174

      @@ertawanderer1062 hell, even if i had access to better draw cards, i’m STILL throwing in pot of greed. having 3x that let me draw 3 still wont stop me from having another 3x that let me draw 2.

    • @skeletonwar4445
      @skeletonwar4445 Рік тому +117

      ​@@ScarDDTYeah lmao. Even if there were better draw cards, you'd still play PoG to draw into those better draw cards...

    • @mrfatmancory
      @mrfatmancory Рік тому +154

      Yeah I've noticed this guy tends to say "This card is super ultra trash" or "This card is super ultra broken" with no in-between. Guy just has no sense of scale on anything.

    • @ertawanderer1062
      @ertawanderer1062 Рік тому +78

      @@mrfatmancory Even with that in mind, he's talking about pot of greed. That card has been justifiably banned for two decades

  • @Corrupted
    @Corrupted Рік тому +100

    One thing I love about the LSD-trip-type card design of konami is the weird micro-stories they create, they create some random ass creature and then add interactions and situations that would fit in that microcosm - I was 100% sure Negotiating with the C was real lmao, the artwork is really sick too

    • @r3zaful
      @r3zaful Рік тому +14

      Vaylanyz : why my monster turns into a trap card?
      Cardian : why are you playing hanafuda in yugioh?
      Purely : why we are playing tamagochi in yugioh?
      Suship : literally selling sushi

    • @nerotore
      @nerotore Рік тому

      Also dich hab ich hier nicht erwartet

  • @Sipricy
    @Sipricy Рік тому +61

    5:14 They didn't mess up the text of Eradicating Aerosol. Monster TYPES are written with the first letter of each word capitalized (Insect, Pyro, Beast-Warrior, etc.), but Monster ATTRIBUTES have the entire word capitalized (FIRE, WATER, DIVINE, etc.). The cards are consistent.

    • @MrShaggy524
      @MrShaggy524 Рік тому +9

      game is as consistent as Stevie consistently with the worst takes in the community

    • @laytonjr6601
      @laytonjr6601 11 місяців тому +3

      ​@@MrShaggy524"Pot of Greed isn't that good right now" as if people wouldn't play 3 Upstart Goblin if they were allowed

    • @Dwerynith
      @Dwerynith 6 місяців тому +1

      @@laytonjr6601 they are allowed, and they don't

  • @chunkitliem3635
    @chunkitliem3635 Рік тому +49

    Notes on the card bonfire, the original card name of the card is 篝火, and 篝火 can be translated into 2 similar meanings, one of that is similar to bonfire, and the other one is basically torches that fixed on wall. The word 篝 means the container made by iron stripes and 火 translate to fire. This is why the card art looks so confusing

    • @stock_movie1875
      @stock_movie1875 5 місяців тому

      And technically the object used is a fire BASKET. Which is a type of bonfire-esque object used in warfare to light arrows and other projectiles on fire without having to carry a torch and do it one at a time

  • @hugomendoza5665
    @hugomendoza5665 Рік тому +241

    I was 300% certain linear equation cannon was just a fake card made by a math major or something. I honestly can't believe it's real xD

    • @chazconkey5888
      @chazconkey5888 Рік тому +48

      I only know it was real because I tried to make Lightsworn Linear equation cannon work

    • @satibel
      @satibel Рік тому +6

      tbh it's just that the fake card makers work there and can implement them in game.

    • @bki9840
      @bki9840 Рік тому +32

      A math major would have made partial differential equation cannon at least.

    • @stegotops7415
      @stegotops7415 Рік тому +19

      The fact that it said “whole number” made me think it was fake, because no other card I can think of specifies non-fractions lol

    • @luigifan4585
      @luigifan4585 Рік тому +12

      @@stegotops7415 they probably made it whole number just to reduce the complexity/headaches in a duel if somebody actually decided to seriously play it

  • @RaphaBaruffi
    @RaphaBaruffi Рік тому +201

    These videos could be more interesting if they had some specific theme. Like only show cards for one archetype, or focus on all the pot cards, all the twister variations. That would make the game a little more playable since there would be context around the cards

  • @personsomeone2760
    @personsomeone2760 Рік тому +84

    Welcome to inferity. You dont need to play phantom hand if you set your monsters face down in the spell n trap zone and hope the oppenet doesnt ask questions

    • @GRtogetaBIC
      @GRtogetaBIC Рік тому +1

      Which beg the question. Did they do it? And how would you discover their cheat without spell/trap destruction/banishment effects?

    • @inspectormich7637
      @inspectormich7637 Рік тому +12

      ​@@GRtogetaBIC people did do this, obviously if you have the removal they would get a dq or warning, but im pretty sure people would get away with it if they didn't reveal sets upon winning. I guess maybe you could ask a judge to check but that would give away info

    • @israeldelarosa5461
      @israeldelarosa5461 Рік тому +20

      ⁠​⁠@@GRtogetaBICHell I did this. Though I was a little kid and just played against my brother when I was young.
      As for the cheat thing. In tournaments, whenever they would be forced to show their Backrow, players would just INSTANTLY scoop instead so the cheating wouldn’t be found out. And while you can claim this makes cheating obvious, they’ll still have benefit of the doubt thanks to cards not actually being revealed and thus won’t be disqualified.

  • @anypost8706
    @anypost8706 Рік тому +24

    To clarify on eradicating aerosol: Yes, insects (specifically parasite paranoid and perfectly ultimate great moth) were definitely broken in speed duels. For a very long time actually, even through a skill errata

  • @fjiturralde
    @fjiturralde Рік тому +191

    Pot of egotism doesnt exist, however, the card art actually exists in rush duel. Its called pot of arrogance

    • @Talguy21
      @Talguy21 Рік тому +28

      The English name for that card isn't official, since it's a Rush Duel card. Technically this is a valid translation of the Japanese. The effect is very similar too, except the Rush Duel card only prevents spells for the rest of the turn, not the duel.

    • @mb10637
      @mb10637 Рік тому +3

      Sekkas light is a better example in the original game

    • @Matthew-bm7xh
      @Matthew-bm7xh Рік тому

      @@Talguy21 wdym Technically? It's got the same naming convention as every other pot card, it's the correct translation

    • @Talguy21
      @Talguy21 Рік тому +5

      @@Matthew-bm7xh I mean that there's multiple ways you could translate Arrogance/Egotism/etc, and that until it gets officially localized anything with appropriate meaning could technically be correct.

    • @Matthew-bm7xh
      @Matthew-bm7xh Рік тому

      @@Talguy21 Arrogance is literally the main translation of the word used on the card

  • @Danothyus1
    @Danothyus1 Рік тому +23

    just saying whoever made the art for negotiating with the C deserves to be on the yu-gi-oh art team, because that shit looks legit as hell.

  • @tibalt966
    @tibalt966 Рік тому +132

    Learning that the “C” are cockroaches makes me feel so stupid because I always thought Maxx C was the cabinet with the DVD player lmao

    • @Grimjr7
      @Grimjr7 Рік тому +31

      If you want to know what they look like, look up the card
      Shiny Black "C" Squadder

    • @americantoastman7296
      @americantoastman7296 Рік тому +7

      bruh no way 😂

    • @r3zaful
      @r3zaful Рік тому +11

      ​@@Grimjr7their mech is
      Super Armored Robot Armed Iron Black c.
      And they utilize their mech in the hiding c.

    • @zaer-ezart
      @zaer-ezart Рік тому +3

      ​@@Grimjr7bruh and here I thought they were some black fluffy balls of fur

    • @Envy_May
      @Envy_May Рік тому +4

      and that the concept of the effect is the cards you're drawing are swarming out of hiding

  • @Gravitysonic0
    @Gravitysonic0 Рік тому +52

    I knew Negotiating with the "C" was fake because it's a counter to Maxx "C" and konami would ABSOLUTELY NEVER print something like that

    • @dappersquidman6317
      @dappersquidman6317 Рік тому +6

      except it absolutely doesn’t???

    • @Felnal
      @Felnal Рік тому +15

      It doesn't, though? All "Negotiating with the "C""'s effect does is stop both players from adding cards from the deck to the hand with means other than drawing them.

    • @stock_movie1875
      @stock_movie1875 5 місяців тому

      @@Felnal which is a hard counter to maxx "c". It's effect literally let's you add cards from deck to hand. That's it.

    • @Felnal
      @Felnal 5 місяців тому +1

      @@stock_movie1875 "...stop both players from adding cards from the deck to the hand with means *other than drawing them* ." Maxx "C" drawing the cards is exactly why it's not affected by this hypothetical effect.

    • @stock_movie1875
      @stock_movie1875 5 місяців тому

      @@Felnal by that logic then any search card is just drawing them and this type of effect which actually exists wouldn't work. You might wanna learn what it means to draw a card. Actually I will teach you.
      Drawing means you draw from the TOP OF YOUR DECK FACE DOWN.
      What maxx c does is ADD a card which means you get to look at the cards in your deck and choose one no matter where it is in the deck.

  • @mihaimorar2043
    @mihaimorar2043 Рік тому +24

    So about the difference between Aerosol and the Barrier Statue: Completely normal. Attributes are always written in all caps, while types only have the first letter capitalized

  • @phoenixeye4610
    @phoenixeye4610 Рік тому +167

    Impossible challenge: make Stevie say something positive about YuGiOh. Also pot of greed would still be played in just about every deck if they took it of the bannlist, it’s still broken

    • @kenja0685
      @kenja0685 Рік тому +36

      Let's review the banlists:
      TCG Pot of Desires 2.
      OCG Prosperity 1.
      MD Extravanga 2.
      TCG Upstart Goblin to 1.
      But yeah, Konami is definitely down with Pot of Greed coming back to 1. Good line of thinking Stevie. Drawing cards just ain't that good.

    • @Pihutihutihutijay
      @Pihutihutihutijay Рік тому +17

      The argument against pot of greed, is mostly that there is no reason to not play pot of greed. There are plenty of cards in yu-gi-oh that are straight +1 without any real drawback, but they at least require building a deck in a specific way to get the full benefit.

    • @dsamurai4725
      @dsamurai4725 Рік тому +2

      He just said its not the best card, still probably in the top 10 to 20 cards ever made

    • @christophermejia2167
      @christophermejia2167 Рік тому +26

      ​@@dsamurai4725 he didn't say "it's not the best" - he said "it's arguably not that good anymore" that is wrong

    • @dsamurai4725
      @dsamurai4725 Рік тому +1

      @@christophermejia2167 he said it's arguably not that good right now. With a lot of completely op cards around, pot of greed would comparatively not be the best right now. It would still be played everywhere if there was no ban list.

  • @GodzillaFreak
    @GodzillaFreak Рік тому +45

    Egotism is way better than sekka's light tf? It says rest of the duel so you can use spells before this, and it doesn't lock you from using traps so it's just always better than extrav in a lot of trap decks. If you're deck has

    • @tristanreymendoza2402
      @tristanreymendoza2402 Рік тому +17

      I actually think egotism would be a goodcard lmao. Idk what stevie was on when he said it was a worse sekka’s light

    • @delta3244
      @delta3244 Рік тому +2

      Playing it alongside other spells would be awkward for the possibility of drawing said other spells off it, but the option is certainly nice - and as you point out, drawing exactly 1 unplayable spell after activating Egotism essentially makes Egotism into Upstart, which isn't horrible. SL has its GY effect, Egotism has no Trap lock. Those are the main benifits of the cards. They simply belong in different decks - monster pile for SL, traps with Egotism (and you can arguably pair it with some spells). I would not call either better than the other, because the one that sees more play would always be cardpool/metagame dependant. That said, I do see the argument for calling Egotism better in a vacuum.

    • @monkeylemur
      @monkeylemur Рік тому +16

      @@tristanreymendoza2402Stevie doesn't really play YGO I think. His knowledge is pretty outdated and wrong like 90% of the time. His analysis videos were so laughably bad and just straight up incorrect info most of the time. Shame that he seems to be close to Rarran, cuz the anti-YGO propaganda is just gonna go even more haywire

    • @jofx4051
      @jofx4051 Рік тому

      ​@@tristanreymendoza2402Egotism is real card but it is on rush duel and the effect is:
      REQUIREMENT] During a turn you have not activated a Spell Card.
      [EFFECT] Draw 2 cards. If you do, you cannot activate Spell Cards until the end of this turn.

  • @cloudstrife532220
    @cloudstrife532220 Рік тому +30

    I’m surprised Rarran didn’t think Castle was fake because of the weird point values.

    • @LazurBeemz
      @LazurBeemz Рік тому +3

      But 1000/1000 is a suspicious statline!

  • @smokinbonez420
    @smokinbonez420 Рік тому +116

    I love rarran yugioh content, seeing this insane ass game from an outside perspective is always refreshing

    • @ShyRanger
      @ShyRanger Рік тому

      If you ever want to binge, there's a lot of similar videos from MTG players guessing Yugioh cards. Just search MTG player Yugioh and you'll get a good chunk.

    • @WilliFR
      @WilliFR Рік тому +1

      Indeed

  • @TrueNargin
    @TrueNargin Рік тому +21

    I literally had to stand up and take a moment to take in what I just heard after Stevie said that a card called "Linear Equation Cannon" with that monstrosity of a card effect is actually unironically a Yu-Gi-Oh card.
    Also my thought process for "Weather Report" was about like this: "This art is so incredibly obviously fake that is has to be a real card with 100% certainty".

  • @shadowstep1375
    @shadowstep1375 Рік тому +124

    I love how he says pot of greed is arguably not that good in modern yu-gi-oh with complete sincerity. Like what? Pot of greed would literally be in every deck if it was brought back.

    • @trancepeirce3107
      @trancepeirce3107 Рік тому +6

      Not every deck, for the same reason decks don't all play 3 Upstart Goblin. For meta archetypes that have abundant fuel, you'd rather see a hand trap going turn 2.

    • @shadowstep1375
      @shadowstep1375 Рік тому +33

      @@trancepeirce3107 you mean a hand trap that pot of greed may draw into? It’s not at all like upstart since it basically acts as two without any downside. Most decks in master duel still run 3 maxx c which at worst is an upstart and turn skip against most decks. To say pot of greed wouldn’t be meta is crazy.

    • @trancepeirce3107
      @trancepeirce3107 Рік тому +9

      @@shadowstep1375 Nope, you want handtraps as your turn 0 draw 5. They work as interruption which can potentially prevent your opponent from going +10. Way better than +2. TCG and MD is still catching up to the OCGs meta, so first vs second turn is still important. You'd also prefer Maxx C on hand when forced to go second. It's a hand trap not a deck trap.

    • @Ricozaza
      @Ricozaza Рік тому +26

      @@trancepeirce3107there’s no one you can argue that pot of greed wouldn’t be in every deck. It’s literally a free plus 2 without any downsides. Free cards to get more cards. There’s no argument you can have that makes not getting free cards viable. Every other pot is limited or banned in someway in every format. One without any negatives will be in every deck hands down.

    • @trancepeirce3107
      @trancepeirce3107 Рік тому +13

      @@Ricozaza It's very easy to argue from a qualifying position against definitive statements like 'every deck' or 'any downsides' and 'no argument'. I just need one single example and your statements become false.
      For one deck example, even without mentioning some gimmick archetype, there are no banlist tournaments where half the decklists and usually the winner will not include pot in favor of more handtraps. Tear cards for example go for above +2 anyway so you'd rather mill one of those. So I can argue that pot wouldnt be in atleast one deck. That's one of your statements that's false.
      For downsides or negatives, understand that pot needs to be played on your turn in order to draw a handtrap. If you go second, pot is a temperory dead card. A downside over live handtraps. More so if your opponent setup a spell negate. So that's one argument, downside, and negative, so those statements have become false.
      For pots being banned, other cards like change of heart have been unbanned. So cards being banned does not conclude that a card will be in 'every' deck if unbanned. The limited pots aren't in every deck, so that's not part of the logic either. In fact many bans is to stop specific archetypes from becoming too strong. Sky Striker would benefit alot from multiple cycling pots and jars. Maxx C for example is not banned in all formats despite benefiting 'most' decks. So that's another statement proven false.
      Your final conclusion built on earlier false statement is therefore also false.

  • @AkaAkoVT
    @AkaAkoVT Рік тому +29

    If my memory's right, Castle of Dark Illusions has such weird stats due to a gimmick in the manga, where "terrain advantage" boosted attack and defense by, like, 30% or a weird number like that.

    • @professional.commentator
      @professional.commentator Рік тому +4

      Yea isn't it like one of the few Yu-Gi-Oh cards that doesn't have a 0 in the tens place?

    • @MrGhosta5
      @MrGhosta5 Рік тому +6

      Early Yugioh wasn't really concerned about the actual rules of the game. The focus was on putting Yugi in a seemingly unwinnable situation only for him to find a creative solution at the last moment. Yugi was originally going to play a variety of games aswell so the writers didn't find it time effective to write a comprehensive list of rules for a game that was only going to be played for a couple of episodes. Dungeon Dice Monsters is a good example of how each game was going to have it's own rules and be it's own self contained story.

    • @AkaAkoVT
      @AkaAkoVT Рік тому

      There's seven!~ Five used by "Panik" in the anime, one random dinosaur, and a single card that ends in a 1 (due to an anime moment much later on)@@professional.commentator

    • @pyrotempestwing
      @pyrotempestwing Рік тому +2

      You are correct. This specific Field Bonus wasn’t in the manga. Castle had 4/1200/2500 stats in the manga. This applies to his other monsters, too in similar fashion.

    • @AkaAkoVT
      @AkaAkoVT Рік тому

      It's honestly fascinating to read about. Makes me wonder why they felt the need to change it in the early anime. Not that 1200/2500 would have been much better, but hey, less weird math involved.@@pyrotempestwing

  • @Meridianblood
    @Meridianblood Рік тому +8

    7:09 He said pot of greed is not that good while upstart is still limited. Also if Egotism exist, it'll probably still used in a deck where spell isn't that important.

  • @spaghettioverlord3247
    @spaghettioverlord3247 11 місяців тому +4

    This dude said “pot of greed wouldn’t be that good right now” and thought he could get away with it.

  • @multimate
    @multimate Рік тому +62

    Literally burst out laughing as soon as Lineer Equation Cannon appeared. I don't know a lot of modern yugioh, but this one always makes me laugh.

    • @TheSpecialPsycho
      @TheSpecialPsycho Рік тому +1

      The fact that someone could be crazy enough to pull that off too & it would turn heads at a Yugioh event would be amazing. - So many people would bow out at that moment too. "Nope, I'm not messing with that chick"

    • @trancepeirce3107
      @trancepeirce3107 Рік тому

      Seems easier to play than Small World.

    • @jofx4051
      @jofx4051 Рік тому

      There are some intentionally bad cards Konami always created, most likely as joke cards

  • @matiaspereyra9392
    @matiaspereyra9392 Рік тому +15

    I want negotiating with the c to be real, the artwork is so good

  • @NotCron
    @NotCron Рік тому +208

    Dude its actually crazy how consistent stevie is with having just absolutely wrong takes

    • @BoxWizard
      @BoxWizard Рік тому +47

      He also just likes to shit on the game. Which is funny cus w/o it no one would know who he is.

    • @AnonEcho98
      @AnonEcho98 Рік тому +81

      Yeah, it's baffling how he called a free +2 like Pot of Greed a bad card.

    • @eugenideddis
      @eugenideddis Рік тому +20

      ⁠@@AnonEcho98+1, and this is basically Droll format, but if you’re getting Drolled you’re getting Drolled, its not going to make your turn any worse that they Drolled PoG instead of any other card in your hand.

    • @doublereel-real
      @doublereel-real Рік тому +15

      ​​@@AnonEcho98I think he was referring to the purrely draw 6 combo, but even purrely would play POG.

    • @sqfzerzefsdf
      @sqfzerzefsdf Рік тому +8

      @@BoxWizard I imagine there's a correlation between him having the worst takes and his desire to shit on the game he clearly doesn't understand

  • @maitreshifu12
    @maitreshifu12 Рік тому +8

    at the point where there’s a card that offers your opponent a handshake to equalize life points, any card can be real in this game

  • @ItsSvetsi
    @ItsSvetsi Рік тому +5

    Yugioh is such a weirdly designed game that once you've seen a decent amount of cards you realise that literally anything could be real. Crazy OP effect? possible. HORRIBLE effect? possible. Art style seems super weird? Possible. Super inconsistent literally everything? Possible.
    Yugioh is one of the most insane games from a design pov. It's genuinely funny.

  • @breadeater1194
    @breadeater1194 Рік тому +5

    Mischief of the Time Goddess is in the category of "OG anime card that was so ridiculous it took them 15 years to figure out how to put it in the IRL game"

  • @StriderYGO
    @StriderYGO Рік тому +79

    it is very unfortunate that Stevie is the YGO representation, but I guess we deserve it somewhat

    • @ea8455
      @ea8455 Рік тому

      Why do people hate him

    • @defectivesickle5643
      @defectivesickle5643 Рік тому +29

      ​@@ea8455He spent the entirety of this video doing nothing but reinforcing Rarran's beliefs on the game on it being a dumpster-fire.

    • @ArokhXIII
      @ArokhXIII Рік тому +10

      @@defectivesickle5643 well...cause...it kinda is?

    • @Maruhodo
      @Maruhodo Рік тому +9

      @@ArokhXIII ever heard about the phrase "if you dont have nice thing to say, dont say at all"?

    • @benito1620
      @benito1620 Рік тому +14

      ​@@ArokhXIIIit kinda is bad, but Stevie is willing to outright lie to make it seem even worse, because he is a spiteful mutant.
      I trash talk Konami's mistakes all the time but Stevie outclassess me in that field yet somehow he is the yugiog rep.

  • @Fabboi_unl
    @Fabboi_unl Рік тому +7

    Props to Whoever designed "Negotiating with the "C""
    was 100% sure this would be real, based on the artwork alone

  • @moonsalibi
    @moonsalibi Рік тому +31

    Stevie smoking something saying Pot of Greed isnt the best card. Its free card advantage in a game where cards are basically the only resource. It helps basically reduce your deck size, which is huge in yugioh

    • @DJFracus
      @DJFracus Рік тому +3

      things like Magical Scientist warp formats a lot more, yeah Pot of Greed is free upside, but so is Scientist except the upside is "win the game"

    • @Bennime_Once
      @Bennime_Once Рік тому +16

      Pot of Greed is not the best card in the game. But calling it not that great right now like stevie did was definetly wrong.

    • @moonsalibi
      @moonsalibi Рік тому +1

      @@Bennime_Once What other card is an instant 3-of in literally any possible deck.

    • @Bennime_Once
      @Bennime_Once Рік тому +5

      @@moonsalibi graceful charity. The downside of discarding 2 isn't really a downside nowadays. MAXX C is also better than PoG. And I'm just talking about generic cards. Like DJFracus said cards like scientist would completely break the game. There are are cards on the banlist that can never comeback cause they are to broken. Pot of greed doesn't break the game.

    • @wolfwolf7152
      @wolfwolf7152 Рік тому

      @@moonsalibi how can you say this when some decks cant even run the other pots cause of limited deckspace

  • @metheguy1232
    @metheguy1232 Рік тому +8

    fun fact: because weather report exists, EVERY card printed that mentions the battle phase has to say each battle phase

    • @delta3244
      @delta3244 Рік тому +3

      It and An Unfortunate Report

  • @megustAslagt
    @megustAslagt Рік тому +12

    Town twister sounds like a really fun tech card. Especially if you can target S/T anywhere on the field and then be able to destroy a monster on the other side in the same column. Though there are ofc better options that do sth similar

    • @therranolleo468
      @therranolleo468 Рік тому +2

      Would've been a nice tech options against Mekknights

    • @IamGrimalkin
      @IamGrimalkin Рік тому

      I actually think it wasn't printed specifically because there aren't better options.
      The card hard powercreeps MST.
      MST has been soft powercrept already, but there are still arguments for playing it that would be removed by this card.

  • @DarkWarrior0175
    @DarkWarrior0175 Рік тому +8

    Mekk-Knight Avram was perfect for this! Missed opportunity

  • @619Slipk
    @619Slipk Рік тому +7

    Rarran still being haunted by the summoning boys that got the arrows

  • @Bob_Bobinson
    @Bob_Bobinson Рік тому +21

    How does stevie think that pot of greed is no longer a good card?
    If it was unbanned it would see play in every deck, no matter how good or bad it is.

    • @burningfox4974
      @burningfox4974 Рік тому +7

      Even the retrains get limited or semi-limited, and those have restrictions and costs

    • @wolfwolf7152
      @wolfwolf7152 Рік тому

      No it wouldn't see play in every single deck

    • @Bob_Bobinson
      @Bob_Bobinson Рік тому +6

      @@wolfwolf7152 how so?

    • @skeletonwar4445
      @skeletonwar4445 Рік тому +8

      ​@@wolfwolf7152It absolutely would. You're delusional if you think otherwise.
      Even in a Droll format like now, people would still immediately put 3 copies of it in their decks lol.

    • @rafi...___
      @rafi...___ Рік тому +1

      @@Bob_Bobinson because there is other options thats arguably better for some decks. some of them has been so consistent,that its better to use those slots for hand traps. example,fairy drytron,kashtira,tearlament,adamancipator. these decks is already consistent or they dont care about drawing. and arguably,its just better play talent. since it has other effect in case you are under droll or opp has collosus by hand rip or stealing a monster

  • @ДимитърПоптолев

    They didn't fk up "Insect". Types are capitalized, attributes are all caps.

  • @ivenstorm
    @ivenstorm Рік тому +7

    If I remember correctly, there were cards that could turn enemy monsters into insects, which is why Aerosol was a used card.

    • @burningfox4974
      @burningfox4974 Рік тому +1

      It was also an early era generic wipe card. Where stuff like field spells that boost one Attribute, and every single Monster Type had a field wipe.
      Like the Witch’s Strike or that one fiend one.

  • @justarandomviewer6756
    @justarandomviewer6756 Рік тому +7

    I’m kinda sad we didn’t see the rock paper scissors card or the card that made you give your opponent a handshake. That last one definitely has some interesting stories to it.

    • @Sanguivore
      @Sanguivore 5 місяців тому

      Your profile picture is adorable! :D

  • @GumshoeClassic
    @GumshoeClassic Рік тому +7

    Linear Equation Cannon is an absolute classic, I once showed it to a friend and he spent a solid two minutes refusing to believe that they actually printed this.

    • @Bob_Bobinson
      @Bob_Bobinson Рік тому +4

      now we should retrain it with quadratic equation cannon

    • @TheBlueAkumu
      @TheBlueAkumu Рік тому

      Oh my god, now I want a math oriented archetype.
      Make it a synchro archetype just to make it harder to play.

    • @GumshoeClassic
      @GumshoeClassic Рік тому

      @@TheBlueAkumu I mean we do have Mathmech, but tbh I think F.A. fits that bill better. It's not equations, but you still juggle numbers constantly.

    • @TheBlueAkumu
      @TheBlueAkumu Рік тому

      @york9036 Yeah, mathmech doesn't fit it. F.a is cool cause of the level changes.
      Oh, I know how to make it even worse. Make it a synchro PENDULUM deck that has you do math.

  • @Rodzario
    @Rodzario 11 місяців тому +2

    Good thing he didn't gave you the Musician King fusion card. Cause that card's fusion material is so bizarre bro

  • @Joural0401
    @Joural0401 Рік тому +3

    "Pot of greed is arguably not that good.."
    No? It would be in just about every deck. It forces ash, and if they don't have ash, it just gives an easy +1. Who would ever say PoG isn't insane?
    Best card in the game? No, Maxx "c" exists, and probably it pales next to most specific archetype consistency cards these days, but it's still insane in context of how universal its power is

    • @BoxWizard
      @BoxWizard Рік тому +1

      Na its bad man, just like graceful charity. I mean you have to discard 2 cards! Its not even a plus 1 🙃

  • @randalledwards529
    @randalledwards529 Рік тому +4

    Fun fact about weather report. It actually broke the game at one point because it was the first card printed that gave you two battle phases in a turn. This is the reason why every card that has battle phase effects has to denote whether or not you can use its effect in each battle phase of your turn.

  • @Blizz3112
    @Blizz3112 Рік тому +12

    2:08 Actually, they made a card working like that for nearly every typing in the game...

    • @amethonys2798
      @amethonys2798 Рік тому +3

      System Down is still one of the dirtiest versions of a tech card

    • @TheSkullkid777
      @TheSkullkid777 Рік тому +1

      @@amethonys2798 To be fair, system down did came out in the GX era, unlike most of those early typing tech cards they printed, puppet plant is another tech card that was interesting and had a nice niche in the Duelist Alliance Era

  • @adams095ify
    @adams095ify Рік тому +34

    Bro, just a tip, having Stevie on as your yugioh expert is doing a disservice to the community

  • @scottsocia7828
    @scottsocia7828 Рік тому +6

    I love watching Hidden Valley Ranch content when he's trying to guess cards. Really entertaining.

  • @Marco-xv1et
    @Marco-xv1et Рік тому +2

    He is like "they fucked up eradicating aerosol" and doesn't realise that barrier statues are based on attributes and they are always caps ☠️

  • @alex_hashtag2198
    @alex_hashtag2198 Рік тому +4

    The main thing I learned from this video is that I want Negotiating with the "C" to be a real cards, even if it has a different effect

  • @FGOboi
    @FGOboi Рік тому +2

    I'm glad that even tho you didn't enjoy the game, you still do this kind of "guess ygo card" video thing

  • @AshwinSelvakumar
    @AshwinSelvakumar Рік тому +4

    The summoning bois with the arrows is an awesome way to describe Links

  • @Randomturtle001
    @Randomturtle001 Рік тому +5

    Negotiating With The "C" may look real, but I knew it was fake as the card: Contact "C" already takes up the 6 star slot.

  • @Ariovisti
    @Ariovisti Рік тому +3

    This was great! Please do it again. I love seeing you react to the utter madness of these cards.

  • @matija5748
    @matija5748 Рік тому +9

    Let's gooo got them all, negotiating with the c made me think for a second though it looks way too real.

    • @superskrub4209
      @superskrub4209 Рік тому +4

      The last one almost got me, the name, art (lmao), effect and statline are all super realistic but I've never heard of this card before so I said no. It could've very well come out last week tho

  • @Counselor-yj8hk
    @Counselor-yj8hk Рік тому +3

    The fact that Linear Equation Cannon can straight up "sudoku" you is hilarious.

  • @ragenaros4475
    @ragenaros4475 Рік тому +2

    21:20 Thunder Dragon Colossus handtrap HELL NO.

  • @sirboi6708
    @sirboi6708 Рік тому +3

    I was afraid he would stop making yugioh content altogether after the master duel stream. Happy to see he is still doing it. I dont watch ramranch because im not interested in hearthstone content, but every yugioh video of his is a banger and a must watch for me. Stevie and him are a great duo.

    • @Ricozaza
      @Ricozaza Рік тому +4

      Expect Stevie doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Example is his pot of greed statement.

  • @IXxJordan
    @IXxJordan Рік тому +2

    10:45 - Closest card I can think of to Town Twister is Infinite Impermanence: Instead of Destroying, it negates the column if it fully resolves and it targets the monster first instead of the spell/trap.

  • @B.27y
    @B.27y Рік тому +8

    What is Stevie saying Pot of Greed is bad? Every deck would play it

    • @MotivGuy94
      @MotivGuy94 2 місяці тому

      it would be a MASSIVE game changer for my deck due to its inconsistency and lack of cards that allow me to draw.

  • @guyincognito7518
    @guyincognito7518 11 місяців тому +1

    Man how did you not include “Alligator Sword” the card description on that thing would’ve made his head spin 😂

  • @Foucz
    @Foucz Рік тому +7

    Thank you for video Rarran.

    • @alexgk9557
      @alexgk9557 Рік тому

      Chad thanking individual :)

  • @Christian-rv4cy
    @Christian-rv4cy Рік тому +2

    "Pot of Greed is arguably not even that good right now" DAWG WHAT

    • @phoenix5095
      @phoenix5095 Рік тому

      I mean I'd rather play handtraps or board breakers over pot of greed rn non ironically but some decks that have alot of room def would play it

    • @Christian-rv4cy
      @Christian-rv4cy Рік тому

      @@phoenix5095 dog, it's a free plus 1. You know what's a good way to draw your hand trap and board breakers??? I'll give you one guess

    • @phoenix5095
      @phoenix5095 Рік тому

      @@Christian-rv4cy yea prosperity grabs those and much easier also again it takes up space you would rather draw those card to begin with and not lose to a single droll lmao in a void it's broken yes put it into the meta and u would be surprised it's not as good

    • @Christian-rv4cy
      @Christian-rv4cy Рік тому

      @@phoenix5095 how many decks can wrong prospy vs how many decks can run greed. Greed has the benefit of having literally no cost. If you get drolled you get drolled. You're still better of playing the card. You're not ever in any sort of worse position with that card

    • @Bob_Bobinson
      @Bob_Bobinson Рік тому

      @@phoenix5095 If you're looking to play board breakers you are playing pot of greed. It draws you into your board breakers and your engine.
      Relying on hand traps is the only time you can actually justify not running pot of greed. Almost all decks would run pot of greed in an instant.

  • @TopPigg
    @TopPigg Рік тому +2

    The speed dual bug spray gimmick, was you used a card/ability to turn all if your opponents monsters into insects. So instead of hoping they ran the type, you forced it so this because a board wipe

  • @fidelluz2942
    @fidelluz2942 5 місяців тому +5

    at 5:33 you're trash talking the game for the wrong reason, Insect is a type while DIVINE is a attribute. There's nothing wrong with barrier statue of the creator except being way too powerful

  • @Zthewise
    @Zthewise Рік тому +4

    Not only is Weather Report real. Someone made a super janky OTK with it.

  • @cyberdoga5728
    @cyberdoga5728 Рік тому +1

    Fun fact about Castle of Dark Illusions that throws a lot of people off, even though the effects are wildly different it was theorized that Castle of Dark Illusions printed form unintentionally (or rather illogically) got the effect for Pumpkin, King of Ghosts which was released in the same pack irl and in the same part of the anime. There are many possible reasons for this including the idea that they did not know how to translate Castle of Dark Illusions effect into something coherent. But this example is especially strange because the characters that played both cards are not related by any other means.

  • @johannesschneider5209
    @johannesschneider5209 Рік тому +5

    funny thing is, I as a yugioh player myself actually guessed some of them wrong. there is just so many trash cards in this game you never saw xD

  • @a.giovanni.m6740
    @a.giovanni.m6740 Рік тому +5

    Pot of Egotism is a Rush Duel Card.

  • @olvynchuru1663
    @olvynchuru1663 Рік тому +3

    I suspected Negotiating with the "C" was fake since it didn't capitalize "special summon". Same goes for Barrier Statue of the Creator.

    • @burningfox4974
      @burningfox4974 Рік тому +1

      I knew barrier statue was fake only because the Divine attribute and Divine Beast monster type are only reserved for the “God” cards and only I think like 10 monsters have the “Divine” attribute

  • @masansr
    @masansr Рік тому +33

    Castle of Dark Illusions is one of the OG cards. I remember when you could use a Catapult Turtle to launch a monster at it's levitation ring to make it fall, but not before your own Swords of Revealing Light expired. Of course, they couldn't print all those cool interactions on the cards, you just had to know they worked like that.
    Edit: "Town Twister"'s [Spell Card] tag was misaligned, otherwise it would probably be a real card.

    • @orangegalen
      @orangegalen Рік тому +3

      They did that with Phantom Hand too, so it’s not a good measure. I saw that with Town Twister, then Phantom Hand and I literally threw my hands up in frustration.

    • @hi-i-am-atan
      @hi-i-am-atan Рік тому +4

      i think that's just a bug with the card maker. all of the backrow cards with a type, including the real ones, have that same issue
      the real tell with town twister, though, is how its text falls apart as soon as you target a card in a column with two or more monsters

    • @xXMGVXx
      @xXMGVXx Рік тому

      @@hi-i-am-atan In my box with weather report, the castle and the aerosol are definitely no misprints. Would love to mention that some cards missed the monster in monster card in their German translation. Just minor oversights that did not affect gameplay in any shape or form I assure you (I mean what difference could it make if you counted only monsters or all cards in a GY)

  • @draconicepic4124
    @draconicepic4124 Рік тому +3

    Let's be honest: Linear Equation Cannon is a meme card. I doubt anyone at Konami ever expected some one to actually play it.

  • @Onepiecefan95
    @Onepiecefan95 5 місяців тому +2

    Ygo players absolutly hate Linear equsion cannon. Because it makes us do math.

  • @BoxWizard
    @BoxWizard Рік тому +12

    I wish someone other then Stevie did these. He just feeds into the yU-gI-oH Is BaD sterotype WHILE not knowing anything about cards. Ex: Card types like Insect are not in all caps ever, Attributes are. As in FIRE, WATER, EARTH, and WIND ect.

  • @imperialmoose
    @imperialmoose Рік тому +1

    This was amazing, I could watch 50 of these. Yugi is so weird it's impossible to tell

  • @johnnickfanaccount3492
    @johnnickfanaccount3492 Рік тому +6

    What has this Steve guy never played the game before eradicating aerosol isn't worded incorrectly it's insect not an attribute.

    • @Cybertech134
      @Cybertech134 Рік тому +1

      Nasally zoomers talking like they know things

  • @TwistedAlly
    @TwistedAlly Рік тому +1

    The fact that Prophecy Destroyer wasn't here makes me sad, that card looks like somebody took a MTG card art and placed it in a YGO border

  • @XLuxtra
    @XLuxtra Рік тому +4

    Actually? Pot of Egotism would be busted. Its not a worse version of Sekkas Light per se. Its missin some lot points
    1. You can use Spellcards prior to the activation (and have dem in GY) You can just drop this at the end and Draw 2.
    2. You can still use Spell effects under this card. Sekkas light prevents activation and effects of Spell cards
    I think this card would be absolutely nuts. Maybe not in Skystriker but yea

    • @skeletonwar4445
      @skeletonwar4445 Рік тому +1

      Yeah Pot of Egotism would absolutely see play. A lot of decks only need their spells turn 1 to combo and then don't really care about them.

  • @Card-Trader
    @Card-Trader Рік тому +1

    10:32 every single Mekk-Knight card cares about columns

  • @bb7344
    @bb7344 Рік тому +3

    I really like that Negotiating with the "C" has the inspect cursor in the middle of the art and Rarran still guessed it as real
    then again, with all the Yugioh cards I saw in these videos, I wouldn't be surprised if that was not a 100% disqualifying factor

  • @danieltaylor4185
    @danieltaylor4185 Рік тому +1

    Cards like Bonfire just go to show that even people who played this game since it came out can't tell what the art style is. I started playing Yugioh in 2001, I did not already know this card existed, and I thought it was fake. The card art looked like a screenshot from an anime that might not even be Yugioh.

  • @purpleth3199
    @purpleth3199 Рік тому +3

    I swear, Rarran's interactions with yugioh, so far, were a trifecta of bad experiences. First, you have Stevie, who put the idea of "if it doesn't say win the game, it's not a good card" into Rarran's head, which is objectively wrong. The cards that Stevie brings to Rarran to guess, have been getting worse in terms of choice. Not to mention that, when Rarran has an actual question, Stevie is like "ignore that" or "don't worry about it" instead of actually answering the question. Then he played Master Duel, which is one of the worst things that Konami ever released and shows how badly they chose their priorities as a company. And finally was the "debate" with Farfa, in which Farfa seemingly tried to have a conversation for half of the time, only to starts being toxic and clowning on Rarran for the second half...

    • @BoxWizard
      @BoxWizard Рік тому +4

      Idk if id say Master Duel is bad buuuuuuuuuuut it is bad at teaching new players which IS bad. If it had a half-way decent tutorial it would be great.

    • @purpleth3199
      @purpleth3199 Рік тому +3

      @@BoxWizard the good thing that Master Duel did is it made easier to know what effects your opponent is using (because it highlights them) and maybe it made it easier to follow the board state. But other than that: it's the same outdated tutorial; a solo mode with gimmicky and bad decks, with stories that are there just to be there; there is no match duels, only single duels; because of that, it made a completely new format that encourages burn strategies... I could go on about the many things I hate about Master Duel, but I am going to finish with: Since they planned to release it on every platform, they should've made it for new players and people who have never seen the game, not making it so it would be easier for current active players who already understand the game.

    • @BoxWizard
      @BoxWizard Рік тому +1

      ​@@purpleth3199 Fair points. Tho as a guy with no friends who play or a locals near me its not a bad option. Lets say its a 5/10. still better than duel links.

    • @purpleth3199
      @purpleth3199 Рік тому +1

      @@BoxWizard everything is better than duel links and I get that it's a decent option, considering the other option are simulators with no tutorial, but I still think it's tragic that yugioh, to this day, doesn't have a good and consistent online platform...

  • @okamizero1459
    @okamizero1459 Рік тому +2

    I feel like this would have been way harder for rarran before he played yugioh and lost any semblance of belief in Konamis design ability.

  • @guthinkiller2
    @guthinkiller2 Рік тому +11

    The fact that neither of them noticed that the quick-play spell icon is half over the words Spell Card and Rarran says "This is the most realistic card you have shown me" Is pure chaos and I love it.

    • @-DeScruff
      @-DeScruff Рік тому +10

      The cards were remade via the fake yugioh card maker to give fake cards a fair chance of looking real.

  • @emred4653
    @emred4653 Рік тому +1

    Great choice of cards, mostly old cards or ones with unique effects instead of generic stuff

  • @bimbendorf5166
    @bimbendorf5166 Рік тому +3

    Let me guess before watching the vid. He absolutely can not

  • @MrGeorgeFlorcus
    @MrGeorgeFlorcus 11 місяців тому +1

    A theoretical "Barrier Statue of the Creator" would be the most insane card ever

  • @Xappan
    @Xappan Рік тому +4

    After seeing Rarran's video about yugioh, and the points he brings up, + this video, I think he'd enjoy GOAT format, or any prior. A video on it would be fun as it is more like a real card game than yugioh is now haha.

    • @U1TR4F0RCE
      @U1TR4F0RCE Рік тому +5

      I think Edison is more likely since the problem with GOAT is that it’s too much like bad mtg. Edison at least is its own game. As well as doesn’t have a super consistent ftk people have to gentleman out of.

    • @zhaoyun255
      @zhaoyun255 Рік тому

      @@U1TR4F0RCEJust play Power of Chaos as a starter.

  • @Acre00
    @Acre00 6 місяців тому +1

    I am so happy Linear Equation Cannon exists

  • @Dante7Z
    @Dante7Z Рік тому +3

    This Heartstone guy knows everything about card games. He played ALL the card games out there. And YuGiOh, for THREE hours...

  • @baval5
    @baval5 5 місяців тому +1

    Pot of Egotism is a way better version of Sekkas Light, why say its worse? Pot can be used after you use other spells, and only locks spells instead of both spells and traps. It also lets you use the effects of continuous spells you have already activated, which Sekkas Light doesnt. The only thing worse about it is it doesnt have the GY effect.

  • @WoodsRunner
    @WoodsRunner Рік тому +4

    Stevie has so bad takes. Pot of greed isn’t “arguably not that good in the modern game” what are you saying 😭

    • @bendegen8579
      @bendegen8579 Рік тому +4

      Dude has some of the consistently worse takes I have ever seen, it is almost impressive. I wish Rarran collaborated with some other yugioh creator for this content

    • @WoodsRunner
      @WoodsRunner Рік тому

      @@bendegen8579 genuinely just get farfa, mbt, cimo, literally anyone 😭

  • @22Vnnami
    @22Vnnami Рік тому

    I will say, it is one thing I like about some of the Yugioh card design, there are some genuinely funny and entertaining cards that no one would ever use but you’re glad they still exist and are now very nostalgic of how the game was even jankier back in the day