Scythians and Kushans Both Worshipped Deities similar to India, Persia and Greek Spread from North of India to East of Europe, SW of Their's were Persian. Deities among the World were all the Same in Arabia. Mesopotamia and Egypt were having the Deities similar to us. The American's also have links as the Whole World was Already Global Since the Ancient Civilizations to the Middle of Modern Civilizations.
David Reich's book 'Who we are and how we got here', through genetic studies shows that modern Indians have a significant Western Eurasian Steppe genes. And that this mixing likely happened 2-4 millennia back. North Indians have this DNA between 20-80%.This does not surprise me given the incessant invasions from the steppe. The story from the Rig Veda is what interests me the most, it talks about the schism between the Bhrigus Angirasas and how the former moved West whilst the latter looked eastward. Climate change then broadened this gulf of contact. I put a lot of emphasis on the Rig Veda (read Lost River by Michel Danino & books by Shrikant Talageri.). Much of these DNA studies are corroborated with more recent DNA studies done on the Indus Valley, Sinhauli extracted from burials, no Steppe DNA was found in these. I think the jury is still out on whether Mittani's, Scythians and other central Asian groups are 'Indian' in origin. It seems more likely that they share ancestral genes from the very ancient Indo Iranian tribes mixed with 1st peoples of Central Asia. Paints a very different picture, which till date has been ignored by the West.
Mittanis were definitely Indo-Aryans, there is no doubt regarding that & has been accepted by even most western scholars. Regarding others, the clever trick up their sleeve is to connect everything with Iranian but not Indian. So, basically they will agree that Central Asia and the Caucuses(b/w Caspian and Black Sea) where Scythians (& Sarmatians from whom derived the legend of Amazonian women) were located were all Iranian tribes. They will also agree about the Alans who went to Europe and settled before the Germanic tribes at the time of Hunas invasion. Genetic study proves that Greeks were also derived from Iranian tribes too, but it is the basis of "Western Civilization". How can they accept that in the popular culture?! So the East vs West bullshit with the Eurocentric lens is still going on! Best thing for us is to bring forth the evidences of indigenous civilization as well as the movement from India to both Central Asia and Iran. That and amplification of this theory beyond the control of Europhile media and academia in power and part of the left ecosystem. I have read on quora, although needing more well articulated and well presented paper on the same regarding the legend/myth of King Arthur that it is actually an iranian one passed on through the migrating tribes. It was told by some Croatian guy(and not an Indian guy) who also agreed that before Germans and Slavs crossed over it was iranian tribes in present day croatia as well with the remnants of language and culture more similar to iranian ones in many aspect.
What Reich tries to hide is that this "steppe DNA" is itself an admixture of a southern component and more northerly components. The northerly components are shared with such people as the Uralics and Turkics. And the southern component originated in Bharata as demonstrated by the Rakhigarhi team led by Dr. Vasant Shinde. The very minor steppe stuff in modern Indians is from the well known Saka/turanian invasions. And the significant southern components found in Siberia and Europe are from Indian travelers/migrants at various periods: starting with OIT, then the Indian input into the Sakas, then Buddhist era inputs. The southern component increases with time in the North!
Incessant invasions from steppe !! Hmm ...... That means you haven't gone through the books of a person whom you are referring to ..... That is SHRIKANT TALAGERI .....
Reich is an Aryan invasion (or migration, tourism, picnic, call it whatever) peddling shill who has only lately started trying to monkey-balance his rockstar reputation with the new genetics data post his book, in which all he does is terminological jugglery to subvert the truth. Haplogroup genetics can never settle the war for the linguistic/cultural homeland. But even with that these guys have to constantly rely on pseudoscientific sleights of hand and sneaky academic skulduggery to prove that their chosen "Aryan" Y-DNA is not of Indo-Iranian origins. Abhishek Suman and darkprince above are absolutely right.
@@technoyamraj I did, however there are other sources too. All I am saying is that the people from the Steppes have been nomadic for millennia and it doesnt surprise me that Indians would have their DNA
Puranas, sutras and Rig veda. All the tribes and kings are mentioned. Druhiyu tribe had a king named Pracetas who migrated to mlecca territory and his decendants founded various kingdoms. Amavasu the son of Pururavas went west his decendants are parsu aratta and gandhari and city settled by hitites is named after him and is called Amasya. Anu clan and subclans were defeated in battle of ten kings. Pashtuns bhalanas or balochis Khwarizmians Alena Bhrigu parsava parthava Sarmatian etc were part of Anu(proto iranians).
I have grown up hearing the story of the origins of my ancestors. Sun worshiper who came to Bharatvarsha from Shak Dweep, supposedly in present day Iran, to establish Sun temples and to cure leprosy. I wonder if this is a Scythian connection! #askabhijit
Sun worshipper should have been your first clue to what religion they were and why they came to India lmao. Have yet to hear of another faith that worships surya and makes temples in his name other than Hindus. The Iranians were once part of Aryavarta so this is not surprising.
@@bharatv5563 Where did he tell about Aryan Invasion Theory? Aryavarta means the Land of Perfection, and the name was given to India by Hindu Gods & Goddesses.
"The split of R1a (M420) is computed to c. 22,000[1] or 25,000[2] years ago, which is the time of the last glacial maximum. A 2014 study by Peter A. Underhill et al., using 16,244 individuals from over 126 populations from across Eurasia, concluded that there was "a compelling case for the Middle East, possibly near present-day Iran, as the geographic origin of hg R1a".
This is interesting or makes more sense i think. I took dna test and also mytrue ancestry. I am Eastern European (Hungarian mother as i know), with germanic, french, and some more, and 1% northern indian from my mothers side (Hungarian/Eastern European), and when i took true ancestry, my top or closest ancient populations are Franks, Scythians, Thuringii, Belgae, and Gauls, my top closest one as Scythians + Franks. I am trying to look into each and now find some writing or relations like Hungarians with Scythians, but then also now Indians especially with the Scythians, and hear eastern europe are scythians. I didnt think I would trace back a bit to the 1% northern indian since it was so little. I feel like I did now finding scythians originate or come from there even if my Eastern european and germanic possibly is also from them. What also makes me wonder is, if I am not mistaken, I hear scythians or sakas as called are said to come from another planet, and came to earth and became star warriors. Eventually kicked out of India, I hear due to sins?. It reminds me, there is some idea how Hungarians descended from one of Noah's sons, and another comment I saw under a scythian video mentioning a long list about scythians and some hungarian, and the top was about how Hungarians who are scythians have to abandon the scythian pagan ways and false deities in order to return to christ. It reminds me how the flood came due to "fallen angels" corrupting or teaching humanity, and makes me wonder if sakas have any relations to these events. Though, I could be terribly wrong and pieceing together wrong information
Very well said. Thanks. Problem is that history writers have relied only on western studies. They have ignored what was obvious. Iran people are Aryans. French language has many sanskrit words. Tom is om , John is jyan means gyan . Simon is shriman, ignis is Agni. I am is ahm ,,,me French philosopher Gur jiaf is guru ji and so on. One should not forget role of Tax shila university at Peshawar which trained thousands of scholars to rule every sphere of life in central Asia iran ,iraq middle East, Greece and parts of Europe. Particularly rulling and. Business class.
Word is Arya and not aryan. It's an adjective to refer to people who were noble &pious and dharmic. Even buddhist pali texts mention the word Arya in a positive sphere and as an adjective. But during the colonial rule Max Muller was the demon who gave a new meaning of Arya changed its pronunciation to aryan and created the dogmatic picnic theory.
@@Arjun-pi2iq maxmular was a vedic scholar. He had to manage a sanskrit brahman teacher from Pune. Because all Brahmins refused to teach him vedas. You are right aryan is his invention but don't forget he was a German . Though well versed in English . But it should be recognized that he introduced knowledge of Veda to the western world. He even directed British civil service officers to respect brahmins. Otherwise britishers had very disrespect for Brahmins. I suppose that it was God's design to unfurl the glory of indian spiritual knowledge in the western world and preserve the holy books .
@@Vankatraman Aah!, I had also similar misconceptions as you. First of all say what's the significance in spreading something which is of dubious quality , full of absurdities and ungenuine? If you would read his misinterpreted mantras then you will only find stories without any head or tail and only meat,beef,slaughter, racism etc. Yes, I studied whole of Mr. Muller from "The life and letters of Max Muller". He was a poor German who came to Bharat for some pennies, and he didn't had any peny to return back there and he one day met Lord Macaulay and that changed his life. He began his new work. So here's what he says about Macaulay(the man who wanted to create a class - Indians in blood but English in taste). Such great praises to him.⬇️ “…I made acquaintance this time in London with Macaulay, and had along conversation with him on the teaching necessary for the young men who are sent out to India. He is very clear headed, and extraordinarily eloquent…I went back to oxford a sadder, and, I hope, a wiser man." (The life and letters of Maxmuller, vol.1, p.162, London edition). Next, let's come to the point where we get the revealation that he was a christian agent. Dr. Pusey wrote to Maxmuller. “I cannot but think that your lectures on the Vedas… are the greatest gift which had been bestowed on those who would win to Christianity the subtle and thoughtful minds of the cultivated Indians.” (The life and letters of Maxmuller, vol.1, p. 237-238, London edn.) Today even people think Maxmuller as friend of Hindus; a scholar extraordinary in Vedas, the letter of Maxmuller written to his wife in 1866 exposed his aspirations. “I hope I shall finish that work (translation of Rigveda), and I feel convinced, though I shall not live to see it, that this edition of mine and the translation of the Veda will hereafter tell to a great extent on the fate of India, and on the growth of millions of souls in that country. It is the root of their religion, and to show them what that root is, I feel sure, is the only way of uprooting all that has sprung up from it during the last 3000 years”. (The life and letters of Maxmuller, vol.1, p. 328, London edn.) So, I hope now its clear that what Max Muller actually wanted to do wearing a secular facemask like our politicians- to produce an interpretation and representation of the veda reading and knowing which the hindus would feel guilt and shame of their religion and abondon their ancient dharma and adopt christianity and finally he hoped India could become a christian country.
How are you so confident that R1a has an indian origin? And why south indians don't have R1a ? How is it possible that north indians travelled upto east Europe, but can't go south india? Please answer this question
@@niranjansrinivasan4042 south Indian almost all indian have r gene ,r1 gene ( tribal have most ) , r1a mutation version of r/r1 , gene mutation happened in north ( may be in Himalayas ) later those (r1a) Holder migrated all over the world including south india
#AskAbhijit Why did the British decide to leave India? Some people say it was congress and Gandhi's non violence tactics, others say it was a financially weak Britain which was starting to see mutiny in its navy inspired by SCB. What's the truth?
The British saw that in the British-Indian Army ranks there could be a rebellion after World War II, so it because apparently clear to British that if the Army rebelled their staff in India which numbered in less would be impact heavy losses. So that is why British left India.
In veda it is mentioned that people of various races came settled in India over time. In veda they have been given names initially but when there was flood of various ethnicity poured in veda stopped mentioning them. So from vedic literature people from various races came and settled in India. People might have gone out of India also but there is no mention of that.
#AskABhijit Sir could you please share some knowledge about Bengali people's history. We barely know anything about them as we are never taught in schools but I believe they were great people and especially great businessmen
Why not use the Internet, it's not that difficult. But here's one interesting fact that Bengal used to be the centre of Bharat as that's how big Bharat once was. The father of our nation is from Bengal!
Kushans were Yuezhi people from the Tarim basin in North Western China, Xiongnu people (170 BC) displaced them to Bacteria where they knocked off Hellenistic kingdoms (aka Indo-Greeks) and got assimilated (Indianized) over a period of time. It is not strange at all for Yuezhi nomads to assimilate swiftly with advanced sedentary civilizations like the Indian civilization. Proto-Indo-European people (Yamanayas) moved out of Steppe to various places (EU, SE Asia) and assimilated with the indigenous cultures. There is no way Indo-Europeans who came from harsh arid lands like the steppe would have volunteered to go back to the steppe by giving up the fertile Indian lands and advanced sedentary civilization. There is no shame in accepting that Homo Sapiens came out of Africa and moved across the world and a bunch of them (aka proto Indo-European speakers) reached India and assimilated with the existing proto-cultures. We are all related to each other and no one is superior or inferior to another. We learned from each other, pivoted, and became the dominant animals on this planet.
What I belive that North Indians Himalayan people are scythians such as newars , pahadi , kumaoni , garhwali , all the way till tarim basin Xinjiang etc. beacause our gods around few hundred years back were totally different we had local deities
just see the video about the scythians of the " Kings and Generals " channel because it explains very well detailed info on the ancient scythians and there are records of the scythians having White Skin and Blue 🔵 eyes from BOTH Greek and Chinese sources
#AskABhijit Sir can u tell us more about dasrajna yudh or battle of 10 kings, the vedic tribes who fought the war, and who were the ancient pakthas and yaddos
A iranian girl to show me her DNA She said me she is 88% West Asian and 7% Turkish and 3% earopean and 2% South asian but I told her how is this possible West asian Arabs are samtian and iranian are aryan I think DNA mai kuch jhol hai!
Ultimately, yes. They were one of several outcasted or Vratya groups that migrated via Iran and turned to Asura worship. Essentially, all Eurasian pantheons from western IVC to Mesopotamia to Syria/Anatolia and northeastern Europe - were all of Asuric origins. In Norse mythology, Odin, father of Thor (their apabhransha version of Indra), was literally the leader of the 'Aesirs'.
@@ALeaud There's no such thing as an "Indian nationalist". Get your basics in order before you decide to get butthurt by the history of culture in the ancient world. Also, maybe try not to strawman the 'Indian origin' of Assura worship in Eurasia with dumb retorts like "Assyrians weren't Indians lmao". The founding culture of the nascent Assyrian state was certainly of Vedic origins, even though the groups that took it there got assimilated over time and were eventually Semitized at least linguistically and ethnically. I'm sure you're clueless about Sumerians having been found to be of the same genetic stock as the IVC population. The conquering/ruling aristocracies of the Hittite, Kassite & Mitanni were all Sanskrit apabhransha speaking (read late Vedic aka Indo-Aryan) out of India (Indo-Iranic) martial groups that spread out after the fall of IVC cities once the Saraswati all but dried up ~2000 BCE. Earlier, they also went out as political outcasts or imperial explorers (Vratya), like after the Dasharajnya and Kurukshetra wars as described in astounding detail in texts like the Rg Veda and Mahabharata. History deniers like you can keep seething.
Scythians - (Saka) were migrants due to internal conflicts with their cousins the Parthians. I’m the descendant of the Saka tribe and my DNA strongly suggests Afghanistan and Other Iran Mesopotamia- Caucasian. R1A blood line. India is not the birth lineage of R1A I understand they ruled the region from central to South but that doesn’t justify your claim that Sakas are Indian. Thanks!!!
Hmm... According to local legends in Indonesia, Aji Saka/Ajiwaka/Ajivaka from Bumi Majeti/Kali Serayu river in Jambudwipa is our unifying figure especially for the people of Java and Sunda. He introduced aksara Hanacaraka/Javanese script, agama tirta/belief of Hyang/animism-dynamism, and Saka calendar to Java island/Jawadwipa... Yunan and Irrawaddy-Mekong river in Indochina are also our ancestors second homeland before our ancestors moved to the rest of Greater Sunda Islands/present day Indonesia... Saka-Yavana-Daha (Sunda-Java), Malaya-Kamboja-Champa (Malay) are the main ethnic groups in Southeast Asia... After the Cholamandala-Sriwijaya war, we moved the center of agama Buddha from Nalanda to Borobudur and the center of belief in Hyang/Hong/Ong/Om from Kalasan to Mt. Semeru/Mahameru in East Java. And also we named the strait between Sumatra/Swarnadwipa and mainland Asia with Malacca/Melaka strait (Melaka/Malacca = mleccha/foreigners)... Dunno whether Scythian in this version is similar to Saka from Aji Saka legend (Indonesian/Sunda-Javanese legend)... In Kosambi region, Bandung City, the capital of West Java/Sunda also has this legend...
However, the social stratification between Indian and Sunda-Javanese (Indonesia) is very different... We have raja-resi/begawan or senapati ing alaga sayyidin panatagama... Raja/king has role as panatagama/religious administrator... We use this system till this very day, especially during the Mataram Islam kingdom (the largest Islamic Sultanate in Southeast Asia)... Maybe the root of this system came from Medang Keling/Medang Mataram kingdom... An ancient kingdom made by the people of Java and Sunda together with the refugees from Keling/Kalingga kingdom after Muria-Keling/Maurya-Kalingga war...
#AskAbhijit Sir we all know religious polarisation in any country is dangerous. It has the potential to destroy a country from within. Is religious polarisation happening in india? Is it bad for india? If yes then what do we need to do? Please sir answer this. This is very much important.
#AskAbhijit Sir, where does the term 'Scapegoat' comes from? I thought it would be a history question so I asked. It's not to insult you with unrelated comments. I genuinely think you may answer.
They were indians only because they represented best of indian society they represented best of indian culture so many outsiders and some historians who are Anti - Hindus they try to criticize rajputs but they are not able to provide proofs you yourself tell me if rajputs were outsiders then where are ancient kshatriyas gone brother they are the same people they are ancient kshatriyas only due to shift in language from sanskrit to hindi and many other language the words like rajputra, rajanya, raju changes and it is called rajputs in hindi Historians just try to take the words so seriously but if u ask them they are not able to provide proofs
@@indianhistory2190in my States, maximum royal family are from gond dynasty (gond tribe). Gond is a proto Dravidian tribe. And ancient times, all kingdom of my States origined from tribe Native tribe
I had seen a video of a guy reenacting scythian armored horseman , when he started charging for attack it had so much kshatriya vibe it's like i can't explain through words until upto point and your video i always saw scythians as foreign invaders
North Indians have this type of characters, maybe u can have but pure scythian genetics is lost due to intermixing, though their origins is also indo-eurasians
First artefact of zvastika we're found in Cucuteni culture in nowadays Romania, Ukraine and Moldova(eastern part of Romania. The pelasgian people,ancestors of the getae(today we are called romanians)
Please discuss on the incident in Mahabharat where Jayadrath was killed by Arjuna. Isn't the sun set or covered by Sudarshan chakra incident is same like in Northern polar region?
# Ask Abhijit , Gurudev since we know that our education system is made in concern of our faculty - school colleges , coaching classes . There is only wastage of money and time . Can you please tell us what is real education and how can I teach myself the things , skills and subject for my own development.
Scythian's Were Brown Light Skin ( Not White Skin ) They Had Brown Eye's, They Had Dark Hair In Chinese Scythian's Known As Yuezhi And In Chinese Yuezhi It's Means Invaders Or Foreigner | It's Well Known There Was No Friction Or Conflict Between Scythian's Population That Came In To India And Settled Down They Had Smiler Culture ( Sun, Fire Worshipping ) And Ethnicity If They Had Been Different Ethnicity Or Different Culture Then You Would Have Large Scale Roiting, Lot's Of Ethnics Strife Or Lot's Of Religious Strife But There Was Non Of These, They Settled In West India And Established Kingdom Hormonally With The People Of India All Of This Taken Together Shows That Ethnically, Genetically, Culturally, Linguistically, Religiously Very Much As The Indian's |
I am a Hindu gujjar from Indian punjab , and I can say that my ancestors were kushans, who were followed old Rigvedic culture, I don't know how can some people says that the kushans and scythians Invaded India😡😡, They Came back India to conquer their own territory, because they went utside Bharata for some reasons because in ancient times there were no boundaries to define a definite territory.
Just because the highest concentration lies in a place does not mean it is the place of origin of a genticmarker, nor does its diversity. Thinking that way would mean because Australia is mostly European now and has the highest diversity , mean Caucasions originated in Australia. What happened in Australia is he original inhabitants were systematically and deliberaely exterminated and replaced. It might mean similar things might have happened in India, or it was a peaceful assimmilation.
Sir on Turks . Some of Us living In Uttrakhand Too have Blond hairs buy mostly girls have Them not boys generally . I think the Tushara(Turks) have it cause They were basically An Army of Exiled maleechas From India who just Invaded foreign lands and Married locals By even Kidnapping And war booties As they didn't followed Vedic rules of Not Harrasing common people
That's why latin people look like Indians but white just a little bit touch of lighter skin but still being kinda brown unlike how romans or latins are popularized as white people with blonde hair and stuff and stuff.
well according to turkish linguistics turkish/turkic languages has more shared words with sanskrit than modern english and loads of more shared words with dravidian languages make them guess if in the past two agglunative language family "turkish languages and dravidian language family" seperated from a common origin? sanskrit protoindoeuropean proto persian do not seem to be originated in central asia. also take into account that very similiar languages expected to have common origins korean, turkish, japanese, mongolian cannot be proved to be from a protolanguage although there should be one. today it is assumed korean could be linked to another dravidian language called as tamil! there is a possibility macro altaic could be solved by dravidian language family and it is more likely dravidian people migrated out of india or into india! sanskrit speaking people's route was like westward to iran anatolia balkan germany england ... cant have anything to do with central asia. it is also more likely dravidians came into india from north or northwest later while the other part of them moved to east and conqured and assimilated by prototurkish people! hence yamnaya could be dravidian instead of sanksrit or indoeuropean or protopersian!!!!
@@rhutwijtulankar1326 no he is fat and hairy and looks like one of us indian specifically north Indian, maybe his ancestors mingled with someone who was quite local looking.
Hey!! #AskAbhijit Can you tell about the origins of Khatri/Arora caste people? Originally from North Western Undivided India. Now scattered throughout current Indian Union after partition. Mainly North, North West and West India.
i read a book called "rascial history of India " in which he say that khattis is corupt word for khatris these khattis ruled iran(not sure have to read again ) for 500 years as a shepherd king u can read this book available online
@@aryanchakraborty5175 khatri are a merchant caste since thousand years, their origin is probably kshatriya but their varna is basically vaishya same like baniyas
How can you say that Scythians are of Indian ORIGIN, then go on to say that they INVADED India, not once but TWICE. Where did they invade FROM?? All sources point to scythians being of Iranian Origin, yet here you are contradicting yourself 🤦🏻♂️
@@andyhawkins7988 🤣 Rajput is most mixed breed of Indian subcontinent. But they are mixed up of Indian origin castes only. Jats are not descendents of Sycthians. Infact, Sycthians may be Jats.
#AskAbhijit Sir What religion did the world follow before the abhramic religions were founded like Islam and Christianity since Islam and Christianity are not older than 2000 years? #askabhijit
#askabhijit who was Arabian goddess whose idol and follower came to india when Mohammed started killing Arab??? I joined my himalayan Rajput friend's puja ceremony where they were chanting these lines... Didn't get much info. from them but came 2 know about Mohammed from them... Is it true???
Sir mere hisab se mai aap ko kuch baat batana chahunga mai chota tha tab ek history book(jo ncert nahin thi) usme likha tha ki Scythian log aaj ka iranian province Sistan & baluchistan k log the kyonki Sistan ko hi saka sthan bola jata tha orr vahan ki hirmand county me hi sabse purana agni mandir tha jahan Zoroaster paida hua tha, Zoroaster ka matlab hai sunahre ऊट vala baba, orr Sistan k registan me ऊट mil sakte hai orr vo varun devata ki puja ko jyada manyata deta tha jiska matlab hai sindh se uska connection jyada tha, orr sindh k hi sath balochistan laga hua hai, mai kahna chahta hun ki saka log surya pujak the zunbils ki tarah orr ye Zoroaster jaise hi the, Zoroaster ne bas sikkhism buddhism jaise hinduism ka extract rup hai vaise hi rigved ko extract kar k apna culture chalaya, saka log Sistan k log hai inka Central asia se koi lena dena nahi hai orr mai sir कुषाण ka uccharan vaidik sanskrti me kukhan hota hai, orr kukhan log caucasian log the, jaise old Greeks Hindu कुष ko indicus caucasus bolte the vaise hi क कुषाण caucasian hue, yavan romans unani hai,
Maratha are kunbis ( farmers) , the Shivaji boshle was actually called Sudra king until his janeu ritual happened and one north Brahmin declared him khatriya with ancestory with sisodiya vansh ,but he was born Sudra and karmic khatriya
well with kushans their should not be any doubt they adopted indian culture and followed buddhism and hinduism also,if we can call mughals as indian dynasty then what's problem with kushans yes they immigrated but then adopted indian culture
Sanskrit did not "come to India". Sanskrit was born in greater North India (including current Kashmir, Afghanistan, western Punjab in Pak, Sindh, eastern Iran). And it was perfected in the region between the Ganga-Yamuna doab and modern-day Prayagraj, aka, Aryavarta as described in Baudhayana Kaplasutras.
How many times you guys lied,indic lands are very prosper from very ancient times,so i have some questions ,first is that why the people of this land with great financial prosperity were getting out of it?,and second is the main weapon of these nomadic origin people's ae "Horse back archery" which we've found in their paintings so plz tell me did horse back archery had it's roots in ancient indic culture absolutely not,and the last one is that why northern indic languages(punjabi,Sindhi,kashmiri, Marathi, Gujarati,saraiki)are completely different roots in comparing with the southern languages(Tamil ,Kannada, malayalam,) i hope you can answer to this cunning looking normal history loving student,i hope you can if you consider your opinion as a true side of history.
#askabhjijit Sir can u tell us more about dasrajna yudh or battle of 10 kings, the vedic tribes who fought the war, and who were the ancient pakthas and yaddos
@@Gundaa_bhai_50000 bhai kushans were gujjars.. I am gujjar too and my subcast is kasana ie kushana.. just the pronunciation thing.. jats kambojas and pathaks also have kushan ancestry.. as some kushans might entered these groups or something else..
Most of the North Western regions of India are due to the migration or invasion are mixed with Scythians, Kushans as well as Greek, Bactrians and the Huns. The Greek soldiers went all the way to Goa and took a boat back to Greece. Some soldiers stayed and some Goan's like the Konkani Brahmins have mingled with the Greeks as well ! India is a huge country and its long history resulted in mixing with various corners of India. Deep southern India is pretty much Indo-African in Adaman Islands, Tamil Nadu, Kerala and Sri Lanka, and Indo-Chinese in the Eastern regions of Tibet, Nepal, Tripura, Orissa, Meghalaya, Bengal and Burma
#AskAbhijit sir do you think that this universe is one of a cell of some human being and does everyone of our cells have a seperate universe in itself ? May be its too microscopic for us to see in and our universe is too big for us to see out .
#AskAbhijit , Sir can you correct me if I am wrong but when Arabs of Umayyad Caliphate invaded India the invasion was halted . But in case of the Turks this didn't happen . Was it only because at that point of time there was not a powerful empire in north India or because of rigid caste system as we are told .
#Askabhijit who are yadavs/ahirs are they shudras or kshtriyas or vaishyas. Who are yaduvanshi nandavanshi gwalavanshi yadavs and gopas? Was narayani sena made up of ahirs/yadavas
No one is shudra, kshatriya,brahman today, It was all varnas not castes. And you can't use system of vedic Period today because scenario is completely different.
Scythians and Kushans Both Worshipped Deities similar to India, Persia and Greek Spread from North of India to East of Europe, SW of Their's were Persian.
Deities among the World were all the Same in Arabia.
Mesopotamia and Egypt were having the Deities similar to us.
The American's also have links as the Whole World was Already Global Since the Ancient Civilizations to the Middle of Modern Civilizations.
they were indus/harappa people who migrated
Actually i am also saka descendent. Maga brahmin. But i proud to be indian
@@MythosIndia hahahaha. 🤣🤣🤣
@@Cvthepersy2ex 😅
David Reich's book 'Who we are and how we got here', through genetic studies shows that modern Indians have a significant Western Eurasian Steppe genes. And that this mixing likely happened 2-4 millennia back. North Indians have this DNA between 20-80%.This does not surprise me given the incessant invasions from the steppe.
The story from the Rig Veda is what interests me the most, it talks about the schism between the Bhrigus Angirasas and how the former moved West whilst the latter looked eastward. Climate change then broadened this gulf of contact. I put a lot of emphasis on the Rig Veda (read Lost River by Michel Danino & books by Shrikant Talageri.).
Much of these DNA studies are corroborated with more recent DNA studies done on the Indus Valley, Sinhauli extracted from burials, no Steppe DNA was found in these.
I think the jury is still out on whether Mittani's, Scythians and other central Asian groups are 'Indian' in origin. It seems more likely that they share ancestral genes from the very ancient Indo Iranian tribes mixed with 1st peoples of Central Asia.
Paints a very different picture, which till date has been ignored by the West.
Mittanis were definitely Indo-Aryans, there is no doubt regarding that & has been accepted by even most western scholars. Regarding others, the clever trick up their sleeve is to connect everything with Iranian but not Indian. So, basically they will agree that Central Asia and the Caucuses(b/w Caspian and Black Sea) where Scythians (& Sarmatians from whom derived the legend of Amazonian women) were located were all Iranian tribes. They will also agree about the Alans who went to Europe and settled before the Germanic tribes at the time of Hunas invasion. Genetic study proves that Greeks were also derived from Iranian tribes too, but it is the basis of "Western Civilization". How can they accept that in the popular culture?! So the East vs West bullshit with the Eurocentric lens is still going on! Best thing for us is to bring forth the evidences of indigenous civilization as well as the movement from India to both Central Asia and Iran. That and amplification of this theory beyond the control of Europhile media and academia in power and part of the left ecosystem.
I have read on quora, although needing more well articulated and well presented paper on the same regarding the legend/myth of King Arthur that it is actually an iranian one passed on through the migrating tribes. It was told by some Croatian guy(and not an Indian guy) who also agreed that before Germans and Slavs crossed over it was iranian tribes in present day croatia as well with the remnants of language and culture more similar to iranian ones in many aspect.
What Reich tries to hide is that this "steppe DNA" is itself an admixture of a southern component and more northerly components. The northerly components are shared with such people as the Uralics and Turkics. And the southern component originated in Bharata as demonstrated by the Rakhigarhi team led by Dr. Vasant Shinde. The very minor steppe stuff in modern Indians is from the well known Saka/turanian invasions. And the significant southern components found in Siberia and Europe are from Indian travelers/migrants at various periods: starting with OIT, then the Indian input into the Sakas, then Buddhist era inputs. The southern component increases with time in the North!
Incessant invasions from steppe !! Hmm ......
That means you haven't gone through the books of a person whom you are referring to .....
That is SHRIKANT TALAGERI .....
Reich is an Aryan invasion (or migration, tourism, picnic, call it whatever) peddling shill who has only lately started trying to monkey-balance his rockstar reputation with the new genetics data post his book, in which all he does is terminological jugglery to subvert the truth. Haplogroup genetics can never settle the war for the linguistic/cultural homeland. But even with that these guys have to constantly rely on pseudoscientific sleights of hand and sneaky academic skulduggery to prove that their chosen "Aryan" Y-DNA is not of Indo-Iranian origins. Abhishek Suman and darkprince above are absolutely right.
@@technoyamraj I did, however there are other sources too. All I am saying is that the people from the Steppes have been nomadic for millennia and it doesnt surprise me that Indians would have their DNA
Jai shree ram 🚩🚩
Sir please recommend us some books from where we can read 📖 these things.
He already has a vdo on the topic u are asking!
Read vedas and Mahabharata and Ramayana. All have been translated and do some data analysis.
Also read some genetic analysis too.
There is no such type of book exist.
Mahabharata.
Puranas, sutras and Rig veda. All the tribes and kings are mentioned. Druhiyu tribe had a king named Pracetas who migrated to mlecca territory and his decendants founded various kingdoms. Amavasu the son of Pururavas went west his decendants are parsu aratta and gandhari and city settled by hitites is named after him and is called Amasya. Anu clan and subclans were defeated in battle of ten kings. Pashtuns bhalanas or balochis Khwarizmians Alena Bhrigu parsava parthava Sarmatian etc were part of Anu(proto iranians).
I have grown up hearing the story of the origins of my ancestors. Sun worshiper who came to Bharatvarsha from Shak Dweep, supposedly in present day Iran, to establish Sun temples and to cure leprosy. I wonder if this is a Scythian connection! #askabhijit
Sun worshipper should have been your first clue to what religion they were and why they came to India lmao. Have yet to hear of another faith that worships surya and makes temples in his name other than Hindus. The Iranians were once part of Aryavarta so this is not surprising.
@@bharatv5563 Where did he tell about Aryan Invasion Theory?
Aryavarta means the Land of Perfection, and the name was given to India by Hindu Gods & Goddesses.
Hinduism is worshipping sun since eternity,
Zoroastrianism is 4000 yrs old derived from Vedic culture who worships sun
Kushans were also sun worshipers, huns were also sun worshippers
I'm hooked to Abhijit. Highly enlightening content! Thank you 🙏🏽
"The split of R1a (M420) is computed to c. 22,000[1] or 25,000[2] years ago, which is the time of the last glacial maximum. A 2014 study by Peter A. Underhill et al., using 16,244 individuals from over 126 populations from across Eurasia, concluded that there was "a compelling case for the Middle East, possibly near present-day Iran, as the geographic origin of hg R1a".
The Genetic code will rewrite the Indian History
#Biology
Keep up the good job 👍🏻
This is interesting or makes more sense i think. I took dna test and also mytrue ancestry. I am Eastern European (Hungarian mother as i know), with germanic, french, and some more, and 1% northern indian from my mothers side (Hungarian/Eastern European), and when i took true ancestry, my top or closest ancient populations are Franks, Scythians, Thuringii, Belgae, and Gauls, my top closest one as Scythians + Franks. I am trying to look into each and now find some writing or relations like Hungarians with Scythians, but then also now Indians especially with the Scythians, and hear eastern europe are scythians. I didnt think I would trace back a bit to the 1% northern indian since it was so little. I feel like I did now finding scythians originate or come from there even if my Eastern european and germanic possibly is also from them.
What also makes me wonder is, if I am not mistaken, I hear scythians or sakas as called are said to come from another planet, and came to earth and became star warriors. Eventually kicked out of India, I hear due to sins?. It reminds me, there is some idea how Hungarians descended from one of Noah's sons, and another comment I saw under a scythian video mentioning a long list about scythians and some hungarian, and the top was about how Hungarians who are scythians have to abandon the scythian pagan ways and false deities in order to return to christ. It reminds me how the flood came due to "fallen angels" corrupting or teaching humanity, and makes me wonder if sakas have any relations to these events. Though, I could be terribly wrong and pieceing together wrong information
Huns= Hungary nothing to do anything with iranian scythians
Very well said. Thanks. Problem is that history writers have relied only on western studies. They have ignored what was obvious. Iran people are Aryans. French language has many sanskrit words. Tom is om , John is jyan means gyan . Simon is shriman, ignis is Agni. I am is ahm ,,,me French philosopher Gur jiaf is guru ji and so on. One should not forget role of Tax shila university at Peshawar which trained thousands of scholars to rule every sphere of life in central Asia iran ,iraq middle East, Greece and parts of Europe. Particularly rulling and. Business class.
Word is Arya and not aryan. It's an adjective to refer to people who were noble &pious and dharmic. Even buddhist pali texts mention the word Arya in a positive sphere and as an adjective. But during the colonial rule Max Muller was the demon who gave a new meaning of Arya changed its pronunciation to aryan and created the dogmatic picnic theory.
@@Arjun-pi2iq maxmular was a vedic scholar. He had to manage a sanskrit brahman teacher from Pune. Because all Brahmins refused to teach him vedas. You are right aryan is his invention but don't forget he was a German . Though well versed in English . But it should be recognized that he introduced knowledge of Veda to the western world. He even directed British civil service officers to respect brahmins. Otherwise britishers had very disrespect for Brahmins. I suppose that it was God's design to unfurl the glory of indian spiritual knowledge in the western world and preserve the holy books .
@@Vankatraman Aah!, I had also similar misconceptions as you. First of all say what's the significance in spreading something which is of dubious quality , full of absurdities and ungenuine? If you would read his misinterpreted mantras then you will only find stories without any head or tail and only meat,beef,slaughter, racism etc.
Yes, I studied whole of Mr. Muller from "The life and letters of Max Muller". He was a poor German who came to Bharat for some pennies, and he didn't had any peny to return back there and he one day met Lord Macaulay and that changed his life. He began his new work.
So here's what he says about Macaulay(the man who wanted to create a class - Indians in blood but English in taste). Such great praises to him.⬇️
“…I made acquaintance this time in London with Macaulay, and had along conversation with him on the teaching necessary for the young men who are sent out to India. He is very clear headed, and extraordinarily eloquent…I went back to oxford a sadder, and, I hope, a wiser man." (The life and letters of Maxmuller, vol.1, p.162, London edition).
Next, let's come to the point where we get the revealation that he was a christian agent. Dr. Pusey wrote to Maxmuller. “I cannot but think that your lectures on the Vedas… are the greatest gift which had been bestowed on those who would win to Christianity the subtle and thoughtful minds of the cultivated Indians.”
(The life and letters of Maxmuller, vol.1, p. 237-238, London edn.)
Today even people think Maxmuller as friend of Hindus; a scholar extraordinary in Vedas, the letter of Maxmuller written to his wife in 1866 exposed his aspirations.
“I hope I shall finish that work (translation of Rigveda), and I feel convinced, though I shall not live to see it, that this edition of mine and the translation of the Veda will hereafter tell to a great extent on the fate of India, and on the growth of millions of souls in that country. It is the root of their religion, and to show them what that root is, I feel sure, is the only way of uprooting all that has sprung up from it during the last 3000 years”. (The life and letters of Maxmuller, vol.1, p. 328, London edn.)
So, I hope now its clear that what Max Muller actually wanted to do wearing a secular facemask like our politicians- to produce an interpretation and representation of the veda reading and knowing which the hindus would feel guilt and shame of their religion and abondon their ancient dharma and adopt christianity and finally he hoped India could become a christian country.
@@Arjun-pi2iqthanku for such indepth references and explanations.
What romans and Greeks called Gauls had Latin & Sanskrit like words that explains France & Gaelic
How are you so confident that R1a has an indian origin? And why south indians don't have R1a ? How is it possible that north indians travelled upto east Europe, but can't go south india? Please answer this question
@@srishtibhandari9965 agree with this
Indians living In Southern Part do have r1a1. Infact, Chenchu tribe has R1A1 In very high frequency.
@@niranjansrinivasan4042 nah , they claimed that on basis of Autosomes not R1a Haplogroup .
@@niranjansrinivasan4042 south Indian almost all indian have r gene ,r1 gene ( tribal have most ) , r1a mutation version of r/r1 , gene mutation happened in north ( may be in Himalayas ) later those (r1a) Holder migrated all over the world including south india
Im from kerala i have r1a haplogroup
#AskAbhijit Why did the British decide to leave India? Some people say it was congress and Gandhi's non violence tactics, others say it was a financially weak Britain which was starting to see mutiny in its navy inspired by SCB. What's the truth?
World War 2
The British saw that in the British-Indian Army ranks there could be a rebellion after World War II, so it because apparently clear to British that if the Army rebelled their staff in India which numbered in less would be impact heavy losses. So that is why British left India.
The latter
@@tss4629 nope it's because of British had a massive Debt because of WW2
In veda it is mentioned that people of various races came settled in India over time. In veda they have been given names initially but when there was flood of various ethnicity poured in veda stopped mentioning them. So from vedic literature people from various races came and settled in India. People might have gone out of India also but there is no mention of that.
Vedas were written in the land of Punjab
Give lines where mentioned
@Rajesh Pal .
@@sardar_gurjot some Vedas not all because some of it was written in south and some in Benares
The whole dasrajana war mention migration of almost 9 tribes
#AskABhijit
Sir could you please share some knowledge about Bengali people's history. We barely know anything about them as we are never taught in schools but I believe they were great people and especially great businessmen
Why not use the Internet, it's not that difficult. But here's one interesting fact that Bengal used to be the centre of Bharat as that's how big Bharat once was. The father of our nation is from Bengal!
I was just about to ask for that....thanks.
Gangadirai empire and pala empre of Bengal were 2 very powerful empires of its time.
Learn about Shashanka (the first emperor of Bengal)
No archaeology is done in Bengal
Refer Dashrajan yudh in Rigveda for more clarity on the origins of Scythian, Huns, Shakas etc
you are fool they were indus/harappa people who migrated 3000 years ago to tarim basim
Kushans were Yuezhi people from the Tarim basin in North Western China, Xiongnu people (170 BC) displaced them to Bacteria where they knocked off Hellenistic kingdoms (aka Indo-Greeks) and got assimilated (Indianized) over a period of time. It is not strange at all for Yuezhi nomads to assimilate swiftly with advanced sedentary civilizations like the Indian civilization. Proto-Indo-European people (Yamanayas) moved out of Steppe to various places (EU, SE Asia) and assimilated with the indigenous cultures. There is no way Indo-Europeans who came from harsh arid lands like the steppe would have volunteered to go back to the steppe by giving up the fertile Indian lands and advanced sedentary civilization. There is no shame in accepting that Homo Sapiens came out of Africa and moved across the world and a bunch of them (aka proto Indo-European speakers) reached India and assimilated with the existing proto-cultures. We are all related to each other and no one is superior or inferior to another. We learned from each other, pivoted, and became the dominant animals on this planet.
Agree. Indian subcontinent appears to be ashamed of the past. Now attempting rewrite and rewrite of history.
they were indus/harappa people who migrated
you are fool they were indus/harappa people who migrated 3000 years ago to tarim basim
What I belive that North Indians Himalayan people are scythians such as newars , pahadi , kumaoni , garhwali , all the way till tarim basin Xinjiang etc. beacause our gods around few hundred years back were totally different we had local deities
just see the video about the scythians of the " Kings and Generals " channel because it explains very well detailed info on the ancient scythians and there are records of the scythians having White Skin and Blue 🔵 eyes from BOTH Greek and Chinese sources
@@Ali-ld6tg really? Unka skin brown nahi hai kya
@Ali-ld6tg no they don't nuristani and kalaysh have blond hair white skin
they were indus/harappa people who migrated
#AskABhijit Sir can u tell us more about dasrajna yudh or battle of 10 kings, the vedic tribes who fought the war, and who were the ancient pakthas and yaddos
Hello Abhijit, found the map showing the indo greek empire with outline of the kushan empire in Wincester Cathedral Treasury
A iranian girl to show me her DNA
She said me she is 88% West Asian
and 7% Turkish and 3% earopean and 2% South asian but I told her how is this possible West asian Arabs are samtian and iranian are aryan I think DNA mai kuch jhol hai!
#AskAbhijit if our eyes form inverted and real image than how can we see an object erect??? What physics is used??
Sir plz take this question 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Your brain processes it To give u sensation of vision which is upright
@@ayoojindia3583 what's that process bro...
That's my question
@@krinsvirani5673 you see upside down only
The govt should invest in these researchs as it will boost the Indian image and create a more nationalistic bond among people
you are fool they were indus/harappa people who migrated 3000 years ago to tarim basim
#AskAbhijit Were the Assyrians and their rulers like Asurbanipal of Indian origin?
Ultimately, yes. They were one of several outcasted or Vratya groups that migrated via Iran and turned to Asura worship. Essentially, all Eurasian pantheons from western IVC to Mesopotamia to Syria/Anatolia and northeastern Europe - were all of Asuric origins. In Norse mythology, Odin, father of Thor (their apabhransha version of Indra), was literally the leader of the 'Aesirs'.
@@ALeaud There's no such thing as an "Indian nationalist". Get your basics in order before you decide to get butthurt by the history of culture in the ancient world. Also, maybe try not to strawman the 'Indian origin' of Assura worship in Eurasia with dumb retorts like "Assyrians weren't Indians lmao". The founding culture of the nascent Assyrian state was certainly of Vedic origins, even though the groups that took it there got assimilated over time and were eventually Semitized at least linguistically and ethnically. I'm sure you're clueless about Sumerians having been found to be of the same genetic stock as the IVC population. The conquering/ruling aristocracies of the Hittite, Kassite & Mitanni were all Sanskrit apabhransha speaking (read late Vedic aka Indo-Aryan) out of India (Indo-Iranic) martial groups that spread out after the fall of IVC cities once the Saraswati all but dried up ~2000 BCE. Earlier, they also went out as political outcasts or imperial explorers (Vratya), like after the Dasharajnya and Kurukshetra wars as described in astounding detail in texts like the Rg Veda and Mahabharata. History deniers like you can keep seething.
@@ALeaud Mittanis were widely agreed as Info Aryans , now how did they reach Iraq without conquering Iran ?
@@thedescanteerproof or source
@@thedescanteerif you know give me a source of Kushans first being from India
Scythians - (Saka) were migrants due to internal conflicts with their cousins the Parthians. I’m the descendant of the Saka tribe and my DNA strongly suggests Afghanistan and Other Iran Mesopotamia- Caucasian. R1A blood line. India is not the birth lineage of R1A I understand they ruled the region from central to South but that doesn’t justify your claim that Sakas are Indian. Thanks!!!
In fact The Sakas are Eastern-Iranic group of people which started in current Central Asia states of Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan around 6000 years ago…. ❤
Hmm... According to local legends in Indonesia, Aji Saka/Ajiwaka/Ajivaka from Bumi Majeti/Kali Serayu river in Jambudwipa is our unifying figure especially for the people of Java and Sunda. He introduced aksara Hanacaraka/Javanese script, agama tirta/belief of Hyang/animism-dynamism, and Saka calendar to Java island/Jawadwipa...
Yunan and Irrawaddy-Mekong river in Indochina are also our ancestors second homeland before our ancestors moved to the rest of Greater Sunda Islands/present day Indonesia...
Saka-Yavana-Daha (Sunda-Java), Malaya-Kamboja-Champa (Malay) are the main ethnic groups in Southeast Asia...
After the Cholamandala-Sriwijaya war, we moved the center of agama Buddha from Nalanda to Borobudur and the center of belief in Hyang/Hong/Ong/Om from Kalasan to Mt. Semeru/Mahameru in East Java. And also we named the strait between Sumatra/Swarnadwipa and mainland Asia with Malacca/Melaka strait (Melaka/Malacca = mleccha/foreigners)...
Dunno whether Scythian in this version is similar to Saka from Aji Saka legend (Indonesian/Sunda-Javanese legend)... In Kosambi region, Bandung City, the capital of West Java/Sunda also has this legend...
However, the social stratification between Indian and Sunda-Javanese (Indonesia) is very different... We have raja-resi/begawan or senapati ing alaga sayyidin panatagama... Raja/king has role as panatagama/religious administrator... We use this system till this very day, especially during the Mataram Islam kingdom (the largest Islamic Sultanate in Southeast Asia)... Maybe the root of this system came from Medang Keling/Medang Mataram kingdom... An ancient kingdom made by the people of Java and Sunda together with the refugees from Keling/Kalingga kingdom after Muria-Keling/Maurya-Kalingga war...
What was the borders of kushana empire under kanishka sir ?
#AskAbhijit Sir we all know religious polarisation in any country is dangerous. It has the potential to destroy a country from within. Is religious polarisation happening in india? Is it bad for india? If yes then what do we need to do?
Please sir answer this. This is very much important.
religious polarisation of which religion?
#AskAbhijit Sir, where does the term 'Scapegoat' comes from?
I thought it would be a history question so I asked. It's not to insult you with unrelated comments.
I genuinely think you may answer.
Scapegoat means sarificial goat. Meant to be slaughtered in short. It gives in meekly to its butcher.. thats how
Jai Hind 🇮🇳🚩
Sir some peoples said Kerala caste Nair's & Thiyas has 16% scythians DNA of their Gene..
Because some Scythian moved later on and mixed
How much native dna have nair?
@@tejamajhi2271 I think 66% - 68% ...
#AskAbhijit Sir, Please make a video on the Credibility of Aryan Invasion Theory.
British
#AskAbhijit , Sir can you please tell me about the origin of the Rajputs ? Were they Parthians or Scythians ?
Epthalites
@@Ali-ld6tg Bharat means not only India, akhand Bharat was very large
They were indians only because they represented best of indian society they represented best of indian culture so many outsiders and some historians who are Anti - Hindus they try to criticize rajputs but they are not able to provide proofs you yourself tell me if rajputs were outsiders then where are ancient kshatriyas gone brother they are the same people they are ancient kshatriyas only due to shift in language from sanskrit to hindi and many other language the words like rajputra, rajanya, raju changes and it is called rajputs in hindi
Historians just try to take the words so seriously but if u ask them they are not able to provide proofs
@@indianhistory2190in my States, maximum royal family are from gond dynasty (gond tribe). Gond is a proto Dravidian tribe. And ancient times, all kingdom of my States origined from tribe
Native tribe
I had seen a video of a guy reenacting scythian armored horseman , when he started charging for attack it had so much kshatriya vibe it's like i can't explain through words until upto point and your video i always saw scythians as foreign invaders
Maybe am of Scythian ancestry because I have brown eyes 👀
Chal be 😂
@Hiren Ahir Yadava i.e the Ahirs are Indo Aryans they're related to Yuhezi i.e the Kushanas
North Indians have this type of characters, maybe u can have but pure scythian genetics is lost due to intermixing, though their origins is also indo-eurasians
@@Aryan-cr5gr as Abhijit sir said R1a is of Indian origin My ancestor cannot be a ‘foreigner’ 😓
@@utkarshyadava2488 that is a patrilineal lineage ie fathers side mothers side is yet to known, scythians were eurasians from their mother side
First artefact of zvastika we're found in Cucuteni culture in nowadays Romania, Ukraine and Moldova(eastern part of Romania. The pelasgian people,ancestors of the getae(today we are called romanians)
Please discuss on the incident in Mahabharat where Jayadrath was killed by Arjuna. Isn't the sun set or covered by Sudarshan chakra incident is same like in Northern polar region?
they were indus/harappa people who migrated
# Ask Abhijit , Gurudev since we know that our education system is made in concern of our faculty - school colleges , coaching classes . There is only wastage of money and time . Can you please tell us what is real education and how can I teach myself the things , skills and subject for my own development.
I am Nair from India; I think Scythians are my Ancestors.
Scythian's Were Brown Light Skin ( Not White Skin ) They Had Brown Eye's, They Had Dark Hair
In Chinese Scythian's Known As Yuezhi And In Chinese Yuezhi It's Means Invaders Or Foreigner |
It's Well Known There Was No Friction Or Conflict Between Scythian's Population That Came In To India And Settled Down
They Had Smiler Culture ( Sun, Fire Worshipping ) And Ethnicity
If They Had Been Different Ethnicity Or Different Culture Then You Would Have Large Scale Roiting, Lot's Of Ethnics Strife Or Lot's Of Religious Strife But There Was Non Of These, They Settled In West India And Established Kingdom Hormonally With The People Of India
All Of This Taken Together Shows That Ethnically, Genetically, Culturally, Linguistically, Religiously Very Much As The Indian's |
I am a Hindu gujjar from Indian punjab , and I can say that my ancestors were kushans, who were followed old Rigvedic culture, I don't know how can some people says that the kushans and scythians Invaded India😡😡, They
Came back India to conquer their own territory, because they went utside Bharata for some reasons because in ancient times there were no boundaries to define a definite territory.
Just because the highest concentration lies in a place does not mean it is the place of origin of a genticmarker, nor does its diversity.
Thinking that way would mean because Australia is mostly European now and has the highest diversity , mean Caucasions originated in Australia.
What happened in Australia is he original inhabitants were systematically and deliberaely exterminated and replaced.
It might mean similar things might have happened in India, or it was a peaceful assimmilation.
Scythians are a Persian people. Persians and Indians have a shared ancestry.
Sir how can we learn more about history???
What are the best ways and resources???
Sir on Turks . Some of Us living In Uttrakhand Too have Blond hairs buy mostly girls have Them not boys generally . I think the Tushara(Turks) have it cause They were basically An Army of Exiled maleechas From India who just Invaded foreign lands and Married locals By even Kidnapping And war booties As they didn't followed Vedic rules of Not Harrasing common people
you are fool they were indus/harappa people who migrated 3000 years ago to tarim basim
That's why latin people look like Indians but white just a little bit touch of lighter skin but still being kinda brown unlike how romans or latins are popularized as white people with blonde hair and stuff and stuff.
Thanks for the information sir.
well according to turkish linguistics turkish/turkic languages has more shared words with sanskrit than modern english and loads of more shared words with dravidian languages make them guess if in the past two agglunative language family "turkish languages and dravidian language family" seperated from a common origin? sanskrit protoindoeuropean proto persian do not seem to be originated in central asia. also take into account that very similiar languages expected to have common origins korean, turkish, japanese, mongolian cannot be proved to be from a protolanguage although there should be one. today it is assumed korean could be linked to another dravidian language called as tamil! there is a possibility macro altaic could be solved by dravidian language family and it is more likely dravidian people migrated out of india or into india! sanskrit speaking people's route was like westward to iran anatolia balkan germany england ... cant have anything to do with central asia. it is also more likely dravidians came into india from north or northwest later while the other part of them moved to east and conqured and assimilated by prototurkish people! hence yamnaya could be dravidian instead of sanksrit or indoeuropean or protopersian!!!!
Even tho they spread out different directions they share a Cultural, linguistic and genetic lineage.
Good information 👍
Huns? My friend is from khatria caste and his gotra is Hun are these people related?
@@rhutwijtulankar1326 yeah, but I asked about similarities between Huns and hun clans
@@rhutwijtulankar1326 no he is fat and hairy and looks like one of us indian specifically north Indian, maybe his ancestors mingled with someone who was quite local looking.
@@rhutwijtulankar1326 Huns are pronounced as Hans , like Chauhans
hun clan is present among gurjars n rajputs.
Not in rajputs@@ritikchhokar
#AskAbhijit Are ancient Egyptians Hindus and of Indian ancestry?
They also had redhair which is caused by mix genetics
Please speak about the Kalita dynasty, it's origins.
Hey!!
#AskAbhijit
Can you tell about the origins of Khatri/Arora caste people?
Originally from North Western Undivided India.
Now scattered throughout current Indian Union after partition.
Mainly North, North West and West India.
i read a book called "rascial history of India "
in which he say that khattis is corupt word for khatris
these khattis ruled iran(not sure have to read again ) for 500 years as a shepherd king
u can read this book available online
@@aditya9615 hmm.
Will check it out fs.
Khatri comes Kshtriya , the Mughals couldn't pronounce Kshatriya and hence it became Khatri
@@aryanchakraborty5175 khatri are a merchant caste since thousand years, their origin is probably kshatriya but their varna is basically vaishya same like baniyas
How can you say that Scythians are of Indian ORIGIN, then go on to say that they INVADED India, not once but TWICE. Where did they invade FROM?? All sources point to scythians being of Iranian Origin, yet here you are contradicting yourself 🤦🏻♂️
I do agree with you absolutely
#AskAbhijit Is there any connection of Jats with Sycthians and Kushans?
Yes, probably some mixture. one theory theory they Rajputs, Jatts and Gujars cud be decendents of Scythjans or white Huns
@@andyhawkins7988 🤣
Rajput is most mixed breed of Indian subcontinent. But they are mixed up of Indian origin castes only.
Jats are not descendents of Sycthians.
Infact, Sycthians may be Jats.
@@dineshchahal2488 bhaii mai chamar hu hu par mai bahut goraa huu meri height bhi 6 hai haryana see😂😂 mai kya huwa firr
@@devinderkumar4607 tere purvaj kisi non chamar ke sath shadi ki hogi isliye
scythians are the greek whom alexander had brought them here
#AskAbhijit Sir What religion did the world follow before the abhramic religions were founded like Islam and Christianity since Islam and Christianity are not older than 2000 years? #askabhijit
Bro.. Idolatry was also practices at that time.. Also in arab... That's why islam is against idolaters... And also Christians.
sir pls tell about the origin of Raghuvanshi information about it is not available internet very much #AskAbhijit
#askabhijit who was Arabian goddess whose idol and follower came to india when Mohammed started killing Arab??? I joined my himalayan Rajput friend's puja ceremony where they were chanting these lines... Didn't get much info. from them but came 2 know about Mohammed from them... Is it true???
Hattsss offf to u ...! Sir
Sir mere hisab se mai aap ko kuch baat batana chahunga mai chota tha tab ek history book(jo ncert nahin thi) usme likha tha ki Scythian log aaj ka iranian province Sistan & baluchistan k log the kyonki Sistan ko hi saka sthan bola jata tha orr vahan ki hirmand county me hi sabse purana agni mandir tha jahan Zoroaster paida hua tha, Zoroaster ka matlab hai sunahre ऊट vala baba, orr Sistan k registan me ऊट mil sakte hai orr vo varun devata ki puja ko jyada manyata deta tha jiska matlab hai sindh se uska connection jyada tha, orr sindh k hi sath balochistan laga hua hai, mai kahna chahta hun ki saka log surya pujak the zunbils ki tarah orr ye Zoroaster jaise hi the, Zoroaster ne bas sikkhism buddhism jaise hinduism ka extract rup hai vaise hi rigved ko extract kar k apna culture chalaya, saka log Sistan k log hai inka Central asia se koi lena dena nahi hai orr mai sir कुषाण ka uccharan vaidik sanskrti me kukhan hota hai, orr kukhan log caucasian log the, jaise old Greeks Hindu कुष ko indicus caucasus bolte the vaise hi क कुषाण caucasian hue, yavan romans unani hai,
Tel us who indian king can compare
Changis khan ...area wise n warrier level ...e.i. Samrat Vikrama ditya n Samudra gupt n kushan ...etc in details
When india or Pakistan muslims will realize that they ancestors not arbic or tukic they are Indian ancient Hindu
#AskAbhijit WHAT IS THE ORIGIN OF MARATHAS ??
Martha belived to be mix of Dravidian and Scythian , But it is state by Britishers
@@aditya9615 😂😂?
Maratha are kunbis ( farmers) , the Shivaji boshle was actually called Sudra king until his janeu ritual happened and one north Brahmin declared him khatriya with ancestory with sisodiya vansh ,but he was born Sudra and karmic khatriya
#Ask abhijit make a video on Netaji’s death
There is a vedio on him on defensive offence channel watch that
well with kushans their should not be any doubt they adopted indian culture and followed buddhism and hinduism also,if we can call mughals as indian dynasty then what's problem with kushans yes they immigrated but then adopted indian culture
#askabhijit Sir tell me how sanskit language 1ST came to india? Dose it was spoken anywhere around the globe except india?
Sanskrit did not "come to India". Sanskrit was born in greater North India (including current Kashmir, Afghanistan, western Punjab in Pak, Sindh, eastern Iran). And it was perfected in the region between the Ganga-Yamuna doab and modern-day Prayagraj, aka, Aryavarta as described in Baudhayana Kaplasutras.
out of India theory, sanskrit did not leave it's birth place.
Brahmin Pushyamitra Shung defeated the foreigner Greeks Menander and Dimitrios
#askabhijit can you please tell us about pre islamic religion and culture in Saudi Arabia .
#AskAbhijit were Scythians and Shakyas same people?
How many times you guys lied,indic lands are very prosper from very ancient times,so i have some questions ,first is that why the people of this land with great financial prosperity were getting out of it?,and second is the main weapon of these nomadic origin people's ae "Horse back archery" which we've found in their paintings so plz tell me did horse back archery had it's roots in ancient indic culture absolutely not,and the last one is that why northern indic languages(punjabi,Sindhi,kashmiri, Marathi, Gujarati,saraiki)are completely different roots in comparing with the southern languages(Tamil ,Kannada, malayalam,) i hope you can answer to this cunning looking normal history loving student,i hope you can if you consider your opinion as a true side of history.
#askabhjijit Sir can u tell us more about dasrajna yudh or battle of 10 kings, the vedic tribes who fought the war, and who were the ancient pakthas and yaddos
they are saka, pashtun ancestors.
Pashtuns are indian origin too
Kasana
kanswa
kansal
are the surnames present in indians even today
Kansal to shyd agrasen K bete ka naam tha kushan or Scythian jatt cast h
@@Gundaa_bhai_50000 bhai kushans were gujjars.. I am gujjar too and my subcast is kasana ie kushana.. just the pronunciation thing..
jats kambojas and pathaks also have kushan ancestry.. as some kushans might entered these groups or something else..
Jaat are kushan and scythian
@@notorious9278 yeah I know
@@pankajkasana4347 gochar are Huns nothing to do with kushans
Most of the North Western regions of India are due to the migration or invasion are mixed with Scythians, Kushans as well as Greek, Bactrians and the Huns. The Greek soldiers went all the way to Goa and took a boat back to Greece. Some soldiers stayed and some Goan's like the Konkani Brahmins have mingled with the Greeks as well ! India is a huge country and its long history resulted in mixing with various corners of India. Deep southern India is pretty much Indo-African in Adaman Islands, Tamil Nadu, Kerala and Sri Lanka, and Indo-Chinese in the Eastern regions of Tibet, Nepal, Tripura, Orissa, Meghalaya, Bengal and Burma
What is the reality of Maratha raid in Bengal ?
Qasim died before bappa rawal borned. How did bappa rawal defeated qasim. #askabhijit
Defeated his army I think
#AskAbhijit Do you have any books/articles/papers recommendations on Haplogroup L-M357
All are descendents of RAJA YAYATI
Abhijit ji what do you think about scientists claiming that bc there is more variation in eurasia of r1a and that's why oit is false?
#AskAbhijit please talk about truth and conspiracy of Subhash Chandra Bose's death
#AskAbhijit what is antimatter? How can it be produced?
#AskAbhijit sir do you think that this universe is one of a cell of some human being and does everyone of our cells have a seperate universe in itself ? May be its too microscopic for us to see in and our universe is too big for us to see out .
Ppl of Kansana clan are the decendents of Kushans
yes, kasana clan have villages around delhi and MP.
Agree 👍 @shriraj mahajan... kasana is basically kushana.. kushana is pronounced as kusana and now we write it as kasana
#AskAbhijit , Sir can you correct me if I am wrong but when Arabs of Umayyad Caliphate invaded India the invasion was halted . But in case of the Turks this didn't happen . Was it only because at that point of time there was not a powerful empire in north India or because of rigid caste system as we are told .
#AskAbhijit Sir do tocharian/ tushara were also scythians
R1a is of South Siberian origin.
It migrated eastern Europe, central Asia, Iran and then India.
Not the other way around.
Nice
Kushans and Iranian Huns from Kashmir
They are not indian origin they just come from the same ancestors
I think it is thé contrary
#Askabhijit who are yadavs/ahirs are they shudras or kshtriyas or vaishyas.
Who are yaduvanshi nandavanshi gwalavanshi yadavs and gopas?
Was narayani sena made up of ahirs/yadavas
No one is shudra, kshatriya,brahman today, It was all varnas not castes. And you can't use system of vedic Period today because scenario is completely different.
@@indianbaba7093 all are mul nivasis.
No one is foreigner
Majority of Indian actually Dravidian
Sir khatris ke ancestors kaun hote h
Khash aryan
Afghanistan people are our ancestors.
#AskAbhijit
Is words of Persian and sanskrit similar ?
Nope
Meri gotra " Shak " hai sir
#Askabhijit are pashtuns descendants of bactrians ??