I was going to say that same thing. I love the organic feeling of growth and overgrowth it has on this new iteration. It felt really weird to go out and place a district just about anywhere.
Im actually sceptical... the cities look very chaotic and too colourful with buildings in many colors, and with orange, green and yellow terrain tiles.... why dont they just stick to a modernized version of civ5? that graphics were god-tier.
I really hope they limit the amount of districts you can place. One of the things i hated about humankind was that by the end game, districts filled the entire continents, and there wasnt a single piece of natural land left. Its not reality.
@@willd0047 The natural landscape juxtaposed to the elegant wonders you can build. The Petra/Delicate Arch combo for example with a national park right next to it to really give that “role playing” aesthetic
That seems to be the purpose of towns vs cities, where towns cant really get many districts, instead working natural resources, and cities needing outside sources of food and happiness to maintain specialists
@ I get that, and Im fine with the concept of city sprawl, but if youve never played humankind, then you wont understand what I’m saying. When I say an *entire* continent was nothing but city districts, I’m not exaggerating. That was the endgame. 0 natural tiles left in the world except for water tiles. It looks ridiculous. Honestly I think some of the cities in these Civ trailers look amazing. I just hope that the large sized cities they shower are the absolute maxxed out cities, because any bigger and theyll start to swallow the continent like I was saying.
Yeah, in Humankind you end up with cities the size of countries. I get why people moved away from a city being one 'square', but it's more realistic for the city size compared the land.
I can confidently say this is best looking civ to date. That is starting to get my hyped. Also the leaders having in depth skill trees also hype. It’s like they combined leaders with governors I am hype for that aswell.
@Jasonwolf1495 yeah, you get universal bonuses instead of every city doing different things where it would be more practical to have Victor's abilities in two of your cities and Pingala's abilities in three cities
@@perezcptit just looks really simplistic and it doesn’t really fit with the vibes of the rest of the game. Ex. The amazing graphics on the map vs the gui that basically just looks like a few lines put together.
@@perezcptI think the important icons look too similar are are too small (ex happiness and gold). Additionally I feel like compared to how artistic and grand the rest of the game looks, the UI seems plain and sterile. I think they could do a lot with color on the policy cards to help differentiate them
@@perezcpt minimalism has been a bane of modern UI design. Makes a lot of games look souless. In case of civ 7 thou the contrast between the text and background is pretty bad and makes things hard to read which is horrible for a game that is very reading heavy.
I'll subscribe if you address the horrible moneymaking that civ is doing ripping off their fans. I really want someone to ask the civ team in an interview about all the overpriced base game and dlcs
Thanks for the forecast! I have a quick question: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). What's the best way to send them to Binance?
I really don't like leader agendas. They were stupid and nonsensical in civ6 and don't seem to be any better in civ 7. Pachacuti hates that I own mountainous terrain on the other side of the planet, and he'll always hate me no matter what I do. Why? I have no idea. I'd rather see him hold a grudge over something I actually did, like conquering one of his cities, raiding his coasts or allying myself to one of his enemies, and reacting more strongly to that, than this nonsense.
I don't know if it's the agendas that are bad so much as their implementation. You're right, they often make little sense, but I think that's more that they're clumsily included to add some conflict into the game rather than them being inherently bad.
Its so youre not autimatically friends with every civ from doing nothing all game. What if you did nothing "bad" most of the game? You building near mountains is the firced "bad" based on the leader preference. I'm not sure how else you'd do it.
If the frogs get Charlamagne AND William the Bastard, then we at least deserve Alfred the Great for Anglo-Saxon England. Hoping for Harold Godwinson from a DLC as well maybe so you can play the battle of Hastings.
ehm .. charlamange isnt a "frog" - he was born in todays germany, spoke german, died in todays germany. his capital was in germany (aachen). he ruled over a territory which includes - among others - todays germany, france, benelux, northern italy, balkan etc. - his heir divided the country in three parts - todays france, germany and benelux... carl the great - which is the english translation - was the first to be crowned "modern roman emperor" (after the fall of the roman empire), which led to the creation of the holy roman empire.
1:17 this ship looks like the US's Iowa-class battleships from WW2 onwards. I guess this is the "Battleship" unit then and not something else like a Destroyer.
is it true that were stopping like ww2 era?? instead of growing onward to like huge mechs ?? cuz i see that as amazing if true but I've only heard rumors
My initial reaction to Civ 7 was, "I'll give it one last try, and probably play less than 30 hours, again". Now, I haven't been this excited about a Civ game since Civilization on Super Nintendo.
Is it just me who really dislikes the look of the tanks/ships? They are massive and look pretty clunky. I think the map looks phenomenal and the actual units seem to be taking away from that.
Your telling me previous games were more immersive? Previous games made zero attempts at immersion while this one does in a few ways. It is far from historically accurate but civ games have never been. I think this game just brings it to your attention.
@@ginjaico_6132 I can understand that it can be jarring when an ancient egyptian woman lives into the modern age ruling over 3 different empires that inhabited that general region. However, how is George Washington ruling over the USA beating Egyptians to the punch and building the pyramids and then conquering Rome from the Romans better?. Empires rose and fell and morphed into new empires, that is how history happened.
This is not going to happen but i really want young Queen Elizabeth the second to be the English leader i think she would make an amazing Morden age leader
You can reach the modern age in civ 9 before cities skylines 2 dlc release. What do you think about steams new season pass rules and the false advertising on the store page saying it will come out this quarter when they said they have no idea when it's gonna release.
They finally designed proper battleships. Unlike those fat, ugly, eyesores in Civ VI. What a joke those were. Now they actually look like the USS Missouri and USS New Jersey. Go figure.
Idk guys, this looks like the old game just with a few “new” (rebranded) mechanics from the old games.. typical this day in age of gaming unfortunately
I can't believe the Civilization UA-camrs have become SELLOUTS. Civilization VII is absolute garbage. Some points to this fact include the forcing of Denuvo (junkware DRM), requiring a 2K account (so they can harvest your data), Ages/Eras suck and are unwelcome as they go against the very concept of the series, AND PAID DLC FROM DAY ONE. Sorry, but these are objective indicators that a game is a HARD NO. It's corporate trash, plain and simple, and will never be on the level of Civilization V (the last good one.) Stop being a shill and be a gamer again; I just can't watch or listen any longer. This game is pure garbage and I don't like sellouts.
I love how the cities here can actually look like a bustling metropolis and not just a few buildings taped together like in Civ 6
Me too!
to bad there is not even one citizen walking in the city ;]]]]
I was going to say that same thing. I love the organic feeling of growth and overgrowth it has on this new iteration. It felt really weird to go out and place a district just about anywhere.
Im actually sceptical... the cities look very chaotic and too colourful with buildings in many colors, and with orange, green and yellow terrain tiles.... why dont they just stick to a modernized version of civ5? that graphics were god-tier.
I really hope they limit the amount of districts you can place. One of the things i hated about humankind was that by the end game, districts filled the entire continents, and there wasnt a single piece of natural land left. Its not reality.
Give it time /s
Yeah it’s a shame too cause the natural landscapes are the best part of the game visually
@@willd0047 The natural landscape juxtaposed to the elegant wonders you can build. The Petra/Delicate Arch combo for example with a national park right next to it to really give that “role playing” aesthetic
That seems to be the purpose of towns vs cities, where towns cant really get many districts, instead working natural resources, and cities needing outside sources of food and happiness to maintain specialists
@ I get that, and Im fine with the concept of city sprawl, but if youve never played humankind, then you wont understand what I’m saying. When I say an *entire* continent was nothing but city districts, I’m not exaggerating. That was the endgame. 0 natural tiles left in the world except for water tiles. It looks ridiculous. Honestly I think some of the cities in these Civ trailers look amazing. I just hope that the large sized cities they shower are the absolute maxxed out cities, because any bigger and theyll start to swallow the continent like I was saying.
Yeah, in Humankind you end up with cities the size of countries.
I get why people moved away from a city being one 'square', but it's more realistic for the city size compared the land.
I can confidently say this is best looking civ to date. That is starting to get my hyped.
Also the leaders having in depth skill trees also hype. It’s like they combined leaders with governors I am hype for that aswell.
So maybe I'm just dumbing it down, but it seems like the leader points are basically just governor bonuses without the governor.
Thats good, they are combining elements of civ 6
Yes but it's universal for your civ
@@Paul-gk3tj yes thus without the governors part. They're not assigned to a city.
@Jasonwolf1495 yeah, you get universal bonuses instead of every city doing different things where it would be more practical to have Victor's abilities in two of your cities and Pingala's abilities in three cities
@@Jasonwolf1495 you seem to forget that governors were an dlc addition. this is a new base game, which does not have all the features of civ 6.
I've been drooling over the details in naval battles. the game looks like just a update to Civilization 6 but still. Kudos for the level of detail.
Good to hear a Kiwi accent coming up on 100k subscribers. Well deserved too!
I hope they change the GUI because it looks terrible
i agree its weirdly the worst part of the game, but you know they wont change it
I am software developer who works in UI quite a bit. In your opinion, how could they improve the UI? What do you not like about it in particular?
@@perezcptit just looks really simplistic and it doesn’t really fit with the vibes of the rest of the game. Ex. The amazing graphics on the map vs the gui that basically just looks like a few lines put together.
@@perezcptI think the important icons look too similar are are too small (ex happiness and gold). Additionally I feel like compared to how artistic and grand the rest of the game looks, the UI seems plain and sterile. I think they could do a lot with color on the policy cards to help differentiate them
@@perezcpt minimalism has been a bane of modern UI design. Makes a lot of games look souless. In case of civ 7 thou the contrast between the text and background is pretty bad and makes things hard to read which is horrible for a game that is very reading heavy.
1:41 looks almost like a North Africa WW2 scenario
The only sad thing about Civ 7 is it's price.
I also hope it’s not short from age to age
I'll subscribe if you address the horrible moneymaking that civ is doing ripping off their fans. I really want someone to ask the civ team in an interview about all the overpriced base game and dlcs
Nice video - this game’s map is looking amazing
Thanks for the forecast! I have a quick question: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). What's the best way to send them to Binance?
I really don't like leader agendas. They were stupid and nonsensical in civ6 and don't seem to be any better in civ 7. Pachacuti hates that I own mountainous terrain on the other side of the planet, and he'll always hate me no matter what I do. Why? I have no idea. I'd rather see him hold a grudge over something I actually did, like conquering one of his cities, raiding his coasts or allying myself to one of his enemies, and reacting more strongly to that, than this nonsense.
I don't know if it's the agendas that are bad so much as their implementation. You're right, they often make little sense, but I think that's more that they're clumsily included to add some conflict into the game rather than them being inherently bad.
Its so youre not autimatically friends with every civ from doing nothing all game. What if you did nothing "bad" most of the game?
You building near mountains is the firced "bad" based on the leader preference. I'm not sure how else you'd do it.
Do you think that it will be cross-compatible between PS5 and XBox Series X
No updates to the Civ 4 AI announced though?
If the frogs get Charlamagne AND William the Bastard, then we at least deserve Alfred the Great for Anglo-Saxon England. Hoping for Harold Godwinson from a DLC as well maybe so you can play the battle of Hastings.
ehm .. charlamange isnt a "frog" - he was born in todays germany, spoke german, died in todays germany. his capital was in germany (aachen). he ruled over a territory which includes - among others - todays germany, france, benelux, northern italy, balkan etc. - his heir divided the country in three parts - todays france, germany and benelux... carl the great - which is the english translation - was the first to be crowned "modern roman emperor" (after the fall of the roman empire), which led to the creation of the holy roman empire.
Ok great, now when do we get the patch that allows us to play our favorite civ for the entire game?
8:35 loves feasts? frankish? it's king harlus in civ 7
Me: How much do you want to reach 100K subs?
JumboPixel: Yes!
I'm hoping they give us some Polynesian civs to explore with 😃
notice you have to do certain things to unlock options for new civ on era change
Am I the only one planning Leader + Civ playthrough options already? Like Pachacuti with Mayan -> Incan -> Mexican.
1:17 this ship looks like the US's Iowa-class battleships from WW2 onwards. I guess this is the "Battleship" unit then and not something else like a Destroyer.
is it true that were stopping like ww2 era?? instead of growing onward to like huge mechs ?? cuz i see that as amazing if true but I've only heard rumors
even IF true... just wait for the dlc...
My initial reaction to Civ 7 was, "I'll give it one last try, and probably play less than 30 hours, again". Now, I haven't been this excited about a Civ game since Civilization on Super Nintendo.
Is it just me who really dislikes the look of the tanks/ships? They are massive and look pretty clunky. I think the map looks phenomenal and the actual units seem to be taking away from that.
Ima be honest this game already looks hella fun and unique compared to previous civ games.
Even the ships look different between civs thats awesome.
They should introduce venice back tbh and give him a big boost with city states
Is there a Swiss flag at 4:15?
That Bomber Looks a Lot Like a German Gotha Bomber from WWI.
This is a “buy on sale” game for me. I play civ for immersion into history and so far I’m not getting it.
Your telling me previous games were more immersive? Previous games made zero attempts at immersion while this one does in a few ways. It is far from historically accurate but civ games have never been. I think this game just brings it to your attention.
@Smilemonster1912 I agree, this game seems more logical than all the others from an historical perspective. The civ changes for one.
@@ginjaico_6132 I can understand that it can be jarring when an ancient egyptian woman lives into the modern age ruling over 3 different empires that inhabited that general region. However, how is George Washington ruling over the USA beating Egyptians to the punch and building the pyramids and then conquering Rome from the Romans better?. Empires rose and fell and morphed into new empires, that is how history happened.
@Smilemonster1912 Sorry, I may not have been too clear. I agree with your points.
I wish they would change profile of leaders going through modern age. Like Putin or Kim from North Korea 🇰🇵 etc
This is not going to happen but i really want young Queen Elizabeth the second to be the English leader i think she would make an amazing Morden age leader
The more I hear about this game the more I like it ❤
hope we get more future stuff than the giant robot
Did they ever answer if you can pet the dog in this game? I don't want to play a game I cant pet a dog in.
Leader points -> Civ V's perk system. :(
I still despise this new civ every era idea. Everything else looks decent.
Dad-bod Charlemagne
Vikings?? where are the vikings? Im getting nervous they are ignored.. They would not like that
Yes they would
I came here to say this so I shall support the one that has already said it.
Hopefully the modern navies aren’t underpowered like in civ vi
Jambo dont say me you not pre ordered this game
You can reach the modern age in civ 9 before cities skylines 2 dlc release. What do you think about steams new season pass rules and the false advertising on the store page saying it will come out this quarter when they said they have no idea when it's gonna release.
looking at this i see DLC> future age, DLC 2> stone age DLC 3> endless potencital...zou alreadz feel money grab
Thats Civ for ya though
In the diplomacy tab, the leader needs to look AT ME. The current diplomacy tab is garbage
They finally designed proper battleships. Unlike those fat, ugly, eyesores in Civ VI. What a joke those were. Now they actually look like the USS Missouri and USS New Jersey. Go figure.
Belly physics > jiggle physics
Idk guys, this looks like the old game just with a few “new” (rebranded) mechanics from the old games.. typical this day in age of gaming unfortunately
Game is not yet out, they are already patching it lol.... (video title :D)
Ooooooh
Avoid the game unless they remove denuvo
I honestly assumed you had like 700k followers
Add hitler and stalin
And J-dawgs.
Cartoonish again. Hard pass.
THEY BETTER HAVE ASSYRIAN TANKS
ASSYRIAN
TANKS
You should be able to play as Adolf Hitler.
We need more sexy leaders
You want to see a return of Gilgabruh?
@Zimionz DADDY YES!!! I WANT ZADDY DADDY GILGADADDY!!! PACHACHUTI WENT FROM PAPA CUTIE TO PAPA CRACK.
Austrian painter would be nice.
This series is getting the D&D treatment, and it’s not looking great
I can't believe the Civilization UA-camrs have become SELLOUTS. Civilization VII is absolute garbage. Some points to this fact include the forcing of Denuvo (junkware DRM), requiring a 2K account (so they can harvest your data), Ages/Eras suck and are unwelcome as they go against the very concept of the series, AND PAID DLC FROM DAY ONE. Sorry, but these are objective indicators that a game is a HARD NO. It's corporate trash, plain and simple, and will never be on the level of Civilization V (the last good one.) Stop being a shill and be a gamer again; I just can't watch or listen any longer. This game is pure garbage and I don't like sellouts.