NL10 Zoom PokerStars.it | Play & Explain 🤓☑️
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 сер 2024
- Like, subscribe, and comment to support! 🎉💛🌞
📺 Twitch. - / positivepoker72
📷 Instagram - / positivepoker72
▶️ Discord - / discord
#poker #onlinepoker #twitch #twitchpoker #microstakes
#cashgame #cashgamepoker #pokerstars #pokerstarsitalia
#onlinepoker #pokersession #playandexplain
#positivepoker #staypositive
You will show your poker greatness BOT very interesting videos I Enjoyed IT
Thank you Amir, really appreciate it. 👍🙂
Nice video, keep it up!
Tyyyyy! 🙂
Random video I watched Enjoyed enough to get through until the end
Haha, nice, thanks for supporting. 👍😅
hello dude, congratulations for the very interesting videos, honestly I think you have a lot to give to the community, more than you yourself think, you are a competent and above all positive person, having said that, it would be cool if you brought on the channel or on twitch some sessions also at NL 25 and 50 or even cooler it would be if you did a BR challenge starting type from NL 10. The choice is just ideas, see you soon you are a great.
Thank you so much for the nice words. 💛
And thanks for the input.. 👍
I have some exciting projects in my mind, stay tuned for more to come! 🙌🏻 🙂
Forgot to post my questions ! Here they are :)
Btw I didn't found much, most of the gameplay was intuitive to me!
@3:50 - Why didn't you let him try to raise on the flop ? I don't think you are so afraid of any other card on the turn
@21:26 - I would have never cbet on this flop, too connected, nothing to win, just check/folding
@33:40 - Same as the other one but reversed (even though it hits the button range a ton, that's true), you have AQo after you 3bet him from the small blind, he just calls the 3bet (strong range no?) but flop comes out 786 and you decide not to cbet ?
Thanks Yann! :D
NL10 2tables would be nice to watch
Thanks for the feedback Nick! 🙂
I did one recently: ua-cam.com/video/BA6bKb6XdDQ/v-deo.html
could you simply explain how the rake(especially at NL2,5,10) makes a difference as well
Rake is tricky on Microstakes, I'm not a huge expert on it.
But since it's super high, generally we wanna 3bet more and defend less etc., because close Hands will become -EV. 🙂
I think you might be a bit too passive preflop when it comes to being 3bet. A player does not have to be a reg to know that 3betting KQ or AJ makes more sense than flat calling. If a fish 3bets and you have a mediocre hand, it's probably a fold cause fish like to call most of the time. But if any decent player 3bets, putting in some 4bet bluffs will increase your winrate. It seems to be that your line of flat calling 3bets is quite exploitable because you're banking on hitting the flop, which doesn't happen often. 4betting a decent player is much better because you can get hands like AJ, AT, KQ to fold preflop, and even if you get called you'll have an easier time bluffing them off of the pot because your 4bet reps an overpair. An example where you were exploited by calling a 3bet against a decent player was when the guy had AJo. By flatting you give him the power to bluff you, which is what happened. You call, the board is terrible, he C-bets repping an overpair, and you automatically went into a state of concern. If you think about it statistically, how often do people get JJ, QQ, KK, AA? Now compare that to how often decent players 3bet preflop with any non-paired hand? You'll see that there is a huge discrepancy so there is no need to be scared of 3bets, unless the player is an enormous nit. Ofcourse it depends on position, but more often than not, a 4bet bluff will get you A LOT of fold equity both pre and post flop because you're repping a better range.
Ps. the first thing that crossed by mind when he bets 90cents on the flop with AJ is that you should definitely bluff raise that. The board was not a good range for 3bet, so a bluff raise would've given you a lot of fold equity against KQ, AQ, AJ, AT, KJs which are all WAY more likely than high pocket pairs, statistically speaking. You got exploited in that hand and it all started by being too passive preflop. Post flop you could've exploited him because 3bets will cbet more often than not, bluff raising is better than calling on a board like that.
Will you run into a high pocket pair sometimes? Sure, but who cares? Do not be scared of slight variance. And another thing, don't give 10nl players so much credit haha.
Wow, what a detailed analysis, thanks for the effort. 🙂 Can you please put a timestamp on the hand? Can't find the AJ anymore. 😅
Definitely I might have missplayed some hands here, as well all do and I really love to have a good discussion. Regarding 4bets I do agree in some kind, but people might not 3bet enough in the first place, to 4 bet bluff more.. tight 3betting ranges make calling also worse though. Overall just have to be cautious I guess. 😅
@@PositivePoker72 The hand was at 18:25 bro. I do think people don't 3bet enough, especially on 10nl. But as I emphasized in my comment, I was referring to decent players only, 'cause unlike fish who only call, they do know that 3betting is a thing haha. I agree with you that being cautious is good, but being too cautious will make you exploitable. And to me it seems that you play a little bit too cautiously so only good hands will make you money. Poker is a game where noone can see your cards, so use that to your advantage. Put in some 4bet bluffs in a few close spots where the 3better is a decent player, especially if you're in the button. 1) you'll be playing in position, 2) 3bet bluffs are a lot more frequent from blinds against the button. If you get called and the board doesn't hit your range, it probably didn't get his range either cause he called your 4bet. If he checks, you can bet big, probably 65-75% to increase your fold equity. It's better to do this on rainbow boards, which will further increase fold equity. Again, we all have a different style, and yours seems to be quite straightforward, but I think you could be more profitable but being slightly more aggressive. Calibrate well the spots where you think my suggestion would make sense, and go for it. See if it works for you. Don't over do it, but do it here and there. Just one of these plays that go your way can make you from €1 (if he folds to your 4bet) to about €2.5 (if he calls it and then folds on the flop). At 10nl, this is 25% of the buy in, and that is a lot. Then you relax, play your regular style, and if another spot comes up where you're in the button and something tells you that the good player in the BB might be bluffing and you have a decent hand, go for it! Don't be scared of running into pairs, if you do run into them, you will know it. Calibration is key, but I think you have the intelligence and the knowledge to make these kinds of plays.
Remember, they can't see your cards, so don't play as if they can see through you. They can't.
Good luck!
Ps. just looked at the A7 hand again against his AJ and my bad, I misconfused something and thought you were in the button and he was in the BB. My apologies. I think since he raised your early position from the button, you could even consider folding your A7 in that spot. To resume, everything I said about 4bet bluffing from the button stands, but I made a mistake and used a wrong hand as an example! 😅
@@GaliReax Really good post again, thanks. Completely agree with 100% you said. This session I just wanted to play really solid, because it's a Play&Explain Video for microstakes players. Definitely being a bit more aggressive in good spots, where people tend to overfold will be even more profitable.🔥
But I didn't want to overwhelm people with all kind of exploits, so just playing a kind of conservative TAG Style in this one. 😅
And some spots I definitely missplayed too as I said. Awesome duscussion, thumbs up. 👍🙂
Very nice Session. But i think one table is better to explain Something to us 😉
Thank you Matze! 🙂
music, yes. lol *peace*
Haha 👍😅
Hi Good concepts, Some obseravtions, I would prefer 2Tables but if you use the fast fold button quicker, One is good enough to give you time to explain your thoughts, 10nl Zoom is insainly tight, very hard to get a range edge unless there are some Baluga's in the pool, The guy who shoved AKo over your QQ, should realy think about it, I have some stats to say villain cant make money with AKo in this spot, Eg when both have 100bb if you win the flip with AK your return is only 191bb, which gives you 91bb profit You are only 45% v QQ which means your return statistically shoud be 225 bb with a profit of 125bb, Which means v tight pool you are miles behind the curve, to make it worse you have much less % against KK & AA Full stacked Allins are almost always AA.KK, QQ or AK, Rarely will it be JJ or lower and virtually never AQ,
Nice, yeah, makes a lot of sense. Really good points. Definitely a lot of adjustments to make compared to higher stakes. 😅
Gonna try two tables next time! 🎉🙂
you want to know how I know you actually play these stakes? Because this is legitimate analysis. I have argued this over and over. I actually DO NOT have a winning graph lifetime on 10NL. However in every single other stake besides 500NL I do. I actually think this is the hardest pool because you either are playing a nit, a reg, or someone that will be so psycho aggressive there is absolutely no rhyme or reason to their play. I find 25NL far easier to play
Nice video 😀
Thanks for the feedback. 👍🙂
Hi mate, many thanks for the interesting video. just a point at the end with the 4bet spot with KK UTG. don't you think the NL10 field is a bit too tight in 4bet pot (JJ+ /AQs+) i think. i'm not sure that the shove turn is the right move. can you explain the thinking process behind your move please. in game you think about the possibility that he has ATs. but in that case you will have value against 12 combos (6 combos of QQ/ 3 ATs/3 AJs) but you have a cut against 14 combos (6 AA/3JJ/3 TT/1AKc/1 AQc). am i missing something in my TP as i cannot see a valuable shove here?
Hey, thanks, really appreciate it. 🙂
This is definitely a super interesting spot, really tricky and depends on a lot of assumptions, these were my main ones:
-AA I would expect to jam preflop mainly, more than a year ago people would not be used to flat AA in these spots.. especially NL10 I would have heavily discounted it
-JJ,TT are super likely calling the 4b, but on the Flop I would expect some of those to raise with that drawy texture
-Most Flush Draws are combo draws, which I would also expect to jam a lot on Flop
Now we can start counting combos with those assumptions.. which would leave us with his most likely hand being QQ (In theory might also sometimes jam preflop)...
So depending on these assumptions our jam could be reasonable or too thin, if they are biased towards one or another direction.
Making your assumptions it would definitely be right that the Shove might be too thin.
In theory to be super precise we still would need to evaluate general EV of the different plays..
(which has to take also many other aspects into consideration: how much Equity we realize by checking back Turn, how much Equity from Villain we fold out by jamming Turn etc. )
I would say it's a super close spot overall.
Don't have a certain answer for what's the best play without specific reads. 😅
@@PositivePoker72 many thanks for taking time for me. i'm looking forward to watch your other videos. those are full of golden informations for low stakes player like me.
@@baptistemoerenhout9171 Thanks Baptiste! Really glad you like them! 🙂
Hi, @5:25 isn't that a call for 40 more big blinds? Ur playing against fish, AJo, ATo, 77, 88, 99, TT, JJ are all plausible hands? I would maybe consider folding KQo in this spot, but against a fish this is definitely a call imo
edit: @55:52 why 4-bet so small man? Raise it up to 3.5€-4€ at least, you have caller to your open and 3-bet from BB!
Good point, definitely close spot.. I use a simple HUD ingame, maybe he was not that crazy until that point. 😅
We need around 40% equity, a tiny bit more because of Rake. Against the range you describe, we have exactly that. So really close. 😉
@@PositivePoker72 Ok you make sense. Can you see my edited question below the original question? :D
Can I ask what stakes are you playing right now?
I was a small winner over 80k hands (10.5BB/100) nl2 6-max and I had some thoughts of returning to PS, but honestly the rakeback system is just awful. I prefer 30-40% flat rakeback and not some coins or chests or whatever! Do you know what's the situation at the moment on pokerstars on low stakes? It's been almost 2 years since I last played on pokerstars.
@@PositivePoker72 Okay but considering that you already invested 1€, I would definitely make that call! Don't underestimate KQs :)
@55:52 I go small, because I want to give him the chance to do something stupid. If we go bigger he knows were comitted and it looks super strong. 😅
Its an akward stacksize, even jamming is reasonable.. But definitely if we think he doesn't care and calls any size we can go bigger.
Mi potresti spiegare il perché segni con il colore verde chi non è full stack? Quali sono i vantaggi che ne puoi trarre?
Certamente, di solito i giocatori bravi giocano "full stack", a meno che non sia un eccezione e giochi midstack strategy, per quello é piú probabile che chi non ha un stack pieno sia un giocatore occasionale. 🙂
haha I was that zipiKun, dont label me as a fish :x
Haha, I'm sorry 😄
do 2 tables. that would be better
Thanks for the feedback! 🙂
2 tables of zoom is better content, i think;
Thanks for the feedback Gary, will keep it in mind! 👍🙂
drinking vodka the whole video
Haha 😂
Does PS still have zoom?
Yes, keep in mind that this is the italian PokerStars though, because I'm from Italy. :)