NL10 Zoom PokerStars.it 🕵🏻 | Play & Explain #2 ☑️

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 сер 2024
  • Like, subscribe, and comment to support! 🎉💛🌞
    📺 Twitch. ➩ / positivepoker72
    📷 Instagram. ➩ / positivepoker72
    ▶️ Discord ➩ / discord
    #poker #onlinepoker #twitch #twitchpoker #microstakes
    #cashgame #cashgamepoker #pokerstars #pokerstarsitalia
    #onlinepoker #pokersession #playandexplain
    #positivepoker #staypositive
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 24

  • @mrocznymrowkojad4245
    @mrocznymrowkojad4245 2 роки тому +2

    love this video, waiting for more!

  • @fabiog4148
    @fabiog4148 2 роки тому +2

    Nice channel. I really enjoy your zoom sessions.

    • @PositivePoker72
      @PositivePoker72  2 роки тому +1

      Thanks for the nice comment, stay tuned for more! 👍🙂

  • @philiphardy8650
    @philiphardy8650 2 роки тому +2

    its all very basic down at Nl10 as you can see most players are simply playing there hands, Nico-Arge was the over aggro type and the guy who flatted AA and stacked him was the opposite, The over passive trappy type, You got some light calls as the dont want to fold a pair but even down there when they want to start piling money in they usually have the goods. I mentioned on the last one that stacking off with AK is not profitable at this level and i think you got Two or Three examples of this, Where even the more experianced players were flatting AK to 4 bets ( Noko-Arge being one). It was an interesting video though,
    Just got a message through, that you have gone live on Twitch, so will jump over there now.

    • @PositivePoker72
      @PositivePoker72  2 роки тому

      Yes, makes a lot of sense. Its definitely a whole different dynamic on NL10. 😅
      Thanks for the support again. 💛🙂

  • @ShegyRecords
    @ShegyRecords 2 роки тому +1

    Hi, great video, I love the 2 table format (I would maybe make tables a bit bigger and shrink webcam+session blocks).
    I am regular at NL10 with 11bb/100h with 30k sample size on different site. Would really appreciate if you could comment or drop an opinion on my claims from your session :) Thank you for sharing, I will watch next ones!
    1) KJo -> 6:00 squeeze 50% / fold 50%. Probably never calling.
    2) A3s -> 7:46 squeeze 70% / call 30%.
    3) JJ -> 11:30 ez fold on NL10 I would say. I usually stack with KK+ and sometimes queens (they always have KK+ when they do this, unless they are big fish).
    4) KJo -> 17:09 why not bet 1/3 pot on flop with almost all of your range ? Villain folds too much there, especially the "fun" player with short stack (If it's Loose Passive one). I would bet 2/3 or so with my value hands = exploit, fish calls with every gutshot or pair, weaker ace for example.
    5) AKs -> 21:20 I would probably bet really small like 1/3 or 1/4 on river to induce bluff + get calls from hands that would otherwise check behind with showdown value. Just to not loose value.
    6) AA -> 37:30 why check aces on draw heavy board, where fish + loose guy are involved in pot? You checked , but why not raise turn donkbet? Again lots of draws and fish always calls with any queen.
    7) QJo -> 38:50 why check flop? You have top pair, backdoor flush draw and playing vs fish that calls in SB. I think you have to protect vs K,A or straight cards and fish will call you with any J/T/draw.

    • @PositivePoker72
      @PositivePoker72  2 роки тому

      Thanks for the really constructive and deep feedback! :)
      Yeah, would be really nice to make the tables bigger, but I think I would need to resize them a bit, might look strange.. maybe gonna try! 😅
      Some decisions might be a bit biased, because I play with a HUD ingame, (as you can see from the winnings graph) but only with few hands obv., I don't show it because its a lot of number and really distracting. 😅
      1) I think it depends so much who you play against.. with no reads against regs 100% agree. Against a funplayer coldcalling a wide range in the CO, would never fold, squeezing might be an option, depends a lot on how many folds you can get preflop imo...
      2) Agree, if you expect to get enough folds again.
      3) Agree again. 🙂
      4) Makes sense, probably he was really aggro with the stats etc.
      5) Good point, really nice line to take there. Should be raising thin enough hopefully for value and we get value from sets, two pair etc.
      6) Really good point again, 100% agree in hindsight, makes no sense to try to play GTOish on NL10. Just gonna loose to much EV, taking the tricky line. 🙈
      7) Yes, as I said ingame its kind of close, I didn't know how loose his range actually was and thought we couldn't get 3 streets anyways, so why not check flop given that only an A and K is kind of scary for us., But again definitley betting flop for value is fine too and probably even better if we know he plays 32s there. (Might get 3 streets on a blank runout, against such a wide range)
      Definitely some questionable plays I made just for the sake of being a little bit balanced, which probably looses EV on NL10.
      Really good points, gg! 🙂

    • @ShegyRecords
      @ShegyRecords 2 роки тому +1

      @@PositivePoker72 Thank you for responding. To be fair, it's easier for me to point out some points when watching youtube video and chillin and having time to think about it :D I also make some plays, that I regret after session (when I review my hands).
      1) Good point. You most likely dominate his KT,K9,K8 or even his Jx. I just didn't realise it's fun player in CO. I just hate KJo personally, because it's one of the trickiest hands that get's me into troubles sometimes :D
      Again, I only play NL10, sometimes NL25 (but small sample, yet). My exploitative play will maybe suffer in higher stakes, where you have to be more balanced. Hopefully once I will move up the stakes like you. GG!

    • @PositivePoker72
      @PositivePoker72  2 роки тому

      @@ShegyRecords Yeah, really good points again and Im a big fan of pure exploitive play on lower stakes as well, def. highest EV. 🔥
      Thanks, gl for your journey, im sure youre gonna make it far with this attitude! 💪🏻🙂

    • @gesus.christ99
      @gesus.christ99 Рік тому

      an aggressive player would shove AK vs JJ but that's not a profitable call

  • @rotyrfed5156
    @rotyrfed5156 2 роки тому +1

    Like

  • @tigman685
    @tigman685 Рік тому +1

    Folding KQo from blinfs with MP raise preflop?

    • @PositivePoker72
      @PositivePoker72  Рік тому

      Yes, but borderline hand there. I use a simple HUD ingame, probably MP was a tight player in the small sample size I have... 😅 KQo will not make a lot of money in that spot, maybe perform breakevenish, but with rake might be even -EV. I have some some charts where it seems to be zero EV on higher stakes in that spot. If you play against a weak opponent, definitely not a fold. 😉

    • @tigman685
      @tigman685 Рік тому +1

      @@PositivePoker72 thanks for the answer, fixed potential leak. I usually have 3betted vs nits who fold a lot to 3bets, also 3 bet regs and other players who call 3bets a lot, sometimes calling vs loose players, but almost never fold 😅

    • @PositivePoker72
      @PositivePoker72  Рік тому

      @@tigman685 Haha, nice 😅
      Yeah, if you exploit tendencies, I think its fine anyways. Just important to be aware of why you do it. 🙂

  • @user-qw4fm9uk2c
    @user-qw4fm9uk2c 5 місяців тому +1

    Where did u get that graph?

    • @PositivePoker72
      @PositivePoker72  5 місяців тому

      This is Holdem Manager 3, I just cut out the Live Play Graph in a different window. 👍

  • @bmsfx
    @bmsfx 7 місяців тому +1

    Let me explain poker..
    LUCK..
    Thats it, period.

    • @PositivePoker72
      @PositivePoker72  7 місяців тому

      Short term a lot of it, long term not much. Depends how we define the tine frames though.. 😄

    • @bmsfx
      @bmsfx 7 місяців тому

      ​@@PositivePoker72 Reason i say this is because im unlucky, just does not matter what i do, i play the charts, everything..
      like example just yesterday, i have two pretty decent pairs from flop, and i loose to 4 jacks in the end, its the same every time.
      You cannot really "read" people online, i dont care what people say, specially at low bet tables, because people dont care about cents or a few dollars, so they play random as hell, there is no "risk" for them, maybe in some competitions its easier to weet out the randoms who just go all in on two 3's and stuff quickly.
      The few people you can read, I color people on how "dangerous" they are, easy folders/bluffers like green, people who only bet on good cards/never bluff in red, in between yellow/orange..
      I do everything as correctly as posible, yet im more or less 95% loose every hand (and those i win is low because when i get a decent card they get shit and folds).
      Also the bad cards for days in pokerstars confuses me, it feels like its not random, with real cards i get atleast some good cards some times, how can you get bad cards for days in row, what is the chance for that?, and even you get decent cards, someone always seem to get better on flop, so whats the point? i dont think poker is ment to play online at all.
      In the end, poker is just the same as pulling on a slot machine or tossing a coin with 6 sides.

  • @blairarcher8952
    @blairarcher8952 Рік тому +1

    Play like that maye on gg and you will get barreled all day .Cash is dead at micros .Its a bluff fest .A thousand UA-cam videos pointing players to bluff spots .Not random throw the money in players that used to be .

    • @PositivePoker72
      @PositivePoker72  Рік тому +1

      Honestly I have no clue about the GG pool, but I could definitely see that a lot of people improved on microstakes,
      because of free content. 😅
      I hope there still is room to be profitable,
      I would try to find some tendencies and exploit that if possible. Maybe some people barrel to much now and we xan calldown more.
      GL at the tables 👍🙂