Debunking the 5.3 theory or "Dad, have you reached the top yet?" theory. Spoiler: nah...

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 тра 2024
  • So many people are worried about the Crypto Crew University video:
    • WARNING: Bitcoin WON’T...
    or similar arguments given P. Brandt and others that I need to give an alternative point of view based on a more scientific argument. We are going through my Medium article here:
    / a-scientific-approach-...
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 26

  • @doctorstrange2549
    @doctorstrange2549 12 днів тому +1

    Fabulous work, Dr. G! Thank you for your continued tireless efforts! ❤💪🏻🍕

  • @McGeeRF
    @McGeeRF 11 днів тому +2

    Part of Steve's 5.3 theory includes this larger market cycle reset. Where after that 10 year reset he admits Bitcoin would obviously eventually go higher than his 85k presumed top this cycle.
    I'm currently reading a 90 to 95k next target. From current trend as of 5/11/2024.
    The problem with current TA read, there are alot of mixed signals outside of what appears to be an obvious 4th wave correction into a possible 5th wave to about 90k this year.
    The kicker is a 2M candle pattern which indicates a reversal trend, that he's pointing out.
    Other than that, there are other patterns which appear to require a play out to the downside before a final 5th wave, if it doesn't just completely invalidate the current upward trend all together.
    At which case, I still believe 58k is solid foundation for BTC that ought to hold, before it resolves the little bumps in the road for a Bullish continuation of the upward trend.
    That's what TA can tell.
    But for all my insights, there are mixed signals.

    • @quantonomy
      @quantonomy  9 днів тому

      It is all TA and therefore astrology.

    • @McGeeRF
      @McGeeRF 9 днів тому

      @quantonomy Surely, it's better than astrology.

  • @dogegamer3288
    @dogegamer3288 12 днів тому +2

    I'm grateful for Steve calling the top in the 70s. Cashed out. It's all downhill from here. Strange cycle (who would have that we would blowoff top before the halving).

    • @garethf5131
      @garethf5131 11 днів тому +1

      I agree, strange cycle, but obviously the ETF played a massive part in the price discrepancy at this stage of the cycle

  • @nick-oi1xf
    @nick-oi1xf 12 днів тому +1

    Grazie 😊

  • @Sniper95911
    @Sniper95911 11 днів тому +1

    Bitcoin power law vs 5.3 theory who will win

  • @mcalon2926
    @mcalon2926 12 днів тому +1

    Thanks for the insightful presentation. Q1. Do you think other crypto assets such as ETH also follow power-law? Q2. Do you think using BTC Market Cap instead of the price provides any new insight? Q3. Is the slope of the bottom trend (red line) the same as the "fair value" or "mid-line" slope? Thank you.

    • @quantonomy
      @quantonomy  12 днів тому

      No, they down ETH has a R^2 of 0.64 when fitted with a power that is not much better than noisy data.
      BTC cap is nothing else than coins x price and we have already almost all the coins in circulation. Plus the supply is a simple function of time so it is going to corrupt the price data. Price is better.

  • @DocumentingBTC
    @DocumentingBTC 11 днів тому

    perfect Dr , I hope there was a share button on youtube

  • @PhilCalfee
    @PhilCalfee 10 днів тому

    Can someone tell me at which point in the video that Steve’s 5.3 theory is referenced?

    • @quantonomy
      @quantonomy  9 днів тому

      Steve's 5.3 theory is the same theory as mentioned in the video.

    • @PhilCalfee
      @PhilCalfee 9 днів тому

      @@quantonomy can you tell me the timestamp? I could not find where in the video that the 5.3 theory is referenced

  • @ggtatz5889
    @ggtatz5889 11 днів тому

    I love your work but please invest in sound proofing and equipment. Or just turn your phone off 😂

  • @later4uluke876
    @later4uluke876 10 днів тому

    Excellent work Doc..as usual. But I have a confession..... while you absolutely deserve to have everyone listen to you and you get 1 gazillion followers, selfishly.... I hope only the few of us who believe and follow you, get it....at least for a few more years 😉

  • @Sniper95911
    @Sniper95911 11 днів тому

    I watch both channels I think Bitcoin power law will win

  • @RasmusHenkel
    @RasmusHenkel 11 днів тому +1

    I respect you and your work but you clearly dont understand Steve’s 5,3 theory. It doesnt violate the power law in any way. I hope you will make an updated video so i can hear your thoughts after you have understood the theory

    • @KK-sg5gl
      @KK-sg5gl 10 днів тому

      Doesn’t Steve suggest that we crash below 30k after that? Power Law says we’ll never go below 30k ever again.

    • @quantonomy
      @quantonomy  9 днів тому

      In which sense I don't understand the 5.3 claim? It is exactly how I explain it here. No more or less.

    • @RasmusHenkel
      @RasmusHenkel 9 днів тому

      @@quantonomy it doesnt violate the power law

    • @quantonomy
      @quantonomy  9 днів тому

      @@RasmusHenkel Listen to the video. It is not a matter of violation. It is a matter of not separating what is due to the general power law trend and what is due to the decay of the bubbles. The only reasonable way to understand the bubbles is as deviations from the trend.
      Steve we don't reach 100 K in this cycle. We reach 100 K in April 2025 as general trend and we should be higher because the bull market will start in December. His idea is wrong.

  • @TravisFont
    @TravisFont 9 днів тому

    Dude, get a proper mic if you are gonna talk science technicals for 85 minutes straight.

    • @quantonomy
      @quantonomy  9 днів тому

      The mic is good, I just need to put it closer to me. I tried that in the most recent video and audio improved a lot. Next is sound proofing the room. It is noisy because it is close to the road.

  • @tarsem3258
    @tarsem3258 11 днів тому +2

    Get a better mic

    • @quantonomy
      @quantonomy  9 днів тому +1

      True. Also I need to put it closer I think.