Ian McEwan: Brexit, Mistakes in Literature, Moral Decision-Making | Full Video | The Origins Podcast

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 сер 2024
  • Please consider unlocking exclusive benefits by supporting our podcast at / originspodcast
    Ian McEwan sits down with Lawrence Krauss to discuss everything from Brexit, revolutions of social behavior, to mistakes in literature, and a new era of moral decision-making.
    Ian McEwan is a British novelist, screenwriter, and political activist. He is the author of 16 novels, 5 screenplays, 2 plays, and many short stories.
    McEwan is a Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature, the Royal Society of Arts, and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
    An avowed atheist, he has spoken out regularly against Islamism for its views on women and homosexuality. He is also a staunch supporter of Humanist causes and in 2011 he was awarded the Jerusalem Prize for the Freedom of the Individual in Society. He is a strong opponent of Brexit.
    McEwan has been nominated for the Man Booker Prize six times, winning the prize in 1998 for his novel Amsterdam. His book Saturday won the James Tait Black Memorial Prize in 2005. He has also been the recipient of many other awards including the 1999 Shakespeare Prize by the Alfred Toepher Foundation in Hamburg and the 2019 Golden Plate Award from the American Academy of Achievement. He was awarded the CBE in 2000.
    11 of his stories have been adapted into films, including his novel Atonement which was nominated for 7 Academy Awards, winning one.
    The Times featured him on its list of “The 50 greatest British writers since 1945” and The Daily Telegraph ranked him number 19 in its list of the “100 most powerful people in British Culture”.
    www.ianmcewan.com/
    Twitter: / theoriginspod
    Instagram: / theoriginspod
    Facebook: / theoriginspod
    iTunes: podcasts.apple...
    Website: TheOriginsPodc...
    The Origins Podcast, a production of The Origins Project Foundation, features in-depth conversations with some of the most interesting people in the world about the issues that impact all of us in the 21st century. Host, theoretical physicist, lecturer, and author, Lawrence M. Krauss, will be joined by guests from a wide range of fields, including science, the arts, and journalism. The topics discussed on The Origins Podcast reflect the full range of the human experience - exploring science and culture in a way that seeks to entertain, educate, and inspire.
    Thank you for your support!

КОМЕНТАРІ • 114

  • @d.mavridopoulos66
    @d.mavridopoulos66 3 роки тому +25

    The best talk I have ever attended, was given by Ian McEwan in Athens, Greece in 2018. He was enthrallingly articulate, on several subjects, for 1,5 hours non-stop. I've never envied another person's intellect so much, as when he was holding forth on every topic under the sun, in mellifluous sentences.

    • @paulscottfilms
      @paulscottfilms 2 роки тому

      sure he holds forth ln everything he's a bloody elite left-wing precious transhuman specimen.

    • @lidiaadobato7822
      @lidiaadobato7822 2 роки тому

      Mellifluous: smooth and gentle flow. Very pleasant to listen to
      We don' t have the word in Spanish or rather, never used in this positive sense

  • @joanr3189
    @joanr3189 2 роки тому +5

    I stumbled into this engrossing conversation. My mission now is to read all of Ian McEwan’s works. Such an interesting man.

  • @samboulton7722
    @samboulton7722 3 роки тому +13

    Great interview Lawrence. One of my favourites! Please keep them coming.

  • @dtabb39268
    @dtabb39268 3 роки тому +10

    Glad to see you back again.

  •  Рік тому +1

    Thank you Lawrence and Ian for this wonderful conversation.

  • @CaroleMora22
    @CaroleMora22 11 місяців тому

    Ian McEwan personifies excellence in critical thinking, creativity, and an eros-driven, extremely generous kind of human emotional intelligence and sensibility -- thank you! This talk also reminded me of E.O. Wilson's book Consilience, a gem of a book carrying related, provocative, and inspiring ideas.

  • @andrewpickering5180
    @andrewpickering5180 3 роки тому +5

    Thank you for all your work.

  • @BooksForever
    @BooksForever 6 місяців тому

    Always a treat to see Hitch’s various friends carrying on with chats together.

  • @philipjohn9566
    @philipjohn9566 2 роки тому +1

    What a rich conversation. Thank you so much.

  • @OscarWrightZenTANGO
    @OscarWrightZenTANGO 3 роки тому +7

    Fascinating interview

  • @monicaangelini3324
    @monicaangelini3324 2 роки тому +3

    Yes!!! Re-reading is amazing!

  • @doyle6000
    @doyle6000 2 роки тому +3

    Amazing interview, thank you.

  • @bijofrancis1114
    @bijofrancis1114 2 роки тому +2

    A good episode. I would love to watch and listen to Nobel laureate Kazuo Ishiguro in this podcast.

  • @Souljahna
    @Souljahna 2 роки тому +1

    Wonderful interview. Thank you!

  • @GNARGNARHEAD
    @GNARGNARHEAD 3 роки тому +4

    I really like the idea that consciousness doesn't exist, in the sense that it's a concept that represents a hugely dynamic set interactions that is just computationally unreasonable for us to deal with.. outside of borderline metaphysical vagaries

    • @plumjam
      @plumjam 2 роки тому +1

      If consciousness doesn't exist, what is it that likes the idea that consciousness doesn't exist?

  • @paulblease6029
    @paulblease6029 3 роки тому +4

    How enlightening!

  • @leonardniamh
    @leonardniamh Рік тому

    This beautiful discussion reminds me of the movie Departures

  • @petedawson4331
    @petedawson4331 3 роки тому +4

    Krauss rocks the party.

  • @codrinvechiu2832
    @codrinvechiu2832 Рік тому

    Brilliant.

  • @Hollis_has_questions
    @Hollis_has_questions 2 роки тому +1

    Science = organized curiosity. Nice.

  • @leonardniamh
    @leonardniamh Рік тому

    Diving into their minds is just wonderful & a lifetime

  • @dickwagenaar3684
    @dickwagenaar3684 3 роки тому +7

    Wonderful--I am so thankful for intelligent conversations these days. Thanks Lawrence. Keep it up.

  • @rossconi
    @rossconi 3 роки тому +8

    well this is an unexpected delight.

  • @laurasalo6160
    @laurasalo6160 2 роки тому +1

    @53:00
    Krauss points out one reason why super intelligent creatures dont come to Earth to visit us.
    To paraphrase his answer:
    We're not exactly hunting down our microwaves from 1997 to see how they're doing either...😆🙃

    • @Hollis_has_questions
      @Hollis_has_questions 2 роки тому

      If I were them, I wouldn’t visit us. Why would I? Observation from afar is enough of a reason to stay away.

  • @mykolatalankin7364
    @mykolatalankin7364 3 роки тому +2

    Hi Kraus!

  • @mrav8r
    @mrav8r 2 роки тому +1

    Lawrence, your questions were insightful, however I was wishing that you would step back and let Ian speak more words.

  • @talbrott
    @talbrott 2 роки тому

    thanks

  • @leonardoiglesias2394
    @leonardoiglesias2394 Рік тому

    The hunger by Martin Caparros.

  • @TheGatesOfFire
    @TheGatesOfFire 3 роки тому +2

    How many adverts?

    • @doyle6000
      @doyle6000 2 роки тому

      i only had two UA-cam adverts

  • @yamishogun6501
    @yamishogun6501 2 роки тому

    32:00 on rereading books you read decades ago

  • @1patula
    @1patula 3 роки тому +3

    Wonderful conversation, thank you

  • @defenderofwisdom
    @defenderofwisdom 3 роки тому

    I realize the morally cathartic (if less than emotionally cathartic) conclusion to the plot mentioned with lying about rape to make jail time for a true rapist who cannot be tried would be for the man to lie to the court and confess to a rape which did not happen, and for the woman he falsely claims to have raped to admit it did not happen and for *him* to go to jail for lying to the court. Assuming the only reason his true confession wouldn't bring jail time is because too much time passed from the crime since his confession is the faster solution.

  • @46metube
    @46metube 3 роки тому +4

    "we delude ourselves so efficiently.." that will do when it comes to human consciousness. how efficient our delusions are. poetry, psychology and science, all in one. humans are doomed, so we better get on with the serious business of dreaming.

  • @janetginger8571
    @janetginger8571 3 роки тому +1

    The book, "Anurag Sager Of Kabir" COULD INTEREST YOU.

  • @FannyAnzai
    @FannyAnzai 3 роки тому +3

    First?! Hello, is this live or just premiered?!

  • @lidiaadobato7822
    @lidiaadobato7822 2 роки тому

    Im watching from Argentina and there are so many adverts. If announcers understood how one can hate the product advertised and swear to never ever buy it.

  • @sircharlesnot
    @sircharlesnot 3 роки тому +3

    Brexit - is independence that's for what

    • @tefilobraga
      @tefilobraga 3 роки тому +2

      And is independence supposed to be intrinsically good? Or is it just a religious and tribal irrational value?

    • @sircharlesnot
      @sircharlesnot 3 роки тому +4

      @@tefilobraga it's the only true good. Liberty is the founding principle of all democratic countries!!!

  • @doyle6000
    @doyle6000 2 роки тому

    Thinking, Fast and Slow - Daniel Kahneman
    Is this the book Ian McEwan mentions??

  • @Larkinchance
    @Larkinchance 2 роки тому +1

    We are unwittingly constructing the Matrix

  • @defenderofwisdom
    @defenderofwisdom 3 роки тому +1

    You know, this discussion made.me rethink the "smallness" scale.of civilization success. At first I thought ranking a civilization by mastery of the small was futile. Surely that would just be a component, where a species would expand just with tinier and tinier circuits. Nor are small aliens a new concept, I remember the old Animorph books I read had a species of small invaders, and since the author borrowed from the Invasion of the Body Snatchers for the primary plot I assume she borrowed that too. Then Accelerando argued if an AI-human pre-singularity shot a sophisticated set of AI agents to visit a brown dwarf on the edge of the solar system and came back, the advancement at the singularity would be so great by comparison to the coke-can-computer to render the journey meaningless. Here, we see something similar... Why put ten million humans on this station, two billion on this planet, when we could fit sixty trillion on earth by making people smaller. But I think the value in expansion is still in redundancy - the more planets, the more collisions and other solar system phenomena required to end life. Hell, the more stars it becomes even more resilient.

  • @johnhanks4260
    @johnhanks4260 2 роки тому

    Chaos theory Consciousness.

  • @johnmorgan5495
    @johnmorgan5495 3 роки тому

    Hey, maybe the octopus' are the intelligent aliens.

    • @jorgegomez524
      @jorgegomez524 3 роки тому

      if they end up in my plate, they aren’t that intelligent. First sign of intelligence is becoming the apex predator.

  • @2msvalkyrie529
    @2msvalkyrie529 2 роки тому +1

    Listen to the archetypal petit bourgeois rant about
    Brexit and lost trade deals at the end . Can anyone
    seriously imagine Proust / Mann / Tolstoy or any other
    truly great novelist chuntering on about lost trade
    deals ?!?!..... Sums McEwen up perfectly.

  • @mgthaking
    @mgthaking 3 роки тому +1

    Hello my 👽s

  • @PerryTribeMetalBaker
    @PerryTribeMetalBaker 3 роки тому +1

    Dinner Time!!

  • @escapefelicity2913
    @escapefelicity2913 2 роки тому +1

    Lawrence, quit interrupting

  • @raewrite1081
    @raewrite1081 2 роки тому

    P is

  • @SThrillz
    @SThrillz 3 роки тому

    God created man so he can experience what he jacked, mortality and ignorance.

  • @gordonlinton3555
    @gordonlinton3555 3 роки тому +3

    Great interview, although it's clear that Ian hasn't had a serious debate about Brexit to help him understand the real issues.

    • @davidleibel
      @davidleibel 2 роки тому

      You provide not a single argument in support of your statement, Mr Linton. Because there is none. As McEwan says Brexit has become a religious belief unsupported by evidence.

    • @gordonlinton3555
      @gordonlinton3555 2 роки тому +4

      @@davidleibel I assume projecting Brexit as some kind of religious belief makes you feel comfortable inside lol... It's not a good look to the outside world.

  • @kurtklingbeil6900
    @kurtklingbeil6900 3 роки тому +2

    Krause sure likes to hear himself talk...
    He's got a guest but spends more time pontificating his own views rather than listening

    • @oldskeptic1513
      @oldskeptic1513 3 роки тому

      ... if you've got it, flaunt it... some need to be pontificating to...

    • @monicaangelini3324
      @monicaangelini3324 2 роки тому +1

      It is not an interview it is a talk

    • @doyle6000
      @doyle6000 2 роки тому

      @@monicaangelini3324 exactly

  • @geoffreynhill2833
    @geoffreynhill2833 3 роки тому

    AI = BLX

  • @ian7666
    @ian7666 2 роки тому +1

    As much as I admire him as a writer, it’s clearly easy to boggle his mind, and in stating that no-one is making an economic argument for Brexit he’s clearly very short sighted on the costs of uncontrolled immigration that the EU refused to budge on, forcing us to leave. A “folly” according to the multi-millionaire whose living standards haven’t been impacted by 40 years of real wage deflation

    • @urbansoundscapes7734
      @urbansoundscapes7734 2 роки тому +6

      Please don't forget that it has been UK government policy to encourage immigration (to help the economy) over many decades, not the EU forcing uncontrolled immigration upon us. Pressure for the UK to leave the EU came predominantly from the very wealthy (many overseas) who funded the Brexit campaign. Brexit was driven and motivated by money, power and the retention of control of British tax havens for the wealth of the few. For the vast majority Brexit is bringing a lower quality of life; lower regulatory standards, fewer opportunities to study, work and live our lives where we want, negatively impacting the economy and with it public services and infrastructure - not to mention the undermining of established security alliances. In my view his mind is anything but boggled!

    • @daviddavids2884
      @daviddavids2884 2 роки тому +1

      your uninvited and under-informed OPINION is noted.

    • @ian7666
      @ian7666 2 роки тому

      @@daviddavids2884 If you say so, snowflake 🤷‍♂️

  • @jcarlosperezgmail
    @jcarlosperezgmail 3 роки тому +1

    Fastest way to lose respect for an intellectual with their arrogance towards the majority of people when they don't like their decisions.

    • @johnlee5423
      @johnlee5423 3 роки тому +2

      And why should he LIKE the majorities decision

    • @doyle6000
      @doyle6000 2 роки тому

      @@johnlee5423 he should at least respect it

    • @johnlee5423
      @johnlee5423 2 роки тому +2

      @@doyle6000 why

    • @doyle6000
      @doyle6000 2 роки тому

      @@johnlee5423 because it's a democracy - majority rules!

    • @johnlee5423
      @johnlee5423 2 роки тому

      @@doyle6000 stupidity of the majority does not have to be respected

  • @DouwedeJong
    @DouwedeJong 3 роки тому +1

    Lawrence feels forced, something is wrong. - Perhaps the fact that Ian doesn't think science is anything more special than organized curiously.

    • @drts6955
      @drts6955 3 роки тому

      it gets better

  • @escapefelicity2913
    @escapefelicity2913 2 роки тому

    Get rid of the background noise

  • @joesheridan2558
    @joesheridan2558 3 роки тому

    again with loaded questions pushing right wing narrative that krauss buys into.did it with woody allen also.

  • @Gringohuevon
    @Gringohuevon 3 роки тому +2

    boring self-indulgent nonsense

  • @universeatpeace3202
    @universeatpeace3202 3 роки тому +4

    what an amazing interview. so true...thank you