Online Young Earth Creationists VS Their Guests
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 лют 2022
- It's rough out there for YECs.
Music:
Intro: The Mind Electric by Miracle Musical
www.hawaiipartii.com/
Outro: Point Pleasant by Brock Berrigan
www.brockberrigan.com/
Sources:
Hite R. J. and Anders D. E., 1991, Chapter 4 Petroleum and Evaporites, Editor(s): Judith L. Melvin, Developments in Sedimentology, Elsevier, Volume 50, Pages 349-411, ISSN 0070-4571, ISBN 9780444886804
Kirkland, D.W., R.E. Denison, and W.E. Dean. 2000. “Parent Brine of the Castile Evaporites (Upper Permian), Texas and New Mexico”, Journal of Sedimentary Research, v. 70, n. 3, pp. 749-761.
North, F.K. 1985. Petroleum Geology, Unwin Hyman, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 631pp.
Reinfort, E.M. 2020. Naturalism Versus Flood Geology: Comparing the Best Responses from Two Sides: Volume 4: Some Massive Salt Deposits and their Possible Origins, Digital Services, Kindle Edition, www.amazon.com/Naturalism-Ver...
Whitmore, J.H. 2006a. The Green River Formation: A Large Post-Flood Lake System, Journal of Creation, v. 20, n. 1, pp. 55-63.
Whitmore, J.H. 2006b. The Geologic Setting of the Green River Formation, Journal of Creation, v. 20, n. 1, pp. 72-78.
Whitmore, J.H. 2006c. Difficulties with a Flood Model for the Green River Formation, Journal of Creation, v. 20, n. 1, pp. 81-85. - Наука та технологія
Sure, all that water would protect the Ark. The same way a pot of water will protect a lobster from the fire of the stove.
Well, you have to admit, all pathological bacteria, viruses and parasites would be very effectively killed! 😂🤣
Aha! Gutsick Gibbon admits to being a giant moth irresistibly drawn to the Bonfire of the Inanities!
Therefore it proves we did not evolve from apes! We evolved from insects!
@@JackgarPrime I think she said she's an ape, this just means that moths and apes are of the same kind. This makes more sense! There was no need to bring millions of insects on the ark if they mini-evolved from the ark ape.
😂
I like that.
And I am a moth drawn to her.
“And of course domestic abusers” made me literally laugh out loud. Also I would like to take this opportunity to remind everyone that in one of Hovind’s seminars he uses “Have you stopped beating your wife?” as an example of a question that assumes a conclusion and I think we should use that on him every opportunity we get.
Does your mom know youre gay
"Have you stopped beating your wife?" "Have you?"
Leave Kent alone God commanded him to strike her down with the power of the lord aka just a right hook
These videos are like going to a spa and getting a common sense massage 😊
I'm pretty sure the hypercane model is just incomplete. Obviously those were, in fact, sharknados. Sharks are great heat conductors and can therefore carry much more heat into space.
😂❤️
If sharknados existed, that means aliens exist. If aliens exist, that means the Illuminati exists.
ILLUMINATI CONFIRMED.
Love your show even though sometimes it's too much information for my brain to absorb , it's like talking to my daughter during lunch together.
@@iloveplasticbottles Yes, and it also means that Cyberdyne is real, and the Terminators are on their way to kill Sarah Conner. We must stop them before it's too late.
Came here to say this very thing. Few people truly understand how vital a role sharks play in flood geology. It's like one of those abstract/hidden image pics - once you see it, it seems so obvious.
Hi Ms. Gibbon, I'm here because your video was in my recommended feed. And as a Christian with a formal education, everything you said in the first ten minutes makes feel agonizing embarrassment to even admit to my beliefs. Because I'll get lumped in with these lunatic YECs...
But hearing the excuses they make to justify their belief that the Earth is 6,000 years old, I just... It's torture, but torturing myself is why I'm here, so I'mma see how much I can endure before I opt out and return at a later time. If I don't reach a stopping point in the novel I'm writing first.
I hope that you have a strong social system where you can be open about yourself. I remember the rock and the hard place of being a scientifically literate religious person and hope you know you're not alone
As long as you aren't a yec and believe in evolution, you should be fine. I am a Catholic and love gutsick.
Minor correction at 10:18: I'm a nuclear engineer, not a nuclear physicist. I know just enough physics to dunk on Creationists.
That is not much, I think my cat knows enough physics to dunk a Creationist.
@@davebrown6552 cats are our evil overlords. So... That's not at all surprising.
@@JosephKano ALL HAIL FLUFFY!
@Eminent Domain and on day seven it needed a rest, so it rested, what did god do on day 8 that it did not do on day 7? how about day 9?
At the very most (if a god exists) it is a god doing what a god can do without effort or leaning what do you think makes it worthy of your worship?
If god appeared to me how would I recognize it?
if I told you I had seen a vision of god would you believe me would you follow god's instructions without question how would you know god had actually communicated with me and that I was not delusional or just lying. what questions would you ask what answers would satisfy you that I was a genuine prophet.
(from an atheist point of view all claims of prophesy are either delusion or lies I have no mechanism to conclude anything else. How do you distinguish the real from the imaginary?)
You claim you answered some unlisted questions with unlisted answers am I supposed to be impressed? I build a really big sand castle!! Are you impressed? Do you feel the need to worship me!!
@Eminent Domain bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha
Aside from thermodynamics, nuclear physics, astronomy, meteorology, geology, biology, & paleontology the YECs pretty have it nailed down!
Don't forget archeology, linguistics, geography, and other squishier sciences!
lol indeed. Hey i loved your calculations regarding the heat problem. It's fun to see that you can be absolutely as generous as possible with the parameters and still come out with a catastrophic level of heat.
Aha! But Matt Powell knows everything about everything!
@ReasontoDoubt - May i add botany and paleobotany?
My simple question for the PHD's who drop out of their field and go into YEC, I'd like to see their bank accounts before and after they swapped
Good idea, the Cayman Islands are nice this time of year.
While I'm sure they're paid better _pretending to work_ as YECs rather than working as scientists, I imagine the greater appeal would be not having to fight for funding and the significantly lighter workload of jack shit, fuck all, and diddly squat, as compared to doing research and measuring and documenting and calculating and using their brain for something other than heat dissipation.
It's a wonder anyone goes into science at all, but I guess not everyone is a shameless parasite. I mean, we couldn't be; we'd all be dead if we were all religiously-motivated ideologues.
@@EdwardHowtonWell said. And let's not forget sex. Scratch the outer dermal layer of these holier-than-thou types and you always discover a horndog, usually with a little kink on the side.
I seriously can't believe it took me this long to find your channel. Your channel would have helped fast track my deconversion by a significant margin. I didn't even know what to look for when I started looking into the actual science because my school only taught creationist science.
Welcome to the world of the sane.
Reality is warm and the dark is full of terror ……. It is known
@@blaster-zy7xx really look at Europe right now and tell me how sane non believers are. By the way Hitler was not a Christian he was a supremacist that usef anything and everything to gain control and have tbe German people go along with him. Stahling another atheist that displayed sanity by killing 60 million of his own people there is nothing wrong with that if God doesn't exist.
@@ronniebuchanan6575 Morals can exist without a god. Morals SHOULD exist without having to be enforced through fear of a divine entity. Anyone can tell you that Stalin and Hitler were terrible people who did terrible things, with or without them being involved with religion. You may believe that you should not go against your morals because 'God' has taught you not to, and that is perfectly fine. Atheists believe that they shouldn't go against their morals because they don't want to hurt people, because they want to be proud of themselves, because they help. The list goes on, and many apply to both religious people and atheists.
In 'Europe right now', or anywhere in the world, there are idiots of every kind. It is unlikely that it would change anything if everyone in 'Europe right now' was Christian.
Sidenotes: Hitler was not necessarily a Christian, but he wasn't necessarily an atheist. I can't find any definitive evidence either way, and you can't exactly ask the man himself. Vladimir Putin is a Christian.
Would you kill 60 million people if you didn't believe in a god? That says more about you than atheists.
I do love it when you are charitable to the point of absurdity towards these claims and they still fall apart at the slightest breeze.
Put another way, I love seeing liars called out for their BS.
Too bad you have zero evidence whatsoever to prove your fairy tale religion evolutionism. Apes don't turn human, Whales never walked on land, and fish don't grow feet. Oops.
Call me a liar? Back it up. Bring anything you think you have to prove your fairytale and get destroyed right here chumppp.
The Y chromosome in the Chimpanzee is radically different from that of a human. For starters, it's half the size, and only 70% of the human version.
Humans and chimps share 80%, if that. 98% is a myth based on assumptions, and sampling 5 times over.
Humans and cabbage share 50% DNA commonality, for reference.
@@shootingstarzz6161 "Apes don't turn into humans. Whales never walked on land and fish don't grow feet." Good thing no evolutionary biologist has ever claimed such absurdities. For the first point, the common ancestor for apes and humans split at some point in the past. Due to environmental pressures and random mutation, the descendants of that ancestor slowly, over thousands of years, developed into australopithecines, and some of their descendants slowly, over thousands of years, developed into the genus Homo, some of which further evolved into humans.
The length of the time periods evolution requires for change, the extremely slow and gradual change, and the fact that only a tiny fraction of all organisms are fossilized, makes evolution seem counter-intuitive in some way. I understand. But it is more likely than Young Earth Creationism (or even Christianity) because the claims it has made do get borne out when they are tested.
@@bludfyre
Common ancestor between apes and Humans? Where? I don't see apes giving birth to half br33eds, do you?
"Problems with Lucy and Skull 1470
David A. Plaisted":
"Dr. Charles Oxnard completed the most sophisticated computer analysis of australopithecine fossils ever undertaken, and concluded that the australopithecines have nothing to do with the ancestry of man whatsoever, and are simply an extinct form of ape (Fossils, Teeth and Sex: New Perspectives on Human Evolution, University of Washington Press, 1987)."
@@shootingstarzz6161 "Common ancestor between apes and Humans? Where? I don't see apes giving birth to half br33eds, do you?"
I cannot pinpoint which species was the common ancestor, because I am a) not an evolutionary biologist, and b) the fossil record is not complete due to time and the fact that the organisms that do become fossilized are a tiny fraction of those that existed. As far as apes giving birth to "half-breeds," that ignores the fact that each change, mutation, and adaptation takes thousands of years. It is not like two apes mated, and gave birth to a homo erectus. It is more like two apes mated, gave birth to an offspring with a small change in its DNA, which passed that change to its offspring, and then 10 generations later another change was introduced.
@@bludfyre
Translation -->
You have jack sh1tt to prove your fairytale. Oops.
The Y chromosome in the Chimpanzee is radically different from that of a human. For starters, it's half the size, and only 70% of the human version.
Humans and chimps share 80%, if that. 98% is a myth based on assumptions, and sampling 5 times over.
Humans and cabbage share 50% DNA commonality, for reference.
LOL, the memes, artwork, and clear and concise breakdown of the topic are awesome.
@Eminent Domain bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha
Great stuff, I continue to be impressed by the depth of your knowledge.
New subscriber and huge fan of your work. I love the multi-faceted approach you have to taking down YEC nonsense and the way you really engage with their 'research'. Too often people who are not brave enough to dive fully into this cesspit of academic dishonesty are taken by surprise by the more outlandish arguments YECs put forward, but you always seem at the cutting edge of whatever deranged fictions they dream up.
Absolutely fantastic breakdown. :) As always, very grateful for your work.
This is one of your best videos. Very succinct well researched and put together. 👍
A MUST WATCH peeps!
Ditto! Plus, I must mention that you are fun to watch 😄
World-class snark!
@@I_am_Irisarc me??? Oh shucks ☺️ thanks mate
Oh my, you did a 'debate' with nephilim free. A: I'll try and watch that but that guy is so so hard to take
And B: so... You're a masochist huh? Why would you do that to yourself!
@@JosephKano I wouldn’t call it a “debate”. It ended up as me talking to myself for 30 mins. I did one with Otangelo that went the distance
ua-cam.com/video/kaIia4xGw9o/v-deo.html
Honestly I don’t debate to defend any viewpoint. Just to mock YECs and primarily Hovind.
For me the killer issue is that any hypothesis meant to overturn consensus needs to explain observations at least as well as, and preferably better than, the existing consensus. Young Earth creationism simply never meets that standard.
And proponents of the hypothesis can't even point to any kind of systemic problem in the associated fields that even requires an alternate hypothesis. Every supposed problem they point out is always well understood through significant observation and experimentation to not even be a problem. Meanwhile, every supposed solution they propose turns up new problems at every angle you approach it from, and most of their time is spent feebly plugging the gaps with yet more explanations that have yet more problems. This is simply the opposite of what we would expect to find with a stronger hypothesis meant to overturn the consensus.
Indeed, the young Earth creationist position is so fundamentally flawed in so many ways any reputable scientist could reject it on that basis alone even in the absence of a competing consensus or even untested hypothesis. If no alternate explanation existed we would still be on better scientific footing than with YEC.
The "fundamental problem" with the conventional science is that it challenges YEC's narrow worldview.
The "fundamental issue" with creationist science is that it's not science :D
@@cy-one correct. It's theology. They can teach it in schools. In theology classes where it belongs.
@@JosephKano I'd personally love it if those classes would just be renamed to "Mythologies" and also teach stuff about the Greek, Norse and Hindu pantheons, about the American deities, about the Aborigines' creation mythos, etc.pp. alongside Christianity and Islam.
@@cy-one sure, but to convince anyone else we need to be able to articulate why it isn't science. Unsupported assertions is what they do.
This lady with strange hair from the beginning of the video introduced me to the world of young earth creationists last summer… I am from Russia and here I have never seen people that are young earth creationists. There probably are but I have never seen them. Last summer I was chatting with a guy who is originally from Russia but lives in the US. I noticed him mentioning that he doesn’t believe we are apes. I was shocked and asked to explain. And he sent me this video (for some reason lol, don’t know why it was about the flood). And that was the day when I added to my mind one more crazy thing people believe in. I was speechless, I couldn’t understand why this nice guy who is pretty reasonable in other aspects would believe this nonsense. I try not to remember this fact about him when I talk to him lol. But there is one good thing about that day. After that video youtube started to recommend me firstly videos of AronRa and then your videos. So I am glad I was introduced to you guys … even through this weird belief
same here, my mom doesn’t believe we are apes too. I found AronRa as well when I started to leave the world of supernatural horseshit. Hey ever think of the adam and eve story evey incest like
@@eddierice3254 Not to mention that Eve is just made from Adam’s rib, so that makes it a male: male relationship. 😜
“The heat is a feature, not a bug. We need heat to make the plates not quite liquid, but malleable.”
I’m pretty sure rock that’s hot enough to be “not quite liquid but still malleable,” is still called lava. Is he saying the entire planet was a volcanic hellscape? I’ll admit I’m not a geologist and could very well be wrong on this, but I have been to areas with high volcanic activity and feel like it’d be pretty noticeable if the entire planet was lava only a few thousand years ago.
@Eminent Domain bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha
@Eminent Domain I genuinely can’t tell if you’re serious or if this is a satirical copypasta. I’m leaning towards satire because it’s hard to imagine someone bragging about their lack of knowledge on a science channel and in such an absurd way, but I wouldn’t be surprised if you were genuinely this full of yourself.
@Eminent Domain cringe.
@Eminent Domain If god is so big, why won't he fight me?
What I find frustrating as a professional scholar, but also a hobbyist within STEM, is that most of this information is not highly technical or just within the realm of experts, whatever that means. To understand radiometric dating at a good-enough level requires just a quiet afternoon and a well written textbook. This is not beyond anyone with some time and some basic chemistry knowledge. As a multidisciplinary scholar, I have been required time and again to understand the basic debates and groundwork within a particular field before providing my own arguments and papers. Part of my training was in Archaeology, and the various multifaceted methods used within the field. Thus what I find interesting about the problem of YEC is that what it gets wrong is elementary; most of their ideas and arguments can be disproven by educated children. And this leads me to my final thought, if YEC can and do fool so many about science, which is rather basic in the grand scheme of things, then what does this say about America's (because it is a predominantly an American issue) education system? Warm regards and thank you for the video, L.
The issue you bring up about the US is a huge problem, but it goes deeper than that. We have right wing "news" channels that place scientific ignorance on a pediatal while excoriating actual experts. Look how we elected Donald Trump as our president, and accused Dr Fouci of corruption as we moved into a world pandemic. We have almost half the country beleiving that vaccines are a way for the left to "take our freedoms." We literally have people dying by the tens of thousands because of profound ignorance and hubris. I see it every day.
So I know this comment is kinda old at this point, just thought I'd put in my two cents from someone who escaped the "teachings" of a YEC background.
While I completely agree with all of your points, there is one thing I'd like to point out, that a lot of people who have never been on the inside will understand: while yes these types of pseudo-science do often tend to attract people who either purposefully don't bother or are unable to critically think about the implications of what the cult is peddling, there are also people like myself, who was completely raised within the system and led to believe in no uncertain terms that the "scientists/evolutionists" were purposefully stretching the truth at least and at most completely lying about the facts and data. This was of course all while I was being told to make sure that I critically question everything I am told (probably trying to keep me from studying the science myself), and I am being told this by people who, while maybe not directly complicit in purposefully deceiving people, at the very least the people at the top who everyone gets their info from, is.
Speaking of that, when you are constantly being told that group A is untrustworthy, and group B (essentially) cannot be wrong cuz God is on their side (to clarify: since they are teaching about what the TRUTH of the Bible says, and since the bible is infallible, if they are telling the bible's side of things, they are right, and anyone who says otherwise is dishonest).
Sorry for rambling, but TL;DR: not everyone who believes this stuff does so out of intentional ignorance, and if shown the actual arguments and data that is out there, would at least question some things. Don't overlook the power of propaganda and misinformation/information concealment.
Cheers btw, didn't mean to highjack your comment, and as I said earlier, I agree with all your points. just the end of your comment "inspired me" lol
@@azure_antlers You make a good point. When one is inside a cave, it is difficult to know what lies beyond the shadows on the walls.
Young Lady, we need to have words. Those words are, "This maybe the best thing that I've ever seen, and I've seen two mules fightin' over a turnip." Pleeeeeez keep it up. BTW I hadn't thought about the heat problem. That is a YEC killer, but of course, Jesus himself could stand at a blackboard and point out the stupidity of their ideas and they would just post a bunch of insulting YT responses (body-shaming on account of the stigmata? making fun of him because his dad was never around?) *I should be ashamed of myself*
Nah, they'd point out he was a hippie advocating for the 'rich' to give it all away to charity as:
Jesus answered, “If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.” When the young man heard this, he went away sad, because he had great wealth. Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.” -Matthew 19:21-24
@@BSpinoza210 That tale must be real hell for the "Prosperity Preachers" as they fly around in their personal jets. I would love to raise the quote with them and watch as they turn their belief system inside out to justify their scams.
@@John.0z Ah, see they got around that by rewriting the Bible to only include the parts they like, creating a kind of prosperity gospel'.
@@BSpinoza210 I am not all that surprised, and maybe should have expected something like that. They really are scraping the bottom of the barrel of humanity. Or is that inhumanity?
Fantastic video. I have used the Green River Formation many times as my argument but was unaware of the Castille Formation. As a varve it has a much shorter history, only hundreds of thousands of years opposed to millions. But it has got to be pretty tricky to dry out the Earth many thousand times to make what amounts to salt deposits in the middle of a worldwide flood.
One of my favorites has been to use the embedded meanders of Goosenecks State Park. It is a tributary to the Colorado so its geologic history is going to largely mirror that of the Grand Canyon. The embedded meanders of Gooseneck State Park show that the rock was extremely well indurated before it was eroded. And a flood simply will not make that sort of erosion pattern. It would cause sheet flow. Not meanders. Increase the volume of water to the necessary levels to erode that formation that quickly and it would overflow and go into sheet flow.
Your smart. (Not sarcasm)
YECs: "The laws of the universe are fine tuned for life, which proves our version of god."
Also YECs: "The laws of the universe were drastically changed during the flood, which explains all the problems with our beliefs."
@Eminent Domain Prove it.
@Eminent Domain bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha
@Eminent Domain "Jesus sustains the cosmos" prove Jesus is real.
@Eminent Domain Everybody knows Jesus is real is not proof, try again.
@Eminent Domain I don't have to refute you. You haven't proven anything with your 16 hours of cursory research m8. If you had you'd be getting that Nobel prize m8. You ain't, you didn't, you won't. You made an hilarious claim. You wanna give some evidence for this hilarity, go ahead, make me laugh some more.
Contradicting an opponent who can pull "miracle" out of their pocket for anything they can't come up with a explanation for must just be infuriating...
Not really. Once they reach to the bottom of that barrel and start throwing out "miracle" it stops being a debate, and becomes a laughing stock
@Eminent Domain bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha
Once they say miracle we say theology. Go teach it in those classes, it's not science.
Creationist logic: "As long as you don't look at the numbers, we could be right. There's no way to tell."
Gosh I enjoy these videos. You are all over the facts, your rebuttals are clear and well grounded but the best thing is how much I giggle! Thanks 😊
Heh, HYPERCANES? How would a big - WOODEN - boat survive one year of these?
@N/A They better build it from Vibranium, Adamantium and Unobtanium then cause i just passed the place where Oard mocks the Hydroplate theory for claiming the "fountains of the depth" shot comets and asteroids into transsolar orbits... that much force and the (`comparatively much lighter than your average asteroid or comet) Spaceshuttle-Ark goes into time dilation modus And could they even close their ONE window everybody aboard breathed through? I only remember the DOOR being locked, not the window...
@@Ugly_German_Truths and then the methane build up and Co amd CO2 build up already deadly because of the one Window.... Wellllll...
I'm glad that you're inconsistent about wether or not you will respond to creationists, because I love seeing your responses to them! Please keep up that inconsistency so we have more awesome videos!👍
@Eminent Domain The FitnessGram™ Pacer Test is a multistage aerobic capacity test that progressively gets more difficult as it continues. The 20 meter pacer test will begin in 30 seconds. Line up at the start. The running speed starts slowly, but gets faster each minute after you hear this signal. [beep] A single lap should be completed each time you hear this sound. [ding] Remember to run in a straight line, and run as long as possible. The second time you fail to complete a lap before the sound, your test is over. The test will begin on the word start. On your mark, get ready, start.
Anyone can copy-paste nonsense.
@Eminent Domain It doesn't matter what your opinions are, you are copy-pasting on comments, no-one is going to pay you any attention, you might even get blocked by youtube's system if you don't wise-up.
@Eminent Domain Wow, what arrogant bullshit. How to say you do not actually understand Cosmology without saying it? yes you nailed that. I doubt anything you say to be true.
@Eminent Domain You are probably getting your comments deleted because people are reporting it as spam.
@Eminent Domain Not necessarily, if enough people report you for spam often enough, like I am doing, UA-cam will do it themselves.
video, paraphrased: "after 4500 equivalent methods of removing heat."
me: ah well, that graph doesn't look _too bad,_ right?
video, continues: "we're still at the temperature of the surface of the sun."
Well, dayum.
We actually did and do live with dinosaurs, they're just substantially smaller, fly, and wake my ass up at 3 in the morning.
Thanks for the chuckle. I love knowledgeable people debunking YECs and other. Great vlog 😁
Shout out from Sydney Austraila!!!
Love your work Gutsick.
I've noticed that YEC when I bring up I'm a qualified theologian, they no longer want to discuss theology but instead immediately switch scientific topics.
Then have the gall to complain when I direct them to scientists here on UA-cam. I direct them to Aron Ra (biologist) Potholer54 (geologist) and Thunderf00t (nuclear physicist.) They accuse me of dodging their questions whilst refusing to answer any of my questions!
@Eminent Domain bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha
@Eminent Domain I honestly can't decide if you're being sarcastic or genuine 🤷🏼♀️
@@ladyselenafelicitywhite1596 or if they're being modern or moderate! 😂
In my former life I was an attorney for the Tennessee Dept. of Environment and Conservation. As part of my responsibilities I represented a division the whose staff geologist was a YEC. It was distracting to say the least.
I truly support your consistent attacks on those AIG idjits¹,², at any time you wish to do so, Erika! It's so much fun to watch!
@Eminent Domain bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha
@@JosephKano you should start doing what I do - report him for spam. Better than getting reported for spam yourself.
@Eminent Domain Lovely Spam! Wonderful Spam!
Lovely Spam! Wonderful Spam
I do agree that online YEC's won't let us talk on our subjects of expertise, but they are highly insistent that we stick to their very specific and very predictable scripts. Standing For Ooof is super good at that as he can draw a naïve person onto his script within a few sentences. His channel seems to be full of those things he calls "rescue devices" while accusing scientists of using them. A global hypercane seems to be the definition of a rescue device, but I'd say "God did it" is the OG rescue device.
a veritable deus ex machina, if you will :)
Just found your channel and I’m loving it! You do such a great job of sharing your excitement and enthusiasm for the beautiful science of evolution.
One more my dear you hit it out of the park. Thank you, thank you.
These are the videos that to anyone open to changing their minds and embracing reality need to give them to push to truly understand the world around them
Absolutely love how jordan gave them the most generous numbers of a planet wide hyper-cane at 5 times their own proposed effeciency, and they still only got rid of 0.02% of their problem, lol
New to the channel and been enjoying your content . As a Catholic Christian that loves science , you doing a great job refuting YEC.
The divider is when you let your believe affect what science you accept, not if you believe in a god or not. Keep curiosity and you might become an atheist in the end. Greetings from a life long atheist.
So you’re saying you’re a Christian that believes in the stupid evolution hypothesis? That’s Understandable I believed in both too for at least ten years starting when my high school teacher lied to me that evolution had evidence and was in any way true.
At 5:08: "Multiple Indiana Jones Cosplayers" had me literally laughing out loud. Good thing I work from home 🤣
Great video! I also wanna say how I love the intro. I like the music and visuals.
There is still something bothering me. If God wanted to get rid of sinners etc. Why use a flood? Can't he just Thanos snap everyone out of existence apart from Noah etc.?? If that was the case, then these creationists wouldn't have these heat problems.
The only consistent answer I've heard from the YEC side is he wanted to leave a physical scar of judgement on the earth. Which tbh, I can see that making sense. But you need to buy into the YEC truly global flood for that to make sense. That starts a whole debate with Old Earth Creationists, which is fun to watch from the sidelines
They’ve got more than heat problems but I know what you mean.
And even if he wanted to scar the land….it’s god. He could thanos snap it and scar it. …but it’s the same god that couldn’t think of a better way to cleanse our original sin, which he created, knowingly, than by sending a son on a suicide mission. …why not a giant floating mountain? At least then when someone asks, do you believe in god,” and you say nope, they can then say, “but what about the floating mountain?” “…oh yeah forgot about that, yeah I believe…”
@Eminent Domain bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha
@Eminent Domain you are, very blatantly, a person suffering from Dunning Kruger Effect of a terminal severity with a side of theologically based egocentric bias. Baseless, evidenceless statements of your "miraculous" GAWD bestowed intellect? Link the debates you've partaken in where you achieve these things you're claiming, otherwise it's Hitchens Razor.
@Eminent Domain I can believe you've answered all the questions. But did you give correct answers?
Just the right level of snark in this one. Perfect for a weekend that included time spent in my local museum's brand new Rise of Life Gallery, and a dive (pun not intended, but hey, it works) into cetacean evolution.
Really love your work. I spend way to much time talking to YEC's, and your detailed videos Really help
Another delicious video, with many a source I wasn't aware of for TIP. Except a mention in Rocks 2.
I just found your channel and I’m loving the intelligent arguments, conversational tone, and the production value! Keep up the great work 😊
Hey, since you read all the comments, thank you very much for this extremely entertaining video. I know it takes a lot of time to put something like this together and I really appreciate the level of amusement here. Please, please, please, maintain your level of understated humor and keep using words that might go over the heads of schoolchildren: that's how they learn.
Upvoted and subscribed. Keep being awesome.
Let alone the fact that since Mt. Ararat is a volcano it would be actively forming when Noah lands on it.
I'll go ahead and be THAT GUY...
Genesis says Noah landed on the "mountains of Ararat", not on Mt. Ararat. So all those people looking for the Ark have been looking in the wrong area.
@Eminent Domain lol your funny
@Eminent Domain bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha
@Eminent Domain that's even funnier to think you're smarter than the experts
@Eminent Domain Same apes are. I have been about 2 meters from a wild mountain greyback (300 kg of mussle) and it was one of the most gentle animals I have ever encountered. Being very carefull not to scare me.
I just found your channel. Love it, thank you!
Both HILARIOUS and BRUTAL.
I love it.
Thank you for this video.
I've had the similar argument too, too often with people at church, that it seems that YEC always, always, always argue about things not in their purview of their discipline. Engineers tell us about geology, geologists tell us about biology, biologists tell us about astrophysics, astrophysicists try to explain everything in terms of engineering.
Could it be, possibly, the people in the various fields of study KNOW the weaknesses in the arguments presented? And so instead of saying "Hey, guys, I've ran the numbers/studied that, and it doesn't really work", they focus on a different field than the one they know, because how different can they really be.
I've often said that a first year student in just about any discipline can beat a YEC in a debate. And UA-cam has shown that I'm correct.
@Eminent Domain Stop spamming.
@Eminent Domain I'm a Christian also.
And I doubt you, or anyone else, can refute a person with advanced degrees. Unless, as usually happens, you end the discussion with "GOD! The Bible!! I WIN!!!" Which, honestly, doesn't work, and explains nothing.
GOD created the laws that govern our universe. And GOD created the science that many, many people have studied for HUNDREDS of years, and who have checked and cross-checked each other. And that science says the universe and the Earth are way old.
A conceptual model that explains what has happened in the past, in line with what we know about the various fields of science, and makes testable predictions cannot be done with YEC. You have to bend and twist and spindle and ignore a lot of a lot of the science.
What is the ultimate answer? I don't know that. But I have no doubt it does not lie in YEC.
@Eminent Domain You might want to shore up your own false god before you branch out into science. Your god is omniscient but regrets things and changes his mind (1 Samuel 15:11). Your god is omnipotent but loses a wrestling match. (Genesis 32:24-30). Your god is omnipresent but needs to send angels to check on events (Genesis 18:21). And your god is omnibenevolent but creates humans already knowing which ones will go to Hell and burn forever.
Evolution by Natural Selection has been shown to be fact for over 150 years. All attempts to disprove it have failed miserably. Meanwhile, I can falsify your god with a few sentences.
Might be time for you to take that beam outta your eye.
@Eminent Domain By the way, I have started to report your copy-paste as spam.
@Eminent Domain Likely they don't respond because you are wrong, and they don't have the time to teach you what science properly tells us. And they probably get so many others sending them similar materials telling them that others know more than those that have given years of their lives studying and seeking to understand.
I have the most rudimentary of understanding of physics, and I regularly am able to refute what so many YEC supporters on UA-cam, among others, say. With simple questions that YECs don't consider, or lack enough knowledge to grasp or understand.
Thanks for fixing audio issues
Thank you Erica. Your Videos always let me smile and giggle ^^
'this video is unnecessary, but I'm going to make it'
I think that's the youtube motto.
Very informative,
I can see why for those that believe in the flood to see as good points what creationists say that validates the flood story do to how complicated the topic is. This is why they never debate the experts in the field. All they need is to look smart in a very difficult subject, pretending to have the answer when they know it’s just BS, but for those that are ignorant in the subject any explanation will fill the blank, no matter how stupid it is. Isn’t this what religion is all about? They are experts creating or selecting very difficult topics, talking as a authority about it and convincing those that have no expertise that this is the answer. It’s feeding on ignorance.
@Eminent Domain And there, ladies and gentlemen, we have a prime example of the arrogance of ignorance, right from the very first sentence.
@Eminent Domain bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha
@Eminent Domain oh you're hilarious!!! 16 hours of research, you've debunked a whole field of scientific enquiry! Where is the Nobel Committee to send you your prize m8! BWAHAHAHA!
@Eminent Domain excelente joke🤣
@Eminent Domain Do lecture us on thermodynamics, Professor.
This is pure gold.
this channel is a gem
This is delightful.
Oh yes Dr Lisle.... the heat could have gone INTO THE CORE. Energy ALWAYS goes from warm to cold until the temperature is egalized then it stops moving.
Meaning EVERYTHING outside of the Core would have to be HOTTER than the core to dump heat into it. And as it TODAY is still so many 1000° C hot, that would mean no liquid water and no wooden boat in that "outside of the Core" area... fantastic solution!
Seriously, he is at least a PHYSICIST, shouldn't he know that much basics?
Could he not just say god guided the heat in there? :P
@Eminent Domain Dude, you can't even listen to a lady saying gentle and MODERN apes (and humans ARE anatomically, phylogenetically and optically undeniable apes) without fucking up and you have no clue of anything you said, but yes you can debunk the whole world of science with a bit of wankery and ignorance in 5 minutes flat.
Dream on. Of your god creating anything. Meanwhile the adults realize that nature shows zero signs of creation and all the signs of chaos and "works well enough" adaptation.
Creationists are pathetic incompetent liars. Is that who you want to be up to the day you die and find out you bet on the wrong pony, wasting your life in hopes of "another" one behind the curtain of death? Then do so without making so much noise and embarassing everybody around you for your sillyness.
There is no need for plate movement or a heat problem with a God-produced flood, but YEC's have dug their own graves where they have tethered their horse to magical things and now have to use their God as a rescue device. So now they have to add miracles to the story left and right to try and save it, when God only needed one miracle to poof 10 miles of water on the Earth to accomplish the task in the Bible.
@@Uhdksurvhunter hed can say alot, like that one "explanation" used miracles for everything. But they cannot prove that and thus that makes no valid model nor a good explanation.
As Aron Ra would say: if you can't show it you don't know it. (and whatever our religious friend there thinks he shows... not much knowledge in there either)
@@Ugly_German_Truths I agree with that sentiment, but they dont.
So in their mind, they are correct in assuming miracles can fill in all the gaps in their knowledge.
Forget a naturalistic explanation for the flood. The creationists will say that God solved all these problems with a miracle. Just like he did with all of drowned vegetation that somehow survived.
Exactly. Okham's razor genuinely destroys young Earth creationism.
Which is fine. It's theology then, not science and they can wander off and teach it in those theology classes and never the twain shall meet. That's the real issue. They keep trying to shoehorn it into science and it just doesn't fit.
@@JosephKano If they're attributing everything to "miracles", they've taken themselves out of the realm of science and should just drop the deceptive facade.
@@tkat6442 correct. The moment they have to say 'god dunnit with a miracle' they break away from science and can be ignored. It's immediately not scientific. It has no mechanism or naturalistic explanation? Great. Fine. Just don't dare claim any science supports you.
@@JosephKano But that is precisely the problem. They insist that science supports a literal interpretation of the Bible. It doesn't. Period.
I love this channel so much! I learn so much about so many things and the snark is absolutely exquisite!
Love the MFB cartoons! 😎👍
(And as an added bonus, I got to see this twice as new upload! 😉 )
So good. To me, an outsider, and someone who was never religious, I find it hard to believe they need the Bible so much. It so obviously is just a stinky dusty old thing.
Sounds like you need to clean your library! Seriously though, the Bible's fantastic, in the proper meaning of the word. It's a great work of fiction that no-one should live their life by.
@@carlpeberdy9086 yep the bit about beating another human to near death if he is your slave - great fiction.
The tedium of how to build an alter, riveting stuff.
How priests should decide what is a disease, most enlightening.
Nah, nothing in this awful book is worthy to be even read, try David Hulme or Shakespeare.
How is a book stinky? Could it be your heart is a bit stinky not wanting to face reality. Check out the Gospel Message of the Bible and then decide.
@@sheldon3811 I did .
Example 1: Ephesians 6.5 jesus states that slaves must obey their masters.
Do you believe that one human should own another (because the immoral monster and protagonist of your dreadful gospel did) ?
I know you do not, you are better than this jesus.
Please reply with the usual nonsense that "slavery" was different in those days.
I am going to enjoy this. Wait till i tell you where Jesus said to hate your parents.
@@sheldon3811 There are many beautiful things in the bible, but it is not true - the gospels don't even agree with each other. Sorry, but as far as 'Truth' goes, it's no better than 'The Lord of the Rings'.
A OHKO for Noahs flood myth is founders effect. If true you would genetically see founders effect going outward from Mt. Ararat, and we do not see that.
A joy as always! Thanks for the fun video
Erica you are a star. I have only recently discovered you and thus far I have thoroughly enjoyed each of your vids that I’ve watched. Clever, funny and very entertaining. Thank you
This habit of the YEC community is rather telling. I mean, if i had a PhD of genetics on my staff...i'd really be wanting them to explain how genetics proves a young earth or disproves evolution. Surely she understands the slam dunk evidence in that field better than the good great evidence in geology?
She does; that's why she avoids it.
Why on earth do these people swim upstream SO HARD in the face of overwhelming and complete evidence? Is their God such a dick that he blesses those who "explain away" stuff best? Mr. Aircraft Engineer wouldn't have a job if science operated like YEC (and we would all be on horseback lucky to survive childhood). Most Christians are Ancient Earth Creationists, these ones are extra silly!
Anyway thanks for making this all so funny and interesting to watch! 🦍
First time I've caught this channel. Edifying.
“He said that volcanoes did it.”
Me, who learned about the three types of rocks in third grade: Haha, he’s an idiot.
Great video! Thanks for the additional education. I'm just a biologist, but I like to expand my arguments against YECs.
Entertaining and informative as ever.
I adore the opening song & animation, also some in-video short animations!
Imagine worshipping a deity who requires and rewards ever-increasingly convoluted and tortured “logic” in order to keep from learning anything. Wow.
Hey Erika, love your videos but the clips audio is often a degree louder than your videos, which requires lowering and increasing the volume to maintain a comfortable level, especially while in bed when it’s quiet :) would you mind making sure it’s a consistent baseline across the videos? Appreciate you!
Agreed. You have great material to add, but I find you rather quiet compared with many of the clips.
I feel very confident in speaking outside my field of expertise when I say Erica is a most excellent educator ape.
I have a Geology degree. I also have a degree in Aeronautical Engineering which I got because rocks couldn't pay the bills.
Brilliant and funny! I was very entertained, educated & enlightened!
Thank you, you rad human!!
Recently subscribed and absolutely digging the content. Well done. 👍👍
Yes, there have been many enormous floods due to glacial lake dams catastrophically breaking.
@Eminent Domain bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha Bwahahhaahahahaha
Those are fascinating. Those glacial lake dam flood things. Incredible stuff.
That's was so awesome 👌 👏 👍 thank you for your time and effort to destroy these YEC and their ignorance 😀
Dr. Lisle talking about the problems with the heat problem sound very much like George Lucas explaining how in the prequels "each stanza kinda rhymes with the next one"
This video needed to end with a Mortal Kombat 10 BRUTALITY.
Great video. These people are a mess. I'm a believer but common sense alone tells me that YEC (especially) are talking nonsense. One of my great interests is geology but I would never pontificate on the geology of any given area unless I have read up extensively on that area. And in any case I don't consider myself to be a professional. I've listened to a number of of videos and their ignorance is abysmal. Love your Busts, bite-size or large scale. Keep up the great work.
Grasping for straws becomes futile if said straws are several thousand degrees hot. It's a bit sad to see grown up people desperately try to come up with "reasons" for why they are right despite of all the evidence in the world. YECs are just Flerfs with a slightly different starting point.
Funny how happy they are to admit that there are lots of things they don't (yet) know, yet they demand definitive answers on pre-big bang conditions and abiogenesis, areas of study that are still very new and where (not surprisingly) information is still unknown.
The correlation between people who talk out of their area of expertise and people who talk out of their posterior is striking. Especially among apologists
I'd love to see a series dubunking genetics 'papers' in the Journal of Creation, or maybe someone's already done that.
Anyone at a creationist organization willing to fly on a plane that was maintained by an auto-mechanic? I mean, that knowledge is close enough to be relevant, right?
Or visit a podiatrist to get their lung cancer dealt with. Those systems are all adjacent, so no issues there, right?
Every member of the Creationist Cherrypicking Consortium is a hypocrite. The hypocrisy arises when the loonies (cheerfully?) use the other fruits of the scientific endeavour to further their aims.
Like, for a start, anything that uses electricity, or anything made of plastic. Or, of course, the Internet! Few of the CCC loonies are logical about this (or about anything, for that matter).
If they were, just imagine the effect (perish the thought) of an accident at home. No quick smartphone call for an ambulance. Instead, out to the back garden, light a fire, send up a smoke signal, wait for the local shaman to see it, finish what he's doing, grab her bag of herbs and potions, harness up her chariot and trot over (hopefully in time to help).
That's life without modern science for you! The so-called "Good old days"! aka Ecclesiastes 1 v9. "Nah, hypocrisy is better" they say. "Let's just hope no one notices!"
The guy that knows that we don't know things, doesn't know where he's going with his argument.
Absolutely brilliant! Love it!
Rather than try to figure out scientific sounding "explanations" why don't they just say "miracles" and end it there? They believe in an all powerful god who can create everything including the laws of physics.
Exactly!! They just use sciency sounding language because they think it'll make them sound smart and fool people. One unwitting giveaway is their mispronunciation of nuclear as "NOO-Q-LRR". Not impressive.
Gutsick Gibbon is also a Gutsy Gibbon :)
I would never hold a position that could not and can not be defended. This is why you should not be emotionally attached to a belief or an idea because you'll defend it against truth.
I love your intro!!!
At least that one guy Bob Enyart is aware of the problem with invoking Magic/Miracles for every time they face a problem. There might be hope for him yet.
Bob Enyart died of COVID some months ago
@@mr_wilford1123 Bummer....
In my total amateur opinion, even if I grant fully what YEC say...wouldn't an event that's spewing out heat and radiation that makes the sun look like an easy bake oven leave very noticeable and testable damage to planets,moons and other celestial bodies around us?
exactly that heat just does not disappear, we not only would see its effects on other planetary bodies and whatnot but we would also see the heat and radiation still out there.
We'd need our shades indoors still people. That sucker is gonna glow.
Honestly it's like I say to YECs
You want to teach YEC in schools? Fine, teach it in theology classes where it belongs. Stop stuffing about trying to shoehorn it into science, just claim 'MIRACLES' and walk away.
the lengths that people go to justify a bronze age fairy tale are totally amazing. they could apply the same methods to "prove" that the sun is actually Apollo's chariot racing across the sky.
Thanks for another amazing 🤩 presentations