Boeing Insitu ScanEagle Operations

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 жов 2013
  • Video by Petty Officer 1st Class James Stilipec American Forces Network Afghanistan
    Military and civilian UAV operators help keep a watchful eye on US, Coalition and Afghan troops on the ground. Soundbites include CDR Dave Shay - ScanEagle OIC and Jeff Offenberg - ScanEagle UAV Operator. Produced by MC1 James Stilipec.
    Click to subscribe! bit.ly/subAIRBOYD
    The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement. #AIRBOYD #AvGeek
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 256

  • @stevesprinceofsteaks
    @stevesprinceofsteaks 10 років тому +11

    Some of the Scan Eagle guys were on our base at Ripley and Cole in Tarin Kowt , Afghanistan. Good guys. Know they did good job and provided good intel to SF. One guy was real tall from Azle, TX down the road from me. Can't remember his name. We used to flick crap at each other a lot. Hope they are all safe.

  • @hassans111
    @hassans111 10 років тому +10

    *)General characteristics
    Crew: none on-board
    Length: 3.9 feet (1.19 meters)
    Wingspan: 10.2 feet (3.1 meters)
    Loaded weight: 39.7 lbs (18 kilograms)
    Powerplant: 1 × 3W 2-stroke piston engine, 1.5 hp
    *)Performance
    Maximum speed: 55-80 mph
    Endurance: 20 + hours
    Service ceiling: 16,000 feet above ground level (4,876 meters)
    *)Avionics
    High resolution, day/night camera and thermal imager
    *)Each ScanEagle system costs US$3.2 million (2006).[2] A complete system comprises four air vehicles or AVs, a ground control station, remote video terminal, and the Skyhook launch and recovery system.

    • @bozokriletic891
      @bozokriletic891 9 років тому

      Mr. Sofian,
      Can you please tell mi where I can find specification for this system, because I have foundes some, but it is different, so now I dont know what is correct!!! Thanks

    • @hassans111
      @hassans111 9 років тому +3

      Bozo Kriletic
      =this specifications can be found at the:
      *) website of USAF www.af.mil/AboutUs/FactSheets/Display/tabid/224/Article/104532/scan-eagle.aspx
      *) globaluv.net/scaneagle/
      *) www.navysealmuseum.org/home-to-artifacts-from-the-secret-world-of-naval-special-warfare/unmanned-aerial-vehicle-uav-scan-eagle
      =other specifications (as wikipedia gives them:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_Insitu_ScanEagle) at the
      website of the constructor "insitu" www.insitu.com/systems/scaneagle
      =other specifications at the
      website of the constructor "boeing" www.boeing.com/boeing/defense-space/military/scaneagle/index.page
      =a modified scaneagle uav ,looks like a scaneagle, that is called "integrator" globaluv.net/integrator/
      In conclusion, the difference in specifications is returned to two versions or more of scaneagle

    • @itzshaun369
      @itzshaun369 Рік тому

      Seems rather pricey. It looks not much different than a model/hobby drone. I'm sure it is, and I'm sure it's got good optics, but I can't see why it is so expensive, it nearly costs its weight in gold. The case it comes in is cool too the way it lifts up so you can assemble it.

  • @phil123711
    @phil123711 10 років тому +1

    Worth every cent.

  • @JulieAV
    @JulieAV 10 років тому +1

    Thanks for sharing this one

  • @ArcturanMegadonkey
    @ArcturanMegadonkey 10 років тому +3

    That is some cool shit!
    I used to fly model aircraft, fixed wing, helicopters and jets and OMG it's come a long way in the last 10 years

  • @HoopesJohnC
    @HoopesJohnC Рік тому

    Glad to see my CH products gear being used there. :D

  • @pofrani
    @pofrani 8 років тому +1

    This is so cool!

  • @gonzalezea
    @gonzalezea 6 років тому

    awesome !!

  • @repalmore
    @repalmore 3 роки тому +3

    We had a pneumatic launcher that we wanted to test and we decided the a variable load weight would give us practice in launching different UAVs. We used pumpkins. Surprised they held together during launch but the landing was predictable.

  • @guoli6841
    @guoli6841 8 років тому

    very nice

  • @SavageGerbil
    @SavageGerbil 10 місяців тому

    I was wondering how they handled landing, I did not expect the fly paper method

  • @fahadzia5038
    @fahadzia5038 2 роки тому

    Was this shot in one of the GCC countries?

  • @lotanerve
    @lotanerve 10 років тому +1

    We're watching you.

  • @jdrodriguez2001
    @jdrodriguez2001 Рік тому

    En su momento fue un gran avance, el sistema de lanzamiento y el de recuperacion parecen aparatosos pero teniendo en cuenta que es un dron de despegue horizontal pues el sistema resulta muy eficiente debido a que lo puedes lanzar y capturar en cualquier region del mundo pues llevas una pista aerea portatil.
    El elemento que inicializa la propulsion resulta muy sencillo y practico.

  • @esmailalrefaei6236
    @esmailalrefaei6236 9 років тому

    gooooood

  • @ReviewLife380
    @ReviewLife380 10 років тому

    Nice... Technology

  • @valeriyrednikov5462
    @valeriyrednikov5462 6 років тому +1

    It is a vertical cable (rope) and it may land no more 150 lb., and it worse than horizontal one (see patent 8,313,057) which has landing weight of a airplane in excess of 20000 kg.

    • @MrDonald911
      @MrDonald911 5 років тому

      Is it you who invented it ? :D You have the same name as the patent owner lol

  • @jalan4524
    @jalan4524 7 років тому

    Wings are very strong !

  • @ollinayato
    @ollinayato 8 років тому

    My best friend is in this business. Same place too.

  • @donaldasayers
    @donaldasayers 3 роки тому

    Tiny portable drone, huge fecking great launch system.

  • @ClementAllen
    @ClementAllen 10 років тому +14

    That looks a harsh landing :P

    • @howthingswork2135
      @howthingswork2135 2 роки тому +1

      Now this drone is talibans hands and now they are going to sell to pakistan and china for reverse enginnering

    • @howthingswork2135
      @howthingswork2135 2 роки тому +1

      @Shinshocks same way in osama bin ladin operation stealth helicopter US army leave behind and pakistan and china work on it now they have same type of helicopters and stealth jets made in pakistan .....technology transferd

    • @taniland276
      @taniland276 2 роки тому

      Lol it never landed. 😂😂

  • @tmac20031
    @tmac20031 6 років тому +25

    Talk about an overengineered launch system

    • @tunisianpartisan1080
      @tunisianpartisan1080 3 роки тому +6

      Because as i know, it is made to be carried on ships easily, as this uav is for navies, coast guards and all

    • @howthingswork2135
      @howthingswork2135 2 роки тому +4

      Now this drone is talibans hands and now they are going to sell to pakistan and china for reverse enginnering

    • @zainullahkhattak
      @zainullahkhattak 2 роки тому

      @@howthingswork2135🤣😂😂🤣😂😂😂

    • @tallalbintahir3758
      @tallalbintahir3758 2 роки тому +2

      @@zainullahkhattak phatti pari hei becharo ki..🤣😂🤣😂🤣

    • @debojitghosh2197
      @debojitghosh2197 2 роки тому

      @@tallalbintahir3758 America chalo hargaya
      Apke abbu ab v tumhari marta rahega samjhe 90000 yaad ha Bangladesh abhi Balochistan v paida karenge tension mat ke

  • @cimjoeino
    @cimjoeino 10 років тому +2

    haha I was gonna say this looks just like my skywalker X8 but man i need a case like that from the beginning of the video!!

  • @jtveg
    @jtveg 3 роки тому +2

    Is that the best method for retrieving the drone?
    It seems like it may be unreliable or could easily damage it.

  • @MrDonald911
    @MrDonald911 5 років тому

    why does he uses a " circular saw " to turn on the propellers ? Is it better to do it that way rather than the remote controlled way ?

    • @darkhollowhomestead9088
      @darkhollowhomestead9088 2 роки тому

      Not quite a rotary saw, more of a pneumatic impact or drill.
      If they start it manually (being a gas engine) this doesn’t require a quite heavy battery and starter, by winding up to speed a petrol engine if the ignition circuit is closed you can actually cause it to achieve combustion (similar to how a model t started or even a lot of modern prop planes).
      I’m sure it still has a good battery, but it wouldn’t need to be a large one capable of starting an engine

  • @tjblues01
    @tjblues01 10 років тому +3

    Expensive - yes. Because it is a whole system and not only RC plane. (BTW. it looks very tough).
    IMO it is bit too complicated as for field operations. A catapult, arrest system... I think those systems should be as compact as the plane container. The plane should be able to take off from rocky road and land on parachute.
    I like very much the way how they connect wings to fuselage with retractable servo wires / ribbon.
    cheers

    • @wonderbreadjumps
      @wonderbreadjumps 6 років тому +1

      tjblues01 there are other UAVs that don't need a catapult and arresting system. Those can't fly for 24 hours though. It does what it was designed to do very well.

    • @mihaiilie8808
      @mihaiilie8808 3 роки тому +1

      In 2020 you can build something like this for just 500 dollars( excluding the flir camera if it has one).

    • @tjblues01
      @tjblues01 3 роки тому +1

      @@mihaiilie8808 For $500 you can get a "park flyer" made of aerofoam with cheap radio... Decent quality FVP planes able to fly miles away from a pilot are way more expensive.

    • @mihaiilie8808
      @mihaiilie8808 3 роки тому

      @@tjblues01 this is just an fpv wing and its 2020 wich in case you dont know ,powerfull transmitters and receivers ,well over the legal limit cost about 30 dollars on Ebay .
      For less than 500 dollars i can build you a diesel electric hexacopter able to fly 3-4 hours and do better reconaisance ,take off and land better and a wing like this one would be a lot cheaper.

  • @jonj.j.williamsonphotograp175
    @jonj.j.williamsonphotograp175 6 років тому

    Specs?

  • @wrzkace1
    @wrzkace1 Рік тому

    whhooaa too cool

  • @tomtiny
    @tomtiny 3 роки тому

    Can it carry a gopro?

  • @Aleki_34090
    @Aleki_34090 Рік тому +2

    nice thing for Ukraine. thanks, partners!

    • @ttcc5273
      @ttcc5273 Рік тому

      🇺🇸🤝🇺🇦
      I’m sure Scan Eagle will play a part in liberating Ukraine from the rashist invaders!
      Slava Ukrayini ❤️🇺🇦

  • @taciodasilva8291
    @taciodasilva8291 3 місяці тому

    Brazilian navy bought some of this system. It will be more difficult to operate it on rough sea.

  • @JoseMendoza-mc8ic
    @JoseMendoza-mc8ic 3 роки тому

    Autonomy of this thing??

  • @war_leaks
    @war_leaks 2 роки тому +3

    I was reading on twitter that Afghan Mujahideen has almost more than 10 of these drones and they will be sending 1 to china and russia for reverse engineering.

    • @blakespower
      @blakespower 2 роки тому +1

      to be fair China probably has more advanced drones the Mavic is made their

    • @war_leaks
      @war_leaks 2 роки тому

      @@blakespower I didn't know dji was made in china. But personally i would say china is after US military tech cause america has the most advanced weapons and military tech right now.

  • @ibrahimalishah527
    @ibrahimalishah527 2 роки тому

    Beutful durn

  • @sottyuk
    @sottyuk 10 років тому +1

    Thats the way commercial aircraft should take off and land!!

  • @wadewilson2361
    @wadewilson2361 3 роки тому

    Yeet!

  • @bobobobo3142
    @bobobobo3142 2 роки тому +2

    We captured 4 of these today in Afghanistan, I came here to learn how these work so that we can use them against Afghan Army.

    • @bobobobo3142
      @bobobobo3142 2 роки тому

      where did you guys put that catapult thingy? We are unable to find it here.

    • @bobobobo3142
      @bobobobo3142 2 роки тому

      never mind. afghan army surrendered without any fight. now we get to sell these to china in scrap.

    • @jmpompey1
      @jmpompey1 2 роки тому

      @@bobobobo3142 They entered service in 2005, China has way more advanced drones than these

  • @doodleydoo
    @doodleydoo 3 роки тому +1

    US Drones Technology is very complicated to use. Turkish one is in 3 minutes ready to fly. And they don't need net catchers. They landing anywhere. I thing this drone is not created for mobilty using anywhere.

  • @rougehawk
    @rougehawk 7 років тому +1

    I thought that looked like KAF ;)

  • @maricidevamega939
    @maricidevamega939 3 роки тому +1

    So Boeing didn't even bother to add two little wheels for the UAV container?

  • @Tublerbells
    @Tublerbells 10 років тому +4

    Wonderful idea of fool-proof assembling!

  • @user-cx6bj9vy1x
    @user-cx6bj9vy1x 3 роки тому

    الحمد لله تم اسقاطها في اليمن

  • @thomassmithUTUBE
    @thomassmithUTUBE 10 років тому +17

    He need to clean his keybored.

  • @thelovertunisia
    @thelovertunisia 4 роки тому +2

    I think these small UAVs are more versatile than the big ones that are almost as large as a fighter.

    • @aleonflex6611
      @aleonflex6611 4 роки тому

      But can they travel long distance like big ones?

    • @thelovertunisia
      @thelovertunisia 4 роки тому +1

      @@aleonflex6611 no of course not but they are intended for a different mission profile.

  • @azouzbachouche6501
    @azouzbachouche6501 8 років тому

    World record of UAV crashes is the Scan Eagle according de Google!!!

  • @Tynitty
    @Tynitty 10 років тому +1

    Pretty cool I want one lol

    • @Quierosaberm
      @Quierosaberm 9 років тому +1

      Yeah, but you'll have to wait 'till christmas.

  • @guoli6841
    @guoli6841 8 років тому

    How can I save this video?

    • @romano5497
      @romano5497 8 років тому +2

      Google it u dumb fuck

  • @80pgm
    @80pgm 5 років тому +1

    el dron con todo su equipo para hacerlo despegar etc. resulta ser tan aparatoso como un avión de vigilancia.. supuesta mente no debería ser así.. debería ser mucho mas sencillo y portátil..

  • @generalx5220
    @generalx5220 3 роки тому

    But does it have the wifi? And 5G?

  • @tjblues01
    @tjblues01 10 років тому +10

    It's dirt cheap; $3.2 million. 4 UAVs, a catapult and arrest system.

    • @afm2084
      @afm2084 4 роки тому +1

      and china can just make a version of their own for a cost of 20 times cheaper..

    • @tjblues01
      @tjblues01 4 роки тому +3

      @@afm2084 First, they have to steal technology from somebody else, then they can make those thing 20 x cheaper. Bro, China has a big problem to build they own and reliable jet engine capable of super cruise (i.e. sustained supersonic flight)

    • @mihaiilie8808
      @mihaiilie8808 3 роки тому

      @@tjblues01 its because they dont want slow jet engines and they build fast ones that dont resist much.
      Like a sport car vs a family car where the sport car wears faster than the family car.
      If you want slow planes just use propellers.

    • @tjblues01
      @tjblues01 3 роки тому

      @@mihaiilie8808 And that's what I said. China has long history of problems with design of fast and reliable jet engines.

    • @mihaiilie8808
      @mihaiilie8808 3 роки тому

      @@tjblues01 you cant have fast and reliable.Fast planes like Migs ,fry the motors fast.They are build for war not to train your pilot skills in them.

  • @REDCRANE1944
    @REDCRANE1944 5 років тому

    JUST READ THE COAST GUARD HAS TESTED THIS AND WILL BE USING THEM ON THE CUTTERS.

  • @sadiqbashao7
    @sadiqbashao7 7 років тому

    Cool landing😂

  • @bro9479
    @bro9479 6 років тому

    Is there not a more efficient way of launching these things than using an entire trailer slingshot?

  • @chaizgabyano3243
    @chaizgabyano3243 5 років тому

    Can we use it at night?

  • @marcocarmelo1
    @marcocarmelo1 7 років тому

    could you please tell me about the price of this UAV? Thanks

  • @guoli6841
    @guoli6841 8 років тому

    How can I save this vedio?

    • @BachuVashu
      @BachuVashu 8 років тому

      add "ss" before word youtube in this adress

  • @candidone8544
    @candidone8544 Рік тому

    Back in the day, was an Army drone control systems tech in W. Germany, in build-up reaction to Cuban Missile Crisis. Was first-generation transistorized circuitry. Used JATO launching from simple folding rack. Surveillance drones were flying camera platforms, no video. Recovery used parachute deployment which switched-off engine. Photo techs then retrieved camera and film canister. Small remote control console on portable stand was for line-of-sight, but accompanying radar trailer was guidance for low-visibility and over-local-horizon control...again, no video. Drone was about 12-ft.+ in length, about same wing span, front prop, loud gas engine. JATO launching was telltale, could give away location far easier than new pneumatic launch technique. Sixty years of change and much better.

  • @RETSZTIRF
    @RETSZTIRF 10 років тому

    video games!

  • @raven1462
    @raven1462 6 років тому +1

    I build these.

  • @snowvalleyrat
    @snowvalleyrat 9 років тому +2

    I don't get how it catches the wire, I don't see a hook?

    • @sanctoulto
      @sanctoulto 9 років тому +3

      Frank Pirolo Small titanium hooks on each wingtip, just under the winglet. You can see it at 1:06 and 1:30 when he's attaching the wing.

    • @Professor_Taiga-Vanguard
      @Professor_Taiga-Vanguard 9 років тому +2

      Frank Pirolo I never even considered how it landed, this mechanism was unexpected.

  • @ebosowawo437
    @ebosowawo437 8 років тому +12

    I just graduated from pilot course this day

    • @romano5497
      @romano5497 8 років тому

      Who gives a fuck u stooge

    • @ebosowawo437
      @ebosowawo437 8 років тому +4

      Romano​ and why u look angry little loser...lol

    • @romano5497
      @romano5497 8 років тому

      eboso wawo Loser hey??? Fuck off you stooge and go fly ya toy you muppet.

    • @romano5497
      @romano5497 8 років тому

      Neosealand Freighters Google it you lazy stooge

    • @romano5497
      @romano5497 8 років тому

      Neosealand Freighters Oh really... Move on you fuckin dumbass fuckwit. Speak when your spoken to you loser

  • @kingsmanengland997
    @kingsmanengland997 6 років тому

    Is that a bloody grass cutter engine? Lol

  • @vinaykumar-ls6ti
    @vinaykumar-ls6ti 2 роки тому

    Captain phillips brought me here

  • @KevinJones-xq7tn
    @KevinJones-xq7tn 2 роки тому +2

    Really good video to show the Taliban
    How our Maschine works 👍🙄🙈

    • @frozen_durp5896
      @frozen_durp5896 2 роки тому

      Exaclty what I said. I saw a picture with them and I thought well let’s see if they know how to use it. Search it up and find this 😂😂

  • @thanhtang7681
    @thanhtang7681 5 років тому

    Có con này mà mang về Buôn Ma tuý có khi giàu nhất

  • @Kneedragon1962
    @Kneedragon1962 10 років тому +2

    Expensive? Depends what you compare it with. A manned recon aircraft? Think SR71 or U2. Even a Piper Cub with a GoPro and a recruit - it costs. A spy satellite?
    If you only compare it to other radio control aircraft, hobby stuff, yes, it's a bit over the top. But that's not a reasonable comparison, because that's not what it is.

  • @cactusfullmoon2597
    @cactusfullmoon2597 6 років тому

    very complicated operation..

  • @bro9479
    @bro9479 6 років тому +12

    Cool drone, cool video, but we don't really need to see replays of the guy walking up the steps from multiple views.

  • @cannontech7072
    @cannontech7072 3 роки тому

    Yo

  • @ericheng69
    @ericheng69 2 роки тому

    The way to launch and landing very troublesome !

  • @504yaj
    @504yaj 7 років тому

    Why the hell would they use ribbons to connect the electronics going to the wing when they can just use fixed connectors/plugs to make them modular 0_0

    • @wonderbreadjumps
      @wonderbreadjumps 6 років тому

      JayR Robles you think fixed connectors or plugs would last many recoveries with that arresting gear?

    • @markblix6880
      @markblix6880 4 роки тому

      Maybe they know why. Give them a call and tell them what you know.

  • @aslantsoutiev7938
    @aslantsoutiev7938 Рік тому

    Как всё допотопно.... И это современный дрон...мля...

  • @EnglishLawyer
    @EnglishLawyer Рік тому

    The people who think these things up and design them are damned clever

    • @candidone8544
      @candidone8544 Рік тому

      Amen. But realize how this is Nineties' tech. The Scan Eagle itself was born in 2002. More tech advances are likely since.

  • @kevinolesik1500
    @kevinolesik1500 9 років тому

    isn't this the coolest damn thing ?!? incredible endurance time for these drones ... something like 29 hours it can remain aloft

    • @freddykrueger5503
      @freddykrueger5503 9 років тому

      29 hours. holy moley

    • @sanctoulto
      @sanctoulto 9 років тому

      Kevin Olesik 24 hours at sea-level. Places at higher density altitudes like Afghanistan or higher heat like Iraq, it's much less than that due to launch weight/pressures.

    • @freddykrueger5503
      @freddykrueger5503 9 років тому +1

      Its more like 16 hours if it carries a payload and yes, the altitude at which it flies also affects its time in the air quite a lot. The higher it flies, the thinner the air, the more fuel it will burn to keep it in the air. Still an amazing looking machine though.

    • @epriley891
      @epriley891 9 років тому

      ***** Shoot, 16 hours is plenty of time for what it is designed to though right?

    • @freddykrueger5503
      @freddykrueger5503 9 років тому

      Its designed for surveillance so 12 to 16 hours is pretty good. Its too small to carry a weapon payload.

  • @TheVietarmy
    @TheVietarmy 5 років тому +2

    cheap and efficient UAV, vietnam is purchasing 6 of them, they will definitely work on china threat

  • @Logan-kn3gt
    @Logan-kn3gt 7 років тому

    Captain philips? Anyone?

  • @CGNINT
    @CGNINT 5 років тому +7

    ‏i am from iran. I want to say to USA thank you so much for gave us rq-170 and a scan eagle and Shadow drones
    free of charge😆😆😆

    • @alaskaeric1038
      @alaskaeric1038 5 років тому +8

      You're welcome. As a bonus, US will also provide you with some Tomohawk missiles. But you have to catch them all before they destroy your 3rd world military.

    • @mihaiilie8808
      @mihaiilie8808 3 роки тому

      @@alaskaeric1038 tomahawk is junk ,V1 technology that even a 15 years old can replicate.

    • @alaskaeric1038
      @alaskaeric1038 3 роки тому +1

      @@mihaiilie8808 Haha. About 20 of those outdated tomahawks would destroy all the Iranian sport fishing boats they refer to as a "Navy". They would only have plastic kayaks left. 🤣🤣

    • @mihaiilie8808
      @mihaiilie8808 3 роки тому +1

      @@alaskaeric1038 Iran has V2 rochets.Your lucky that they are such a peacefull nation and they didnt build nukes ,or else you would have another target sign on your country.
      As an european il put my bet on Iran in case you decide to go to war with them.

    • @Milossinchubure
      @Milossinchubure 3 роки тому

      @@mihaiilie8808 As a citizen of ex USAF target country I wouldn't bet on Iran with lot of cash.

  • @gardentools2553
    @gardentools2553 3 роки тому

    Hopefully this cG never has to be changed due to equipment update for that would be a nightmare ...that would really be stupid if you had to change some of the balance points .a flying language fly like s*** with the wrong balance lighter pilot 35 years

  • @doodleydoo
    @doodleydoo 3 роки тому

    Picture quality is poorly.

  • @mypolopony
    @mypolopony 4 роки тому

    08:03 "Gotcha bitch!"

  • @The.6.BachaParty_Official
    @The.6.BachaParty_Official 2 роки тому

    U will take an upgradef version from taliban very soon

  • @nellaeneguesamoht5223
    @nellaeneguesamoht5223 4 роки тому

    What a nice toy, but it's a damn shame you have to enlist to play with one.

  • @jmpompey1
    @jmpompey1 2 роки тому

    I can't see these being much use to the Taliban, but I wonder if Boeing can brick these remotely?

  • @suzar-pf1ov
    @suzar-pf1ov 14 днів тому

    😂that is landing or fishing 🎣

  • @ansariflightplan5814
    @ansariflightplan5814 8 років тому

    how that plane can be catch by rope? magnet?

  • @joykhan8174
    @joykhan8174 2 роки тому +1

    Now talibaan got some of them

  • @Ainkjabrig
    @Ainkjabrig 4 роки тому

    Ini drone yg mau di beli Indonesia..?

  • @ShoaibKhan-dy1xx
    @ShoaibKhan-dy1xx 2 роки тому +4

    and now this drone is in the hands of Afghan Talibans 😂😂😂😂

    • @amalsooraj4256
      @amalsooraj4256 2 роки тому

      They probably r watching this right now.

    • @ShoaibKhan-dy1xx
      @ShoaibKhan-dy1xx 2 роки тому +2

      @@amalsooraj4256 no they are watching how talibans captured Mi14 indian helicopter 😜😭😂😂😂

    • @amalsooraj4256
      @amalsooraj4256 2 роки тому

      @@ShoaibKhan-dy1xx Its Mi35 not Mi14 🤭.
      Also why wud they watch themselves capture the helo 🤔.
      Janab apka Shaab Adal badal ga rahe h 😂

    • @ShoaibKhan-dy1xx
      @ShoaibKhan-dy1xx 2 роки тому

      @@amalsooraj4256 hmary to shab adal badal ja rahy hain pr ap k to kbhi mig21 to kbhi heli adal nadal ja rahy hain 😂😂😂

    • @amalsooraj4256
      @amalsooraj4256 2 роки тому

      @@ShoaibKhan-dy1xx Haan bhai ab😏 itna saare aircrafts liya h, ab usma sa 2-3 giraye nhi toh mazaa kaha h, Gareeb desh thodi h Jo naye aircrafts na karid sake. 🤭😁

  • @cptozzy9775
    @cptozzy9775 3 роки тому

    whyyyy does it cost 3 million ????????????? I'm pretty sure someone can just jerry rig a thousand dollar one that has similar capabilities .

    • @jmpompey1
      @jmpompey1 2 роки тому

      The $3million is the cost of the entire system, so 4 drones, a ground control station, the launch system and the recovery system.

  • @wyleaziz5050
    @wyleaziz5050 5 років тому

    Did anyone notice the annoying fly buzzing sound, can’t they shoot it down with this drone !

  • @HiAdrian
    @HiAdrian 10 років тому

    8:05 Hehe, ok!

  • @JustRandomThings
    @JustRandomThings 2 роки тому

    I hope the Afghan Taliban doesn't see this video. Cause they have just got Scan eagles left behind by ANA

  • @jonahhekmatyar
    @jonahhekmatyar 5 років тому

    Scaneagle > shadow

  • @captmatt5650
    @captmatt5650 2 роки тому

    Oh great I’m sure the Taliban is excited to acquire these from Afghanistan

  • @aaron8862006
    @aaron8862006 10 років тому +2

    People calling this expensive or overkill really need some perspective.

  • @conradofmc_ny6706
    @conradofmc_ny6706 4 роки тому

    What the fuck was that duck tape landing? Millions of dollars wasted to that?? 😳

  • @zekezero12345
    @zekezero12345 10 років тому +1

    Nah, my Bixler 2 with APM 2.5 is waaay better... ;)

  • @AZ-rm6mm
    @AZ-rm6mm 8 років тому

    whats so special about it to cost millions i dont get it..why it cost millions?
    micro uavs are better for job and this thing can be seen easily...

  • @blakespower
    @blakespower 2 роки тому

    the Taliban has this now thanks for instructional video

  • @TheByrdHouse
    @TheByrdHouse 2 роки тому

    Great now the Taliban know how to operate them.