U.S. vs. China: The Design and Technology Behind Military Drones | WSJ

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 лис 2021
  • China is expanding its military arsenal with new drones, including stealth versions and those that can swarm and drop bombs.
    WSJ compares the tech and design of these drones with their U.S. counterparts to see how Beijing is equipping its military for possible future conflict.
    Photo composite: Sharon Shi
    U.S. vs. China
    This original video series explores the rivalry between the two superpowers’ competing efforts to develop the technologies that are reshaping our world.
    More from the Wall Street Journal:
    Visit WSJ.com: www.wsj.com
    Visit the WSJ Video Center: wsj.com/video
    On Facebook: / videos
    On Twitter: / wsj
    On Snapchat: on.wsj.com/2ratjSM
    #USChina #Drones #WSJ

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,4 тис.

  • @collins1972
    @collins1972 2 роки тому +1207

    Almost every American military industrial complex organizations describes themselves as non-profit organization

    • @tophatv2902
      @tophatv2902 2 роки тому +15

      no lol

    • @victorli7737
      @victorli7737 2 роки тому +110

      @@tophatv2902 Yes, these "experts" receives fundings from DoD. Nice of them to throw that info in there tho

    • @dtango8345
      @dtango8345 2 роки тому +40

      Their just layer of protection for Cia to network a web for adjectives

    • @CHL41993
      @CHL41993 2 роки тому +25

      when a company just pay its CEO billions each year and leave nothing on the book, that company is non-profit. just like some mega churches.

    • @godzillamothra5983
      @godzillamothra5983 2 роки тому +19

      American think thanks will also do the thinking for you so that you don't have to think anymore, convenient huh? The beauty of it, is that you don't even have to pay the think thank, the American military industrial complex and corporations take care of the bills for you, lovely huh

  • @dickiewongtk
    @dickiewongtk 2 роки тому +309

    I love how the media is trying the best to drum up the Chinese “threat” while the experts are trying their best to downplay Chinese technology advancement.

    • @tankart3645
      @tankart3645 2 роки тому +27

      (You mean copy off stuff, that actully work worse.)
      By rallying up threat, the Military Industrial Complex can get more money, by getting more money for the Military itself.

    • @dddddh1
      @dddddh1 2 роки тому +1

      ua-cam.com/video/M-M5KqYC__k/v-deo.html
      You seem wide awake.

    • @iamsorryforbeingrudebefore1626
      @iamsorryforbeingrudebefore1626 2 роки тому +59

      @@tankart3645 congrats, you are now a certified MSM graduate.

    • @tankart3645
      @tankart3645 2 роки тому +4

      @@iamsorryforbeingrudebefore1626 MSM?, which MSM, you know how little that narrows the thing down?

    • @zenastronomy
      @zenastronomy 2 роки тому +4

      doublethink.
      1984 Orwellian tactic

  • @clovertechdev4243
    @clovertechdev4243 2 роки тому +100

    China doesn’t need to fly to Hawai’i, only to defend China sovereignty.

  • @MGZetta
    @MGZetta 2 роки тому +363

    If a country's military equipment and technology are not used in combat, it is not a drag, it's a compliment.

    • @wanglaugh9932
      @wanglaugh9932 2 роки тому +16

      You found the real information conveyed by this video.

    • @gallaxian
      @gallaxian 2 роки тому +28

      The report says that China is gathering data about 200 drones it has sold to 16 countries. I’m sure China has also employed them in its border skirmishes with India.

    • @yungunit8299
      @yungunit8299 2 роки тому +37

      @@gallaxian "Report says" if its written in English, Cannot be trusted. 99% chance its fake news.

    • @hotchi1566
      @hotchi1566 2 роки тому +18

      For a good country, military equipment is used to avoid war. For a bad country, military equipment is used to make war.

    • @spaceisalie5451
      @spaceisalie5451 2 роки тому +2

      Your right. No country should have ever stepped up and fought the nazis.

  • @danwelterweight4137
    @danwelterweight4137 2 роки тому +177

    99% of the Chinese military is within the Chinese border.
    The US had over 800 military bases around the world with hundreds of thousands of soldiers outside it's territory, 300 of those bases encircling China.

    • @mashr4733
      @mashr4733 2 роки тому +2

      Thank you, Wikipedia

    • @troy4298
      @troy4298 2 роки тому +11

      The PLA doesnt even have any experience any more, and the last time their troops were deployed was in tiananmen square 1989

    • @hagerawitube2449
      @hagerawitube2449 2 роки тому +3

      Yet , it is the US who is worryed by Chinees Aggression ! like WTH ?

    • @troy4298
      @troy4298 2 роки тому +7

      @@hagerawitube2449 because the chinese are the ones being agressive duh

    • @cheeseninja1115
      @cheeseninja1115 2 роки тому +2

      @@hagerawitube2449 the US places bases in nations that ask for them to do so, the Chinese don't like the protection the US gives to its adversaries or lesser regional powers and has been pushing back. China is the aggressor as they are forcefully expanding while the US uses diplomacy and fear of Chinas aggression to gain even more military leverage in the region without threatening anyone out side of china *only* when China is agressive.

  • @wogelson
    @wogelson 2 роки тому +149

    0:54 oh yes the best stealth drone, the B-2

    • @hwg5039
      @hwg5039 2 роки тому +39

      WSJ just wants to imply that the Chinese drone copied the American design. However, the only similar thing between a reconnaissance drone and a long-range bomber is the flying wing configuration.

    • @oakoakoak2219
      @oakoakoak2219 2 роки тому +55

      @@hwg5039 The comparison fail there. To say any aircraft with a flying wing configuration is a copy of US bomber is extremely narcissistic.

    • @elvita13282
      @elvita13282 2 роки тому +5

      It reminds me the Serb's air-defence IYWM🤡🇲🇾

    • @moutainchad2360
      @moutainchad2360 2 роки тому +9

      Yo so what do u expect the design to of a drone designed with the exact objective and capacities to appear like aesthetically, a bus with wings?

    • @Dwg256
      @Dwg256 2 роки тому +1

      646

  • @justinkase5260
    @justinkase5260 2 роки тому +74

    The US has lots of experience. That’s not something you should be proud of.

    • @theamazingyoutubewatchergu6838
      @theamazingyoutubewatchergu6838 2 роки тому +4

      China has experience too if you count the oppression of its own population by the ruling CCP.

    • @moxq2to
      @moxq2to 2 роки тому

      @@theamazingyoutubewatchergu6838 So you mean by bombing others makes USA a better nation than China? What I see is both of them are the bullies in the school.

    • @DATBOYBEN
      @DATBOYBEN 2 роки тому +4

      China committing genocide isn't something you should be proud of.

    • @theamazingyoutubewatchergu6838
      @theamazingyoutubewatchergu6838 2 роки тому +5

      @@DATBOYBEN the fact so many people in the US are willing to look the other way on this because of money is disgusting.

    • @justinkase5260
      @justinkase5260 2 роки тому +1

      @@theamazingyoutubewatchergu6838 The same can be said about US bombs in other countries.

  • @chenzhang9715
    @chenzhang9715 2 роки тому +101

    There are only a handful of people in the comment area who have been to China, but they seem to know China very well😄

    • @Minchya
      @Minchya Рік тому

      Do you need to take heroin to know that it is bad ???

    • @user-wg9zq1ee8f
      @user-wg9zq1ee8f Рік тому

      I'm Chinese, and China's weapons are toys and plagiarism, and there is no deterrent.

    • @Minchya
      @Minchya Рік тому +2

      @@user-wg9zq1ee8f Interesting, do you have personal knowledge ? I watched a program recently that was about poor Chinese weapons sales, it seems that even though the price is good not many buyers are interested.

    • @ericwong4213
      @ericwong4213 Рік тому

      @@Minchya which program? the one from CNN? The program that has access to top of the top Chinese secret in weapon sales? Everyone can make news out of fart. Just for your update, as per today's news, The Australian Strategic Policy Institute found China leading and dominate 37/44 critical future technology, majority in military tech, quantum tech, robotic, AI, while the other 7 is quickly catching up with US. The Hypersonic missile launched by China circled the World, shocking US with Pentagon scientists claimed Chinese nuclear capable missile defies physics. Back in Korea war, due to huge gap of military technology dominance on US side, Chinese casualty was 50 to 1 against US. Now with tech far dominance by China, the casualty will be 20:1 against US. Not to mention Chinese military personels 2x compared to US and all US allies combined (incl EU, Japan, S Korea). Pentagon from time to time warned the coming decade, the Chinese military simply unchallengable.

    • @Minchya
      @Minchya Рік тому

      @@ericwong4213 You display the biggest weakness that all modern Chinese seem to suffer from , HUBRIS

  • @Rajeevinsane
    @Rajeevinsane 2 роки тому +52

    To know how great they are, there is a good example. DJI .

  • @birdangry5007
    @birdangry5007 2 роки тому +349

    For industrial countries such as China and the United States, simply comparing military spending is meaningless because their domestic purchasing power is different.

    • @flabber55tv83
      @flabber55tv83 2 роки тому +3

      But high quality

    • @birdangry5007
      @birdangry5007 2 роки тому +186

      @@flabber55tv83 Yes, quality is important.
      Americans with high-quality weapons spent $2.231 trillion in Afghanistan, fought for more than 10 years, and did not eliminate the backward Taliban. On the contrary, they finally let the Taliban establish a government. Can you tell me why?I hope you can think independently.
      At the same time, people are more important. This is the reason why China was able to drive the Americans into the sea in the 1950 Korean War when its weapons lagged far behind the United States.
      As a Chinese, it is fair to say that the United States is leading in many traditional military fields (such as military engines). But the gap is already small. We can see these gaps and narrow them.
      On the contrary, China has advantages in some emerging fields (such as hypersonic weapons, space shuttle aircraft, etc.).
      The most important thing is that time is on China's side.

    • @tis_ace
      @tis_ace 2 роки тому +26

      @@birdangry5007 i can agree with most of what u said except for the shuttle part, us still operates the x 37 and has extensive knowledge from the space shuttle program, so givi g the advantage to china in that field just doesnt sit well with me

    • @flabber55tv83
      @flabber55tv83 2 роки тому +3

      And your saying china's drive the US?? In the ocean Big NO
      The UN was there to defend Korean border and guess what?? No one can go through in that front line and you saying time is now china's side sryly
      Did you think your country is unstoppable because you have hypersonic missile? And you think UN and NATO can stand a chance.?

    • @birdangry5007
      @birdangry5007 2 роки тому +21

      @@tis_ace X 37 is not the same model as China's space shuttle. X 37 is a space shuttle that takes off vertically by rocket power. It glides and lands horizontally without power in the atmosphere. An aerospace plane can take off horizontally into space, and then land on the runway on its own power like an aircraft from space. The power system of the two is not a difficulty at all. For example, skyion, which uses a knife engine in Britain, is a combined power. Not to mention the separation technology of aircraft at hypersonic speed (Mach 25).

  • @longlonglo3501
    @longlonglo3501 2 роки тому +37

    How arrogant and funny to talk about China threat when us and UK aircraft carriers are on China's doorstep...

    • @louiswu6300
      @louiswu6300 2 роки тому

      US: 800 military bases out door.
      China : 1 military base out door.
      and China wanna build a new one for trade route.
      US: China is a threat.

    • @altego016
      @altego016 2 роки тому

      It's arrogant and funny to talk about china threat when china is the one on other countries doorstep in the first place, like the Scarborough Shoal

    • @fuckdick3685
      @fuckdick3685 Рік тому

      @@altego016 China is embarrassing itself

    • @user-fy3dw4dk9o
      @user-fy3dw4dk9o Рік тому

      2016 South China Sea is a good memory, and you can only pretend in the end.

  • @-Teca-
    @-Teca- 2 роки тому +83

    Just look at how were reaching the military tech level of Black Ops 2 :D

  • @ibrahimn22
    @ibrahimn22 2 роки тому +49

    When you money is not backed by gold but military power .
    Any other countries which are out of military reach will be cause for concern.
    China just wants to build enough military power to make any country think twice before they attack.
    China tec is getting better all the time and they are building up a nice group of countries to become allied with.

    • @georgecarlin2097
      @georgecarlin2097 2 роки тому +5

      Not really. Iran is the only ally with any military projection capability. Maybe NK. Russia wouldnt likely have their back in an all out ww3 scenario but if they did recent events have displayed their weakness as well.
      Compare with US alliances which has NATO (Germany France UK etc.), Australia new Zealand Vietnam south Korea Japan Taiwan India etc.

    • @ibrahimn22
      @ibrahimn22 2 роки тому

      @@georgecarlin2097
      Like is said the aim of the east is not to win ww3 but to prevent it from happening by making the cost too heigh
      For the western alliance.
      West is not defensive at all but a aggressive military economic alliance.

    • @georgecarlin2097
      @georgecarlin2097 2 роки тому +2

      @@ibrahimn22 NATO is defensive only. Only the us had capabilities to project military capabilities over wide areas.

    • @DZ477
      @DZ477 2 роки тому

      "China just wants to build enough military power to make any country think twice before they attack."
      This is just an echo of China's state-run propaganda message, a look at Taiwan would yield a clearer picture.

    • @ibrahimn22
      @ibrahimn22 2 роки тому +9

      @@DZ477
      Taiwan is part of China when the UK start accepting military supplies by China to Scotland or Northern Ireland
      Even the Falkland islands then I would say you have a point .
      I don't see China supply weapons to catatonia in Spain.
      When will the west understand
      Like Russia China is willing to pay a higher price to keep Taiwan allied or natural just like Ukraine.
      West is all talk and postures they will not step in on Ukraine and same will happen to Taiwan.

  • @alvirarahman2690
    @alvirarahman2690 2 роки тому +146

    A valiant effort to highlight the use of drone technology in wars but NOT mentioning the most coveted of the Drone battle in mankind history: the Nagorno Karabakh war (2020)

    • @saiofficial437
      @saiofficial437 2 роки тому +33

      Turkish Baytaktar TB2 did a main role in that war

    • @YMe-hp7hi
      @YMe-hp7hi 2 роки тому +16

      Tb2 is indeed battle proven

    • @TheMrgoodmanners
      @TheMrgoodmanners 2 роки тому +4

      lol turkey is really struggling getting parts for its drones nowadays, 90% of its parts are from europe and canada

    • @ismailHossain-ln9ln
      @ismailHossain-ln9ln 2 роки тому +16

      @@TheMrgoodmanners even now Canadaian company are crying cause they can't export their uav cameras. Now Türkei manufacturers and export this parts also.

    • @TheMrgoodmanners
      @TheMrgoodmanners 2 роки тому +2

      @@ismailHossain-ln9ln lol they are certainly not crying. The only one that is is turkey. L3 has far bigger customers than turkey. Lets see what happens when the EU blocks ukraine from selling its engine parts to turkey

  • @joshieepophide-hide3322
    @joshieepophide-hide3322 2 роки тому +119

    Swarm drones will be very effective to missile defense systems. It needs lots of missiles to destroy a group of swarm drones while it only need 1 drone to disrupt or destroy enemy missile defense installations that cost 1000x more than the swarm drones.

    • @saviobiogen9914
      @saviobiogen9914 2 роки тому +14

      Yea, but those small drones are easier to be jamed, and are leas capable against radio electronic weapons and such measures.

    • @mdhasmatalimondal1216
      @mdhasmatalimondal1216 2 роки тому +15

      A powerful EMP and your swarm is grounded .

    • @user-hj8mz3hp3s
      @user-hj8mz3hp3s 2 роки тому +2

      And you fire c ram cannon and turno dose drones into junk

    • @sevrent2811
      @sevrent2811 2 роки тому +5

      not really, guns that fire clouds of small projectiles can easily shoot down drone swarms. Rheinmetall already made one

    • @user-hj8mz3hp3s
      @user-hj8mz3hp3s 2 роки тому +2

      @@sevrent2811 i mentioned it above you.Tungsten submunition is the solution to swarm drone probpem

  • @maxscania
    @maxscania 2 роки тому +13

    1:37 decrease the risk of human casualties, well it depends which human.

  • @marvinfok65
    @marvinfok65 2 роки тому +40

    Chinese drones had been used in real combat in Libya. China sold their drones to UAE who send them to Libya fighting the opposite forces which deployed Turkey's Bayraktar TB2 drones.

    • @hisongling3940
      @hisongling3940 Рік тому

      结果是被敌对势力痛扁吗?

    • @shuipingmo5114
      @shuipingmo5114 Рік тому

      @@hisongling3940 断脊之犬别无脑bb,哈士奇的无人机被机场端窝了,土耳其气不过直接派有人战斗机找场子了

    • @ksc7957
      @ksc7957 Рік тому +5

      @@hisongling3940 不,BBC的報導是中國無人機及土耳其無人機直接交戰, 土耳其無人機戰敗後 土耳其出動戰艦發射導彈擊落中國無人機

    • @turishoferi1473
      @turishoferi1473 Рік тому +3

      ​@@ksc7957 😂😂😂where did you read them at chinese state television? Turkish drone technology is far superior than chinese. Today there are 3 countries with the highest drone technology. Usa turkey and israel

    • @user-fd1ix3mv4x
      @user-fd1ix3mv4x Рік тому

      @@turishoferi1473 你疯了 中国无人机敢说第二 没有任何国家敢说第一 你去问你的美国爸爸吧!看他承不承认

  • @werw6808
    @werw6808 2 роки тому +29

    DJI left the chat 😂

    • @weichenli2598
      @weichenli2598 Рік тому

      DJI: I'm just an ordinary technology company that makes civilian drones, so stop throwing grenades with drones.😂

  • @DavidF3
    @DavidF3 2 роки тому +9

    I don't know why they a re comparing the GJ-11 to the B2 spirit. A much better comparison is the american RQ-170.

  • @jasonyau326
    @jasonyau326 2 роки тому +49

    And this is why China actually created and deployed Beidou, their version of GPS 🤔😉🤨

  • @dreykim
    @dreykim 2 роки тому +19

    Military version of: you can copy my homework, just don't make it obvious

  • @stanoh1000
    @stanoh1000 2 роки тому +112

    Why can't we have the Chinese themselves talk about their drones?? And products??

    • @AAA-pf5bh
      @AAA-pf5bh 2 роки тому +13

      The defence ministry didn’t respond to a request for comment 5:28

    • @donchen4906
      @donchen4906 2 роки тому +53

      @iͥvͮaͣrͬoͦ Did good media make your country stronger?

    • @Ilovecruise
      @Ilovecruise 2 роки тому +11

      @@donchen4906 if the media are not bias and objective, then yes

    • @donchen4906
      @donchen4906 2 роки тому +16

      @@Ilovecruise If? So it is not then.
      Don't put your hope on if, it is just an assumption that far from being reality

    • @k.k.c8670
      @k.k.c8670 2 роки тому +26

      @iͥvͮaͣrͬoͦ the aim of US public relations in regard to this is to make the military industrial complex look good... So that the US can sell more weapons and stuff. It is a major American export industry. China, not so much. It does export some weapons but it's clearly not as aggressive in that regard.

  • @alparslankorkmaz2964
    @alparslankorkmaz2964 2 роки тому +2

    Nice video.

  • @afshanmanikpethe5469
    @afshanmanikpethe5469 Рік тому

    Insane n valuable information

  • @elements1168
    @elements1168 2 роки тому +57

    A malfunctioned fully automated swarm is really dangerous

    • @tonysu8860
      @tonysu8860 2 роки тому +1

      Not necessarily. Find a quadcopter nano quadcopter competition in your area aometime and have a bunch of them fly their quadcopters into you.
      And maybe take control of one yourself. You'll find that "malfunctioning" or even poorly functioning quadcopters are more an amusement than any threat to your physical well being.

    • @smiley4669
      @smiley4669 2 роки тому +5

      @@tonysu8860 Okay "Tony Su"

    • @dznuts123
      @dznuts123 2 роки тому +1

      Skynet 1.0? Sounds great

    • @Ahoooooooo
      @Ahoooooooo 2 роки тому

      Once the swarm has reached enemies, it their problem how dangerous they are 🤐

    • @ChandranPrema123
      @ChandranPrema123 Рік тому

      Enemy Swarm in your AO

  • @KejriwalBhakt
    @KejriwalBhakt 2 роки тому +6

    The best drones are build by DJI in China and not the Chinese military.

    • @politicalreal7813
      @politicalreal7813 2 роки тому

      False

    • @KejriwalBhakt
      @KejriwalBhakt 2 роки тому

      @@politicalreal7813 And the truth is?

    • @joyzhou1604
      @joyzhou1604 2 роки тому +1

      Have you been to a show called: before? My best friend saw Shen Yun before pandemic, she told me this was
      the first time she was moved to tears in a stage live show, So finally, I went to see Shen Yun with my whole family two months
      ago, I cried also---, What a great show! Actually I hadn’t believed a dance show would touch her heart so deeply until I watched
      it in real: brave, hope, warm, encouragement, energy, responsibility---, it’s hard to describe how I benefit from this two-hour show,
      but one thing I am sure is I won’t be beaten down no matter how difficult in the future life, I will never give up!

  • @LotteryPower
    @LotteryPower 2 роки тому +18

    30 years from now when bioweapon and ai is greatly improved and natural resource is in crisis, damage from war can be devastating

    • @Pfyzer
      @Pfyzer 2 роки тому

      if everyone played by the rule, then bioweapons wouldnt be an issue[HOPEFULLY].... automated killings machines however, that's another story..... cuz blackhat hackers will see this as an amazing once in a life time hunt

  • @rupturedtortoise.1542
    @rupturedtortoise.1542 2 роки тому +60

    Okay this is terrible research by WSJ. They said at the end that we don't have a drone in the US arsenal that is the flying wing design. In fact, we have multiple. The RQ-170, RQ-180, X-47B and whatever other classified drones. These have been in service or in active testing for years now. If you're gonna make videos about the U.S. Military get real experts.

    • @yewsingooi9573
      @yewsingooi9573 2 роки тому +12

      Even DJI supply drone for US military. US have drones? Mehh

    • @misterniceguy7997
      @misterniceguy7997 2 роки тому +16

      @@yewsingooi9573 US have many Hightech Drones that China Copy it

    • @misterniceguy7997
      @misterniceguy7997 2 роки тому +9

      @@yewsingooi9573 China dont have own Design hahaha... China always Copying US Technology., look at the US and the Chinese Drones its the same., anyway the B-21 Stealth Bomber is coming and 6th Generation Unmanned Fighter Jets also coming., there is 2 Types of US 6th Generation Unmanned Stealth Fighter Jets from the US., lets see what can do the Chinese Copycat Drones., but for the US that is an Old Drones (MQ 9 Reaper)

    • @shengchen4553
      @shengchen4553 2 роки тому +24

      @@misterniceguy7997 hightech and copy. Lolllllll. Do u mean USA High tech is so easy to copy. Or ONLY China is able to COPY USA HIGH TECH. Or USA is so USELESS to protect its HIGH-tech. Or China is too powerful to steal USA High tech from USA.
      We also deployed our own hypersonic missile. Same as Russia. That must be another steal….. Wait, The USA is still struggling testing and failed. OK, China steal it from the future. That make sense.

    • @tophatv2902
      @tophatv2902 2 роки тому +5

      @@shengchen4553 You are coping hard. you could even make your own humvee without making a copy lol.

  • @steevesdd
    @steevesdd 2 роки тому +239

    Drone tech is disruptive. The recent conflict near Turkey demonstrated the disruption. The cost effectiveness , in procurement, maintenance, training, deployment and logistics mean that all conflicts going forward will be dominated by drone tech. For aircraft , removing the limitations of the pilot greatly increases the capabilities of a platform. A lot of weight, space and air craft specifications go into keeping the human alive. The same is true for submarines. Flying drones off ships reduces the need for huge flight decks and the number of personal to service aircraft. Deploying ships with 20 to 30 attack drones, could see fast attack carriers the size of frigates or no carrier ships and drones working from land bases that can be setup in hours.

    • @WellBattle6
      @WellBattle6 2 роки тому +16

      There hasn’t been a conflict where the opposing forces have had anti-drone jamming technology yet, so we still don’t know whether they would be prevalent in contested airspace in a high intensity conflict yet.

    • @ChrischanCPUGoddess
      @ChrischanCPUGoddess 2 роки тому +5

      You don’t need ships to deploy these drones. They can launch from a soccer field anywhere in the world. Some are VTAL. When we looked at the numbers, shadow AVs alone can be anywhere in the world in 2 hours. Based off placement and handoff locations

    • @_OscarIvan
      @_OscarIvan 2 роки тому

      @Eswe Agreed

    • @georgiebrowntown7316
      @georgiebrowntown7316 2 роки тому

      @Sin ZX you must be chinese. Because noone else really sees it that way. Besides china... and actions speak louder than words. That all sounds good and looks good on paper

    • @rfcdgaf
      @rfcdgaf 2 роки тому

      @Eswe The leek is a vegetable, a cultivar of Allium ampeloprasum, the broadleaf wild leek. The edible part of the plant is a bundle of leaf sheaths that is

  • @saptarsimondal7653
    @saptarsimondal7653 2 роки тому +9

    The military-industrial complex now need more money! Lol :P

  • @reallyhappenings5597
    @reallyhappenings5597 2 роки тому

    Cross naval CIWS with the M134. Mount a half-dozen guns linearly on towable platforms. 360-degree low-cost low-weight swarm defense. Or just use lasers.

  • @fouly1981
    @fouly1981 2 роки тому +1

    Just on the road.

  • @bambamkitring6666
    @bambamkitring6666 2 роки тому +16

    Interesting to see Western and Eastern competition.

  • @two02ful
    @two02ful 2 роки тому +13

    America can produces 100 drone monthly and China produces 1,000 drones of the same kind in a month on a normal production days. On the same time China are producing a wide variety of drones for different application.

    • @user-wg9zq1ee8f
      @user-wg9zq1ee8f Рік тому

      I'm Chinese, and China's weapons are toys and plagiarism, and there is no deterrent.

    • @patatebanine4278
      @patatebanine4278 Рік тому

      Source of what you say. Where you find that USA (not America btw) produces 100 drone monthly and China 1000?

  • @michellemacasaol573
    @michellemacasaol573 2 роки тому +2

    Can area denial using directed energy stop drone swarm tactic? any opinion please

  • @alpha_centaurus5396
    @alpha_centaurus5396 Рік тому

    I really like love 😍 this channel

  • @JorgeHernandez-gq6yy
    @JorgeHernandez-gq6yy 2 роки тому +61

    I’m assuming a big factor is that here in the states we contract companies and China does not?

    • @dracoii1147
      @dracoii1147 2 роки тому +8

      They aren’t allowed to give info to other countries but China usually hacks in

    • @proger1960
      @proger1960 2 роки тому +8

      @@dracoii1147
      Umm well you see they sometimes do secretly, or China uses an American ally like Israel and bribe them to take critical American tech away.

    • @emanuelbabayagaortiz7333
      @emanuelbabayagaortiz7333 2 роки тому

      @@proger1960 it’s probably old military techs or former chief operators during manufacturing. After their contract they’ll run off and sell secrets. I’ve looked at job requirements to work for big defense industries. They basically ask for someone who is either a college study prodigy or some science teacher with a very fun hobby and budget. Someone who so versed from python to Java, c+. Electronics maintain eye and fluid mechanics degrees. 10+ in professional portfolios. Be formerly a tss/secret level holder… I still can’t figure out if they are offering a management position because the pay is like 100-1200k a year. You’re better off with all that experience running for President like Putin. But chances are that’s where the actual classwardare start between private citizens businessmen and those black suits chief security officers of the nsa/cia bakc operations command. There’s no over the net hack, you can’t send a file to overload someone’s network… you’d first have to be there, like opening a email… but not clicking the link or downloading the attachment first…. Think about this. Look at border patrol agent jobs or atf agent jobs. Those jobs you can’t sign up for, you’d have to work hard and hope they have a interest in your department. Even then you can still seem too greedy to want to help Uncle Sam. There’s a article that said the cia needs to stop hunting Chinese spies in academia. But China were the first to test quantum satellites in space and the US were studying photonics copying. Which I thought was impossible since you can take a element and copy it. Specially if it’s used to send a message on a quantum level. The things that keep me up at night….

    • @proger1960
      @proger1960 2 роки тому +2

      @@emanuelbabayagaortiz7333
      Honestly true , I mean both China and America do work together on their evil deeds however the media shows them against one another.

    • @emanuelbabayagaortiz7333
      @emanuelbabayagaortiz7333 2 роки тому +1

      @@proger1960 google Alexandra Forsythe. She’s this cute red head who’s like 20 years old that got summer camp jobs are Nasa/Raytheon. She’s now a lead engineer at Intel. America is headed to the public side of technology just as China is moving to the military side of this international theater. We can better start learning mandarin

  • @wanglaugh9932
    @wanglaugh9932 2 роки тому +59

    You may find some truth from this video.
    US: "Today, it flies a fleet of thousands of drones that are operated in countries including Iraq, Pakistan and Afganistan."
    China: "Chinese military spending is lower than the US. Chinese drones don't have as much battlefield experiences as the America-Made ones. Chinese military hasn't used their drones in a real warfare."

    • @dznuts123
      @dznuts123 2 роки тому +45

      yet people ignore the real aggressor, which is the us

    • @rashidaquil5284
      @rashidaquil5284 2 роки тому +8

      Why do unnecessary killing including native Americans... it is unjust and murder

    • @tonysu8860
      @tonysu8860 2 роки тому +3

      Actually, China itself isn't known to have successfully used drones in warfare.
      A number of customer countries have tried to or actually flown drones, the most successful seem to be the ones that are very unsophisticated and tiny, little more than what you can buy form DJI. The military drones China has tried to sell so far have had major reliability problems, almost can't even successfully fly once and perform a mission of any type.

    • @xinyiquan666
      @xinyiquan666 2 роки тому +14

      stop BS, chinese drones have been entensively used in middle east and africa warfare since 2000s, ignorent, they were sold in tens of thousands to those countries such as syria and iraq and saqid arab and egypt and lybia, they have been intensively used in wars espeically in syria war, and have highest success rate in warfare, they shot down lots of drones and other targets from USA and turkey, go search videos on youtube ,chinese drones used in middle east, US made drones are gabages...

    • @xinyiquan666
      @xinyiquan666 2 роки тому +5

      @@tonysu8860 stop BS and making up stories, , Chinese drones is largest and most succcessful in world, chinese drones are sold in highest numbers in world, US drone has very few exports and no one wants to buy US drone, it is expensive and very unreliable, thats why US can not have any companies like chinese DJI that is world most advanced drone company and largest sellor of drones, US can not even make good civil drones , let alone military drones, US drones never had any successful mission and all crashed or shot down by countris such as iran or syria, it is junk, thats why china is NO1 drone seller both military and civil products.

  • @zhli4238
    @zhli4238 2 роки тому +44

    WSJ is trying to help the Pentagon getting more budget. It does need public helps on politics. China itself is helping too, holding large amount of US government debt, providing strategic material such as rare earth …

    • @steevesdd
      @steevesdd 2 роки тому +12

      US narrative making China the enemy while also being their supply chain seems absurd. Spend money to protect your supply chain from China when China is your supply.

    • @ismailHossain-ln9ln
      @ismailHossain-ln9ln 2 роки тому +2

      right

    • @ikGREENY
      @ikGREENY 2 роки тому

      @@steevesdd Whatever we export to or import from China we make huge profit on, which means a lot more money for our military than them. We already have this tech developed but aren’t worried about perception of power like the beta male communist Chinese govt so we don’t tell all our secrets to the media and show all them in demonstrations. Quit looking at the surface level info you receive as the full picture.. cuz in reality you just sound dumb.

    • @benganchan1420
      @benganchan1420 2 роки тому +3

      @@ikGREENY america’s debt trap as of 6 December 2021 is $28,000,000,000,000 with a huge outlay going into military spending .
      Blame successive incoming american governments for the past 2 decades . Politicians divide a people according to their agendas, and when the votes are counted , it results in a hung democracy , which is an unworkable government. Happened /happening in america , canada, germany ,india, malaysia ….

  • @Dimaz42
    @Dimaz42 2 роки тому +96

    China could probably design better military tech if they have similar military budget with the US

    • @VoidSpace9
      @VoidSpace9 2 роки тому +6

      We do have similar budget, but you just don't know it yet...

    • @twinsrock15
      @twinsrock15 2 роки тому +48

      Why does China need a bigger military budget when they just steal everything.

    • @nobody2874
      @nobody2874 2 роки тому +43

      @@twinsrock15 hahahahahha coming from the us aahahhahahahhaha
      You just made my day buddy

    • @joaopedroalbernaz
      @joaopedroalbernaz 2 роки тому +11

      @Dimaz You need to change "design" to "steal"

    • @Zov631
      @Zov631 2 роки тому +31

      @@twinsrock15 Do you really have any classified information to prove their “stealing” lol

  • @arlenn729
    @arlenn729 2 роки тому +5

    The author of this video sounds like an amateur on military equipment development process. “Reliability” is THE MOST IMPORTANT aspect for military equipments. It is well written in the requirement section of the document for every piece of equipment. Besides, we are still far from developing an AI that has self awareness so calm down.

  • @TheWizardGamez
    @TheWizardGamez 2 роки тому +17

    wasnt the US navy testing a delta(stealthish) drone, but eventually just chose a conventional wing drone for their refueling mission, and wasnt it supposed to have anti-sub capabilities?

    • @skyejamss
      @skyejamss 2 роки тому

      Mq-25?

    • @hoosteen1597
      @hoosteen1597 2 роки тому +5

      Yeah do you mean the rq180? That is a flying wing drone in development (or operational already). Idk why wsj chose to focus on like 2 Chinese drones when there are hundreds of new American drones in development rn but classified

    • @riz82k97
      @riz82k97 Рік тому

      @@hoosteen1597 yes it’s the RQ-170 and it’s been operational since at least 2011 when it was captured by the Iranian military which is prob whr China got their design for their flying wing drone from

  • @JC-ew9ze
    @JC-ew9ze 2 роки тому +15

    US has hundreds of models of UAVs, China has more than over 3000 models of UAVs. That is the fact based on the numbers!

    • @TacUltra10
      @TacUltra10 2 роки тому +2

      So having more MODELS makes a difference? Can you even name all 3000 different models? lol China drones is like ordering us drones off wish..lol They are literally cheap copies...lol

    • @tommymikey5367
      @tommymikey5367 2 роки тому +9

      @@TacUltra10 Who did the Dji drone copy? India or America?

    • @TacUltra10
      @TacUltra10 2 роки тому

      @@tommymikey5367 dji drones are not a predator drone or mq9 reaper.

    • @JC-ew9ze
      @JC-ew9ze 2 роки тому +4

      @@TacUltra10 you can go to wikipedia page of unmaned drone. It going to take you at least 10 minutes!

    • @TacUltra10
      @TacUltra10 2 роки тому +1

      @@JC-ew9ze I know but one country having thousands of different kinds is not a good thing. The logistics manufacture and training for thousands of different drones makes no sense. But if you look at countries drones after the US predator came out you notice how at least 10 different countries have the same shape and look of the predator drone.

  • @agc
    @agc 2 роки тому +66

    The point that most viewers need to take home after watching this clip can be found at 0:38 "China's military spending is lower than the US"

    • @N0_F1le
      @N0_F1le 2 роки тому +2

      @David Moore *laugh in a much more corrupted China Goverment*

    • @kavorka8855
      @kavorka8855 2 роки тому +6

      The figures are based on the official sources. The difference between a fascist system and a democracy, in the latter you cannot hide lies for long, whereas in the former, you can lie and even teach 1.4 billion people false history.

    • @FloofyMinari
      @FloofyMinari 2 роки тому +4

      Chinese Private defense contractors are more beholden to the PRC than American contractors. The U.S also has a lot more regulation, higher labor costs, etc etc.

    • @lvjinbin28
      @lvjinbin28 2 роки тому

      @@N0_F1le China will be always more than corrupted as long as lobbying is illegal.

    • @N0_F1le
      @N0_F1le 2 роки тому

      @David Moore let me tell you
      china goverment love to lie about their military spending
      just look at the navy and the air assets they have
      tell me that the spending they given are just incorrect
      and the china goverment is even more corrupted as the goverment eat most of the money before it even went to the intended purpose and even then the company from the goverment that is tasked to do thing, do it and too take money for the spending

  • @jonathans7089
    @jonathans7089 2 роки тому +24

    "Explosion of creativity" Right

    • @MyWickedSmile
      @MyWickedSmile 2 роки тому +10

      Keep thinking that we Chinese people are unimaginative drones who can’t innovate. We would love your whole military to underestimate ours as well.

    • @compassroses
      @compassroses 2 роки тому +9

      @@MyWickedSmile Nah, we KNOW that the Chinese steal other nations' technological advances, and then add tweaks.

    • @bright5801
      @bright5801 2 роки тому

      @@MyWickedSmile I believe that the Chinese people are very creative but they need to show it by coming up with different unique designs

    • @Dwg256
      @Dwg256 2 роки тому +1

      646

    • @erickariuki6842
      @erickariuki6842 2 роки тому

      Taliban!!!

  • @willengel2458
    @willengel2458 2 роки тому +8

    the female analyst sounded like a drone.

  • @jetblack6850
    @jetblack6850 2 роки тому +11

    The question should be how many woman and children have the US drone killed compare to China drones.

  • @straightblast569
    @straightblast569 2 роки тому

    All u need is a disrupt frequency n u can jam most drones

  • @TesserId
    @TesserId 2 роки тому +15

    So, some of these are going to be autonomous. Well, we know where that's heading.

  • @mohaztv8602
    @mohaztv8602 2 роки тому +9

    When you just look at this you can't help but think humans are very creative in making killing weapons

    • @futurecorpse7330
      @futurecorpse7330 2 роки тому

      Heard a quote one time don’t remember who said it but they said mice don’t build their own mouse traps

    • @leky1325
      @leky1325 2 роки тому

      A knife could could be use to cut food or to kill, depends who's wielding it.

  • @renatocea5298
    @renatocea5298 2 роки тому

    Ang pangontra diyan sa swarm drones pasabugin sa gitna o gamitan ng steel net na parang nanghuhuling ng lamok o gamitan ng magnetic gun para magdikit at sumabog

  • @newibas7166
    @newibas7166 2 роки тому +1

    I think an advancement in drone technology will lead to self flawn planes

  • @winterthekid
    @winterthekid 2 роки тому +9

    The lady talks about failures, like you know: killing an entire family of 10, including 7 children, in Kabul, August the 29 2021?

  • @michaelesq.atpcfii.9862
    @michaelesq.atpcfii.9862 2 роки тому +10

    Since when has "war" been about limiting human casualties?

  • @kerrykelly2119
    @kerrykelly2119 2 роки тому +2

    That's y z world is not steady because competition and fighting to become super power of z world which is a huge problem to z world

  • @ertugrulserdengecti5211
    @ertugrulserdengecti5211 Рік тому +1

    I think bayraktar tb2 is the best

  • @wollo6
    @wollo6 2 роки тому +6

    that academic lady sounded painfully spergy

  • @superduper1917
    @superduper1917 2 роки тому +7

    Show us how we use Space Command to shoot down satellites please!
    Also updates on the X-Wing and Tie-Fighters under development.
    Long Live The Military Industrial Complex
    Dapra is my Daddy ;-)

  • @tykki-
    @tykki- 2 роки тому

    how about signals that confuses enemies' technologies? none was said about that.

  • @ArneChristianRosenfeldt
    @ArneChristianRosenfeldt Рік тому

    I like the swept wings. Looks as fast as an English Electric Lightning. I think Russians have patent on the strut-tail combination

  • @samuelfitzpatrick9739
    @samuelfitzpatrick9739 2 роки тому +27

    Over the years we've seen that when it comes to military spending it's not so much about how much you spend bit what you spend it on.

    • @lowrezwater4933
      @lowrezwater4933 2 роки тому +1

      You can't really use this against america because they spend so much and spend it so well.

    • @philflip1963
      @philflip1963 2 роки тому +6

      @@lowrezwater4933 You've gotta be kidding! 8 Trillion missing from the Pentagon budget?

    • @jacer5677
      @jacer5677 2 роки тому +3

      @@lowrezwater4933 indeed the money is spent so well. but USA is funding hundreds of military bases abroad while China does not. meaning it is very likely that the budget used for innovation may be very close to each other

    • @robinlindberg1231
      @robinlindberg1231 Рік тому

      @@philflip1963 Almost as if instead of showing off the latest tech to brag to the rest of the world, they keep it a secret.

    • @randomguy7175
      @randomguy7175 Рік тому +5

      American military spends on gender studies 😂

  • @hudavid3256
    @hudavid3256 2 роки тому +34

    If the US can’t even win Vietnam, how can it win China with these?

    • @bruh5361
      @bruh5361 2 роки тому +23

      Literally comparing apples and bananas.
      PS: China also lost in Vietnam shortly after the US retreated.

    • @GeraldoluizAprendiz
      @GeraldoluizAprendiz 2 роки тому +15

      You can consider Korea and Afghanistan too.
      And no, US will not fight China in a military conflict. Despite all tough talk on both sides. China is not the usual target for america's military power (3rd world countries with no real military capacity)
      China is already to big to be enganged in a military conflict by anyone. And remenber that China has defeated US forces in a very important battle in the Korean War and thus keept the north Korea out of reach for Uncle SAM (China has made a movie about this recently and is a big hit in some countries of Asia). And China was a very poor country back on those days. Now it is different.
      Only if absolutly necessary a matter of life or death for the US we will see a direct confrontation and that does not include Taiwan. Let alone the fact that China is crucial partner for US economy like it or not and also for Europe and most countries in the world to be correct.
      China is not looking for a war either. They have a very clear strategy: to become the richest country in the world and a war is the last thing they need.
      No, no war in the horizon
      but the military indutrial complex is happy as never before.

    • @grassyvillain9549
      @grassyvillain9549 2 роки тому +2

      @@bruh5361 no, China retreat very quickly after doing the danger. US should have done the same, but they stay there like a fool.

    • @grassyvillain9549
      @grassyvillain9549 2 роки тому +1

      @@bruh5361 And also Vietnam never win, they pay a much Heavier price than US and China

    • @r3dpowel796
      @r3dpowel796 2 роки тому

      @@bruh5361 nope china did not launch full scale invasion into vietnam it tries to annex small region of vietnam because of pol pot. but by that point the vietnamese army were ready for ambush.

  • @BeastOrGod
    @BeastOrGod 2 роки тому +1

    "There's low risk of human casualties"
    *PROCEEDS TO DRONE STRIKE CHILDREN*

  • @josephstalin9357
    @josephstalin9357 2 роки тому

    This technology is just taking of

  • @CCCC-rc9ic
    @CCCC-rc9ic 2 роки тому +5

    Y is WSJ so obsessed with China?

  • @edwardlaw797
    @edwardlaw797 2 роки тому +22

    All I know is every drone on Amazon is made in China. Actually Amazon is pretty much made in China.

    • @DY-fy2jh
      @DY-fy2jh 2 роки тому

      So is every other retailer.

    • @pttyyjz8276
      @pttyyjz8276 2 роки тому

      man we own DJI

    • @edwardlaw797
      @edwardlaw797 2 роки тому

      @@pttyyjz8276 If we own DJI, then we shouldn't be limiting their sells in our military space. There is such a thing as "Google" to find out who owns DJI.

    • @pttyyjz8276
      @pttyyjz8276 2 роки тому

      @@edwardlaw797 Bro I’m not ur side…

  • @WynnofThule
    @WynnofThule 8 місяців тому

    5:33 what is the name of this one?

  • @DucaTech
    @DucaTech 2 роки тому

    The way that Elsa lady talks, reminds me of Ace Ventura Pet Detective.

  • @troyt8771
    @troyt8771 2 роки тому +3

    0:38 Wow that seems very disproportionate to their GDP difference

    • @Rex-ww4cw
      @Rex-ww4cw 2 роки тому +2

      China has always kept their military budget on 1% of their gdp until not long ago they decided to increase a little bit more

  • @hyuxion
    @hyuxion 2 роки тому +33

    it would be interested to compare the cost effectiveness of both military industries, I am going to bet China is more cost effective than USA. USA has spent too much resources to maintain the existing system, and not enough to develop into future systems.

    • @victorwang7974
      @victorwang7974 Рік тому +4

      Their "large" budget is for maintaining overseas military bases

  • @arifwaluyo5618
    @arifwaluyo5618 7 місяців тому

    If launch mac tark shou watt matting geit balt same toke mist mant meaning laik comfort fun early. Say fleet.

  • @rosemariebredahl9519
    @rosemariebredahl9519 Рік тому

    Given that I currently question whether Ukraine's allies are having to rethink which artillery and ammunition Ukraine needs in light of Elon Musk pulling out some Starlink GPS support previously provided, I'm wondering about what tech designa are focusing on and accomplishing diversified ways&means for location targeting (detection plus responsive actions). What updated info can your offer re this?

  • @spootnik00
    @spootnik00 2 роки тому +3

    Attack of the drones

  • @aijazmir1831
    @aijazmir1831 2 роки тому +17

    well done china

    • @underscore2002
      @underscore2002 2 роки тому +4

      well done? for destroying the muslim population of uyghur?

    • @triggerost9023
      @triggerost9023 2 роки тому +1

      @@underscore2002 Better than destroying countries in the middle east.

    • @poopdownthedrain3819
      @poopdownthedrain3819 2 роки тому

      @@triggerost9023 both are equally terrible… tf are you on about?

  • @user-nq8vt5xr6j
    @user-nq8vt5xr6j 2 роки тому +2

    I hate comparison. If I have to compare, I can only say that the United States is a superpower. China is just a developing country. The United States is number one in the world.

  • @Leezeo
    @Leezeo 2 роки тому +2

    Love it

  • @weijin7776
    @weijin7776 Рік тому +37

    In fact, an important reason why China is vigorously developing drones is that it lacks enough pilots. Unlike the United States, where there is a wide range of private aircraft, the Chinese do not have a similar history. So drones can help the Chinese get around this shortcoming. China's industrial capacity is relatively strong (industrial output equivalent to the United States + Germany + Japan), so a mass-produced drone, combined with China's developing artificial intelligence technology, would be an excellent overtaking.

    • @BS-vm5bt
      @BS-vm5bt Рік тому +4

      It depends on the future, the EU has been extremely de militarized for very long time with a extremely low military budget. Right now the EU re-arming again with the possibility of a EU army that can mass produce to a way larger extent then the US primary because it got double the population with similar gdp. The US is the only western military force that got a military budget over 2%. Japan, sk, EU are close to doubling its military spending this will impossible for china to overtake. The combined forces of the EU, US, Commonwealth, japan, south korea and taiwan. Maybe china might surpass the US in the future but I highly doubt china will surpass that combined force even with russia and iran. Russia mobilized all those nations after the invasion of ukrain. I hate this idiotic militarized world but that is what both the US and russia wanted so they can justify their 3% and higher gdp spending on the military.

    • @texasray5237
      @texasray5237 Рік тому

      @@BS-vm5bt
      The US likes to flash that
      military budget/gdp ratio
      because it makes them look big and strong.
      But there is another ratio that is much more relevant and pertinent,
      and that is
      military budget / BoP (balance of payment)
      That ratio killed the USSR and it will kill the USA very soon.

    • @changchadchanamdong2668
      @changchadchanamdong2668 11 місяців тому

      ​@@BS-vm5bt. Idiot m you talk like all of tthem well unite against china is a real ear. Lol

    • @MeanJackal
      @MeanJackal 5 місяців тому

      i have always thought about this. if china don't have enough pilots why not built more advanced combat drones and combine it with ai? it's much cheaper and safer than conventional fighter jets

    • @SerpentCommando
      @SerpentCommando 3 місяці тому

      ​@@BS-vm5btNot much, China manpower outnumbered U.S and EU combined. Mass production might take a long time to establish in Europe, but it's easier im China where they have too many worker.

  • @sundhaug92
    @sundhaug92 2 роки тому +14

    GJ-11 looks sorta similar to the RQ-170 except armed

    • @nesseihtgnay9419
      @nesseihtgnay9419 2 роки тому +2

      Of course, china copys

    • @wanglaugh9932
      @wanglaugh9932 2 роки тому +17

      Most of cars have four wheels and look the same.

    • @hellothere1656
      @hellothere1656 2 роки тому +4

      @@nesseihtgnay9419 Everyone copies. Airbus a320 looks like a Boeing 737. A BMW and a Ford both have 4 wheels. What exactly is ur point? China wanted a stealth drone, so it made one with a flying wing design to make it as stealthy as possible. But because rq170 uses the same flying wing design, you call China GJ11 a "copy"... so is the b2 bomber a copy of Nazi Germany's Horten bomber?

  • @bugstomper4670
    @bugstomper4670 2 роки тому

    'Roger Roger!' Just jam their communications, and the drones won't be able to coordinate.

  • @ZZZ2573
    @ZZZ2573 2 роки тому +1

    Non-profit means non-taxable

  • @strangelylookingperson
    @strangelylookingperson 2 роки тому +6

    Go China!

  • @mrvgranfield
    @mrvgranfield 2 роки тому +4

    she looks just like a real person amazing tech they need to get the smile right tho

  • @k.m.mehedialazam9000
    @k.m.mehedialazam9000 2 роки тому

    Drop it like it's hot 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

  • @barakaobombervsronaldraide3098
    @barakaobombervsronaldraide3098 2 роки тому +1

    Does dji make military drones?

    • @TL-fe9si
      @TL-fe9si 2 роки тому

      LOL, they'll be sanctioned before even thinking about it

  • @johnnyg6448
    @johnnyg6448 2 роки тому +4

    China lacks war experience, the US not only has the technology it also has the experience! Huge win by the US🇺🇸

    • @user-wr8sm6jp6j
      @user-wr8sm6jp6j 2 роки тому +3

      However, the United States cannot eliminate the Taliban guerrillas. Where is your so-called actual combat experience?😅😅😅

    • @dogandcat8475
      @dogandcat8475 2 роки тому +1

      US has the experience,may be you want to say US like war.

    • @johnnyg6448
      @johnnyg6448 2 роки тому

      @@dogandcat8475 yes we do 🇺🇸🇺🇸

    • @dogandcat8475
      @dogandcat8475 2 роки тому

      @@johnnyg6448 Yes you do. And kill 18 kids in Texas. Congratulations.

    • @paniniman6524
      @paniniman6524 Рік тому +1

      The us has experience losing for sure.

  • @seanjohnson2848
    @seanjohnson2848 Рік тому +1

    I just order DJI Avata

  • @syoushiro1837
    @syoushiro1837 2 роки тому +2

    I like how they said this is domination when all they do is make some lower-quality copy of the US military equipment...

  • @auro1986
    @auro1986 2 роки тому

    better you use aircraft piloted by human pilot. drones need satellite or some ground controlling station

  • @shawnz3307
    @shawnz3307 2 роки тому +4

    bummer, seems like staying peace is the most disadvantage for Chinese army in comparison.

  • @fucky889
    @fucky889 2 роки тому +29

    Most of these drones look like the American drones with a little modification.

    • @fucky889
      @fucky889 2 роки тому +1

      @claren guo all cars look like American cars and that a fact

    • @joyzhou1604
      @joyzhou1604 2 роки тому +1

      Have you been to a show called: before? My best friend saw Shen Yun before pandemic, she told me this was
      the first time she was moved to tears in a stage live show, So finally, I went to see Shen Yun with my whole family two months
      ago, I cried also---, What a great show! Actually I hadn’t believed a dance show would touch her heart so deeply until I watched
      it in real: brave, hope, warm, encouragement, energy, responsibility---, it’s hard to describe how I benefit from this two-hour show,
      but one thing I am sure is I won’t be beaten down no matter how difficult in the future life, I will never give up!

  • @rtyertrt7876
    @rtyertrt7876 2 роки тому

    Why does the sound like the opening plot of I have no mouth and I must scream

  • @rajithossain147
    @rajithossain147 2 роки тому +2

    I am just earlier than their drones.

  • @NancynMark
    @NancynMark 2 роки тому +6

    We're in hypersonic stealth rockets right now and we're improving better and better everyday And they're EMP proof!!!

  • @henryeghaghara9385
    @henryeghaghara9385 2 роки тому +17

    Imagine talking about drones and no mention of RQ180

    • @IllusiveDude
      @IllusiveDude 2 роки тому

      right ?

    • @Frosty_357
      @Frosty_357 2 роки тому

      Why there is no photo or design reveal?

    • @joyzhou1604
      @joyzhou1604 2 роки тому

      Have you been to a show called: before? My best friend saw Shen Yun before pandemic, she told me this was
      the first time she was moved to tears in a stage live show, So finally, I went to see Shen Yun with my whole family two months
      ago, I cried also---, What a great show! Actually I hadn’t believed a dance show would touch her heart so deeply until I watched
      it in real: brave, hope, warm, encouragement, energy, responsibility---, it’s hard to describe how I benefit from this two-hour show,
      but one thing I am sure is I won’t be beaten down no matter how difficult in the future life, I will never give up!

  • @alimurtaza6318
    @alimurtaza6318 Рік тому +1

    1:11 not anymore, pakistan has clearly declined US the permission to do those things on pakistani land or air space.

  • @bishwarajpleasedontsendany4645
    @bishwarajpleasedontsendany4645 2 роки тому

    No need to ad visitor advertiser videos clean videos only recommended

  • @amirkhanbaloch8385
    @amirkhanbaloch8385 2 роки тому +21

    China's development and advanced technology have frightened the United States. The US military is now competing not only with Russia but also with China. Problems for the United States could be serious in the future.

    • @JigilJigil
      @JigilJigil 2 роки тому +10

      You have no idea what are you speaking about, they are still struggling to make reliable engine for their fighters, they are not even able to make an airliner after 3 decades of trying and spending 100s billions of dollars, their comac airliner is totally dependant on American and European companies and suppliers, and Russia is third world country at least 4 decades behind US in every aspect of military technologies, US made their 5th gen fighter 20 years ago and Russia still striving to do so, even Russian military technology was mocked by India for lacking any advanced capabilities.

    • @robinlindberg1231
      @robinlindberg1231 Рік тому +1

      US is certainly not competing with Russia. Have you not seen the Ukraine invasion?

    • @tmgblaster6453
      @tmgblaster6453 11 місяців тому +1

      *_As an Indian 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 Chinese product is better than USA product, it's real, CHINESE PRODUCT 85%, USA PRODUCT 15% ONLY_*

    • @yoriel4962
      @yoriel4962 9 місяців тому

      😂 oh, please if it wasn’t for stealing data they would even be close…. Yet, there’s still way behind as some have stated. They can’t even build their own jet engines

  • @albertchu7926
    @albertchu7926 2 роки тому +3

    At least Chinese drones don’t kills innocent people like US drones. A good example are Afghanistan wars, how many innocent people have they kills but not punish for their actions !!!

  • @user-hi9kk1gt9t
    @user-hi9kk1gt9t 2 роки тому

    1985年,我还是小学生的时候,我在一个名字叫做湖北省小学生的杂志上看到一个和我岁数一样的小学生写的信,幻想未来的武器,就是一个机器人,可以飞到天上,发射导弹之后再返回机场。我记得编辑说这不是小发明,而是很重要的大发明
    In 1985, when I was a primary school student, I saw a letter written by a primary school student of my age in a magazine called Primary School Student in Hubei Province. he imagined that the weapon of the future was a robot that could fly to the sky and launch a missile. and then Go back to the airport. I remember the editor said that this is not a small invention, but a very important invention

  • @livefree1030
    @livefree1030 Рік тому

    Rumor in the tech defense world is china has a hypersonic drone that can operate up to 1300 miles