Ghost Bat Is An Aircraft Like No Other

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 чер 2022
  • The Boeing MQ-28 Ghost Bat, is a stealth, multirole, unmanned aerial vehicle in development by Boeing Australia for the Royal Australian Air Force.
    Ghost Bat utilizes artificial intelligence and is part of what was previously known as the Loyal Wingman project - an initiative to give fighter pilots an uncrewed partner in the sky.
    Will this new aircraft take over the skies?
    In next week's episode, we will talk about how US Army challenges the battlefield electricity problem; stay tuned.
    Subscribe to the channel and share the videos to support our upcoming series at Interesting Engineering:
    Materials Lab: bit.ly/3KprbOY
    Crafty Engineer: bit.ly/3aC8v2b
    Military Mechanics: bit.ly/3ta6FvQ
    Change the Future: bit.ly/3tofqCK
    Find us on Instagram: bit.ly/3PM21xW
    Find us on Facebook: bit.ly/3t2Huvb
    Find us on Twitter: bit.ly/3wQfXzA
    Find us on Tik Tok: bit.ly/3wNsBOu
    #InterestingEngineering #MilitaryMechanics
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 308

  • @Interestingengineeringofficial
    @Interestingengineeringofficial  3 місяці тому

    ⚙ Want to know more about the latest tech and innovations? Don’t Miss Out!
    *SUBSCRIBE & HIT THE BELL* 👉bit.ly/SubscribeNowIE

  • @RickyDownhillRDH
    @RickyDownhillRDH Рік тому +106

    Can you imagine the kinds of maneuvering and G-Forces these future planes will be able to demonstrate without a pilot?

    • @cortney3280
      @cortney3280 Рік тому +2

      Well USA has that already

    • @cortney3280
      @cortney3280 Рік тому +1

      They got phantoms and f16 without pilots

    • @RickyDownhillRDH
      @RickyDownhillRDH Рік тому +6

      @@cortney3280 Nah man. I mean in 10 or 20 years. 👍🏼

    • @benz9063
      @benz9063 Рік тому +1

      NGAD is meant to do that.

    • @NineSeptims
      @NineSeptims Рік тому

      @Lasha Japaridze yup dogfight capability isnt important anymore. modern air to air missiles made that rare and they teach you to let off missiles and run.

  • @notimportant8120
    @notimportant8120 Рік тому +15

    It’s starting to look like the top-down shooter games we had back in the 80s-90s, you gain additional wingmen with the power ups you collect

  • @mrwatcherofmovies
    @mrwatcherofmovies Рік тому +21

    Ghost Bat + Wing Man = Bat Man

    • @hifinsword
      @hifinsword 2 місяці тому +1

      Where does that leave Robin? 😄

  • @mostlymessingabout
    @mostlymessingabout Рік тому +53

    I’m looking forward to the Ding Bat

    • @DansModelBench
      @DansModelBench Рік тому +6

      lol. That would be the pilot in the manned aircraft flying with it.

    • @rogerwilco5918
      @rogerwilco5918 Рік тому

      @@larrysmith2485 yeah, but the last guy made him look like Einstein..
      The dingbat sounds like something like space cadets would use in "space force".
      Remember when the reality star repackaged and rebranded Air Force space command, like it was a frozen steak or a cheap vodka, then he acted like he came up with some whole new concept?

    • @spartancrown
      @spartancrown Рік тому

      @@rogerwilco5918 I remember when for the first time in decades he didn’t start a foreign conflict somewhere and was bringing troops out of conflict zones along with calling others like China and NATO allies on their bullshit and again after decades of no progress got the Abraham accords done for Israel. There isn’t a single accomplishment you can name worth anything that supposed Einstein has accomplished in his decades long membership of the political elite class.

    • @rogerwilco5918
      @rogerwilco5918 Рік тому

      @@spartancrown I guess it's quite impressive that Trump didn't start any War considering he's a Republican.
      Remember the time he assassinated the vice president of iran?

    • @rogerwilco5918
      @rogerwilco5918 Рік тому

      @@spartancrown do you think things would have gone differently in Afghanistan if Trump hadn't withdrawn all the combat forces and surrendered to the taliban?

  • @grey5135
    @grey5135 Рік тому +30

    You could have guessed that that was a Boeing product without being told it's got their look for sure. It's kind of cool to see the design language between manufacturers a lot like automakers have their unique design language.

    • @L33tSkE3t
      @L33tSkE3t Рік тому +5

      Yea, I can see that. It Kind of looks like the BOEING YF-32 prototype, their Phantom UAV, MQ-25 Stingray UAV, and the Loyal Wingman variant

    • @harryhatter2962
      @harryhatter2962 Рік тому +2

      Actually Grey is was fully designed , engineered and manufactured in Australia and had absolutely NO US input so what you say is rubbish!

    • @SuperCatacata
      @SuperCatacata Рік тому

      @@harryhatter2962 Does where it was designed or manufactured matter? It's still made by Boeing. Made completely using techniques they have pioneered. And with their complete oversight.
      Stop being dumb. If you think this joint effort had 0 input or help from Boeing you are lost.
      Teslas manufactured in China aren't made with 0 input from Tesla. They aren't viewed as Chinese cars either. They are still Teslas. Where they are made or designed doesn't change whos responsible for it being made. And who's emblem goes on it because it is their product.

    • @alpacaofthemountain8760
      @alpacaofthemountain8760 8 місяців тому

      True

    • @alpacaofthemountain8760
      @alpacaofthemountain8760 8 місяців тому

      source? @@harryhatter2962

  • @johnwatson8004
    @johnwatson8004 Рік тому +7

    I love it when you have a good line coach, offensive coach each doing their own job.

  • @timn6864
    @timn6864 Рік тому +11

    The idea isn't to develop a fighter drone to mirror the capability of a piloted aircraft. Imagine them more as a stealthy drone which can triangulate over-the-horizon weapons. A pilot can fire and forget.. then move to other targets while the bat guides it beyond any radar reach.

  • @ianrobinson8974
    @ianrobinson8974 Рік тому +30

    12/07/2022 EXCELLANT. The Australian aviation industry has been in the forefront of innovation for a long time. A UAV was developed and used years and years ago with the name of Jindivik, an Indigenous name, but I cannot remembe its' English translation. They were used as a target UAV before uav's were known as such. Keep up the good work MATES! Boeing is now involved as we do not have our own aircraft manufacturer and longer. CAC brough out by Boeing?

    • @koalaseatleaves1277
      @koalaseatleaves1277 Рік тому

      It apparently means "The Hunted One"

    • @williamhardes8081
      @williamhardes8081 Рік тому +1

      good old Aussie innovation again!

    • @yeoshenghong4802
      @yeoshenghong4802 Рік тому +1

      What it main purpose to take hit for the pilot aircraft? Or to have jamming system or search radar or carry additional AMRAM ?

    • @aldisozols2522
      @aldisozols2522 Рік тому

      @@yeoshenghong4802 The Jindivik was a target drone, used to train pilots in gunnery. It wasn't meant for combat. It was built in the early 1950s, so was fairly advanced at the time.

    • @nedkelly9688
      @nedkelly9688 Рік тому +3

      Go research Australian Hypersonic drone first flight should be next year. Using the Spartan Australian scramjet that records state by company it was used in all HIFIRE Hypersonic tests and built around Ray Stalkers designs.
      World's fastest scramjet at Mach 12 and first 3D printed one.

  • @johnmay6090
    @johnmay6090 Рік тому +7

    It's the R double A F.

  • @Playtime-lu8wj
    @Playtime-lu8wj Рік тому +6

    The secretive AI control being developed by the Australians is the key to the MQ-28 Ghost Bat.

  • @mick20227
    @mick20227 Рік тому +12

    It's good to see we are stepping up to the challenges of the future!
    Although six really isn't going to be enough surely!
    Good video!

    • @nedkelly9688
      @nedkelly9688 Рік тому +2

      only six until tests are conducted and if sucessful then would buy more.
      Australia is going more in to AI drones.. even getting AI drone submarines now too.
      A Aussie comapny is building a Hypersonic drone now also using a Australian scramjet that they claim is fastest and most advanced in the world, say can control it's speed back and forth and can turn it on and off during flight so can travel further.
      say it's been in HIFIRE tests and i guess has if are putting it in a drone as rocket tests would of been done first.

    • @rebelrob9637
      @rebelrob9637 10 місяців тому +1

      The pentagon has requested the technology so they can test it and possibly implement it into their programs. They have done the same with the Ghost bat. They want some of their own.

  • @peterdwyer4609
    @peterdwyer4609 Рік тому +17

    Us ozzies have a high engineering standard, and we do more than most realise,,

    • @ThomasWLalor
      @ThomasWLalor Рік тому +1

      You make an iconic slouch hat, too

    • @nedkelly9688
      @nedkelly9688 Рік тому +5

      Australia is actually a world leader in Hypersonics also.. Australian company claims have the most advanced scramjet in the world and has been used in Australia Hypersonic secret tests, anyway they are building a drone and it's first flight will be next year. world's fastest at Mach 12 also.
      Australian defence has been behind it all the way and was built off Ray Stalkers designs.

  • @kcdiazWTV
    @kcdiazWTV Рік тому +5

    Pilot to Ghost Bat: You can be my wingman anytime.
    Ghost Bat to pilot: Beep bop beep bop.

  • @bigman23DOTS
    @bigman23DOTS Рік тому +5

    Would be quite significant to be armed internally with a long range anti ship missile and linked to naval vessels in particular the rather naked arufura opvs

  • @BS-vm5bt
    @BS-vm5bt 10 місяців тому +2

    Now with airbus vs boeing again. Will be interesting to see what differences there will be between NGAD, FCAS and Tempest. Though it is a possibility that Tempest and FCAS merge since we both develop drones that are compatible with each other.
    Fun to see the old rivalry continue from the civil aviation market to the military domain. Will be interesting what the differences will be between each 6th gen programs capabilities.

  • @mitchellbutler7068
    @mitchellbutler7068 3 місяці тому +1

    Yes impressive, it wont be long till they teach missiles to see the difference in shape between a ghost bat and an F-35 . Heat seeking is the main structure now but with this tech there will be upgrades made to combat it . I think these kind of innovations will have to eventually mimic size and scale of the aircraft they shadow . Brilliant technology

  • @christopherhiggins8238
    @christopherhiggins8238 Рік тому +3

    The SKYNET Air Force begins... hehe But on a serious note that is cool as hell.

  • @smeary10
    @smeary10 7 місяців тому +1

    It'll have swappable modular nose sections that will enable Ghost Bat to do recon, search & rescue, air to air, air to ground, CAS, anti-radar, and electronic spectrum jamming. So a single manned parent aircraft will be able to have a squadron of Ghost Bats flying with it, all with differing nose cones allowing each one to perform a different mission profile on the same mission. The fact that it's extremely stealthy and very fast, and the fact that it's already test flown and that there are a number actually built and testing makes the Ghost Bat the most advanced UAV in the world with its capabilities. Nothing else on the drawing board or operational is this far down the track with these capabilities and perfomance. These will only be made available to close allies.

  • @BeerGutGuy
    @BeerGutGuy Рік тому +29

    Currently a research project, but in the future it will provide air to air, air to ground and surveillance at less than ~10% the cost of a F-35. They can be produced quickly so you don't need to keep a large quantity in storage.

    • @MrNightroder01
      @MrNightroder01 Рік тому +2

      you wouldn't know if they are in service doing these missions now.

    • @cosmoray9750
      @cosmoray9750 Рік тому

      war of propaganda’: John Pilger on....
      ua-cam.com/video/u9pEotvlW-s/v-deo.html
      share.....

    • @Smokeyr67
      @Smokeyr67 Рік тому +2

      @@MrNightroder01 There’s only a few in the air at the moment, being tested out of Amberley (with the Growlers).

    • @typeins5139
      @typeins5139 Рік тому +2

      @@Smokeyr67 yeah but you don’t know and nobody of us hopefully will ever know how much they really build from that or already have from future airplanes hiding until they need them in a real conflict

    • @nedkelly9688
      @nedkelly9688 Рік тому

      @@typeins5139 Australian company and Defence are building a Hypersonic drone with Australias scramjet and they state it's been used in secret tests and is worlds fastest and most advanced in the world. This scramjet been in HIFIRE tests

  • @leslienordman8718
    @leslienordman8718 Рік тому

    _Very_ Interesting! :-)

  • @yellowgold4366
    @yellowgold4366 Рік тому +4

    Humans, a creation ourselves, create creations that imitate creations made by the ultimate creator.

  • @aatkarelse8218
    @aatkarelse8218 Рік тому +7

    Even the most boring version of this concept has great potential: as an carrier of extra ordinance, having a radar on board so the human pilots are not spotted, as decoys.

  • @RachelBaylesLacey
    @RachelBaylesLacey Рік тому

    Thanks!

  • @artkingofwholefoods74
    @artkingofwholefoods74 Рік тому +2

    That looks like the Phoenix from G Force!

  • @HarryCriswell-pz1rm
    @HarryCriswell-pz1rm 10 місяців тому

    Nice!!!!......

  • @williamwhitney5266
    @williamwhitney5266 Рік тому +5

    USA has the White Bat
    Auss my good friends now have the Ghost Bat Hell Yeah

    • @troystaunton254
      @troystaunton254 5 місяців тому

      Man I’m so excited for this to be paired with USA F35 and of course your next Gen stuff.

  • @TheMilpitasguy
    @TheMilpitasguy Рік тому +14

    Interesting concept. I knew about the Valkyrie stealth drones as loyal wingmen for the F-35A, just had not thought about them serving as loyal wingmen for E-3 Sentry AWACS as well, negating the need for fighter escorts when they're operating alone. China has made boastful claims about using J-20s as AWACS-killers and midair-refueler-killers before.

    • @brianjob3018
      @brianjob3018 Рік тому +1

      Well-written, friend. Referring to the US, I want to be a stickler and ask isn't something like the E-8 replacing the old E-3? It's also interesting that the profile showed a two-engined AWACS with other than a radome that Australia is using.

    • @AusExplorer
      @AusExplorer Рік тому +4

      @@brianjob3018 Its called the E-7 Wedgetail.
      www.airforce.gov.au/technology/aircraft/intelligence-surveillance-and-reconnaissance/e-7a-wedgetail
      Now operated in by 4 countries and the USA will be replacing their E-3s with it in the next few years.
      The U.S. Air Force said the E-7 "is the only platform capable of meeting the requirements for the Defense Department’s tactical battle management, command and control and moving target indication capabilities within the time-frame needed to replace the aging E-3.”

    • @brianjob3018
      @brianjob3018 Рік тому

      @@AusExplorer How is the West going to keep our orbiting "ducks" out of enemy fighter missile range, which is around 100 miles now, and protect against hypersonics, big naval SAMs and other long-rangers?

    • @politenessman3901
      @politenessman3901 Рік тому +2

      @@brianjob3018 Yes, the US is procuring Wedgetail, if their procurement system as a bit less arthritic they could take advantage of the many pristine B737s looking for new homes because of the aviation downturn from covid and the fuel price spike.

    • @hifinsword
      @hifinsword 2 місяці тому +1

      @@politenessman3901 The only airframe the USAF would ever update is the B-52 Buff. Saving money on a used 737 would be an anathema to the USAF. Between the top brass of the USAF and congress members, it's all about spending BIG BUCKS in a congress person's district, not saving $$$.

  • @aa2339
    @aa2339 Рік тому +2

    It can be the disposable point man as well.

  • @DMulabiTalejan
    @DMulabiTalejan Рік тому +1

    Thanks for this. What is 'SINGLE COMPOSITE PIECE"? Is this like no joined up parts for the entire thing? Does this mean it was 3D printed?

    • @goodshipkaraboudjan
      @goodshipkaraboudjan Рік тому

      Sort of David, it means that there was no need for load bearing bulkheads or such. Meaning it's extremely lightweight, the piece is essentially carbon fiber - like an F1 car chassis.

  • @gfy69
    @gfy69 Рік тому

    The 1st option, wow...

  • @WhoThisMonkey
    @WhoThisMonkey 4 місяці тому

    Have one large mothership plane, and many drones orbiting it, they can work as countermeasures and payload distribution.

  • @MrSimonw58
    @MrSimonw58 Рік тому +2

    In Australia it's the Wom bat

  • @quecksilber457
    @quecksilber457 4 місяці тому

    Dang, Oswald Boelke. I served at Jagdbombergeschwader 31 "Boelke" now called Taktisches Luftwaffengeschwader 31 "Boelke".

  • @lingth
    @lingth Рік тому +1

    Hmm so in the near future it will have combat abilities? So late.. how about a version of the Ghost Bat that can also auto refuel midair with tankers.

  • @cab6273
    @cab6273 Рік тому

    This is the future

  • @Larsbor
    @Larsbor 3 місяці тому

    So is it suppose to be controlled with bluetooth?

  • @rickyboy5274
    @rickyboy5274 21 годину тому

    IT'S A DUD !!!

  • @fredsmith4134
    @fredsmith4134 Рік тому +10

    i find it strange australia is developing this device , i did not think we had the capability ?

    • @MattWeberWA
      @MattWeberWA Рік тому +13

      It's a combination of partnering with and gaining expertise from Boeing and a shitload of latent capacity inherent in any well educated first world economy. Australia has the money and educated workforce to do pretty much anything we want to with a couple of very specific exceptions (nuclear being the big one). We just don't often choose to on a large scale because it's often more economical to buy from overseas where there are established supply chains and larger (often lower cost) workforces.
      It's perhaps telling that this is the time the government decided we needed to bring some combat aviation manufacturing capabilities on shore. See also the plan to make missiles domestically. They're (not improperly) nervous about strategic autonomy.

    • @antbra3262
      @antbra3262 Рік тому

      With it part of NATO they can do anything

    • @Geebax2
      @Geebax2 Рік тому +1

      We built the Jindivick remote pilotless aircraft long before the US even had one.

    • @disposabull
      @disposabull Рік тому +2

      @@MattWeberWA Much smaller and dumber countries have gone nuclear, it is not difficult. Politics prevent that from happening not money or education.

    • @MattWeberWA
      @MattWeberWA Рік тому

      @@disposabull Don't misunderstand, I don't think we can't do it in principle. We just don't have the industry here, thus we don't really have a very large base of appropriately educated workforce, so spooling up any kind of nuclear industry would take a very long time. AUKUS sub programme might help a little with that, but not so much as we're not building or even refuelling the reactors locally.

  • @starman4346
    @starman4346 Рік тому +5

    we gotta pull a F22 move and give this to nobody

    • @calebmurphy7343
      @calebmurphy7343 Рік тому

      Wondering how long it will take China to pirate the shit out of it 🤷‍♂️

    • @seanavp
      @seanavp Рік тому +2

      *But, you do have the F-35.*

    • @marrqi7wini54
      @marrqi7wini54 Рік тому

      Besides everyone else is already starting to implement such drones. Plus this is under Boeing, the US can definitely get this drone or something better if it wishes.

    • @stevebell7288
      @stevebell7288 Рік тому +1

      We’re committed to AUKUS so it’ll be give and take if all three are to benefit

  • @trapaneezus
    @trapaneezus 5 місяців тому

    The future is now!

  • @buzzmeanytime
    @buzzmeanytime 3 місяці тому

    We’ll see.

  • @sporehux8344
    @sporehux8344 3 місяці тому

    "Operationally useful dive" ? 4:40 , what a fancy way to say Kamikaze action

  • @dot3736
    @dot3736 2 роки тому

    ❤️

  • @tonyklymson8096
    @tonyklymson8096 Рік тому +2

    The Chinese knock off could be your Ding Bat .

  • @YourDadsBoyfriend
    @YourDadsBoyfriend Рік тому +2

    Skynet is become self aware....

  • @peterweller8583
    @peterweller8583 Рік тому +2

    There is a lot of potential in UCAV's
    One I am sure has been decided by more countries than mentioned.

  • @techkid1833
    @techkid1833 Рік тому +2

    Okay ghost 🦇🦇🦇🦇🦇🦇🦇🦇🦇👀

  • @pedrojim7667
    @pedrojim7667 Рік тому

    Stealth

  • @karloyu3484
    @karloyu3484 Рік тому

    ❤️❤️👍

  • @necronlord52
    @necronlord52 6 місяців тому

    Oh, God of the Machine, accept those sacred oils!
    It's only me who sees those red ribbons? They are the Seals of Purity!

  • @moodhot
    @moodhot Рік тому +1

    Skynet already in development

  • @Zetraxes
    @Zetraxes 2 роки тому +1

    did they say it is made out of resin?

    • @hdmccart6735
      @hdmccart6735 2 роки тому +1

      Resin infused composite materials. Like an F1 car.

  • @constructiongabay4609
    @constructiongabay4609 Рік тому +1

    Eddie is going to be real in 10 years.

    • @tinaliebe5118
      @tinaliebe5118 Рік тому

      That’s if we don’t scrap it first 😁😁😁🇦🇺

  • @YouTube_user3333
    @YouTube_user3333 Рік тому +6

    Aerospace uses metric
    Australia uses metric
    This aircraft was built with metric
    Rest of the world uses metric
    Americans: I’m not using those commie units 🙄

  • @petersinclair3997
    @petersinclair3997 Рік тому +2

    Believe one goal is to mass produce the Ghost Bat at a cost of AUD 2 million per unit, and to AI controlled swarms.

    • @rebelrob9637
      @rebelrob9637 10 місяців тому +2

      The US wants them now too. To integrate into their NGAD program and fly alongside their 6th gen fighter which will replace the F22.

  • @DJ70404
    @DJ70404 3 місяці тому

    Wow... we have a whole 3 of em. Do we even have 3 yet?

    • @robman2095
      @robman2095 3 місяці тому

      Do you know anything about how aircraft are developed?

    • @DJ70404
      @DJ70404 3 місяці тому

      @@robman2095 I know a little bit.

  • @alexanderbonardi4514
    @alexanderbonardi4514 Рік тому +8

    Calling it "Loyal" would imply disloyalty by the previous wingmen....just saying 😏

    • @rogerwilco5918
      @rogerwilco5918 Рік тому

      Don't You remember When Maverick left Cougar's wing to showboat with the mig?
      I don't think cougar was "doing just fine on his own", but Maverick still left him..

    • @yhird
      @yhird Рік тому

      Exactly. Well said.

    • @Dude408f
      @Dude408f Рік тому

      A NK hacker could make it disloyal

  • @unkn0wnv1rus3
    @unkn0wnv1rus3 Рік тому +1

    While it is very cool, it is kinda scary to think that fleets of these aircraft can being controlled by a rogue AI in the future.

    • @Dude408f
      @Dude408f Рік тому +1

      1. That idea lacks originality.
      2. Controlling a fleet would require purpose. To have an AI with purpose of it's own and that purpose to be nefarius will require much time, IMHO.
      3. A state or some terrorists would try to hack and control a fleet of drones MUCH sooner. Therefore, I think you should worry about that more than worrying about an evil AI

  • @donpierce4829
    @donpierce4829 7 місяців тому

    The US Navy and AF is going to order quite a few. What's really unique is they have interchangeable front noses that can be changed for different missions!!

  • @JohnDoe-fn6zd
    @JohnDoe-fn6zd Рік тому +1

    One time, there was a movie of one UAV, pilot by AI flying with 3 aircrafts with human pilots, AI pilot tech is so advance it can do better than human pilot..
    Now. It is a reality... Wow

  • @downundergarage6968
    @downundergarage6968 3 місяці тому

    love how they are using cheapo Bunnings drill tool.. hope the wingman does not fall apart after 2 years..

  • @nealrcn
    @nealrcn Рік тому +4

    I do not understand why it does not fly supersonic. I know dog fighting is generally done below the speed of sound, Fighters go fast to get into or leave the fight if the wingman cannot keep up that is a problem.

    • @forgivemenot1
      @forgivemenot1 Рік тому +5

      Cost, you need more powerful engines and more fuel which means a bigger more expensive aircraft, the advantage of these aircraft is they are expendable in operations, for example say two of these were with a live pilot he could send them ahead into a situation that would mean them getting shot down in the process of completing the mission which is a much more acceptable loss than a very high cost aircraft and pilot.

  • @kellyr2681
    @kellyr2681 Рік тому

    No mention of the internal weapons bay.....lol.

  • @311Bob
    @311Bob Рік тому

    Whats their purpose again? A missile sponge? I think it would be cheaper to trail decoys behind the jet than this thing. Arm it with extra aa missiles and you have it but supper stealth it and let it fly way behind or way out front and things get interesting

  • @SuperJohn12354
    @SuperJohn12354 Рік тому

    It’s called loyal wingman

  • @stevoc9930
    @stevoc9930 Рік тому

    I seen this movie it starred Jamie Foxx.

  • @jonathanmeisman5794
    @jonathanmeisman5794 Рік тому

    1:33 a Ryobi drill?!?!? On a multi million aircraft?

    • @zelious9464
      @zelious9464 Рік тому +2

      Can't get much more Australian than doing something important with a $50 Ryobi drill from Bunnings XD

  • @dezent
    @dezent 3 місяці тому

    Wonder what amazing name it will get when someone realize Boeing forgot to screw down the hatches.

  • @sirdrip1313
    @sirdrip1313 Рік тому

    This exact same thing is in Halo ODST

  • @Depresdude
    @Depresdude 2 місяці тому

    If it's a ucav wingman but there is no man controlling it.. then it's a wing?

  • @biswajitbhattavharjya2115
    @biswajitbhattavharjya2115 Місяць тому

    Technology?

  • @tunguyenvan7922
    @tunguyenvan7922 Рік тому

    Norman

  • @Tribune123
    @Tribune123 Рік тому

    The future is One pilot in One Powerful, direct trajectory Jet (The center), surrounded by Several autonomous wing men (The Flanks). The Ancient world meets the future.

    • @Dude408f
      @Dude408f Рік тому

      That configuration could be weaker than a pack of aircrafts that are more interchangeable

  • @michaelusswisconsin6002
    @michaelusswisconsin6002 Рік тому

    AC7?

  • @therealfearsome
    @therealfearsome Рік тому +1

    hum...single structure resin infused,.....20G?....

  • @TheGito413
    @TheGito413 Рік тому

    That's Eddie, he killed Jaime Fox in Stealth.

  • @animalanimal7939
    @animalanimal7939 Рік тому +1

    What about space ghost

  • @johnbrown6189
    @johnbrown6189 2 місяці тому

    Would you want a Boeing product as your wing man?

  • @AlexMadhi
    @AlexMadhi 3 місяці тому

    look for kizilelma

  • @flotech11
    @flotech11 Рік тому

    Anyone thinking District 9?

  • @razony
    @razony Рік тому

    Ghost Mav. (Maverick) Sounds better. Bat sounds... Batty. But I'm American.

  • @maxbgi70
    @maxbgi70 3 місяці тому

    Will it shoot down its own wingman? Never know with boeing. Lol…. Missles may unexpectedly shoot!

  • @user-py2ik5ho9n
    @user-py2ik5ho9n Рік тому

    Digital wing

  • @badmarshmallow9211
    @badmarshmallow9211 Рік тому +1

    I’m in the Australian Air Force Cadets and we learn about this drone in our squadron bc some of us will eventually be flying alongside this thing. In the future, we learnt that RAAF pilots will act more like mobile command centres that give out orders and info to the drones and they will protect the human pilots. It’s kinda cool but idk what they’ll be about to do about protecting human pilots from long range hypersonic missiles like the Russian R-37. In my opinion human pilots aren’t going to be used for combat missions in the future but logistical missions instead. Idk tho. Curious to know what u guys think.

    • @goodshipkaraboudjan
      @goodshipkaraboudjan Рік тому

      AAFC, so you don't get given much info. Just look forward to bivouacs and learning how to march. If you join the RAAF don't expect to be straight into unmanned gear.

    • @badmarshmallow9211
      @badmarshmallow9211 Рік тому

      @@goodshipkaraboudjan Ik, I’m not really planning to join the RAAF and I know that drones won’t be running SEAD or anything like that overnight. I just think that it’s cool that some of the people I know might get the chance to fly alongside a drone.

  • @lostbirdsproduction
    @lostbirdsproduction Рік тому +1

    U.S. Wingman

  • @joelhungerford8388
    @joelhungerford8388 Рік тому

    In Australia a wingman is a good friend who helps you pick up women haha

  • @bbgcars
    @bbgcars Рік тому

    WOW THE MOVIE STEALTH BECOMES REALITY!

  • @harryhatter2962
    @harryhatter2962 Рік тому

    It will be devloped with a scram jet engine.......which is more than mach 7

    • @petersinclair3997
      @petersinclair3997 Рік тому

      Mach 7. Then twenty of them, autonomously communicating with each other? No pilot in the air?

  • @hrhamada1982
    @hrhamada1982 7 місяців тому

    prefer Valkyrie over Ghost Bat

  • @dennismorgan7297
    @dennismorgan7297 Рік тому +4

    Uk should had not cancelled it loyal wingman project

    • @smeary10
      @smeary10 Рік тому +2

      Mate, Britain should never have cancelled the TSR project.
      That's where the world leading British aviation industry began to collapse.

    • @mariano7699
      @mariano7699 Рік тому +1

      @@smeary10 :
      US ☠️pirates☠️ are subliminally exploiting British slavery

    • @forgivemenot1
      @forgivemenot1 Рік тому +4

      That's the purpose of AUKUS so the the US and UK and Australia can pool recourses and share technology benefiting everyone.

    • @marrqi7wini54
      @marrqi7wini54 Рік тому +1

      @@forgivemenot1
      Australia is apart of the commonwealth right? Shouldn't the UK (Along with Canada and others.) have some access to this if this turns out to be quite valuable?

    • @forgivemenot1
      @forgivemenot1 Рік тому +1

      @@marrqi7wini54 The Commonwealth isn't a security arrangement so no.
      AUKAS is a trilateral security agreement between Australia, UK and USA and under that agreement there is a raft of measures including technology sharing in specific domains such as missile technology cybersecurity and nuclear submarines.
      Other country's might join but I would think Japan would be ahead of Canada.

  • @paghilumdihauy
    @paghilumdihauy 3 місяці тому

    chaynaaa wants this jets as well, HAHHAHAHHAAHHA

  • @turgaysarac337
    @turgaysarac337 4 місяці тому

    the other is Kizilelma from Turkiye sorry

  • @troystaunton254
    @troystaunton254 5 місяців тому

    Man I’m so excited for this to be aligned with the F35. But imagine what it’ll do with the USA 6th generation planes. It and other will make Russia’s and china’s airforces redundant.

  • @rickblackwell6435
    @rickblackwell6435 Рік тому +1

    Man, can you turn the music down please.

  • @goodnewsnavid479
    @goodnewsnavid479 2 роки тому

    Resin ?!?

    • @hdmccart6735
      @hdmccart6735 2 роки тому

      Resin infused composite materials. Like an F1 car.

  • @blisteringstars
    @blisteringstars Рік тому +1

    why tf would it dogfight when it can bvr

  • @KCJbomberFTW
    @KCJbomberFTW Рік тому

    Why only six? Why not 400?

  • @stephenstalking2149
    @stephenstalking2149 4 місяці тому +1

    Are the doors fully bolted?

    • @hifinsword
      @hifinsword 2 місяці тому

      That would be the Lockheed version, not the Boeing version! 😀

  • @buzzmeanytime
    @buzzmeanytime 3 місяці тому

    Does it come with a Gun?