Yo Satellarknight I was at locals playing tellars, trying to end on paradice, and I had a judge rule that paradice is apparently not a legal target for Capella??? I was so confused since I've never had any issues before so I launched up Master duel to confirm and you can imagine my surprise when yeah wtf, the game won't let me use capellas effect to summon paradice anymore?
@ that's what I'm saying! Apparently if the card doesn't say "3" or "3+" it's not a legal target, what I was more surprised about tho was the fact that Master duel ruled it the same way, which was never the way it was ruled a month ago
@ i agree, as long as 3 actual Tellar monsters are used for the summon of a monster asking for "2+" it 100% should be a legal target, I'm trying to find any form of ruling to rule it that way but as it stands they are only going based off Precedent and since there is no TCG ruling not OCG ruling they're going based off master duel, which again was not ruling it that way as of a month ago, they just randomly changed it with no notice or explanation
@satellarknight9476 so basically, if I replace the fiendsmith engine with the horus cards (and the cards like the zombie vampire that go with them), this build will still operate well? Also, if I run the horus engine, should I still run the collosus package or should switch it out for something else?
Yo Satellarknight I was at locals playing tellars, trying to end on paradice, and I had a judge rule that paradice is apparently not a legal target for Capella??? I was so confused since I've never had any issues before so I launched up Master duel to confirm and you can imagine my surprise when yeah wtf, the game won't let me use capellas effect to summon paradice anymore?
@@HighlordUmbriel can the judge not read the card?
@@HighlordUmbriel you can totally summon pairadice
@ that's what I'm saying! Apparently if the card doesn't say "3" or "3+" it's not a legal target, what I was more surprised about tho was the fact that Master duel ruled it the same way, which was never the way it was ruled a month ago
@miguelito029 I can tell you that it's a completely legal move. You're meeting all the criteria
@ i agree, as long as 3 actual Tellar monsters are used for the summon of a monster asking for "2+" it 100% should be a legal target, I'm trying to find any form of ruling to rule it that way but as it stands they are only going based off Precedent and since there is no TCG ruling not OCG ruling they're going based off master duel, which again was not ruling it that way as of a month ago, they just randomly changed it with no notice or explanation
Damn i was hoping for horus. It's a great list tho.
The horus deck is just a sub archetype to this one, so it is still relevant here
@satellarknight9476 so basically, if I replace the fiendsmith engine with the horus cards (and the cards like the zombie vampire that go with them), this build will still operate well? Also, if I run the horus engine, should I still run the collosus package or should switch it out for something else?
@TJenki correct you can still do the same thing, except unlike horus fiendsmith can easily get into tellars and vise versa
fiend goo