Russia's war technics wîl be studied in schools around the globe for many years to come! How can 1 country stand tall against 34 Western ultra armed countries?
You only need to see the video of the Oreshnik arrival to understand. The speed and no surface explosion tells you what happened. Everything underground in that huge area was turned to dust.
@Metoo3232-pu2wc That's nice....bombs are dropped from a plane so you would first have to fly a plane to your target......the Oreshnik is ballistic missile that cannot be intercepted by US technology, and it can carry nuclear warheads. So what is your point?
It should be said, that ukraine cannot target bryansk without american satelites and american personal operating the HIMARS system. Thus ukraine is not doing this, but america wich makes them directly involved. Wich is exactly what putin warned for. And this is why oreshnik was launched. This channel got it wrong.
No ome is afraid of Russia or Putin anymore. People don't even listen to Putin's red lines anymore. He is the boy who cried wolf with the nearly bankrupt paper bear.
Russia is fake, error 404 country. putin underestimated Ukraine, it's people and ukrainians' technological abilities. Russia will NOT win this war. No chance!
ATACMS destroyed 2 oil refineries including the only one that Russia had producing fuel for their fighter jets yesterday and 5 missile defence systems in one day. A few more days like thatr Russia won't have gas or missile defence systems. Bravo Russia indeed you have shown you are incapable of stopping a 45 year old weapon being used in very tiny numbers like 1 50th what a NATO atacms attack would involve.
ATSCMS destroyed 2 Russian oil refineries and 5 missile defence systems in one day. The two things Russia needs most. It cannot even rebuild the refineries the American oil companies built them and Putin foolishly stole their assets and kicked them out of the country. Russia doesn't have the knowhow or the equipment needed to rebuild them. One of the refineries was the only one that made fuel for Russian fighter jets LOL. Russia's air force war useless anyways no big loss.
😅 Russia is crumbling. Half of their tanks destroyed. Air defenses being destroyed. Ukraine destroying targets IN Russia more and more. Oil refinery, destroyed. Drone warehouse, destroyed. Russia is desperate. In a war, they can't win, and no way to save face.
Russia is on the verge of economic collapse fighting against the poorest country in Europe that has no navy and no air force and is 1 tenth Russia's size. Putin ruined Russia and set the country back 50 years. Now China will soon take over Russia Yeah Putin sure showed everyone what a complete and utter moron he is.
Ukraine got 500 ATCMS's and they are gone by now. As the system is no longer produced, because of its limitations, this was a cheap decommission of scrap for the US. And as usual it will add to the lend & lease debt Ukraine has to pay for. So instead having costs the US sold heir outdated weaponry to Ukraine. Generations will have to pay for this debt.
The US will forgive the debt. Just had to get rid of old inventory. I mean obviously Ukraine will be a vassal state but they won't owe too much. The rest of Europe might come for their piece though Depending on if the Americans can keep them under control or not
@@SnakePliskin762 Be that as it may, with a nuclear payload it doesn't matter if it is inaccurate as long as it is impossible to intercept, where things stand now.
The ATACMS was invented during the COLD WAR in the 1980's. For a 40+ year old weapon system, it terminated a HELL of a lot of Russian orcs and vehicles. Oreshnik, in contrast, is a modern day missile system. It's also so "good" that Russia has only ever fired it once. I'm not impressed. The Oreshnik also is an intermediate weapons system. ATACMS is SHORT range system. Comparing the two is idiotic. You are essentially comparing a near-intercontinental missile with a missile that can fire as far artillery only. And again, ATACMS has inflicted FAR more losses to Russia. Russia destroyed almost nothing with the Oreshnik, it's so damn expensive they can't afford to fire it again.
American jet fighters to tanks and missile and missile shield ( thaad) are all good but the ongoing war has proven that Russians weapons are more superior to US.
LOL You must of been watchin Putin TV for news. Putin claiming he shot them down means they were destroyed by the target they were aiming for. They took out Russian oil refineries and 5 missile defence systems in one day LOL. HIMARS is 45 years old and about to be retired PRSM is coming by the end of the year. Russsia should be able to shoot down the odd one in then year 2075. The Russian soldiers were terrorized for 2 years by 8 HIMARS with short range missiles. The US could have sent 500 HIARS instead of 8 with missiles that go 300km instead of 80km. NATO countries send virtually none of the weapons they currently use. The weaponry they do send are 40 year old customer models that they downgrade the electronics, taretting systems, electronics etc. Even those 40 year old outdated model tanks with downgaded armor, electronics and targetting systems last several times longer on the battlefield than Russia's brand new tank that Putin called "the best in the world" 🤣 Russia didn't even destroy most of them were lost tofriendly fire. also all but one of the tanks were salvageable and that one was a friendly fire incident. Also the crew survives virtually every time to fight another day unlike Russian tanks where the crew gets launched into the stratosphere. Also Russia has lost over 8000 tanks compared to 30 Abrams. Even the Bradlys took out a couple brand new T90s. Even 40 year old downgraded customer models last several times longer on the battlefield than even Russia's best tank. Also the US would never use it's tanks in groups of 1 or two. They would use them in colums with dismounted infrantry protecting them looking for hidden enemies, mines and anti tank guns.They also would have US jets bombing everything on the battlefield at will. Russia couldn't even fight this type of war against NATO or the US. Everything Russia had on the battlefield cold be picked off at will by their air force. Andd don't say the Russian air force would do anything at all to stop them. 4 days and the US would control all of Russia's airspace. Russia doesn't even have enough A50s left to protect it's border with Rssia. The US would send planes coming from all different directions since they have bases everywhere 9 aircraft carriers and hundreds of refueling planes. Russia wouldn't even know an attack was underway un;ess they seen the jets but would be powerless to stop them and wouldn't even be able to do anything other than reort their current direction approx altitude and speed. Even their direction wouldn't mean much because they often don't take a straight lime to their target when over enemy territory
That's not the full story tho tbh, the reason we are "selling" / "giving" all these systems to Ukraine is because they have a use by date, normally we would use those weapons in large scale mock wargames and exercises, but as we had a chance for a good old fashioned fake proxy war we saw a chance to own Ukraine by giving them billions in old weaponry, the stuff they are using doesn't represent the latest and the best. All it does mean now is that the West own Ukraine, well, what's left of it after Russia deliver the final death blows in this fake war.
HIMARS is 45 years old. They took out 5 Russian missile defence systems and 2 oil refineries in one atack yesterday. 45 year old about to be retired US junk still better than brand new Russian weapons. Also if the US were fighting it has like 1000 himars not a few. it would literally be firing hundreds of missiles at once Russia wouldn't even be able to fire 1 missile for every hald dozen atacms that were launched minimum. 8 HIMARS literally terrorized Russian soldiers for 2 years. And that was with missiles that go 80km. The US could have sent hundreds of HIMars missiles that go 300km instead of 80km. Those HIMARS alone would have beaten Russia. Any Russia troop not killed would have been fleeing in terror. The US will have them by years end. Russian missile defence systems won't be able to stop those in 50 years either. Not that Russia will even be a country in 5 years. Russian weaponry is pretty much garbagr. Ukraine had only 5% of the equipment Russia has no artillery improper air defences 45 year oldd hand me down down armored customer model weapons with downgraded electronics and targeting systems. Still better than Russia's newest weapons. Russia was bragging because it manages to destroy a couple 40 year old down armored tanks when Russia lost 8000 tanks and even Russia's newest tank was geting destroyed by US Bradley troop transporters. 40 year old NATO customer tanks lasted several times longer on the battle field than any Russian tank. And their crews didn't get launched into space when hit. Russian tank crews become cosmonauts. Most of the NATO tanks were destroyed by firendly fire and were salvageable and the crew would be unharmed. Russian crews were cooked alive if anything larger than a 5.56mm hit them
Agree - and they will keep on losing more with Trump at the helm (even if he might help tone down the US war effort, the guy is so outrageous that he provokes anger and scorn from much of the rest of the world, not least from Europe and Canada).
You want to know who's winning or losing? Ukraine and Russia are losing. Both have lost an entire generation of fine young men. If you call that winning, then you are a sick war monger.
ATACMS are 45 years old and about to be retired. Seems to me Putin is lying again since atacms destroyed 5 Russian missile defence systems and 2 oil refineries in one attack. Putin claims he shot them all down then the nextday threatens nuclear war over their use while flames at Russian refineries reach 400 eet tall. But that was a couple more Russians carelessly smoking right? Russian missile defence systems only good for shooting down Russian jets.
I thhink Russia needs more lessons atacms destroyed 5 Russian missile defence systems and 2 oil refineres in one attack yesterday. Aso HIMARS is 45 years old and is about to retire this year PRSM is ready. Russia is only 50 years behind.
I am sure with India and China helping Russia overcome sanctions they're air defense will quickly advance as they obtain the latest technology and materials!!!
Should have used them on the front lines but Ukraine don't know how to run a war. All they try to do is escalate it and get more countries to join the fight they started.
Ukraine has almost bankrupted the world's number 2 suoerpower 10 times their size that had literally 20 times more weaponry and equipment. Russia is going to go broke by fall if the war continues and by next summer if it ends. Ukraine took out 5 Russian missile defence systems and 2 Russian oil refineries in one attack yesterday. Taking out the two things Russian can least afford to lose tanking out 12% of Russian refining capacity. 12 more percent than they have already destroyed. Which pretty much ends Russia's ability to fund the war using oil profits since it can hardly supply itself now and has no way to make fuel for thwir fighter jets. Russia won't even be able to fight a city after this war let alone a country. If the Ukrainians had 20% of Russia's equipment they would have won the war in 4 months.
🤣yep! The Russian S-400 systems are even more deadly than most people think. There is the possibility of this system destroying all attacking USAF aircraft trying to break defenses even high altitude B2 or B1.
@@Schurkie505ok long range missiles cant be tracked by s400 ? Its simultaneously track and lock on many targets , looks like u know s400 from us yt channels😂
@@CloudCloud-fi6uq up to 72 missiles can be guided at once, and up to 2 missiles per target at Mach 14, with a limit of Mach 15... even the s300 system can stand off f35s and f18s as "israels" last attack on Iran proved, they were locked onto before they even made to to Iranian airspace... the s400 system is a significant improvement over that, the s500 is a further improvement ( also has an track, lock and firing system that is 7-9 time faster than the s300 and 2-2.5 times faster than the s400 system , and now they are working on a improved version of the s500 called the s550 which is designed to be able to target anything that flies, beit hypersonic missile, stealth jets even satellites (which the s500 already can do).
Pretty sure no one was helping Ukraine on 24 February 2022 and the first few days after. Those were the days Russian needed to succeed in order to win this "Special military operation"
By the russian law all the 4 partially occupied regions(Luhansk, Donetzk, Zaporozhia and Kherson) and Crimea are parts of the Russian Federation, so Russia's been attacked by these missiles for a long time. No changes by this approval at all.
Andreyaleksanndrovich1707 @ Sasa wewe unaniandikia kwenyi luga yenu. Mimi sio ukraina 🇺🇦 au mu Rusi 🇷🇺 Mimi ni mtu 🇨🇩 Andika kwa kingereza au kifaransa
LOL Himars is 45 years old and about to be retired. PRSM is ready. HIMARS still better than anything Russia has. Yes Putin clais he destroyed them all. Then the next day he threatens the west with nuclear war over their use. Seems to me Putin is lying which he always does of course. Yesterdays attack took out 5 Russian missile defence systems and 2 oil refineries in one attack. Knocking out 12% of Russia's refining capacity and 100% of Russian capacity to make fuel for it's fighter jets.Taking out the 2 things Russians can least afford to lose. Yes Russian missile defence systems destroy a atacms missile by sacraficing their antire defence system like 15 million minimum for each missile they destroy. Great strategy. Soon Russia will only have enough missile defence systems to protect Putin's house.
La Russia ha un efficace sistema industriale di stato, che garantisce innovazione non dettata esclusivamente dal profitto, ma dalle esigenze difensive della nazione.
All very true. But please don't call a refurbished F-16 or an ATACMS missile "advanced". Ukraine only gets outdated and low-tech hardware from the US ...EXCEPT: Patriot, Stinger, Javelin, and a couple other specific items. And there are a few items in a gray area too, like a handful of refurbished M-1's which are up to a semi-modern version standard. Mid-block-version F-16's and ATACMS aren't "advanced". There are definitely some exceptions, but for the most part the US strongly prefers sending Ukraine stuff which is either expired (ordinance expires), or stuff which the US doesn't think are useful anymore (obsolete). There's a lot of PR-spin around the stuff being sent to Ukraine, so that people will think Ukraine has _actually_ received 200 billion worth of military aid. When really most of it is Monday's doughnuts being gifted on Wednesday.
@@SnakePliskin762 Well "the west" is kinda broad. Most EU NATO countries have ridiculously small stockpiles of munitions. So when they gave aid, they really tapped out their reserves. That's considerably less true for the US. Yes the US is building new munitions hand over fist, but then they're sending Ukraine ordinance which is dealt from the bottom of the deck.
@kathrynck only according to YT they're small. Defence spending has went through the roof in the last 3 years on them. 3 factories built in the US alone last year. That ordanance was taking up space for the new to come in,for example the ATACMS and Javelins etc.
That is what we being made to believe. These are weapons that being in the inventory for ages, now they are realising that they are not a match for advanced technology nation like Russia.
🎉Masy'Allah Allahuakbar Permudahkan urusan kami semuanya aamiin 😊😊Gaza coming home 🏡 to 🔥 USA 🇺🇸 Blame Libya, Vietnam Syria Lebanon Sudan China Russia 🎉😊
@@notaskirt7210 they captured jack shit honestly, since 2023. Most of the captured land is from early in the war. But the attritional warfare isn't about territory anyways.
Nah this chanell is so pro Russian. I am not against Russia myself, yet this chanell overexaggerates the information and does not cover negative things happening in the battlefield
How far!? Depends on Kiev military support from others... International Public eye will be focusing to other issues ... And Superpowers will find a common ground FINALLY... Only Little PEOPLE will suffer because politicians decisions!
indeed, as far as the morally bankrupt cynical war profiteers in DC can push it. Russia only responds to escalation, despite having - Obama himself publicly admitted in 2015 - escalatory dominance in the region, since it's it own freaking border.
Long time follwer of this channel, i unsubscribed like 2 months ago due to new vids being just another US propaganda outlet, I know better channels for that matter, got this vid in my feed by chance and i'm glad, its back to show the other angle. Subscribed again.
Thank you so much for this amazing video! I have a quick question: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (air carpet target dish off jeans toilet sweet piano spoil fruit essay). How can I transfer them to Binance?
Russia is OP !!!!! Lets goooooooooooooo its time to say it!!!! YOU F AROUND YOU FOUND AOUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Russia will never forget !!!!!!!! LETS GOOOO a lot of support from Poland to Russian brothers!!! WE support Russia Polish people are not dumb!!!!!
Good on you mate - but let's not forget that a significant portion of the "foreign mercenaries" that have fought, and are still fighting along the nazis, are your countrymen :(
La Russia non sta usando tutta la sua potenza non nucleare perchè non vuole eccedere contro i cugini ucraini. Esempio non ha usato almeno un paio di Oresnik su Kyev. non ha mai bombardato i ponti sul Dnyper, al contrario degli Ucraini contro il ponte di Kerc.
Kinda funny that they used ATACMS xd. At around 11:56pm when I heard SPAAs working (Stary Oskol, the most farthest city away from Ukrainian border in Belgorod Oblast) I thought that was vampire missiles at the time, since Ukrainian Armed Forces usually use those to strike Belgorod Oblast. Afterwards, I found out that it was ATACMS. I heard like 4 launches and 2 explosions, so I assume over my city they intercepted 2 of those, though I have no idea. I can tell that 8/8 ATACMS were shot down as there's no hits on the infastructure. Kinzhal and Iskander-M, Kh-101 and Kh-35, Kalibr and Kh-32, perform a bit better. Patriot failed to detect Su-57 (production most likely, not to be mistaken with prototype of Su-57, called T-50, it doesnt have bolts. For those who'll say that it has bolts, then look at prototype YF-22, any prototype will have bolts). By all times they intercepted not more than 10 Iskander-M, and afaik, there's other new version of Patriot air defence in Ukraine, that can be used only by American operators. Kinzhal and Kh-101 are kinda easier to intercept, Iskander-M is harder. Kh-101 flies at low altitude of around 100-200 meters at sub-sonic speedб having electronic warfare and ability to use flares and small RCS of 0.01km squared, yet possible to shoot down; Kinzhal flies at high altitude and with high speed, it can be intercepted for example, 10 seconds before it hits something; Iskander-M is similar to Kinzhal, but due to special construction of its missile, due to it having abilities to dodge and make false radio signals, due to high speed of around 6 mach, active manueverability and high altitude of around 50 km, its harder to intercept that than ATACMS or Kh-101 or the same Kinzhal. That's why there's low amounts of Iskander-Ms being intercepted by all time. ATACMS is indeed hard to shoot down, but its possible, as if it would be HIMARS, that can be shoot down by Pantsir-S1. Against ATACMS, for example, S-350, Buk-M2 or Buk-M3, Tor-M3, S-400, Pantsir-SM are most likely to intercept ATACMS. After the first uses of ATACMS in Crimea for example, in 2024 summer, or the same strikes in November as mentioned in video, Russian air defence kinda learnt how to intercept those, and what they have to do for it. Of course, nor US, nor Ukraine, nor Russia, nor any country in the world can garuantee 100% shot down of all missiles launched, especially when it comes to hypersonic missiles, like the same Kinzhal. There's a way to shoot those down, but you have to look around to find out!
I understand why Ukraine, a poor country, needs other countries to "donate" artillery ammo, missiles, and drones, so it can continue the war effort, but why does Russia need the same?
Russian S-400 + pantsir proved being an unbeatable air def set. I was wandering why had ukraine stopped its LRM attacks against russia until I saw the remains of ATACMS fuselages recovered after interception. how many chips and pc boards has ukraine donated to russia so far?
and you have enough of everything to attack the whole Russia of course but you are showing your superiority by failing to win even a 1.7% of Russia's territory (Kursk) for a second time. Do you know how stupid people like you sound?
The US supplied 500 ATACMS to Ukraine. There are now less than 50 left, the others having been a complete failure. Russia deploys 21st technology against US weapons developed in the 1980s. The outcome is both predictable and inevitable.
Proof that state owned is the way to go , it is not about money but national pride , slaves in profit to shareholder setups have much less pride in their work.
Maybe Ukraine shouldn't waste US taxpayer funded, million dollar missiles on non-military targets over the border but rather against Russian military targets within their border. But since the targeting is performed by US intelligence agencies I guess we can't blame the Ukrainians for wasting missiles.
Сша могли бы перехватить Искандер. Но наверняка плакали бы, если б Россия поставила их Мексике и запускала по США с территории этой страны. Развивай логику, мальчик. Это полезно
Russia's war technics wîl be studied in schools around the globe for many years to come! How can 1 country stand tall against 34 Western ultra armed countries?
It's standing against Ukraine a much smaller country. 😂 Russia is the one that got b* slapped for months now.
We are already looking at you and laughin. The bully in not as strong.
Because it's 34 Western adversaries are W⚓s
Look atthe size of those countries, europe is tiny compared to Russia
it's not a globe
You only need to see the video of the Oreshnik arrival to understand.
The speed and no surface explosion tells you what happened.
Everything underground in that huge area was turned to dust.
Russia needs many Oreshniks. In which they don't have.
@@theswede6807у нас много лопат и стиральных машин так что не переживай 😂
They only penetrate 40 feet US has bombs that go way deaper.
@Metoo3232-pu2wc That's nice....bombs are dropped from a plane so you would first have to fly a plane to your target......the Oreshnik is ballistic missile that cannot be intercepted by US technology, and it can carry nuclear warheads.
So what is your point?
@@Metoo3232-pu2wc They weren't armed with explosives. They can carry conventional and nukes, or be used purely as a kinetic weapon.
It should be said, that ukraine cannot target bryansk without american satelites and american personal operating the HIMARS system. Thus ukraine is not doing this, but america wich makes them directly involved. Wich is exactly what putin warned for. And this is why oreshnik was launched. This channel got it wrong.
The whole world knows that the war is between US and NATO against Russia.
The whole world is afraid of big zionist Bully USA.
No ome is afraid of Russia or Putin anymore. People don't even listen to Putin's red lines anymore. He is the boy who cried wolf with the nearly bankrupt paper bear.
So what Russia can go home anytime and stop attacking innocent countries. Not even China recognizes the land Russia stole as Russian.
This is a western propaganda channel. Alex. Moet jij toch ook weten.
It was NATO not Ukraine who launched the Nato missiles, NATO de facto has declared war against Russia
If that is true, why doesn't Russia attack NATO? What is your "de facto" based on? Whimsical beliefs?
@@theswede6807 WW3, think and use your head... Russia is smart not to be provoked into ww3.
@@theswede6807 dude if russ attack nato. nato can go to war against russ go learn
Its simple the battle field that Nato chosen is Ukraine
@@pinkpirat. it is not an answer to the question, it is a repetition. Everybody knows what you wrote, except the fools
Russia can't be defeated
RUSSIAN 💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪
why cant they defeat ukraine??
@@jnisharThey never wanted to defeat them, do you know how to play chess? Definitely not, checkers would be perfect for you!🤣
Russia is fake, error 404 country. putin underestimated Ukraine, it's people and ukrainians' technological abilities. Russia will NOT win this war. No chance!
Ce n'est pas L'Ukraine que les russes combattent mais l'OTAN et ses proxys .
Bravo RUSSIAN ❤
Z!
ATACMS destroyed 2 oil refineries including the only one that Russia had producing fuel for their fighter jets yesterday and 5 missile defence systems in one day. A few more days like thatr Russia won't have gas or missile defence systems. Bravo Russia indeed you have shown you are incapable of stopping a 45 year old weapon being used in very tiny numbers like 1 50th what a NATO atacms attack would involve.
ATSCMS destroyed 2 Russian oil refineries and 5 missile defence systems in one day. The two things Russia needs most. It cannot even rebuild the refineries the American oil companies built them and Putin foolishly stole their assets and kicked them out of the country. Russia doesn't have the knowhow or the equipment needed to rebuild them. One of the refineries was the only one that made fuel for Russian fighter jets LOL. Russia's air force war useless anyways no big loss.
❤
I would not complement war.
Russia can't be beaten and intimidated.
NATO crumbled in Ukraine.
NATO hasn't entered
😅 Russia is crumbling. Half of their tanks destroyed. Air defenses being destroyed. Ukraine destroying targets IN Russia more and more. Oil refinery, destroyed. Drone warehouse, destroyed. Russia is desperate. In a war, they can't win, and no way to save face.
We did not even start yet hahaha.
@@Searching4Reason wake up dude you shit yourself 🤣🤣🤣
Russia is on the verge of economic collapse fighting against the poorest country in Europe that has no navy and no air force and is 1 tenth Russia's size. Putin ruined Russia and set the country back 50 years. Now China will soon take over Russia Yeah Putin sure showed everyone what a complete and utter moron he is.
Ukraine got 500 ATCMS's and they are gone by now. As the system is no longer produced, because of its limitations, this was a cheap decommission of scrap for the US. And as usual it will add to the lend & lease debt Ukraine has to pay for. So instead having costs the US sold heir outdated weaponry to Ukraine.
Generations will have to pay for this debt.
@@hansjorgkunde3772 good teach them to over throw the government in 2014. And you can than the Biden CIA
I don’t think Ukraine will pay it
@@inbuckswetrust7357Ukrainians will.
Well played, Satan, well played, once again.
The US will forgive the debt. Just had to get rid of old inventory. I mean obviously Ukraine will be a vassal state but they won't owe too much. The rest of Europe might come for their piece though
Depending on if the Americans can keep them under control or not
Oh the sad cope about the ATACMS' capabilities...
Comparing them to the Oreshnik is like comparing an F-4 to an F-18...
ah the old oreshnilk bs,a missile so inaccurate it hasn't been used again.
more like f4 to a B2 bro
@@SnakePliskin762 Be that as it may, with a nuclear payload it doesn't matter if it is inaccurate as long as it is impossible to intercept, where things stand now.
The ATACMS was invented during the COLD WAR in the 1980's. For a 40+ year old weapon system, it terminated a HELL of a lot of Russian orcs and vehicles. Oreshnik, in contrast, is a modern day missile system. It's also so "good" that Russia has only ever fired it once. I'm not impressed. The Oreshnik also is an intermediate weapons system. ATACMS is SHORT range system. Comparing the two is idiotic. You are essentially comparing a near-intercontinental missile with a missile that can fire as far artillery only. And again, ATACMS has inflicted FAR more losses to Russia. Russia destroyed almost nothing with the Oreshnik, it's so damn expensive they can't afford to fire it again.
@@fabricosta9488 so basically it's an ICBM,a concept that's been around since the 60s.
ATACMS Missile is total failure! Like M1 Abrams
Nemyslím si
Psst, it was a success. That's why Russia hasn't done any major offensives.
@bl8danjil podle mne mají rusové větší ztráty jak na technice,tak na živé síle
American jet fighters to tanks and missile and missile shield ( thaad) are all good but the ongoing war has proven that Russians weapons are more superior to US.
LOL You must of been watchin Putin TV for news. Putin claiming he shot them down means they were destroyed by the target they were aiming for. They took out Russian oil refineries and 5 missile defence systems in one day LOL. HIMARS is 45 years old and about to be retired PRSM is coming by the end of the year. Russsia should be able to shoot down the odd one in then year 2075. The Russian soldiers were terrorized for 2 years by 8 HIMARS with short range missiles. The US could have sent 500 HIARS instead of 8 with missiles that go 300km instead of 80km. NATO countries send virtually none of the weapons they currently use. The weaponry they do send are 40 year old customer models that they downgrade the electronics, taretting systems, electronics etc. Even those 40 year old outdated model tanks with downgaded armor, electronics and targetting systems last several times longer on the battlefield than Russia's brand new tank that Putin called "the best in the world" 🤣 Russia didn't even destroy most of them were lost tofriendly fire. also all but one of the tanks were salvageable and that one was a friendly fire incident. Also the crew survives virtually every time to fight another day unlike Russian tanks where the crew gets launched into the stratosphere. Also Russia has lost over 8000 tanks compared to 30 Abrams. Even the Bradlys took out a couple brand new T90s. Even 40 year old downgraded customer models last several times longer on the battlefield than even Russia's best tank. Also the US would never use it's tanks in groups of 1 or two. They would use them in colums with dismounted infrantry protecting them looking for hidden enemies, mines and anti tank guns.They also would have US jets bombing everything on the battlefield at will. Russia couldn't even fight this type of war against NATO or the US. Everything Russia had on the battlefield cold be picked off at will by their air force. Andd don't say the Russian air force would do anything at all to stop them. 4 days and the US would control all of Russia's airspace. Russia doesn't even have enough A50s left to protect it's border with Rssia. The US would send planes coming from all different directions since they have bases everywhere 9 aircraft carriers and hundreds of refueling planes. Russia wouldn't even know an attack was underway un;ess they seen the jets but would be powerless to stop them and wouldn't even be able to do anything other than reort their current direction approx altitude and speed. Even their direction wouldn't mean much because they often don't take a straight lime to their target when over enemy territory
Russia's Iskandar missile system has double the range and payload of the ATACMS.
So no country has the ability to stop Oreshnik missiles yet they keep poking the bear ??
us has it, with SM3 block II IA
so now russia can win?
@@fqeagles21 You have not a clu of what you speak. There is nothing currently, from any country, that can stop a hypersonic missle.
@fqeagles21 lol sure they do, you amerimutts always have a excuse for everything.
@@fqeagles21hurrr durrr I'm a dumb american 😂
Another example of outdated and expensive weapons used by nato.
That's not the full story tho tbh, the reason we are "selling" / "giving" all these systems to Ukraine is because they have a use by date, normally we would use those weapons in large scale mock wargames and exercises, but as we had a chance for a good old fashioned fake proxy war we saw a chance to own Ukraine by giving them billions in old weaponry, the stuff they are using doesn't represent the latest and the best. All it does mean now is that the West own Ukraine, well, what's left of it after Russia deliver the final death blows in this fake war.
Love Russia From Pakistan ❤
Ok us slave😂
Tnx from Holland 🇷🇺❤️
Stop discreminate Christian !!!
US junk
USA has boneyard in Arizona and New Mexico. Russian doesn’t have a boneyard.
👏👏👏👍
Nudeland and Harris junks. The others Bidet Sullivan Blinken have no junks at all
@qwertyuiopasdfghjkl9959😂🎉
HIMARS is 45 years old. They took out 5 Russian missile defence systems and 2 oil refineries in one atack yesterday. 45 year old about to be retired US junk still better than brand new Russian weapons. Also if the US were fighting it has like 1000 himars not a few. it would literally be firing hundreds of missiles at once Russia wouldn't even be able to fire 1 missile for every hald dozen atacms that were launched minimum. 8 HIMARS literally terrorized Russian soldiers for 2 years. And that was with missiles that go 80km. The US could have sent hundreds of HIMars missiles that go 300km instead of 80km. Those HIMARS alone would have beaten Russia. Any Russia troop not killed would have been fleeing in terror. The US will have them by years end. Russian missile defence systems won't be able to stop those in 50 years either. Not that Russia will even be a country in 5 years. Russian weaponry is pretty much garbagr. Ukraine had only 5% of the equipment Russia has no artillery improper air defences 45 year oldd hand me down down armored customer model weapons with downgraded electronics and targeting systems. Still better than Russia's newest weapons. Russia was bragging because it manages to destroy a couple 40 year old down armored tanks when Russia lost 8000 tanks and even Russia's newest tank was geting destroyed by US Bradley troop transporters. 40 year old NATO customer tanks lasted several times longer on the battle field than any Russian tank. And their crews didn't get launched into space when hit. Russian tank crews become cosmonauts. Most of the NATO tanks were destroyed by firendly fire and were salvageable and the crew would be unharmed. Russian crews were cooked alive if anything larger than a 5.56mm hit them
American should read the comments. They’ll figure out how much they have lost favor with the rest of the world
Agree - and they will keep on losing more with Trump at the helm (even if he might help tone down the US war effort, the guy is so outrageous that he provokes anger and scorn from much of the rest of the world, not least from Europe and Canada).
You want to know who's winning or losing? Ukraine and Russia are losing. Both have lost an entire generation of fine young men. If you call that winning, then you are a sick war monger.
Z Polski napewno!!! - powinno spotkać ich to samo!
Russia created its own echo chamber I see. Just like old Soviet Union times.😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Russia is powerful,Ukraine unnecessarily fighting with Russia.Ukraine citizens are facing hardship because of Zelenskyy
US Zios control Ukraine government. Ukrainians poors have nowhere to run. They are rounded up and forced to enlist as soldiers.
How menu times to tell???
Oreshnik is not a balistic weapon. It is hypersonic non balistic weapon!!! It can change the flight path any time.
American made military equipment, is under preforming, and way over priced.
ATACMS are 45 years old and about to be retired. Seems to me Putin is lying again since atacms destroyed 5 Russian missile defence systems and 2 oil refineries in one attack. Putin claims he shot them all down then the nextday threatens nuclear war over their use while flames at Russian refineries reach 400 eet tall. But that was a couple more Russians carelessly smoking right? Russian missile defence systems only good for shooting down Russian jets.
The USA have trained Russia in destroy there weapons 😂
I thhink Russia needs more lessons atacms destroyed 5 Russian missile defence systems and 2 oil refineres in one attack yesterday. Aso HIMARS is 45 years old and is about to retire this year PRSM is ready. Russia is only 50 years behind.
I am sure with India and China helping Russia overcome sanctions they're air defense will quickly advance as they obtain the latest technology and materials!!!
India china north korea iran is major allaince of Russia.
So....Russia cannot build anything anymore, they NEED China and India to accomplish anything?
Good eye, Scooter!
You still live in the "Russia is backwards" world? Far from it.
@Bhubankumarsorry bro i dian stand for non ally movementChhetri
@@BhubankumarChhetri they are heavy weight lifters
Sempre con la grande popolazione Russa un popolo dei migliori con grande capacità e umiltà vera unica sempre da sempre per sempre
They are the people that Allah will raise in honour above other people according to Quran.
The glaring difference is ATACM belongs to hardened genocides perpetrators USrael while S400 belongs to defender of humanity, Russia.
Sempre con il più grande Presidente Putin unico al mondo con grande capacità e umiltà vera unica sempre da sempre per sempre
Should have used them on the front lines but Ukraine don't know how to run a war. All they try to do is escalate it and get more countries to join the fight they started.
Comes from a backyarder, expertise. Why are you not on FOX News? 🤡🤣🤣
@@theswede6807 well obviously he works for the other networks. that are all propaganda.
Ukraine has almost bankrupted the world's number 2 suoerpower 10 times their size that had literally 20 times more weaponry and equipment. Russia is going to go broke by fall if the war continues and by next summer if it ends. Ukraine took out 5 Russian missile defence systems and 2 Russian oil refineries in one attack yesterday. Taking out the two things Russian can least afford to lose tanking out 12% of Russian refining capacity. 12 more percent than they have already destroyed. Which pretty much ends Russia's ability to fund the war using oil profits since it can hardly supply itself now and has no way to make fuel for thwir fighter jets. Russia won't even be able to fight a city after this war let alone a country. If the Ukrainians had 20% of Russia's equipment they would have won the war in 4 months.
La Russia non è mio nemico. Gli USA si: questo ora l’intero Pianeta pensa realmente.
Russia is not your enemy because they lack the miltary capacity to attack more than one innocent country at a time.
It is not war between UA and RF but war between USA NATO and RF. Aggresive war made in USA.
🤣yep! The Russian S-400 systems are even more deadly than most people think. There is the possibility of this system destroying all attacking USAF aircraft trying to break defenses even high altitude B2 or B1.
They see the stealth target only 50 miles away, long range missles from the B2 or F35 can be lauched before the Russian radar sees them
They have none left. This channel is lying. The drones have destroyed most of the 300 and 400s. Putin has no defence now for when they fly to moscow
@@Schurkie505ok long range missiles cant be tracked by s400 ? Its simultaneously track and lock on many targets , looks like u know s400 from us yt channels😂
course they can.....
@@CloudCloud-fi6uq up to 72 missiles can be guided at once, and up to 2 missiles per target at Mach 14, with a limit of Mach 15... even the s300 system can stand off f35s and f18s as "israels" last attack on Iran proved, they were locked onto before they even made to to Iranian airspace... the s400 system is a significant improvement over that, the s500 is a further improvement ( also has an track, lock and firing system that is 7-9 time faster than the s300 and 2-2.5 times faster than the s400 system , and now they are working on a improved version of the s500 called the s550 which is designed to be able to target anything that flies, beit hypersonic missile, stealth jets even satellites (which the s500 already can do).
'Far more than the Ukraine can handle' ...or NATO incl. the US.
Russia is a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.
Whilst America was engaged in military mis-adventures in the Middle East, Russia was quietly making strides in military technology!
Ukraine has no defense. Someone else does the job in the name of Ukraine.
Pretty sure no one was helping Ukraine on 24 February 2022 and the first few days after. Those were the days Russian needed to succeed in order to win this "Special military operation"
By the russian law all the 4 partially occupied regions(Luhansk, Donetzk, Zaporozhia and Kherson) and Crimea are parts of the Russian Federation, so Russia's been attacked by these missiles for a long time. No changes by this approval at all.
@@somsatxayalat You are right. You think. 😀😀😀
What about ODESSA ? Oh Odesa ! Such an historic country loved by Queen Catherine. Putin will take it back
@@mwambakilima1331 Он же сказал что это русский город. Так что да, вернем.
Andreyaleksanndrovich1707 @ Sasa wewe unaniandikia kwenyi luga yenu. Mimi sio ukraina 🇺🇦 au mu Rusi 🇷🇺
Mimi ni mtu 🇨🇩
Andika kwa kingereza au kifaransa
@ could you translate in English or French please ?🙏
Those attacks were not affected Russia 🇷🇺 military operations. Far more better than US rockets and other weapons.
LOL Himars is 45 years old and about to be retired. PRSM is ready. HIMARS still better than anything Russia has. Yes Putin clais he destroyed them all. Then the next day he threatens the west with nuclear war over their use. Seems to me Putin is lying which he always does of course. Yesterdays attack took out 5 Russian missile defence systems and 2 oil refineries in one attack. Knocking out 12% of Russia's refining capacity and 100% of Russian capacity to make fuel for it's fighter jets.Taking out the 2 things Russians can least afford to lose. Yes Russian missile defence systems destroy a atacms missile by sacraficing their antire defence system like 15 million minimum for each missile they destroy. Great strategy. Soon Russia will only have enough missile defence systems to protect Putin's house.
Without any questions, there is much more than only Oreshnik.
Last year, Russia liberated 4,000 square kilometers of its occupied territories.
About 100,000 remain
According to whom? You?
@@theswede6807 4000-according to the Russian command-they never lie.
100,000 according to Google Maps, and some simple calculations.
Ukraine isn't using ATCAMS, Americans are using ATACMS in Ukraine!
La Russia ha un efficace sistema industriale di stato, che garantisce innovazione non dettata esclusivamente dal profitto, ma dalle esigenze difensive della nazione.
what is the cost of one atacms and one s400 missile?
All very true.
But please don't call a refurbished F-16 or an ATACMS missile "advanced".
Ukraine only gets outdated and low-tech hardware from the US ...EXCEPT: Patriot, Stinger, Javelin, and a couple other specific items. And there are a few items in a gray area too, like a handful of refurbished M-1's which are up to a semi-modern version standard. Mid-block-version F-16's and ATACMS aren't "advanced".
There are definitely some exceptions, but for the most part the US strongly prefers sending Ukraine stuff which is either expired (ordinance expires), or stuff which the US doesn't think are useful anymore (obsolete). There's a lot of PR-spin around the stuff being sent to Ukraine, so that people will think Ukraine has _actually_ received 200 billion worth of military aid. When really most of it is Monday's doughnuts being gifted on Wednesday.
most has gone on building munitions factories in the west
@@SnakePliskin762 Well "the west" is kinda broad.
Most EU NATO countries have ridiculously small stockpiles of munitions. So when they gave aid, they really tapped out their reserves.
That's considerably less true for the US. Yes the US is building new munitions hand over fist, but then they're sending Ukraine ordinance which is dealt from the bottom of the deck.
@kathrynck only according to YT they're small. Defence spending has went through the roof in the last 3 years on them. 3 factories built in the US alone last year. That ordanance was taking up space for the new to come in,for example the ATACMS and Javelins etc.
That is what we being made to believe. These are weapons that being in the inventory for ages, now they are realising that they are not a match for advanced technology nation like Russia.
@@harmonsalmon7739 still doing a job against Russia.
Ukraina is lost, Slava Russia
Since when?
Russia's air defense is constantly on the improve. So dont be surprised when you get to a point where no ATACMS get through.
🎉Masy'Allah Allahuakbar Permudahkan urusan kami semuanya aamiin 😊😊Gaza coming home 🏡 to 🔥 USA 🇺🇸 Blame Libya, Vietnam Syria Lebanon Sudan China Russia 🎉😊
من الجزائر مستعدون للموت من أجل روسيا الحليف الاول لنا نحن مستعدون
Looks like those atacms went really deep... deep down 😂
Russian will win
when??
The Russian Federation is not the Bogeyman, neither are China or Iran.
They’ve been winning
It might not be pretty but it doesn’t matter
Winning is winning
Look how much land they’ve captured already
@@notaskirt7210 they captured jack shit honestly, since 2023. Most of the captured land is from early in the war. But the attritional warfare isn't about territory anyways.
InsyaAllah.
Nah this chanell is so pro Russian. I am not against Russia myself, yet this chanell overexaggerates the information and does not cover negative things happening in the battlefield
Prostě jsou dobrý 👍
That means, enemies of NATO can get now hypersonic weapons to defeat US and other targets.
This was very well done MTV.
SUBSCRIBED!
How far!? Depends on Kiev military support from others... International Public eye will be focusing to other issues ... And Superpowers will find a common ground FINALLY... Only Little PEOPLE will suffer because politicians decisions!
indeed, as far as the morally bankrupt cynical war profiteers in DC can push it. Russia only responds to escalation, despite having - Obama himself publicly admitted in 2015 - escalatory dominance in the region, since it's it own freaking border.
Look what the Zios did to palestinians who helped shelter them from the wrath of the Austrian painter...
@MohdIsaBinGoharRahman So, what!? Long time ago... Don' t You know people have short memory!? Includind " Zios"!?
EU war against Russia with Ukraine meat...
Russia is always Great true saviour of world ❤
May God make it easy for the families of the fallen on all sides of the conflict
Looks like Kiev will expect a make-over....
لم نجد طريقة للوصول لروسيا نريد القتال من اجل روسيا فقد ساعدتنا في حربنا ضد فرنسا
اخوكم من الجزائر 🇷🇺🇩🇿🇷🇺🇩🇿🇷🇺🇩🇿🇷🇺🇩🇿🇷🇺
Slava Russiya 🇷🇺 🎉
Long time follwer of this channel, i unsubscribed like 2 months ago due to new vids being just another US propaganda outlet, I know better channels for that matter, got this vid in my feed by chance and i'm glad, its back to show the other angle. Subscribed again.
Is not ukraines fault that nato “game changer” weapons are so stupidly expensive and crap…compared to Russian weapons made for real war..😂😂
The shovels use GLONASS.
every attack targeted to civilians either in the form of weapons or sanctions, they are not weakening Russia, they are making Russian people united...
Ukraine is nothing before Russia. You can talk about the Us or China or even India if you want to have a match for Russia
The Sarmat satan 2 missiles not yet ?
war is over
i love russia because they keep nature so clean in huge areas and they produced best music!
Thank you.
Nice vídeo. Thank you from Brazil
Thank you so much for this amazing video! I have a quick question: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (air carpet target dish off jeans toilet sweet piano spoil fruit essay). How can I transfer them to Binance?
The russian new S-500 will change the game❤
Hypersonic Avanguards ?
Ukraine was a punching bag for Russia from day one
Unlucky Russia that debri is always falling on the target
That wasn’t Oreshnik @2:30
RUSSIA IS VERY VERY STRONG!!!!!😁😁😁
Rossiya!!!!!
facts tell quite a different story!
this is a pro-Russia channel with Russian narrative. What do you expect?
Russia is OP !!!!! Lets goooooooooooooo its time to say it!!!! YOU F AROUND YOU FOUND AOUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Russia will never forget !!!!!!!! LETS GOOOO a lot of support from Poland to Russian brothers!!! WE support Russia Polish people are not dumb!!!!!
Good on you mate - but let's not forget that a significant portion of the "foreign mercenaries" that have fought, and are still fighting along the nazis, are your countrymen :(
MortVader, ,a znasz naród bez głupków ?
Тебе самому не смешно 😂, поляки за Россию. Да 1е в очереди со странами Балтии "Сделать Россию снова маленькой ".Если не уничтожить полностью.
what a load of bs
After f-16? Are they still trying to lie about taking down an f-16? How embarrassing
Зверям за океаном надоело жить🤕
La Russia non sta usando tutta la sua potenza non nucleare perchè non vuole eccedere contro i cugini ucraini. Esempio non ha usato almeno un paio di Oresnik su Kyev. non ha mai bombardato i ponti sul Dnyper, al contrario degli Ucraini contro il ponte di Kerc.
It's because Oreshnik is limited and still in experimental stage
apparently Russian missiles identify as a bird. a fast bird that targets commercial airlines.
Kinda funny that they used ATACMS xd. At around 11:56pm when I heard SPAAs working (Stary Oskol, the most farthest city away from Ukrainian border in Belgorod Oblast) I thought that was vampire missiles at the time, since Ukrainian Armed Forces usually use those to strike Belgorod Oblast. Afterwards, I found out that it was ATACMS. I heard like 4 launches and 2 explosions, so I assume over my city they intercepted 2 of those, though I have no idea. I can tell that 8/8 ATACMS were shot down as there's no hits on the infastructure. Kinzhal and Iskander-M, Kh-101 and Kh-35, Kalibr and Kh-32, perform a bit better. Patriot failed to detect Su-57 (production most likely, not to be mistaken with prototype of Su-57, called T-50, it doesnt have bolts. For those who'll say that it has bolts, then look at prototype YF-22, any prototype will have bolts). By all times they intercepted not more than 10 Iskander-M, and afaik, there's other new version of Patriot air defence in Ukraine, that can be used only by American operators. Kinzhal and Kh-101 are kinda easier to intercept, Iskander-M is harder. Kh-101 flies at low altitude of around 100-200 meters at sub-sonic speedб having electronic warfare and ability to use flares and small RCS of 0.01km squared, yet possible to shoot down; Kinzhal flies at high altitude and with high speed, it can be intercepted for example, 10 seconds before it hits something; Iskander-M is similar to Kinzhal, but due to special construction of its missile, due to it having abilities to dodge and make false radio signals, due to high speed of around 6 mach, active manueverability and high altitude of around 50 km, its harder to intercept that than ATACMS or Kh-101 or the same Kinzhal. That's why there's low amounts of Iskander-Ms being intercepted by all time. ATACMS is indeed hard to shoot down, but its possible, as if it would be HIMARS, that can be shoot down by Pantsir-S1. Against ATACMS, for example, S-350, Buk-M2 or Buk-M3, Tor-M3, S-400, Pantsir-SM are most likely to intercept ATACMS. After the first uses of ATACMS in Crimea for example, in 2024 summer, or the same strikes in November as mentioned in video, Russian air defence kinda learnt how to intercept those, and what they have to do for it. Of course, nor US, nor Ukraine, nor Russia, nor any country in the world can garuantee 100% shot down of all missiles launched, especially when it comes to hypersonic missiles, like the same Kinzhal. There's a way to shoot those down, but you have to look around to find out!
Evidently this news doesn't know what an intercontinental is.
Opportunity for Russia to PUT TO TEST ALL NEW ARMS & AMMO IT'S DEVELOPING...
I understand why Ukraine, a poor country, needs other countries to "donate" artillery ammo, missiles, and drones, so it can continue the war effort, but why does Russia need the same?
:10 Why are Ukrainians on the beach, when their country is at war?!?!?
the west sadly mistaken , by underestimating Russia militarily capabilities .
I doubt the ATACM was designed to operate in isolation and the Ukraine military is ineffective in the use of these missiles.
Russian S-400 + pantsir proved being an unbeatable air def set. I was wandering why had ukraine stopped its LRM attacks against russia until I saw the remains of ATACMS fuselages recovered after interception. how many chips and pc boards has ukraine donated to russia so far?
Nonsense Russia is to big to defend and doesn't have enough air defense to cover all its airspace.
They dont need to. If it will go as far that they have to worry about moscow they go Nuclear
and you have enough of everything to attack the whole Russia of course but you are showing your superiority by failing to win even a 1.7% of Russia's territory (Kursk) for a second time. Do you know how stupid people like you sound?
In saying that, you are being egregiously misinformed, and seriously mistaken.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
How's the, 'Special Military Operation ' going chaps?
Don't forget Jaming too is to take out the rocket
The US supplied 500 ATACMS to Ukraine. There are now less than 50 left, the others having been a complete failure. Russia deploys 21st technology against US weapons developed in the 1980s. The outcome is both predictable and inevitable.
Proof that state owned is the way to go , it is not about money but national pride , slaves in profit to shareholder setups have much less pride in their work.
NATO CIA EU USA direct involvement in this war, makes Russia happy to test it's technology against West woepons.
Maybe Ukraine shouldn't waste US taxpayer funded, million dollar missiles on non-military targets over the border but rather against Russian military targets within their border. But since the targeting is performed by US intelligence agencies I guess we can't blame the Ukrainians for wasting missiles.
So how does the US withdraw from this war, as they so often do? Let the Talibans rule Ukraine? Or the Shah?
Nato stays for nothing impressive 😅. Russia is still beating the shit out of their pants...
If Russia can intercept U.S. ATACMS then why the hell are they crying so much if the U.S. is supplying Ukraine with them..? 🤣
Сша могли бы перехватить Искандер. Но наверняка плакали бы, если б Россия поставила их Мексике и запускала по США с территории этой страны. Развивай логику, мальчик. Это полезно