Japan’s SLIM moon lander touched down on its nose! See lunar robot imagery
Вставка
- Опубліковано 24 січ 2024
- A ball-shaped robot called LEV-2 ("Lunar Exploration Vehicle-2") also
known as SORA-Q, captured an image of the Smart Lander for Investigating Moon (SLIM) after it was deployed. The lander touched down on its nose. Full Story: www.space.com/japan-slim-moon...
Credit: Space.com | imagery: JAXA/Takara Tomy/Sony Group Corporation/Doshisha University | edited by [Steve Spaleta]( / stevespaleta ) - Наука та технологія
Beautiful and congratulations to japanese scientists love from india 🇮🇳
Any chance the two rovers could team up to push the lander over.
I was thinking the same. Give it a nudge 😂
I'm sure on the Moon it wouldn't take much. Just a little nudge................and...........there we go.
@@youtube.silenced.mimagine how cool that'd be, low gravity robots fighting
If it turns on then you probably don’t want to mess with it 😂
landed upside-down, still able to communicate, op🤩. great work engineers
It's to be designed to have a legs in all the four sides and tilt after landing to the correct position.
First high resolution close image of lunar regolith surface with dust ever taken by any country. Japan achievement is impressive.
Engine fell off before landing.
Read the actual story.
Dismal failure.
@@outlawbillionairez9780setbacks are setups for comebacks. Japan will land on the moon. And they will do it right side up
@@outlawbillionairez9780umm... engine bell(s) plainly visible in pic?
China already did it and packed some dust for home too
@@outlawbillionairez9780 It fulfilled it's mission success criteria...so I would assume that it's a success?
Beautiful 😍
there is a massive difference in the tone and texture of the foreground vs the background ,,
the only thing missing is mothra ! ! darn japanese sci-fi movie set !
but mission accomplished ! they never said it would land right side up ! !
Well, they took one hell of a picture. It's framed nicely. The yellow color... just pops there.
Looks great.
If that's all they get out of the mission... Win, in my book!
They could always say that they were able to get the moon to land on top of their rover.
If you zoom in on the gray area in the so called hills back there and take a magnifying glass you can see the structure they were actually looking at. Dont look at the photo look into the photo 😉
I wonder if they tried firing any of their guidance thrusters to try to flip it over. If there is any fuel left why not give it a try? What they hell do you have to lose?
Help me I’ve fallen and I’ve can’t get up.
😂😂😂😂😂
It’s successfully landed on the moon but upside down only.
Maybe next time, they'll use retros to control descent instead of dropping it 20 feet and hoping it doesn't bounce wrong.
I'm sorry...but that's pretty hilarious...I can't stop laughing..like my sister trying to paraller park.. 🤭😂
I love how people were already posting on the internet” Japan liner mission has failed. It made me so mad, I was like have faith in Japan
Who made the pictures btw?
The one that shows the lander were from the rover
Dont just stand there taking pictures, push me over!
There is no gps/reference/scale/lat/long.....Idk what to set my Telescope to.
Amazon prime ship...waiting on my scope....hello?!
Kind of gives a new meaning to "sticking the landing".
Absolutely amazing to see this on another world! Despite how it landed, it is still the pinnacle of human achievement.👍👍👍🧡
What about the Mars lander?
@@jacobkopp1239 definitely!👍
Looks so fake don't believe everything you here🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
"Pinacle" lmfao
Maybe one day they'll land a human being on it right side up lmao
@@bringbacktheoldnormal1614 And why is it fake? Other than 'it looks fake'
Looks like an upside-down R2D2.
Broken, a piece of junk
Looks fake
@@bringbacktheoldnormal1614 It does come across as fake. Not so unusual these days.
@@dougaldouglas8842 because it is and all the dummies think its real.
Was measuring the surface gravity any part of planned experiments? Would be interesting to know. Anyone?
They Cud have Put Up Solar Panels on Atleast 2 Sides. Like Chandrayaan 3
着地後の姿勢が計画より180度ひっくり返っている、一本着地で、そのまま腰を据えようとの計画であったが、地球と月の引力の差が計算出来てなかったのではないか、と思う一本着地の反発が地球より大きかった事が原因では無いか？
言っておくけど上側は足じゃないよ。横向き姿勢で着陸する機体ですし、これは逆さじゃなく、前向きに90度つんのめってる姿勢ですからね？
足が上で頭が下になってると思い込んでる人が多いですね。
Must've put the batteries in upside down
What hope? Assuming all the solar panels are facing the surface, what difference does it make how much sunlight is available
It's hard to see in the shadows, but solar panels are not facing the ground. Like the camera, it is oriented horizontally. If the sun shines from the west in the future, there is a possibility of charging.
This is what happens when a country pulls all the resources together for a common cause Godspeed, Japan
Nonsense
Someone leave out a few lines of code in that landing program? Hmmm….
❤💯
Still better than Luna-25.
no luna or anything were on the moon...
@@smalcerz01 Im sorry but being dumb at that point is kinda sad
@@Paep50 your talking to me? Look for these luna boilers...
日本のネット界隈ではきちんとした姿勢で着陸しなかった事と、太陽電池での発電が出来てない事で批判だらけです。
対照的に海外ネットでは称賛コメントが溢れててすごく不思議です。
世界はあなたが思っているよりもはるかに同情的です。それは単なる失敗であり、いつも起こることです、インドより愛をこめて。 😊
55 years...so long , why never even 1 rover send back to " APOLLO LANDING SITE " ???
That's what thrusters are made to cure :-D
Lander should have had Wider Legs to land correctly..?🤔
SLIM lander landing tecnique is pretty strange, it wanted to land on it's side
Bring back some rocks
Drinking and landing lunar modules is not suggested...
Sure it did.
i don't know the decision to come sideways and land on one side and tip into place is just so odd , there had to be a better option than that
SPACE IS HARD !!! DON'T BE DISCOREDGED @JAXA!
OMG the facts are fantasy 😖 I just can't take another Children's moon story
Lawn dart.
For a long time, it will probably be talked about not as the fifth country to successfully land a probe on the moon, but as the first country to land a probe upside down on the lunar surface.
Moonsault 9,99
ようやく月か
So, who took the photo?
The lander had rovers on it, the rovers detached seconds before the landing, so that's one of the rovers that took the photo.
Geez just can’t fix stupid
The discrepancy was something NASA did not want us to hear 😂.
Japan was set up to prevent NASA from making mistakes beforehand 😂.
The rover
Looks like the work of q few bored college students that couldn't find a Volkswagon Beetle. 😅
😂 ulta kue hai ? Why up and down
उतरते वक्त इसका एक एंजिन बंद होगया
\ /
looks good to me ! 😁
KSP rules😂
No worries. A little moon dust and wind will tip it back onto its natural center of gravity, and all will be good again. Just wait.
This landing position wasn't that problematic at all
Always got have something blurred out in moon pictures 🤔🤔🤔
There should be an American flag up there.. right? 😅😅
Or... It landed in a different part of the Moon
Fakery at it best I say 😆😆😆😆
lol. !!!!! It was looted by the George Floyd crowd.
@@bringbacktheoldnormal1614 The previous reply explained it all. It was in a different place. It's like asking me if I should be able to see Paris from London. Not to mention that there are something called hills and craters
You think NASA not only landed on the moon but got all the men back safely with 1960s technology? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! I can't believe anyone still believes that bat shit 🤣
ले सर के बल गिरा लैंडर
So we are told, so we are to believe. The recording device was deployed without being switched on, had it been we would have seen it deployed. Why not switch it on. The thing on the screen looked like a piece of junk
I'm open minded but also how in the hell were they successful in deployment of the drone when it wasn't designed to upside-down? What are the odds of that working out and it getting this pic??
It's like they added the pink pixels to convince.
@@ziggylycans Do you mean the two rovers? They are LEV-1 and LEV-2. They were deployed by ejecting them to the ground seconds before landing. They can maneouver independently. Also, a drone wouldn't work as the moon doesn't have an atmosphere for propellers to work.
@@ziggylycans Well put. It just does not come across as right, and as you say the drone should not, could not have been deployed, and the machine it is looking at appears damaged where it should not be damaged, on the side
@@ziggylycans First, they deployed a rover, not drone and second, they were deployed seconds before the landing.
Hollywood still imagery. We simply do not believe your lies.
And any proof?
@@Haz0052-tu7rr Im pretty sure he simply belives it's fake, if he have "a proof" then it's gonna be one hell of the dumbest comment of all time.
Then why do you keep watching? Go back to your "space not real, earth is flat" echo chamber. You bring nothing to this table.
@@Paep50 Very true. Before, I used to post explanations on why moon landing etc. must be true, but I honestly can't be bothered, after basically every single one either never replied, said something like 'It's silly sci-fi fantasy, you must know that deep down' etc. (never actually responding to my points) or state ridiculously false 'proofs' (e.g. "Why does NASA never land anywhere interesting. I have seen clouds, ruins, cities and vehicles on the moon, so why don't they ever show it. ." - This is based off a real comment, who claimed to have seen all those thing btw.)
😁 kein wunder haben die kein solar Strom
diese Sonde hat sich 90 grad zu viel gedreht bei der Landung 😁
podvod :D
China: live video all the time and deployed a land rover.
India: partial live video and deployed a land rover, but became a sleeping beauty.
Japan: no live video, upside down landing but threw out an camera to send image back
All success! No comment.
Nonsense
India rover completed mission then, gone sleeping mode. It is calculated.winter in moon south pole is extreme and only india landed on south pole
@@indiansaresuperioralienrac3615 Yes, with US data link.
@@charleshu6367 why all Chinese filled with fake news, pretty sad that they are fools.
😂
Fake pic.
AIで、普通の姿(お尻が下の方)の写真にしてください。
言っておくけど上側は足じゃないよ。横向き姿勢で着陸する機体ですし、これは逆さじゃなく、前向きに90度つんのめってる姿勢ですからね？
Pretty impressive , but if it really landed, on it's side what took the picture. Hummmm
The rover that was on that lander
@@Cresign hmmm pretty good rover if it can climb down a nearly upside down vehicle
@@user-um5dj5cy8b It was literally tossed out (Two of them) during the final seconds of descent.
@@Haz0052-tu7rr yeah, ok
Looks top heavy too me bad design shame
The lander is made to land by side, that's why it looks kinda diferrent. Now the thing is that it landed on the wrong side so solars panels aren't receiving any power, but thanks to time the sun changed places days later and so, the battery were powered back
Still saying poor design must take in account of landing wrong side up which it did
🤣🤣🤣🤣
So 2024 state of the art technology can't get it right with an unmanned craft yet sheep still believe NASA took men to the moon and got them back safely in 1969 and in all subsequent missions 🤣
But the SLIM mission was a succes, what do you mean?
🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️
@@Paep50 Did you see the landing?
@@johntate5050 Are you serious? So you make an entire world saying that every single landing mission are fake without knowning them and your proof is "did you see the landing" ?
@@Paep50 Another brainwashed sheep
When I was young (20+ years ago), we were repeatedly told that public moon missions would be affordable. Now in 2024.. we have lost that technology and it's a painful process to believe these !d!iots
Rovers exited the SLIM and leave no tracks? They always forget the details.
Rover uses Magnetic Polarization Dampening to float, not drive, across lunar surface.
@@123kbkgraphx JAXA website make no mention of floating above the lunar surface but demos show it leaving a trail behind. But thanks anyway!
Fake
Nice Digital photo... mwhaha
They can go all the way to the moon but they can't get the European colonizers out of their country? 😮
Ludicrous comment
That's some horrible CGI. Look at that spaceship,🤣🤣🤣
Not successful
All the rovers worked in a nominal way and the lander did menaged to get it's power back
Aren´t the solar panels on top of the lander?
If so, how to use them when the sun comes around again?
They need power during the 2-week-long night.
@@LordDustinDeWynd Yeah, I get that, but can they unfold the panels now?
@@vajnis As I understand it, fixed panels on one side.
@@LordDustinDeWyndOkej, thanks! 👍
@@LordDustinDeWyndAs I understand this entire thing is a bunch of bs. How can you people believe this other than you want to?
Japan literally fell and couldn't get up 😂
Looks like a fake pic
What you talking about? All those missions(Venus,Mars,Moon,etc) are fake as this picture.
@@panteaflorinwho took the pic? Why do telescopes see buildings but they dont show us pics of that? The ground has no color, but the ship does? Duh they show you a pic of it on the moon but how could they get that shot? Also the background is so out of focus. Another gov space agency con job.
@@jacobkopp1239 Which telescopes have seen buildings? Got any pics?
@@jacobkopp1239You're not into cameras, are you?
@@LordDustinDeWynd it all over. Get out of the govs ass and youll see. Theres a bunch of people filming the moon always. Where have you been?
Japan just wasted some money
c.g.i
😂