*All Radeon 890M/Ryzen AI HX 370 Tests:* ua-cam.com/play/PLqVHurHrK3FhWpyfU84FAQW0hJ0jj7EgZ.html Recorded with external capture device: Real FPS 0:00 Tomb Raider (2013), 1080p max 1:01 Resident Evil 6, 1080p max 2:03 Hellblade, 1080p high 4:04 Cyberpunk 2077, 1080p low 4:50 God Of War, 1080p "PS4" Vivobook S16 M5606WA AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 at 17W cTDP Radeon 890M iGPU 32GB LPDDR5X-7500
To avoid complains about a higher AMD cTDP (despite ARC running mostly at max GPU clocks), I've reduced the HX 370's cTDP from ~60 Watts to 17 Watts. The overlay is scalled differnently, resolutions are the same for both GPUs/recordings
Not only a huge fps difference, those frame times are so much more consistent on the Ryzen APU. I’m shocked Intel still hasn’t got their drivers in a better state.
With the same setting, my Ultra 5 125H in 20 watts is giving 40 FPS in this area and Lunar Lake is coming with 40% to 50% better performance in iGPU and has 25% better single core than my ULTRA 5 125H.
With the same setting, my Ultra 5 125H in 20 watts is giving 40 FPS in this area and Lunar Lake is coming with 40% to 50% better performance in iGPU and has 25% better single core than my ULTRA 5 125H.
This is crazy either of them can even run these sort of games now whether it's decent or just ok because it's only going to get better in the future. Soon my toothbrush will be able to run crysis lmao. Oh ya and this must be really good for battery life too. Imagine in 5 years when these igpu are even better and use less power and hopefully we actually have better battery technology in mainstream electronics like good solid state batteries. Maybe could actually game on laptop on battery for 10+ hours that would be crazy.
Can you please repeat this test with equivalent laptops for consistency? Like the Zeyphrus G16 GA605 (Ryzen 9 HX 370 + LPDDR5X-7500) and G16 GU605 (Core Ultra + LPDDR5X-7467)?
Are you serious? You’re comparing a Core Ultra from the 7 series with an AMD from the 9 series. Naturally, AMD is more powerful, which is why Ryzen is also more expensive. The Ultra 7 should be compared to the Radeon 780M, where there’s virtually no difference.
I wish I got the 890m and hx 370.. such an incredible chip pushing windows deep into macbook territory. However I settled for the intel 185H because in my country the AMD was 47% more expensive 1700 vs 2500 on average for the same laptop. Thats totally ridiculous. Oh well. Geforce Now baby
@@g00dl00kinb0i you can replace RAM on the Intel system and it is a major difference on those already bandwidth starved iGPUs. This comparison is totally worthless.
With the same setting, my Ultra 5 125H in 20 watts is giving 40 FPS in this area and Lunar Lake is coming with 40% to 50% better performance in iGPU and has 25% better single core than my ULTRA 5 125H.
![[Bad] - YouTube ВСЁ? (победа VK и прощание с подписчиками)](/img/n.gif)
*All Radeon 890M/Ryzen AI HX 370 Tests:*
ua-cam.com/play/PLqVHurHrK3FhWpyfU84FAQW0hJ0jj7EgZ.html
Recorded with external capture device: Real FPS
0:00 Tomb Raider (2013), 1080p max
1:01 Resident Evil 6, 1080p max
2:03 Hellblade, 1080p high
4:04 Cyberpunk 2077, 1080p low
4:50 God Of War, 1080p "PS4"
Vivobook S16 M5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 at 17W cTDP
Radeon 890M iGPU
32GB LPDDR5X-7500
To avoid complains about a higher AMD cTDP (despite ARC running mostly at max GPU clocks), I've reduced the HX 370's cTDP from ~60 Watts to 17 Watts. The overlay is scalled differnently, resolutions are the same for both GPUs/recordings
Great attention to detail! Thanks for the research and testing.
This one clarification earned a sub. Good job.
Not only a huge fps difference, those frame times are so much more consistent on the Ryzen APU. I’m shocked Intel still hasn’t got their drivers in a better state.
Edit - except for Hellblade. No idea why the Ryzen is oscillating so consistently at the beginning. Weird.
With the same setting, my Ultra 5 125H in 20 watts is giving 40 FPS in this area and Lunar Lake is coming with 40% to 50% better performance in iGPU and has 25% better single core than my ULTRA 5 125H.
And it uses only 17 watts, it powers 12 big cores (4big 8 slightly smaller but still big with lower frequency) and 16 CU iGPU with only 17 watts
Crazy.. Hellblade was almost double fps. Good job amd :)
With the same setting, my Ultra 5 125H in 20 watts is giving 40 FPS in this area and Lunar Lake is coming with 40% to 50% better performance in iGPU and has 25% better single core than my ULTRA 5 125H.
@@HDRPCmy vega 8 still outperform most intel igpu
@@Mr.NothingM at what power?
@@Mr.NothingM lunar lake next month on 3rd September
@@HDRPCi think the lunar lake is trash 😅
twice the frames at half the power shouldnt be possible
Shintel magic
it is not possible by AMD good, but it is possible by the bad of Intel.
This is crazy either of them can even run these sort of games now whether it's decent or just ok because it's only going to get better in the future. Soon my toothbrush will be able to run crysis lmao. Oh ya and this must be really good for battery life too. Imagine in 5 years when these igpu are even better and use less power and hopefully we actually have better battery technology in mainstream electronics like good solid state batteries. Maybe could actually game on laptop on battery for 10+ hours that would be crazy.
The AMD CPU is in a class if its own!
well lunar lake just launched and it seems it will run circles around both old intel and AMD
17w is like one lamp lul, still can game
Can you please repeat this test with equivalent laptops for consistency?
Like the Zeyphrus G16 GA605 (Ryzen 9 HX 370 + LPDDR5X-7500) and G16 GU605 (Core Ultra + LPDDR5X-7467)?
Do you know how expensive that would be
@Chiii. Or he could just ask Asus or some retailer to borrow one for testing like other reviewers in exchange for a free sponsor spot?
how about for archicad, whos better?
There's no comparison.
The Intel 155H can barely compete with the 6800U (worse with Xbox360/PS3/Switch emulation), let alone AMD's latest 2 gens.
Are you serious? You’re comparing a Core Ultra from the 7 series with an AMD from the 9 series. Naturally, AMD is more powerful, which is why Ryzen is also more expensive. The Ultra 7 should be compared to the Radeon 780M, where there’s virtually no difference.
>28W? 40W? 60W?
can you read the title?
@@nempk1817 thankyou I don't know why the entire video is this ">28W" label displayed. He should write a ">0W" label.
I wish I got the 890m and hx 370.. such an incredible chip pushing windows deep into macbook territory.
However I settled for the intel 185H because in my country the AMD was 47% more expensive 1700 vs 2500 on average for the same laptop.
Thats totally ridiculous. Oh well. Geforce Now baby
how much memory did you share for the igpu?
the iGPU can take up to 16GB if needed. Both were at 512MB
Intel's drivers need some serious fixes. In almost all titles the gpu usage is lower and cpu usage higher than AMD’s. Especially resident evil
It's only 17 watts....
intel processor sucks, power hungry, and too expensive but we still need intel so that AMD wont become NVIDIA, which selling overpriced parts
X2 fps at half power
IGPU Ryzen APU good performance
WASTED!
Useless and biased comparison with that memory configuration alone: LPDDR5X-7500 for AMD, 6400 for Intel.
You do realize that is what the laptops come equipped with ?!
1100Mhz more on Intel is NOT going to make up the difference you see anyway.
@@g00dl00kinb0i you can replace RAM on the Intel system and it is a major difference on those already bandwidth starved iGPUs. This comparison is totally worthless.
Yeah, the laptops still came with what they came with.
I hate twats complaining when they can't do any better...
Cry more shintel
With the same setting, my Ultra 5 125H in 20 watts is giving 40 FPS in this area and Lunar Lake is coming with 40% to 50% better performance in iGPU and has 25% better single core than my ULTRA 5 125H.
ohhh c'mon....everybody knows that Lunar Lake is DOA ...
@@marshabrightly1307 no. Just wait and see.
For RTX 50 gaming laptops Arrow Lake is coming.
@@marshabrightly1307he's a fanboy, let him cry
intel is all talk, no performance
@@paneledp AMD is shenanigans. Only shenanigans.
AMD is Only lies and only fake marketing.