Amy Coney Barrett Asks Trump Lawyer Point Blank About Prosecution Of Presidents Ordering Coups

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 кві 2024
  • During Thursday’s oral arguments in Trump v. United States, Justice Amy Coney Barrett questioned the attorney for Former President Trump D. John Sauer about impeachment.
    Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
    account.forbes.com/membership...
    Stay Connected
    Forbes on Facebook: forbes
    Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
    Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
    More From Forbes: forbes.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,2 тис.

  • @hondo1650
    @hondo1650 Місяць тому +449

    America is hanging by a thread

    • @Ont785
      @Ont785 Місяць тому +13

      If that’s the case, it’s doing far better than every other country.
      It’s refreshing to actually hear the arguments and the system working .
      Canada is already doomed.
      There is no checks and balances, and once you’re in power, it is absolute .

    • @JuggoJuggo
      @JuggoJuggo Місяць тому +9

      @@Ont785 Pierre Castro as dictatoe for life, good god help Canada.

    • @franksullivan1873
      @franksullivan1873 Місяць тому

      These people in the Halls of Congress are pushing its citizens to submit or fight for their rights.Those are the only options and they seem indifferent to what must be chosen .If we submit they kill us slowly,if we fight back they kill us quickly.What has happened to USA?Even Donald Trump is fighting this nonsense while in peril and his only crime is questioning the authority of the power elite ,who control the media and the courts in many of our major cities.A little guy like me doesn’t stand a chance in this society anymore.

    • @michaelmcclurg9698
      @michaelmcclurg9698 Місяць тому +1

      Our forefathers were very smart when they designed & structured our government to have checks & balances built in to limit any one branch or person from attaining absolute power & control.They had experienced living under a totalitarian tyrannical government in Europe & they knew that a time might occur when ONE PARTY would try to force a ONE PARTY RULE SOCIALIST COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT by bastardizing the rule of law, subverting the constitution & more.

    • @jota55581
      @jota55581 Місяць тому +6

      The funny thing is You guys You think the President calls the shots .

  • @rustycastleberry5567
    @rustycastleberry5567 Місяць тому +174

    Listening to this just made me wanna clear my throat every 10 seconds.

    • @juanitachristner5009
      @juanitachristner5009 Місяць тому +7

      That voice should disqualify her/him. Truly. It's painful to listen to. And a distraction.
      (Is it a her? Or a him?)

    • @MrMentaliamorphic
      @MrMentaliamorphic Місяць тому +4

      @@juanitachristner5009 its a him lol and just be glad you dont have that voice, don't judge just feel grateful xD

    • @Joshpower57
      @Joshpower57 Місяць тому +2

      ​@MrMentaliamorphic
      Eh, judgements allowed. This case shouldn't be happening.

    • @1024det
      @1024det Місяць тому +1

      That voice is the only voice of reason attempting to save this country from making a president obsolete.

    • @1024det
      @1024det Місяць тому

      Also a powerless president will forever empower the deep state which lurks in all those agencies of the executive branch. They will keep growing in power and any president that dares to oppose them will get imprisoned.

  • @markphillips898
    @markphillips898 Місяць тому +133

    What a dolt! The impeachment clause applies to any impeachable person.

    • @bigfoot-id8bv
      @bigfoot-id8bv Місяць тому +9

      But the executive branch is the president, therefore he can not be prosecuted until he is removed from office, even then the question remains, were his actions taken as official duties.

    • @jeffashcraft2388
      @jeffashcraft2388 Місяць тому +7

      Tell that to Schumer

    • @v12tommy
      @v12tommy Місяць тому +4

      But the president has the ability to pardon, and the president nominates the attorney general. Therefore he or she cannot be prosecuted until you remove them from office, thereby eliminating the conflict of interest.

    • @williammoseley17
      @williammoseley17 Місяць тому +4

      @@bigfoot-id8bv He can be Impeached not criminally prosecuted.

    • @user-xq9yg8ei5e
      @user-xq9yg8ei5e Місяць тому

      In Trumps case, he was impeached to remove him from office and not because he committed high crimes and misdemeanors. That's why he wasn't convicted.

  • @jamesfeatherstone3140
    @jamesfeatherstone3140 Місяць тому +100

    Why in the world are we still chasing this stupidity. How much more money do we need to spend on this joke.

    • @kellykiser7600
      @kellykiser7600 Місяць тому +10

      But but but they got him this time……

    • @jamesfeatherstone3140
      @jamesfeatherstone3140 Місяць тому +4

      @kellykiser7600 OH, and this is what they said last time, and last time, and last time and well you get it right.

    • @sandrarufus8198
      @sandrarufus8198 Місяць тому +1

      @@jamesfeatherstone3140 Who Are They?????

    • @herecomesforego1787
      @herecomesforego1787 Місяць тому +3

      Cult

    • @kellykiser7600
      @kellykiser7600 Місяць тому +10

      @@jamesfeatherstone3140 No they mean it this time!! I saw it on The View and CNN and my blue haired co worker with a dozen piercings said this time they really got him.

  • @pantrofl
    @pantrofl Місяць тому +177

    That attorney really has an unfortunate voice lol

    • @danielabilez3619
      @danielabilez3619 Місяць тому +23

      He sounds like he has been smoking cigerettes and drinking whiskey since he was twelve years old!

    • @captdread2013
      @captdread2013 Місяць тому +17

      Did you hear the other one? Sounds like he/she/it/them/they has/have been drinking soyjizz lattes every morning for decades.

    • @tobiaschislom9876
      @tobiaschislom9876 Місяць тому +6

      @@danielabilez3619 Sounds like he’s gargling whiskey as he speaks.

    • @MG-rg3jo
      @MG-rg3jo Місяць тому +26

      RFK like....

    • @davidlaing7684
      @davidlaing7684 Місяць тому +14

      He and Kennedy should get together and drive us all crazy. Do they have hearing aids to filter out the noise.

  • @Wrathofkala
    @Wrathofkala Місяць тому +394

    Except for Mayorkas right - he can't get impeached.

    • @joeysdream7166
      @joeysdream7166 Місяць тому +34

      Talk to Schumer about that. That trial didn't happen because of him.

    • @wahstomper
      @wahstomper Місяць тому

      No reason to impeach someone who hasn’t committed hi crimes and misdemeanors, you were just fooled by the trump show.

    • @liberty5069
      @liberty5069 Місяць тому

      He can't get convicted by the Senate. He was impeached in the House.

    • @DrHuxley-
      @DrHuxley- Місяць тому +9

      🎯

    • @markkozlowski3674
      @markkozlowski3674 Місяць тому

      He WAS impeached. The impeachment was dismissed by the Senate.

  • @dave47ish
    @dave47ish Місяць тому +221

    The Constitution gives Congress the right to impeach and the Senate the right to investigate and press charges. But the Senate should not have a right to just throw it in the trash can as they did recently I feel that's obstruction of justice in the Senate whoever's involved should be investigated and censored or impeached

    • @GoGoPeanutable
      @GoGoPeanutable Місяць тому

      They did it because the impeachment is a total sham!

    • @mattn6685
      @mattn6685 Місяць тому

      You're a little off here. The House makes impeachment charges, the Senate holds the impeachment trial. Historically, no Senate has outright dismissed all charges sent by the House for impeachment. What Schumer did in the case of Mayorkas, whether you like him or not, was unprecedented. But these aren't your parents' Democrats anymore; they're closer to CommieCrats...rules/laws do not apply to them!

    • @michaelmcclurg9698
      @michaelmcclurg9698 Місяць тому +5

      Yes totally agree

    • @amercanmade2685
      @amercanmade2685 Місяць тому +8

      They voted just like a Jury would.They did nothing wrong but because they didn't vote to remove Trump did not make them wrong. Just you did not agree.

    • @orbnitsky
      @orbnitsky Місяць тому +1

      ...and all the dirty laundry exposed to his employers, We The People

  • @hopeanyastroud9573
    @hopeanyastroud9573 Місяць тому +284

    Why are people acting like we can't read exactly what our Founders and Frameworkers set forth in our 3 separate branches of government and the power of We the People are to govern ourselves...we are literally having troubles because government has gotten too big and bloated, time to strap government back into its chains which is our Constitution.

    • @Lizabitch
      @Lizabitch Місяць тому +14

      Did you actually pass 8th grade civics?

    • @hemihead001
      @hemihead001 Місяць тому +7

      People want to believe what they read agrees with them and pretend that what the Constitution says agrees with them .

    • @jamescarter8311
      @jamescarter8311 Місяць тому +21

      @@Lizabitch Did you?

    • @Hham51
      @Hham51 Місяць тому +1

      Absolutely

    • @Lizabitch
      @Lizabitch Місяць тому +2

      @@jamescarter8311 yes, and law school
      Now sit down and be quiet

  • @charleslanphier8094
    @charleslanphier8094 Місяць тому +105

    Everyone equal under the law. We fought a war over this.

    • @scotthorning1180
      @scotthorning1180 Місяць тому +8

      We fought a lot of wars over that… looks like we are still fighting.

    • @jamescarter8311
      @jamescarter8311 Місяць тому +21

      The idea of a court in NY or Georgia deciding a federal election is absurd. Yes, Presidents should have immunity. Presidents are on a global stage.

    • @sandrarufus8198
      @sandrarufus8198 Місяць тому +15

      @@jamescarter8311IMMUNITY FOR WHAT EXACTLY???? CORRUPTION????

    • @user-qx2tk4sq9b
      @user-qx2tk4sq9b Місяць тому

      ​@@sandrarufus8198like biden? They have immunity from bogus indictments from a corrupt president like biden.

    • @reneem3895
      @reneem3895 Місяць тому

      @@sandrarufus8198Funny no other president ever needed total immunity until that grifting, habitual liar, sexual predator came along.
      I bet no one would be okay with Pres Biden having immunity.

  • @jimhealey9013
    @jimhealey9013 Місяць тому +60

    Wow what a bunch of BS

  • @judymclean6677
    @judymclean6677 Місяць тому +83

    What’s with the voices of these lawyers??? The prosecution sounds like a chipmunk and this dude sounds like he’s gargling gravel.

  • @user-ft1xf8wk9m
    @user-ft1xf8wk9m Місяць тому +14

    THANKS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @ronaldvaughan4176
    @ronaldvaughan4176 Місяць тому +16

    We have forgotten what our Liberty means to each and every one of us.Having heart standing in gap for our family and friends. We desperately need to get it back. Times are getting tough out there. Good jobs are hard to find. I thank God for our family and friends and the Liberty and the heart He gives us everyday.

    • @lileos2837
      @lileos2837 Місяць тому +2

      Liberty is not possible without unity. Join the purple party. Slogan? Not a party. Let's bring God back unto the constitution in a way that the godless will jump to vote and the religious freedom we cherish will be strengthened. I think it's possible and will strengthen our union too. We need a sense of community back, one that is truly free for everyone

    • @togglebutton3312
      @togglebutton3312 Місяць тому

      Are you living in Jamaica? The last Jobs report was gangbusters! Stock market is on an 8 year HIGH! WTF are babbling about?

  • @RJTruthBTold
    @RJTruthBTold Місяць тому +122

    Amy asked what was important. No impeachment. No crime. No conviction.

    • @Leaky223
      @Leaky223 Місяць тому +3

      Thank you for the simple breakdown. ❤

    • @MLeone2010
      @MLeone2010 Місяць тому +22

      Nixon, no impeachment, pardoned. Why a pardon if no conviction in the Senate?

    • @jrstf
      @jrstf Місяць тому

      @@MLeone2010 - I'm not saying the pardon was valid but the purpose was to shutdown the attempt to prosecute a president so as not to damage the country further.

    • @lostnlove2309
      @lostnlove2309 Місяць тому

      What he’s saying is completely ridiculous. Especially since the leader of the Republican Party did not vote to impeach because he said the criminal justice system should handle it. So they won’t impeach because they want the justice system to handle it. That’s what Mitch McConnell said. The lawyer was right. Mitch McConnell would’ve been wrong saying that we the majority know he was not wrong.

    • @StanfordRappaport
      @StanfordRappaport Місяць тому

      hey Mr. RJ TRUTH, trump was impeached, of course, and his own lawyers said he shouldn't be held accountable in impeachment because if he committed a crime, he could be indicted in criminal court AFTER impeachment. (Amy says that here). And now they are saying he's immune. Didn't you get that she's calling him on this??

  • @rickybobby7276
    @rickybobby7276 Місяць тому +103

    The more Amy challenges him the more he gets an opportunity to present his case. I love it.

    • @ericcallender1575
      @ericcallender1575 Місяць тому +20

      It's hilarious, he's exempt from criminal charges and impeachment must be a gateway to criminal charges, .. that he's exempt from... word salad..

    • @douglemay7989
      @douglemay7989 Місяць тому +5

      Crimes are now funny?

    • @ericcallender1575
      @ericcallender1575 Місяць тому +9

      @@douglemay7989 no, the boldness of the kangaroo SCOTUS is.

    • @rickybobby7276
      @rickybobby7276 Місяць тому +2

      ​@@ericcallender1575 Impeachment is a means to remove the president if he's doing anything wrong. Laws after all are a guideline that congress elected by the people have the ultimate say on. Congress could eliminate the supreme court and interpreter of laws if they choose. Congress determines what law and crimes are. Congress doesn't need anyone to interpret law for them. You are trying to deflect from the fact that the president gets immunity and at anytime he can be removed by congress unlike a Monarch or dictator.

    • @ericcallender1575
      @ericcallender1575 Місяць тому

      @@rickybobby7276 the President gets immunity from some things, not total immunity, or else he could murder anyone. Also, it wasn't President tRump, it was candidate tRump, that's why the government did not pay for all the fake trials and investigation into supposed election fraud. Good try though.

  • @lindahughes2289
    @lindahughes2289 Місяць тому +9

    I hate fast talkers. And his voice.is.horrible. I need this in writing!

    • @SteveEdwardCooper
      @SteveEdwardCooper Місяць тому

      If you haven't already, tap the title of the video, then tap the Show Transcript button. I sometimes have to do that to follow people who talk too fast or have grating voices....or in this case, both of those problems.

  • @salmonjason4470
    @salmonjason4470 Місяць тому +121

    I didnt realize Marge Simpson was one of Trump's lawyers.

    • @user-ly9hm6lv2v
      @user-ly9hm6lv2v Місяць тому +16

      I'm for Trump, but that is funny 😂

    • @NfidelNet
      @NfidelNet Місяць тому +11

      More like Patty or Selma but yeah

    • @rr4298
      @rr4298 Місяць тому +5

      Ohhh homie

    • @DoctorHemi
      @DoctorHemi Місяць тому +2

      😂

    • @billedwards4285
      @billedwards4285 Місяць тому +3

      TRUMP 2024!!!…. Yes it sounds like Marge 😂

  • @lukeb5153
    @lukeb5153 18 днів тому

    It is terrifying how intelligent and classy Justice Barrett is. We are lucky to have her.

  • @jasonford8962
    @jasonford8962 Місяць тому +23

    Mr Sauer needs to lay off them damn cigs.

  • @user-ln3fx5ri1e
    @user-ln3fx5ri1e Місяць тому +25

    Exactly, what coup....

    • @JCB171
      @JCB171 Місяць тому +5

      The one the DNC has been working on for 8 years.

    • @scottinga9819
      @scottinga9819 Місяць тому +5

      Jan 6

    • @lileos2837
      @lileos2837 Місяць тому +2

      I think they are referring to the one when they were going to hang that guy.
      ua-cam.com/video/stkRp_tQfJg/v-deo.htmlsi=_NBse7X4GQU_lMB7

    • @diannes3302
      @diannes3302 Місяць тому

      Yes, the democrats performed a coup on Jan 6.​@scottinga9819

    • @togglebutton3312
      @togglebutton3312 Місяць тому +1

      You know...the one where they stormed the capital and beat cops almost to death. The one were fake electors tried to pose as the actual electors in several states all directed by the likes of Navaro. The one were Trump tried to get a governor to "find" 11,000 some odd votes...you know...that coup.

  • @alandeltoro6437
    @alandeltoro6437 Місяць тому +4

    Glass of water, please, must have water

  • @mkklassicmk3895
    @mkklassicmk3895 27 днів тому

    There is no way the SCOTUS is gonna decide that he has sweeping immunity.

  • @randychestnut6591
    @randychestnut6591 Місяць тому +3

    Never underestimate the profound wisdom and vision of our Founding Fathers. America has been a successful republic because of the Constitution and establishing this government on laws.

    • @aleuttrel2260
      @aleuttrel2260 29 днів тому

      Unfortunately maga doesn't like the system our forefathers gave us...

    • @sarahcline8488
      @sarahcline8488 28 днів тому +1

      Unfortunately they twist the constitution to help Trump. He should have banned from taking office because Trump started the Insurrection. It states clearly in black and white.
      Anyone who is involved in an Insurrection is forever banned from taking office. But some how they got him out of it stating it didn't apply to him.
      What a bunch of bs

  • @starseedenergy996
    @starseedenergy996 Місяць тому +71

    What about cia led coups as in many places including Ukraine in 2014

    • @scott8xxx532
      @scott8xxx532 Місяць тому +9

      100% irrelevant to the issue at hand.

    • @starseedenergy996
      @starseedenergy996 Місяць тому +11

      @@scott8xxx532 presidents can’t do coups single-handedly…the cia does and has done this

    • @scott8xxx532
      @scott8xxx532 Місяць тому +5

      @@starseedenergy996 still irrelevant to the issue at hand.
      we can name all sorts of crimes (allegedly) committed by presidents, or with presidents knowledge and involvement, over the years. but they don't need any more examples.
      the point of this case is whether or not the president has immunity from crimes. they already have a few examples they're using, they don't need any more, much less an exhaustive list. they're on to exploring and debating the underlying arguments for and against such immunity.

    • @starseedenergy996
      @starseedenergy996 Місяць тому

      @@scott8xxx532 the title of video is immunity from coups not crime in general. That is what I am referring to.

    • @sandrarufus8198
      @sandrarufus8198 Місяць тому +3

      @@scott8xxx532 A PRESIDENT DOES NOT HAVE IMMUNITY FROM CRIMINAL LIABILITY OR PROSECUTION!!!! NEITHER CIVIL NOR CRIMINAL IMMUNITY IS EXPLICITLY GRANTED IN THE CONSTITUTION OR ANY FEDERAL STATUTE!!!!

  • @RyanInterceptor
    @RyanInterceptor Місяць тому +2

    I wouldn’t want to ask this guy questions so I wouldn’t have to listen to that voice.

  • @user-fc4lc2fp5e
    @user-fc4lc2fp5e Місяць тому +30

    The speed at which he speaks and his raspy voice is distracting at best

    • @arod077
      @arod077 28 днів тому

      I do not like the voice but I understand everything he is saying.

  • @cindyleonard9724
    @cindyleonard9724 Місяць тому +5

    Amy’s not the sweet woman she pretended to be.

    • @BillMcGirr
      @BillMcGirr Місяць тому +1

      Most times I meet a “sweet woman” I automatically assume that it’s a front…
      Once out of sight and behind closed doors…
      Some man is going to pay the price.👍🥃

    • @BizznessBox
      @BizznessBox Місяць тому +1

      No one with a law degree is a sweet person.

  • @johnknighton2621
    @johnknighton2621 Місяць тому +54

    Amy getting tough like this with her questions is a very good sign. She’s covering her butt for her ruling/rationale. 5-4 in favor of (Trump) presidential immunity.

    • @douglemay7989
      @douglemay7989 Місяць тому +13

      Good. Joe has Seal Team Six on alert, how many justices need to go?

    • @Graybeard689
      @Graybeard689 Місяць тому

      They won’t vote in favor of absolute immunity, if they do, they won’t be needed anymore

    • @Cslcalico2023
      @Cslcalico2023 Місяць тому +4

      I doubt it. She is too wishy washy. Why does she follow the Constitution in some cases and in other cases it is like she never read it.

    • @Memphis2010GFC
      @Memphis2010GFC Місяць тому

      There is no way they will vote to give Trump total immunity. That means if he gets into office (or any other president) they can commit as many crimes as they want knowing that they cannot be convicted - Dictators do that!

    • @user-jv5cu4hz3q
      @user-jv5cu4hz3q Місяць тому +9

      Absolute immunity would be insane.

  • @brianphillips9152
    @brianphillips9152 27 днів тому

    Presidents should act lawfully.

  • @LynTurner-yz2kn
    @LynTurner-yz2kn Місяць тому +2

    Wow

  • @tgwaste
    @tgwaste Місяць тому +3

    Can they find attorneys that have normal voices?

  • @johnbee4557
    @johnbee4557 Місяць тому +27

    A true judge … AMY YOU ROCK

    • @reneesantiago6496
      @reneesantiago6496 Місяць тому +3

      Why do you say that? Can you elaborate because I’m lost in all of this! Help!

    • @carolynpeisert218
      @carolynpeisert218 Місяць тому +2

      No she doesn't...she is absolutely a Disgraceful Supreme Court Judge 😤

    • @douglemay7989
      @douglemay7989 Місяць тому

      @@carolynpeisert218 You think she is being mean to Stinky?

    • @carolynpeisert218
      @carolynpeisert218 Місяць тому

      @douglemay7989 no, she is not Constitutional and that is the purpose of Supreme Court judges

  • @jeffcolorado
    @jeffcolorado Місяць тому +1

    It sounds like the character actor Percy Helton is arguing in front of the court.

  • @gardiner_bryant
    @gardiner_bryant 27 днів тому +1

    This guy sounds like the most corrupt mob lawyer ever

  • @pinionpuppy4950
    @pinionpuppy4950 Місяць тому +4

    Because he wasn't convicted from impeachment? As they say - you can indict a ham sandwich and I suppose you could impeachment it, too. But you need a conviction.

    • @logangodofcandy
      @logangodofcandy Місяць тому +2

      No, they say that a grand jury WOULD indict a ham sandwich. Grand juries do whatever the prosecution tells them to do, over 99% of the time. That isn't an exaggeration.

    • @alananderson5929
      @alananderson5929 Місяць тому

      Try again: In California law, the grand jury is an independent body made up of a specified number of citizens of a particular county, whose job is to perform the following functions:
      Determine whether or not charges should be brought against you in certain criminal cases, and
      Inquire into matters of civil concern in the county, such as county officers’ salaries and the budgets and operations of county governments; grand juries are an arm of the court.
      In some California counties, the same jury focuses on both criminal and civil matters.
      When grand juries are used in California criminal casesCalifornia prosecutors must bring felony charges in one of two ways:
      They may hold a “preliminary hearing” before a judge or magistrate, at which you are present and represented by a criminal defense lawyer. If the judge determines after the hearing that there is enough evidence to try you for the crime, then you will be charged through a document called an “information;”9 OR
      They may hold a grand juror proceeding, at which you are not present. If the jury decides that there is probable cause to try you for the crime, then you will be charged through a document called an “indictment.”10
      Unlike a preliminary hearing, grand juries are held before you appear for an arraignment (the first step in the California criminal court process). Hope this clears up some misconceptions. Loved your “more than 99% of the time” quote…now THAT was funny. SF🇺🇸

    • @Memphis2010GFC
      @Memphis2010GFC Місяць тому +1

      The whole idea that you cannot take an ex president to trial if he is not impeached is ridiculous. The senate essentially votes on party lines.

    • @togglebutton3312
      @togglebutton3312 Місяць тому

      @@logangodofcandy Let me guess...unless there indicting a Democrat...right?

    • @StephanieSimmons-fi6ij
      @StephanieSimmons-fi6ij 28 днів тому

      Schumer, Biden, Pelosi, Mayorkis, Ralph nadler should be impeached!

  • @old-gamer-01
    @old-gamer-01 Місяць тому +23

    A lot of words, zero proves, boh!

  • @sibkiss2009
    @sibkiss2009 Місяць тому +4

    This guy could be an auctioneer

  • @Smiler7
    @Smiler7 Місяць тому +1

    Mad house!!!

  • @johntamplin4214
    @johntamplin4214 29 днів тому

    When his throat croaks he’s lying!

  • @BrianPotterProductions
    @BrianPotterProductions Місяць тому +8

    Wow RFK JR showing up for the hearing. Interesting.

    • @JW-iz6mv
      @JW-iz6mv Місяць тому +1

      His voice is getting better !!!

  • @anthonyk6265
    @anthonyk6265 Місяць тому +23

    Is that RFK talking

  • @johngrantham3161
    @johngrantham3161 Місяць тому +2

    Remember all lawyers can go down if not in order with the truth only as that is the way a law works,

  • @paulsmith1411
    @paulsmith1411 Місяць тому +8

    No unlawful order be carried out

  • @user-fm5nf6um7u
    @user-fm5nf6um7u Місяць тому +4

    Has the Supreme Court heard ALL the facts. They should bring in Tucker..hehe.

    • @douglemay7989
      @douglemay7989 Місяць тому +2

      The guy Faux News fired for lying?

    • @BizznessBox
      @BizznessBox Місяць тому

      The guy who does propaganda for Russia? I hear he’s busy filming a special about all of the food and freedom in North Korea.

  • @rjones6219
    @rjones6219 Місяць тому +1

    Is that a voice from the military hospital joke?

  • @quincyjones6382
    @quincyjones6382 Місяць тому +1

    The President IS under the same set of laws as the rest of us! So Mr. Sauer needs to sit down and let the matter at hand settle the issue!

  • @SP-pl8vu
    @SP-pl8vu Місяць тому +23

    Couldn't tell if the Attorney was either Patty or Selma Bouvier

  • @elavips982
    @elavips982 Місяць тому +2

    I thought no one is above the law in America. Looks like cult leaders are 😢

  • @nancykurtz7333
    @nancykurtz7333 Місяць тому +6

    SCOTUS has a hot boomerang in their hands

  • @kathleencochrane9698
    @kathleencochrane9698 Місяць тому +1

    Omg That lawyer's voice is horrific!!

  • @dhlong1697
    @dhlong1697 Місяць тому +8

    Argument falsely presumes that "high crimes and misdemeanors" are statutory.

    • @lileos2837
      @lileos2837 Місяць тому

      I noticed that too... they just sidestepped over it.

  • @CH-gc8hf
    @CH-gc8hf Місяць тому +41

    Amy's not buying into it and that is comforting.

    • @jamescarter8311
      @jamescarter8311 Місяць тому +5

      Amy is wrong.

    • @CH-gc8hf
      @CH-gc8hf Місяць тому +5

      @@jamescarter8311 Not to her. Her opinion matter's.

    • @reneesantiago6496
      @reneesantiago6496 Місяць тому +3

      Buying into what??? I’m lost on all this! Help me navigate which side Amy is leaning!

    • @dcj-bz4on
      @dcj-bz4on Місяць тому +6

      @@reneesantiago6496justice Barrett was not buying Trump’s argument. She was pointing out the ludicrousness of such god like deference to any POTUS or former POTUS.

    • @reneesantiago6496
      @reneesantiago6496 Місяць тому +3

      @@dcj-bz4on So a conservative justice….appointed by Trump is leaning towards stripping his immunity?????

  • @smacdad
    @smacdad Місяць тому +1

    The lawyer sounds like the Droid in Jabba's shop. "You are a protocol Droid, are you not?"

    • @Rationalityislost101
      @Rationalityislost101 29 днів тому

      "These are not the droids you are looking for" -- ok I'll see myself out.

  • @fldon2306
    @fldon2306 28 днів тому

    Marge Simpson’s chain smoking twin sisters Selma and Patty are now Supreme Court Lawyers?!?!🚬🚬😂😂

  • @pantarkan7
    @pantarkan7 Місяць тому +8

    Sadly, I'm getting the idea that the -ginzberts- roberts court does not want Trump to get out of this; that they are on board with keeping him out of the Oval office "by any means necessary".

    • @epicbob123456
      @epicbob123456 28 днів тому

      This is a good thing, is it not? Otherwise Biden could order the assassination of Trump the day he leaves office, and by Sauer's argument, Biden cannot be criminally prosecuted because by the GOP Senate's own rules, a former president cannot be convicted in an impeachment trial.
      No one should be above the law. Donald Trump should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

  • @MrHarlteen
    @MrHarlteen Місяць тому +7

    How do they claim they know what the “framers” meant?

    • @logangodofcandy
      @logangodofcandy Місяць тому +4

      Read the constitution. It's PLAIN English. The same English that people living in trailer homes with a 5th grade education would use and understand. The founders explained that that was the point.

    • @r.mucklin1703
      @r.mucklin1703 Місяць тому +6

      Try Reading "The Federalist Papers". It will tell you exactly what they meant.

    • @brianedminster7556
      @brianedminster7556 Місяць тому +1

      @@r.mucklin1703 Don't forget "The Anti-Federalist Papers" as well. I'd never even heard of these until well after I'd graduated from 'public' school. Gee, I wonder why a public school doesn't even *mention* them? 🤔
      It's not as readily available 'in print' at the Federalist Papers are, but you can get them - they're just pricey. 😕

    • @GripFreak
      @GripFreak Місяць тому

      ​@@logangodofcandy can you post a response without so many fallacies in it? If the framers intent is based on a 5th graders education level then this would also mean that we don't need a supreme court with educations higher than 5th grade. Did you even read your comment before posting it?

    • @lynb2039
      @lynb2039 Місяць тому +1

      ​​@@GripFreakNot at all. Its the CHALLENGES to the framer's intent and language that demands SCOTUS, and its defense and reiteration of same sometimes posed by 5th graders as we've seen recently. We all should be thanking GOD for the establishment of our three branches - not perfect, there's some holes that need patching, nevertheless, the best, safest, system in the world

  • @user-xu4kn1wd8b
    @user-xu4kn1wd8b 29 днів тому

    i have a really hard time to listen to this lawyer of trump his voice is scary

  • @jimpikoulis6726
    @jimpikoulis6726 Місяць тому

    Vs. United States 🇺🇸 🇺🇲

  • @jeffashcraft2388
    @jeffashcraft2388 Місяць тому +6

    Why is supreme court asking what if any damn way. The supreme court is suppose to guard the law and not change the law. Changing the law is by Congress.

    • @lileos2837
      @lileos2837 Місяць тому

      Locke. Supreme Court interprets the constitution. Marbury v madison.

    • @jeffashcraft2388
      @jeffashcraft2388 Місяць тому

      @@lileos2837 yes true but they cant change it without Congress

    • @jeffashcraft2388
      @jeffashcraft2388 Місяць тому

      @@lileos2837 An amendment may be proposed by a two-thirds vote of both Houses of Congress, or, if two-thirds of the States request one, by a convention called for that purpose.

    • @jeffashcraft2388
      @jeffashcraft2388 Місяць тому

      @@lileos2837 the supreme Court can not change the constitution that's why this case and there concerns must go back to lower court and then back to Congress

    • @lileos2837
      @lileos2837 Місяць тому

      Yeah and guess which one we might need....by the people and for the people. And ppl are PISSED! Let's let level heads prevail.

  • @itsthehumidityyall8303
    @itsthehumidityyall8303 Місяць тому +34

    I don’t remember him ordering anything.

    • @markkozlowski3674
      @markkozlowski3674 Місяць тому +7

      "Find me 11,000 votes".

    • @sandersspencer
      @sandersspencer Місяць тому +14

      @@markkozlowski3674 thats not a coup lol. Buy a dictionary

    • @jamescarter8311
      @jamescarter8311 Місяць тому

      @@markkozlowski3674 That wouldn't stand up in any court. It means absolutely nothing. There was massive election fraud going on and Trump had every reason to believe the votes were there. He wasn't demanding they be created. If he were, he would have said it that way.

    • @sandersspencer
      @sandersspencer Місяць тому

      @@markkozlowski3674 now a fake dossier used to try to take down a sitting president, is an attempted coup. You lefties believe too much coming out of your tv. Amazes me there are many on the left that still haven’t been informed the russia dossier was false and proven so 😂

    • @TSXDHLledaArtifacts
      @TSXDHLledaArtifacts Місяць тому +2

      She didn’t say he did, she said IF that were to occur

  • @gentlemandemon
    @gentlemandemon 6 днів тому

    he's gonna cite BORK?? a guy famous for being a bad pick for the Supreme Court?

  • @skyraider1656
    @skyraider1656 Місяць тому +2

    Mr. Sauer sound like he gargles with Drano. Poor man

  • @williamlynch1929
    @williamlynch1929 Місяць тому +13

    That is not what Article 1 section 3 clause 7 of the Constitution says!! It reads...."Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification hold and enjoy any Office honor, Trust, or Profit under the United States; but the party CONVICTED shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgement and Punishment according to law." ....No conviction ny the senate no legal action may ensue, immunity stands!!

    • @bobturnbull18
      @bobturnbull18 Місяць тому +10

      That just states that he is still liable for indictment after being impeached not that he isn't liable for indictment absent of impeachment.

    • @williamlynch1929
      @williamlynch1929 Місяць тому +1

    • @williamlynch1929
      @williamlynch1929 Місяць тому

      ​@@bobturnbull18 Nope!! An impeachment means very little without a conviction by the Senate!!

    • @loon0493
      @loon0493 Місяць тому +2

      😂😂😂 impeachment at it's heart a political process. It is not by nature designed to be a criminal trial. This is why Nixon was pardoned after resigning.

    • @markp7262
      @markp7262 Місяць тому

      Basically what it is saying is that impeachment does not carry jeopardy with it. There are actually five different ways in which a person can be indicted for the same crime without incurring double jeopardy, but none of them are required to indict for any of the others: articles of impeachment, military code of justice, federal law, state law, and international law. Usually you will see a maximum of two used, though it would be interesting to find a crime worthy of indictment on all five levels. (EDIT: I guess tribal law would be a sixth possibility, though I believe that usually falls under the blanket of federal.)

  • @louknowles1789
    @louknowles1789 Місяць тому +25

    Ooh. Asks him point blank! Like the gentleman said, it was unconstitutional to press these charges. I think her answered all her questions with cases to back up what he had to say. Real cases. Not cases made up using ChatGPT.... TRUMP2024

    • @wurzelausc
      @wurzelausc Місяць тому +4

      Would you favour Biden to be indicted for accepting bribes if evidence established that? Or should Biden as president be absolutely immune from prosecution? Lots of Maga people want Biden indicted thus undermining Trump's very own argument.

    • @s1l3ntw1
      @s1l3ntw1 Місяць тому +3

      @@wurzelausc rule for thee, not for me. All these people saying the President can not be held accountable seem to fail to realize that that gate swings both ways

    • @abrakkehakka1357
      @abrakkehakka1357 Місяць тому

      If the POTUS is immune from prosecution just because a later POTUS could persecute him by misusing the DOJ, they seem to miss the little thing that the later POTUS-instead of misusing the DOJ-as also being immune just could send the SEALs to persecute the FPOTUS.

    • @abrakkehakka1357
      @abrakkehakka1357 Місяць тому

      All the following would need to be in line with some DOJ persecution if the POTUS demands so: The AG, the special investigator and all in his team, the Prosecutor and all of his team, the grand jury, the randomly selected Judge, the randomly selected jurors cleared by the defense, and the appellate courts judges… including the highest appellate judges: the SCOTUS justices… since they could always take on a case.
      If one argues that this could ever be the case, one is arguing that the whole Constitutional justice system is very flawed and unsafe.
      And a SCOTUS justice arguing this, is really arguing that the SCOTUS itself is corrupt.

    • @wurzelausc
      @wurzelausc Місяць тому

      @@abrakkehakka1357 Alito is arguing a deep state. I don t understand why they generalised the question - "a president". Why was not the question: "Can this president under these circumstances be prosecuted or not?" Because it is impossible to foresee all eventualities and crazy people.

  • @paulclark5945
    @paulclark5945 Місяць тому +2

    Only applies to your political opponents!!!

  • @NeverMind-vx7pl
    @NeverMind-vx7pl Місяць тому

    What a crock

  • @karlenejoyall6797
    @karlenejoyall6797 Місяць тому +10

    Money and power = corruption

  • @terribowen9295
    @terribowen9295 Місяць тому +63

    There was no coup.

    • @surfrunnerd8457
      @surfrunnerd8457 Місяць тому +17

      Exactly. This lawyer is off base. Trump never attempted a coup. Never attempted an insurrection. He was pursuing election integrity and saw all the chacanery by the Democrats. He saw the vote flipped. He heard reports in Georgia that many Trump votes were not counted. That should be the argument. This attorney also needs to slow down. You don't make your case more effective by speed talking, especially if your voice is not the best quality to begin with.

    • @user-qx2tk4sq9b
      @user-qx2tk4sq9b Місяць тому

      There was a coup. But it wasn't Trump. It was the crime syndicate that is our government and media. They stole our election and installed their puppet biden.

    • @lileos2837
      @lileos2837 Місяць тому +6

      @@surfrunnerd8457 I am hoping this case goes forward so that, if Trump did not attempt a coup, all of America will know it before November. He will get more votes that way.

    • @Article95
      @Article95 Місяць тому +3

      Your evidence being...?

    • @surfrunnerd8457
      @surfrunnerd8457 Місяць тому

      @@Article95 evidence is far too expansive for you tube comments. But I'm absolutely sure you are aware already. But aside from evidence of corruption in 2020 elections, just as in Iran-Contra, Watergate, 9/11, Enron, the biggest clue to corruption is usually in the cover up. The Democrats blocked forensic audits of the Dominion machines, the Democrats have done their best to stifle any probes into election fraud, the Democrats have branded anyone wishing to investigate as election deniers and conspiracy theorists. As for me, if I was elected President with the most votes of any political candidate in U.S. history yet am unable to draw a crowd or any interest in public appearances , and I KNEW the results were legit, I would encourage audits and investigations to clear my name, set history straight, and give Americans confidence in our elections. If I have something to hide I would run in the other direction. "We have assembled the largest election fraud organization in the history of American politics." - Joe Biden
      He made that declaration to his base when he was being severely criticized for not campaigning in 2020. He sent the signal out: it's fixed. No need to worry. I don't need to campaign.

  • @winterwolf354
    @winterwolf354 Місяць тому

    I don't know who is speaking with his throat sounding so raw. It reminds me of Bobby Kennedy. I really like the guy but I can't stand to listen to him for very long. It makes my throat burn and my head hurt!

  • @michaelanderson3096
    @michaelanderson3096 29 днів тому

    Thin line between democracies & dictatorships = Judicial branch of government.

  • @juliebraunschweig2108
    @juliebraunschweig2108 Місяць тому +9

    So far, Jobama Obiden is enjoying complete immunity. Oh that's right! Rules for THEE and all that jazz. Smh

    • @douglemay7989
      @douglemay7989 Місяць тому

      At least Donald is finally seeing the inside of a court room. The worst President in history, responsible for tens of thousands of deaths.

    • @BizznessBox
      @BizznessBox Місяць тому

      What crime did Obama do? Please give me specifics.

    • @markp7262
      @markp7262 Місяць тому +1

      He is not "enjoying complete immunity," as there is still an impeachment inquiry going on. There is a process to go through; you don't just get to skip right to acquittal because it's "your guy" or skip right to conviction because he happens to be on the other side of the line. Trump is going through the same process. If you don't like the way this country works, write your Congressperson and tell them that you want an oligarchy where the other side are second class and hunted for sport.

  • @dv95678
    @dv95678 Місяць тому +12

    Sounds rehearsed - Barrett and Trumps Lawyer we’re ready.

    • @logangodofcandy
      @logangodofcandy Місяць тому +5

      No, it doesn't. You just don't like how that one line of questioning went

  • @patrickradcliffe3837
    @patrickradcliffe3837 Місяць тому

    ACB getting hit with facts not feelings.

  • @lindahughes2289
    @lindahughes2289 Місяць тому +2

    OMG DEVILS

  • @ronaldgartner3700
    @ronaldgartner3700 Місяць тому +29

    I'm not that smart, its hard for me to follow. That's why I hire a lawyer. But i understand why all this B.S. is happening. Trump 2024

    • @erichammond9308
      @erichammond9308 Місяць тому

      Is overthrowing the Constitution he swore an oath to protect and defend a presidential act? No.

    • @stephengarner8628
      @stephengarner8628 Місяць тому

      If Trump wins in 2024 America is finished. If you believe I am wrong then start reading books about how dictators serve one person only. Themselves.
      Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mussolini, Gaddafi, Saddam, and the list goes on.
      The supreme court will end, no dictator has a court that is above them. Wait till the petulant child starts arresting all those who appose him. (His words not mine)
      One day it will be a person you love. That is the day it will be to late. No more elections, because dictators end elections, and end constitutions. Period. (Trumps own words, I will suspend the constitution on day one. I will arrest all my political rivals). Just like Hitler did)

    • @dianarobertson3478
      @dianarobertson3478 Місяць тому

      You want a dictatorship in America???? Are you nuts???? First thing he'll do, is take freedom of speech away, then voting rights, all the benefits you worked you entire life for, and only give you the type of news he wants you to hear, like at his rallies now........all these things are exactly how Putin rules Russia....if that's what you want....go to Russia to live!!!!!

    • @BizznessBox
      @BizznessBox Місяць тому

      Not if SCOTUS decides that the president is immune from prosecution. That means Biden could assasinate Trump and be 100% immune.

    • @user-sf6wc9tr9o
      @user-sf6wc9tr9o Місяць тому +6

      Your whole statement is the evidence supporting your first sentence. Thank you.

  • @EA-pw3br
    @EA-pw3br Місяць тому +24

    Yet the current president cannot be prosecuted because of his poor memory…. Trump should just start forgetting shit

    • @douglemay7989
      @douglemay7989 Місяць тому +1

      He is in mental decline.

    • @silviachamlee7425
      @silviachamlee7425 Місяць тому +1

      @@douglemay7989🤣😂🤣😂

    • @Memphis2010GFC
      @Memphis2010GFC Місяць тому

      @@douglemay7989 Oh Trump is not. Does he still think he beat Obama in the 2016 election and Niki Hailey was in charge of the Captial police on Jan 6th.

    • @meta4282
      @meta4282 Місяць тому +1

      ​@douglemay7989 yet he is still in office wandering around aimlessly in search of ice cream. PAUSE.

  • @fedbia2003
    @fedbia2003 22 дні тому

    You think our Founding Fathers would have given a FUCKING PASS to someone who wasn't caught IN OFFICE committing acts of treason, high crimes, or misdemeanors?!
    Look, anyone can think what they want about the lawsuits, impeachment hearings, etc. But to imply that this was intended in the framework of our society that split away from monarchies doing the same thing is absolutely ridiculous!

  • @finbarrmcgrath1686
    @finbarrmcgrath1686 Місяць тому

    When did immunity become a thing???

  • @keithgoodridge3856
    @keithgoodridge3856 Місяць тому +3

    You have to admire this lawyer for being able to navigate this verbal assault of obvious entrapment snx stonewalling of an interview

  • @user-ly9hm6lv2v
    @user-ly9hm6lv2v Місяць тому +18

    Except HUNTER,CLINTON'S, BIDEN, MYORKS, hmmm who els.

    • @hemihead001
      @hemihead001 Місяць тому +4

      Obama .

    • @user-nh3iv4oe9d
      @user-nh3iv4oe9d Місяць тому

      They have no bearing in Trump’s criminal behavior. Trump, Clinton, and Mayorkas we’re all impeached but not convicted. Biden was not impeached. Hunter Biden was not a government official, therefore cannot be impeached. What’s your point?

    • @markkozlowski3674
      @markkozlowski3674 Місяць тому

      Who is Myorks?

    • @westbygodvirginia555
      @westbygodvirginia555 Місяць тому

      And who is els? Wtf

  • @nakiawashington7520
    @nakiawashington7520 Місяць тому +2

    Immunity means exempt

  • @Sonyag1
    @Sonyag1 Місяць тому +1

    Otis Redding said it. And this court is doing it...."sitting....wasting time..."

  • @highwaycoffeemanguy9678
    @highwaycoffeemanguy9678 Місяць тому +50

    Trump 2024

    • @Lizabitch
      @Lizabitch Місяць тому +1

      Yeah for the next cast of Dancing With the Stars

    • @user-nh3iv4oe9d
      @user-nh3iv4oe9d Місяць тому

      WTF ? I thought comments were supposed to intelligently reference the arguments before the court? Not political idiotic howling.

    • @harrisonskelton6934
      @harrisonskelton6934 Місяць тому +6

      ​@@user-nh3iv4oe9dthis is UA-cam bud not a hearing😂. I can see why you voted for Biden 😂

  • @waynelucier1678
    @waynelucier1678 Місяць тому

    I didn't think Bosley was still around

  • @markjohnson4053
    @markjohnson4053 Місяць тому

    ACB is very intelligent and has an incredible memory.

  • @bjornjoseph
    @bjornjoseph 29 днів тому

    He reminds me of the guy from independence day
    David daaaavid why did I send my mutha away😂

  • @williampapadopoulos8145
    @williampapadopoulos8145 Місяць тому +1

    Sounds like Merrick Garland talking. I didn’t know he was Trump’s lawyer! What CLICKBAIT!

  • @pavernater
    @pavernater Місяць тому +5

    Awesome attorney, knows his shit

    • @BizznessBox
      @BizznessBox Місяць тому

      Would you favour Biden to be indicted for accepting bribes if evidence established that? Or should Biden as president be absolutely immune from prosecution? Lots of Maga people want Biden indicted thus undermining Trump's very own argument.

    • @pavernater
      @pavernater Місяць тому

      @@BizznessBox That's treason, perishable by death. It's not what Trumps arguing. Nice try.

    • @markp7262
      @markp7262 Місяць тому

      Yeah, he knows how to shovel it.

    • @pavernater
      @pavernater Місяць тому

      Well, if all they feed you is shit, best learn how to shovel it.

  • @williammiller7362
    @williammiller7362 Місяць тому +4

    It sounds like RFK jr. is Trump's lawyer.

  • @Kahless_the_Unforgettable
    @Kahless_the_Unforgettable Місяць тому

    High crimes and misdemeanors. Dur!

  • @scottread
    @scottread 29 днів тому

    I feel sorry for anyone who has to spend even a minute listening to Sauer's grating voice.

  • @jillhansinger4095
    @jillhansinger4095 Місяць тому +3

    Delay delay delay

  • @garyayres4404
    @garyayres4404 Місяць тому +8

    Trump for 2024 from the U.K.🇺🇸🇬🇧

  • @TM-xr4yv
    @TM-xr4yv Місяць тому +1

    HE WASNT EVEN FOUND GUILTY OF ANYTHING ... DUMIRATS ARE OUT OF CONTROL

  • @jsho12
    @jsho12 Місяць тому

    Nonsense arguments from Trump's attorneys. Just ridiculous.

  • @oliviacartwright3410
    @oliviacartwright3410 29 днів тому

    Trumps lawyer sounds like Bart Simpsons Aunt...Just sayin

  • @gregrupar135
    @gregrupar135 Місяць тому +12

    When he says peacefully protest. That’s the end of the argument. If he said storm the capital and over turn this election. That’s different.

    • @les0101s
      @les0101s Місяць тому +6

      He even tried to get Pence to overturn the election results.

    • @Lit-hf6gr
      @Lit-hf6gr Місяць тому

      ​@les0101s that's not true. He wanted pence to do what was in his power as the vp to send the votes back to the electorates. This was a soft coup and the Jan 6 bullshit was used to end the session. Illegitimate people run our government. That's why the country is going to shit. There now you're up to speed.

    • @user-qx2tk4sq9b
      @user-qx2tk4sq9b Місяць тому

      ​@@les0101spence was supposed to send the senators fraud issues back to the states. Obviously after the election the democrats first order of business was to change the rules. Now the vice president can not do anything. Witch will bite them in the ass come November when they try and claim fraud. To bad, oh so sad.

    • @lileos2837
      @lileos2837 Місяць тому +1

      That argument was made to discuss first amendment rights and presidential duties (eg, protesting instead of using presidential veo power was the hypothetical, which does not apply here, along with other official mechanisms to challenge election results that are part of his duties, which does apply)

    • @logangodofcandy
      @logangodofcandy Місяць тому

      The vice president counts the votes. He has legal authority to not do so.
      If nobody wins the presidential election, then the house speaker (Nancy pelosi at the time) is sworn in.
      Democrats only have stupid dishonest arguments.

  • @ZeroPoliticalCorrectnessLetsTa
    @ZeroPoliticalCorrectnessLetsTa Місяць тому +17

    Amy Coney is always in the middle or lefty. Trump made a big mistake having this woman on the bench. Should have nominated the Cuban one.

    • @carolynpeisert218
      @carolynpeisert218 Місяць тому +3

      Absolutely correct!!! So many on Supreme Court that should NOT BE!!! Totally unconstitutional!

    • @jimmieclark4638
      @jimmieclark4638 Місяць тому +3

      I am worried about this Jezebel

    • @judy.mckillip
      @judy.mckillip Місяць тому

      Remember keep your friends close and your enemy closer and never tell the enemy your plan.

    • @patrickczesak1559
      @patrickczesak1559 Місяць тому +6

      What difference does lefty or righty make? The only thing important is the Truth and the facts! Not lies, misinformation and any of the Supreme justices are supposed to be non- political! Not kiss assets!

    • @chipsterb4946
      @chipsterb4946 Місяць тому

      A Supreme Court Justice is not supposed to be right, left or middle. They are supposed to interpret laws in the context of the Constitution. Justice Barrett appears to be doing *exactly* that. She is intelligent and articulate. The Democrats politicized the Supreme Court - that’s how we got Rowe vs. Wade and so many other wretched decisions.

  • @silverbug2155
    @silverbug2155 Місяць тому

    These lawyers are whacked and traitors

  • @sandracloke6268
    @sandracloke6268 Місяць тому +1

    Sounds like Sauer is doing a lot of manipulating of this particular statute.