Audio | J. Krishnamurti & David Bohm - Gstaad 1975 - 7: If thought cannot achieve, why should it...

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 35

  • @wdwdHenry9022
    @wdwdHenry9022 2 роки тому +15

    These talks are a real treasure
    I have a sense that he is watching over us still
    Thank you K sir.
    🙏🏻

  • @rajagopalramani3719
    @rajagopalramani3719 2 роки тому +9

    Beautiful beautiful beautiful wonderful wonderful wonderful love you love you love you. Give everything in actuality let it flower. Thank you thank you thank you 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @papagabriola6494
    @papagabriola6494 Рік тому +3

    If any of us is not agnostic (assume the word is the thing here), then we are led by thought. Begin.

  • @johnchappell9232
    @johnchappell9232 2 роки тому +4

    Thought has a relationship to feeling as a particle has to a wave.
    It's possible to trace the immediate path of a thought, in its isolation, but feelings are more like a Web.The distribution of feeling is such that its impossible to tell its immediate situation.
    Thoughts seem to be a method of engagement with the Web of feeling, but then occasionally a thought will appear out of the Web also.
    For example when I feel love it is most relatable to the senses and perceptions inherent in the structure of bird life. So if I think of birds, how they behave to each other, their priorities etc, it gives me a framework on which to construct a thought. And to relay that to another.
    When relaying the entire feeling is impossible.
    Perhaps thought is a communication device and when communication is limited amongst individuals it becomes full of static.

  • @bharathbhushan916
    @bharathbhushan916 3 роки тому +16

    1:38:28 levitation

  • @nagarjunachoudary1757
    @nagarjunachoudary1757 2 роки тому +5

    1:33:53 When he talks about his experience in Bombay, the water turning sweet on the second round, is it the effect of sanyaasi or K

    • @tusharyechakar9138
      @tusharyechakar9138 2 роки тому +1

      I understand that it was due to old sannyasin but he himself was not aware of it.

    • @nagarjunachoudary1757
      @nagarjunachoudary1757 10 місяців тому

      You are correct, the sanyaasi was unaware, the point was the pointlessness of the strange or seemingly mysterious. Thanks.

  • @nickidaisydandelion4044
    @nickidaisydandelion4044 3 роки тому +5

    The mysterious is mysterious because we haven't explored into it scientifically Yet. Once we do it's no longer mysterious. But there will always be mysterious things happening out there because we will Never explore everything simply for the reason that things are infinite thus there will be infinitely many mysterious things happening. And it's all ok we don't need to explore and explain everything/endlessly.

    • @karanagrawal8499
      @karanagrawal8499 2 роки тому +2

      He is not talk of such mystery of which you are refering to. In his 6 talk percievieng without perciever

    • @zeynelblknc
      @zeynelblknc 10 місяців тому

      what you talk about is what they refer to as the reality which is created by thought, in reality, a lot of things which are unknown can be discovered, explained, and they say that since in modern age a lot of things are being explained, discovered, people started to lose the sense of mystery in general, but K says that there is an another mystery which is of a different order and cannot possibly be touched by thought ever, hence science cannot also.

  • @TheMonacarol
    @TheMonacarol Рік тому +1

    Amazing ❤

  • @gocorona4381
    @gocorona4381 4 роки тому +7

    Scary.....

  • @vamcKrishna97
    @vamcKrishna97 5 місяців тому

    28:30 unconsciousness
    What does it do

  • @sachindivakar632
    @sachindivakar632 5 років тому +1

    If someone don't have knowledge / understanding of what mystery it is how observer will be Mysterious ?

    • @billabongg973
      @billabongg973 3 роки тому +1

      There is no observer separate from the observed, thats the mystery.

  • @leilamobasserii
    @leilamobasserii 2 роки тому

    ❤️

  • @robertopuccianti8498
    @robertopuccianti8498 Рік тому

    🙏🧡🌻

  • @BEDLAMITE-5280ft.
    @BEDLAMITE-5280ft. Рік тому +2

    It’s penetrated through ritual magic. The theosophist highest mystery is the mystery of generation.

  • @img008
    @img008 3 роки тому +2

    35:00

  • @a_man_jaiswal
    @a_man_jaiswal 10 місяців тому

    47:24

  • @janrod3974
    @janrod3974 6 років тому +6

    Is there more to be told about the friendship between K and David Bohm? Somehow I am curious...

    • @KFoundation
      @KFoundation  6 років тому +19

      Thank you for your comment. There is indeed much to be told about K and Bohm's remarkable collaboration. A book on the topic came out recently, you can find it at this link: amzn.eu/dJ66Jic Also, stay tuned for more features on K and Bohm from the Foundations' side.

    • @senk2352
      @senk2352 6 років тому +6

      One of the most illuminating conversations between K and DB.
      Like The Ending of Time, the book "The Limits of Thought" contains revealing conversations.

    • @henrylopez945
      @henrylopez945 6 років тому +8

      Sorry my friend, but love, friendship has no bias, no opinion, no view on the harmonious communication , that's what love is and, fortunately for both these gentlemen that they found each other, makes my understanding a bit clearer by understanding how together they have explained clarity each with their own language.
      I'm happy, aren't you my friend, happy!

    • @richardcrocker8048
      @richardcrocker8048 4 роки тому +2

      Down the rabbit hole we go ....

    • @sylviagung1007
      @sylviagung1007 3 роки тому +1

      One way relationship. Find out for yourself. Don't trust anyone or any authority!

  • @alexfifi9734
    @alexfifi9734 3 роки тому

    Please