Making paper craft flying plane model Using the LONGER Laser B1 20W: Why Laser Beats Vinyl Cutters

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 лип 2023
  • Longer Laser B1 20W:
    www.gearberry.com/products/lo...
    In this video, we're taking a dive into the world of paper crafts and DIY projects. We're crafting an amazing Cardstock Glider, and showing you how it's done using both traditional hand-cutting techniques and the advanced Laser B1 20W.
    The Laser B1 20W is a powerful laser engraver that adds speed, precision, and efficiency to your DIY projects. While hand-cutting has its place, watch how the Laser B1 20W takes the crafting experience to another level. Compare this with what you'd get from a Cricut or Vinyl Cutter, and you'll see why the Laser B1 20W is an excellent investment for craft enthusiasts.
    In this video, you'll learn:
    How to craft a Cardstock Glider from scratch.
    The benefits of using a Laser B1 20W for your DIY projects.
    A comparison of hand-cutting vs. laser-cutting techniques.
    So, whether you're a DIY hobbyist, a crafting enthusiast, or someone who enjoys the beauty of flight, this video is for you.
    Feel free to download the template for this project from the link below and follow along. Happy Crafting!
    PDF Files:
    www.printables.com/model/520887/
    Onshape file:
    cad.onshape.com/publications/...
    Cannon Printer aircraft files:
    creativepark.canon/en/search/...
    Don't forget to like, share, and subscribe to our channel for more exciting DIY projects and product reviews. Leave a comment below to let us know how your Cardstock Glider turned out, or if you have any questions or suggestions for our next video.
    Thanks for watching!
  • Навчання та стиль

КОМЕНТАРІ • 18

  • @jeremypalmer5695
    @jeremypalmer5695 Рік тому

    Such a cool project, so glad I met you at Calgary Maker Faire.

  • @kevintofttoft
    @kevintofttoft Рік тому +1

    OH MAN!.... those are awesome!

  • @nigemilham8637
    @nigemilham8637 Рік тому +2

    Great plans and always going to be watching for the next Dr Evil reference. Ben's on 'Fire!' :o)

    • @DreadMakerRoberts
      @DreadMakerRoberts  Рік тому +1

      Next up, ill tempered sea bass. Or I can move on to another Mike Myers show the Pentaverate :)

  • @peterfelecan3639
    @peterfelecan3639 11 місяців тому +1

    A trove of ressources for building paper airplanes ! Thank you Ben.
    Please note that the link toward the printables site doesn't work as of today.

  • @Brownstone31
    @Brownstone31 Рік тому +2

    Nice. I may have to try those. FYI the sound is single channel only on the lightburn voiceover.

    • @DreadMakerRoberts
      @DreadMakerRoberts  Рік тому +1

      Yes, my bad. Not going to re-render and re-upload cause I’m lazy and also because I’m a few thousand miles from the computer with the files :)

  • @ravenspropshop
    @ravenspropshop Рік тому +2

    Hey Ben! Loved the video! Will you be attending Opensauce live at all?

    • @DreadMakerRoberts
      @DreadMakerRoberts  Рік тому

      No unfortunately. Wanted to but it just not in the cards for me this year.

  • @kevintofttoft
    @kevintofttoft Рік тому +1

    Will this work made out of Evergreen Polystyrene?

    • @DreadMakerRoberts
      @DreadMakerRoberts  11 місяців тому +1

      Yes but you would need to weight the nose and reinforce the fuselage along it’s length with something like a bamboo skewer

  • @daviddavids2884
    @daviddavids2884 Рік тому +1

    noice info - 6:35, 7:39 it is unclear whether the available information includes the following.
    it is Necessary that a model have a correctly/optimally located cg, Before trimming the elevator/stab for level flight. the optimal location of cg is ALWAYS significantly Determined by the geometry of the main Wing. that being,
    at Thirty percent of chord/mac.
    knowing this makes it easy to calculate and find a good cg location, for any model. where a model does not have a highly swept main wing, thirty percent of root chord is semi-accurate.
    :26 too much force at launch. flight surfaces are deforming. 5:54 span of the horiz-stab should be equal to thirty percent of the wing span; there is excess mass in the stab. d

    • @DreadMakerRoberts
      @DreadMakerRoberts  Рік тому

      It is inherently stable. It has a very wide window for CofG. Chord, the mass and areas are calculated already. It flys quite nice no matter how good or bad it is built. This is meant to give a good easy win on the first try. I am not going down the rabbit hole of the math and such I use. FYI I am a aeronautical engineer with expertise in low speed compressible flow flight dynamics and hold a few world records. All of what you say is valid but at this scale and Reynolds’s numbers things are not as cut and dry as you mention here. Yes the wings bend as it was launched too hard but you will find once trimmed it allows it to be shot quite high and as the g-forces release at apogee the aircraft snaps back into its trimmed position and glides

    • @DreadMakerRoberts
      @DreadMakerRoberts  Рік тому

      As it is the CofG is actually at 75% chord, the angle of attack is 1.5-2 degrees WRT the tail surface. It is also quite low along the fuselage giving more stability. The tail surface is quite large. In this configuration as a small model it floats more and is more stable with a shorter fuselage. And the CofG can vary within 20% -80% chord and still fly stable. This is a property that the huge horizontal stabilizer brings in with this design. The sweep you will notice is only at the back of the main wing. This also is a contributor to allowing such a huge CofG shift yet fly stable

  • @malcolmgraves3574
    @malcolmgraves3574 11 місяців тому

    *Promo sm* 😭