I'm 78, a graduate of Wapner Law School. I had no idea how much I was interested in the law until I started watching that show. It always surprised me that he could "take a brief recess and come back with my decision" on issues that would seem impossible to decide. What I didn't realize was that the law, if properly interpreted, decides who prevails. The show would have meant nothing to me if he didn't explain the "how" of his decisions. I never knew before then that a meeting-of-the minds, for example, can make or break a case. This comment is already too long for UA-cam. But in another of your videos I'm going to suggest a movie that I think would make for a great discussion for one of your episodes. Oh what the hell. The movie, Fracture (2007) depicts a work-around for double jeopardy. The question for you is: Would this work in the real world? The movie: ua-cam.com/video/u6bKxsZAPhE/v-deo.html
I had such a fun time being a special guest moderator on the Layman’s Law School! Thanks for having me guys!
I'm 78, a graduate of Wapner Law School. I had no idea how much I was interested in the law until I started watching that show. It always surprised me that he could "take a brief recess and come back with my decision" on issues that would seem impossible to decide. What I didn't realize was that the law, if properly interpreted, decides who prevails. The show would have meant nothing to me if he didn't explain the "how" of his decisions. I never knew before then that a meeting-of-the minds, for example, can make or break a case. This comment is already too long for UA-cam. But in another of your videos I'm going to suggest a movie that I think would make for a great discussion for one of your episodes.
Oh what the hell. The movie, Fracture (2007) depicts a work-around for double jeopardy. The question for you is: Would this work in the real world? The movie: ua-cam.com/video/u6bKxsZAPhE/v-deo.html
Thanks for watching! We may need a refresher on watching the movie to get all the facts first!