Naval Group Unveils Large UUV
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 жов 2021
- During the fifth edition of the Naval Innovation Days, Naval Group unveiled for the first time to the public its Large Unmanned Underwater Vehicle (UUV) demonstrator.
=====================
The underwater threat is becoming a major issue for the navies in the near future. The Oceanic Underwater Drone Demonstrator is a project that federates technological developments. One of the main challenges is controlled decision-making autonomy, which will be at the heart of the drone capabilities. This demonstrator will enable the design, qualification and validation of technological building blocks. This workshop presented at the Naval innovation days highlights the opportunities for agile development, together with the French authorities and our partners, to provide advanced systems dedicated to tomorrow’s underwater warfare.
=====================
For new videos every week, subscribe here! ua-cam.com/users/NavalNews?su...
Follow us on Twitter: / navalnewscom
Follow us on LinkedIn: / navalnews
Like us on Facebook: navalnewscom
Check out our daily naval defense news coverage at: www.navalnews.com/
NAVAL NEWS is fully focused on naval topics. We cover the latest naval defense shows & events. We also report on naval technology from all over the world. Navalnews.com is updated daily with in-depth features, industry, and naval forces news round-ups, event coverage, video reports and more. Our top of the line site is responsive across all mobile and desktop devices.
Great Moove Naval Group 🇫🇷
gorgeous
Really cool.
It will never happen anyway, we don't work with unreliable and traitorous countries
Very interesting development! Hopefully such drone subs can be built faster, delivered on schedule and within budget. Things that seem impossible with normal conventional or nuclear subs.
For that to happen, you need to force capability caps and avoid mission/capability creep. Such caps are hard as, 1) this is an evolving technology and capping capabilities can quickly result in mediocre and uncompetitive boats that quickly get obsolete, and 2) except for truly expendable units, there is a tendency to want to maximize capability where possible.
Will the new French subs have a well dock to embark these UUVs ?
They have a dock indeed, I don’t know if it will be able to hold this machine.
@@jetaddicted for the Suffren class yes
Breaking news: Australia orders 50 units of these to replace their nuclear subs from USA
😂
La France n'a pas dit son dernier mot.
Méfiez vous de Zemmour il est pro Européen et anti social
@@ey6713 A un moment il faut choisir ses priorités '
RTG onboard?
Canadas submarine replacement program.
Wifi? I want a router with that kind of range please.
Interesting if they can use that to connect to vessels to snoop/hack if they are broadcasting such a network at sea.
Looks nice. Maybe Australia will be interested in this to pair with their Unmanned Wingman.
It would be good,but will Naval Group pick up the phone ?.
@@johnkrivokapic7527 as long Naval Group won't jack up the price, Australia might be interested. 😉
@@paulsteaven jack up the price?
Of that €34billion contract, Naval Group was only charging €8billion.
The bulk of the cost was for US weapons systems and Australia to build a local infrastructure and supply chain with local suppliers.
Maybe you should inform yourself and stop parroting nonesense from Murdoch media 😛
@@lordtemplar9274 your wrong and maybe you should stop parroting your French or European propaganda we had paid $5bil for the design phase and they didn't do that on time and was 2yrs already behind and no sign of it concluding anytime soon as soon as Australia said they were the prime and only contractor the French took full advantage and were bleeding us dry and giving nothing back in return!!
@@montys420- when the client want to change everything to integrate US weaponry and an electric-diesel motor on a submarine initially developed with a nuclar reactor, it takes more time and money.
Stop finding bad excuses for having stabbed France in the back with the secret deal Aukus.
And be happy : now your country is a proxy puppet for the US in their war against China, lucky you, aussie will pay 150 B$ for their submarines to be delivered in 2040 :DDDD
toujours pas en français
10 tonnes c'est beaucoup non ?
Non un sous marin c'est 2000 tonne minmum donc 10tonnes avec une bonne autonomie cets incroyable
c'est dans l'eau hein
@@alexandrepezzotti9344 vous n'avez pas considéré la puissance de RTG. un radar puissant nécessite beaucoup d'énergie électrique
Who sabotaged the NORD STREAM pipe line ?
Australia here, we'll take 12!
Yeah nah...
Φυλάξτε μας 3+1
Lol x)
1
Uuv
Many types of ai. Lmao
Looks dumb, looks too futuristic, looks impossible to actually be built or used.
next clip: *Prototype being tested*
Me: ah, This is good! This is genius solution! 😂
Faut travailler un peu plus l'anglais, même si en ce moment ont en a pas trop envie.
Mission speed of 6 knots, against a current that will be even less, no ability to net the sensor product in underwater as no RF as alluded to. Tough to see the mission set this services.
@@mygarart2764 no ones XLUUVs really go much faster. Limit is in the energy storage onboard. Batteries and fuel cells only go so far. The Russians claim to have a sealed small reactor package for theirs - so that system has until the first reactor breaks, or the first time a terrorist captures one and gets a reactor to play with, to be in service. No way round it or the radio comms problem yet for any of these type vehicles.
so you had time to develop a UUV but couldn't find the time to design Australia's 12 $70B subs?
Wtf ?
Raging Australian US pet dog. France will laugh soon when US will show to Australia the Total Bill 250 $billions for only 8 subs 😂 😂
@@charlesmartel2167 like most french products it'll barely last a week before bresking down... Australia had dodged a bullet
@@Kvasiir lol France is 3rd exporter for decades .. all over the world , not like crappy overated stuff from US or UK . France already received its First Nuclear Barracuda class and next year 2nd unit is planned. Right now Australia has nothing and probably will have to rent old technology from us or uk. The shame.
We are preparing popcorn 🍿 to watch next AUKUS disaster in Indo Pacific.
Hold my cognac 🥃.
@@charlesmartel2167 yeahh . Like for their 1 $trillion Flying Penguin (Fail35) 😂
When you're an R&D Project Manager ... you try to speak English ... Quand on est R&D Project Manager ... On essaie de savoir parler anglais ...
Il parle Anglais, avec lenteur et un fort accent mais au niveau vocab, grammaire etc, il ne s’en sort pas trop mal.
J’avoue: la marge de progression est conséquente au niveau accent et fluidité.
vla le casse couille de base
avec ses points de suspension ... manque plus que le ... à méditer ... et on est bon ...
?Large?!!!! ..... you could pick it up with one hand
that is the scale model🤣
Reminds me the zoolander scene with the mockup. 🤣
And if it's anything like the failed Attack class submarine for aust it will be 2Billion over budget, 2 years behind schedule and have doubled in price before any steel has been cut. Not to mention the Tiger and MH90 helicopters that still don't work as advertised after 15 years and billions spent on them. 🇦🇺☹
You learned the BS excuses made by the Australian prime Sinister very well. He "forgot" to mention all the changes AUS wanted in the subs, making the overtime and costs explode.
And about the helicopters, France have the same in operation in Sahel and they work very well in the harsh conditions of Sahara desert. It is just the Aussie who don't know how to maintain the helicopters. Buying other choppers will not change the lack of maintenance and the lack of investment in spare parts.
And it is also another excuse to buy choppers to Uncle Sam. Good boi Australia, you follow the tracks of your former boss
@@remistiegler5302 True. All but one of the countries that buys french (and european) equipments have problems with it, when the others praise their reliability, performance, ease of mainteance . But right, the problem is France. How come it is the 3rd exporter of arms in the world ? Are those country masochist ? The answer is, Australia asked for 8 disel submarines, then, wanted them to have the possibility to be refited with nuclear at a later stage (which need more studies, cost more than before) , asked for 70% of the construction to be made in Australia, a country with zero know how in this domain (time to form the employees, to build infrastructures), then went for 12 subs instead of 8 (+ 50%). Also the Aus dollar lost 15% of its value. And when faced with overcost, they accuse France. When Naval Group would have gain way less than Locked Martin in the contract, and most value would have been made in Australia, not in France. The contract, is under the pressure of foreign powers, murdock press, and a bias towaard everything french, but is still going. Australia, in the back of France, decides secretely to go nuclear, with the influence of US ans UK. When France could have provided it in the first place, instead of converting nucleat in to diesel. The three forms an alliance, excluding France which is yet a pacific power for whatever reasons. Anglo club is suppose. Everyone learns it on tv, even the Australian employee of Naval Group that had moved in France. Learns from Biden not even "that guy" which is revaling. The same morning, Fr authorities received a latter saying Australian were sattisifed whith the programm, and that it could go to the next level. France is understandably pissed of, and that spineless Morrison goes Pikachu face.
@Narnigo o: not only can NAVAL group build nuclear subs: with a price of 1BnUS$, it will do so at a fraction of the price offered by the competitors, be them British (2BnUS$), or American (3BnUS$).
The Aussies got shafted and they’re happily repeating the lies they’ve been told by their Murdoch owned press in order to justify it.
Fact is that only 8Bn US$ of the contract was to go to France, and that the extra costs have had a huge lot to do with Canberra’s whacky demands and change of plans, alongside a 16% devaluation of the Au$ against the € since the deal was struck.
Now Oz is to get a reduced sub fleet (8 instead of 12), at a much later date, provided they get to manage the nuke tech, which is not necessarily a given.
Not to mention that their action enables countries to now sell nuclear powered subs at will (say hello to China and Russia, and who knows, soon enough North Korea or Iran?), not to mention souring relations with what remains one of Australia’s Closest geographical neighbors, France.
The country that is weeks away from taking presidency of the EU, this at a time when Canberra is trying to strike a trade deal with Brussels.
Well done indeed.
@@jetaddicted you forget one of the main reasons we are not buying French Nuclear subs (And probably the real reason your group and President have lost their collective Galic Cool) is that French Nucs have to refuel every 15 years where as the British and American ones have do not in their lifetime 😁🇦🇺
@@mylesdobinson1534 LOL nice try but you're wiiiiiide of the mark. First of all, France never sold nuclear-powered subs, they even never had the chance to do so, as Australia made a secret deal with its former boss and its new boss in the back of France.
France with Naval Group won and signed a contract with Canberra for 12 diesel-electric subs, at a time Australia respected the non-nuclear proliferation agreement (another one that your gov broke 🙈🙉🙊).
And about the 15 years nuclear fuel reload, it is made during the midlife refit so it's doesn't change that much.
Do you believe the US or UK subs navigate 30 years without heavy repair and refit ? 😂😂😂 how cute