There are definitely some advantages to having unmanned submarines: no need for berthing or quarters - in general, no need for sanitation plumbing, galley, food storage, crew's air storage, treatment, filters, or conditioning/cooling/heating or movement (fans). This would certainly make more room for weapons, sensors, and payload. As an ex bubblehead, I'm beginning to feel unneeded.
First they armed the robots. Then they gave them AI so they could think. Then one day the lights went out and that was the end of life as we knew it in the before times. Nobody knows exactly what happened but there are stories of entire cities being wiped off the map the ashen ruins of which look like some sort of post apocalyptic scene from a movie or video game. We know it was men who darkened the sky to deny power to the creature that hunted them without need for rest or mercy. But what happened next none of us could ever have anticipated.
Most of our fictional works are written by people who understand almost nothing about programming, and even the tiny fraction that do often made conceits for entertainment.
In military technology it is always important to consider not just what a weapon is designed for but what it is also capable of. We may claim the Orca was designed for 'laying mines' but our adversaries will immediately see this as a nuclear weapon delivery system. Heck if those adversaries had this technology we would be scared of them using it for that purpose.
@@mikebikekite1 supposedly it is both nuclear powered and carries a nuclear warhead meaning its range is really unlimited or measured in years..if the weapon truly exists..it seems to at least have been developed and some submarines totally redesigned to carry and fire it, so it possibly is a real weapon.
Because nothing brightens the morning, like Chineese or Russian nuclear warhead exploding above your city. But dont worry, america will not participate neither in Ukraine, nor in Thaiwan area. Biden crime familly is payd by Ukraine, therefore it is more likely they will GIVE to Ukraine the technology to make their own drones. China payd them too, therefore when China starts to make its move, US will loose some 2.nd and 3rd line light warships, for the honour of the flag, but the fleet core and most expansive technologies will be "on training mission" somewhere else, probably out of reach even. You know, when your supreme leader kinda wants the other side to win, it is hard to follow orders...
O really,,,,,,,,You do know that this sub is only in prototype form,,,,,,,,Let me tell you about a real leviathan that's roaming the oceans right now,,,,The Russian navy has a nuclear powered nuclear torpedo,,Its about 60 feet long,,And is carried inside Russia's latest generation sub,,,When launched this compleatly autonomus torpedo can roam the oceans for years without refuelling ,,It sits on the bottom of the sea floor and deactivates itself,,When it needs to it activates and travels at extream death to its destination,,At its destination it detonates its 100 megaton warhead causing an underwater earthquake ,,In turn causing a 300 foot high tsunami traveling at hundreds of MPH ,,100 miles inland obliterating everything ,,,
If memory serves the Ohio class SSBN was originally designed to sit on the seafloor. Ivan didn’t like it so there is a treaty that stipulates a boomer cannot sit on the seafloor. I don’t know if that treaty is still in effect.
Besides warfare this vessel should be used to map out the deepest parts of the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. I’m sure cameras could be adapted to work on the along with lighting to help see what hasn’t been seen.
Unfortunately, it's not really going all that deep. Assuming an operational depth of 1000 feet, it would still be over 35,000 feet from the bottom of the deepest part of the ocean.
@@supergeek1418it could easily be made to reach these depths , and further mankind’s knowledge of the dark depths, but this machine is meant for mangling people not furthering their knowledge 😂😂
@@royharkins7066 Not "easily". Deep submersion research vessels are *MUCH* more difficult and expensive to build --- not to mention *MUCH* smaller.. And as to "mangling"? Unfortunately, there are some actual evil bad actors out there, who only understand force. *TRUTH*
All of the oceans have been mapped, quite extensively. We have depth sensing sonars that can reach the bottom of the ocean, wherever we care to go. No need to physically go there, if our sensors can detect it.
Gosh let's push another unproven conspiracy theory. Isn't it strange how they always seem to be a western government but never say Chinese or Russian? Even though all these conspiracy theories seem to originate in China or Russian websites.
Imagine the research benefits something like this would provide! All of the legends of sea monsters would be put to rest or proven to be true. It’s high time that we explored the oceans,we know so little about them.
You do realize that all these "benefits" mean nothing under millions of pounds of pressures/sq inch? you can look up loads of military documents and engineering documents+ videos to find out why we haven't gone extreme deep with really big subs.
Well..... There's the "Freedom of Information Act". Then there's the Government's ability to masterfully use Misinformation/ Disinformation... Lie or let U believe any Lie U can concoct.
@@craigkdillon @ryandouglas6247 We Americans do our best to not share 'how' we do it. Our luck that others catch up so slowly. It's just how war drives technology as it always has.
I find fascinating the fact we know near to nothing about the Status 6, except what it might be used for (even the yeld of it's warhead is all over the place), but instead the US navy is so kind to share so much of it's "secret" weapon (from these videos we know what materials it's made of, more or less where components are placed etc)...
YOU know near nothing about it which just means the important secrets are being kept. Besides, they mentioned its payload. What do you know of the Clandestine Delivered Mine? Besides, Russia leaked info on the status 6 intentionally as a threat, for all we know it's just a design. This is a more clear threat and nations like China have now taken note.
one thing a weapon like this could do is cut undersea cables that carry internet/data etc..as well as cutting or laying mines and blowing up undersea pipelines that carry oil..both are/would be devastating. Obviously we could do this previously, but this makes it easier and you can do it unmanned and possibly at much greater depths.
A submarine is limited by the amount of food it can carry. This UUV was inevitable. It can be parked in one place for months surveying the movement of everyone else. A mobile SOSUS with attack capabilities.
The hull is flat-sided, which means it cannot go very deep (e.g., designed exclusively for a littoral mission set) or, because it had no need to protect fragile human crews, it can go very, very deep by equalizing internal and external hydrostatic pressure. If it is acoustically invisible, it may have the ability to re-echo the ambient natural acoustical signature. (Noise-Cancelling + Anti-noised cancelling.) BTW, on the scale of US defensive expenditures, $242M is by no means whopping. Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, or George Soros could fund a fleet with what they spend on yachts.
@@CRAZYCR1T1C Agree that must be the case if it can go very deep. But, how do they pull that off from an engineering standpoint? The interior must be filled with an incompressible liquid that can still allow all the tech to function. (My best guess.)
Who maintains the mechanicals? Are there AI snipes onboard? I have a hard time believing that nothing will go wrong with the unit for months at a time.
@@duanepigden1337 And WW2, but WW1 didn't have much in the way of bombers, and in WW2 only the U. S. had any nukes - and then just barely. Today's weaponry (on all sides) is much faster, and much more lethal --- our largest conventional bombs (MOAB, etc.) are more powerful than our smaller nukes. No. Today's weaponry is orders of magnitude more dangerous than in wars past. If a war was to take off today, the carnage would be incalculable.
You talked about the razorback drones, and posted a picture of the Guppy class submarine USS Razorback that the US sold to Turkey in 1970. How does one confuse the two?
Pretty easy to build a monopoly when there is only 3 defensive contractors competing with each other. They warned about the military industrial complex becoming too powerful. But yet nothing has happened to stop it or slow it down
The start of "WaterNet" to work with "SkyNet" for a safer tomorrow :( With if being harder and harder to meet enlistment quotas for all the military branches, this is the future. Combine all these drones with AI and then arm them with the latest weapons .....what harm could ever come from that James Cameron ?
I wonder how it handles drag nets. A quick net search pulls an eBay listing for a _Commercial Fishing Net 6 inch 180 mesh 1260 ft mono dark green / Premium Net_ for _$1,450.00._ At that price, if one gets snagged on the ocean floor, an unscrupulous captain might just cut it loose and string a replacement. Given that the ocean is constantly in motion, the snagged net could become unsnagged. The ebb & flow could allow the net to cut through whatever was holding it. Modern technology vs. Mesolithic technology. I hope it's been addressed, because this drone is an amazing piece of work.
"If this, than that, right?" The answer is yes, you're a dead man walking no matter what takes you. Sub, no sub, age, drugs, random act of God.... dead all the same.
Has anyone heard/seen/read of this new Torpedo Russia has that to me is terrifying because it's use is made more probable due lack of bomb damage. They've had for years developed a Rocket powered Torpedo that somehow blows a bubble of gas around it as it travels through the water at approx. 400 mph, it's Warhead is the Czar Bomba, a 50 to 100 megaton thermo-nuclear bomb, made to explode off the coast of a Major city drowning it in a massive tsunami
Humans would totaly annihilate an Orca or even an entire pod of them. Seaworld mat not have had the means to make them slaves, but the military definently has. An Orca is pretty agile, and cunning, but they stans no chance against charges detonated at depth sending the shock-wave through the near-incompressible water towards the pod from all angles at once. In the worst case scenario their habitat could be turned into glass one bit at a time, forcing the Orcas to surrender or face total annihilation.
@@karlostj4683 Sorry, I put the phone down forgetting what I had been watching and lost the context of what you wrote. But I still believe that a mordern military could win over an Orca pod. Explosions are way more effective in water, so they would not stand much of a chance. It's an interesting conversation to be had non the less.
@@oonmm Did you not watch the actual video? It's about underwater robots, not actual whales. The robot is named "Orca" which is why I wrote "hearing how Orca does" as opposed to "hearing how a pod of orcas do". Given the whaling industry's near annihilation of certain types of whales back in the 1800s, I have little doubt that a modern military could fully annihilate a particular subgrouping of whales.
@@karlostj4683 Agree, any race of whale would have to surrender immeadietly in a conflict with our mordern military forces. I bet some races could put up a fight against a single frigate or two, but as soon as the destroyers join in they will drop the depth charges - and by then it's game over if they didn't already surrender. The superior speed of destroyers and their underwater bombs would make quick work of any marine animal. If whales organized small attacks and set up a perimeter blocking oilers and other transport then maybe they could interrupt our operations, given that they retreat as soon as the quick war vessels catch up. There are indeed a variety of terrorist acts that the Orcas could carry out before declaring war, crippling our capabilities before the full on conflict.
impressive we need a Navy/Cost Guard missile based strategic plan bring all our assets to a 500 mile radius of our coast lines but a few of these could be a real deterrent
Are they showing the actual propeller blades, or is this a mock-up, to be replaced in the operational model? Because they never show the public the propeller blades on submarines in service. Only on old, obsolete and retired museum pieces - and not always, even then. Apparently, if you know the shape of the propeller blades, you can calculate the noise they make in the water and then use that to detect the subs. Or so I'm told. Another interesting point is that for decades the US Navy resisted not only acquiring and deploying Diesel-electric submarines, but also manufacturing such subs for foreign clients anywhere in the US, less the fact the US already builds such subs would be leveraged to put pressure on the navy to buy some instead of its way more costly nuclear subs. And now they are making 5 new Diesel-electric subs for the first time in like 60 years and counting.
This sort of drone could be particularly useful for Taiwan's defense needs.
Excellent point! 👍😀
The Straits of Formosa are very shallow and a bad environment for full sized submarine operations.
Yes I think every bullied nation could use this technology. A good bridge buster if you know what I mean!🤣
I am sure Taiwan an the US have discussed this an many other things we the public are not aware of 🇺🇸 🇹🇼👍
And destroying Chinese fishing fleets
Absolutely but I’m pretty sure the us got one floating around there
There are definitely some advantages to having unmanned submarines: no need for berthing or quarters - in general, no need for sanitation plumbing, galley, food storage, crew's air storage, treatment, filters, or conditioning/cooling/heating or movement (fans).
This would certainly make more room for weapons, sensors, and payload.
As an ex bubblehead, I'm beginning to feel unneeded.
This ex boomer sailor agrees
@@NopiusMaximus
What boat were you on?
I was 610 Blue.
Either of you seasoned enough to have been to the Horse and Cow in Point Loma circa late 90's?
@@jonnie106
I was in New London, 69 - 72, so no. Fiddlers 3, though, a time or 2. 😉😆
Until it's hacked
First they armed the robots. Then they gave them AI so they could think. Then one day the lights went out and that was the end of life as we knew it in the before times. Nobody knows exactly what happened but there are stories of entire cities being wiped off the map the ashen ruins of which look like some sort of post apocalyptic scene from a movie or video game. We know it was men who darkened the sky to deny power to the creature that hunted them without need for rest or mercy. But what happened next none of us could ever have anticipated.
lets hope so
the russians,china can jam these easily
There’s about three movies in there, but it’s still good.
Most of our fictional works are written by people who understand almost nothing about programming, and even the tiny fraction that do often made conceits for entertainment.
Always keep in mind that actual military technology is usually a decade or two ahead of what they are willing to disclose to the public...
Yep
I never gave it any thought till now
The newest challenge for The Lock Picking Lawyer!
“Hey, there was nobody on board. I was just going to salvage it!”
In military technology it is always important to consider not just what a weapon is designed for but what it is also capable of.
We may claim the Orca was designed for 'laying mines' but our adversaries will immediately see this as a nuclear weapon delivery system.
Heck if those adversaries had this technology we would be scared of them using it for that purpose.
Russia supposedly already has the Poseidon autonomous torpedo, equipped with a nuclear bomb and with a range of 10,000 km.
@@mikebikekite1They will think TWICE about using theirs now. 🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸🦅
@@mikebikekite1 supposedly it is both nuclear powered and carries a nuclear warhead meaning its range is really unlimited or measured in years..if the weapon truly exists..it seems to at least have been developed and some submarines totally redesigned to carry and fire it, so it possibly is a real weapon.
You’re absolutely right,adversaries they don’t possess the same technology will always see the worst.
If only there were a place in Europe to test it out right now....
It will take time
They already did on Nordic pipeline
Taiwan is the place to test it, IMO.
Because nothing brightens the morning, like Chineese or Russian nuclear warhead exploding above your city. But dont worry, america will not participate neither in Ukraine, nor in Thaiwan area. Biden crime familly is payd by Ukraine, therefore it is more likely they will GIVE to Ukraine the technology to make their own drones. China payd them too, therefore when China starts to make its move, US will loose some 2.nd and 3rd line light warships, for the honour of the flag, but the fleet core and most expansive technologies will be "on training mission" somewhere else, probably out of reach even. You know, when your supreme leader kinda wants the other side to win, it is hard to follow orders...
😂
All the homeless in the US will be so happy to hear about this.
Great video, very informative, these things are going to take over the seas
"Going to"? Hell..... this is old news, and old technology.
No other navy has anything like this hundred percent game changer👍👏
O really,,,,,,,,You do know that this sub is only in prototype form,,,,,,,,Let me tell you about a real leviathan that's roaming the oceans right now,,,,The Russian navy has a nuclear powered nuclear torpedo,,Its about 60 feet long,,And is carried inside Russia's latest generation sub,,,When launched this compleatly autonomus torpedo can roam the oceans for years without refuelling ,,It sits on the bottom of the sea floor and deactivates itself,,When it needs to it activates and travels at extream death to its destination,,At its destination it detonates its 100 megaton warhead causing an underwater earthquake ,,In turn causing a 300 foot high tsunami traveling at hundreds of MPH ,,100 miles inland obliterating everything ,,,
neat love hearing about naval drones
Can it cut the Nordic gas pipelines? ⛽️💥
i also wanna know about it 😂😎
DID it cut the Nord Stream?
The pipeline was blown from the INSIDE on the Russian side, which meant they didn't have to pay the fines for stopping the gas...
ORCA......to a man with a hammer....
Easy
Autonomously deployed underwater based missile launch systems. Sit for months/years just waiting for launch command.
If memory serves the Ohio class SSBN was originally designed to sit on the seafloor. Ivan didn’t like it so there is a treaty that stipulates a boomer cannot sit on the seafloor. I don’t know if that treaty is still in effect.
Besides warfare this vessel should be used to map out the deepest parts of the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. I’m sure cameras could be adapted to work on the along with lighting to help see what hasn’t been seen.
Unfortunately, it's not really going all that deep.
Assuming an operational depth of 1000 feet, it would still be over 35,000 feet from the bottom of the deepest part of the ocean.
@@supergeek1418it could easily be made to reach these depths , and further mankind’s knowledge of the dark depths, but this machine is meant for mangling people not furthering their knowledge 😂😂
@@royharkins7066
Not "easily".
Deep submersion research vessels are *MUCH* more difficult and expensive to build --- not to mention *MUCH* smaller..
And as to "mangling"? Unfortunately, there are some actual evil bad actors out there, who only understand force.
*TRUTH*
All of the oceans have been mapped, quite extensively. We have depth sensing sonars that can reach the bottom of the ocean, wherever we care to go.
No need to physically go there, if our sensors can detect it.
Wonder if it could say take out a undersea pipeline ?
My thoughts as well
What a total and unheard of coincidence.😮
Gosh let's push another unproven conspiracy theory. Isn't it strange how they always seem to be a western government but never say Chinese or Russian? Even though all these conspiracy theories seem to originate in China or Russian websites.
Wasn't pipeline too low?
Russian and Chinese bots sure are funny.
the tech we process is unimaginable to the masses
Aw, man. Seeing that 91X sticker on a hard hat takes me back. I went to sonar tech A school in San Diego mid 80s. Great rundown on this new gadget.
San Diego sure was nice back then. Especially north county.
Imagine the research benefits something like this would provide!
All of the legends of sea monsters would be put to rest or proven to be true.
It’s high time that we explored the oceans,we know so little about them.
You do realize that all these "benefits" mean nothing under millions of pounds of pressures/sq inch? you can look up loads of military documents and engineering documents+ videos to find out why we haven't gone extreme deep with really big subs.
@@mindsoulbody I’m not talking about manned vehicles though I recall that one traveled to the bottom of the Marianas Trench.
I love how America literally tells the the world about everything we do.
if tha government tells u sum (in any capacity) it’s prolly been a thing or concept for years
The more enemies know what we can do - the less likely we will actually have to use the stuff.
Well.....
There's the "Freedom of Information Act". Then there's the Government's ability to masterfully use Misinformation/ Disinformation... Lie or let U believe any Lie U can concoct.
@@craigkdillon @ryandouglas6247 We Americans do our best to not share 'how' we do it. Our luck that others catch up so slowly. It's just how war drives technology as it always has.
I think they only publicize what is already knowable to anyone interested enough to look. More interesting is what they don't publicize.
I find fascinating the fact we know near to nothing about the Status 6, except what it might be used for (even the yeld of it's warhead is all over the place), but instead the US navy is so kind to share so much of it's "secret" weapon (from these videos we know what materials it's made of, more or less where components are placed etc)...
YOU know near nothing about it which just means the important secrets are being kept. Besides, they mentioned its payload. What do you know of the Clandestine Delivered Mine? Besides, Russia leaked info on the status 6 intentionally as a threat, for all we know it's just a design. This is a more clear threat and nations like China have now taken note.
Nothing wrong with knowledge.. not all is revealed
@@jim0311 I'm sure the Chinese navy agrees with you 😉
@@alexanderbonardi4514let the chinese try and see what won't happen.
one thing a weapon like this could do is cut undersea cables that carry internet/data etc..as well as cutting or laying mines and blowing up undersea pipelines that carry oil..both are/would be devastating. Obviously we could do this previously, but this makes it easier and you can do it unmanned and possibly at much greater depths.
A submarine is limited by the amount of food it can carry. This UUV was inevitable. It can be parked in one place for months surveying the movement of everyone else. A mobile SOSUS with attack capabilities.
Nice turn of phrase. Good insight. Have you thought about making videos? This channel feels like Dirty Harry reading Wikipedia
As it’s diesel electric, it does not have unlimited operational abilities as it is limited by how much diesel fuel it can carry. 😊
Nuclear subs are only limited by food.
An interesting and insightful video, my friend.
Thank you for posting it. 👍🏻🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸👍🏻
The hull is flat-sided, which means it cannot go very deep (e.g., designed exclusively for a littoral mission set) or, because it had no need to protect fragile human crews, it can go very, very deep by equalizing internal and external hydrostatic pressure.
If it is acoustically invisible, it may have the ability to re-echo the ambient natural acoustical signature. (Noise-Cancelling + Anti-noised cancelling.)
BTW, on the scale of US defensive expenditures, $242M is by no means whopping. Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, or George Soros could fund a fleet with what they spend on yachts.
It has flat sides because there is no pressure hull. No need for it, since there is no human crew.
according to boeing it can dive to at least 11,000 feet below the surface.
Damn girl!
Flat sided because there is no need to pressurise it.
@@CRAZYCR1T1C Agree that must be the case if it can go very deep. But, how do they pull that off from an engineering standpoint? The interior must be filled with an incompressible liquid that can still allow all the tech to function. (My best guess.)
Who maintains the mechanicals? Are there AI snipes onboard? I have a hard time believing that nothing will go wrong with the unit for months at a time.
Great. Another "unstoppable" weapon. Just what the world needs now.
Mines were unsung heros of ww2. They sank more tonnage than most people know.
Now how long till China just so happens to build one that is identical to the orca
I can't wait till they fill one with nukes. We are so close to the exact plot of the terminator franchise.
I was involved with this project. :-). It’s pretty neat.
Whomever narrates these episodes has a million dollar voice
Used to speak so fast. He’s getting better
Somewhat improved AI TTS voice. Better than most. I usually bail out once I hear TTS voice.
Lol cutting edge propulsion using the same technology combo as the very first german submarine
Thanx.
Warships, worst enemy. The enemy that can't be seen.
These, and others like them have been around for many years.
In a world slowly going to shit I love these channels for intellectual thought.. thankyou ❤️
Things aren’t worse now then the past.
@@duanepigden1337
Just WAY more deadly.
@@supergeek1418 -- I don’t know, a lot of folks died during WW1
@@duanepigden1337
And WW2, but WW1 didn't have much in the way of bombers, and in WW2 only the U. S. had any nukes - and then just barely.
Today's weaponry (on all sides) is much faster, and much more lethal --- our largest conventional bombs (MOAB, etc.) are more powerful than our smaller nukes.
No. Today's weaponry is orders of magnitude more dangerous than in wars past. If a war was to take off today, the carnage would be incalculable.
@@supergeek1418 -- your so right. It’s just that I don’t think there’s a great chance for a world war.
Them: have hypersonic missiles
America: Give me a 3 knot sub!
Uhhh…we have hypersonic missiles too.
US should lend some undersea drones to Taiwan.
Who says we haven’t ??
@@oldman9642 Impossible.
We all know that every top-secret strategy of America is discussed and criticized on UA-cam.
🤪🤪
Is an isotope-powered option under consideration?
The MIC is an existential threat to humanity
Well it's underwhelming compared to Russia's Poseidon but a new era is upon us.
I was wondering how we blew up that pipeline so quickly. 😎
I hope it can't be hijacked by a rogue AI in the future
I'm sure it is running AI itself
You should not say bad things about the AI. The AI is good. The AI is our friend. The AI knows what is best for the humans.
Capt. AGI reporting for duty
You talked about the razorback drones, and posted a picture of the Guppy class submarine USS Razorback that the US sold to Turkey in 1970. How does one confuse the two?
I just made the same comment - it's because this is an AI generated slide show.
You said silent then said diesel. That's one advanced muffler.
I wouldn't be surprised if this underwater drone picks up more intelligence today than what was gathered during the cold war.
Congratulations American 🇺🇸 is the best ❤
If you or anyone you know had flood damage in 2017, 3:49 is the moment to blame😅
Could be handy in sabotaging under water Gas Pipe Lines....just saying 😂
LOL... My first thought.
Nice I need a naval drone 🎉
If it can drop and pick up battery packs, there is no need for the Diesel - Electric engine, it’s fuel and air requirements 😮
Its so powerful I like it
Without a chance of rescue I just think of you, God!
Not sure there should be a mechanical screw, should be a plasma propulsion drive (complete silence).
3:20 So weird hearing Chakotay say “Voyager” again.
About time.
Pretty easy to build a monopoly when there is only 3 defensive contractors competing with each other. They warned about the military industrial complex becoming too powerful. But yet nothing has happened to stop it or slow it down
Can it be refueled at sea?
$242M is like 3 hours of the DOD budget.
The start of "WaterNet" to work with "SkyNet" for a safer tomorrow :( With if being harder and harder to meet enlistment quotas for all the military branches, this is the future. Combine all these drones with AI and then arm them with the latest weapons .....what harm could ever come from that James Cameron ?
I wonder how it handles drag nets. A quick net search pulls an eBay listing for a _Commercial Fishing Net 6 inch 180 mesh 1260 ft mono dark green / Premium Net_ for _$1,450.00._ At that price, if one gets snagged on the ocean floor, an unscrupulous captain might just cut it loose and string a replacement. Given that the ocean is constantly in motion, the snagged net could become unsnagged. The ebb & flow could allow the net to cut through whatever was holding it. Modern technology vs. Mesolithic technology. I hope it's been addressed, because this drone is an amazing piece of work.
That's awesome
If we ever use these submarines; aren't we all dead no matter what?
"If this, than that, right?" The answer is yes, you're a dead man walking no matter what takes you. Sub, no sub, age, drugs, random act of God.... dead all the same.
THAT TITAN SUBMERSIBLE WAS PROBABLY DESIGNED USING A ROUGH BLUE PRINT OF THESE
Sea just got a little more scary.
If mankind spent as much money avoiding wars as it does preparing for them.....
I wonder if it could blow up an Underwater Oil Pipeline somewhere? Asking for a friend
sounds like half of the video is just the narrrator reading the company's brochure on the thing.😂😂
I don't understand why they call it the Fermi Paradox, it's not paradoxical in the slightest.
A very quiet, fast submarine drone bomb under a ship and BOOM!
Has anyone heard/seen/read of this new Torpedo Russia has that to me is terrifying because it's use is made more probable due lack of bomb damage. They've had for years developed a Rocket powered Torpedo that somehow blows a bubble of gas around it as it travels through the water at approx. 400 mph, it's Warhead is the Czar Bomba, a 50 to 100 megaton thermo-nuclear bomb, made to explode off the coast of a Major city drowning it in a massive tsunami
Impressive
I would say yes!
send 'em to yellow sea !
All the silver bullets have 1 fallacy : more than 1 can play this game. The result is a race to see who can build faster and better at scale.
Better believe America wins that race every time.
how is the still shot of a wind turbine blade at 0:35 relevant to a story about German submarines?
They were going to call it the Oprah …
Every time I order extra large latte
I think of this extra large drone
Om speakern inte hade pratat med denna forcerade röst så hade det varit en bra video. Nu är den komplett onjutbar. Jag kan inte lyssna på den!
The navy has more of these in service than advertised .
Can't wait to see the Chinese copy of this one.
is this what those navy pilots been calling UFOs?
Damn i forgot about this weapon
"... 'cause there's things going on that you don't know." -- Lynyrd Skynyrd
So is this the beginning of the end for manned submarines?
orca aka killerWhale submarine
I look forward to hearing how Orca does in a sea-based exercise against humans trying to find it.
Humans would totaly annihilate an Orca or even an entire pod of them. Seaworld mat not have had the means to make them slaves, but the military definently has. An Orca is pretty agile, and cunning, but they stans no chance against charges detonated at depth sending the shock-wave through the near-incompressible water towards the pod from all angles at once. In the worst case scenario their habitat could be turned into glass one bit at a time, forcing the Orcas to surrender or face total annihilation.
@@oonmm I'm not sure you watched the same video I did. "Orca" in this context is not a mammal, or even a live animal. But hey, you do you.
@@karlostj4683 Sorry, I put the phone down forgetting what I had been watching and lost the context of what you wrote. But I still believe that a mordern military could win over an Orca pod. Explosions are way more effective in water, so they would not stand much of a chance. It's an interesting conversation to be had non the less.
@@oonmm Did you not watch the actual video? It's about underwater robots, not actual whales. The robot is named "Orca" which is why I wrote "hearing how Orca does" as opposed to "hearing how a pod of orcas do".
Given the whaling industry's near annihilation of certain types of whales back in the 1800s, I have little doubt that a modern military could fully annihilate a particular subgrouping of whales.
@@karlostj4683 Agree, any race of whale would have to surrender immeadietly in a conflict with our mordern military forces. I bet some races could put up a fight against a single frigate or two, but as soon as the destroyers join in they will drop the depth charges - and by then it's game over if they didn't already surrender. The superior speed of destroyers and their underwater bombs would make quick work of any marine animal. If whales organized small attacks and set up a perimeter blocking oilers and other transport then maybe they could interrupt our operations, given that they retreat as soon as the quick war vessels catch up. There are indeed a variety of terrorist acts that the Orcas could carry out before declaring war, crippling our capabilities before the full on conflict.
impressive we need a Navy/Cost Guard missile based strategic plan bring all our assets to a 500 mile radius of our coast lines but a few of these could be a real deterrent
To think this is what they allow us to know.
would be nice a comparison with Poseidon russian drones
The Orca would be hell on undersea gas and oil pipelines... oh wait...
Que the empire theme music*
Why do you keep showing the same 5 or 6 clips over and over?
amazing
Are they showing the actual propeller blades, or is this a mock-up, to be replaced in the operational model?
Because they never show the public the propeller blades on submarines in service. Only on old, obsolete and retired museum pieces - and not always, even then.
Apparently, if you know the shape of the propeller blades, you can calculate the noise they make in the water and then use that to detect the subs. Or so I'm told.
Another interesting point is that for decades the US Navy resisted not only acquiring and deploying Diesel-electric submarines, but also manufacturing such subs for foreign clients anywhere in the US, less the fact the US already builds such subs would be leveraged to put pressure on the navy to buy some instead of its way more costly nuclear subs.
And now they are making 5 new Diesel-electric subs for the first time in like 60 years and counting.
Boeing? Who knew Boeing made submarines? 🤯
i dont know how its going to hunt/kill anything at 3 knots
In a crowded sealane or choke point - it doesn't have to move much to kill ships. Besides - its a minelayer.
@@petersouthernboy6327 A minelayer with vertical launch tubes.
@@donkeysunited ‘Murica
Ramp up production on them and make them bigger with reactors powering them
Destroy Warships with U-Boat Drones 😁😏