Asking "WHICH TR" to a CT Advocate! Talking with MARK WARD about the TEXTUS RECEPTUS!

Today I'm talking with Mark Ward about the "Which TR" question and what are perceived as some of the shortfalls of TR only advocacy. We touch on a number of elements of Confessional Bibliology and take a deep dive into some of the arguments produced by the "Receveid Text" position.
This video is Part 1, be sure to check out:
Part 2 - • Assessing TR Advocacy ...
Be sure to check out Mark Ward's channel:
/ mlward038
~~~ CONTENTS ~~~
0:00 Introduction
0:42 Mark Ward's TR Pick
2:27 Mark's article that pressed the 'which TR' article
3:24 Jots and Tittles
4:38 The difference between Dr Riddle and Dr Van Kleeck Jr.
5:42 Mark compares Dr Riddle and Dr Van Kleeck's position
6:50 The more sanctified you are, the better your Bible is?
8:49 The TR isn't jot and tittle perfect
9:47 TR has thought alot about the Theological argument for their position
10:58 The evedential side of the CT Argument, but lacking a theological framework.
11:41 point 1, the church has no centralized control
13:10 point 2, major wrinkles in the TR advocacy theology
16:10 point 3, the Bible in the hands of the church and not the academy?
18:43 Acedemia came from the church.
19:53 Textual critics love and serve the church
#TextusReceptus #MarkWard #WhichTR