Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

Why is Phenomenology a Hermeneutics? | Heidegger - Being and Time

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 сер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 15

  • @SingularityasSublimity
    @SingularityasSublimity  2 роки тому +1

    To support this work, please consider becoming a Patreon member for this channel at www.patreon.com/SingularSublime where you can obtain transcripts and unedited materials or by providing a one-time time tip through the "Super Thanks" option above. Thank you!

  • @stephenanastasi748
    @stephenanastasi748 Рік тому +2

    I totally love the way you go about these talks. They are sooo helping me to understand philosophy and to see what I need to do to complete my own work on the origin. Thank you so much.

  • @satanscrow8016
    @satanscrow8016 2 роки тому +3

    Four stars. You pack a lot of meat in these short videos. Currently reading Being and Time and find second, third, fourth, or fifth opinions illuminating. Really think this big book needs more than one read...

  • @User10980m
    @User10980m Місяць тому

    Tanks of thanks❤

  • @garyratcliff2480
    @garyratcliff2480 Рік тому

    Brilliant. Thank you you couldn’t tell me what the works are that the other parts of the proposed book are covered in? If you do that later no problem. Currently reading B & T and these short videos are are great help for my clarity. Thank you.

    • @SingularityasSublimity
      @SingularityasSublimity  Рік тому +1

      thank you, my understanding is that this “unwritten part” was going to be a shift from a focus on Dasein, the being for whom Being is a question, to Being itself. I think some have claimed that parts of this may be in his essay “What is Metaphysics?” and may perhaps ultimately culminate in his latter lectures published as “Time and Being.” the reversal of terms gives a hint of the “turning” that occurred in his own thinking.

  • @julesjgreig
    @julesjgreig 3 роки тому +1

    Very good, thank you

  • @satanscrow8016
    @satanscrow8016 2 роки тому +3

    As for his Nazism, he surrendered to the They of his time and remained inauthentic, for the rest of his life, in commitment to the They_ which for him meant, Germany (guess he really loved the Black Forest). Who knows?
    But I agree, he is a super mind.
    My own opinion? Heidegger's is God's revenge on the hubris of Western, so called rational man. Some think God doesn't have jokes; yes She does.

    • @SingularityasSublimity
      @SingularityasSublimity  2 роки тому

      Its a legit interpretation from within his own thinking. Levinas went a different direction and seemed to find Heidegger’s prioritization on the existentiality of Dasein to resonate with Heidegger’s politics at that time. “Who knows” is right.

    • @satanscrow8016
      @satanscrow8016 2 роки тому +1

      @@SingularityasSublimity Yeah. You'd think he would have known better. Finished my first reading of Being and Time today. Definitely a book that requires rereading.

  • @artlessons1
    @artlessons1 2 роки тому +1

    Heidegger did in fact choice to join the natzis.
    As existential goes he has to take responsibility for that choice . He thought Germany had a special thing going for them and he wanted to be a part of it . He was well aware of the horror though by being a existentialist / phenomenology he never saw outside the box .
    He was consciously of what was going on. Guilty as charged .
    Hegel and Nietzsche work was used for horrendous events in history though did not make a personal conscious choice to do so .

    • @SingularityasSublimity
      @SingularityasSublimity  2 роки тому

      Absolutely, and I think comments made in the black notebooks only solidifies that conclusion. The only question left is to what degree those facts have any relationship with the philosophy of B&T

  • @aqsakhan4338
    @aqsakhan4338 9 місяців тому

    Quite difficult for me to understand 😭