Who is Dasein? | Heidegger - Being and Time | Phenomenology

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 тра 2021
  • Welcome to Back to the Texts Themselves, a series on phenomenology. Today I examine Part I of the introduction to Being & Time.
    In this video, I address the following questions
    1) What is Being?
    2) Why should we inquire into its meaning?
    3) Who is Dasein?
    #phenomenology #Heidegger #Dasein #Being #ontology #ontological #ontic #existential #existentiell

КОМЕНТАРІ • 20

  • @SingularityasSublimity
    @SingularityasSublimity  2 роки тому

    To support this work, please consider becoming a Patreon member for this channel at www.patreon.com/SingularSublime where you can obtain transcripts and unedited materials or by providing a one-time time tip through the "Super Thanks" option above. Thank you!

  • @simongrolercher6263
    @simongrolercher6263 2 роки тому +4

    best english Being and Time introduction I've seen so far. the fact that you are able to explain it so accessible and simple shows how well founded your understanding of it is. great job! The "Da" in Dasein is probably best translated as "open" or "disclosed". :) (side note: on my profile pic I'm standing in front of Heidegger's childhood home in Messkirch)

    • @SingularityasSublimity
      @SingularityasSublimity  2 роки тому

      Thank you for that feedback! And for the helpful guidance on the meaning of “da” , that would make a lot more sense in light of the concept itself (admittedly I did a little too much thinking out loud at that part of the video. :))

  • @24434sa
    @24434sa 2 роки тому +1

    Excellent. I'm glad this got recommended to me and I like how you tackle each part by part.

    • @SingularityasSublimity
      @SingularityasSublimity  2 роки тому +2

      Thank you! I figured there are enough 10-min summaries out there already and too many lengthy in-depth analyses as well. I’m hoping this strikes the right balance.

  • @KristianMMilne
    @KristianMMilne Рік тому

    Thank you! Great job.

  • @ieBrazil
    @ieBrazil 2 роки тому

    Wow. What a class. Thanks. Thanks a lot for the examples and explanation. This video deserves wayy more views!

  • @nomadproductions5473
    @nomadproductions5473 2 роки тому +1

    Comparatively, far more insightful. Appreciated.

  • @CienciayEPsicologia
    @CienciayEPsicologia 7 місяців тому

    Good 👍

  • @jorgeherreradeleon6508
    @jorgeherreradeleon6508 2 роки тому

    Hi First of all, thank you for taking the time to go over this not-so-accessible texts. Greatly appreciated to those of us who are attracted to philosophy. I am reading *Being and Time* along with your mini lectures and I am struggling with a specific word: comport. Could you please dedicate some time to elaborate on what Heidegger might possibly mean by "comport" in such a passage as: "That kind of Being towards Dasein can comport itself in one war or another, and always does comport itself somehow, we call existence".
    Thanks!

    • @SingularityasSublimity
      @SingularityasSublimity  2 роки тому

      Thank you for your comment. To understand Heidegger's use of the term 'comportment,' it may be helpful to go to Merleau-Ponty, where it becomes a much more central notion. For Merleau-Ponty, it has a meaning close to Husserl's notion of intentionality. I believe Heidegger might mean something similar here. However, intentionality may be understood as being limited to the mental, whereas comportment is a kind of bodily intentionality that involves the entirety of one's being. Another important aspect of Heidegger's use of the term, I think, is that it concerns the concrete actualization of those possibilities available to us through our spatiality and the horizons therein. Hope that offers some preliminary clarification. I'll pay attention to when it comes up again next in the readings and see if anything else can be added to this.

  • @sammelamed7311
    @sammelamed7311 2 роки тому

    Thanks!

  • @avatardreamz9416
    @avatardreamz9416 7 місяців тому

    thank you

  • @tesafilm8447
    @tesafilm8447 Місяць тому

    If Dasein is being that is defined by its existence and existence is being in its relation to Dasein (those are just the definitions) then Dasein is being that is defined by its relation to Dasein, which is just the identity relation and kind of obvious?

  • @yusefnajm3648
    @yusefnajm3648 Рік тому

    Can you help me...
    In the question of: What is Being in general.. or as such?
    Did Heidegger answer this question?

  • @HeatherWatson006
    @HeatherWatson006 Рік тому

    Thought as truth?

  • @stagemaker8869
    @stagemaker8869 9 місяців тому

    Thanks!