Greatest Philosophers in History | Martin Heidegger

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 192

  • @Eternalised
    @Eternalised  3 роки тому +29

    Enjoy these type of videos? Please give it a like
    Support this channel: www.patreon.com/eternalised
    UA-cam Member Perks: ua-cam.com/channels/qos1tl0RntucGGtPXNxkkA.htmljoin
    Donate a Coffee: ko-fi.com/eternalised
    PayPal: www.paypal.com/paypalme/eternalisedofficial
    Official Merch: eternalised.creator-spring.com

  • @shengcer
    @shengcer 2 роки тому +31

    In Taoism, it is famously said “The immortal rule can not be told; the forever name can not be named…” I think Heidegger invented so many words for the same reason. His thought is at the very edge of what language could express. Great video, it is a shame this series seems to end here.

    • @Jide-bq9yf
      @Jide-bq9yf Рік тому +1

      I agree . You don’t need to read much Heidegger if you’re focused on our temporality as much as he advocates . Then the gates of Being open up and an authentic existence is the only path we’ll want to tread . There’ll be no room for anything else .

  • @jk.studios
    @jk.studios 3 роки тому +21

    This channel WILL blow up. Just remember, to remember us, those who are here who pushed this channel up. Truly

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 роки тому +9

      Thank you! Your support means a lot to me. You guys are what keeps this channel alive :)

    • @satnamo
      @satnamo 3 роки тому +3

      I do not know why
      but it feels good
      to blow things up
      sometimes.

    • @mjolninja9358
      @mjolninja9358 3 роки тому +1

      Correction: SHALL*

    • @satnamo
      @satnamo 3 роки тому +1

      @@mjolninja9358 mistake is natural
      But regret is foolish.

    • @MiloMay
      @MiloMay Рік тому +3

      And it did!

  • @naseempark6135
    @naseempark6135 3 роки тому +8

    Finally, I’ve been waiting for this one.

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 роки тому +3

      Thanks for the support Naseem!

    • @naseempark6135
      @naseempark6135 3 роки тому +2

      @@Eternalised yeah, this must have taken an insane amount of work. Also congrats on 4K subs

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 роки тому +3

      @@naseempark6135 I did over-work myself quite a lot haha. Thanks a lot! :)

    • @satnamo
      @satnamo 3 роки тому +1

      @@Eternalised he who loves what he does
      Wears himself out doing it.

  • @Garghamellal
    @Garghamellal 3 роки тому +15

    You always edit brilliantly with appropriate music and appropriate images which convey the right feeling

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 роки тому +4

      Thanks a lot Garghamellal, means a lot to me!

    • @satnamo
      @satnamo 3 роки тому +1

      There are more fine arts in the world
      Than in eternalised videos.
      There are more great artists in the world than in Europe.
      There are more idols in the world
      Than in reality.

  • @jayabyss377
    @jayabyss377 3 роки тому +50

    this sounds like non-dualism philosophy, awesome!

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 роки тому +21

      Yep, object and subject are one. Non dualism at it's finest :)

    • @satnamo
      @satnamo 3 роки тому +6

      Emptiness is das truth because das truth is empty.
      Empty of what ?
      Empty of its own existence because we are 1!
      Emptiness is a vessel because every vessel is empty.
      Empty this boat so that it will go faster because it is lighter.

    • @bitkurd
      @bitkurd 2 роки тому

      The observer is the observed. You can not perceive yourself through your eyes, you can only perceive yourself through someone else’s eyes.

    • @Jide-bq9yf
      @Jide-bq9yf Рік тому

      Definitely

    • @Jide-bq9yf
      @Jide-bq9yf Рік тому

      @@Eternalisedmy sublimely articulate philosopher, hope you’re good . Relishing this gourmet serving once again .

  • @PhilosophyToons
    @PhilosophyToons 3 роки тому +20

    I was super excited for this one and it was great! Being in Time must've been a tough read but also very rewarding.

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 роки тому +5

      Thanks!! I'm glad you liked it my friend

  • @celestilbernas972
    @celestilbernas972 3 роки тому +5

    This is a great channel to everyone who wants or interested in these philosophers. Sometimes, I get bored with professors discussing these things (don't get me wrong, I learned). I like the narrator's voice, not too fast and I get to digest every detail without me having a good background of studying a philosophy class. Just a curious reader here!

  • @leniepenie3419
    @leniepenie3419 3 роки тому +11

    Man I love this channel everything is so well put and easy to understand!

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 роки тому +2

      Thanks a lot Lenie for the uplifting words!!

  • @InfinitiSin
    @InfinitiSin 3 роки тому +17

    My Dasein shall be to enjoy this fantastic upload.
    Also, this being a reminder to finish reading Being and Time.

  • @Bkesal14
    @Bkesal14 2 місяці тому

    Thank you for rendering these phenomenal ideas so accessibly! I really appreciate it.

  • @The_Wanderer_And_His_Shadow
    @The_Wanderer_And_His_Shadow 3 роки тому +5

    Thank you for the good content! Because of works like that one, youtube is worth existing. I wish you many more subscribers. Greetings from Bulgaria!

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 роки тому +1

      Thanks a lot for your kind wishes!

  • @stevenwonder7585
    @stevenwonder7585 3 роки тому +4

    Great channel, keep up the good work!

  • @Davlavi
    @Davlavi 2 роки тому +1

    This channel deserves way more likes. Keep up the great videos.

  • @debanjanchowdhury4397
    @debanjanchowdhury4397 2 роки тому +4

    Phenomenology is really an abstract and complicated concept. It's a demanding task to comprehend and grasp the intrinsic meaning of this concept. But it's really a fascinating and enthralling concept through which we can learn how to speculate our milieu.

  • @jkam2524
    @jkam2524 2 роки тому +1

    Hey! You helped me finally understand Heidegger!!! Thank you!

  • @lorenz6660
    @lorenz6660 3 роки тому +6

    Muy buen video, gracias por seguir subiendo contenido 👌

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 роки тому +3

      ¡Gracias por el apoyo Lorenz!

  • @InspirationFromThePast
    @InspirationFromThePast 3 роки тому +14

    Wow, the intro was very well done, loved it. Also I don't think that I heard about him before so thank you for bringing him to my attention and as always, your narration is pure gold. Congratulations on 4k Subscribers.

  • @gclttlaichhun2262
    @gclttlaichhun2262 3 роки тому +4

    Great job..... Keep up the good work❤❤❤❤

    • @satnamo
      @satnamo 3 роки тому +2

      There is no fire like passion.

  • @renzostefanmp7937
    @renzostefanmp7937 3 роки тому +6

    Heidegger is my favorite philosopher, it's glad to see him in this channel, saved this video to watch it in a couple of hours when I get free, I'm excited. Thanks!. Btw, I came from the Dostoevsky video, which was really great. I'm sure you'll get a lot of subscribers in the future.

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 роки тому +3

      Thank you very much! And welcome to the channel.

    • @bukurie6861
      @bukurie6861 3 роки тому +3

      Martin Heidegger is Greatest Philosophers in History.He is human beings a modern epoch.Dasein is doing existencialal transformation Cultural.🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠!

  • @Dacademeca
    @Dacademeca 3 роки тому +50

    Martin Heidegger was such an interesting philosopher.. I feel like he deserves more attention, great video and editing, and congrats on 4000 subs!

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 роки тому +6

      Thanks a lot my friend!

    • @Garghamellal
      @Garghamellal 3 роки тому +2

      4000 subs?

    • @Dacademeca
      @Dacademeca 3 роки тому +2

      @@Garghamellal ya he got 4000 subs

    • @thetaeater
      @thetaeater 2 роки тому

      Heidegger was a crackpot charlatan like most of these 19th and early 20th centry philosophers. He is just twisting theology philosophy. The comment that mentions how it sounds like non-dualism is kinda contract except when you actually read his work he makes it sound like the individual is god (solipsism). Its funny because I Love Tilich's work but he is at least genuine. Back before the information age it was so easy to reframe a concept to make it like an original idea.

    • @vlnow
      @vlnow Рік тому

      He was the only philosopher to blow my mind.
      I think 'we' don't talk about him much because of his later political alliances. Its almost taboo.

  • @rickbenjamin1525
    @rickbenjamin1525 3 роки тому +3

    Very good explained

  • @AdamFraserTv
    @AdamFraserTv 2 роки тому

    It’s been awhile since I’ve been excited by a piece of literature . Thank you for familiarizing me with this man . Way ahead of his time .

  • @frankchilds9848
    @frankchilds9848 Рік тому

    Thanks for this video gem 💎 I feel Heidegger can help many of us in our current time where we seem to have become unhinged from much we trusted before.

  • @PsychedelicActualization
    @PsychedelicActualization 3 роки тому +19

    'The Fieldpath' was the first thing I read from Heidegger. Such an amazing dude ❤️

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 роки тому +5

      Cool, will take a look at that one! Thanks

  • @surajchaudhary613
    @surajchaudhary613 3 роки тому +5

    do deleuze and guattari too, excellent work as usual! keep it up

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 роки тому +8

      Thanks. Good suggestions Suraj. I'll be eventually be doing some post-modernism and psychoanalysis as well: Derrida, Lacan, Deleuze and Baudrillard. Although I have a lot of reading to do!

    • @surajchaudhary613
      @surajchaudhary613 3 роки тому +4

      @@Eternalised looking forward to it !

  • @Orion225
    @Orion225 3 роки тому +1

    Great explanation. Enjoyed it thoroughly. You got a new subs. 👍

  • @tshibamo7971
    @tshibamo7971 Рік тому

    Oh man this is so well thought out content

  • @dasociety129113
    @dasociety129113 2 роки тому +1

    This philosopher seems so deeply arcane in his observations, very difficuly to understand, my brain was twisting through that whole video. Thanks again for your great videos

  • @TheKagar
    @TheKagar Рік тому

    Thank you for Upload :)

  • @fraidoonw
    @fraidoonw 3 роки тому +4

    thanks dear Eternalised! yes Heidegger is extremely difficult to understand. this episode helps us to understand some fragments of his philosophy in a rather simpler way. This is better explained than the episode on Nietzsche.

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 роки тому +3

      Glad it was helpful! :)

    • @fraidoonw
      @fraidoonw 3 роки тому +2

      @@Eternalised all videos are great! thanks!

    • @adaptercrash
      @adaptercrash 2 роки тому +1

      That's the whole point of the book. It's funny that way.

  • @titnesovic4522
    @titnesovic4522 11 місяців тому

    Thank you for this work. Heidegger seems to be more popular with each passing day.

  • @samn8309
    @samn8309 Рік тому +1

    I was using my axe as a hammer. It broke. While I was experiencing ready-at-hand with the axe I'd have been better off with some present-at-hand first. Now I'm left with a broken axe which is a problem and I'm experiencing unreadiness-to-hand.
    Now I get it.

  • @satnamo
    @satnamo 3 роки тому +5

    Authenticity means living my own most potential for being in timespace.

  • @FGP_Pro
    @FGP_Pro Рік тому +1

    Martin Heidegger, the Rube Goldberg of philosophy.

  • @BJCobbledick
    @BJCobbledick 3 роки тому +3

    I love so much of the art in your videos! Would it be possible for you to post the names of the works?

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 роки тому +1

      Thanks! I actually deleted my art folders cause I was running low on space. But if you like some in particular, I'll try to find them!

  • @damaplehound
    @damaplehound Рік тому +4

    Drinking game: take a shot every time the word "being" is mentioned

  • @ejwoods2457
    @ejwoods2457 2 роки тому

    This is great! I’m actually trying to navigate my way through Being and Time which has proven profoundly difficult and rewarding. But this summary is enlightening. It helps me to have the entire structure and goal of the text “present-to-hand.”

    • @vlnow
      @vlnow Рік тому

      I tried to read the original text. Its just way way too nuts. Intead i read a simple introduction to his ideas.

  • @DeadEndFrog
    @DeadEndFrog 3 роки тому +7

    im always amazed how someone like him could embrace fascism, proably a huge reason for hannah arendts own philosophical inquires

  • @SeanLucasYT
    @SeanLucasYT 3 роки тому +6

    All your videos interest me, but I was wondering, how did you get into this? Study it in university?

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 роки тому +9

      Thanks Sean. I study it as a passion :)

    • @satnamo
      @satnamo 3 роки тому +2

      @@Eternalised without passion
      Existence is impossible.

  • @jamiejones9156
    @jamiejones9156 2 роки тому +1

    "I am. And there is thinking."
    - Ram Dass

  • @ratherrapid
    @ratherrapid 3 роки тому +2

    This becomes even more intereseting when reading Hanna Arendt, who, from what I've seen runs intellectual circles around H.

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 роки тому +1

      Interesting, will have a look. Thank you.

  • @thecatmagnet2978
    @thecatmagnet2978 2 роки тому

    Excellent video

  • @paulkossak7761
    @paulkossak7761 2 роки тому

    I just purchased "being and time" and looking forward to dig in. I'm sure it will be extremely challenging.

  • @satnamo
    @satnamo 3 роки тому +3

    Nothing is being because
    everything is interbeing
    since we are 1
    for everything is interconnected and interdependent on every ‘other’ things
    as demonstrated by Young Double Slit experiment,
    where the observer is inseparable from the observed electrons.

  • @danauckland9816
    @danauckland9816 3 роки тому +2

    Can anyone tell me the name of the artist at 8:07? I would like to get a copy.

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 роки тому +3

      "Erosion" created in 2000 by Jacek Yerka in Surrealism style.

    • @danauckland9816
      @danauckland9816 3 роки тому +2

      @@Eternalised Thank you so much. I haven't come across his work before. Excellent interpretations of life's oddities imo. Love it. Thanks again. I am the author of 'Hannelore' - a slightly different take on the final months of WWII written in English.

  • @deepthin7480
    @deepthin7480 3 роки тому +2

    Please make a video on Simone de Beauvoir . She deserves to be in the list. And honestly I have very less regard for Heidegger for his Nazism but I will try to see beyond that

  •  2 роки тому

    I feel like I'll need to rewatch this video a couple of times until I make some sense of it

  • @onewithall6946
    @onewithall6946 2 місяці тому

    The designation of "greatest philosophers in human history" raises an eyebrow, particularly when we note the predominant European representation among them. It’s a rich oxymoron wrapped in sweeping generalisations, highlighting the irony that some of history's most profound thinkers weren’t always the most inclusive. Such a reflection reminds us that philosophy, like the world it seeks to understand, is far more diverse than a single narrative can capture.

  • @RomancingTheData
    @RomancingTheData 2 роки тому +1

    It sounds like Nietzsche and Heidegger should have a conversation; they have pretty similar ideas regarding conformity.

  • @bitkurd
    @bitkurd 2 роки тому +1

    I am the center of circumference, therefore, I can not perceive myself through my eyes. I can only observe myself through someone else’s eyes.

  • @GSingh12345
    @GSingh12345 Рік тому

    Could you please suggest the primary books to read about Heidegger and his theories???

  • @nadeemf3426
    @nadeemf3426 3 роки тому +1

    can you make a video on rene girard?

  • @rishinarinemd
    @rishinarinemd Рік тому

    Thanks for this great video! Does anyone know what the symbol on the front of the book means or what it is called? (18:51/24:15)

  • @joelvalentine3291
    @joelvalentine3291 2 роки тому

    It is well explained, Can I get this word document.

  • @davidotten2379
    @davidotten2379 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks for finding kairos for Heidegger.

  • @dortesandal4303
    @dortesandal4303 3 роки тому +1

    This Guy makes me highly neurotic and unusually self aware😵😂👍

  • @Henningfest
    @Henningfest 3 роки тому

    What is the single frame at 4:48?

    • @Henningfest
      @Henningfest 3 роки тому

      Seems to be an out of focus picture of a group of people.
      What significance does it have?

  • @insidethewired
    @insidethewired 2 роки тому

    amazing

  • @adaptercrash
    @adaptercrash 2 роки тому

    Im surprised this hasn't been written like 200 years ago, well more than that..800...

  • @metaspacecrownedbytime4579
    @metaspacecrownedbytime4579 Рік тому

    I find it difficult to apply this thought on my own, as an individual.

  • @B4no_shyyrosss
    @B4no_shyyrosss Рік тому

    Can someone explain the difference of being in the world and being with others

  • @IntoTheEtherReal
    @IntoTheEtherReal 2 роки тому +1

    Great video!
    I especially liked how you brought up Heidegger's controversy. If anybody wants to explore this notion in more detail and from a philosophical perspective I have a video about it up on my channel (end of shameless plug haha)

  • @Nunofurbiznus
    @Nunofurbiznus Рік тому

    This has SOOOOOOO many ties to Pageaus work lol

  • @mac2phin
    @mac2phin 3 роки тому +2

    Regarding Heidegger's nazism, I like Woody Allen's films, but he married his daughter.

  • @magrayfayaz1478
    @magrayfayaz1478 2 роки тому

    Great

  • @RinatNugayev
    @RinatNugayev 6 місяців тому

    12:47

  • @alecmisra4964
    @alecmisra4964 3 роки тому +2

    Didnt heidegger become a "das man" at one point?

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 роки тому +3

      I'm unaware of this, since that is what he tells us to avoid.

    • @simongrolercher6263
      @simongrolercher6263 3 роки тому +5

      @@Eternalised No, his remarks about das Man are not to be taken morally-oncticly, in terms of what we "ought to do". Man is an ontological structure of Dasein and not something to be rejected. But other than that I very much enjoyed your video. Thank you! Also I loved the art!

    • @satnamo
      @satnamo 3 роки тому +2

      Yes when he becomes a nazi!

    • @BioChemistryWizard
      @BioChemistryWizard Рік тому

      @@satnamo Being authentic does not mean being extremely individualistic.

  • @geoffreynhill2833
    @geoffreynhill2833 3 роки тому

    Bloody hell! Zeno's Tortoise? A Young Person's Guide to Granularity? Still, he manages to LOOK very knowing in his photographs...

  • @onlypearls4651
    @onlypearls4651 Рік тому

    When the hammer breaks, it becomes a tent stake, and a fishing weight.

  • @tristink332
    @tristink332 2 роки тому

    17:43

  • @marcpadilla1094
    @marcpadilla1094 2 роки тому

    Being There or a man for all.seasons is a movie about phenomenology or Heideggers' Desein .Stars Peter Sellers as a simpleton who's caretaker has died. Fir the first time in his life he's alone and begins to interact with people or rarher they begin to interact with him and because of his condition presume him to be a genius. Any way the philosophical message is authenticity vs inauthenticity. Sellers " Being " authentic in a fake world of great expectations.

    • @stephencarroll230
      @stephencarroll230 2 роки тому

      Yes! And Jerzy Kosinski, the author, was very conscious of mob mentality and the horrors of political violence. Read his other novels! Being There is definitely a critique, or mocking, of Heidegger.

    • @marcpadilla1094
      @marcpadilla1094 2 роки тому

      @@stephencarroll230 Gump also.

  • @debrasmith4675
    @debrasmith4675 2 роки тому

    Wasn’t labelling it “ the biggest stupidity of my life” a global apology give the way Heidegger uses words?
    What other apology would have sufficed?

  • @danlhendl
    @danlhendl Рік тому

    I see the existential not the existentiell, Heidegger. 😅 I see the fallen not the fallenessness

  • @lalsenarath
    @lalsenarath 3 роки тому

    Many subjects = objective

  • @Big-guy1981
    @Big-guy1981 3 роки тому +2

    Sounds like a rehashing of Taoism.

    • @satnamo
      @satnamo 3 роки тому +1

      True.
      He borrows it from
      The book of tea.

  • @ipdavid1043
    @ipdavid1043 Рік тому

    he ix so right about. modern days

  • @deadringer1009
    @deadringer1009 3 роки тому

    darzines?

  • @ryokan9120
    @ryokan9120 3 роки тому +5

    Yet another brilliant video and a truly brilliant philosopher. How unfortunate he turned out to be an unrepentant Nazi.

  • @mattsuran1270
    @mattsuran1270 3 роки тому

    If a wrestler falls in a forest does it count?

  • @rosismordet
    @rosismordet 2 роки тому

    Yo lo perdono, profe Heid. :)

  • @EclecticEngineer604
    @EclecticEngineer604 8 місяців тому

  • @stainsbflowin
    @stainsbflowin 3 роки тому

    Latin is needed more than english in this explanation.

  • @FrankiePanaia
    @FrankiePanaia 2 роки тому +3

    Heidegger NEVER aplogized for his *alleged* nazism, because he followed his own philosophy - he rejected the popularism of the revisionist hysterical herd and the "they," to obey his own authenticity. He should be applauded for his moral courage in this regard.
    On the other hand his entire obscure philosophy, riddled with artificial neologisms and inane analogies, comes across as a neo-Eastern cult! Much faith is required! To be sure, to paraphrase that semitic titan of arrogance, the gay Wittgenstein, if it cant be expressed in language, then its not worth saying.

    • @GilesMcRiker
      @GilesMcRiker Рік тому +1

      There is nothing "alleged"about his Nazism, it is well documented. Heidegger joined the Nazi party, implemented their policies and published statements, both public and privately, that appear to endorse Nazism, and also denigrated Jews in vulgar anti-semitic terms.
      Whether his philosophical statements completely and unequivocally dovetailed with every arcane facet of hackneyed Nazi ideology is an irrelevant question, and not the standard. Nor is it particularly convincing that he once showed kindness by getting a bagel to a Jew.
      We don't doubt Hitler's credentials as a racist simply because he allied himself with the Japanese and other "races".
      When does not flirt with an ideology as reprehensible as Nazism, and one would certainly expect very clear moral and ethical delineation might such and apparently enlightened intellectual.
      It is utterly pathetic that a man who mastered the philosophical Legacy of the West was at best a passive supporter and at worst an enthusiast one of the most cruel destructive and genocidal ideologies in history, without ever providing a convincing accounting of his indefensible positions.
      Far from regarded as some kind of hero or principled conscientious objector, considering his role and status, he is history's sniveling coward and opportunist who acted in a morally vacuous manner at a time when the world couldn't even count on its greatest philosopher to denounce hatred, military conquest and genocide

    • @FrankiePanaia
      @FrankiePanaia Рік тому

      @@GilesMcRiker Does your highly emotive sanctimony also extend to the British and their decadent royals, who collectively, wiped from the face of this planet, over a billion souls in the last 2 centuries? When did that anal-retentive Russell ever denounce the countless evils of his mother Empire?
      In comaprison to the British Empire, (a 1000 times more perfidous and odious than their teutonic cousins), the German NAZIs were a litter of cute puppies.

    • @BioChemistryWizard
      @BioChemistryWizard Рік тому

      @@GilesMcRiker Dasein exists to negate the nothingness, everything else is bullshit fluff. It makes absolutely no sense for Heidegger to apologize being involved in the authentic life of Being, especially when he was destined to go through it. He simply remarked on the stupidity of assuming Hitler wanted to reinvigorate German culture and rural life instead of expansionism. Heidegger was following his own way of life that he wrote. (The right way).

  • @owlnyc666
    @owlnyc666 2 роки тому

    So many "great" philosphers, pholosphers. Each NASA "touch" of "truth". But none have the " complete" truth. Some "resonate" more with with some ....Dasein than others. Some philosophies "resonate" more with.methane others. Stoicism "resonates" the most with me!🤔😉😎

    • @owlnyc666
      @owlnyc666 2 роки тому

      Then there is his....flirtation with the biggest stupidity of his life. 😉😀

  • @arunjetli7909
    @arunjetli7909 7 місяців тому

    It however is non dialectical as Marx was .as Adorno said that Heidegger is lost in a castle of words
    His error is thst he chose Aristotle as his starting point and not Parmenrdes

  • @jaykemm3472
    @jaykemm3472 3 роки тому

    Chili Dogs...…… Did !!!

  • @42_kranthikiran4
    @42_kranthikiran4 Рік тому

    😮

  • @dustydesert1674
    @dustydesert1674 3 роки тому +2

    There’s just that problem of him joining the Nazi Party in 1933 and being anti-Semitic. The halo falls.

  • @shirleybargeman4484
    @shirleybargeman4484 2 місяці тому

    Wilson Amy Johnson James Lopez Cynthia

  • @Dreadwinner
    @Dreadwinner 2 роки тому

    😎

  • @804god
    @804god 3 роки тому

    they

  • @johannbogason1662
    @johannbogason1662 3 роки тому

    utterly self-serving pessimism. great !

  • @livesimplified7970
    @livesimplified7970 3 роки тому +1

    Heideggar how to say very little with a lot of words

    • @alecmisra4964
      @alecmisra4964 3 роки тому +2

      Well said.

    • @satnamo
      @satnamo 3 роки тому +2

      Less words count more because
      More words count less.
      Therefore,
      Simple is beautiful-
      Simple,
      But not too simple.
      Simplicity is das ultimate form of sophistication

  • @johnjepsen4243
    @johnjepsen4243 3 роки тому

    Like all philosophers, i.e. gossip and hearsay. Verbiage. Lol

  • @RobinHerzig
    @RobinHerzig Рік тому

    I want to appreciate the philosophy + separate it from the nazi sh!t but my heart won't let me 😕

  • @justintindall9515
    @justintindall9515 2 місяці тому

    I get kick out of you guys that the world can exist without a principal nature. Your reality in man is so confused

  • @AI-Hallucination
    @AI-Hallucination Рік тому

    His ethics were wrong you can't call him great because as he states in being and time it means nothing, so he means nothing

  • @channel_---
    @channel_--- 2 роки тому

    Too idealistic.and ignores suffering suppression of shadow which seeps into an ever corrupting society Glad it evolved from this.. Yet Its also basically copying buddism just didn't resonate. A hammer isn't something one would handle with muscle memory alone while distracted
    Stating obvious as beings being in time. And dissapointing that I think therefore I am doesn't mean mind over matter.

  • @ricardohernandez5944
    @ricardohernandez5944 3 роки тому

    B e a n