The Hanbali School Part 1: History & Sanad, with Dr. Hatem Alhaj

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 сер 2024
  • In this series, Dr. Hatem enlightens us on the history of the Hanbali school. He then has some frank discussions with Dr. Shadee on theology and sufism in the madhhab. We are very grateful to Dr. Hatem for the time he has taken to join The Safina Society Podcast.
    Check out all our classes & programs at SafinaSociety.org.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 46

  • @riazzaman20
    @riazzaman20 3 роки тому +11

    Jazakallahu khayra for this, sheikh's knowledge is amazing, just to know the history of the mathhab to this extent is astounding. Also humbling to see Shaykh Shady taking notes and taking the opportunity to learn. Please, make this into a series with the other maththib.

  • @shihab2468
    @shihab2468 3 роки тому +9

    Jazakallah khair Shaykhayn for this podcast.
    Correction: Shaykh al-Muwaffaq learnt from Shaykh Abdul Qadir Jilani for 40 days, not 40 years.

  • @zccau2316
    @zccau2316 3 роки тому +19

    This scholar has piety and nur that very few scholars have these days.

  • @SahiehNL
    @SahiehNL 2 роки тому +9

    Am i wrong? Or did you remove the part where the Shaykh mentioned the sanad of Sh Muhammed ibn Abd al Wahhaab in the Hanbali Madhhab?

  • @muaazseedat7989
    @muaazseedat7989 2 роки тому +1

    May Allah bless you Shaykh
    Very beneficial

  • @AboeHudayfa
    @AboeHudayfa 2 роки тому +5

    unfortunately the video is tempered with. The part where Dr Hatem mentions the isnaad of Muhammed ibn Abd al Wahhaab in Hanbali madhhab has been removed.

    • @JumpaKage
      @JumpaKage 4 місяці тому

      Why do you think😂

    • @DhikrDose
      @DhikrDose 4 місяці тому

      ​@@JumpaKagewhy

    • @JumpaKage
      @JumpaKage 4 місяці тому

      @@DhikrDose muhammed ibn abdul wahhab was the one who started the wahhabi movement with Mohammed bin Saud of the house of saud? They do started a Kingdom of Saud ruling with other what Allah ﷻ has re ealed, meaning Taghut. The one who rebelled against the Ottoman Khalif, the one who started the Khaariji movement?

    • @squidguard1
      @squidguard1 3 місяці тому

      @@JumpaKageWhy remove the part though? It’s fine to believe MIAW has no authority in the hanbali school, but to remove that clip is disingenuous.

    • @JumpaKage
      @JumpaKage 3 місяці тому

      @@squidguard1 MIAW’s statements & movements are not worth mentioning

  • @EagleHD
    @EagleHD 3 роки тому +10

    More of these please
    Can we do the Hanafi Madhab?

  • @mohammedmubeen5285
    @mohammedmubeen5285 3 роки тому +3

    Can you list out the books he mentioned please? It wasn't clear enough (considering I'm hearing these names for the first time)

  • @MohamedAli-nf8cp
    @MohamedAli-nf8cp 3 роки тому

    Awesome podcast Mashallah.

  • @sohail6759
    @sohail6759 3 роки тому +6

    So thus sheikh is athari right ?

  • @ansarihuzaif724
    @ansarihuzaif724 2 роки тому +1

    I just wanna ask which non muslims could be dhimmis Under Hanbalism? ( I mean except for Christian Jews and Parsis other can live also?)

  • @AbdullahodSandzak
    @AbdullahodSandzak 3 роки тому

    Wonderful stuff Dr. Shadee
    Do one on the Malikis. Your one too but get someone else haha 😁

  • @jawadkarim1116
    @jawadkarim1116 3 роки тому

    Marvelous

  • @farhan00
    @farhan00 3 роки тому +1

    Just moved, decorating
    Gonna get something from Irada Arts, in sha Allah...
    btw, Hanafi maddhab For the Win. Going through Noor al-Idha at the moment...

  • @rubenferrigni3802
    @rubenferrigni3802 3 роки тому

    Where can i find a text where i can learn the fardul ain of the hanbali madhab in english?

    • @SafinaSociety
      @SafinaSociety  3 роки тому +1

      It's called The Mainstay Concerining Jurisprudence. Available online.

    • @rubenferrigni3802
      @rubenferrigni3802 3 роки тому

      I already have 'umda and mukhyasar al khiraki but I think i shouldn't act upon it because they don't report the today's actual jum'ur of the madhab.
      I'm looking for something more recent but pure, not affected by the salafis.
      Jazakumullahu khairan

    • @MohamedAli-nf8cp
      @MohamedAli-nf8cp 3 роки тому +2

      @@rubenferrigni3802 Bidayat al-Abid, Umdat al-Talib (both translated by John Starling), Dalil al-Talib, and Zad al-Mustaqni.

    • @ashah4034
      @ashah4034 3 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/rbuwsNo47LE/v-deo.html

  • @akayzzsayz7219
    @akayzzsayz7219 3 місяці тому +1

    First and foremost the same way ashahira and mufawadia hijacked the mathaahib from its original founders they are trying to do this with the Hanbali madhab.
    They wish to quotes Hanbalis Who came hundreds of years after imam Ahmad but they will never dare to open up the books of Creed from his immediate students like he’s two sons Saleh and Abdullah and Al barbahaaie and Abu Dawsood and mirwazee.
    Do you want to know the creed of the hannabila go to its founders , nice try.

    • @Mek7699
      @Mek7699 3 місяці тому +1

      Harb al Kirmani has a great aqeedah book. He was one of the main students of imam Ahmad

    • @akayzzsayz7219
      @akayzzsayz7219 3 місяці тому +1

      @@Mek7699 yes and his book has nothing but the Aqeedah of the Salaf.

    • @ibrahimmohammedibrahim9273
      @ibrahimmohammedibrahim9273 3 місяці тому

      ​@@akayzzsayz7219fun fact
      I don't know if you know this or not early Malikis and shafis were atheris
      Imam Abu hanifah or at least he is students are mutazilis
      It doesn't matter tbh in my opinion

    • @akayzzsayz7219
      @akayzzsayz7219 3 місяці тому

      @@ibrahimmohammedibrahim9273 that’s my whole point the Malikiya and shafiess we are all upon the same Creed of their founders who despised and warned against philosophy as for the later scholars who attributed themselves to the schools of thought they were affected by these teachings

  • @omarrthaHanafi
    @omarrthaHanafi 3 роки тому

    Why did Imam Ahmad use the name of his younger son for his Kunya

    • @SafinaSociety
      @SafinaSociety  3 роки тому +3

      Good Q.

    • @Bulayla1426
      @Bulayla1426 3 роки тому +1

      People had kunya's when they were young. One sahabi was a little boy when the prophet gave it to him

    • @muaazseedat7989
      @muaazseedat7989 2 роки тому

      Because he was special to him.

  • @goidogoi
    @goidogoi 3 роки тому +2

    I don't think Ash'ariyya has any problem with Asthaariyya. We have a problem with the Hashwiyya/Salaafiyya claiming to be Hanbaliyya/Asthariyya and maybe with two particular among the Hanabila, ie Al-Barbahaariy and Ibn Taymiyya, bot with valid reasons.
    That's it. I rarely see any other Hanabila names pop up in a bad light among the Ash'ari scholars all over the world, except a few Hashwiyya who shared the same laqab with other famous scholars like the other Ad-Dariymiy (ie not the one who compiled Sunaan Ad-Dariymiy) who attributed jihaa to ALLAAH.

    • @ahmads5889
      @ahmads5889 3 роки тому +4

      بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
      السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته
      The Shaykh has the same aqeedah as the Salafis. Are you going to now cry a river? Lying upon the salafis

    • @goidogoi
      @goidogoi 3 роки тому +1

      @@ahmads5889 LOL. Real Asthaariyya don't attribute jihaa or form to ALLAAH. They simply won't talk about it. Complete Tafwiyd. Hashwiyya on the other hand.... are a bunch of fools who thinks they are Asthaariyya.

    • @amirulbimo3921
      @amirulbimo3921 3 роки тому

      @@goidogoi so barbahari is a hashawiya according to you ?

    • @goidogoi
      @goidogoi 3 роки тому

      @@amirulbimo3921 Ask Imaam At-Tabaariy RHM who was killed by his boys.

    • @n.a3642
      @n.a3642 2 роки тому

      @@goidogoi U sure about Imam Barbahari ? ua-cam.com/video/wdjK9ZS3axw/v-deo.html