Jazakum Allahu khayrun for this wonderful discussion. It's a blessing to see ulema who differ on some important issues to respectfully disagree while calling us to the bigger issues.
@@haisem9281 mashallah, even ibn taimiyah did sharh al umdah, and had more knowledge of the hanbali madhab, my statement still stands, and no one is shaming or insulting sheikh hating, I have immense respect and love for the sheikh
@@haisem9281 true hanbalis (who refuted the wahabis and their leader) do not view Muhammad abdul wahab as Sunni let alone hanbali, Muhammad abdul wahab says that which is contained in matn al iqnaa’ and al muntahaa is false and against the way of Ahmad, even the prophetic Text “ ما في الاقناع و المنتهى مخالف لمذهب احمد فضلا عن نص رسول الله"
@@lordrisen3696 If you mean he doesn't adhere to all the Aqaid views of the later Hanbalis I agree, but the same can be said of later Hanbalis not adhering to all the views of the early Hanabilah(and wider Athari Scholarship). ua-cam.com/video/jkVQ463VvTE/v-deo.html
Jazakum Allahu khayrun for this wonderful discussion. It's a blessing to see ulema who differ on some important issues to respectfully disagree while calling us to the bigger issues.
khayran not khayrun bro
SubhanAllah. This is was eye-opening for me. Jazakumullahu khairan
Good discussion. Would've liked to see "wahdat al-wujud" be dissected here but perhaps another time. Barakallahu feekuma.
Dr Hatim is trying hard to be smooth.
I don’t believe this guy is 100% hanbali, he is a neo hanbali salafist, and Abdul Qader did do bayah
@@haisem9281 mashallah, even ibn taimiyah did sharh al umdah, and had more knowledge of the hanbali madhab, my statement still stands, and no one is shaming or insulting sheikh hating, I have immense respect and love for the sheikh
@@haisem9281 true hanbalis (who refuted the wahabis and their leader) do not view Muhammad abdul wahab as Sunni let alone hanbali, Muhammad abdul wahab says that which is contained in matn al iqnaa’ and al muntahaa is false and against the way of Ahmad, even the prophetic Text “ ما في الاقناع و المنتهى مخالف لمذهب احمد فضلا عن نص رسول الله"
He is qualified in the Madhab, and adheres to it so how he is not "100%".
@@frankincensemerchant1284 what I said was clear, if you know the madhab you’ll know exact what I said, just read his book on theology
@@lordrisen3696 If you mean he doesn't adhere to all the Aqaid views of the later Hanbalis I agree, but the same can be said of later Hanbalis not adhering to all the views of the early Hanabilah(and wider Athari Scholarship).
ua-cam.com/video/jkVQ463VvTE/v-deo.html