Trapezoidal distributed load on Beam

[@girishgange]

No one can explain like you... Great person

[@civilengineering94]

Thank you so much 😀

[@luismarramirezcolmenares9404]

Thank you so much I have watched so many videos but I always get confuse but I finally got it, Great video.

[@civilengineering94]

Glad it helped!

[@melexia9971]

Thank you sir this taught me well ❤

[@corbalord]

YOU SAVED ME THANK YOU YOU ARE AMAZING

[@civilengineering94]

Thank you dear :))

[@umaizali333]

Best teacher

[@civilengineering94]

Thanks

[@general7]

thanks for enplaning. great job

[@civilengineering94]

Thank you

[@ajitha8922]

Thank you soo much Sir!

[@civilengineering94]

Most welcome!

[@haksophea4257]

I love your explaination

[@civilengineering94]

Thanks

[@kyledetring1175]

thank you so very much

[@civilengineering94]

You are very welcome

[@larrycantrelljr5570]

Thank you so much for a complete and thorough explanation. Great teacher!

[@civilengineering94]

You're very welcome!

[@User-j9r1z]

Thankful ❤

[@natanimkore]

thank you sir

[@civilengineering94]

Most welcome

[@panap3628]

bless u

[@civilengineering94]

Thank you

[@Kel-Sang]

Sir iska SFD and BMD kaha he ?

[@elizabeth3521]

What is Fi and Xi?

[@gaurav_mishra3183]

Thanks sir

[@civilengineering94]

Welcome

[@hubofonlineskills1778]

Sir request you to make a video on how to make shear and bending moment diagram of beam using force method and integration method please

[@civilengineering94]

As soon as possible

[@ZaxShorts1]

His rb is wrong. Correct Rb is 125.88 so 6+36x3.33 = that shit

[@db2885]

I would like to take my liberty to state that the solution for the support reactions does not cancel out the loading, hence the condition for equilibrium is not satisfied. Why don't we break down the loading into rectangular and triangular section and then solve them separately just to avoid redundant calculations and also, equilibrium condition would be satisfied.

[@civilengineering94]

its also possible