Did Caucasians Rule All the Great Ancient Civilizations? | Robert Sepehr Examined
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 жов 2024
- Were Indo-Europeans once masters of the ancient world? In this video, Dr. Miano looks into claims made by Robert Sepehr, who claims that all great civilizations shared the same ruling nobility, who were ethnically distinct from the populations that they governed.
After viewing, come back to the notes here for further information.
►DOWNLOAD Professor Miano's free e-booklet: "Why Ancient History Matters":
mailchi.mp/a40...
►SUBSCRIBE to the World of Antiquity UA-cam Channel for great travel videos about ancient ruins and ancient history museums.
► SUPPORT THIS CHANNEL
Supporters get access to behind-the-scenes videos, early-release videos, course discounts and more! / worldofantiquity
FTC Disclaimer Notice: Some of the links here may be affiliate links, meaning that if you click on them and purchase something on another website, I get a small commission. It doesn't cost you any extra, but I thought you should know! It does help support the channel.
► REFERENCES
Philistine DNA Study:
www.science.or...
On the Domestication of the Horse:
• Origins of the Domesti...
On the Tarim Mummies:
www.forbes.com...
www.penn.museu...
bmcgenomdata.b...
www.nature.com...
Peqi'in Cave DNA Study:
www.nature.com...
On the blue-eye gene:
www.ncbi.nlm.n...
On the term "Caucasian":
science.howstu...
courses.lumenl...
On scientific racism (aka "race realism"):
www.theguardia...
Professor Miano's handy guide for learning, "How to Know Stuff," is available here:
www.amazon.com...
Follow Professor Miano on social media:
►FACEBOOK: / drdavidmiano
►TWITTER: / drdavidmiano
►INSTAGRAM: / drmiano
I can’t believe how many actual Nazis slimed their way into this comment section 🤮
Define Nazi (without the [t]). Christ was a nazirene. As in nazireth.
@@jclayton-wv2fw take your pills bud
Go slander someone else before you catch a federal case. Title 28 U.S.C. 1441-1447
Just throwing this out there. The Bible doesn't say Noah's Ark landed on Mt. Ararat. It says Noah's Ark landed in the "mountains of Ararat." Ararat, or "Urartu," was an iron age kingdom in the Armenian Highlands. The mountain commonly called "Mount Ararat" didn't get the name until the medieval period and has several other, older names still used in local languages.
Good point.
Just canceled my order for a metal detector.
@@chickenduckhappy hahahah
There was no Noah's Ark.
@@LyleFrancisDelp Don, look up the Ron Wyatt discoveries. There is something there, that is a boat made of wood, the beam structure being revealed in scans, with some sort of primitive rivet use. There is a slide down a mountain, which had a village at the top, which seems to be made from the top wood from the boat. In the region seems to be large under hanging stabilising weight stones (called anchor stone). Even though there are many, and one used as a grave stone for a woman with her husband and family depicted, and a large ark on a wave, with a grave with 9 foot skeleton (since extracted). With a house said to be Noah's house, which got demolished by locals after finding out. But, are they? Proper research is not something biased researchers like doing. So, we have this much research so far, which is far more than any biased person who did. So, the question remains.
He's a white supremacist.. before I figured that out I found several of his videos cool and also started to follow him on facebook. He posted a pic of African people sitting at a beach with the comment "this is not in Afrika, this is in France". And people replied with comments like "they're replacing us" and "the white race will prevail". Don't remember which videos but also noticed this "ideology" in some other videos although he does it in subtle ways.
Yes, he is a WS. All of his work is biased.
Yes, I had the same experience with him. Def a white supremacist.
Well, I’m european and I loathe the american multiracial utopia our eu political leaders are forcing upon the nation states. Alot has changed here in the past 30 years and many europeans everyday ask themselves. Do I still live in my country?
@@Sperminski
Insecure white guys. Trump's base.
Marry a nice white lady and have kids.
Abandon that blow up doll!
@@kmaher1424 "have more white babies"??? I wonder, do you tell the Native Americans, or the Australian Aboriginals or other native non-white groups to 'have more babies'? Or, is it only the 'white' groups you laugh at, whist they become minorities in their own ethnic homeland?
Not gonna lie, this video made me subscribe to Roberts channel… thanks for hooking me up lol
Say you believe what you wish to be true without saying you believe what you wish to be true.
@@WorldofAntiquity nice redditor rage, he didn't say he was subscribing to Sepehr because he agreed with his conclusions.
I’m subbing too
Based
Does trolling make you feel good? Hope you find reason soon.
Sad attempt my woke friend. Feeble
In some people’s minds, facts = woke. 😂
@@WorldofAntiquity goes both ways though
One of Sepher's grandfathers was in the SS. And one whole side of his family is from Iran. So he's definitely got an interest in the whole Aryan thing
Explains alot!
Oh yeah that’s right he did a whole video about getting his DNA sent off to one of those genealogy companies.
Wow
What was Germany fighting? And why do you hate the people of Iran? Because it`s trendy to hate certain races now?
@@logicmontano3160 So it`s bad to be from Iran or be white, is it? Or to have German ancestry? You people are evil psychos.
Sepehr's claims his grandad was "a high-ranking SS Nazi".
He was a high ranking ShitsStaffel officer...
I don't like to damn the children for the sins of their (grand)fathers, but Sepehr comes way too close to embracing it.
@@mrjones2721 seeds always spread not fare away from from the tree
Good
Based.
I was debating this one guy who said the ancient Egyptians were white. He falsely told me there were no black Egyptians. I just laughed at him and moved on. Haha 😂
Genetic test of King Tut says that his DNA most closely mirrors Western Europeans. The study is available online.
He is of the same line as Amenhotep III, Akhenaton, etc. Ramses had genetically red hair, and there are numerous depictions of blue eyed Egyptians.
If you Google “Egyptian Mummy Portraits” you will see paintings of the later Egyptian nobility, they look like Southern Europeans.
There were blacks in Egypt but there were whites too.
@@romulusaugustus5894 Haplogroup R1B is also found in Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East. But none of the Pharaohs you mentioned were native to Europe they were all native to North Africa and the Middle East. Therefore those Pharaohs were not White. Their combination of Blonde, Red, or Brown hair with light skin does not mean they were White as in European. There were plenty of people with those phenotypes in the North Africa and the Levant.
The only Blacks who were in Egypt were the Nubians who were not indigenous to Egypt they only migrated there. The only White people who were in Egypt were those who migrated there from Europe during the Ptolemaic era mostly. However, the indigenous Egyptians did have skin tones varying from light to dark. And they were indigenous North African and Levantine people.
@@keith.anthony.infinity.h Everything you just said is pointless, 99% of all R1b is found in western Europe, white Americans & white Australians. Middle east's and subsaharan Africa's R1b is negligible and ultimately comes from Europe, so what's even your point? Yes, pharoes had European ancestry.
Ancient Egyptians were black, white and brown, evidenced by art and mortal remains.
Robert has an obsession with blond hair and blue eyes, so much so that he selectively chooses what evidence he uses to reinforce his biases. Quite frustrating to be honest.
Seriously! I hate when people who claim to be, or act like scientists ov any kind, and look at something with a conclusion already decided first.
And his fans seem to have such little understanding outside ov their own little ancient aliens/pseudoscience circle that they try to argue with people that actually care about factual reality and do not like that the truth does not point to "white people-Atlantis-ancient high tech" rubbish.
It is sad because it just helps push the truth back while glorifying the false narrative. Usually so they can sell books and make money on the silly circuit they all hang around.
If only it were left to the fringe it would not bother me so bad.
But I had high hopes for the internet spreading Real knowledge.
Not making young people eat up ridiculous lies (such as Caucasian's ruling all ov the Old World during ancient times =white supremacy)
A grandfather of his was in the SS and the other side of his family is 100% Persian (Iranian) so it's pretty clear why he has an Aryan obsession
My 23and me has recently updated and confirmed my mitochondrial ancestry is shared with the mummy of Yu Hong from china
It also confirms that this mitochondrial dna originated from the ukraine/North Caucasus
However my ethnicity report is 90% irish and Scotish
Very cool! I’d love to get mine tested some day, it doesn’t seem to be too expensive any more. Human biodiversity is honestly incredible!
7th I paid 80 dollars
But don't rely on one
Upload raw data to other places
About 20 dollars each
Gives more details
Not really that surprising since it’s probably a tocharian mummy which were genetically Indo European. Look up tocharian mummies online
I feel like this dude is just not-picking at Robert’s take on this subject. I don’t feel like he doing much of disproving his claims.
robert sepehr: a bad attempt to pretend nazism isn't nazisim
Ok so I am Peruvian. How do these people claim Inkas or Mayans or Aztec civilization existed if civilization on itself is a caucasian or white export?
Viracocha was an Aryan...
....and so was Quetzalcoatl....
I had to break this to you, but neither of those characters are real.
@@WorldofAntiquity It's interesting to see how in that video a lot of the things mentioned that were supposedly introduced by aryans and allowed for empires to exist in the first place never existed in Mesoamerica and yet civilization and even empires managed to exist. Incas never had chariots, or horses, or writing (at least that we know about or can decipher), or horses, or even the wheel. We know, for instance, that the wheel was probably known to these peoples, but it simply was not practical or useful for an Empire that developed in the Andean highlands where either the geography or the lack of strong pack beasts made wheels as a means of transport useless. Means of registering information in a very much different way existed, khipus, not resorting to what most people would consider "writing". I guess a lot could be questioned by people who believe the whole Aryan supremacy if they looked outside Eurasia and Africa.
@@WorldofAntiquity
Oh, so native peoples are making stuff up too...
I see, everyone is lying, except Dr. Schoolboy......
..lol....racists like you are so predictable..
@@akwida "making stuff up too"
Of course they do. Or do you actually believe that all the gods a fantastic creatures of all the different cultures in history are real?
"I rented some sort of bike near the lake, which happen to get me thinking about ancient chariots"
-Robert Sepher
@Aaron Merrill that shit got me! Almost spit out my drink 🤣🤣🤣
I like different ideas but this guys nutty! He even promotes eugenics in his other videos
@@satanwasframed5083Cringe take from someone with an even cringier name. Well done.
@@JannyBesmircher play chicken with a bus
@@JannyBesmircher so your name is melanin farmer and you want to defend eugenics? I stand by my previous statement but with one modification. Let the bus win
@@JannyBesmircher at least he's not a "solar loser" that see himself as part of somekind of "superior race"
go mumble about Hyperborea or another delirium
I know this isn't exactly on topic but my ancestors come from Ararat and I might be able to add something here.
I don't know if many Armenians today literally believe society re-started in Armenia with Noah on Mt. Ararat, but the old timers definitely believed in the story literally. Armenia and Proto-Armenian goes back around 3000 years and while never a superpower, Armenia has played a key important role in the history of the ever evolving region and eventually spread more influence all over the world in general. I honestly haven't heard Armenians who identify specifically as "Caucasian" or "Aryan" culturally, we are our own thing. We look like everyone mixed with everyone because society was at the crossroads of so many trade routes connecting east to west and north to south. I do think we have an interesting history but all anyone seems to know about is that awful event from 110 years ago, although this isn't really anyones fault. The fact that certain nations didn't acknowledge the event definitely kept the wounds open. I grew up with some of the last survivors of the event and its still a very touchy subject.
Sorry
@@Vaughan2323 It's not Russian propaganda, it's Armenian propaganda. Totally different nations. I've never heard an Armenian claim this made their culture or people any better than any other cultures, it's just one of those ancient genealogical things from back when you needed to say you're descendant from a biblical character or a god or a hero or someone like that.
Calling a mention of the Armenian genocide Russian propaganda is asinine. Btw., about looking like everyone mixed with everyone, just look a Switzerland and western Austria at the crossroads north of Italy with trade going in all directions 🙂 Not on the same geographic scale, of course, but Europe by itself is also kinda big-ish and diverse 🙂
@@chickenduckhappy Really goes to show that there is really only one race, the human race.
Well, two if you count Italian people.
@@chickencharlie1992 hahaha
What is Sephers general point? I have been enthralled with his videos for over a year. I listen with guarded ears as to not bias myself. That said I feel his works are saying 3 things.
1. The Aryans were from Atlantis
2. The Aryans/Nazis escaped WW2 and went to the south pole and have been ruling us secretly
3. Academia is changing history to hide all these truths. (That part has merit, just look at Berkeley lol)
Sepehr is pretty much on point. These channels just call him names. Whereas Robert, presents evidence.
Sounds like you don't even watch the videos that expose his lies.
Is it just me who thinks many of his racial "theories" so closely resemble the racial propaganda that NSDAP used in the 1930s? Like how Roman emperors were fair skinned Aryans with blue eyes? Or the ridiculous idea that the Aryans originated from Atlantis?
Well when you keep getting different research and investigations always leading back to the same conclusion, then at some point you have to ask yourself... is this a fact/truth? Especially when these researchers are among the top highest IQ professionals. The Germans were absolutely brilliant as much as no one wants to admit. They were far ahead of all the Allies and Soviets combined and everyone knew it. Thats why the Soviets and the Allies immediately engaged in a race to secure the German scientists, engineers, technicians, etc. and bring them back to work in developing all our most advanced technology. See Operation Paperclip.
@@colonelclump2000Nazi Detected opinion rejected.
Yes, it's the same copy pasta pseudo science.
I think you don’t want to look in the mirror and accept that perhaps Germany had more to offer back then, and now we are living in a society where men use the women’s room because “they feel like it’s right”.
You don't have to believe truth it's still the truth
Maybe you'll do another video on the Afrocentric nonsense too..?
😂 You can't debunk reality, David has his PhD in Ancient History and he doesn't promote nonsense
@@ConanTheCimmerian I never said that but go on 😂
@@xp8969 I don’t think you understood what the “Afrocentric nonsense” he is referring to is…
Hoo boy, I can’t wait to read the civil and informed discussions that must be going on in the comments.
I absolutely adore the particular group going around defending Sepehr’s video by calling everyone else leftist propagandists. As if everyone is invested in American politics or even American 🙄
edit: misspelled name
@@luckyblockyoshi many people promote leftist propaganda unwittingly, by outsourcing their thinking and engaging in group think. Mass formation psychosis.
"the aim of ideological subversion or active measures is to render members of the target population completely unable to come to rational conclusions"
Sephr is peddling the Oera Linda book, and literal nazi ideology so, you know a leftist is left of that I guess.
Anyway his books make a wonderful gift and I hope everyone here has a wonderful day.
this video is not very well done, like the first 3 arguments you make against his case are pointless. he says the horse was brought into africa, you "correct" him by saying it had 2 origins quite possibly by indo-european speaking peoples. you do realize you just confirmed what he said right? and the rest of your arguments are based on changed definitions of words? communist much? lol
Not all my comments are arguments.
@@WorldofAntiquity at 5:09 seconds you misrepresent his work. Robert has stated multiple times and provided reasoning for his position that the noah story was misrepresented on the specific point of noah and his family being the sole remainder of mankind after the flood, he specifically mocked the idea we are all the result of mass incest.
*edit i should have said the 30 seconds or so preceding 5:09
@@WorldofAntiquity well then i should pry go through the whole video then and point out every single instance......i was just gonna leave it at that and let the public figure it out but i can singlehandedly prove you are either incompetent and dont know what your talking about or your just some looser trying to leech off a more sucessful channel. personally i think your either a communist, a fed, or some form of wu-mao like paid internet troll.
@@chrissweeten6096 My point is that he picks and chooses which parts of the story he wants to believe and which parts he doesn't, apparently based on his personal preferences.
Ahahaha exactly love these woke loosers
Let's put this in plain terms: Self proclaimed anthropologist Robert Sepehr propagates a rather explicit Nazi hypothesis. (To be fair, some of the nationalist and racist precursors of the Nazis in the late 19th century had made claims to the same end, which directly fed into Nazi racial theory.) Among other things, it was one of the goals of the SS sponsored German Tibet expedition to prove that the Tibetan ruling class was of Aryan descent, and they made the same claims about Japan's ruling class. There were also theories that the Massai in Africa were really Aryans. Etc. etc.
The evidence those people produced was about as flimsy as Sepehr's.
Just one correction: Outside of groups with Indoeuropean heritage (which includes the neighbors of such nations, like Hungarians), blonde hair and blue eyes are extremely rare. Like really very rare. Now, mind, Indoeuropean does not equal white but comprises a much larger group of peoples, including btw. the Romani, who speak an Indoeuropean language. With this group, the fairly common occurence of blonde children often had tragic consequences in Europe. This gave birth to the legends that Roma stole kids from "white families".
What's funniest regarding the Tarim mummies is that the Tarim basin wasn't a part of China until the Han dynasty, and even then it wasn't always under Chinese control. In fact, Chinese iconography and literature often references the "barbaric" people from this area as having red hair, a trait apparently seen as exotic in ancient China.
Regarding mr. Sepher's idea, while there were non-Han imperial dynasties in ancient China, the earliest one probably being the Northern Wei, I'm not aware of any that was specifically Indo-european.
Those are the tocharians
@@cariopuppetmaster Wrong the Tarim Basin mummies were not Tocharians, the Tocharians were a later people that migrated to the Tarim Basin. The Tarim Basin mummies belong to the Ancient North Eurasians and are an older group that arrived in the Tarim Basin, being one of the first peoples in the region, they are essentially indigenous. Yes, they were Caucasians, but they were not Indo-European
@@Skypad00 ancient north urasians are distinct from Caucasian, but ANE were one of the precursor for Caucasian, but still not the same
@@Skypad00ANE didn't have red hair, so how did tarim mummies have red hair, even native Americans don't.
I knew it! We wuz kangz!!!
Ahhh the white version of “we r kangz”
Brown PPL mad
White ppl deluded
I'm mostly Scottish, English and Danish and never refer to myself as Caucasian. My ancestors were not from the Caucasus Mountain region. At least not for thousands of years.
That whole classification system was thought up by racist phrenologists. They thought people from the Caucasus were the best looking and best examples of the "white race"
Edit: also it annoys me how "Asian" has come to mean "east asian"
These things just encourage stupidity. Africa has become known as "the place where blacks come from" and Asia is the place where "Chinese looking people are"
Instead of the huge, diverse continents that they each are.
And also, no joke, I've heard newscasters refer to black people from England as "African Americans". People just use these term with zero thought just because "that's what they are supposed to say"
As a chechen fully agree
Yea.
I've always noticed that alot of these " debunkers" don't mention the Eugenics and royal family's involvement with everything being discussed
..from bloodlines.
To the FAVORED RACES,mentioned in Darwins title
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 well-said!
@@jasoncarey157 “races” refers to species, and “favored” refers to an organism’s ability to survive its environment. It has nothing whatsoever to do with racism or eugenics, even if people later misused his book for their own agendas. You are perpetuating a common misconception amongst fundamentalist Christians who don’t believe in evolution, have never read “On the Origin of Species,” and use those incorrect definitions to attempt to discredit Darwin.
Race Traitor
Blond Hair and Blue eyes seem to be a non Indo European origin likely from Old European people. The Yamnaya themselves were brown eyed and dark haired. It then bugs me, what is it with the scythians who spoke Iranian laguage? I am surprised Speher failed to mention the mittani people (residual Indo Aryan speakers).
He has... many times..
You are incorrect. Yamnaya had blue eyes. That is where the gene comes from.
@@eodyn7 No, No it ISN'T.
@@eodyn7no? Blue eyes came from western or northern Europe
Yamnaya have nothing to do with that
@@dv9239 blue eyes came from Asia, Period
Sepehr is a well accomplished Anthropologist whos written several books. His work is more credible; its more scholarly and he is more qualified than the narrator of this video (who comes across as emotionally charged and subjective). Furthermore, this narrator uses modern popculture and mainstream vernacular which indicates heavy leftward political leaning and clearly missed some major points in Sepehr's video, or maybe he just misunderstood all together. Not sure if this was intentional or not, but his modern ideology about history indicates a political agenda. "Modernity is a tribe of pygmies furiously trying to bury the Giants that came before them so as not to feel inadequate" J Alden Fleming
Sepehr's only accomplishment is duping a bunch of people into thinking he knows what he is talking about.
"Modernity is a tribe of pygmies furiously trying to bury the Giants that came before them so as not to feel inadequate" J Alden Fleming
"Sepeher is a well accomplished anthropologist" 😅😊😂😊😅😂😂😊
Debunking white supremacists on UA-cam. That will be a lot of work. Like, A LOT. Sadly. Good luck with that.
The proliferation of such nonsense is alarming as well as depressing. But not really surprising, I'm afraid... And I'm not American, so I'm amazed that people there still use "caucasian" and so on as to define their race. I'm actually amazed that they have to answer such questions...
Thanks as always.
Robert Sepehr is quite literally a Nazi, his ban from Twitter was literally for posting pro-Hitler tweets 🤮
@@xp8969 I guess his obsession for white skin, blonde hair, blue eyes, races, aryans, swastikas and very, very bad history were good hints. ^^
Why are you KNOCKING someone else's Theories. You are trying to say he s Not an Anthropologist by he uses an old term? Do you FEEL more Superior now? What is Your POINT? Except you got some personal dislike. Why don t you just Share your Theories based on your INFORMATION? Why should I LISTEN to you? I DON'T want to Now. I don't like people that knock others to Lift themselves. Stand up for your own theories on the MERIT of your own Accomplishments. I feel sad for You. You sound jealous.
>Why should I LISTEN to you?
Then don't. Go away.
Rebecca, this is a debunking series. I have other types of videos too. Check them out.
All you do is straw man and obfuscate. You incorrectly state his claims and then try to debunk some skewed version of an argument he made. Good job trying to piggy back off another man’s work. You are trying to knit pick stuff rather than debunk his main point of why he makes videos. God forbid someone tries to study their Indo-aryan roots. We are only allowed to learn how we stole everything from the superior black man.
Holy shit!!! Lol. Just looked at your picture and saw your name was David. Ahahahahahahah. No wonder ur labeling people white supremacist for trying to talk about their history. It’s literally like clockwork how you people work.
@@goabparty9574 giga based
You are not the same people that lived all those years ago. This is such a pathetic excuse to feel superior lmao. Like people celebrating their "Yamnaya roots", man, absolute cringe.
Wow. Comments demonstrate the some people passionately want to feel superior because of their supposed ancient ancestors. Labrador Retreivers come in black, brown and yellow. They're all dogs, and all Labradors whatever their color. If you want to be proud, be proud of YOUR OWN character and accomplishments.
"If you want to be proud, be proud of YOUR OWN character and accomplishments."
Problem is, Sepher's fans have none, and they're acutely aware of it. So they'll latch onto him as the nearest fascist who tells them they're special because of their ancestors.
Lyndon Johnson said it best. _"If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you."_
There's a lot of this misunderstanding and conflating talks of linguistic origins with genetic/biological origins. Languages are fluid, and linguistic change a lot of times happens due to elite domination, not population replacement. Correlation of linguistic data with gene pool has to be proven first with other means before they can be assumed. 8000 Normans (who were themselves originally Norse) completely changed English into what it is today through introducing thousands of French words, calques and structures.
The best example to this is us, Hungarians. We speak a Finno-Ugric language despite the fact that we have very little genetic connection to Finnish or Estonian people. And we just recently found evidence of connection to some other people who speak a language from this family.
Yeah but the Norman's and Anglo saxons are both in the undo European language family.
@@HomoErectusIsAFunnyName Yes an agglutinative language
Basque are a good example of this - high concentration of Indo-european R1b haplotype but non-indo european language.
Mr. Sepher connected the dots on many levels. Including DNA.
NOT JUST LINGUISTICS
I'd love to know why its imperative to deny the biological reality of race - which is observable. Who and what does such denials benefit?
Who is denying that race exists? Sure, it’s a social construct just as much as animal taxonomy, but it exists. Perhaps a more interesting question is who and what does insistence on racial categories benefit?
@@WorldofAntiquity You singled out Caucasian as an "obsolete" term, (as opposed to Ne/gro/id and Mon/go/lo/id) when in reality it is not and remains very much in use today. You're trying to imply that Caucasians are only white and or European, when in fact this term defines peoples from North Africa, Levant, Middle East, India... and Europe, so yes, Hyksos, Canaanites, Israelites, Semites, all Levantines fall under this umbrella term as do ancient Egyptians and North Africans. Not all Caucasians are white, but all whites are Caucasian. Additionally, Caucasian is not a race, it is a designation for one of the major classifications and divisions of mankind. What is the purpose for such denial?
@@Egyptologist777 caucasians are not blonde. Blonde people are from north of europe. Americans confuse terms. They do not understand geography.
You must be typical main stream 💯
Noah was white whiter than anything anyone had seen Everyone burst from him and his family Caucasian
I think Robert Sepehr knows very well what he is doing. He has realized that all the way throughout history for the great majority of people mythology has been far more important than cold facts, which Dr. Miano also must have noticed when comparing the number of subscriptions to his own sober channel to the numbers of subscribers to channels of the Von Däniken / Hancock variety. So Robert Sepehr for his own reasons, decided to become a creator of myths. Other people who have trodden this path with some success are Madame Blavatsky and Carlos Castaneda to name only a few. In fact most if not all of the people who have won fame as saints, spiritual leaders, founders of cults and religions, philosophers, political leaders and inspirators have created their own myths and have invented their own versions of the sciences. Exactly the same goes for the modern cults which have taken control of western governments and "international institutions" world wide, cults that shall not be named, because the certainty that my current post would be censored by the platform would rise from 80 to a 100%. If you can read this post, then wish me luck, for my virtual drawers are full of posts which have been deemed haram by the powers that be.
Based comment
@@heliand_22 Thanks! On the occasion of your comment I reread it, and yeah, I'm pretty satisfied with this one! -;) Incredible it is still visible. I get perfectly innocent comments deleted all the time.
Yeah this is pretty much how it is
Have we considered that the earliest chariots were Sumerian, drawn by donkeys, as seen on the Royal Standard of Ur? They might have then diffused north to the mountains, where they had "the ass of the mountains" as they called horses.
I wish you all the luck with moderating this comment section. I'm sure it will be a doozy.
Yes. Someone actually threatened a man who was defending Me Sepehr. Said he was putting the guy on a list.
I can't even do it. I was going to try to listen to you speak about this anthropologist I'm a big fan of, but your nitpicking so badly at three minutes and I'm already rolling my eyes… What's it called when someone makes a kind of strawman argument… Well, I guess that's what it is a strawman argument.
I'm out of here. It seems like everybody that has a problem with Robert Sepher comes from a place of motion, and the evidence I have is that they can never really put a conclusive argument together that doesn't sound like overly Karen persnickety whimpering.
I love the fact your debunking a man that's riding a tricycle around a park.
WHat did he debunk? Look outside these CONTROLLED channels!
@@prophetnozza4150 He debunked every falsehood the man on the trike said. Did you watch this video or did you just jump to the comments to debase honest historical research because in your head "they" are controling the narrative?
@@somniumisdreaming He didnt debink anything, do you always believe what people say and DONT CHECK IT OUT YOURSELF..... the state of you gombines
@@prophetnozza4150 So you would rather believe some random guy on UA-cam then an actual professional archeological
@@wellobush9022 Who said i take in for gospel one dudes word on UA-cam..... I said what did he debunk!!! Notice you havent answered it beacuse you are a good little boy who questions nothing! Try looking outside of CONTROLLED academia.... dont you people realise yet YOU ARE BEING LIED TOO!
Just try! JUST TRY LOOKING OUTISDE YOUR MASTERS....... anyway, what did he debunk LOL WAITING!
If you take two twins and put one in a palace and on in the fields when they get old the one that was in the sun from sun up to sun down will be darker than the one in the palace.
Exactly, tanning is a thing too.
does yer man, ah Im not sure how to word this. I can't take that fella seriously riding around on a large tricycle with a flag... Not that Im paying much attention cos his voice bothers me too, lazy voice on a tricycle.
Hahaha. Riding a tricycle having deep thoughts. His voice matches his content as well. What isn't funny is his 750k subs and $3600/ month Patreon account.
Damn $3.6k a month, I need to copy his style!
First of all, it's not uncommon to find remains with reddish or blondish hair. It's a part of the decomposition process as the melanin brakes down. Secondly, most Europeans are not blue eyed. Thirdly, very, very few Central Asians have light colored eyes. Lastly, blue eyes are a genetically recessive trait.
Does the hair color break down to red uniformly. In other words are dark haired mummies concurrent in time? Also, if there is a breakdown over time is it linear with intermediate stages in color?
@@mefobills279 I'll see if I can find an article explaining it. I think it's down to the fact that some people have a certain type of melanin than others which gives brown vs black undertones. If you have hair with the brownish undertones as versus black it bleaches with decay. Don't know about intermediate stages, but I'd suspect it would have to get a bit auburn first before getting to that reddish brown or red. You can see the same thing in Incan mummies too. Most remains are never well preserved and the hair decays completely. But globally, there's a lot of people who actually have very dark brown rather than black hair. Sometimes you can see it better if you're looking at it through strong sunlight.
@@TRUTHTEACHER2007 We need some way to tell the real blonde and red head mummies. Figurines from the period depict people with blue eyes were present in ancient Egypt and elsewhere in the world. I guess it will be up to DNA to tell the story.
You are wrong. They're proven that melanin does not break down from decomposition. Remains with red or blonde hair had red or blonde hair when they were living
@@robertmurphy3608 Thanks. It seems all of the brown people of the world are butt hurting about how Aryan explorers and settlers conquered them so easily. Then they have racial hatred toward their own ancestors, because the Aryans bred into their populations.
I would love you to break down why Caucasians didn't start farming cultures we see today
Haters gonna hate
Did I miss something, why was the dude riding the bicycle thingy while claiming historical racial superiority?
It was a chariot
Please listen to all of what a person has to say before you insinuate they are a atle minded racist.. just a thought. Most of what you pointed out as his out dated science and outdated thinking is just modern social restrictions, and not true science. His argument in not that indo Europeans rueled the world but that the ruling powers of the ancient world received their knowledge and technology and culture in part from an older forgotten civilization or civilizations. I also don't think he thinks these people are modern "whites" but just my opinion on that.
When you are talking about how science, which is progressive by definition (since our knowledge and understanding increases with time), was better in the past, you are not being scientific.
@@WorldofAntiquity Not sure if you are just a "Straw Man" or a "Gas Lighter" arrogant and patronizing person. You surely do not help yourself with your comments. You know exactly what this person means. You are just being the "I'm a Historian" that uses Google and am 100% fact checked jerk.... The days of behaving like this are soon to be over.... Better get a REAL job...
@@WorldofAntiquity you truly are a moron, did you just say we progressively increased scientifically?! Really?! Explain megalithic stonework and geometry of pyramids
@@WorldofAntiquity Why are you assuming all is ‘progressive’? Obviously civilizations rise and fall and progress is lost i.e. The Dark Ages. You have been taught how to think not to think. Indoctrination. Race realism is reality. That’s why blacks are so athletic and Jews are so smart. Racially driven GENETICS. Only a Marxist would deny it.
@@MrBooYa-yd5er *Why are you assuming all is ‘progressive’? Obviously civilizations rise and fall and progress is lost i.e. The Dark Ages.*
I said science is progressive, not all is progressive. Modern science began after the Dark Ages.
*Race realism is reality.*
Stating something to be true doesn't make it true. Back up your beliefs with evidence. Otherwise they are just beliefs.
Not sure if you'd be interested in it, but would you make a video on why caucasian has fallen out of favor with anthropologists. What the original view was, how it changed, and what theory did they replace it with?
I probably won't make a video on it, but you can read up on it here: courses.lumenlearning.com/atd-pima-ant112/chapter/chapter-5-race-and-ethnicity/
That would completely anger his radical leftist base who funds his channel so dont see that ever happening. He chose that title specifically fully knowing it a dishonest representation of Sepher's work. As Shepher addresses that politically motivated criticism at neaseum in countless videos. Which a large portion of videos are a study into why we are not allowed to discuss the arayan people desipte overwhelming body of evidence showing a near global influence. This channel is pandering to the radical leftists who actually believe there are Nazis and white supremacists everywhere. In the bushes, under the bed, in the closet. It would be hilarious if not such an accurate representation of the mass delusion of these people.
@@MT-ub8qg 💯
@Wayne Smith I am pretty sure most people don't think about the people that live in the Caucasus.
@@WorldofAntiquity well that was a brilliant rebuttal to my critique. You knew full well what you were doing by posting that video with that title. Im sure it got you clicks. I would appeal to your integrity but that would appear to be a zero sum game.
I have learned a lot from rhe comments of this video.
Mostly what I learned is that Gretir was correct, "Boldly do men speak from a distance."
For the Sepehr fans, that distance seems to be from "evidence."
I love Robert's channel, very informative and enjoyable. I don't understand what you intended to accomplish in this video... you basically agree with everything he says.
You weren't paying attention.
I love your channel also!
@@WorldofAntiquity no, you're just not as smart as you think, sport. Why don't you challenge Robert to a debate?...
@y3Ll0w_$yNdIc@L!$T lol truth is not bigoted guy...
@y3Ll0w_$yNdIc@L!$T since you claim to be a scholar, why don't you share your published works kid?... You and this video have debunked nothing. World of Antiquity's sources are a bunch of MSM news articles. 🤣😭😂 That's not debunking anything, kid. But it's funny how arrogant you are. Please, continue. 👍
"Esoteric nonsense" How do you know its nonsense? Because it doesn't align with your religious beliefs?
Because it doesn't align with reality.
@@WorldofAntiquity It doesn't align with your understanding of reality. I don't understand how people think they have it all figured out when in reality we really don't know squat. I'm not saying it's truth but I am open to the possibility. And to be honest some of it makes more sense then what's taught in a church. The same numbers and symbology is repeated through history and religions. Religions like catholicism have twisted the original teaching and meanings. Forcing them underground, which is where alchemy comes from. The esoteric nonsense was practiced by most of the old masters like Da Vinci.
No it's nonsense because its nonsense.
The thing about the Sons of Noah having all of the ethnic groups in them probably comes from young earth creationism.
What the hell is a young Earth creationist sounds like you're trying to take new ideas and thought processes and blame them on the youth😅
@@skynote1728 ::
_Young Earth Creationists_ is not a reference to _Young People,_ it's a reference to people who believe that the Earth is only 300,000.00 yrs. Old.
@@cliffgaither they think its less than 7k years old
@@AsianTheDomination :: OK ! I keep hearing different figures, but yours seems the most probable.
@@cliffgaither supposedly you can add up the geneologies from the creation of adam and it gives you a timeline of the old testament. ive never done this before but ken ham is one of the most well known and hes compiled one on his website.
Dude you make no sense
Sepehr withholds all comments until he deems them worthy of his genius. That's why you'll see no contrary opinions or challenges to his authority. All that's left are embarrassingly enthusiastic comments from his acolytes. He'll occasionally allow a questioning of his brilliance just to give a short, sarcastic response.
I've left numerous comments asking where and when he graduated and the title of his thesis only to have them deleted. He's a narcissist in the true sense.
Interesting!
@sassy pethel Because you're narcissistic supply and he thrives on it.
@sassy pethel Yes, because you praised him. You're a source of narcissistic supply. Try asking him where and when he graduated and the title of his thesis. I'd be grateful if you'd return here and tell me his reply. And show me a comment on his videos that challenges him. You won't find one.
Harry Wolf ■ Not only does he delete questioning comments of his research, he has prevented certain people from even having future access to a particular video. I can not only NOT find my critical comment ... I can NO LONGER find the video !
@@cliffgaither That's interesting. It seems Sepehr has created a cult and it's quite sad as when I first found his videos I enjoyed his different take on history, albeit with a grain of salt. Then I realised his fascination with a certain 1930s political movement (ahem!) and everything fell into place.
Funnily enough, the commenter I replied to in this thread has deleted their messages.
The ability of people to lie to themselves and others to defend their guru’s is as fascinating as it is sad.
Fans of this guy actually claiming he isn’t using race as a grift? So similar to the lost high techies who cry that “he never said that. You’re strawmanning”
That he uses training wheels on his bike is a very apt.
New Earth is very similar. She doesn’t allow comments on her videos but directs any criticisms to an external site. Which she scrubbed and set up another one.
Just as with lost high tech it’s best to view these as a cult. Compare the way the followers behave to standard operating procedure of any cult.
To defend their L Ron they’ll blatantly lie, usually with the “I don’t agree with everything he says but you are misrepresenting him” line thrown in somewhere.
Often enough you can find that person in the comments of said channel congratulating them unreservedly.
Yet when their guru is critiqued they suddenly become very demanding of specifics.
Ancient history has become the new religion for so many people. Their ability to lie and defend liars is extraordinary.
Stefan Milo privated a recent upload because so many supporters of LAHT were screaming he was strawmanning.
I know you see this in your own comment threads on LAHT.
This atlantean gardens fella is a white supremacist per excellence. It’s as obvious as Tariq Nasheed is a black supremist.
People with inferiority complexes and a chip on their shoulder having to go back thousands of years to find self esteem.
Lost Anxient High Techer - “Loincloth wearing primatives” would require levels of technological assistance along the lines of lasers and 3D milling machines to make artifacts that precise.
Skeptic: Rome made artifacts that were even more extraordinary. What technology would they have required?
Lost Ancient High Techer: Iron tools!
@@josephjackson2010 yes. Iron has magical properties of transferring precision to anyone who uses them. Try using a wooden mallet and you’ll miss by six feet but as everyone knows an iron hammer is accurate to within 2 nanometers. You don’t even have to look, just swing it and the magic of iron just makes it so.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded I usually try to get to them by saying...
The Egyptians are the true Atlanteans!
Ancient Egyptians, had (knowledge, discovered, created) Medicine, Maths, Government, Sailing, Geography, travelled to and traded with Latin America and Asia, a very advanced civilisation to say the least.
@@SacredGeometryDecoded love your channel mate. Glad to watch an intelligent person debunking BS fantasies.
@卐 خانه آریایی ها 卍 I’m a leftist?
I’ve been called a lot of things but never a leftist.
Sepehr seems to like to lean on very specific, disparate studies to try and substantiate conclusions far outside a reasonable stretch of the imagination, and sadly most people that watch his videos wouldnt bother means testing his research-pool to realize most the body of his ‘evidence‘ is really weak, or lazily tied together
😂
Could you give an example?
@@JamesTaylor117 I had been following Sepehr since the start of the pandemic, when I had been introduced to his channel and found his views interesting and thought they might have some weight to them, I had even bought his book 'Species with Amnesia' which discussed the possibility of an advanced civilization pre-younger dryas, I would like to pull specific examples from that book but I had lent it to a friend (who I'm not friends with anymore) and unfortunately cannot find a free pdf to recall specific points made, but one thing I do remember finding odd even at the time of reading it (at least a year ago now) that his citations were very vague. Usually, in a serious study that uses cited works, the author will discuss at length his sources, comparing and contrasting them with others, fully analyzing the material, etc., in a footnote at the bottom of a page or at the end of the work. However, with Sepehr, he would number every source he used and whenever a claim was made, would merely put a [1], [1,4,7] etc., without at all discussing the source material he'd supposedly base his findings on. Thus, reading the book back then (and keep in mind I was open to the idea of a lost advanced civilization at the time), I felt that he did not put as much work into means-testing his claims (i.e., pulling from authors with opposing opinions and comparing/contrasting their views). Usually, serious academics will properly cite the sources of their evidence, so rather than just having the name of whatever article/book he was using, he should have also cited what pages he was directly pulling from, that way it would be easy to compare the source material itself with how he uses that source material to cement his arguments. Instead, he only cites numbers and does not take the time to evaluate how different articles/papers compliment or contradict each other. Vaguely, I recall him discussing 'megalithic' works, 'caucasian/aryan' groups such as the Berbers, the universality of swastikas, fair-haired mummies (side note: the embalmment process bleaches hair) etc, but it felt as if he was merely pointing out to different things and would not tie them up in a neat, coherent way that felt he proved his main thesis. It rather seemed like a compilation of his sources rather than an exhaustive analysis of them. Again, if I had the book on hand, I would give more details, but unfortunately do not and can only base it off memory at this moment. Read his book for yourself though and maybe you'll see what I mean. PS: 'Species with Amnesia' was the only book of his I read, though I had watched a good bit of his videos on youtube. Perhaps he did not make the same mistake with 1666 or the Vril Society, but Species with Amnesia was published after those, so I would not be surprised if they were constructed in the same manner.
@@effortlesskyle7013 So I find his videos extremely interesting and I often use them as a stepping stone to bounce off and look up other information. But like all internet personalities I take everything with a grain of salt. It's very difficult to really know what's true or not. I don't necessarily trust the standard accepted version of history but nor do I trust every conspiracy idea that comes along. The truth is probably somewhere in the middle most likely. Now I will admit though I was very disappointed with his book 1666: Redemption Through Sin. 15 bucks on Amazon for a 74 page little thing that covered the quick basics of the story of Sabbatai Zevi and Jacob Frank. Like practically a pamphlet. lol. Overall he does a good job of describing it and many other Illuminati related details but I was actually pretty annoyed by how short it was. I was expecting more from the "The World's Most Dangerous Anthropologist". It's the only one of his books I read but I have to agree with you about his referencing techniques. His books are set up much like his videos where there's a ton of information that all sort of ties together but isn't explored too far in depth depending on the subject matter and can be all over the place, often in the same chapter. He sprinkled some pretty bold claims throughout it though so I started to look up some of his citations. To his credit a lot of them are direct passages from the sources and he does list the source typically in the preceding texts leading up to it's inclusion. But like you pointed out the references themselves just list the book or article and don't include any specific page numbers or context about the original author or the source itself which is kind of obnoxious. Not saying he has to go all in on every single reference (that would make for a pretty tedious read and I'm probably not scholarly enough for all that honestly) but at least a little bit here and there would definitely help to show that he's done his research regarding where he's getting his information and help to show that he's presenting unbiased data. One of the ones that stood out the most to me was at one point about midway through when he's tying Sabbatean Frankish sex cults to "Socratic communism" as he puts it which he also ties to Aleister Crowley within the same few sentences, which ok, Crowley was a well known deviant. But what stood out to me was the next sentence where he just casually throws it out there and I quote: "These sex cults were very similar to the Socratic ideal, which held all things in common, including their wives and children, especially for sexual purposes. This is the real reason why the Athenians convicted Socrates of corrupting the youth, and forced him to drink "hemlock (poison).(37)" That's a pretty bold claim but he's already moving on to something else in the next sentence. No follow up whatsoever. ??? lol. So the reference is to a book called "Why Socrates Died: Dispelling the Myth". I found the book online but I haven't ever read it so I'm not really able to report anything about it's contents. But I guess my point is that's a very controversial statement and one I've apparently seen a lot of debate online about as well as Socrates in general. It basically paints him in a very negative light. He is both revered and villified depending on the source but mostly I'm just pointing it out as an example of his writing style which can be very frustrating. I do appreciate his presentations and if nothing else his videos have sent me in lots of interesting directions but I try to maintain a healthy skepticism as well.
Gutsick Gibbon does a thorough takedown of Robert Sepehr's pseudoscientific bullshit:
ua-cam.com/video/lJPoiFj6P2k/v-deo.html
It is allowed to think and say that the cradle of mankind lies in Africa but it is not allowed to state that Caucasian ruled huge places on the earth? That’s strange.
Then you want me to believe that because the grandfather of S war in the SS and part of his ancestors are Persian he’s not trustworthy? We truly must be living in very dark times now.
What did your grandfather do in the great wars? And what is your heritage?
Great descendent from the ones that slaughters the Indians? And grandfather threw the phosphorus bombs on cities in Germany that were crowded with refugees? So your super trustworthy.
I have watched several of Sepher's videos and I have been overcome by his ego. I don't really care if he is a scientist, he loves himself and that is off-putting.
His comment section is filled with non stop worship it’s like cult
At least he doesn’t hate himself and his race.
Compound bows are a modern bow using eccentric pulleys to give you compounding draw weight. He should have said composite bows. They would have been laminated with various woods and bone to increase strength and flexibility where best used. He really isn't a professional is he?
I believe the proper term for the ancient weapon is composite recurve bow
@@swankfiber5278 no
You are wrong ua-cam.com/video/Lgyy4hVnOKY/v-deo.html
It's a common term, just like longsword or claymore. Not accurate but common outside most people except extreme specialists, and pissy pedants
@@Rynewulf it’s almost like this video and the one it was made to reply to is intended to be specialist. Also, getting compound bow vs composite bow correct really is not at *extremely* specialist. It is at most moderate hobbyist level knowledge.
The oldest swastika was found in Ukraine on a mammoth tusk from about 12k years ago. So doesn't really matter how long the Indians had been using it because they got it from indo europeans.
In mehrgarh site oldest swasthika of vedic period is found and that is 4000BCE old Means before the Aryan migration because Europian historian says that Swasthika bought by Aryan migration but it was already there, and swastika is mentioned in many ancient civilization And swastika & arya is word of vedic Sanskrit which originated in ancient India because rigveda didn't mentioned Europe or Central Asia for once, Rigveda mention bharat kuru panchal sarswati and Himalaya Hindu sages as aryavart. yavan(yamanas) Is Called anarya ( non-aryan) In Rigveda
"વિષ્ણોર્ સ્વસ્તિકમસ્ય પદમિચ્છંતિ માનવાઃ |
તં સ્વસ્તિકમસ્ય અસ્ય પદમભિ સંતિ દેવાઃ ||"
"Viṣṇor svastikamasya padamicchanti mānavāḥ |
Tam svastikamasya asya padamabhi santidevāḥ ||"
"Men seek the swastika from Vishnu's foot,
Which the gods themselves reverence, as the symbol of his might."
So Swasthika is originated from Vishnu's feet according to rigveda which is symbol symbol of supreme male energy & peace prosperity.
A large chunk of indians come under indo European stock.. north indians...they didnt get it from " indo europeans ". They are indo european.
Nice try, you got most your facts wrong,
Caucasian means People of the Caucasus mountains and that's the contexts Sepehr is using (He literally said it), not Caucasian race
He never claimed Hyksos were Indo-European Speakers, you put words in his mouth. (He also says it afterwards )
Most of everything else you claimed were also Jokingly wrong (not saying everything Sepehr claimed was flawless either)
Maybe if you watched more than 5 minutes before writing a knee-jerk reaction, you would realize that when he speaks of the the one tribe of people from the Caucuses, he is referring to the original inventors of the chariot back in history before they migrated. Later he says: "While the term Aryan is confined to describing a linguistic group in modern times, it is also etched into stone millennia ago in places like Iran by Darius the Great, who refers to his race and lineage as Aryan, which is why I use the term." Notice his use of the word "race." You would also know that he speaks of blond-haired, blue-eyed people teaching civilization to people around the world. Wake up.
I’m not white yet I’m consider caucasian . I don’t think he mentioned color. But it’s funny how ancient peoples stories mention either a group or a single “white “ individual who came along and changed everything.
He is very careful to avoid talking about skin color directly, preferring to center attention on blue eyes and blonde hair, but when he talks about an ethnic caste system used in India, he is referring to it. His "Aryan race" is defined by its lighter skin color.
@@WorldofAntiquity well in the America’s at least in the southern region it was the same story and these stories came directly from the indigenous people. Example Quetzalcoatl Kukulcán .
@@westcoastmex629 Same story as what?
@@WorldofAntiquity I gave you two examples . Hey it’s ok to be white and proud . I’m not white but I do admire how the western civilization which was lead by “white skin” people thrived . I’m Mestizo and my kind didn’t even exist till recently so no I will not take any credit or claim anything from those who came before me.
@@WorldofAntiquity I'm Juwish and understand that Caucasians are Ju's without the recognition. I wish other Ju's would stop using caucasians as punching bags 👊
I would like to see Sephrs rebuttal video to this one
Or a legitimate debate
@卐 Veni Vidi Vandali 卍 He does give off an impotent rage kind of vibe doesn't he?
@@KingZealotTactics he wont debate, i asked him for live debate and he gave me a timeout on the comment section.
@@NEO36999 maybe he’s too busy with his own projects
@@MrBooYa-yd5er
No he would get called out (rightfully) as a bad faith debater and enforcing supremacy
Thanks for directing me to Robert. His videos contain strong truths and DNA evidence of many of his claims. Cheers
😂
You have to be really ignorant on basic history, science and anthropology to actually have respect for RS' videos. I mean, he can't even get the basics right.
It's cute how you're pretending you weren't already a long-time fanboy of him.
Bot account.
@@mahzarXthese guys are neo nazis
This is a waste. You never once disapproved his archeological finds.
You just childishly slandered.
The term "Caucasian" is often used to describe people of European or Western Asian descent. However, the term actually originated from the Caucasus region, a mountainous area located between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea. The people who live in this region are known as Caucasians, and they are known for their distinct physical features such as light skin, high cheekbones, and straight hair. Robert is spot on!
The people who lived in that area had nothing to do with most civilizations.
"There really is no such thing as Caucasians in a racial sense anyway" I'm curious as to what race the videos author categorizes the peoples of northern Europe as?
@@richardlooney1 We use haplogroups now. More scientific.
@World of Antiquity I appreciate the reply and I would ask which haplogroups are most common to northern Europeans. Do you use haplogroups when referring to other "races" or just Caucasians ?
@@richardlooney1 I don't refer to races at all. No need.
3:30 he brings them up because he uses the term caucasian in the old christian sense, where there were three caucasian groups: semites, hamites (egyptians), and japhites (indo-aryans). without the context of his other videos it’s easy to miss the connection
he also contends it’s only the new church saying all the races came from noah, whereas before it was different caucasians. the term better describes skull structure as there are east african caucasians with darker skin but different skull and facial structures than sub saharan people
😂 Lol this is why people still believe in the white Egyptian thing. If I was European and I followed nothing but this guy I would probably believe that too.
The oldest Swastika found so far is from 18,000 BC in Ukraine, north of the Caucasus Mountains. Robert Sepehr is correct.
Thank you
@@Robert-xx8jx and pyramids TOP SECRET
But this will disprove aryan migration theory, because oldest swasthika is founded in mehrgarh 4400BCE-4000BCE In South Asia before the Aryan came and Vedic Sanskrit originated in south Asia not central asia or Europe and swasthika & arya both are Sanskrit word, why rigveda didn't mentioned Europe or central asia or sintashta for once? Why they only mentioned south Asia like bharat Himalaya saraswati Sindhu Sarayu ganga yamuna and Indra Agni bramha Vishnu Rudra Surya like gods and Sages like vasishta bhardwaj atri etc
That was not even a swastika
With much respect, this seems somewhat strawmanish.
This Sepehr character is a crank, but he is touching on a few truths that haven't received the attention that they deserve.
The quantum advances in DNA science since 2014 have answered many mysteries of history.....
..... and it seems as though European emperial age theories on these issues usually hit closer to the truth than subsequent theories from anthropologists and more leftward leaning academics.
For instance: Black Egypt origin theories can no longer be reconciled to these new scientific discoveries.
The Ancient Egyptians descended primarily from early neolithic farmers who originated in Anatolia. These were the same people who displaced hunter gatherers in Europe before later being mostly displaced themselves by Indo-Europeans. Now that we know this for sure, it makes lots of sense.
The Hyksos were certainly a genetically closely related group of horse warriors during a millenia when horse warriors stomped everyone to varying degrees.
You claim that "White" and "Caucasian" are no longer thought valid scientific terms.
OK, but uhhhh.. .
What name might we give to the ancestors of modern people with caucasoid hair, long noses, etc? This is in fact a distinct population group. Anthropologists used to accurately identify the population group of a skeleton or skull. One of those categories was "caucasoid." I suspect these words haven't been replaced with more accurate identifiers.
I smell an Orwellian weirdness here. A very simple idea is being made to seem impossibly complex.
So it turns out that the Ancient Egyptians were more closely related to modern Sardinians than to any other modern population group.
They were of the
"thin haired, long nosed people"???
*The quantum advances in DNA science since 2014 have answered many mysteries of history*
Did I not refer to DNA evidence in this video?
*and it seems as though European emperial age theories on these issues usually hit closer to the truth than subsequent theories from anthropologists and more leftward leaning academics*
No, they are further from the truth. Science advances. It doesn't go backwards.
*For instance: Black Egypt origin theories can no longer be reconciled to these new scientific discoveries*
Science doesn't support either a black origin or a white origin theory for Egypt.
*The Ancient Egyptians descended primarily from early neolithic farmers who originated in Anatolia.*
The DNA evidence indicates otherwise.
*The Hyksos were certainly a genetically closely related group of horse warriors during a millenia when horse warriors stomped everyone to varying degrees.*
Closely-related to whom?
*Anthropologists used to accurately identify the population group of a skeleton or skull. One of those categories was "caucasoid." I suspect these words haven't been replaced with more accurate identifiers.*
Yes, they have.
@@WorldofAntiquity
You say
**"No, they are further from the truth. Science advances. It does not go backwards."**
That is in fact, not true. It's also strangely empty and obscure. You don't seem normally inclined towards platitudes.
Newer theories aren't necessarily superior, nor more science based.
For instance:
The British language enthusiasts in India who first hypothesized a common mother tongue, accurately determined the time period and origin point. Many did anyway. That's remarkable! They were able to determine these things using little more than the metrics of language, knowledge of how it evolves etc. That deserves a Hollywood movie.
**"Science doesn't support either a black origin or a white origin theory for Egypt"**
This bru-ha-ha has inspired me to hypothesize how political opinions form (to include history, religion etc.)
There are the facts, as best understood by whomever is opining, and then....
...this "Overton Window" thing. Who but white supremacists would ever even suggest that the ancient Egyptians fit squarely into the caucasian category? As it turns out, they do. Disregarding the term "caucasian" doesn't change that, nor does acknowledging this make someone a white supremacist.
**"The DNA evidence indicates otherwise"**
It does not. The Abusir el-Meleq mummies and DNA studied from Pharoah mummies indicate primary decent from "Levantine farmers" but that's who those farmers were. DNA has also recently told us that farming was spread more through displacement than the adaptation of farming technology by others. These Levantine farmers descended primarily from the aforementioned Anatolian farmers.... probably history's first full time farmers.... they spread into the Levant, and then later into Egypt. That IS most certainly what the DNA says. And these were people with caucasoid hair, high instances of blondism etc.
Makes perfect sense. Many mummies have clearly red or blonde hair.
Your last paragraph:
What are the new identifiers for those wacky and obscure long-nosed-thin-hair folks?
@@LVSJT *Newer theories aren't necessarily superior, nor more science based.*
That is not what I meant when I said science advances. I'm sure you must be aware that every new hypothesis gets tested in science until it is fully assessed. Our understanding always gets better over time. And the imperial theories you mention have been scrutinized and shown to be wrong.
*Who but white supremacists would ever even suggest that the ancient Egyptians fit squarely into the caucasian category? As it turns out, they do.*
That makes sense, since supremacists (of any stripe) want to claim great things as their own.
*Disregarding the term "caucasian" doesn't change that, nor does acknowledging this make someone a white supremacist.*
Sepehr does more than simply acknowledge this.
*The Abusir el-Meleq mummies and DNA studied from Pharoah mummies indicate primary decent from "Levantine farmers" but that's who those farmers were.*
I said in the video myself that Levantines moved into Egypt over the centuries. But you said that "the Ancient Egyptians descended primarily from early neolithic farmers who originated in Anatolia." Egyptian DNA is not "primarily" Levantine, nor is Anatolia in the Levant.
*DNA has also recently told us that farming was spread more through displacement than the adaptation of farming technology by others. These Levantine farmers descended primarily from the aforementioned Anatolian farmers.... probably history's first full time farmers.... they spread into the Levant, and then later into Egypt. That IS most certainly what the DNA says. And these were people with caucasoid hair, high instances of blondism etc.*
No historical claim will be accepted without presentation of the evidence. Please provide the scientific evidence to support these assertions. It certainly isn't in the Abusir el-Meleq study. Don't make far-reaching claims from samples taken from 3 mummies, especially when other DNA studies have been done.
*What are the new identifiers for those wacky and obscure long-nosed-thin-hair folks?*
Which wacky and obscure long-nosed thin-hair folks?
Dude its called cancel culture.
Theories are not facts. It’s either truth, factual or false, lies. No theory. There is no middle
The linking of language and "race" is fraught, as there is evidence to show that when a population has been taken over by new rulers, the small percentage of the ruling caste makes little or no genetic impact on the overall population, but the language and customs of this "upper class" has strong influences on the native population, so much so that the newcomer's language often replaces the indigenous one over the generations.
Exactly how Spanish and Hispanics will be the norm in USA soon.
Maybe but then we would have to throw almost all anthropological theories out the window since language is probably what is looked at the most for evidence of ancient peoples.
@Mikołaj Dujka I said soon. God your name is so 3rd World and crazy.
@@MrBooYa-yd5er Actually, that's how hispanics of America were born
If you go further back in history, there will be a time when ethnicity and language correlated 100% with one another. That's actually how languages were born, by groups of people who were geographically and subsequently genetically isolated from one another.
Actually he is right about the Anatolia region being a cradle of civilization but the Noah's story makes it obvious that the people on board the Ark were hundreds of years old and lived elsewhere before the flood 🙄 😂
I want to see a white supremacist and hindu supremacist to argue about who the Aryans were and what they looked like 😂
I’m so glad I wasn’t drinking anything when I read this 😂.
The lighter your skin color the higher your place in the caste system so there's not much difference
@The Dark Knight no clue what you're rambling on about but the facts don't care about your feelings and the facts are the darker the skin the lower the caste in Hunduism, it's been that way for centuries
@@xp8969 you're talking about the corrupted caste system which was created by the British. The original caste system never mentioned fair skin as high caste or dark skin as lower caste.
@卐 خانه آریایی ها 卍 here comes the Iranian supremacist
Whew, this comment section. I can appreciate the effort you put in, but there's really no point in talking with Nazis.
Yeah it's like stormfront invaded the comments.🤦🏾♂️
Gutsick Gibbon (who is an actual anthropologist) has a video (ua-cam.com/video/lJPoiFj6P2k/v-deo.html) debunking Sepehr's claim of being an anthropologist extraordinaire. The reality is, that he has no recognizable skill in that area.
@@gratifyingmyself9474 So true!
She’s great, I’ll have to watch it.
Great listening to you after R sepehr how cool you can rip his crap apart yes he's a total racist.
Lol love seeing Robert making so many of you people seethe. Debate Robert on this subject
Tell him he's welcome to make a response video.
@@WorldofAntiquity I'm not his keeper dude comment on his video or reach out to him through some other means. I love all these leftists calling for his censorship in the comments real communist tier garbage
@@WorldofAntiquity
LOL!
He doesn't need to.
You're chasing after him, "hipster"....
Robert Sepehr is correct and as far as semetic coming from shemetic being seed of Shem is absolutely correct and if anything's wrong is the linguistic usage that is incorrect
@FIGHTFANNERD10 LOL unconscious incompetent... You don't even know... That you don't know.... Lol first off let me call you on the 20 different straw man arguments you just created. Whatever you and all the rest of slanted backwards thinking libtards invent and create .... Please create proper terms to go with them. You are borrowing from something you don't even understand and you are twisting it. I guess that's why a boy can be a girl and a girl can be a boy. Language is important and should be respected and preserved . Shemetic is not a linguistic term ! No matter how long you have used it as such it's root and meaning has been around much much longer. Make up a different word . Shemetic is a LINAGE . Men ,,,, that are of direct paternal linage from Shem . Not Ham, or Japheth. Milk comes from the mammary glands of a mammal. Not from a almond or a coconut.... Smh lol .
@FIGHTFANNERD10 Robert Sepehr would not argue with you. Most of his videos show exactly what you speak of. Maybe become familiar with his work before making an opinion based on ignorance of his work. Just saying....
What next, they'll tell me that Habasha(Ethiopians) are descended from Kush(Nubians)?
Apparently Sepehr lost a lot of supporters when it turned out that he's the son of Jewish film director Ben-Hur Sepehr, who was born in Iran and left after the revolution.
Because that's the kind of people Sepehr's ideas appeal to.
And? He's clearly still doing alright. So clearly his ideals also appeal to people outside of that demographic you refer to. What dishonesty you show, lol.
Reminder that animal conservation and vegetarianism also appealed to AH and that the big mustache man drank water. Surely that must mean these things are inherently bad, right?
@@denofpigs2575 Whatever
@@TankUni 👍
@@denofpigs2575Sounds like you both have this backwards. Let's judge him and his supporters by their ideas, not the ideas by his supporters. And his ideas are trash.
@@michaeljames4509 So you've analyzed his ideas and claims fairly? Really. So please explain to me where his ideas fall short. I'd love too see how you came to that conclusion. Surely you must have some rational basis for this opinion and surely didn't come to this conclusion without investigation.
So I'm 10 minutes in, and already Sepher alludes to scientific evidence for a global flood, the selective breeding of Noah's ark, Shem as the progenitor of "God's Chosen", and the giants of the Bible. I sense a strong subtext here.
World of antiquity you just lost a subscriber you should know better plus you just trying to belittle the next man we call that clout chasing.. come up with some real information on videos you ran out of material so you went to one of the best athropologist that you can find and try to debunk some of his videos you want to debate against him cuz you have nothing good to present yourself.shame on you shame on you.
Bye, Felicia.
@@eightfootmanchild you're the example of poverty..
An anthropologist who hasn't kept up with his own field is not good at his job.
@@WorldofAntiquity I just think the white supremacists in the thumbnail was inappropriate.Robert isn't a white supremacists, sad to see a educated man like yourself not to get the full meanings out of his work.. by the way I'm biracial
@@donwoo6293 Well, the definition of white is a bit fluid, some people including South Asians, West Asians, and North Africans, as Sepehr appears to. When he speaks of Caucasians/Aryans with blonde hair, blue eyes, and lighter skin, who do you think he is referring to?
Bikes have two wheels. He is riding a tricycle.
He must be shocked if we told him that Arabs and Jews are the descendant of the Hyksos and they are not white, he can easily study the language of the hyksos to know that they are not white, almost all of the hyksos kings names are very semitic and you can even find many words and names from the hyksos from modern day Arabs and Jews. xD
4:45 you now twice revered to that some words aren’t used anymore and because of that it must be wrong 😑. Couldn’t it be the other way round? It’s something the “ now- rulers”/ present Hegemon tries to eliminate out of the his-story and to destroy books and forbid words and signs goes well with that.
I never said "because of that it must be wrong."
This comment is a bit late to the game, but I believe the bit about white-skinned Aryans creating the Indian caste system is drawn from early Victorian theories. "Scientific racism" was in vogue at the time, and with the start of the linguistic investigation into the Indo-European language family, there were a bunch of people who assumed that Indian civilization started as Aryans coming into India with their language and ruling over the dark-skinned natives, but who then "degenerated" by admixing with the local population. (Funny how the English and other Europeans didn't consider it degenerate to take lots of Indian women into their beds, though. Especially since part of these theories said Indians were incapable of ruling themselves because they were too sensual and sexual.)
The reality is that the caste system wasn't as strong before colonial rule as it was during and after. The British tried using it to organize colonial rule, and so enforced what they thought were strict standards drawn from Hinduism, not appreciating how decentralized and traditionally-bound Hinduism was. (They did the same thing with Muslims both in India and elsewhere, making sharia far more rigid than it used to be.) With only one version of the caste imposed on all of India, it became a much greater part of everyday life, and also became a rallying point for Indian nationalism and Indian cultural identity -- ironic, considering the pre-colonial version was so much less rigid.
It also wasn't the case that the brahmin caste were the rulers. Kings were often of a different caste. The brahmin caste was considered to be the most spiritually pure, and so they devoted themselves to religious and philosophical pursuits, and their primary involvement with leadership was as advisors, record keepers, and conductors of sacrifices and divinations. That gives them lots of power, to be certain, but far from the European concept of an elite aristocracy.
So Sepehr really seems to be mixed up in both his ancient timelines and his modern research. This stuff was debunked so long ago, scientists hadn't yet gotten past the theory that maybe the sun was a giant flaming pile of coal.
@I2byte, for a very easy overview of the topic, it's discussed in the Great Courses lecture series A History of British India, by Dr. Hayden J. Bellenoit. In basic, the British were looking for a way to rule Muslims more efficiently, and instituted a more rigid version of Sharia law than what the Muslims of the time used, looking to standardize it across all lands and using a very fundamental version rather than the local customs of individual areas. The same thing happened with the Indian caste system, which was never so rigid until the British used it as a legal shortcut.
Ancient caste system was strict, in certain areas it became lax, and the British Empire revitalized for personal gain.
Earliest accounts of Christian missionaries in the areas around Kerala addressed the difficulty of eliminating caste…
Amazingly, even today in both Muslim and Christian areas it is seen (there is a documentary on UA-cam about this).
Sharia by definition demands someone follow to the letter of the law, including punishment… saying the British repurposed it is defensible but as doctrine it is supposed to be interpreted verbatim.
21:01, you haven’t done enough research on ancient Uighur’s to “disprove” anything. You operate on the fallacy of disproving things that you such a poor understanding of.
Ad hominem moment.
Caucasian is still used in anthropology and genetics, the term that's used for europeans is europoid, I might make a response to this, but both the hyksos and indo euro are caucasian, Robert uses it correctly to refer the a broader people across eurasia.
If you and Robert want to speak your own private language, that’s up to you.
That is correct. White/Caucasian is a person of European, Middle Eastern, or North African descent. -NCBI.gov.
The word caucasian is still used by Americans but overall it is out dated
@@regardsjulio8227 they have almost stopped using that
White people did not originate in Caucasuses
I appreciate your thoughtful critique of R Sephyr theses. I believe Robert was in grad school in anthropology, and got kicked out , apparently for controversial ideas. He definitely harbors a resentment towards academic programs. So there’s that. But I have followed Robert, and though I have at times found him to be controversial, I’ve also found him to be convincing, backing things up with evidence. But I’ve never heard anybody Critique him. I thought you were fair; acknowledged when his assertions were correct, but also when they were incomplete or distorted. you did not go personal and you had legitimate points to raise. I see many of his defenders have come to the fore here. That’s fine but have an open mind; he is not a guru. I’ll continue to follow Robert, but I also go with some additional contextual information.
*I believe Robert was in grad school in anthropology, and got kicked out , apparently for controversial ideas.*
Do you know where Robert talks about this? I am interested to hear more about it.
I always wondered about his academic accomplishments, especially because he calls himself an anthropologist. I also find it strange he has the fascination with the Aryans, caucasians, Indo Europeans, etc. he also has quite a few videos on the third Reich. Because from what I know, Robert's family are Persian Jews. His father is actually a film maker.
LMAO the Sepehrites raided these comments...lmao be careful, they may use Vril on you!!.... I can't stand Sepehr, and not just because he is a Nazi Neckbeard. He is obviously not an anthropologist. If he did study anthropology somewhere, I hope it was a free course, or he should get his money back.
He literally has a degree from the University of California lmao. You're not very intelligent huh?
@@JannyBesmircher yes, I have heard that is the case, and all I have to say about that is that he deserves a refund. NOTHING he says is in line with what most archaeologists say, and he makes very "beginner" errors regarding time frames, species names, clades, etc.
I remember reading that the hair doesn't actually change color during mumification. I can find the study if you like
I remember dealing with dark brown human hair I used to reroot dolls that turned red in ten years. It doesn't even require exotic chemicals.
Some do - the bog bodies of Europe, for example. The tannins present in the peat dye it red, and there might be other chemical reactions that happened when bodies are preserved in different places. If you still have it around, I am interested in the research you mentioned if you can link it
Welp, 4 minutes in and so far he's proving Robert right. 🤭
Exactly.
in this video you mention some "plot to erase history" in reference to what sepehr alluded to with the buddha statues like thats some super crazy idea, but have you seen any netflix "documentary" recently? or just browsed tiktok or any social media platform full of black people claiming they were the true rulers of egypt or they are the ones who explored the world and everybody else copied them, that they invented every part of the modern world we love so much today, that mozart and beethovan were actually black, that viking rulers were black and on and on. there are a whole lot of people out there who are 100% replacing real people who existed, who we know for a fact were white, with black people. why would they be doing that? replacing the little mermaid or peter pan with a black person is stupid, but whatever, cartoons, not actual history. would you still claim today that it is some super crazy idea to think there might be people out there who are in fact trying to rewrite history to leave white people out of it? if there are this many people doing this now when pretty much everybody has access to the internet and thus nearly unlimited information (whether that info is accurate or not is a whole other question) at their fingertips to very easily see through blatant lies, whos to say this hasnt been happening on a large scale for thousands of years?
either way, just glad theres several channels that cover these fascinating topics from different perspectives!
He doesn’t respond to comments like this because he knows that they are definitely deleting white people from history on purpose, and he is part of it with videos like this.
And they only want to portray white people as colonizers and slavers, but in order for people to be able to be colonizers and slavers, they must’ve had the upper hand in a lot of other ways as well. How can you victimize people who are on par with you? You can’t have it both ways, even though they try.
6:57, He says that the Hyksos introduced the "compound bow" into Egypt. However, the compound bow was only invented in 1966. I think he meant to say that they introduced the COMPOSITE bow. Always love to see how the conspiratorial racists can't keep words and technologies straight.
The Blue eye argument is absolutely bonkers.
You don't need to be a Historian to answer this. The fact that certain dyes are an absolute luxury in the Classical world is enough to answer this with Honesty.
Let me explain as a layman:
These statues are made for Temples, for revering their Gods and Deities, to be put on public display and to honor the clergy and appease both the People's (and Clergy's) spiritual need and their Gods/Deities.
These includes Tombs, those who can afford the colossal cost of building one are considered Demi-Gods themselves... Like the Egyptians and their Pharaohs Sepehr kept mentioning.
Are you seriously saying that these should be made with cheap, easily erasable materials? No you won't. Brown is made out of Clay or Mud that contains small bits of rusts, called Umber. Brown are easily erasable and degrade... Unlike the colour Blue... Why?
If you google "blue" and read Wikipedia about shades of blue, you'll find a color called Ultramarine and if you read the Article about Ultramarine you'll find this sentence.
"It remained an *extremely expensive pigment* until a synthetic ultramarine was invented in 1826."
Continuing further you'll find that Ultramarine was made out of Lapis Lazuli, a mineral that is commonly found and mined by Ancient world Civilization around the region of Modern day Iran and Afghanistan... Reading about Lapis Lazuli you'll find
"Lapis lazuli artifacts, dated to 7570 BC, have been found at Bhirrana, which is the oldest site of Indus Valley Civilisation.Lapis was highly valued by the Indus Valley Civilisation (7570-1900 BC)"
These cultures who have access to Ultramarine/Lapis Lazuli will definitely use THE MOST expensive colouring they can get to depict THE MOST highest being in their society.
Why he doesn't say anything about this? There's two answer... One is that Sepehr is disingenuous about his claim that he omitted the part where the colour blue is THE MOST EXPENSIVE COLOUR in the ancient world, neck-connect to Purple. Second, he doesn't do any semblance of research of his claim
Also aren't most of the Buddha statues he had shown made in the medieval period, and are mainly from Tibet? From my knowledge, none of the ancient statues had color, or at least the color isn't preserved today.
@@thelordandsaviorgigachadrr888 I mean, I am not a Historian, I just know with common sense that if you gonna depict literally The Gods of your society, you gotta depict them as actual Gods... With high respect and the best offering you can give
As far as I understand it, some Egyptian statuette and tombs are indeed preserved because they're stored indoors
@sassy pethel Clearly doesn't read a single word I wrote.
No Reason? Besides being an expensive and permanent marker?
I Repeat again, in simple paragraph:
Brown is made out of a mix of dirt and iron oxide, it very easily chipped away and it's cheap
Ultramarine is expensive, and are more of a permanent dyeing agent than dirt and rust, last for a long time. The component to make it was made in Areas around Modern day Afghanistan and has spread all over the Ancient world through trade.
Are you telling me that these kings and queens would make their temples and Statues depicting their LITERAL GODS AND GODDESSES with CHEAP AND EASILY ERASABLE MATERIALS? Are you willing to believe that these rulers don't want their legacy to be made with grandeur?
I ask you this. You're a King/Queen, and you build a cathedral... You have access to Marble, and Wood... Which material would you use? Marble? Or Wood?
You have access to gold, silver, and Adobe bricks
Would you make the Cross and the Altar with Bricks, or with Silver and Gold?
Will you build your Cathedral out of Wood and the Altar out of Bricks while your rival, or nations neighboring you build it with Marble, Gold and Silver?
Answer that with honesty, and you'll realize my reasoning with common sense, no need to become a Historian to answer that...
@sassy pethel Painting? Why are we talking about Painting?
First of all
We are talking about statues, figures inside temples and such... Why are you talking about painting?
Second
There's no Painting made in the Ancient world. Frescoes and Reliefs yes, but no Paintings. All painting depicting the ancient and classical world were made in the Renaissance age. And those people didn't know what the Ancients looked like, they just looked at the same statues, plaques, fresco and relief the same as us and paint according to their artistic interpretation.
Third
My analogy still stand. If you see a Statue or Figure made out of gold, does that mean the person has gold skin???
If the sarcophagi of the Pharaohs have Purple from Tyrian Dye, does that mean they have Purple lines on their skin???
No, they just made, lined and coloured them with a valuable materials, because again, *THEY ARE DEPICTING GODS AND GODDESSES AND IS ESSENTIALLY THEIR IMAGE AND GIFT TO THEM*
Even Biblical Mythology recognize the importance of respecting your God's offering... Abel was more favourable to God because he offered a Fat, Healthy, and Milkable Goat to Him while Caine is less favoured because he offered God coarse, broken, and un-winnowed Rye.
Again, Answer my question with honesty: *Will you offer someone, Let alone your own God, a Gift made out of cheap and easily broken materials???* *Will you depict someone that you respect highly, Let alone your God, with cheap and erasable coloring???*
@sassy pethel Good, this is where Our discussion ends. Because you refuse to grasp common sense, there's no reason for you to talk and for me to answer.
Good day... Read something or engage with someone that's factual and logical instead of someone's Unsubstantiated White Supremacist Conspiracy about a single Blue eyed, White Skinned race that rule ever single civilization on the planet... and I wish you well.
I've seen the Xinjiang mummies. As you say it is Central Asia. Chinese armies of the Han period invaded and there's been a long history of Chinesd expansion and imperialism there. It is absolutely no surprise that the people there were not ethnically Chinese. Even today the majority of the population of Xinjiang is not ethnic Han Chinese.
I think this guy Sepehr is just pandering to a specific audience that isn't going to ask him for references. People often don't when someone presents something that plays to their beliefs.
Not watched him much, followed him on social media or read his books then, aye...
@@johnpalmer5357 no, following Sepehr is what makes it obvious what a grifter and scam artist he is 😂😂
@@xp8969 Err? So, because I've followed David here from when hardly anyone else was, does that make David a grifter and scam artist? Hmmmmmmmmm. hahahaha
Lmfao@@johnpalmer5357 learn how to read bro, I never even said Dave's name let alone anything about him 😂 I said Sepehr is a grifter because he is 💩🤡💩
@@xp8969
You forgot to like this comment. Communist
I have a hard time listening to this nasely beta fighting for the establishment.
Archeologist beef is finally happening on UA-cam 😂, I can’t wait till all of what was supposed to be fun educational content turns into clickbait react videos
Side note: I’ve never taken the idea of white supremacy away from his videos… I’m pretty sure he think white Nordic looking aliens came down and slept with the lower slave classes and that we are ALL the result of that
Which is wild… but life if boring and I don’t think anyone takes it as fact like no one thinks ancient aliens is science but the point is you can still learn a thing or two
For example one of my relatives is a professor of the history of Islam and I showed him a video on Robert discussing sethianism and while he didn’t dissect the video he confirmed a lot of what was said which at the very least you can chalk down to….
Huh that’s wild is that real? Oh it is? That’s crazy or Huh is that real? No but Interesting some people think that way
He's also put together videos explaining that the Athenians repelled the Atlanteans who had attacked them in an attempt to subjugate them. Does this sound like Robert is pretending "white supremacy"? Hell no. He talks about every bit of human history be it positive or negative.
Quite a lot of people take it as fact. Take a look at the comments under this video to find a few of them.
As for white supremacy, he may not openly advocate for it, but as sources for one of his articles he used three books by one of Hitler’s favorite eugenicists, one of the shapers of the Nazis’ racial views. The guy’s nickname was the “Race Pope.” He also used an article written by a guy who founded and headed a white supremacist “scientific journal.” Sepehr didn’t use these books and articles as references for historical attitudes toward race, he used them as sources of fact.
@@mrjones2721 Spoiler alert, some people are idiots but the good news is they are more likely to get drunk and shout "Alien's are nordic" then start a race riot
As to your 2nd point...
You cant use controversial sources?
What if he cited some of Americas favorite eugenicist would that help?
Stop being bias and add context, Who were the leading scientist in the 1940's? Where was funding and talent allocated...
You shut your ears whenever you're challenged in the slightest? - I left this comment and went on to enjoy this channels destiny chat because who gives af
Seriously go watch the history channel documentaries if you want peer reviewed archaeology content.
Who clicks on a video titled secret midgets of the old world and expects phd caliber literature to back it up
@@BobbyKrieger Why is a modern-day race theorist using fact sources from the 1940's? Why is a supposedly unbiased race theorist using fact sources that are known to be profoundly biased?
@@mrjones2721 I don’t speak for him, personally I’m open to that information because in science bias occurs on multiple levels
Aside from an ethical bias there’s a financial bias and I’m sure many more
For example x amount of funding for scientific research may be dominated by its future ability to yield capital or current political environment
In the 1940s there were significant financial allocations to research certain anthropology we wouldn’t even begin to fund today
It doesn’t make the person behind it right but if base your research not on the quality of work but the people behind it you’re in for a rude awaking…
Name some of your favorite scientist from the early 1900s I wonder how a lot of personal ideology would stack up today