Lawyer Reviews Amber Heard Interview
Вставка
- Опубліковано 18 чер 2022
- I watched Amber Heard testify in person. The jury had very good reasons to reject her testimony--and they did. Now Amber Heard is fighting hard in the second phase of the trial, which is the court of public opinion. Join me to go over her interview.
And I'm going to be bringing a drink for this one. - Розваги
What 'happened when she came forward' is that she got endless positive press, the biggest role of her life, an ambassadorship with ACLU, a contract with Loreal, a billionaire boyfriend, international invites to talk shows, etc, etc. In contrast, Johnny lost his jobs, his money and his reputation. No one pushed back on her until she wrote the op-ed, so the suggestion that consequences to her speaking up is why Depp's 'other victims' have remained silent is ridiculous.
THIS!!!!!!
EXACTLY!
yes, i was never able to figure out what "wrath" she was referring to in the article
Exactly! I wrote the same things under NBC post in twitter! She got empathy and more jobs! He lost everything!
That’s what I was thinking!!
When news broke about Amber and JD i was working at a domestic violence center. My initial reaction was shock and disbelief. Then I had to sit with myself and ask why did I not believe these claims. And it was simply because I had be an fan of JD since childhood and I had never heard of anything like that from him. Then I accepted that I did not know him personally and that the likelihood of someone lying about that level of DV is lying. I never attacked her online or called her a liar, but I also did not openly support her. I put it in the back of my mind until it resurfaced again. As the audio was revealed her account of what happened became questionable. Then following this trial with Emily D Baker I was hurt that she would lie like this. As child that grew up in a DV household and one that worked with DV victims everyday I knew how harmful this could be to survivors. Then I had renewed faith in people when JD said yes I am a victim of DV. I thought about the handful of men that came to our agency for help. That is when I knew that this terrible thing could be helpful to survivors male and female.
I hadn't heard the audio before the trial, my initial reaction was another one as this was the height of the me too movement. My questioning it was when she didn't get a me too moment and Johnny's exes spoke out and supported him. I knew that didn't definitively say that it didn't happen but it did mean that it was unlikely.
Thank you so much for your point. I had a similar reaction. Although, I must admit that my biases were exposed because I gave HER the benefit of the doubt, as I was a volunteer victims advocate for a while and a survivor myself. Like you, however, I recognized through the audio recordings that Johnny was, in fact, the victim. It was unmistakable. He was the victim, and she the abuser.
I never believed her since she first time appeared with those bruises years ago Even back then they seemed fake to me and to Johnny I am last person like I was never hard fan I mean i had never his poster at my bedroom I know I am weird I was aware of him but was never into him even I was teen My love to him developed tro years
hi I also did the same thing you did. I was in denial about AH claims, but realized that there was a high possibility. I was heart broken but accepted the lies she told. After a couple of years, when the truth was partially revealed, my heart leapt. I did so much reading of articles and I found out JD's side of the story. It turned out this story was so much more evil than what was initially revealed.
Love your comment...
She thought she was going to die from DV but never had to go to the ER or see a doctor or have an X-ray!
Really!!! Come on we are not that stupid!!!
Women get cut down there during childbirth and believe me the smallest cut is so damn painful. It burns every time you try to pee and you walk funny because the slightest rubbing of the skin is unbearable. I’m a survivor of both DA and SA Amber Heard does not and will never represent me or my pain. She’s deceitful,hateful, and clearly a dangerous woman.
I've torn my vagina with rigorous sex alone and when a man has a bigger penis, it's exceptionally easy to tear the vagina and there's no way you can be raped with a broken bottle and not need medical attention. She stole this story from her assistant just like she stole the whole trolls want to microwave my baby which she took from another lawsuit in the UK entitled The Wagatha Christie trial.
She said “when your life is at risk” in the interview but when she testified about the knife, she said she never felt like he’d kill her or felt like her life was at risk. She continues to contradict herself 🤦🏻♀️
She also said she feared for her life earlier. It's always "it is but it isn't but it is" with her. Her testimony is a damn labyrinth where everything is always shifting around and doesn't make any sense.
@@hexadoxical3949 yeah, ask as point blank refusing that she had said something after the audios had just been played for the wood to hear, ..
Camille...You slipped up there didn't you me heard, you said TMZ was alerted"
Amber..."no that's not what I was talking about"😱😱 .
Audio of Johnny saying he had to hide in 5 bathrooms and 2 bedrooms, amber's reply, I was the 1 hiding in a bathroom 😱😱 like wtaf. Our ears were sooooo bias towards Johnny that we just heard what we wanted to hear. Her eyes salad is crazy. When she was infact proven to have a sequence of events, she just acted like Camille hadn't just priced it, it that she didn't hear her, she just kept repeating the same nonsense. And being hit didn't hurt, it was just embarrassing. MEH! then all she could remember was a dirty carpet and blue lights 🙄🙄 insane
1:16:19 - what the hell is that face?! 🤣 you can almost tell what she’s thinking:
‘Keep sad face on. Keep it on, Amber. Yup, this is it, we’re kinda nailing it. Now hold that cos here’s the camera coming!’
Good grief, the overacting here is comical.
Amber admitted she wrote the op-ed about "Johnny and other powerful men like him" in the final rebuttal yet now claims that's not true. Shameless.
I agree, and I love your moniker. Tongue in cheek?
@@sookie.smooth You don't think he actually exchanges socks?
she's a high school drop out, a gold digger and a con artist and it shows
That is why people are invested... she is lying to all of us.
Emily D. Baker keeps saying that when the lawyers are all agreeing, that you should run. It’s *got* to mean something that the lawyers who watched this trial along with those of us did feel the jury got it right. It’s absurd that the media is allowing this to continue to be a conversation. She is an abuser- because at the very least, making allegations like that *is* abuse- and she absolutely doesn’t get to have this huge platform she is getting. As a survivor, it is so infuriating.
Yeah... its almost as if the (media) is a protected class of bullshytters with vested interest in obfuscation of the truthiness
I agree w/u but, from their pov-they give the ppl what they want. It seems clear that, right or wrong, most of us WANT to know what she's thinking...if only for ammo to mock her...the same reason there's MANY documentaries abt Ted Bundy.
They make money and nothing incites clicks more than assisting a liar
Well put!
💜💜💜💜
“ You know that Captain Jack Sparrow isn’t a real person right?”. Emily D Baker talks about how she sounded like she was trying to turn Johnny into a character and have people see him as less then human. Not a bad take from EDB . She tried it more than once in the interview.
Also, as a woman, I’m in my 40’s and have been through a few difficult circumstances in life, and to me her saying she wasn’t sure if the bottle was broken or not made no sense to me. Her entire testimony on that issue made no sense to me…she felt pressure on her pubic bone and thought he was punching? Trust me, when something as awful as she was explaining is happening to you, you know…you don’t mistake it for anything else.
That whole story made *NO SENSE* WHATSOEVER. I mean, you can tell if your partner has a hangnail, ffs. And as someone who enjoys glass toys (& has been a 'size queen' at different points in my life), there is NO. POSSIBLE. WAY. someone can grab a fifth or liter GLASS bottle of liquor, push the upper half of your body back on a counter, & just SHOVE the square end inside someone, nevermind actually try to move said bottle in & out. It just CAN'T happen.
You would need to have copious amounts of lube, a lot of foreplay, and gradually increase your ability to, um, "open up" with smaller items first, while preferably being in a position that ALSO helps you open up; the position she described is one that would CLOSE you up; it might be good for human-on-human action, to make things seem tighter, if that's your thing. But it WILL. NOT. HAPPEN. with a glass item.
Latex or silicone toys (as well as the skin & tissue of human body parts) will compress to a certain degree, and most of them are shaped to fit into that orifice. Items intended for penetration generally are cylindrical & have a tapered and rounded end FOR A *REASON* - you NEED to GRADUALLY widen the opening (particularly if the item to be inserted is large). Even tampons are shaped this way, ffs.
Glass does. NOT. change. shape. It does not compress. Unless in a ridiculously hot room or purposely pre-warmed, glass will feel cool to the touch. You would know IMMEDIATELY that what is touching you is NOT a human body part - cold & hard (& likely smooth) is QUITE different to warm & pliable.
Point blank, I wouldn't have been able to accommodate that square-ended bottle from a 'cold start' even during my most prolific 'size queening' days, even with lube & in the most accommodating position, even after having given birth. I don't think I could have done so with a square glass bottle even WITH a work-up, foreplay, etc. A cylindrical fifth or liter bottle? Maaaaaybe, but even that's going to be hard (heh), because it's not a tapered/rounded end and again, you're looking at a seriously lengthy work up time period using toys gradually increasing in size to help things along.
There is no way that bottle story happened, at least not as stated/written. She even said on the stand that you could still see the bottle on the floor in one of the pictures, confirming that it WAS a square-bottomed bottle.
That whole story, combined with her attempts at crying & seeming SO overwrought, was the moment I *KNEW* she was a liar of the highest degree. I'm not saying a survivor wouldn't get upset to the point of hysteria when retelling her experience with the trauma, even 6+ years later, by breaking down or getting shrill or whatever; I will say that it seems very unlikely for someone to be at that 'top level' of emotion the ENTIRE retelling. IME, people tend to be kind of detached & disassociated from their restating of the experience, and AT TIMES break down or have the emotions leak through. 🤷🏻♀️ It makes it hard to even believe her when she relates events that could be believable, because SO. MUCH. of her testimony is patently & provably false.
Amber Heard lost this case for herself, and in the process, thankfully exposed herself to the world as the lying predator that she is.
Same. I told every man in my life who was interested in this and might not be able to relate by default that having an object inserted in your vagina does not feel like that. You can most certaintly tell you're not just feeling pressure in your pelvic area. And even more so you will feel if said object is broken glass.
The amount of gasslighting this woman appeals to is astounding.
She is a terrible liar. Convoluted story. And she seems to randomly remember to pretend to be emotional. It makes me angry and I wish she was criminally charged.
I'm not a psychiatrist so I don't know if that level of dissociation is possible but she'd definitely know AFTERWARDS - if she woke up in a bed full of blood.
In over 45 years as a clinical psychologist keeping notes, supervising other psychologists and reviewing their files, covering for colleagues who were ill, I have never seen lengthy script notes like this ---- totally not credible.
Yep. Clearly they were manufactured by Heard, the handwriting is too similar.
Yes, that's an essay and not notes 😁
Yeah.... my notes are messy, I use shorthand, lots of abbreviations etc... I might type up later. My notes are to help my client to reference back if necessary plus I use different codes. If I had to notate in longhand I'd have to stop my client flow and that would be awful... then again I deal with children and adults who have experienced real trauma. I'm glad this televised trial has gripped people internationally as, I hope, it will provide an awareness of how horrible people can be to each other. AH is in my opinion the main instigator of violence in that relationship, the jury agreed.
My notes are usually 3-4 lines. It drives lawyers crazy.
1st problem she has is she thinks she's SMARTER than the lawyers. She won't even take her own council advice. Passed notes the whole trail as if she's the expert.
even for her own words she doesn't take responsibility...what value has it then?
I thought she was passing blank post-it-notes. They had a camera pan in.
So arrogant, definitely narcissistic
@@carolmeek9020 Technically we only know for sure that she was faking sometimes, so she may have been actually writing notes at other points.
The look on her 3rd lawyers face when she's passing notes in court, that eye roll was priceless. Especially when she was fake writing because the pen wasn't touching the paper. Omg hilarious it's like everything she does is acting (badly)
Each time AH tried to perform her “I’m a victim/not a victim” testimony, she failed to convince. Just like you, I went into the trial tending to think JD was an abuser. AH convinced me she was a liar each time she spoke. JD, in contrast, appeared credible, even admitting to some wrongs. And like you, I believe JD’s testimony, not AH’s.
I never believed her even she first time appeared with those bruise years ago They seemed to me fake even then and i can tell you I was never any special fan of Johnny
@@Bibiana862 They definitely couldn't compare to Rhianna's that's for sure. I still won't knowingly support anything Chris Brown is involved in. I can't believe he got away with what he did to her.
@@-._.-KRiS-._.- yet according to answer, she was beaten way more times that she couldn't remember how many times he hit her in the face, with chunky rings on, it just made no sense.
I was the same. I even told my daughter he was an abusive waste. Then, I listened to her and the audio recordings. I saw her "truth". She spoke her truth as an abuser.
He DIDN'T promise to ruin you. He SAID it would ruin YOU.
I think @nbc really overstepped a line here, allowing her to speak as if she’s the victim, as if the verdict never happened. Also, when they talked about his Australia injury, they should have played the Australia audio.
PS, I am sick of her. Go away “Amanda!”
The couldn’t play the Australia audio. Everyone whose voice appears on an audio clip has to be available to be questioned about the audio. One of the voices on that audio was that of Jerry Judge, one of Johnny’s security people. Because Jerry Judge has passed away he is obviously unavailable for questioning the audio was inadmissible. It’s a shame because that audio was very revealing and damning, in my opinion.
@@nonoway5985 I meant during the interview.
@@jmmcgee3509 I doubt Amber or her lawyers would have agreed to that being played
@@nonoway5985 The media is not tied by the rulings during the trial. They can most certaintly play any of the leaked tapes or any material they can get their hands on legally (i.e. like TMZ posted the video of JD slamming the cabinet doors).
Love that point about the judge putting a lot of weight into the "donation." I feel like Amber and her team were way to confident due to the results of the UK trial. They also tried so hard to keep the "he's a drug addict and therefore he had to have hit her" narrative going and the US jury didn't buy it the way the UK judge did.
I'm surprised no one started a Petition for *Full UnCut AH Interview* ... and MSM wonders why we all watch UA-cam 🤷🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️
She has the right to free speech, not the right to keep defaming Johnny, the jury and the judge! And it still pisses me off the hear Savannah say we were disgusted by this. Not true! We were all disgusted by AH
I bet the reason why they released the clips over the week was to test the waters and allow us to point out the sections that make AH look really bad so that they could make sure to cut them from the final interview. The two most damning ones being:
“Resources like you or I” and “I shouldn’t have had to donate the money to be believed”
It’s really disappointing because it’s so blatantly dishonest and biased, if they had any integrity as a news outlet then they should let us see the whole truth and stop protecting this abuser and liar
"I know there's much to be made of these.... audio tapes."
Ambers the one who did most of these recordings because she thought it would be used against him,but they show she's the guilty party, yet here she is still trying to manipulate the public into believing her lies.
Imagine what she would have said if she still lost and it wasn't televised. To boldly say all this when you know for a fact the majority all watched the trial. They a very " special" kind of nut
I’ve seen a few reaction vids, and yours is the first that made me look up “speak truth to power” as a concept. Without context, and being cut off by Savannah, I just assumed it was just more concatenated word salad. It’s lovely to see a Wikipedia page describing the concept and showing people that AH is likening herself to like Mahatma Gandhi and Mother Teresa. 🙄
I particularly liked this addendum to the article:
“Noam Chomsky is dismissive of ‘speaking truth to power.’ He asserts: ‘power knows the truth already, and is busy concealing it.’ It is the oppressed who need to hear the truth, not the oppressors.”
Hell yeah!
Mother Teresa was an evil woman that manipulated people and almost certainly embezzled millions of dollars originally meant for charity, so that is actually quite fitting
She did not hand over her devices. She claimed her devices were damaged. JD's team were given it from some online / pc storeage. Jd's expert witness testified to that. Ah's team would not allow talk of colour etc and he was also able to testify to the fact photo's had been manipulated. Not just one, but more than one.
Yep, yet she seemed to have ALOT of 1 sided txt msgs to try incriminate Johnny, I can't believe they were aloud in when they were soooo 1 sided and completely of context. Yet Elaine insisted a msg was kept in, and it wasn't even relevant and just made her look even more delusional
Set aside there is number of takes of the JD breakfast table with coke and his pillbox rearranged at diff angles. Probably it was blocked by the judge to bring but its still there.
I was in a car accident that landed me in the icu for weeks with life threatening and major injuries. I was in severe pain everywhere (my liver was mm away from needing a transplant because the blunt force tore it almost in half). Between the time I was stabilized and waiting for tests results & treatment I had some glass in the bottom of my foot still. I remember begging for tweezers to remove them myself if the nurses were too busy & digging with my nails just trying to get it out. Turd is just so strong & stoic that the glass shards and cuts were able to be ignored ya know?
Sorry you had such an awful time while in the hospital. Our family has a rule, send a healthy family member to advocate for the patient.
Hope you are doing well now 💐
Take a shot every time she tells the complete and unadulterated truth. You'll never have that glass touch your lips.
Does anyone remember that she agreed on the stand it was about Johnny Depp?
Yes!
YES!!
Yes
Not only that but she says, that's why I wrote the op-ed, to talk about THAT phenomenon. Men of power. Pretty rich to say she's a celebrity of much less status than Johnny (D Lister at best) yet she had all the power when she spoke all those lies. Where was Johnny's power then? when he was cancelled.
Australian here. The statute of limitation on dv changes from state to state. Here in Victoria it’s 6 yrs, but where JD & AH we’re staying in Queensland, I believe they dropped any statute of limitations on abuse of any kind. ‘Glassing’ has been an issue here, and I believe if he wanted to, JD could bring a case against AH here still for that particular assault.
I just want to say, for anyone who may have doubts & see my comment- when Emily Baker clocked how Amber wasn’t testifying like other survivors she’s seen, it totally clicked. My sister & I were chatting about the trial & I didn’t realize that we both speak about our past trauma EXACTLY as Emily described & I didn’t notice. Amber was so off with that performance. I’ve been beaten to where I thought for sure I was going to die. The first thing I always think of or say is I SAW STARS, LIKE A CARTOON. Everything went black and I saw stars, flashes. I wasn’t acting out punching & talking about dirty carpet like a damn movie scene. I went to court to press charges. This is not how I behaved. Just thought that might be semi interesting info. ❤️✌🏽
Agreed. I was assaulted on my way home and i remember things slowing down, seeing stars, looking up at the light post and noticed it was flickering off right before the guy finally let go. Afterwards, I found myself in a DV relationship and was beaten in public after a concert. I only remember being hit repeatedly and I’m not even sure what else happened but my Uber showed up and I think someone helped me get in but I don’t remember. No details of the ground or anything. On multiple occasions. She’s something else.
Whoa the establishment trying to stop the truth !!!
They sure are and it speaks VOLUMES!!! They don’t like the TRUTH! Not too smart to do this to attorneys 😂
The statement about the tide already had turned against her when she took the stand is simply not true, I believed her up until she took the stand. Johnny was a great witness, but defamation is difficult to prove in the country in a court of law. it truly was her conflicting testimony, unbecoming conduct in the courtroom, inconsistent behavior to what was testified to, purposely evasive answers to even the simplest of questions, her statements in the audio, her behavior during his struggling addiction phase, her visible anger opposed to the all consuming fear and sadness she stated that she felt that did not come across, and her interactions with the jury which came across as manipulative and forced. It was AH and AH alone that lost the case. If she had not taken the stand maybe she would have won.
Sorry but it actually was very true! Not because Johnny was a bigger star either, those audio tapes were released several years before the Virginia trial and everyone paying attention to what was actually happening knew full well she was the abuser.
Ee
After seeing how Dateline manipulates it’s “storytelling” in this interview, I will never watch it again. I don’t like being manipulated.
if you're bleeding, you check with a dr or a clinic. If you don't want to reveal what really happened, come up with a story or when asked just say I don't know. That way there's still a medical record and the timing would match. Just like Johnny initially did with medical personnel in Australia.
When she says the” hardest thing for anybody talking about sexual violence” - why Dosent she just say “the hardest thing for me, “ she’s supposed to be there to talk about her feelings, instead she’s trying to represent victims
She legit cannot take responsibility for any of her actions. It's typical narc behavior. It's always someone else's fault, someone else has the blame, etc.
That and it undermines her "Poor me" act to use active verbs. Passive language (3rd person) reads as more objective and soft. She wants both to be a strong survivor but also a delicate flower.
That why it smells funny. It's nothing more than perfume on piss.
I’m absolutely convinced AH believes her own hype. She’s now so far down her rabbit hole, she’s unable to distinguish fact (truth) from fiction (lies)
Histrionic and BPD, she absolutely believes it happened because that's how it felt to her so her brain literally reinterprets what actually happened to fit the feeling. The opposite of how most people process things after calming down. Most people see things more clearly after they calm down, she sees things to fit the way she felt. Like Johnny constantly being violent, with Histrionic him trying to leave feels like violence, so that's how she remembers it. Also, in the moment it feels so much like violence she'll react like it was actual violence.
That's all, obviously, assuming Dr Curry's diagnosis is correct, according to UA-cam psychiatrists.
HG Tudor does videos on narcissists, he's also got some pretty convincing videos on her being a narcissist not BPD. It's not too far removed from BPD (it's literally "borderline narcissistic") women tend to be diagnosed with BPD and men tend to be diagnosed narcissist.
It feels like she believes a lot of it but she slips up sometimes. Deep down she knows the truth like all abusers do.
@ Jake And Thanks for the pointer. I can’t get my mind around the idea that she believes her narrative. But. I grew up in a religious cult created by a con man narcissist, and I knew we all believed the hype to differing extents. And it’s very hard to break the mind control even when you know something is fishy. It makes me feel sorry for her a bit. Appreciate very much your input and I’ll check it out.
Even when she answers a question with a lie by the time she finishes she's convinced herself (and noone else). She's not unintelligent so it's a kind of psychosis.
@w rsg23 Borderline Personality Disorder was given that name because a cluster of behaviours associated with this disorder are on the “borderline” between neurosis and psychosis.
She didn't write the oped that's about sexual abuse but then proceeds to make up stories about sexual abuse during the trial...sigh. ALSO...one thing that bugs me is that she claims to have reported abuse by Depp to therapist since 2012...and yet didn't tell a soul about the most heinous sexual assault that she claims happened???? How crazy can one person be??
Didn't she say she's never called herself a victim?! I'm glad they played the previews in advance of the seriously cut full interview. All the most damning revelations are now on the cutting room floor!
Thanks for advocating for us flight attendants. We go through weeks of safety training just to serve a diet coke at 30,000 feet.
What the hell? Whoever suspended this is a pos!
I'm pretty pissed that she's telling victims not to come out with their stories because no one will believe them. Even if she doesn't intend that to be the message, it's evil. I have heard of the possibility of some abusers who using this case as motivation to claim defamation against abuse victims. But if you are telling the truth and have decent legal representation then you should be able to prevail regardless I would very much hope. But ofc if you have bad representation or no money to combat the false claims of defamation then that really sucks
I believe in the concept of the truth will prevail, not always immediately but eventually people see their true colours
What happened when she came forward:L’Oréal contract, ACLU support, speaking engagements, role in Aquaman…
UN work, and something to do with doctors and surgeries in foreign nations.
@@hazelhadley-britt6396 she really met the right people due to Johnny and she wanted to be in all circles
HOW DARE THEY SHUT YOU DOWN LIKE THIS!
So, why did AH's legal team not subpoena all the "witnesses'" to the "attack" on the plane? Because they were his entourage? No, attendants heard or saw anything? I find this very strange, a kid crying on one end of the plane is heard by all and that's a commercial flight. I wanted to give her the benefit of the doubt, believing no one would pursue such hateful lies, but I find I just can't. She doesn't even make sense.
It's 'cause they're all Johnny Depp fans. All of them, including the plane itself and the phone she was recording with. Also them being fans definitely wouldn't change after watching Johnny Depp beat his wife. I'm sure everyone on the plane loved Johnny Depp so much that they would've immediately committed perjury for him. It makes perfect sense.
I think it was a private plane, but she claimed that a flight attendant saw everything aswell as he threatened her could break her wrist. So what was she, I don't who they are, if someone did this to me and I heard that they'd also caused an this"abuse"to another woman, I would want to testify to help this woman
Just as we didn’t have the lady whom allegedly had her wrist gripped by Johnny….
She needs to get help as she has a daughter to raise! Poor child
I have photos of the extreme physical damage inflicted on my daughter by her ex….. he told her he loves her as he was arrested. He would always tell her he loved her after he’d attacked her, she believed him but that particular day was the end of apologies & the marriage.
I hope she is safe and in a better place now.
@@dawnb8123 thank you, yes…. Divorced 8yrs ago, she’s independent, owns her own apartment that she shares with her kids….(who have nothing to do with their dad by choice)
If she really lost her voice she wouldn’t have been able to do the interview. You don’t know or understand what it really means to not have a voice AH. Not to mention that defamation had to be found WITH MALICE, and that was what was found. As for his exes, they came and gave sworn testimonies that he was never abusive. AH AND JD had the same private entrance and the only thing there was a gate. No media or “fans” were allowed beyond the gates or to block the gates. MSM would have made a big deal if there were horrible signs and shouts being made against AH and they didn’t say anything through out the trial. Also there are all kinds of witnesses that were there and can tell you that you were wrong. Not everyone in the gallery were fans. You even had fans of your own at one point. There were lawyers who were simply interested in the trial as that is there job, trials, and to see the lawyers. No one was allowed to talk in the gallery nor could they wear costumes or shirts that indicated who’s side they were on. Those who watched the trial could see this. The public saw her lying and not admitting to any faults throughout the whole trial.
The UK trail was different in so many ways: a) AH wasn’t a party but a witness meaning she didn’t win anything as it wasn’t her case. b) because she was only a witness here level of evidence wasn’t as high. c) the legality is different as it is a different country. d) most of his evidence was denied.
There was no negotiation; that was AH verbally assaulting him and admitting to her doing the physical abuse. She brought in lots of the audio herself and the clips were all longer than 30 seconds. Her lawyers even had the option to bring in longer clips yet they chose not too. She didn’t argue on the stand for anything but DV and SA, so don’t try to twist it or add more now. AH had no evidence to back up her story, and each story got more elaborate each time she told it as well as adding more events. Most, if not all, of her so called abuse would have demanded medical attention as well as days of not weeks of healing. AH had so many other inconsistencies in her stories and so called evidence.
Stop with your twisting of the story about the donation you never made AH. A donation is not the same as a mortgage by any stretch of the imagination. Donation means give them the money then and there, especially when you said “I donated the money”. A mortgage is having a bank pay for the house in full and then you pay the bank back in the form of a loan and if you don’t pay it back you can get into trouble such as loosing the house. No one told her to make the donation. No one told her to announce it publicly that not only did she ALREADY donate the money but that she did it because she wanted nothing in the divorce. AH chose to do both and got caught in doing none of it. That’s all on her. And yes, a large part of a defamation case is all about a person’s credibility so don’t play dumb and act like credibility had nothing to do with it. If it wasn’t a publicity stunt then why wait so long after the divorce was finalized and have the timing of so close to her first major movie role as a superhero to publish it? That seems fishy.
Yes AH, since you said you had pictures then they needed to match with the abuse you described. And not only did they not match the description, but for some events you had the same photos to represent two different dates. She never looked intimidated or scared to talk her supposed SA. AH never had medical records for any of them either and, again, based on her description of those events there would have to be medical records as the the injuries would have been too severe. And it would have taken weeks to recover from. Just because you say something happens doesn’t mean it happens.
Her demeanor and attitude and even the words coming out of her mouth screamed being vindictive. How is AH allowed to give Dateline these so called therapist notes when her current court case hasn’t been closed out and she is appealing it? Therapy notes are more consider medical notes. Also, those so-called notes seem to be in the same handwriting as her handwriting in her’s and JD’s love notebook they shared. Not to mention therapy notes are not long, drawn out words and sentences but rather short, abbreviated notes that are quickly written because they are writing as the patient speaks. They also MUST include dates and times on their notes for their records. AH’s so called notes had none. It is also interesting how this therapist had years of hearing her story yet AH never said her therapist encouraged her to seek help or report it or helped her make a plan. AH had her therapist on her witness list but her team never brought her in. Dr. Hughes also referred to that therapist’s notes during her testify.
Was there a trial by law held in the courtroom? Yes. Was there a trial by the public? Yes. Did the trial by public influence the trial in the courtroom? NO. And there is no evidence to state otherwise. Did the trial in the courtroom influence the trial by public? Yes. We were able to watch the trial from beginning to end and evaluate the witnesses and evidence on our own and make our own conclusion. Then when the public found you in the wrong we the people shared our opinion of you online just as our freedom of speech allows us to do. JD never “promised” any amount of humiliation according the the texts we saw, but simply said it would happen implying it would be because the truth would come out. If you’re going to quote sometime then quote it correctly. She had most of the world on her side for six years simply because she said (with no other evidence) she was the victim and then during the trial it came out she had been lying to us the whole time. Many people had turned their back on JD even though they were fans because of your accusations, they tried to “have your back”. Yes, the world is allowed to feel upset, angry, and hurt for being duped and lied to by you Ms. Heard for so long. And I do believe we the people would look you in the eye/face and tell you what we feel and think of you. Consequences of your actions, dear AH, isn’t always pleasant.
AH, you do care what people think of you or you wouldn’t be doing the interview. You don’t want to keep your private life private as leaked information, wrote an Op-Ed, and are doing interviews sharing details of your private life. Yes, I would telling you that your are being treated fair as this is exactly what you put JD through for six years. Are the extremists taking it too far, maybe; but it’s not the majority. Being called names is nothing. Being called out on your lies is nothing. AH, you have no evidence that any juror member did anything they weren’t supposed to do. Not everyone is attached to SM like AH seems to be. AH doesn’t even know if they have any or which SM accounts. Do not insult these people who had to give up almost two months of their lives to listen to your trial. AH didn’t take responsibility for anything. She tried to come off as perfect and perfect doesn’t exist. So yes, that attitude will impact how people see you AH. And that viewpoint point won’t be good. Also, there were at least 20 witnesses that weren’t on any one’s pay roll/family/friend list. Offended that AH considers “randos” or “average” people as beneath her. There is nothing about her that makes her better than anyone else!
AH thinks so highly of herself that she assumes she has power over other DA cases. AH, you have no power over other cases or victims. Your case was all about you and JD (not to mention it was defamation case only) and EVERY CASE is different and evaluated as such! AH does not speak for anyone but herself. AH, you say you want to focus on being a mom and I’m sure you want to protect her (and that is admirable), yet you weren’t too concerned how two teenagers were going to have to grow up dealing with the mud you dragged their father in for the last six years while silencing his voice at the same time.
Throughout the interview she kept changing the tense of her stories, rarely referred to herself as a victim but says victims react to or do things in third person (which implies she isn’t one) and even slips and says JD would step away (implying yet again that he is the victim). AH is even looking all over the place at times. Several time she would look SG in the eyes let alone face. She also would flip between first and third person (third person implies the person talking wasn’t there doing what was being talked about but simply an observer) and she flipped between present and past tense (implies lying because you cannot keep the story straight). AH needs real help, not just a therapist or psychiatrist who will simply listen to and placate her. It seems that JD has already been seeking help for his issues and is actually getting better. This was a trial between two people NOT social movements contrary to what AH and her team want to believe. This trial isn’t women v men. This also isn’t about taking the right to speak away from anyone but about giving voice to someone who had been silenced. This trial is about finding the truth. In a small way it was about an abuser and a victim. It was about how the stereotypes of who an abuser and victim is is not always right. Abuse doesn’t know gender. Abuse doesn’t know stereotypes. If people really want to make this one case about a movement (which it is not), then JD helped the movement as well as broadened it by showing how a (male) victim can come in with the odds stacked against them, stick to and tell the truth, and then be heard and come out the victor.
Wow- Very thorough & very well said! I'm in awe.
I've seen this on other videos and I'm glad youre leaving this comment everywhere because its a very good summation
Wow, very thorough analysis. I would just like to add two cents to para two idem D the evidence in the UK trial was print media articles about JD instead of police reports! How often does msm get details wrong? And since the judge ruled that the Sun was justified calling him a WB, so do we infer that their headline is NOW evidence? Of course not, since the trial was so unfair. Boggles the mind.
Now THATS A COMMENT!
She’s the only one that hasn’t lost her voice. Her and her minions are trying to silence everyone else.
Watching back. I am in the UK.
Re glassing, My late partner was glassed in the face about 30 years ago when he was a pub landlord and someone decided they didn't want to drink up and leave at closing time. The glass used was a heavy handled pint jug and they shoved it into his face whilst holding the base. Unfortunately, despite the best surgeons available operating he lost his eye as the eyeball itself was lacerated beyond repair. He had to have a prosthetic eye and his face was heavily scarred even after having several plastic surgeries.
Thankfully the pub was next to a blood donation centre so a couple of the customers present were off duty nurses and they were able to give emergency help that saved his life.
I fully support heavy prison sentences for glassing incidents. Sadly the person who glassed my partner was never caught.
It's meant to take your voice. Yet here she is, speaking, freely, on TV, for millions to see. Sureee, she's been totally silenced on the issue.
[Edit - I think the, maybe unconscious, thing about these interviews is that we as the audience know that they're done by somebody that needs to rehabilitate their image. Depp has revealed the truth. I don't think he needs to do anything more, interviews, further action. She could do a million interviews and she will not undo the fact that people have seen the truth.]
So many of us appreciate the great info you bring Runkle. Thanks for teaching us about the law! This interview was insane as expected.
I can't wait to hear your update about what happened! If it's a copyright strike that makes sense but if it's something else... that's shenanigans.
Shenanigans is pure Runkle 💯
Really enjoyed this stream, not just for the commentary but the chat with Law and Lumber too. Thank you. Would give 100 likes if I could.
THANK YOU so much for talking about ADHD so openly. As someone who was diagnosed recently at 40 it helps, it really really helps.
Welcome to the party! I love ADHD people. Always bright sparkly creative etc
@@sookie.smooth Yeah that describes me pretty much!!! Thanks!! Other ADHDers have been so welcoming and helpful, non ADHDers have said it's overdiagnosed ;) Thanks for being kind!!!
The only truth she has ever spoken is "I will stand by my testimony until my dying day". I actually believed that comment...and it gave me shivers!!!
It's really creepy and eerie to watch a person with no sense of self talk because without someone there to give her a persona, she just comes off as a femme bot, just so superficial.
runkle’s face when amber said “one thing i’m not is vindictive” 😂😂😂💀
Too much truth for you, HEARD TEAM?!?!?
“Stream suspended for policy violations”. This is what it shows in my tv.
I'm so annoyed youtube cut this steam off. I was really enjoying this steam and live chat.
Why didn't AH "fans" stay up all night and get in line? There were numerous attorneys in line that got in. Excellent commentary, Runkle! Keep it up.
Son is high functioning autistic misdiagnosed for 14 years. ADHD mimics some of the symptoms. Gave him Adderall and Atenolol in every type of dose possible. His depression was out of control. Meds caused picking of face,top of head,and skin till bloody. Thank God school pyschiatrist saw the truth.
Some of us have both. I think it's part of the spectrum. Glad you were able to get an appropriate diagnosis for him, hope you are both doing well now.
AH sees “positive pro Johnny Depp” signs as “negative/against AH signs”.
This is because ignoring her is the most harmful thing for her!
Because it means she’s not at the center of the attention as she desperately needs to be.
People as I have read thinks that she will never stop because she is vendicative, that all the mocking on social media are hurting her, unfair etc. Well, I disagree.
Whatever comes, as long as people are talking about her, her ego is fulfilled.
She is nothing without JD, ( she could but she doesn’t want!). So her life is bond with JD and she will keep talking, engaging with bad comments ( trough Eve or PR) complaining or whatever as long as people keep talking about her.
I especially that every now and then, in the future, she will do or say something or make her PR team release something to make people talk about her ( negatively, doesn’t matter).
I see her complaining for future injunctions, I see her taking sides ( with Evan Wood) in the Marilyn Manson case, talking about it and even showing at the trial.
She was at the trial in UK for many days and she wasn’t even supposed to be there, even when she wasn’t taking the stand.
She will di everything to keep the attention in her as I bet she’s done as an actress.
She really meant what she got ingraved in the knife “until death”, and she basically said it again in the interview
I wouldn't think she likes negative attention per say but I think she absolutely dreads no attention. More like "picking the lesser of two evils" than "all attention is good attention".
3:00 I think I must have dreamt some of that trial up. Because I'm pretty sure there were also three weeks of testimony about how Depp was 'The monster', crazy, and couldn't be trusted.
I find it really funny how during the entire interview they keep acting like Heard's side never got to speak. The whole point is that the defense (Heard) goes last because it's in your benefit to be able to be the last one to speak and paint a picture without the other side being able to say again that it isn't true.
Heard's side quite literally got the last word.
No Johnny did... he won. Silence speaks volumes
They both started with the same amount of time. Her team wasted a lot cross examining over trivial points. No matter, if she had won, the narrative would have been “how wonderful and powerful the whole process of the court system is”. Mark my words.
I must have too then, I wish dreamt that she only had posted witnesses too, apart from their family members, do they go under the "Rando's section too) 🤣🤣
This is BS! Stream suspended for "Policy Violations". Screw you UA-cam
Striking the most innocent streamer on the planet to save the day. Nice going, Amber's PR team.
She literally said how vindictive she is in her last few minutes on the stand. To paraphrase " I wrote the op Ed because I wanted to take the power away from JD"
The crazy thing is, Johnny Depp isn’t really that powerful. If he was, how did he lose his 6th pirates role and other movie roles just because AH implied some accusations about him? He had fans, but not nearly as many as he has now that she’s really tried to profit off of his demise.
I totally agree he is supposedly so powerful but he lost roles because of her accusations, she had all the power hence why she was given activism platforms and kept roles when he got fired
Such BS.
She seems to be really taking issue of him having a lot of “enablers” around him who sometimes bring him to bed drunk. But its totally fine for her to have her numerous friends (all randos for JD btw) to live off him rent free in a literal way, enablers of her but for his cost.
Thank you for brining light to what ADHD is and how it affects your life! My son has ADD and I fought his schools all the way through for calling him lazy or trying to label him as having various learning disorders. He graduated high school with a 3.5 gpa after we discovered he learned online much better than in a classroom setting.
Edit: My issue with no medical treatment for walking on glass is that she took her dog to the vet for stepping on a bee!!!! Why does your dog get better treatment than you do?? The therapy notes are so not representative of what a health professional writes. We are actually trained in school on the proper procedure for patient notes and I have worked multi state and the procedures are standard practice.
Maybe cuz the medical personnel would see there were no bruises for real. I also agree her presentation of herself as a tough stoic victim and Stockholm syndrome does not reflect the amount of care she surrounded herself with, starting with an army of therapists for various purposes and her support network literally occupying all of JD homes, from ph to the island.
The best part of all this treatment she's getting is it's literally all her fault. She brought all of this onto herself. LOL
Thank you amber, for those months of entertainment. Even my wife is now trying to watch the entire trial lol, she’s enjoying it
They painted a very strange picture here, especially those cut-scenes (is that the word?) like trying to rewrite the truth. Giving the abuser platform to speak is preposterous. Can you imagine if it was other way around - would they do interviews with a male abuser?
So great that the trial was televised. Not only we could see with our own eyes what really happened but also maybe people will see how rotten mainstream media really are! It's bizzare.
I found this video because I have been listening to your take on the sidebars. I forgot how great it was to listen to you and Rob. I really hope the whole gang gets together to cover the Kohberger case.
I recently found your channel from the British barrister, so I am watching this 2-3 weeks late. I have watched the trial online and have been following several lawyers to understand it better. Blackbeltbarrister has helped me understand the differences between our US Constitution (trial by jury) and British laws which I now know that Civil cases in England is no jury.
I have never seen a movie with Amber Heard. She is not comparable to our great actresses. I have seen a couple Depp movies.
Tequila? Which one?
I watched a lot of this interview in bits and pieces before it was aired, but it’s really fun watching it with your feedback. I think Savannah did a great job, especially with a person who is unstable. Like you said, she’s one who is likely to flee. The editing is so annoying, but I’m glad the complete interview is at least online for people to see.
Dont forget the UK judge has a close relative (son, I believe), that worked for the Sun paper. So he, embarrassingly, was biased from the outset and should have excused himself. If she was paid 8 million - well, she can afford to pay johnny, now can't she? But alternatively, also use it to post bond to the court to appeal.
Runkle’s story of the cold takes me back… I left work one day back home (not Canada) after closing the shop (around 22:15 at night), turns out the engine warmer hadn’t started as it should so the car is frozen solid. It’s -30°C and the car was 25 years old, didn’t have servo steering and an extremely bad internal heating system. I didn’t have gloves or a scarf. I was so cold while driving home I was crying.
NBC is big mad
This is so messed up. I get it, the interview didn't give them the views, they were hoping for ... but don't take it out on people who did watch it and try to comment on it. This is fair use. The people who watched this stream belong to two groups. The ones who already watched the interview by themselves. And the ones who will never watch the interview unless someone they know comments on it. (Since the comments / conversation in the chat is the important thing here)
So in either scenario... there are no views lost by letting people comment on it. Smh.
They just want to silence the dissenting opinions to the crafted narrative this production is trying to create.
@happy baby or, the written contract / agreement for the interview states that the final product is to present in her favor.
She’s a liar. Plain and simple. I don’t want to hear about her anymore. She needs to go home and raise her little girl and hopefully not teach her how to lie.
I just want to thank you Runkle for leaving this video up. I didn't get to watch it til now. So I'm very grateful you left it up. Thank you for making it and reacting to the interview upsetting as it is
Savannah should have a section at the end of the show to disclose what the real facts are, like the lines outside. I was also confused by Elaine and her keep using that case at UK between the Sun and Johnny. I thought there was another Depp vs Heard there. Anyhow, as I watch the clippings from dateline, I can’t help but thinking NBC is helping Amber ( to be a victim). Wts, I am glad that you tubers like yourself and Rob are helping us understand the real situation.
As someone with ADHD I am honestly just straight up dumber off my meds. After a streak of 100s on every test I missed my meds and got like a 78. Worse than that though is the fact that off my meds I have no clue what I'll do. I'm constantly terrified thinking I might do something horrible after actually deciding to follow up on a dumb thought I had instead of classifying the thought as stupid and forgetting it. My ADHD isn't a lack of work ethic, it's a psychological inability to even make the decision to exert effort. Whenever I hear someone say it's my fault or some crap like that it makes me incredibly angry. It's victim-blaming and it's wrong.
For financial reasons I skip my meds sometimes (my doctor told me that it's OK on my ones). The rule is that I have to warn my family and close friends when I do, cause they had to pull me out of the way of a bus before... That being said, I don't feel dumber, more like I'm just as surprised as other people regarding what I say or what I do.
@@movingforward3030 I can get that. They recently decided that Vivace was more expensive now and upped the price, so I had to switch to Adderall. They really shouldn't be so expensive.
One comment made by your buddy "Spidey", was spot on and pretty much sums up all these efforts made by ScAmber. During his AH body language analysis, he stated, "Truth Tellers Tell, Liars Sell"...
This statement is very powerful and seems to be what pops into my head every time I hear AH speak!
What AH doesn't understand is that we are buying!!!!!
Correction: ...that we "aren't" buying!!!.
Hmm…the live stream got cut off. Maybe the same strike others have gotten? At least it posted to the channel.
I'm glad the video is back. I enjoy hearing Runkle's insights and commentaries, I couldn't watch it when it started so I was watching the middle of the video when they took it out. Keep up the good work!
18:00 "Again, you went to a lawyer to basically ask if you filed off enough of the serial numbers to avoid a defamation lawsuit" spoken like a true criminal and firearms/weapons lawyer! she shot herself in the foot while she was doing just that lol
TOUCHE!
@@jacquelynbolden2268 And RotB follows that up with "It’s not to take your voice. It’s to silence your lies that are harmful lies." ! The only thing I'll say for her is she unintentionally raised awareness of how she misappropriated actual domestic violence. And was a cottage industry for legal UA-cam channels we normally would't have heard of. So now we can hear what interesting things they have to say about other cases. Let's hope she doesn't start sending people consultant bills for her service lol The public and MSM should be ashamed of themselves for allowing her to get away with this for 6 years (!?) with little effort. "And this has got to stop." um yeah AH it did.
did amber's lawyers file a hearsay objection to your stream
The only thing Big Brother hates more than someone disagreeing, is a bunch of people talking about the holes in their narrative in chat
Yes, and it started with, "What, if any, I mean, wait..."
@@chesneymigl4538
"Objection, hearsay" "You...you asked the question?"
I'm so glad this is back up, I couldn't stay up and watch this live, and was sad it wasn't available the next day, but have been watching out for it!
I truly believe this is no longer only a case of Borderline and Histrionic PD.
Min 59:10 Fascinating! 85,000 apprx photos pulled from AH phone and we saw all the evidence ones in court.. I did not know that TY
Looks like another gets flagged. Either by AH or NBC.
Hope you fight this on grounds of fair use.
Don't let them take you down. I was already giving heads up to other channels that have previously streamed it.
Ian, best commentary on NBC interview. Thank you.
I'm with you all the way, we've had enough, we are so over it. I started watching during the trial, I'm a big fan of channel. Keep up the good work.
Savannah said” there were more ppl waiting for amber in the courtroom “ NO ppl were not there for amber!
Thank you Ian. As ex cabin crew, thank you for what you said and your understanding 🖐️ :)
I like the way she said “it’s a scheme” as opposed to it’s a scam - which is what JD changed his tattoo to say…. I just think that was a deliberate choice…
She admitted on the stand it was about him!
Exactly! I yelled when she changed her answer. Like Wtf we all heard her say it was about him.
She can't even keep up with her own lies
Glad to see this video is back up, Runkle. Looking forward to hearing the final resolution to that "claim" from NBC. You should absolutely finish reviewing the whole interview in a separate Live.
Savanna Guthrie is an attorney and her husband works in the communication industry. Hubby was a consultant in Johnny's pre trial activities.
The uk trial is being analysed by the black belt barrister and to be honest it is really left wanting there are in my mind several issues that would have doubted her honesty and of course the donation issue of which the judge relied on for her honesty even tho there were definate issues re her attempting to manipulate her PA to lie for her to get her dogs in Australia and there are emails to this effect but her lawyer advised against it again on the email ! and bc the PA didnt sign anything to this effect the judge then dismissed this, just weird that the judge appeared not to want to investigate further it stinks !!! very interesting watching the black belt barrister learned such a lot .
Love Love LOVE you being open about ADHD and yes, normalizing it!
I love hearing your thoughts on things, Ian! Thank you so much! You’ve become such a beloved creator here on UA-cam, and I am totally here for it ❤️
People saying Heard needs mental help...her main problem isn't something that can be fixed, only 'controlled'. You can't unmake a narcissist or sociopath etc. With those major personality disorders, the person is broken, they are missing a piece. You can only teach those people how to act in ways that don't upset other people as much, and that's ONLY if they see some profit in attempting it in the first place -- since they will *never* see anything wrong with themselves and don't care about anyone else.
That missing piece is called a soul.
I love listening to your commentary Ian! I’m across the big lake from CA and at times I feel Canadian ha! Your take and your humor is refreshing Keep up the great work on your channel! Best to you and Mrs R ❤️🇺🇸
Glad to be able to finish watching this review after the NBC copyright block.