Thanks 1992 wc... You gave birth to 2 superstar batsmen ....sachin & lara....and great legends like imran/ wasim /inzamam.... Feilding superstar Jonty rhodes👍
Imran khan was the last phase of his career in 1992. Instead you should have added Mushtaq Ahmed,aaqib javed and Moin khan. From India, Sachin and srinath
The only indian batsman who could score runs in this worldcup was azharuddin. He scored 4 half centuries in this tournament and his 93 against australia almost took the game away from aussies. Allan borders direct throw hit the stumps to get azhar run out otherwise it would have turned out to be the best knock of the 1992 worldcup.
@riyazahmed208 right.India went to Australia in November 1991 and stayed there till world cup 1992(March). Back in 1989-1991, Sanjay manjrekar was scoring good amount of runs and everybody had huge amount of expectations from him to do well in australia. But instead, Sachin emerged as a hero in that tour cum world cup.
I still remember this March . I was 11 years old.... India lost but just prior to Bensen and Hedges World Cup, India had tormented West Indies in the Tri Nation Cup
That era was different in many aspects from present day cricket. Neither bat or ball was dominant. Secondly many teams were reluctant to bring new players in big tournaments and relied on the names of many ageing cricketers. Game was slow to develop but climax was equally exciting. Bowlers had some respect.
It was only case for West Indies not for other team. West Indies team started to decline slowly when viv richards retired. They only depends upon few players like Richie Richardson, Curttly Ambrose, Courtney Walsh, Ian Bishop and Brain Lara. Brain kara was only batsmen in 90s as an great batsmen rest were 80s players and they were aging. There was no great bowler emerged in 90s and batsmen except brain lara. @@karthikvasudevan5477
In those era first 20 overs means 60-70 runs and in last 15 overs or 10 overs trying to play 20-20. In 1996 wc ,Sri Lanka has changed the scenario ,to score 100 in first 15 overs .
No it was started in 1992 World Cup itself by mark greatbatch . The master planner was Martin crow. his over ambition only spoiled this World Cup otherwise new Zealand was the best side of this cup.
Indian team paid heavy price for inclusion of prabhakar in 92&96wc
3 роки тому+2
In 1992 Prabhakar was India's one of the spearhead. India simply could not cope with pace and bounce of the pitch. This was India's first tour in Australia after 6 years. For nearly all the batsmen it was first time visit.
Though it was a poor team, luck didn't favor us this tournament V lost close games to aus and eng by 1 and 9 runs respectively which should have won comfortably Srilanka game wash out and rain affected v saf and Wi didn't help either... But has to be said Ravi shastri was the chief architect of the despair in this world Cup... The guy couldn't get the ball off the square... And Sad to see Kapil too dropping a catch, which signalled his end Only azhar and sachin came out of this world Cup with some positive feedback
Indian cricket is so much about could and should that one doesn't have to struggle to find answers to a few why's... 1.Why despite BCCI dominating matters off the field why Team India can't dominate on it? 2. Why despite the systematic murder of seaming tracks - Team India's bette noire - is the team still struggling for consistency? 3. Why despite the BCCI organizing regular bilateral series with the West Indies - despite their perennial decline - is Team India still trailing in head-to-head meetings? 4. Why despite all the pitch alterations does Team India still have a negative record against all major Test teams? 5. Why despite of all the unnecessary hype, media coverage and fan following is Team India yet to dominate like the Windies team of 1970s and 1980s or the Australian team of the 1990s and 2000s? 6. Despite BCCI having most cricket boards at their mercy, tweaking things as per convenience why can't Team India win consistently on the field? 7. Why can't Team India not dominate a sport that is on continues decline? The answers to all the questions lies in the coulds and shoulds. When you can't dominate in a third world sport, with all things going in your favor, no wonder you have only 28 medals to show in 28 Olympics, and in 120 years of participation. No could and should here. It is a lot more clearer.
@@paremayank coz Siddhu in the preceding test series against Australia performed poorly, putting doubts on his ability to counter high quality pace bowling. Of course, Shastri and Prabhakar were worse than him.
1991 wc produced many matches affected by bad weather conditions. India/RSA/WINDIES badly affected by these on the one side and ENG/PAK got benifit on the other side (undoubtedly they played too very well when mattered so nothing to take away). But 1991 wc was the only wc in which bad weather conditions changed whole scenario of the wc. If all matches played fully certainly teams in the semi finals and final would have been different and so will be the champions too.
I am sure you didn't watch anything in that WC, perhaps just read some biased report somewhere. Pakistan was easily winning it's game against SA but rain intervened and handed over the game to SA, though they got a little return gift from the rain God back in their game against England. Then SA were undone in the Semi Final against England though it can't be said for certain that SA would have won if the full game was possible, 22 from 13 was a big ask in those days and when you consider they were into their tails then even more so. India was poor throughout and even Shastri's home was bombarded with rotten tomatoes and eggs after the defeat against England after a fans frustration that was build over few games, so they were never in contention for Semis at all. WI had themselves to blame for their pre SF exit and partly the destiny for the two games, Pak vs SA and Pak vs Eng, if any of that has different results then WI would have been in SF.
sachin 1992 started learning his mistakes in his 1st world cup, then top scorer in 1996, 2003 and 2nd top in 2011 world cup (but 1st top scorer amongst indian player) and overall top scorer in world cup series
At this point, B Lara was definitely more powerful and impact player than S Tendulkar. What a shot man !! Kambli should have being included instead of AMRE
@@allinone-crickettravelfun2900 impact is impact. whether u open or close. all the worlds greatest batsmen were not openers, so stop this habit of backing sachin sachin all the time. in many ways Lara is anytime better than sachin overall
@@BlokeBritish sachin is the complete batsman unlike inconsistent so called flamboyant brain Lara...pathetic record against India...on the other hand sachin is creating records and carrying millons of hope....so stop saying Lara.. 😂
Those days...Hitting a six off kapildev is like a dream come true...Very seldom batsmen hit six off kapil's over...becoz he doesn't give too much length to hit for a six.
Azar is better batsman than Lara,Tendulkar and even the media ,magazines mentioned ,he bat's most of his career in 3,4,5,6.and scoring over 9k runs is not ordinary thing.if Lara,Sachin,jayasurya batted at that positions think.example in 2002 natwest series,india famous win in england vs england in finals,Sachin batted at 4 ,failed .next series again batted opening.
Prior to the world cup, India dominated West Indies twice in a triangular series. First was in sharjah were Pakistan emerged as a winners and second in Australia were the host were ended up as champions. Hence India after 2 close early losses and 2 wins thereafter look favourites to win the clash against the Carribeans who were than on decline....Unfortunately Indian batting crumbled after position of strength and Lara dismantle their attack in quick time ...India lost the game they expected to win and than knocked out of the tournament
When lara was a super batsman ,sachin was just a spectator . Sachin got recognization after 1996 world cup. Lara had scored already 375 ,278 and many scores in tests .In one day 169,152 and many other match winning knocks. Lara is a superstar match winner ..while sachin focused on his records only wanted to surpass lara and saeed anwar . Such a selfish short little guy. Never played for his nations pride.
Idiots like you don't understand the greatness of Sachin, 68 times india won when sachin scores century, First know about our players then comment, you people are unfit to talk about legends like sachin.
It was heartbreaking to see India lose this match...India had upper hand against West Indies in the recently concluded B&H tri-series and were favourites to win this after thumping wins against pak ,zim but probably were overconfident and too casual in their approach...this match was one which really started signalling the end of India's chances in this wc..😭
Tendulkar catch was dropped by the keeper earlier still he managed to score four runs only and see what real maestro lara did there... what a shame for indian great 😔
How many I watched . I love u watch again.i love 1992 w c...never ever again n jersys also..I want to see those jersys in next wc....2019 eng tried but not beaten...but 👌👍
I recall this day so very well. This day i had one of the papers of my final examination for Grade/Class VII. Sadly, i flunked that grade and had to repeat the year :( Will remember this particular day as i had not prepared for my exam (was not good in academics overall) and was totally blank before entering the examination hall. That day still haunts me. Anyway, that's life. I turned out alright in life ;)
How sad the selectors took V Raju with the team but not Anil Kumble ..... and great Srinath bowling after M Prabhakar is done sucking up the opponents.
Don't know about the selection toss up between kumble and V Raju but Prabhakar was a gun bowlers back in the day whereas Srinath was still new to the scene
@@mrdaman99 I didn't know that. As of what I recall there were only three players in the Indian side that deserved a place in international sport; Sachin, Srinath and great Anil Kumble. All the others were laxy and throwing their carreer and team.
Contrasting mindset quite evident : India sends Jadeja to open and Sachin in the middle order whereas West Indies send Lara to open, that's intent and boldness
Both Jadeja and Srikanth were specialist openers. And Srikanth used to be most attacking batsman of India. Sachin was an established middle order then , and pitches & grounds of Australia were not very conducive for 15 over rules. Only NZ's small grounds helped lofted shots. After this WC, the spectators showed immense interest in power play batting, hence world wide pitches were made flat sich that stroke maker can play big shots against new balls.
Lara was already playing for some time by then and it is similar to how Tendulkar was sent to open in 1994. No one knew whether Tendulkar could do opening especially against the new ball in 1992 since he was relatively new to the team and a solid middle order player. Remember, Azhar even tried Kapil as opened against Zimbabwe in that same tournament
@@ashishgoyal6281 BCCI made Kapil the scapegoat for India's loss in the semis of the 1987 WC against England. They therefore made sure he never captained India ever again, despite the fact Kapil contrary to managers Ajit Wadekar and BS Bedi was on good terms with the team, barring Shastri and Prabhakar.
You need to learn the basics of showing highlights of a cricket match. Some logo is either covering the scoreboard or the scoring details of the batsman who just got out. Viewers are missing all this.
@@sizzlingschumi9005 u cant monetize all video brother. since some of the video will not allow. these videos i will edit and make into a shorter format so few videos are allowing...
1996 cricket world cup is the most unique world cup ever played among the 19 cricket world cups till date ( including 7 T20 world cups). Below are few facts : 1. Only world cup to be won by a co-host nation. Sri Lanka won final in Lahore and not on home soil 2. Only final in which both captains were left handed batsman 3. Only final match to be held in pakistan 4. Pakistan is the only country which hosted a world cup final without hosting a semi final match !!!! 5. Only final to have a century in a success full chase. Arvinda di silva scored 107. 6. Only time world cup trophy was handed over by head of a state. Benazir bhutto the then PM of Pakistan handed over the trophy to arjuna ranatunga. 7. 1996 world cup is the only tournament in which both finalists despite being in the same group never faced each other in earlier stages of the tournament. Australia did not go to sri lanka for its pool game due to security reasons and sri lanka was given 2 default points 8. Arvinda di silva is the most productive man of match player with 107 runs 3 wickets n 2 catches 9. Sanath jayasurya is the least productive all rounder to win player of series award 10. Only world cup final among the 4 final match appearances of Glen McGrath where he went wicketless 11. Only 50 over world cup match till date in which sri lanka beat Australia 12. Only World cup when India played at Eden Gardens Calcutta in 50 over world cup !!!! 13. Only 50 over world cup in which West indies lost a semi final match 14. 1996 was the last time West indies reached semi final stage in 50 over world cup 15. Ind vs Sri Lanka semi final, only test or odi in history which was awarded due to rioting crowd !! 16. Only World Cup in sub continent when India did not host the final match. 17. Only World Cup final in which Glen McGrath and Shane warne went wicketless 18. Only World cup where all semi finalist belonged to same group
Brian was true hero in cricket who played ferociously.
Thanks 1992 wc...
You gave birth to 2 superstar batsmen ....sachin & lara....and great legends like imran/ wasim /inzamam.... Feilding superstar Jonty rhodes👍
Imran khan was the last phase of his career in 1992.
Instead you should have added Mushtaq Ahmed,aaqib javed and Moin khan.
From India, Sachin and srinath
You forgot Sanath jaysurya and Andy Flower.
Lara is so elegant With his bat swings, cover drive ,cuts and pulls.
Solid hitting by lara,,,,,,I am big fan of lara ...i am from india
It clears by your name that you are from India
The only indian batsman who could score runs in this worldcup was azharuddin. He scored 4 half centuries in this tournament and his 93 against australia almost took the game away from aussies. Allan borders direct throw hit the stumps to get azhar run out otherwise it would have turned out to be the best knock of the 1992 worldcup.
Even a young Sachin scored good amount of runs in this wc...
Aap bhul rhe h ki is world cup me Sachin ne do maicho me half century lgayi thi aur dono match ke man of tha match the
Wahi dono match India ne jita tha
@@ashishdiwan1055Bilkul . Sachin was the wonder boy of india in this wc.
@riyazahmed208 right.India went to Australia in November 1991 and stayed there till world cup 1992(March). Back in 1989-1991, Sanjay manjrekar was scoring good amount of runs and everybody had huge amount of expectations from him to do well in australia. But instead, Sachin emerged as a hero in that tour cum world cup.
Lara is the best player in thia world , nobody player in this world like lara , really we missed lara
Love from india
Right
Right
❤❤❤❤❤
Lara in Tests undisputed best 👌
Ya ....we have seen his records in icc knockouts.....absolutely pathetic
West Indies bowler without helmet srikant 💥💥💥💪
Without a brain either
Azar and Lara batting super 👌
I still remember this March . I was 11 years old.... India lost but just prior to Bensen and Hedges World Cup, India had tormented West Indies in the Tri Nation Cup
Tendulkar and Lara face some of the best bowlers--so people should never compare these guys to them.
My favourite was Mr.Azheruddin,1203 🏏🇮🇳🏏
Childhood memories 💜 wakeup at 4 am to watch the best world cup ever in my whole life i never forget 1992 world cup❤
Same feeling
Golden era of true cricket.
Yes good bowling quality
That era was different in many aspects from present day cricket. Neither bat or ball was dominant. Secondly many teams were reluctant to bring new players in big tournaments and relied on the names of many ageing cricketers. Game was slow to develop but climax was equally exciting. Bowlers had some respect.
Batsmen were quite defensive snd always started slow
Wasn't the case with West Indies it seems. Evident from this very match 😊
It was only case for West Indies not for other team. West Indies team started to decline slowly when viv richards retired. They only depends upon few players like Richie Richardson, Curttly Ambrose, Courtney Walsh, Ian Bishop and Brain Lara. Brain kara was only batsmen in 90s as an great batsmen rest were 80s players and they were aging. There was no great bowler emerged in 90s and batsmen except brain lara. @@karthikvasudevan5477
True west Indies produced attacking batsmen through the years
These batsmen these days depends on power,Lara was jus style..
14:12 the golden commentary by the commentor.. One of the best player in the world Sachin Tendulkar.. Just in 19 years old 😍😍😍😍
SACHIN THE BRAVE MAN OF CRICKET HISTORY. MY MAN SACHIN. VERY INTLIGENCE AND BRAVE MANNERSE.
Players*, not player
Lara brave batsman and real match winner king
In those era first 20 overs means 60-70 runs and in last 15 overs or 10 overs trying to play 20-20.
In 1996 wc ,Sri Lanka has changed the scenario ,to score 100 in first 15 overs .
Bilkul sahi
That strategy was changed in this tournament itself by Martin Crowe & company
No it was started in 1992 World Cup itself by mark greatbatch . The master planner was Martin crow. his over ambition only spoiled this World Cup otherwise new Zealand was the best side of this cup.
Even before Sri lanka, it was Martin crowe's NZ
Delight to watch Brian Lara those days
Hitting six was almost dream for many batsmen...
Brilliant catch by TENDULKAR .
Lara showing his class
Indian team paid heavy price for inclusion of prabhakar in 92&96wc
In 1992 Prabhakar was India's one of the spearhead. India simply could not cope with pace and bounce of the pitch. This was India's first tour in Australia after 6 years. For nearly all the batsmen it was first time visit.
He was a paid actor
1992 was challenging conditions. You can call him names for his performance in 1996 WC.
That was the time when zonal qouta was followed in bcci
Shifarishi player tha😝
# always refreshing to watch old highlights! #warriors!
My favourite Sachin ❤❤❤
Jadeja 21 ( 63) Srikant 40 (70) partnership 61 (133) , which means consuming almost 25 overs for just 61 .Ind scored 136 in back 25 overs.
Cricket on top that time for boring game
Are bhai 18,mein 60,ho gaya tha kya,dekha hai
Same was the story in 1992 south africa tour, where jadeja and wv raman would play in a similar way
Phir bhi bahut kam run , last batter kam small 20 , 30 runs or to ye match ban sakata tha
Though it was a poor team, luck didn't favor us this tournament
V lost close games to aus and eng by 1 and 9 runs respectively which should have won comfortably
Srilanka game wash out and rain affected v saf and Wi didn't help either...
But has to be said Ravi shastri was the chief architect of the despair in this world Cup... The guy couldn't get the ball off the square...
And Sad to see Kapil too dropping a catch, which signalled his end
Only azhar and sachin came out of this world Cup with some positive feedback
Indian cricket is so much about could and should that one doesn't have to struggle to find answers to a few why's...
1.Why despite BCCI dominating matters off the field why Team India can't dominate on it?
2. Why despite the systematic murder of seaming tracks - Team India's bette noire - is the team still struggling for consistency?
3. Why despite the BCCI organizing regular bilateral series with the West Indies - despite their perennial decline - is Team India still trailing in head-to-head meetings?
4. Why despite all the pitch alterations does Team India still have a negative record against all major Test teams?
5. Why despite of all the unnecessary hype, media coverage and fan following is Team India yet to dominate like the Windies team of 1970s and 1980s or the Australian team of the 1990s and 2000s?
6. Despite BCCI having most cricket boards at their mercy, tweaking things as per convenience why can't Team India win consistently on the field?
7. Why can't Team India not dominate a sport that is on continues decline?
The answers to all the questions lies in the coulds and shoulds.
When you can't dominate in a third world sport, with all things going in your favor, no wonder you have only 28 medals to show in 28 Olympics, and in 120 years of participation. No could and should here. It is a lot more clearer.
@@vickym7445 waqai sochne wali baat hai
Even azhar is always look disgusting bullshit player in his whole career,
Why sidhu wasnt in the squad for this world cup
@@paremayank coz Siddhu in the preceding test series against Australia performed poorly, putting doubts on his ability to counter high quality pace bowling. Of course, Shastri and Prabhakar were worse than him.
What a delight to watch legends play... just Cricket...
Lara was jus pure class very aggressive and plays shots no other batsman play the late cut the cover driver etc
Those were the days when in the morning when we check the score
Tab tak kaaam lag Chuka hota😅
Which channel was it broadcasted?
@@ashutoshmishra310 channel 9
1991 wc produced many matches affected by bad weather conditions. India/RSA/WINDIES badly affected by these on the one side and ENG/PAK got benifit on the other side (undoubtedly they played too very well when mattered so nothing to take away). But 1991 wc was the only wc in which bad weather conditions changed whole scenario of the wc. If all matches played fully certainly teams in the semi finals and final would have been different and so will be the champions too.
I am sure you didn't watch anything in that WC, perhaps just read some biased report somewhere. Pakistan was easily winning it's game against SA but rain intervened and handed over the game to SA, though they got a little return gift from the rain God back in their game against England. Then SA were undone in the Semi Final against England though it can't be said for certain that SA would have won if the full game was possible, 22 from 13 was a big ask in those days and when you consider they were into their tails then even more so. India was poor throughout and even Shastri's home was bombarded with rotten tomatoes and eggs after the defeat against England after a fans frustration that was build over few games, so they were never in contention for Semis at all. WI had themselves to blame for their pre SF exit and partly the destiny for the two games, Pak vs SA and Pak vs Eng, if any of that has different results then WI would have been in SF.
sachin 1992 started learning his mistakes in his 1st world cup, then top scorer in 1996, 2003 and 2nd top in 2011 world cup (but 1st top scorer amongst indian player) and overall top scorer in world cup series
Lara super👌 batting
इंडिया हार गई थी पर वचपन की यादे है इसलिए आंनद आ गया वचपन याद आ जाता है 👍👍
At this point, B Lara was definitely more powerful and impact player than S Tendulkar. What a shot man !! Kambli should have being included instead of AMRE
Cause Sachin was playing at 6. The whole world saw how impactful Sachin was when he started to open!
@@allinone-crickettravelfun2900 impact is impact. whether u open or close. all the worlds greatest batsmen were not openers, so stop this habit of backing sachin sachin all the time. in many ways Lara is anytime better than sachin overall
@@BlokeBritish sachin is the complete batsman unlike inconsistent so called flamboyant brain Lara...pathetic record against India...on the other hand sachin is creating records and carrying millons of hope....so stop saying Lara.. 😂
@@bvktechtube979 this is why Sachin couldn't make 300 in test. Sachin was able to break Lara's record only after his retirement.
@@BlokeBritish absolutely well said
Those days...Hitting a six off kapildev is like a dream come true...Very seldom batsmen hit six off kapil's over...becoz he doesn't give too much length to hit for a six.
Superb batting by Lara and Azhar. Two of the most elegant batsmen ever
Lara ko azhar se compare kr rahe ho kmaal h .lara jaisa koi nahi duniya m
@@dharmenderjakhadpalwaliya4401 Azhar was not a ordinary batsman
@@santoshpandey6558 azhar was not a ordinary batsman I agree.but lara is greatest in the universe
Azar is better batsman than Lara,Tendulkar and even the media ,magazines mentioned ,he bat's most of his career in 3,4,5,6.and scoring over 9k runs is not ordinary thing.if Lara,Sachin,jayasurya batted at that positions think.example in 2002 natwest series,india famous win in england vs england in finals,Sachin batted at 4 ,failed .next series again batted opening.
Prior to the world cup, India dominated West Indies twice in a triangular series. First was in sharjah were Pakistan emerged as a winners and second in Australia were the host were ended up as champions. Hence India after 2 close early losses and 2 wins thereafter look favourites to win the clash against the Carribeans who were than on decline....Unfortunately Indian batting crumbled after position of strength and Lara dismantle their attack in quick time ...India lost the game they expected to win and than knocked out of the tournament
my all time favorite! my prince charming brayan lara!
When lara was a super batsman ,sachin was just a spectator . Sachin got recognization after 1996 world cup. Lara had scored already 375 ,278 and many scores in tests .In one day 169,152 and many other match winning knocks. Lara is a superstar match winner ..while sachin focused on his records only wanted to surpass lara and saeed anwar . Such a selfish short little guy. Never played for his nations pride.
Idiots like you don't understand the greatness of Sachin, 68 times india won when sachin scores century, First know about our players then comment, you people are unfit to talk about legends like sachin.
@@suryamagicclass3898 it’s because he played around 500 Odis and 200 test matches . Ponting and Lara did not have to play that much of matches .
It was heartbreaking to see India lose this match...India had upper hand against West Indies in the recently concluded B&H tri-series and were favourites to win this after thumping wins against pak ,zim but probably were overconfident and too casual in their approach...this match was one which really started signalling the end of India's chances in this wc..😭
Westindes was really king of crickey
Asking sachin to sit in the benches was the biggest crime. Plus that shashtri and prabhakar.
I like to see batting of Lara
Sachins dismisal was a beauty of a delivery!
Tendulkar catch was dropped by the keeper earlier still he managed to score four runs only and see what real maestro lara did there... what a shame for indian great 😔
@@amardeeplmz8068 you can't judge a player by his performance in one game...
@@amardeeplmz8068, tendulkar was overhyped chocker. Just padded his stats against nimimbia, Kenya , Zimbabwe and Bangladesh.
@@intelligentdude7108 hence he averages 44 against ozzies
@@intelligentdude7108not talking about lara
Azhar great batsman in the world
Outstanding West Indies 🤞✌️
Lara.. too good
Mohammad Azharuddin was leading scorer for India in 1992 World Cup
Sachin’s catch in this match was awesome
Lara and azhar both were so elegant
OMG!!! that flick 😁😁😁
Yehi waala match world🏆cup 1992 mere janam ke 2Saal baad kaa hai yehi waala match
Mera janam hua tha 13March 1990 ko
Love u india
How many I watched . I love u watch again.i love 1992 w c...never ever again n jersys also..I want to see those jersys in next wc....2019 eng tried but not beaten...but 👌👍
Cricket will always miss the Great Lara.
I recall this day so very well. This day i had one of the papers of my final examination for Grade/Class VII. Sadly, i flunked that grade and had to repeat the year :(
Will remember this particular day as i had not prepared for my exam (was not good in academics overall) and was totally blank before entering the examination hall. That day still haunts me.
Anyway, that's life. I turned out alright in life ;)
congrats
He Saeed anwar and ganguly were so elegant to watch
My favorite team Hindustan 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
It is india, not hindustan
Muhammad Azharudeen is Real Hero of India.💖
V.RICHARDS SUPERB.
First time i see sachin catch super
all time legend Srikkanth
Larra is class Perfect batsman
Captain Azharuddin 92 world cup indian hero👍
Although India won only two matches, they had close encounters with Australia, England and South Africa in this WC.
When indian batsmen were playing outfield looks very slow and very defensive approach followed by indian batsmen.
I have seen Srikanth's batting first time.He was also a pitch hitter.
Kis angle se yh pinch hitter the... 40 run 70balls....overall stats Mai strike rate 63 ka tha in bhai sab ka ODI Mai🤣
Brian Lara was streets ahead of Sachin Tendulkar , Lara played match winning innings , Tendulkar never played such innings
Azharuddin took the revenge of this defeat in 96 world cup by destroying West indies badly
Legend was born
Brain Charles lara
Azhar ur din also played well
Well done winidies my favourite lara played well
Good Video G.
Lara announced his arrival with this one
Great work!
Azharuddin the magician with the bat and also a very good captain..
Azhar is match fixer
How sad the selectors took V Raju with the team but not Anil Kumble ..... and great Srinath bowling after M Prabhakar is done sucking up the opponents.
Don't know about the selection toss up between kumble and V Raju but Prabhakar was a gun bowlers back in the day whereas Srinath was still new to the scene
@@mrdaman99 I didn't know that. As of what I recall there were only three players in the Indian side that deserved a place in international sport; Sachin, Srinath and great Anil Kumble. All the others were laxy and throwing their carreer and team.
Kapil dev also miss the catch 15:16 unfortunate time
Best World Cup clothing 1992 World Cup clothing ❤️👍🙏🙄
AGREE
Two legendary left handers of 90s lara and jayasuria announced themselves at world stage by smashing manoj parbharkar
Parbarkar is big big looser
Lara never miss u
Every Lefhander hammered legend sir manoj prabhakar badly,, 🤣 first lara then in 1996world cup jayasuriya and saeed anwar🤣
Prabhakar is a hammer 🔨 expert 🤣🤣🤣
Saeed Anwar? Wrong answer . Prabhakar was not in that Banglore quarter finals match
Prabhakar chutiya cricketer tha
Don't know why they took him instead of legends like Madan Lal or Roger Binny.
They are just two not every
Keith Arthurton was a wonderful fielder and a good batsman but sadly he never did justice to his potential
Is this our opener Gordon 🤔👀😳
he was a decent spinner too
Whats surprising to me is most batsman didn't wear helmet bating
yeah sachin never seemed to play without helmet. he is role model in following safety rules too
This was my favorite WI eleven ( enter walsh)
13:56 Kieron Pollard 😜
Pollard se bh khatarnak tha Richardson
Lovely this world cup changed the way people looked at cricket
@ Pakistan never deserved the world cup
Contrasting mindset quite evident : India sends Jadeja to open and Sachin in the middle order whereas West Indies send Lara to open, that's intent and boldness
Why is Kapil Dev not caption
Both Jadeja and Srikanth were specialist openers. And Srikanth used to be most attacking batsman of India.
Sachin was an established middle order then , and pitches & grounds of Australia were not very conducive for 15 over rules. Only NZ's small grounds helped lofted shots.
After this WC, the spectators showed immense interest in power play batting, hence world wide pitches were made flat sich that stroke maker can play big shots against new balls.
Sachin was bot a great player then....nobody knew his potential till d tour of pakistan
Lara was already playing for some time by then and it is similar to how Tendulkar was sent to open in 1994. No one knew whether Tendulkar could do opening especially against the new ball in 1992 since he was relatively new to the team and a solid middle order player. Remember, Azhar even tried Kapil as opened against Zimbabwe in that same tournament
@@ashishgoyal6281 BCCI made Kapil the scapegoat for India's loss in the semis of the 1987 WC against England. They therefore made sure he never captained India ever again, despite the fact Kapil contrary to managers Ajit Wadekar and BS Bedi was on good terms with the team, barring Shastri and Prabhakar.
Super beautiful
In this World cup Only Azhar and Sachin performed. Kapil played his role but others failed.
Kapil Dev was the hero on that era against WI.
You need to learn the basics of showing highlights of a cricket match. Some logo is either covering the scoreboard or the scoring details of the batsman who just got out. Viewers are missing all this.
Ok bro. From the original video itself its covering the scorecard bro.
Have you monetised this video and other cricket vids
@@sizzlingschumi9005 u cant monetize all video brother. since some of the video will not allow. these videos i will edit and make into a shorter format so few videos are allowing...
Briliant batting by azhar
Match taf thi , but six Jodi ne clean up Kiya ,
If sachin had opened it could have been different at least when ravi Shastri had left the world cup
84ball 61was good by azhar
Very big ground
1996 cricket world cup is the most unique world cup ever played among the 19 cricket world cups till date ( including 7 T20 world cups). Below are few facts :
1. Only world cup to be won by a co-host nation. Sri Lanka won final in Lahore and not on home soil
2. Only final in which both captains were left handed batsman
3. Only final match to be held in pakistan
4. Pakistan is the only country which hosted a world cup final without hosting a semi final match !!!!
5. Only final to have a century in a success full chase. Arvinda di silva scored 107.
6. Only time world cup trophy was handed over by head of a state. Benazir bhutto the then PM of Pakistan handed over the trophy to arjuna ranatunga.
7. 1996 world cup is the only tournament in which both finalists despite being in the same group never faced each other in earlier stages of the tournament. Australia did not go to sri lanka for its pool game due to security reasons and sri lanka was given 2 default points
8. Arvinda di silva is the most productive man of match player with 107 runs 3 wickets n 2 catches
9. Sanath jayasurya is the least productive all rounder to win player of series award
10. Only world cup final among the 4 final match appearances of Glen McGrath where he went wicketless
11. Only 50 over world cup match till date in which sri lanka beat Australia
12. Only World cup when India played at Eden Gardens Calcutta in 50 over world cup !!!!
13. Only 50 over world cup in which West indies lost a semi final match
14. 1996 was the last time West indies reached semi final stage in 50 over world cup
15. Ind vs Sri Lanka semi final, only test or odi in history which was awarded due to rioting crowd !!
16. Only World Cup in sub continent when India did not host the final match.
17. Only World Cup final in which Glen McGrath and Shane warne went wicketless
18. Only World cup where all semi finalist belonged to same group
That's some T20 style opening partnership!