Legitimizing the term "cis male/female" I think is a big L in this conversation. I feel it's like saying "four legged dog" when describing canines. 99.9% of people internationally are normal men and women. Why are we changing language to clarify that people aren't the exception?
I've been explaining this Marxist redefining of language to people for years, and how they need to stop legitimizing it, but they just look at me with a blank stare.
I don't accept being called "cis" anything. I am a biological woman and no one else has the right to tell me that I have to accept another term - especially a group that is demanding that they be called by whatever gender they gave chosen to be called today.
Why? Because they are feminists, obviously. Reality in general plays very little role in the lives of women, they rate high in agreeableness and have sky high in-group preference, so they will eagerly go along with utter nonsense spewed other women rather than stand up for the truth.
If you ever saw a kid who was bullied in school become a bully, it makes sense. These can be especially dangerous people because they know how it feels to be bullied, but they still inflict it on others because they enjoy their new position of power.
I know from what I read that hundreds of millions probably billions of women feel inadequate in terms of the beauty in terms of relationships and all kinds of other things And men as success objects, feel inadequate, because they don’t have any success. And all she did was call him fucking pathetic… What a sweet woman And we live in a world where both men and women don’t proactively help the sexes they don’t help each other become successful In fact a strong, independent successful woman that was supposed to be helping from the very beginning, just stood back and watched him or her fail and flail, and despite his successes, she just fucking laughed because she’s not bound to help anyone. That’s the real world that we live in so stick to your heroes journey boys no one not even your own fucking mothers is going to help you.
@Riviwriter There is no meaningful definition of "toxic masculinity." There is only masculinity, which exists naturally and will not be molded into something "better," and there is anti- social, destructive behavior. You will not ever get rid of the latter, unfortunately, and you can only corrupt the former by trying to change it.
I'm very glad for Liz and Zach's pushback because I can't help but feel that this lady just doesn't quite understand what it's like to be a boy/man. I don't blame her because, well, she's not a man. Also I don't like how easily she just called things misogynistic or dismissed Huberman. People don't really refer to those girls on the streets who brag about cheating on their boyfriends as misandrist, but Huberman is a misogynist for dating multiple people simultaneously? Also part of being a guy, which has negatives and positives, is not caring as much about respectability. Not in an essentialist way, but it's enough of a trend that we categorize bravery in the standing alone sense as masculine. And while it's possible that people are treating boys with less emotional care because of conditioning, could it also be that parents are responding to what's in front of them, which in the case of boys is usually a pretty rambunctious kid who can't sit still long enough to talk about his feelings? My mom treated my brother and I differently because at some point she realized it was futile to use the same approach since we were different people. I was always an "old soul" and well liked by my teachers and adults, but my brother was more comfortable with his friends and not usually particularly compliant unless something really had his attention. And then there's the matter of testosterone, which tells us a great deal about how status motivates men. Even if you talk with boys more about their feelings, I still imagine that groups of boys will talk considerably less about their feelings than comparable groups of girls, instead taking solace in simply doing things with their "bros"/"homies." There's a lot more that could be said, but overall I just don't think this lady has a great idea of what it's like to be a man, including the associated motivations and longings that come with the territory.
Agreed. She seems to be part of the group that thinks of boys as if they are "defective girls" and tries to apply what works for girls to boys which won't end up well. Dr Jon Barry from the 'Center for Male Psychology' talks about this. Her attempts to give a second chance to the vile APA also shows how she has no understanding of men. Again, this could be due to the fact that she is a woman and probably won't truly understand men which is absolutely fine! But then why write a book about masculinity by doing such limited research?
I can't help but be pretty skeptical of this woman. For someone who has clearly spent a lot of time researching boyhood, she appears to have a pretty limited understanding of masculinity Edit: I have gone from being skeptical to having conviction she is pretty full of shit - 41:40 - is a pretty remarkable exchange with Liz. Kudos to Liz for always challenging the interview subject
Yeah, I had them both pegged as full of shit by 20:00, so you are VERY generous with your benefit of the doubt! I can't believe this is a "Libertarian" channel, smhd.
I was skeptical from the start where she was talking about left brain vs right brain thinking. Everyone knows that is bullshit. Shame too, I was excited to hear a conversation on modern day masculinity but it's not going to be found in this video. Oh well, at least I can still read the works of Marcus Aurelius.
This lady is ridiculous. She's not citing sources or actual data. She's literally making stuff up. Kids are improving in schools? Is she serious? All they've done is drop standards. The SATs for decades had to be dropped to lower and lower standards. Places in California have dropped algebra from their curriculum!
Reason should keep Liz Wolfe as long as possible. I really enjoy her analysis even when I don’t agree. Her analysis sometimes help me to challenge my own thoughts and that’s exactly what I need from any media platform. Shout out to Liz Wolfe! 🙌🏿. Keep her reasonTV and happy Independence Day to all 🗽🇺🇸 * my comment about Liz isn’t specifically about this video it’s about her analysis over the years on various topics.
Sorry not a good guest. She doesn't seem to have a good understanding of men and what young men are going through. Thread incoming: If you want to have a conversation on masculinity, I would highly recommend Dr. Warren Farrell, (author of The Boy Crisis), Dr. John Barry (from the Center for Male Psychology) or if you can get a bigger guest, Dr. Jordan Peterson. They have a much better idea about what men are going through. The feature that unites these three men is that they don't despise men nor are they condescending to men (unlike the bureaucrats at the APA). I feel Ruth comes of as quite condescending as she doesn't understand men. I also wonder how she would feel if a man gives advice on femininity. Even worse, she tries to make excuses for the terrible APA guidelines. The correct response to the APA declaring traditional masculinity as toxic is to call them out and mock them. They have already proved they don't know what's good for men. They act condescendingly towards men and they expect men to follow their advice? lol! Most of the problems you talked about in the interview have been addressed by Jordan Peterson years ago. But he was considered public enemy #1 by the heinous corporate press. He was even attacked by the press for having a mostly male audience (especially in the Channel 4 interview)! As if there's something wrong with it. Maybe these journalists couldn't get it through their thick heads that he has a mostly male audience because a lot of men find value in his seminars about responsibility? He was attacked by the NYT (Nellie Bowles who apparently regrets doing stuff like that when she was a leftist?) and he didn't even say a smidge of what Andrew Tate says now. JP has pulled a lot of men from suicidal thoughts and has a bunch of examples of men thanking him for helping them mature and take control of their lives. And in return, he was attacked by the media because apparently the media doesn't want men to be better? Ruth also doesn't understand Andrew Tate phenomenon. After JP was attacked a lot by the media taking him out of context, a lot of men wanted to look for someone who would fight back against the media and that's where Tate comes in. A lot of his advice is terrible and he even exploited lonely men years ago through his cam sites. But he still talks about genuine concerns about men to hold a big audience. If the media viciously attacks benign role models like JP, young men would be radicalised against the media and would look for a fighter. On the topic of self help geared towards men, she seems to associate it with misogyny and Andrew Tate? This shows she doesn't understand why men consume a lot of content like that and just rationalizes it by thinking i's a result of men playing video games and pretending to be the main character? What? She says we must value the boring diligent work rather than the bombastic playboy millionaire lifestyle that Tate puts out but that is exactly what Jordan said years ago with his "clean up your room" and "The greatest adventure is assumed by taking responsibility and telling the truth". And in return, he was derided by the mainstream media. JP is also very emotional and he cries in multiple interviews talking about the letters he receives from his followers on how he has helped them. Ironically, the corporate journalists who associate him with "toxic masculinity" made fun of him for openly being emotional. JP probably personifies all the good qualities that Ruth mentions and yet, he was hounded relentlessly by the media I feel if you guys truly want to understand what men are going through, get one of those 3 men on the podcast (Maybe others can chime in with other good examples in the comments). Ruth seems quite condescending as she doesn't understand what men are going through. She did some research and suddenly writes a book about masculinity? The results speak for themselves. Jordan Peterson still fills auditoriums wherever he goes and still has people commenting under his videos on how he has helped them. Someone who tries to make excuses for the APA (maybe because their friends are working there) for what they did probably won't have much to offer men since they don't have enough respect for men and would rather talk down to men.
There's a lot wrong with what this woman said. I think she was wrong as often as she was right. Mostly when she's wrong is when she utilizes the idea that boys are socialized to like certain things. As if very young boys only like superheroes because they've been taught to. No, these things speak to a deeply innate aspect of being male.
Her bullshit is straight of the late 1960s feminism. As when they forced boys to play with dolls and the feminist "researchers" were humiliated when the boys didn't want to play with the dolls like girls do, instead they threw them around and did things like make the dolls fight, etc. Why the hell would any "libertarian" channel ask a frigging Bay Area feminist about raising boys?
I see it as a sign of a very affluent society. During a depression goofy Ideas about # genders such don't take hold, because mosr people have much more things to spend there energy on.
@@alexanders88exactly. A large chunk of the population has it so good they start trying redefine human nature with predictably poor results. Encouraging young people to question whether or not their minds align with their bodies is asking for trouble. Thankfully I had parents that didn't encourage me to question whether or not i actually liked watching the scrambled p1ayboy channel on cable
@Riviwriter A better comparison would be a couple of guys with daughters explaining about how they experience "girlhood" and being a woman/feminine. See the difference?
@@wakkablockablaw6025 because murder is illegal? Abortion is a medical procedure that can be done for a variety of reasons, it’s not the same as killing or murder
As a man, I know that for all questions about masculinity I turn to progressive feminist women from San Francisco who clearly know nothing about being a man and have contempt for normal male behavior. 🤨
There have been a lot of them and the bottom line is that the single greatest predictor for a bad life outcome in a child is growing up without their real dad in the home. shocking! But women ignore that and you find arrogant women like this Liz Wolfe trying to tell young men who they should be listening to instead of Andrew Tate. Because, again, women just do not get it, and never will. She does not even know how dumb she sounds doing that.
It's fine to have a guest who doesn't echo the opinions your listeners expect to hear. Discussion through differences of opinion can be illustrative in many ways, and they are important to engage with instead of dismissing. That said, the guest admits herself having strange feelings such as feeling (at one point) extremely disappointed to find out she was having boys instead of girls, but she never interrogates how utterly strange this is. It is not a natural phenomenon (such as, in the past, worrying a daughter won't be able to be a big an asset to the family given the nature of the world around you). It has been brute-forced into society through ideology. People being male or female is not political. They are the two irreducable categories of human being. They are a fact of nature, created by billions of years of evolution. You can be disappointed that you imagined having a girl and got a boy (or vice versa), but any further negative feeling in the modern age is dysfunctional and strange. That's just the tip of the iceberg with this guest...
There seem to be a lot of negative comments on this podcast. I thought it was quite informing. I like the distinctions Ruth made between traditional views on masculinity and her own. I think that it still seems like men who came back from WWII and chose not to talk about their experiences in the war are idolized, like it's somehow noble rather than unhealthy to suppress negative emotions.
I didn’t know that men That came back from war and didn’t talk about what went on there were idolized..? Emotions should be expressed to the right party. That said, the rising male suicide rate is quite concerning. The rise in depression and anxiety in both sects is as well. We have much better mental health awareness and treatment today yet we seem much more screwed up now.. probably many different factors but something is way off. The rewarding of victimhood amongst younger people can’t be helping
Two things we need to confront if we're to survive this. 1st, To the extent funds obtained from activities other than the free market, that funding is defined as force, it's effect on the market, on people, is force; meaning, such censorship, propaganda, boycotts, advertisers, donors, etc. are forcing their own "will" on others, i.e., criminally taking both free choice & "freewill". 2nd, "Agent of the State", legal term, refers to those supposed private entities who are supported by the govt (force) in carrying out said "State's" agenda ie govt run UA-cam publishers censoring their comment sections. Hear me out! More specifically: Ex 1 We trusted libertarians like Argentine president Milei, to guide the freedom movement, & they advocated peace over justice if not compliance such as in when lp candidate Jorgenson, Kato, & others advocated for the Govt's Covid Agenda against us. More specifically, Milei trumpets anarcho~capitalism yet stakeholder capitalism & public private partnership while seeming fascist from an American view, appears to be good enough for them, for libertarians, ancaps, & objectivists, & that's a real problem. Milei sounds like another pied piper, in other words. Indeed, it is starting to look like Objectivist, Libertarian, & Ancaps have a major blind spot when it comes to fascism as well as when & how individuals, a people, ought to respond to tyrannical governance. Yaron Brook, ARI Dir & most popular Objectivist, doesn't say Americans should fight back, He does say we ought fight for another country though, further empowering our own, fighting for another even more turnkey totalitarian to their own. Tbc, all these ill gotten gains from money printing, from govt, both foreign & domestic, or from other schemes such a ponzi whether fostered by govt or not, is fascistic in its effect on the market, in its effect on individuals, yet Brooks nor other Objectivist channels argue near enough against it. Not by the standards Americans are supposed to, as I reason it. In short, Milei & those of his ilk may be exactly the influence that is debilitating us in the face of this terifying tyranny. Did I mention he, Brooks, tries to insinuate only luddites are concerned... Of course, he can deny & squirm around my condemnation, but it is about fighting time, & he leading the way, has Ayn Rand's people as of yet on the wrong side of history. It's a major disappointment, to say the least. A note about Ancaps: Ancap bitcoiners self censored their comment sections for covid & climate Agendas to keep making money on social media. Simply stated, these false ideas, Objectivism, Libertarianism & Anarchism, do not enough teach people to claim the space/land/terrotory, that it's worth dying better yet killing for, that the space is not under any circumstances for sell nor to be sold or even lost, & that those who betray that, that idea/position, such as Israel, as Yaron Brook representing the Ayn Rand Institute, & Objectivists, Libertarians, & Anarchists more broadly have, ought be held accountable which includes yourself. Simply stated, stop supporting these fascist who are selling out our country & are unwilling to fight for it. ua-cam.com/video/SByjfbOUvWc/v-deo.htmlsi=Qcu-yyYploI16IuE Ex. 2 Here's your Fascist Israel. Here's what Fascist Yaron Brooks, Ayn Rand Inst. Dir., supports in his support of Israel, the enemy of our United States, attacking Thomas Massie, for starters: Indeed, Israel is lobbying against Thomas Massie in Kentucky, the best representative we have. Next, on the issue of ×~Harvard President Gay, Brooks misses the point completely. The supposed expert on fascism attributes her leaving to how bad her plagiarism was, but she wasn't punished for it until she came under fire from Israel. More to it, the Israeli government lobbies or otherwise contributes to it, to these actions against our freedom of speech, even against our citizens, our politicians, & probably against Gay herself. Lobbying is bad enough, but by the government, let alone a foreign one, to designate criticism of Israel, Israelis, Jews or any other form of expression as hatespeech or otherwise illegal is really unacceptable In furtherance, government is force & that goes for all these billionaires made rich by govt or otherwise illegitimate means, these using their funds to take our free expression, even manipulate us at all, gets to eventually be fascist ie criminal force as i reason it. Btw these fascists, the Israeli government, Brooks, & the rest, are dragging us into an unjust & indefensible genocide & war. Finally, who funds that congresswoman that was subverting the meaning of words, who misconstrued Israel & Jews in her questioning of Gay? It's so obvious, I don't have to look. Speaking of being so obvious, it is beyond obvious Brooks, an expert on fascism, already knows all this I'm offering here, but yet he doesn't say as much, choosing to mislead instead. Below is a short Glenn Greenwald clip that cuts to the quick. A note about Ancaps: Ancap bitcoiners self censored their comment sections for covid & climate Agendas to keep making money on social media platforms, so forget those fascist sellouts too. In conclusion, these people aren't willing to fight for a free land, that's un-American, & that's how we lose. ua-cam.com/video/ygnjzh_qTKo/v-deo.htmlsi=oUQXVGLYQoxkunW4 Ex 3 At this point I only want one thing from government agents, officials, servants etc... & that is to see them on trial for the Covid Agenda. For real, I feel like people have forgotten what our government just did & in some cases they're still doing to us: Trump did use public health, like Nazis did, to force medical experiments on us. Governor Abbott locked Texans down for his Covid Agenda & his supporters attack an anti-genocide protester, protesting another Covid Agenda state, Israel. We live in upside down world. In a right side up world, they'd have handled Abbott like that. Really is pathetic The Amer govt forced medical experiments on people, locked down the country, churches closed, families threatened, wealth stolen & the Israeli state doing the same but worse, & now w/ Amer support genociding Palestinians, stripping & carting off the innocent, & our government outlaws speech against this. Nazis were also all about public health & genocide. Make America CHINA w/ Trump Again, on the ISRAEL 1st Ticket. If you support someone who locked down this country, then it's like you locked it down, & I don't like being locked down. Biden is bad but not as bad as ignoring this fascist takeover ie lesser of two evils doesn't matter now. It may eventually work out, but at what cost, & that's just it, the cost is too high as I see it & once the surveilance state is up, it's said to be virtually impossible to bring down. The Govt forced Covid Agenda was so harmful that civil liability couldn't possibly bring justice to victims. Criminal charges, convictions, and punishments are necessary. Perhaps if those w/ means had to suffer during it half as much as the poor, we wouldn't be so passively & patently un-American about such outrages. A big part of the problem is how these fascist Agendas seem to leave police blameless. After all, it was pushed through fear mongering, through censorship, through incentives or deprivation, to name a few, & we don't see police enforcing that. Policemen nor even govt really were seen refusing service to the unvaccinated like hospitals did, didn't guard food from the unmasked, didn't demand no jab-no job. They, police, didn't, but they sure protected the ones that did. In the end, influencers need to influence, resist the pull to become "manufactured consent". It wasn't as necessary that Thomas Paine grabbed a British soldier as it was needed that he justified even promoted it. The rich didn't suffer Trump's covid agenda like the rest of us ie no jab no job, guarding food from the unmasked, denying services including healthcare to the unjabbed, and even going so far as closing public itself. They forced a mask on my loved ones. All this talk about why is annoying. I want one thing for them, justice. Strange more don't say that as well. For instance, if I put a dress on your son or a burka on your woman, you shouldn't be okay with that . More to it, immigrants are better than Trump supporters.They're the ones responsible for the covid agenda; not immigrants. My fellow Americans didn't defend me & mine from fascists denying public & all manner of services, so open the borders & the prisons. I'll take my chances in dangerous freedom. Maybe then I can protect myself from the police you wouldn't protect us from, when they're overran. 17 million they say government & its supporters killed w/ that TrumpJab. Of course, that doesn't include the deaths of despair, impoverishing of a nation, & much more. Rebelling ain't easy!
@Redtecho ty for your time. Could you please articulate my position better & argue against it... Also there's this here to further explain: These "criminal public servants" taking our govt buildings, need to go to prison. Ty for pushing back against public servants making govt "by appt only". They'd like to force everything online, track our phones, & make us carry the "Real" ID w/ our vaccination, social or fiscal credit scores etc. records thus easily electronically accessible. Justice 1st, not gold, not religion, not reform, not even America, but Justice. Justice 1st puts Americans 1st. Working, reasoning, ("works" in other words) to defend the weak puts God 1st. Govt run youtbe censors my American 1st Amm right to speak. Arrest them as criminal "Agents of the State"! Advocating "Civil Disobedience" isn't good enough. Complying is dying as their New Normal where they can demand lockdowns, facemasking, & medical experiments gives away too much. Forcing such on citizens while they travel is outrageous enough, but what of the poor who cannot travel far enough to escape our own locality even for necessities ie aquiring food, healthcare, etc...or even sunlight, public itself being denied. We have had our choice taken, govt fear mongers the citizenry via propaganda & censorship, limits our access by threatening businesses to close & then offers subsidies to make it possible, giving our taxes, our wealth to bailout businesses which did stay open, saving them from the lost revenue following govt dictates causes them, lost via discrimination policies barring those without masks or jabs from entering which includes public buildings/services no less. In short, govt ordering regulating supplementing private & public discrimination, makes them culpable & those entities aiding them otherwise known as Agents of the State in such a capacity, ought be held criminally culpable for the doing, is what needs to be done. To end. simply dragging our feet in compliance isn't good enough as the Covid Agenda presents a bridge too far down the road to tyranny, forcing a mask on your face just to be able to buy something to eat. In accordance, advocate resistance, revolt, protesting w/ pitchforks & torches, arresting both govt agents as well as the Agents of the State crucially helping carry this out in what was the private sector too. This is the pressure which we must bring to bear. A rifle behind every blade of grass. No justice, no peace. Speaking of which, Trump is responsible for this whole fiasco, his own global genocide, mass extinction event & Massie & Rand Paul need to remember that when they offer support to his candidacy, or promote him in that endeavor. I cut them some slack on this because they're politicians but no one else. He's the worst of two evils in other words. More specifically, Trump bribed & bullied states into forcing his Covid Agenda & Red Flag Laws. Wtbs, we should have dissolved our tyranical govt with our 2nd Amm when they forced the covid agenda on & now our children could be drafted to die in the Russian front for the CIA New World Order. Moreover, where did Tom Woods & Michael Malice come from? How is Tom Woods Antiwar, when he supports Trump who with his Covid Agenda, waged war on the Amer people, let alone the world, killing & taking freedom in his actions. How is Woods living up to not "hurting people or taking their stuff, or the Non Agression Principle? Tom won't fight a strongman but he'll support one. Reminds me of Michael Malice promoting Texas Govenor Abbott for supposedly protecting him when under Abbott, for Covid, a tank was sent to shut down a bar. Those two need to remember this is America, where you're cuturally expected to dissolve tyranical governance, what the 2nd Amm is really for. Say that, say, become strong; not support Strongman ie support freedom over security.
This is unserious, why have a woman talk about masculinity? There are plenty of men writing books about this, like Richard Reeves and his book Of Boys and Men. What a credibility hit.
Why do you even have these women on it doesn't seem like they're contributing anything thoughtful... Just demonstrating why we should stay far away from people like this
I made it to 54 mins! If I want to hear about masculinity from a lady, I prefer she has successfully raised a couple men, not one that it is in the middle of the attempt. But then again I have entirely stopped listening to anyone under the age of 40 at this point, with few exceptions so clearly I am not a model to follow. :D
28:16 what are the majority of majors between boys and girls? Difficultly weighting of those majors competed? Who actually pays off student loans. Might be proportional to life satisfaction and lifestyle comparisons? I think a man can live comfortably in a sub $100k lifestyle. Where a woman's basic needs are easily 3x+ needing bigger income.
Would love to see her on with Jordon Peterson. Social studies by nature are extremely unreliable and heavily dictated by the bias of the who is preforming the studies... What we do know is that "some" different behaviors are based on physiological differences between males and females (i.e. hormone differences, bone density and muscle mass differences, etc.). I have also seen studies in which young boys were forced to "talk about or discuss" their social and behavioral issues, and their anxiety levels, as well as poor behavior increased... It has been shown fairly conclusively that even at infancy, boys prefer things, and girls prefer people... The answer seems intuitive to some degree... Let boys and girls, be boys and girls... In general boys need to express themselves in a more physical manner, and girls tend to be more emotionally expressive... Nothing wrong with that.
5:52 I could totally see how brains develop different. Girls have way more parts and metabolism. So, they develop more synaptic connections earlier. I don't want to jump to conclusions but it might be correlated.
Exactly. Even in the mid 90s, when I was in high school, teachers would remind us of how the SATs continually had to lower their standards to maintain the curve. I can't imagine what they're like now. Seeing how politicized education is I don't think most kids today are taught critical thinking skills to any degree. Politics and critical thinking are almost always mutually exclusive. Teaching intelligent design and gender ideology are two glaring examples. Some of it started to creep in during my senior year of high school.
Liz is clueless and can go pound sand, young men have zero interest in Tim Ferris or any other self-help type their smothering mommies think they should be following. She has no clue why Andrew Tate resonates because she is part of the problem.
Go ahead and censor these but you really should repost my well researched and professionally written comment about maternal child abuse. I guess it's OK when mom does it. Or is it that all you want to do is shill somebody's book. Again, cowards censor, real men counter argues.
IKR!? Hearing some brain dead woman tell young men that he is who they SHOULD be following is just another example of the massive hubris of the modern feminist. I don't care if she calls herself a Libertarian, she is a clueless feminist who knows NOTHING about boys, much like the clueless feminist Brit guest.
Yes. It’s so noticeable at this point that my older mother and her sister complain about how “passive and wimpy” young men are these days lol. And they have no idea of the culture war going on
Legitimizing the term "cis male/female" I think is a big L in this conversation. I feel it's like saying "four legged dog" when describing canines. 99.9% of people internationally are normal men and women. Why are we changing language to clarify that people aren't the exception?
I've been explaining this Marxist redefining of language to people for years, and how they need to stop legitimizing it, but they just look at me with a blank stare.
To create division and chaos.
I don't accept being called "cis" anything. I am a biological woman and no one else has the right to tell me that I have to accept another term - especially a group that is demanding that they be called by whatever gender they gave chosen to be called today.
Why? Because they are feminists, obviously. Reality in general plays very little role in the lives of women, they rate high in agreeableness and have sky high in-group preference, so they will eagerly go along with utter nonsense spewed other women rather than stand up for the truth.
If you ever saw a kid who was bullied in school become a bully, it makes sense. These can be especially dangerous people because they know how it feels to be bullied, but they still inflict it on others because they enjoy their new position of power.
"We are a generarion of men raised by women. Im wondering if another woman is the answer we need." - fight club
Yeah, women like these two just do not get it. I pity their sons, I really do, smhd.
I know from what I read that hundreds of millions probably billions of women feel inadequate in terms of the beauty in terms of relationships and all kinds of other things
And men as success objects, feel inadequate, because they don’t have any success. And all she did was call him fucking pathetic… What a sweet woman
And we live in a world where both men and women don’t proactively help the sexes they don’t help each other become successful
In fact a strong, independent successful woman that was supposed to be helping from the very beginning, just stood back and watched him or her fail and flail, and despite his successes, she just fucking laughed because she’s not bound to help anyone.
That’s the real world that we live in so stick to your heroes journey boys no one not even your own fucking mothers is going to help you.
Fight club is a cautionary tale against toxic masculinity. Did you even read the book?
@Riviwriter There is no meaningful definition of "toxic masculinity." There is only masculinity, which exists naturally and will not be molded into something "better," and there is anti- social, destructive behavior. You will not ever get rid of the latter, unfortunately, and you can only corrupt the former by trying to change it.
No women from my mother to teachers or any employee has added anything of value to my life. Only been an absolute drain!
Even at the very start she uses the terms "right wing" and "sexist", and she refers to boys "behaving badly". She really has not given up that stance
This is to bash, men and boys not to talk about their issues in any real way.
We are never told we can't express our emotions; it's just that in experience we learned that no one cares and it can be thrown back as an attack.
It’s time to change that
I'm very glad for Liz and Zach's pushback because I can't help but feel that this lady just doesn't quite understand what it's like to be a boy/man. I don't blame her because, well, she's not a man. Also I don't like how easily she just called things misogynistic or dismissed Huberman. People don't really refer to those girls on the streets who brag about cheating on their boyfriends as misandrist, but Huberman is a misogynist for dating multiple people simultaneously? Also part of being a guy, which has negatives and positives, is not caring as much about respectability. Not in an essentialist way, but it's enough of a trend that we categorize bravery in the standing alone sense as masculine. And while it's possible that people are treating boys with less emotional care because of conditioning, could it also be that parents are responding to what's in front of them, which in the case of boys is usually a pretty rambunctious kid who can't sit still long enough to talk about his feelings? My mom treated my brother and I differently because at some point she realized it was futile to use the same approach since we were different people. I was always an "old soul" and well liked by my teachers and adults, but my brother was more comfortable with his friends and not usually particularly compliant unless something really had his attention. And then there's the matter of testosterone, which tells us a great deal about how status motivates men. Even if you talk with boys more about their feelings, I still imagine that groups of boys will talk considerably less about their feelings than comparable groups of girls, instead taking solace in simply doing things with their "bros"/"homies." There's a lot more that could be said, but overall I just don't think this lady has a great idea of what it's like to be a man, including the associated motivations and longings that come with the territory.
Agreed. She seems to be part of the group that thinks of boys as if they are "defective girls" and tries to apply what works for girls to boys which won't end up well. Dr Jon Barry from the 'Center for Male Psychology' talks about this. Her attempts to give a second chance to the vile APA also shows how she has no understanding of men. Again, this could be due to the fact that she is a woman and probably won't truly understand men which is absolutely fine! But then why write a book about masculinity by doing such limited research?
I can't help but be pretty skeptical of this woman. For someone who has clearly spent a lot of time researching boyhood, she appears to have a pretty limited understanding of masculinity
Edit: I have gone from being skeptical to having conviction she is pretty full of shit - 41:40 - is a pretty remarkable exchange with Liz. Kudos to Liz for always challenging the interview subject
Yeah, I had them both pegged as full of shit by 20:00, so you are VERY generous with your benefit of the doubt! I can't believe this is a "Libertarian" channel, smhd.
I was skeptical from the start where she was talking about left brain vs right brain thinking. Everyone knows that is bullshit.
Shame too, I was excited to hear a conversation on modern day masculinity but it's not going to be found in this video. Oh well, at least I can still read the works of Marcus Aurelius.
This lady is ridiculous. She's not citing sources or actual data. She's literally making stuff up. Kids are improving in schools? Is she serious? All they've done is drop standards. The SATs for decades had to be dropped to lower and lower standards. Places in California have dropped algebra from their curriculum!
Reason should keep Liz Wolfe as long as possible. I really enjoy her analysis even when I don’t agree. Her analysis sometimes help me to challenge my own thoughts and that’s exactly what I need from any media platform. Shout out to Liz Wolfe! 🙌🏿. Keep her reasonTV and happy Independence Day to all 🗽🇺🇸 * my comment about Liz isn’t specifically about this video it’s about her analysis over the years on various topics.
Stop simping, you are making a fool of yourself, simp.
Sorry not a good guest. She doesn't seem to have a good understanding of men and what young men are going through.
Thread incoming:
If you want to have a conversation on masculinity, I would highly recommend Dr. Warren Farrell, (author of The Boy Crisis), Dr. John Barry (from the Center for Male Psychology) or if you can get a bigger guest, Dr. Jordan Peterson. They have a much better idea about what men are going through. The feature that unites these three men is that they don't despise men nor are they condescending to men (unlike the bureaucrats at the APA). I feel Ruth comes of as quite condescending as she doesn't understand men. I also wonder how she would feel if a man gives advice on femininity.
Even worse, she tries to make excuses for the terrible APA guidelines. The correct response to the APA declaring traditional masculinity as toxic is to call them out and mock them. They have already proved they don't know what's good for men. They act condescendingly towards men and they expect men to follow their advice? lol!
Most of the problems you talked about in the interview have been addressed by Jordan Peterson years ago. But he was considered public enemy #1 by the heinous corporate press. He was even attacked by the press for having a mostly male audience (especially in the Channel 4 interview)! As if there's something wrong with it. Maybe these journalists couldn't get it through their thick heads that he has a mostly male audience because a lot of men find value in his seminars about responsibility? He was attacked by the NYT (Nellie Bowles who apparently regrets doing stuff like that when she was a leftist?) and he didn't even say a smidge of what Andrew Tate says now. JP has pulled a lot of men from suicidal thoughts and has a bunch of examples of men thanking him for helping them mature and take control of their lives. And in return, he was attacked by the media because apparently the media doesn't want men to be better?
Ruth also doesn't understand Andrew Tate phenomenon. After JP was attacked a lot by the media taking him out of context, a lot of men wanted to look for someone who would fight back against the media and that's where Tate comes in. A lot of his advice is terrible and he even exploited lonely men years ago through his cam sites. But he still talks about genuine concerns about men to hold a big audience. If the media viciously attacks benign role models like JP, young men would be radicalised against the media and would look for a fighter.
On the topic of self help geared towards men, she seems to associate it with misogyny and Andrew Tate? This shows she doesn't understand why men consume a lot of content like that and just rationalizes it by thinking i's a result of men playing video games and pretending to be the main character? What?
She says we must value the boring diligent work rather than the bombastic playboy millionaire lifestyle that Tate puts out but that is exactly what Jordan said years ago with his "clean up your room" and "The greatest adventure is assumed by taking responsibility and telling the truth". And in return, he was derided by the mainstream media. JP is also very emotional and he cries in multiple interviews talking about the letters he receives from his followers on how he has helped them. Ironically, the corporate journalists who associate him with "toxic masculinity" made fun of him for openly being emotional. JP probably personifies all the good qualities that Ruth mentions and yet, he was hounded relentlessly by the media
I feel if you guys truly want to understand what men are going through, get one of those 3 men on the podcast (Maybe others can chime in with other good examples in the comments). Ruth seems quite condescending as she doesn't understand what men are going through. She did some research and suddenly writes a book about masculinity? The results speak for themselves. Jordan Peterson still fills auditoriums wherever he goes and still has people commenting under his videos on how he has helped them. Someone who tries to make excuses for the APA (maybe because their friends are working there) for what they did probably won't have much to offer men since they don't have enough respect for men and would rather talk down to men.
Well put, kudos! This episode made me lose a TON of respect for Reason. One of the biggest fails I have ever seen on this channel.
Warren Ferrell would have been a great guest for this episode
@@brianmeen2158 True.
Trying to apply feminist frameworks to boys’ issues will do nothing but make things worse
There's a lot wrong with what this woman said. I think she was wrong as often as she was right. Mostly when she's wrong is when she utilizes the idea that boys are socialized to like certain things. As if very young boys only like superheroes because they've been taught to. No, these things speak to a deeply innate aspect of being male.
Her bullshit is straight of the late 1960s feminism. As when they forced boys to play with dolls and the feminist "researchers" were humiliated when the boys didn't want to play with the dolls like girls do, instead they threw them around and did things like make the dolls fight, etc. Why the hell would any "libertarian" channel ask a frigging Bay Area feminist about raising boys?
We are completely screwed as a society.
There are definitely a handful of things in modern culture that really has me shaking my head in disbelief
I see it as a sign of a very affluent society. During a depression goofy Ideas about # genders such don't take hold, because mosr people have much more things to spend there energy on.
@@alexanders88exactly. A large chunk of the population has it so good they start trying redefine human nature with predictably poor results. Encouraging young people to question whether or not their minds align with their bodies is asking for trouble. Thankfully I had parents that didn't encourage me to question whether or not i actually liked watching the scrambled p1ayboy channel on cable
I increasingly believe that.
Got to thank God that I live in the community where none of these things mentioned here are even issues for us...
Based
Don't know where to start with the points these women make are kind of dumb..not really connected to reality...
"Kind of" dumb was quite generous of you!
Great. Another conversation between two women about how men should live.
oh yes because men never make laws about how women can live and what we can do with our bodies or anything like that
@Riviwriter A better comparison would be a couple of guys with daughters explaining about how they experience "girlhood" and being a woman/feminine. See the difference?
@@Riviwriter What's wrong with laws that prevent women from killing their babies?
@@wakkablockablaw6025 because murder is illegal? Abortion is a medical procedure that can be done for a variety of reasons, it’s not the same as killing or murder
@@Riviwriter ...you're literally killing a human fetus? What are you talking about??? Do you not know what an abortion is?
I'm here for Liz's scowl!
I identify as an F150.
Silverado
I'm on the Tundra/Tacoma spectrum
I'm Tundra/Tacoma fluid
As does my son and its been hell getting a parking spot for him in the classroom
@@identifiesas65.wheresmyche95 lolz 😆 🤣 😂 😅
As a man, I know that for all questions about masculinity I turn to progressive feminist women from San Francisco who clearly know nothing about being a man and have contempt for normal male behavior.
🤨
I object to being called a sis male. I'm just a male thanks, I don't need a qualifier
JUST A QUESTION FOR ALL: If you are a parent, how does your relationship differ with each of your children ?
1:08:13 - You should do a study to follow the male sons of single and divorced women.
@@YouilAushana ouch
There have been a lot of them and the bottom line is that the single greatest predictor for a bad life outcome in a child is growing up without their real dad in the home. shocking! But women ignore that and you find arrogant women like this Liz Wolfe trying to tell young men who they should be listening to instead of Andrew Tate. Because, again, women just do not get it, and never will. She does not even know how dumb she sounds doing that.
liz. lol you gotta move that camera back. its way to close for comfort.
It's fine to have a guest who doesn't echo the opinions your listeners expect to hear. Discussion through differences of opinion can be illustrative in many ways, and they are important to engage with instead of dismissing.
That said, the guest admits herself having strange feelings such as feeling (at one point) extremely disappointed to find out she was having boys instead of girls, but she never interrogates how utterly strange this is. It is not a natural phenomenon (such as, in the past, worrying a daughter won't be able to be a big an asset to the family given the nature of the world around you). It has been brute-forced into society through ideology. People being male or female is not political. They are the two irreducable categories of human being. They are a fact of nature, created by billions of years of evolution. You can be disappointed that you imagined having a girl and got a boy (or vice versa), but any further negative feeling in the modern age is dysfunctional and strange.
That's just the tip of the iceberg with this guest...
There seem to be a lot of negative comments on this podcast. I thought it was quite informing. I like the distinctions Ruth made between traditional views on masculinity and her own. I think that it still seems like men who came back from WWII and chose not to talk about their experiences in the war are idolized, like it's somehow noble rather than unhealthy to suppress negative emotions.
I didn’t know that men
That came back from war and didn’t talk about what went on there were idolized..?
Emotions should be expressed to the right party. That said, the rising male suicide rate is quite concerning. The rise in depression and anxiety in both sects is as well. We have much better mental health awareness and treatment today yet we seem much more screwed up now.. probably many different factors but something is way off. The rewarding of victimhood amongst younger people can’t be helping
That's not what stoicism is.
31:48 - maybe just offer stimulation and space to cultivate thoughts.
Two things we need to confront if we're to survive this.
1st, To the extent funds obtained from activities other than the free market, that funding is defined as force, it's effect on the market, on people, is force; meaning, such censorship, propaganda, boycotts, advertisers, donors, etc. are forcing their own "will" on others, i.e., criminally taking both free choice & "freewill".
2nd, "Agent of the State", legal term, refers to those supposed private entities who are supported by the govt (force) in carrying out said "State's" agenda ie govt run UA-cam publishers censoring their comment sections.
Hear me out!
More specifically:
Ex 1
We trusted libertarians like Argentine president Milei, to guide the freedom movement, & they advocated peace over justice if not compliance such as in when lp candidate Jorgenson, Kato, & others advocated for the Govt's Covid Agenda against us.
More specifically, Milei trumpets anarcho~capitalism yet stakeholder capitalism & public private partnership while seeming fascist from an American view, appears to be good enough for them, for libertarians, ancaps, & objectivists, & that's a real problem. Milei sounds like another pied piper, in other words.
Indeed, it is starting to look like Objectivist, Libertarian, & Ancaps have a major blind spot when it comes to fascism as well as when & how individuals, a people, ought to respond to tyrannical governance. Yaron Brook, ARI Dir & most popular Objectivist, doesn't say Americans should fight back, He does say we ought fight for another country though, further empowering our own, fighting for another even more turnkey totalitarian to their own.
Tbc, all these ill gotten gains from money printing, from govt, both foreign & domestic, or from other schemes such a ponzi whether fostered by govt or not, is fascistic in its effect on the market, in its effect on individuals, yet Brooks nor other Objectivist channels argue near enough against it. Not by the standards Americans are supposed to, as I reason it.
In short, Milei & those of his ilk may be exactly the influence that is debilitating us in the face of this terifying tyranny.
Did I mention he, Brooks, tries to insinuate only luddites are concerned... Of course, he can deny & squirm around my condemnation, but it is about fighting time, & he leading the way, has Ayn Rand's people as of yet on the wrong side of history. It's a major disappointment, to say the least.
A note about Ancaps: Ancap bitcoiners self censored their comment sections for covid & climate Agendas to keep making money on social media.
Simply stated, these false ideas, Objectivism, Libertarianism & Anarchism, do not enough teach people to claim the space/land/terrotory, that it's worth dying better yet killing for, that the space is not under any circumstances for sell nor to be sold or even lost, & that those who betray that, that idea/position, such as Israel, as Yaron Brook representing the Ayn Rand Institute, & Objectivists, Libertarians, & Anarchists more broadly have, ought be held accountable which includes yourself. Simply stated, stop supporting these fascist who are selling out our country & are unwilling to fight for it.
ua-cam.com/video/SByjfbOUvWc/v-deo.htmlsi=Qcu-yyYploI16IuE
Ex. 2
Here's your Fascist Israel. Here's what Fascist Yaron Brooks, Ayn Rand Inst. Dir., supports in his support of Israel, the enemy of our United States, attacking Thomas Massie, for starters:
Indeed, Israel is lobbying against Thomas Massie in Kentucky, the best representative we have.
Next, on the issue of ×~Harvard President Gay, Brooks misses the point completely. The supposed expert on fascism attributes her
leaving to how bad her plagiarism was, but she wasn't punished for it until she came under fire from Israel.
More to it, the Israeli government lobbies or otherwise contributes to it, to these actions against our freedom of speech, even against our citizens, our politicians, & probably against Gay herself. Lobbying is bad enough, but by the government, let alone a foreign one, to designate criticism of Israel, Israelis, Jews or any other form of expression as hatespeech or otherwise illegal is really unacceptable
In furtherance, government is force & that goes for all these billionaires made rich by govt or otherwise illegitimate means, these using their funds to take our free expression, even manipulate us at all, gets to eventually be fascist ie criminal force as i reason it.
Btw these fascists, the Israeli government, Brooks, & the rest, are dragging us into an unjust & indefensible genocide & war.
Finally, who funds that congresswoman that was subverting the meaning of words, who misconstrued Israel & Jews in her questioning of Gay? It's so obvious, I don't have to look.
Speaking of being so obvious, it is beyond obvious Brooks, an expert on fascism, already knows all this I'm offering here, but yet he doesn't say as much, choosing to mislead instead.
Below is a short Glenn Greenwald clip that cuts to the quick.
A note about Ancaps: Ancap bitcoiners self censored their comment sections for covid & climate Agendas to keep making money on social media platforms, so forget those fascist sellouts too.
In conclusion, these people aren't willing to fight for a free land, that's un-American, & that's how we lose.
ua-cam.com/video/ygnjzh_qTKo/v-deo.htmlsi=oUQXVGLYQoxkunW4
Ex 3
At this point I only want one thing from government agents, officials, servants etc... & that is to see them on trial for the Covid Agenda. For real, I feel like people have forgotten what our government just did & in some cases they're still doing to us: Trump did use public health, like Nazis did, to force medical experiments on us.
Governor Abbott locked Texans down for his Covid Agenda & his supporters attack an anti-genocide protester, protesting another Covid Agenda state, Israel. We live in upside down world. In a right side up world, they'd have handled Abbott like that. Really is pathetic
The Amer govt forced medical experiments on people, locked down the country, churches closed, families threatened, wealth stolen & the Israeli state doing the same but worse, & now w/ Amer support genociding Palestinians, stripping & carting off the innocent, & our government outlaws speech against this. Nazis were also all about public health & genocide.
Make America CHINA w/ Trump Again, on the ISRAEL 1st Ticket. If you support someone who locked down this country, then it's like you locked it down, & I don't like being locked down.
Biden is bad but not as bad as ignoring this fascist takeover ie lesser of two evils doesn't matter now. It may eventually work out, but at what cost, & that's just it, the cost is too high as I see it & once the surveilance state is up, it's said to be virtually impossible to bring down.
The Govt forced Covid Agenda was so harmful that civil liability couldn't possibly bring justice to victims. Criminal charges, convictions, and punishments are necessary. Perhaps if those w/ means had to suffer during it half as much as the poor, we wouldn't be so passively & patently un-American about such outrages.
A big part of the problem is how these fascist Agendas seem to leave police blameless. After all, it was pushed through fear mongering, through censorship, through incentives or deprivation, to name a few, & we don't see police enforcing that. Policemen nor even govt really were seen refusing service to the unvaccinated like hospitals did, didn't guard food from the unmasked, didn't demand no jab-no job. They, police, didn't, but they sure protected the ones that did.
In the end, influencers need to influence, resist the pull to become "manufactured consent". It wasn't as necessary that Thomas Paine grabbed a British soldier as it was needed that he justified even promoted it.
The rich didn't suffer Trump's covid agenda like the rest of us ie no jab no job, guarding food from the unmasked, denying services including healthcare to the unjabbed, and even going so far as closing public itself.
They forced a mask on my loved ones. All this talk about why is annoying. I want one thing for them, justice. Strange more don't say that as well. For instance, if I put a dress on your son or a burka on your woman, you shouldn't be okay with that .
More to it, immigrants are better than Trump supporters.They're the ones responsible for the covid agenda; not immigrants. My fellow Americans didn't defend me & mine from fascists denying public & all manner of services, so open the borders & the prisons. I'll take my chances in dangerous freedom. Maybe then I can protect myself from the police you wouldn't protect us from, when they're overran.
17 million they say government & its supporters killed w/ that TrumpJab. Of course, that doesn't include the deaths of despair, impoverishing of a nation, & much more.
Rebelling ain't easy!
The fuck you smoking fam?
TLDR
Do you expect anybody to read all of this?
@@firstandforemost87 the point is I'm calling attention to something, hoping someone can take it, say it better, & pass it on.
@Redtecho ty for your time. Could you please articulate my position better & argue against it...
Also there's this here to further explain:
These "criminal public servants" taking our govt buildings, need to go to prison.
Ty for pushing back against public servants making govt "by appt only". They'd like to force everything online, track our phones, & make us carry the "Real" ID w/ our vaccination, social or fiscal credit scores etc. records thus easily electronically accessible.
Justice 1st, not gold, not religion, not reform, not even America, but Justice. Justice 1st puts Americans 1st. Working, reasoning, ("works" in other words) to defend the weak puts God 1st.
Govt run youtbe censors my American 1st Amm right to speak. Arrest them as criminal "Agents of the State"!
Advocating "Civil Disobedience" isn't good enough. Complying is dying as their New Normal where they can demand lockdowns, facemasking, & medical experiments gives away too much. Forcing such on citizens while they travel is outrageous enough, but what of the poor who cannot travel far enough to escape our own locality even for necessities ie aquiring food, healthcare, etc...or even sunlight, public itself being denied.
We have had our choice taken, govt fear mongers the citizenry via propaganda & censorship, limits our access by threatening businesses to close & then offers subsidies to make it possible, giving our taxes, our wealth to bailout businesses which did stay open, saving them from the lost revenue following govt dictates causes them, lost via discrimination policies barring those without masks or jabs from entering which includes public buildings/services no less.
In short, govt ordering regulating supplementing private & public discrimination, makes them culpable & those entities aiding them otherwise known as Agents of the State in such a capacity, ought be held criminally culpable for the doing, is what needs to be done.
To end. simply dragging our feet in compliance isn't good enough as the Covid Agenda presents a bridge too far down the road to tyranny, forcing a mask on your face just to be able to buy something to eat. In accordance, advocate resistance, revolt, protesting w/ pitchforks & torches, arresting both govt agents as well as the Agents of the State crucially helping carry this out in what was the private sector too.
This is the pressure which we must bring to bear. A rifle behind every blade of grass. No justice, no peace.
Speaking of which, Trump is responsible for this whole fiasco, his own global genocide, mass extinction event & Massie & Rand Paul need to remember that when they offer support to his candidacy, or promote him in that endeavor. I cut them some slack on this because they're politicians but no one else. He's the worst of two evils in other words.
More specifically, Trump bribed & bullied states into forcing his Covid Agenda & Red Flag Laws.
Wtbs, we should have dissolved our tyranical govt with our 2nd Amm when they forced the covid agenda on & now our children could be drafted to die in the Russian front for the CIA New World Order.
Moreover, where did Tom Woods & Michael Malice come from? How is Tom Woods Antiwar, when he supports Trump who with his Covid Agenda, waged war on the Amer people, let alone the world, killing & taking freedom in his actions. How is Woods living up to not "hurting people or taking their stuff, or the Non Agression Principle?
Tom won't fight a strongman but he'll support one. Reminds me of Michael Malice promoting Texas Govenor Abbott for supposedly protecting him when under Abbott, for Covid, a tank was sent to shut down a bar.
Those two need to remember this is America, where you're cuturally expected to dissolve tyranical governance, what the 2nd Amm is really for.
Say that, say, become strong; not support Strongman ie support freedom over security.
This is unserious, why have a woman talk about masculinity? There are plenty of men writing books about this, like Richard Reeves and his book Of Boys and Men. What a credibility hit.
Why do you even have these women on it doesn't seem like they're contributing anything thoughtful... Just demonstrating why we should stay far away from people like this
I found myself asking that same question. Could a channel be less in touch with its audience?
I made it to 54 mins! If I want to hear about masculinity from a lady, I prefer she has successfully raised a couple men, not one that it is in the middle of the attempt. But then again I have entirely stopped listening to anyone under the age of 40 at this point, with few exceptions so clearly I am not a model to follow. :D
54:16 and we got the Kardashians with plastic surgery of the week
28:16 what are the majority of majors between boys and girls? Difficultly weighting of those majors competed? Who actually pays off student loans. Might be proportional to life satisfaction and lifestyle comparisons?
I think a man can live comfortably in a sub $100k lifestyle. Where a woman's basic needs are easily 3x+ needing bigger income.
1:04:39 - see! Just let these weirdos talk themselves into a circle.
Would love to see her on with Jordon Peterson. Social studies by nature are extremely unreliable and heavily dictated by the bias of the who is preforming the studies... What we do know is that "some" different behaviors are based on physiological differences between males and females (i.e. hormone differences, bone density and muscle mass differences, etc.). I have also seen studies in which young boys were forced to "talk about or discuss" their social and behavioral issues, and their anxiety levels, as well as poor behavior increased... It has been shown fairly conclusively that even at infancy, boys prefer things, and girls prefer people... The answer seems intuitive to some degree... Let boys and girls, be boys and girls... In general boys need to express themselves in a more physical manner, and girls tend to be more emotionally expressive... Nothing wrong with that.
She lost me when she denied that women have innate value and men don't. Andrew Tate is spot on with that comment.
37:47 WRONG - is like a version of "finding yourself".
5:52 I could totally see how brains develop different. Girls have way more parts and metabolism. So, they develop more synaptic connections earlier. I don't want to jump to conclusions but it might be correlated.
Maybe the problem is trying to erase the problems 😞 just accept them and that it is never going to change
stop using ai for sound processing it sucks, just get rid of the noise during recording
If incels in fact ARE masculine enough, then women should be seeking them out.
56:07 Andrew tate is the bad boy you love to hate.
Almost no discussion of real-life male role models and how boys can differentiate a difference between media packaged 'products' and real people .....
33:06 - yes, boys respond well to structure, respect and appreciation.
Academic achievement has been deteriorating worldwide, since the end of WWII, although it is much more widely disseminated.
Exactly. Even in the mid 90s, when I was in high school, teachers would remind us of how the SATs continually had to lower their standards to maintain the curve. I can't imagine what they're like now. Seeing how politicized education is I don't think most kids today are taught critical thinking skills to any degree. Politics and critical thinking are almost always mutually exclusive. Teaching intelligent design and gender ideology are two glaring examples. Some of it started to creep in during my senior year of high school.
1:08:53 Tim Ferris whom I believe lives in SF!
Liz is clueless and can go pound sand, young men have zero interest in Tim Ferris or any other self-help type their smothering mommies think they should be following. She has no clue why Andrew Tate resonates because she is part of the problem.
This woman is not impressive.
Been there done that lol
Just how she speaks and behaves comes off demeaning.
Maybe it's just the british accent?
Welcome to the bay area
Go ahead and censor these but you really should repost my well researched and professionally written comment about maternal child abuse. I guess it's OK when mom does it. Or is it that all you want to do is shill somebody's book. Again, cowards censor, real men counter argues.
1:09:25 Tim weirdo Ferris is not my representative
IKR!? Hearing some brain dead woman tell young men that he is who they SHOULD be following is just another example of the massive hubris of the modern feminist. I don't care if she calls herself a Libertarian, she is a clueless feminist who knows NOTHING about boys, much like the clueless feminist Brit guest.
It’s disappearing not changing…
Yes. It’s so noticeable at this point that my older mother and her sister complain about how “passive and wimpy” young men are these days lol. And they have no idea of the culture war going on
I don't identify as a "dude." I think terms like dude and chick are objectifying.
One sided sorry