Concord Wide Margin vs Brevier Clarendon Wide Margin

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 вер 2024
  • A look at how the Cambridge Concord Wide Margin and the Brevier Clarendon Wide Margin compare.
    Concord Wide Margin at Amazon (affiliate) amzn.to/2BKjPF6
    Concord Wide Margin at Evangelical Bible evangelicalbib...
    Brevier Clarendon Wide Margin at Bibles-Direct www.bibles-dir...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 32

  • @rjo8500
    @rjo8500 3 роки тому +4

    Your reviews are by far the best.

  • @Pastor-Brettbyfaith
    @Pastor-Brettbyfaith 5 років тому +6

    Greetings my brother. Thanks again for another professional Bible review. I have had both Cambridge and Allan. I have kept the Allan because of the yap. More protection from water damage or coffee spills. I don't worry too much about the gilding, but I am somewhat meticulous with my Bibles. I do not keep them in boxes, but I use them. Wide margins are especially designed for writing in them.
    When we get out of this financial hole that we are in, I am going to start sending out many of these Bibles. We need help, but I ask for your prayers. Thanks again for your excellent reviews.

  • @jlopez47
    @jlopez47 Рік тому +3

    One advantage of the Brevier Clarendon over the Concord (if you will write in the Bible you pick) is that it contains less words per page than the Concord. They roughly have the same margin space available, but with less words per page (i.e. less verses per page) the Allan allows you to take more notes per verse on average.

  • @EzraCansler
    @EzraCansler 2 місяці тому +1

    Always awesome reviews from Randy!

  • @john3_14-17
    @john3_14-17 5 років тому +5

    Great comparison! You should compare the Canterbury Wide Margin with these two when that comes out.

  • @stpierreforjesusthesavior984
    @stpierreforjesusthesavior984 2 роки тому +1

    Your comparison videos are very useful for deciding between one or the other. Thank you.

  • @markrobinson5774
    @markrobinson5774 5 років тому +3

    Cambridge looks bigger than a Allen the font. Love you Cambridge Dictionary beautiful in the RED letter ferocious very well done

  • @pleasevans6394
    @pleasevans6394 3 роки тому +3

    While I would like the heavier paper in the newer edition and as far as viewing on my phone goes the print looks more bold on the Allan, I will most likely be going with the Cambridge because I already have a regular sized Concord.

  • @tyronrossouw44
    @tyronrossouw44 9 днів тому

    Thank you for the review.
    Does this Allan include the translators notes? My Cameo has the translators alternate renderings in the margins which I find insightful. Does this Allan follow the Longprimer 52, by putting the RSV renderings and "the best manuscript" comments in the margin? I really dislike that about the Longprimer 52.

  • @stpierreforjesusthesavior984
    @stpierreforjesusthesavior984 2 роки тому +1

    The Concord - NOT the personal size - says 8/9 typeset, in other words 8 point type, not 9. The leading is 9, but the type is 8 pt, but bc of the spacing, can read as a 9. Am I interpreting "typeset 8/9" correctly???

  • @bls6666661
    @bls6666661 3 роки тому +2

    Hi Randy, great Review, love it...which one is easier to read? Cause my eyes are starting to strain when i read 8 point fonts, thanks

    • @BibleBuyingGuide
      @BibleBuyingGuide  3 роки тому +1

      Thanks Jesus! I find the Concord easier to read because it doesn't have cross-reference and footnote keys in the text. However, both are small and I don't think either of them would be ideal for eyes that strain to read small print.
      The Canterbury would be a better choice because of the larger print.
      Another good option would be the Hendrickson Large Print Wide Margin. It has amazing paper, but the cover is low quality (imitation or hardcover). You can get it for around $15.

    • @bls6666661
      @bls6666661 3 роки тому +1

      Being somewhat of a bible geek I'll get the Cambridge first, then save up again for the Allan cause i already have the Schuyler wide margin ':) ... But for best reading i never thought of the Hendrickson for less than 10% of the price of the Cambridge!!! That's why your the best Randy :)

    • @BibleBuyingGuide
      @BibleBuyingGuide  3 роки тому

      @@bls6666661 thank you!!

  • @paulklenknyc
    @paulklenknyc Рік тому +3

    45gsm, actually.

  • @fishersofmen4727
    @fishersofmen4727 Рік тому +1

    If you had to pick one of these for reading what would you choose?

    • @BibleBuyingGuide
      @BibleBuyingGuide  Рік тому +1

      I prefer the Concord. It has a cleaner text since it doesn't include callers to the references and footnotes. It also has more space within the text.

  • @isactoriguevara6030
    @isactoriguevara6030 10 місяців тому

    There both beautiful Bibles!

  • @gleasonparker1684
    @gleasonparker1684 2 роки тому +2

    I HAVE the CONCORD wide margin in calfsplit. It is nice. I would never buy an Allan.

  • @ReadTheBibleDaily
    @ReadTheBibleDaily 8 місяців тому

    got the RL allan recently.. excellent quality, but words are too small for my eyes. I'm sure the concord will be the same.

    • @BibleBuyingGuide
      @BibleBuyingGuide  8 місяців тому +1

      Yes, the Concord and Brevier Clarendon wide margin text is the same size.

  • @samvogel2368
    @samvogel2368 4 роки тому +1

    What type of paper are the maps? Card stock style or is it the same paper as the rest of the Bible?

  • @gleasonparker1684
    @gleasonparker1684 2 роки тому +2

    I bot the CONCORD wide margin BECAUSE it was available in calf split. I would NOT have bot it in Goatskin
    Too floppy for this size of bible.