Try to listen Grigory Sokolov, especially Golberg Variations, that Glen Gould was famous for. The precision of the play and control of sound make him the best Bach players these days. Gould was very impressed!
The courante (and others) is always interesting on piano to see what performers do dynamically. This interpretation is quite animated and tells a complex story.
me too. she was the first recording i heard of book II and i was immediately and forever mesmerized by her. that was 20 years ago, and no one has replaced her.
Yes you are probably right. This is especially true of music of the complexity of Bach's. For instance in the WTC, there are several versions which I find outstanding: Richter, Hewitt and Gulda, but I would find it hard to chose the best. Each sheds a different light on the work.
Metà dei commenti parla di quale sia l'interpretazione migliore di tutte. Che stupidaggine, ci sono ottime interpretazioni e lo scopo non è quello di trovare quella migliore
There is much in common between of playing by Glenn Gould and Tatiana Nikolaeva. But there is also a significant difference: 1) Gould first recorded Bach's Partitas in the middle of the fifties while Nikolaeva made her records in 1980, so she had already heard Glenn Gould's interpretation; 2) Nikolaeva sends to us very much open feeling and expression while Gould keeps mostly his own emotions inside. Nikolaeva stands on the Earth, Gould lives on the Heaven. I prefer Glenn.
Tatiana trabaja desde el legato , Gould desde el portato-stacatto son dos conceptos muy diferentes , Gould es más rítmico y Tatiana más lírica. No se pueden comparar las dos interpretaciones son las mejores de la historia de la música.
I don't have a copy of the CD. I heard it on YT, but it was later removed due to copyright issues. There's another outstanding version of the partitas I heard recently by Angela Hewitt (on a CD I borrowed).
I don't think it's possible, at this level of playing, to say that something is 'better.' Maybe you prefer another version for some reason; it's subjective. I love Perahia's Bach, perhaps more than Nikolayeva's, but I wouldn't call it better.
Gould was an amateur and a freak, and Tureck was just a joke. Schiff is not in the same league as Richter and Nikolayeva. No one is except Sokolov, perhaps.
Interesting so much staccato, well before Gould made it fairly commonplace. A nice way to set off the voices, but to do it in the allemande and courante? And after the sarabande, back to it in the trio and for much of the gigue. A different touch would be called for, I would think.
very good! Landowska is too much better, but not human. Nobody in the history of world has like Landowska. Nicolayeva is superb, but human, like us. believe in me.
you dont get pianists like this today... because the human sensibility has been abused by an evolutionary deformation caused by a rash of holocausts and world wars in the last twenty seconds of the earth's life...most musicians are not artists, nor are those calling themselves poets, occasionally there is an exception such as Glenn Gould or Nick Drake...in the same way you cannot have a painter like memling or van eyck anymore but you can have damien hirst.all the best for the future!
Absolutely stunning! Her Bach is beyond belief. Simply astonishingly beautiful ❤❤❤❤
She always takes me to the deeper parts of music, especially in Bach...
1-Praeludium, 00:00 2- Allemande, 01:55 3- Corrente, 04:32 4- Sarabande, 07:49 5- Menuet I, 14:12 6- Menuet II, 15:46 7- Gigue 17:23
A stunning performance. Full of emotion. Clean. Beautiful.
Why don't we get pianists like her these days! Really wonderful Bach, articulated, insightful playing.
Try to listen Grigory Sokolov, especially Golberg Variations, that Glen Gould was famous for. The precision of the play and control of sound make him the best Bach players these days. Gould was very impressed!
@@stonefireice6058 Yes love Grigory and Glen Gould. Also Piotr Anderszewski and Yuan Sheng.
@@stonefireice6058generally I quite dislike Sokolov in Baroque repertoire, but oddly I haven't heard much of his Bach
Nikolayeva and Tureck are my favorites on piano. Desert Island stuff.
Nikolayeva is like the finest caviar. Tureck is like canned tuna from a discount store.
Def one of the most underrated and under-appreciated pianists of the 20th century. Outside of Russia, that is, of course.
I heard everything and it's soooooo much bach and soooooo Tatiana. I love the mix, it's great !!! toda !!!
Thank you ! I could not purchase this excellent album.
I believe Tatiana really enjoys playing BACH.
How much I love this Bach!! and what a wonderful interpretation
Very cheerful performance..really wonderful.Unique touch, very interesting interpretation..Thanks for uploading..
The courante (and others) is always interesting on piano to see what performers do dynamically. This interpretation is quite animated and tells a complex story.
I own Tatianna Nikolayeva WTC I & II CDs set for 12 years. She has been my Bach (virtual) teacher and (real) inspiration from the beginning.
me too. she was the first recording i heard of book II and i was immediately and forever mesmerized by her. that was 20 years ago, and no one has replaced her.
I completely agree with you, enormous number of experts and common people.who share this opinion.
Je découvre cette pianiste . Très belle interprétation.
очень гармонично и глубоко. могу бесконечно слушать...
Yo pienso lo mismo. Es muy bello. Yo no conocía a esta concertista. Es exquisita.
Quelle musique! Quel grand art!
Yes you are probably right. This is especially true of music of the complexity of Bach's. For instance in the WTC, there are several versions which I find outstanding: Richter, Hewitt and Gulda, but I would find it hard to chose the best. Each sheds a different light on the work.
Metà dei commenti parla di quale sia l'interpretazione migliore di tutte. Che stupidaggine, ci sono ottime interpretazioni e lo scopo non è quello di trovare quella migliore
Sublime.
Это лучшее исполнение Баха❤
Духозахватывающе
Lucid and pure Bach.
Excelente!!!!
There is much in common between of playing by Glenn Gould and Tatiana Nikolaeva. But there is also a significant difference: 1) Gould first recorded Bach's Partitas in the middle of the fifties while Nikolaeva made her records in 1980, so she had already heard Glenn Gould's interpretation; 2) Nikolaeva sends to us very much open feeling and expression while Gould keeps mostly his own emotions inside. Nikolaeva stands on the Earth, Gould lives on the Heaven. I prefer Glenn.
Tatiana trabaja desde el legato , Gould desde el portato-stacatto son dos conceptos muy diferentes , Gould es más rítmico y Tatiana más lírica. No se pueden comparar las dos interpretaciones son las mejores de la historia de la música.
Sublime 🙏
I don't have a copy of the CD. I heard it on YT, but it was later removed due to copyright issues. There's another outstanding version of the partitas I heard recently by Angela Hewitt (on a CD I borrowed).
Thanks a million!
I don't agree, but I appreciate your opinion.
素晴らしい音楽ありがとうございます
I don't think it's possible, at this level of playing, to say that something is 'better.' Maybe you prefer another version for some reason; it's subjective. I love Perahia's Bach, perhaps more than Nikolayeva's, but I wouldn't call it better.
Superb!
Thank You!....
Maravilhoso
My favorite Bach pianists: Gould, Richter, Tureck, Schiff, Nikolayeva.
Gould was an amateur and a freak, and Tureck was just a joke. Schiff is not in the same league as Richter and Nikolayeva. No one is except Sokolov, perhaps.
du grand art
Long time ago she proved she's a right person to play JSB.
Have worked on this partita for many years. It is so difficult.
Very interesting performance.
your cat is very cute.
me too!!
I presume this is the 1980 performance issued in the UK on CD by OLYMPIA?
Sadly, only the first three Partitas were issued in the UK.
🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Interesting so much staccato, well before Gould made it fairly commonplace. A nice way to set off the voices, but to do it in the allemande and courante? And after the sarabande, back to it in the trio and for much of the gigue. A different touch would be called for, I would think.
Is this on any album? Is it available to purchase?
well, why not post it, MarcusHK1, I would sure love to hear it. :)
Great, but please look at the Rosita Renard version. in my opinion the best of all...
I have that performance on CD. I agree that it is a great performance.
Interesting performance. Anyway the allemande is somewhat too fast in my opinion.
very good! Landowska is too much better, but not human. Nobody in the history of world has like Landowska.
Nicolayeva is superb, but human, like us.
believe in me.
Then you have not heard Tatianna play the WTC. It's like a visit to heaven without using the one way only pass that we all have.
She is even better then Gould
It's very good, but I think Ramin Bahrami's version is better.
Moriarty brought me here. :)
The end of the prelude is pathetic. The allemande too fast: it is an elegant dance, not a rush to catch your train.
you dont get pianists like this today... because the human sensibility has been abused by an evolutionary deformation caused by a rash of holocausts and world wars in the last twenty seconds of the earth's life...most musicians are not artists, nor are those calling themselves poets, occasionally there is an exception such as Glenn Gould or Nick Drake...in the same way you cannot have a painter like memling or van eyck anymore but you can have damien hirst.all the best for the future!
Keep taking the tablets
@@cstoreyqc lmfaoooooo ikrrr hehehehehheh
The allemande is taken much too quickly. It’s a stately, processional dance, it should flow.